JTK wrote:
Finally. Now if we could just understand why you are still in the newsgroups
despite having given up on Mozilla, we'll all be happy.
No, I suspect you won't.
Try us. Tell us why, despite your obvious hatred for Mozilla, you're admitted
opinion that it's horrid and forever doomed,
Boris Zbarsky wrote:
img width=768 onload=javascript:launch_diapo() ; height=512
src=url_image.jpg
Try taking out the javascript: part from the onload attribute value,
leaving:
onload=launch_diapo();
I'm surprised the code ever worked in Mozilla as written and that it
works in IE
Christian Biesinger wrote:
Vincent wrote:
I works well with 0.9.5 and all IE version. But since 0.9.6 the onLoad
does not work:
img width=768 onload=javascript:launch_diapo() ; height=512
src=url_image.jpg
Hm... it could be http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62288
Could
Vincent wrote:
So, I am not wrong: Mozilla should call the function launch_diapo()
after loading image ?
It's a Mozilla bug...or not ?
Yes. It's a Mozilla bug.
--
Greetings to Echelon and the NSA:
president usa attack world trade center afghanistan terrorist terrorism
bioterrorism anthrax
Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
I want to browse a machine on my LAN whose web server runs off port 79.
I can do so with the lynx, konqueror and opera browsers, as I expect.
But both Mozilla (0.9.4) and Galeon (0.12.1) browsers instantly bring
up a dialog that says:
Access to the port number
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
The Type/Creator code system is not such a bad idea. remember you have 4
places in creator code and Type code. You can concevieably use any of
the 26 letters in the alphabet in each
DeMoN LaG wrote:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 26 Dec 2001:
My great-grandchildren will be driving to work in nuclear-powered
hovercraft and eating their meals in pill form by then.
And I bet their hovercraft and the machine that
DeMoN LaG wrote:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 27 Dec 2001:
Finally. Now if we could just understand
why you are still in the newsgroups despite having given up on
Mozilla, we'll all be happy.
No, I suspect you won't.
Now not only
Christian Biesinger wrote:
Vincent wrote:
So, I am not wrong: Mozilla should call the function launch_diapo()
after loading image ?
It's a Mozilla bug...or not ?
Yes. It's a Mozilla bug.
Enjoy the Laetitia Casta backdoor for helping me - french girl power - :
Cat wrote:
Right, it is quite a bit better than Netscape 6.1. IE 3.0 was quite a
bit better than Netscape 6.1, years ago. Communicator 4.7x is better
than both of them, especially in the mail/news department.
Browser-wise, IE6 beats the bejesus out of all of those combined.
1.Can you stop
JTK wrote:
Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
Access to the port number given has been disabled for security reasons
The problem is that a malicious, invalid URL can be given to Mozilla,
and Mozilla will pass it *unchecked* to lower levels.
Huh?
The problem are not invalid URLs, they are _valid_
The HTML Form Protocol Attack, discussed heavily on Bugtraq
(http://www.securityfocus.com/cgi-bin/archive.pl?id=1start=2001-10-17end=2001-10-23threads=0[EMAIL PROTECTED])
with details here -- http://www.remote.org/jochen/sec/hfpa/index.html
is a dangerous attack, and there is no easy way for
Christian Biesinger wrote:
JTK wrote:
Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
Access to the port number given has been disabled for security reasons
The problem is that a malicious, invalid URL can be given to Mozilla,
and Mozilla will pass it *unchecked* to lower levels.
Huh?
The problem are
Gregory Spath wrote:
No nightly has fixed this one yet.
Basically, if I wipe my profile, the first run is fine. Anything after,
however, and I lose all of the text in the UI (buttons, etc), right
clicks on objects (ie, bookmarks) in the ui instead of giving a menu
give a little blank
IE has this feature that automatically follows all links on a web page
and stores them in a cache for off-line reading. Does Netscape have
such feature?
I'm running NS4.78 on Windows2000 and Mozilla and Netscape 6.2 on Linux.
Greetings - hopefully this is an appropriate place for this question.
I've just installed Netscape 6.2.1 as I was starting to have problems
with 4.73 (I may post details of the problem if anyone's interested as
it was a strange one - to do with the prog taking _ages_ to process a
downloaded
Sorry if this is a bit simple, but I can't find anywhere to turn on
display of full email headers in Netscape 6.2.1 (View|Headers|All
doesn't appear to make a difference. POP3 mail accounts).
TIA
Chris
--
---
Techno stuff
JTK wrote:
Christian Biesinger wrote:
Greetings to Echelon and the NSA:
president usa attack world trade center afghanistan terrorist terrorism
bioterrorism anthrax white house pentagon car bomb
Please stop this sub-juvenile BS. The remains of four thousand-some
murdered civilians is
DrF wrote:
where is ver 6.2.1 mail newsgroup profile info stored so I can ensure
I am backing them up?
This depends on your windows version.
It's either in c:\documents and settings\username\application
data\mozilla\profilename\random_number.slt\Mail
or at c:\windows\application
David W. Fenton wrote:
I used tabs all the time, and have found the close X to be
unreliable. that is, I have some difficulty clicking on it and
having the active tab actually close. I fail about 1/3 of the time,
Why dont you use the middle mouse button for closing tabs? IMHO it is
much
Helge Hielscher wrote:
Why dont you use the middle mouse button for closing tabs? IMHO it is
much more convinient.
I can't do that... because if I do, mozilla opens whatever I had
selected the last time as an URL...(X mouse)
--
Morten Nilsen, aka Dr. P
4th Age webmaster designer -
Am 27.12.2001 14:53 schrieb TGOS:
Windows Me/XP:
C:\windir\Application Data\Mozilla\Profiles\profile-name\
In XP, it's in \documents and settings\...
Holger
--
No matter how fast light travels it finds the darkness has always
got there first, and is waiting for it. (Terry Pratchett, Reaper
Am 27.12.2001 14:14 schrieb DrF:
Sorry if this is a bit simple, but I can't find anywhere to turn on
display of full email headers in Netscape 6.2.1 (View|Headers|All
doesn't appear to make a difference. POP3 mail accounts).
This feature is broken in Netscape 6.2.1.
BTW, the Netscape 6
Am 27.12.2001 14:08 schrieb DrF:
where is ver 6.2.1 mail newsgroup profile info stored so I can ensure
I am backing them up?
In Windows 98, it's in \Windows\Application
Data\Mozilla\Profiles\YourProfile\.slt\Mail...
Holger
--
No matter how fast light travels it finds the darkness has
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
Well I can vouch there is at least one end user testing Mozilla. grin (myself)
*waves hand* You can add me to that list, too. Although most my
friends are geeks and computer professionals of some sort, I'm just a
general happy Linux user. I've enjoyed
JTK wrote:
Please stop this sub-juvenile BS.
[...] you're sadly mistaken if you think you're doing
anything other than making an abhorrent ass of yourself.
I could repeat that right back at you and I think most of the readers
here would agree with me. But that's contrary to the
DeMoN LaG wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 26 Dec 2001:
Unless things have changed since DOS/W3.11.W 95 days when you
double click on an application you have to browse to the
application you desire open said
Christian Biesinger wrote:
This post makes me consider trying to implement news killfiles...
Oh, please, please think seriously about it. So many of us will be so
glad to add use this feature and get free forever of some posters that
only make us lose time...
JTK wrote:
-snip-
I thought Netscape was AOL. They've never helped end users with
anything other than teach them the hard way how much of the internet
they were missing.
Actually Netscape is owned by a Partnership (equally) of SUN and AOL
AOL is interested in the
Travis Crump wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
The Type/Creator code system is not such a bad idea. remember you have 4
places in creator code and Type code. You can concevieably use any of
the 26 letters in the alphabet in each place. I hope my math is right
but the are 26 to the
Sören Kuklau wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
The Type/Creator code system is not such a bad idea. remember you have 4
places in creator code and Type code. You can concevieably use any of
the 26
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
You do have to remember though that the 26^4 possibility is just for the
Type Code or the Creator code by itself. If you consider both together
that means that there are 26^4
Morten Nilsen wrote:
Helge Hielscher wrote:
Why dont you use the middle mouse button for closing tabs? IMHO it is
much more convinient.
I can't do that... because if I do, mozilla opens whatever I had
selected the last time as an URL...(X mouse)
This is a known bug. The workaround
Hi
Since www.themes.org is now load of utter crap (which used to be good for
mozilla themes), where can you now find mozzila themes?
thanks.
Am 27.12.2001 17:35 schrieb DrF:
Thanks for all the pointers. Now, a related question.is there
anything I should beware of if I should ever have to restore my profile
data from a backup? Ie so I lose my profile info an my HD, can I just
replace the profile directories with an archived
Am 27.12.2001 16:58 schrieb TGOS:
Oh...
Then the information on this page is wrong:
http://home.netscape.com/eng/mozilla/ns62/CCKDocs/profile_appx_cck.htm
I don't know how the profile path looks like when you _upgrade_ fom
WinME to XP. It could be that certain locations from the old ME are
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 27 Dec 2001:
what do PC users do in the case of a file with a .doc extension.
when they have both Word, WordPerfect, and AmiPro?
Either drag and drop it onto the .exe or a shortcut to the .exe,
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 27 Dec 2001:
You do have to remember though that the 26^4 possibility is just
for the Type Code or the Creator code by itself. If you consider
both together that means that there are 26^4
Stewart hector wrote:
Hi
Since www.themes.org is now load of utter crap (which used to be good for
mozilla themes), where can you now find mozzila themes?
thanks.
There are a few at:
http://www.geocities.com/alfredkayser/mozilla/themes.htm
I suspect there aren't many people making
Lucas MacBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Stewart hector wrote:
Hi
Since www.themes.org is now load of utter crap (which used to be good
for
mozilla themes), where can you now find mozzila themes?
thanks.
There are a few
Am 27.12.2001 18:53 schrieb Travis Crump:
I have never used either, but XP Home and XP Professional might be
different. I must say I was mightily surprised when I looked at the
trusty chart in the stores and saw that getting XP Home would actually
be a downgrade from my current Windows
On Thursday 27 December 2001 04:19 am, Christian Biesinger wrote:
Huh?
The problem are not invalid URLs, they are valid URLs; for example, in
POST Data. This could, would Mozilla not block these ports, for
example be used to send email from the user's IP by posting form data
to a SMTP
On Wednesday 26 December 2001 10:48 pm, Kryptolus wrote:
Quoting http://www.geocities.com/pratiksolanki:
// For security reasons, Mozilla does not allow connections to
// certain ports. To override this on a per-port basis, add a
comma-separated
// list of ports to default/all.js (in your
Hello Eddy,
not exactly. But Mozilla 0.9.7 now saves a page with all additonal
information like pictures and style sheets.
More info here:
http://www.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla0.9.7/#new
Best Regards,
Ansgar
Eddy Cruiser wrote:
IE has this feature that automatically follows all links
On Wednesday 26 December 2001 10:31 pm, Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
I want to browse a machine on my LAN whose web server runs off port
79. I can do so with the lynx, konqueror and opera browsers, as I
expect.
But both Mozilla (0.9.4) and Galeon (0.12.1) browsers instantly bring
up a dialog
Christian Biesinger wrote:
JTK wrote:
Christian Biesinger wrote:
Greetings to Echelon and the NSA:
president usa attack world trade center afghanistan terrorist terrorism
bioterrorism anthrax white house pentagon car bomb
Please stop this sub-juvenile BS. The remains of four
So if mozilla differentiated between a URL with 'post data' and one
without we could type in a url with any port number no problem and if a
post asked for one of the forbidden ports we would have to open it up in
preffs.
Christian Biesinger wrote:
JTK wrote:
Chuck Esterbrook wrote:
On Thursday 27 December 2001 04:36 am, JTK wrote:
Huh?
The problem are not invalid URLs, they are valid URLs;
Nonono, they're invalid - they contain linefeeds etc which are
specifically forbidden by whatever the official URL spec is. This was
all gone over in excruciating detail and I'm sure
JTK wrote:
On Thursday 27 December 2001 04:36 am, JTK wrote:
Huh?
The problem are not invalid URLs, they are valid URLs;
Nonono, they're invalid - they contain linefeeds etc which are
specifically forbidden by whatever the official URL spec is. This was
all gone over in excruciating
It is a general statement against surveillance, because I fear that
Orwell's 1984 will become real.
There is nothing general about it. And wake up sunshine, Orwell's
1984 has been real for decades now, and your outrageous mockery of
murder victims does nothing to undo that situation.
Hi All,
I am running Netscape 6.2.1 on both XP Professional and
NT 4.0, sp6a on the same (multiboot) machine. In XP, when I move
the mouse to the browser address line (http://blah blah blah),
the mouse disappears. In NT, I get the straight up and down
line that shows me where I am editing.
Myke wrote:
This is rather humourous in any case... he doesn't want 1984 to become
real, but by doing this he's really just admitting that most of it has
been done...
Yeah, sadly you're right.
and really, do you think your insignificant number of these
key words is going to cause a
I just installed a Dec 20 AIM beta which works fine. But, it would
have been nice if it had inserted a menu item in Moz -- Win Me (til end
next week I'm gonna stick with milestone 0.9.7). I think I saw that
option in Netscape 6.2.1 (which I uninstalled because I thought Moz and
NS got
Christian Biesinger wrote:
[snip]
Not really. To be honest, I'm not sure anymore why I created that
signature when I did. Given that this might also offend some people, I
decided to remove it.
Thank you.
David W. Fenton wrote:
OK, I've looked on Google and Bugzilla for this one, too, and
didn't find anything. I'm using 0.9.6 on Win95 OSR2.
When I open the History window (having it take over part of the
browser window is an IE-copycat abomination, of course), and change
the view (I hate the
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Lucas MacBride
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Gregory Spath wrote:
No nightly has fixed this one yet.
Basically, if I wipe my profile, the first run is fine. Anything after,
however, and I lose all of the text in the UI (buttons, etc), right
clicks on objects (ie,
Myke wrote:
It is a general statement against surveillance, because I fear that
Orwell's 1984 will become real.
There is nothing general about it. And wake up sunshine, Orwell's
1984 has been real for decades now, and your outrageous mockery of
murder victims does nothing to undo
Nigel L wrote:
I just installed a Dec 20 AIM beta which works fine. But, it would
have been nice if it had inserted a menu item in Moz -- Win Me (til end
next week I'm gonna stick with milestone 0.9.7). I think I saw that
option in Netscape 6.2.1 (which I uninstalled because I
Clinton understood that I had just been through hell in Lampe,
and took it all in stride as he focused on his speech. He not only was
well aware of the mind-control tortures and criminal covert activities
proliferating in Arkansas and the neighboring state of Missouri, but
he condoned
DeMoN LaG wrote:
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 27 Dec 2001:
what do PC users do in the case of a file with a .doc extension.
when they have both Word, WordPerfect, and AmiPro?
Either drag and drop it onto the .exe
JTK wrote:
That is, if you're to believe Mozilla's cache, which is showing me CNN
as of Dec. 20th. No Proxomitron.
I've been following this anomaly since your first post. Cannot reproduce
it ...
However, have you tried deleting the cookie(s) relevant to CNN ?? There
may be some cookie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Morten Nilsen) wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Gunnar S wrote:
David W. Fenton wrote:
Me too ;-) Yep, the clickable area should be bigger, and the
close button could be nicer. I also like this feature pretty
much.
Actually, the X is raised now...
Don't remember if this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Helge Hielscher) wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
David W. Fenton wrote:
I used tabs all the time, and have found the close X to be
unreliable. that is, I have some difficulty clicking on it and
having the active tab actually close. I fail about 1/3 of the
time,
Why dont
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (jdavis) wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I totally agree, the history function has been totally ignored. I
agree with everything you've said. I would be happy if once I got
the history window in the ungrouped view and I sort it in the
order of last visited, I could come back
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 27 Dec 2001:
I am not trying to say one method is better or worse. Just rying to
explain the differences.
The difference, as I see it, is Netscape 6 is a replacement to Netscape
4. On
Jay Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 27 Dec 2001:
JTK wrote:
That is, if you're to believe Mozilla's cache, which is showing me
CNN as of Dec. 20th. No Proxomitron.
I've been following this anomaly since your first post. Cannot
66 matches
Mail list logo
