tj gilcarvr wrote:
Christopher Rued wrote:
Lucas MacBride wrote:
Andrea Monni wrote:
Chris Hoess wrote:
Huh? But I thought the plan was to back out XBL completely! That's
what bug 50349 is all about, and I thought it was going to happen
soon, since the bug is assigned to...
oh.
Hi,
I've installed Mozilla 0.9.6 and Galeon 1.0.1 on my Slackware 8.0 by
downloading the .tgz packages from www.linuxmafia.org. These versions
don't seem to like my plugger 3.3 plugin (and 3.2 too), which was working
fine with my older Mozilla 0.9.3 and Galeon 0.1something, and which is
still
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 22:27:08 -0600,
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Ian Hickson wrote:
: JTK wrote:
: Lynx doesn't have commie graphics slathered about trying to make
: some sort of sophomoric statement.
: Lynx is a text mode browser; it doesn't have _any_ graphics.
:No commie ASCII art
Title: FIND A REAL WOMAN AT FLIRTING.BIZ
NOTE: This is not SPAM! This email was sent to you because your email was entered on a website requesting to be a registered subscriber. If you did not request this email, click here
Could someone please point me in the direction of some documentation on
creating themes. I'll like to dump Modern or Classic out to a folder and
then mod the contents of the folder to try and get the exact theme I want. I
remember this being possible when the releases where still prefixed
lol...good one
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi My Name is Jeff, I thought it might be amusing to give a few people on one of the
newsgroups some grief, however looks like I messed with the wrong person becuase they
seem to have posted my email addy on 250,000 newsgroups.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Simpson wrote:
[snip]
A bug, whose number escapes me right now. Fixed in the recent
nightlies, and the fix should be in 0.9.8.
Fixed meaning it now remembers where you put stuff last time. Some
people have different definitions of fixed, which may or may not get
implemented in the
God the Olympics site blows. You think that for as much money as they
probably spent and are spending on developing the site, that they could
have hired a decent web firm. They broke so many useability guidlines I
cant count them all.
I don't have anything against the Javascript requirement
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to read mail as text and not HTML?
I just had three letters that were redirects to web pages. Is there a
way to force text view of mail?
redirects should be disabled. make sure to disable Javascript in
Mailnews as well.
Otherwise, see bug 30888.
JS wrote:
Has development been suspended with Beonex/Win? Could someone more
versed enlighten me here?
Pretty much, yes. I repeatedly tried to bring versions out, but after a
month of work, the code started to age and still didn't have the quality
I wanted to achieve. Much of it was the
In Internet Explorer, you can type a word into the address bar, hit
ctrl-enter, and the http://www.com is automatically filled in.
Is there an equivalent in Netscape 6.2 or the Windows/linux builds
of Mozilla?
Thanks
Daniel Veditz wrote:
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
Whats bugscape.mcom.com then?
It's the bugzilla instance used to track Netscape-specific issues, the inner
circle of hell to which not a Mozilla bug items are banished when marked
INVALID.
Or when The Conspiracy doesn't want Us to see what They are
Trevor Smithson wrote:
In Internet Explorer, you can type a word into the address bar, hit
ctrl-enter, and the http://www.com is automatically filled in.
Is there an equivalent in Netscape 6.2 or the Windows/linux builds
of Mozilla?
Yes, Mozilla (and I guess NS6.x) is even easier,
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], jon wrote:
I don't have anything against the Javascript requirement though (Sorry
Lynx users, this isn't the 80s anymore).
I have to dissent here. Remember that:
1) Running JS is the cause of basically every browser security hole I've
seen. While I don't do
On 1/19/2002 5:59 PM Trevor Smithson spoke thusly:
In Internet Explorer, you can type a word into the address bar, hit
ctrl-enter, and the http://www.com is automatically filled in.
Is there an equivalent in Netscape 6.2 or the Windows/linux builds
of Mozilla?
I typed in a name, cnn,
David Hyatt wrote:
Actually Gecko supports many IE proprietary extensions, among them
offsetWidth and offsetHeight, innerHTML, and the contextmenu event.
Interestingly, you are responsible for the misguided contextmenu event,
too. (I know nothing about the other cases.)
Auto-fetching
Martin Brown wrote:
[RH7.2 (updated), sawfish/gnome]
I'm seeing something I haven't seen for quite sometime (used to be a
common Netscape problem, years ago), Mozilla (0.9.7) frequently waits
for the mouse to move before responding to a clicked link.
I believe I'm seeing 2 different
Thanks. I could use 4.79, but my intent was to download my AOL mail
into Netscape and then sync my PalmPilot with my AOL mail, but it
doesn't appear you can download AOL mail into 4.79 (not compatible with
IMAP?). Hear of any workarounds for this or a way to directly sync a
Palm with AOL
David Hyatt wrote:
If you don't like the feature, you can turn it off from the Appearance
panel in prefs. As room clears up in the Navigator prefs panel, the
pref will probably migrate to that panel instead.
OK, I'm a webmaster. I don't like this feature. I don't want any more
requests
Ben Bucksch wrote:
David Hyatt wrote:
If you don't like the feature, you can turn it off from the Appearance
panel in prefs. As room clears up in the Navigator prefs panel, the
pref will probably migrate to that panel instead.
OK, I'm a webmaster. I don't like this feature. I don't
On 2002.01.19 12:58 Daniel R. Tobias wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to read mail as text and not HTML?
I don't think there's a way to do that in Mozilla,
Which brings up the question: Why not?
Many people prefer not to have to look at HTMLized e-mail.
--
Chris
Sören Kuklau wrote:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Ben Bucksch wrote:
OK, I'm a webmaster. I don't like this feature. I don't want any more
requests to /favicon.ico onmy server.
How exactly do I reach that Appearance panel
Christopher Rued wrote:
On 2002.01.19 12:58 Daniel R. Tobias wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to read mail as text and not HTML?
I don't think there's a way to do that in Mozilla,
Which brings up the question: Why not?
Many people prefer not to have to look at HTMLized
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hmmm Well, I suppose you could always do what a few misguided
souls did back in the earlier days of IE - sniff for the browser and
just not serve up pages to it (Sorry, get a 'real' browser like
For all interested parties, the fetching of /favicon.ico has been
disabled. Neither 0.9.8 nor nightly builds will automatically fetch that
file.
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120949
--
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither
WDA wrote:
Well, I don't happen to be one of them. Frankly, 100% of all my
colleagues prefer html as opposed to plain text mail.
Why is that? My observation is that about 99.9% of the HTML email I
receive gains absolutely nothing from this other than to waste
bandwidth and disk space.
WDA wrote:
Christopher Rued wrote:
On 2002.01.19 12:58 Daniel R. Tobias wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to read mail as text and not HTML?
I don't think there's a way to do that in Mozilla,
Which brings up the question: Why not?
Many people prefer not to
Yep. Since I doubt I'll have time to focus on the remaining bugs in the
implementation before Mozilla 1.0, it has been disabled in Mozilla and
will remain disabled for 1.0 (unless interested parties other than
myself are willing to tackle and fix the remaining issues).
Dave
([EMAIL
I just tried to install Protozilla http://protozilla.mozdev.org/ ,
which is an addon to Mozilla to allow user-definable protocol schemes
to be defined, letting support for various other URI/URL/URN/etc.
types be added to Mozilla.
Unfortunately, it didn't work for me. In fact, it totally
David Hyatt wrote:
Yep. Since I doubt I'll have time to focus on the remaining bugs in the
implementation before Mozilla 1.0, it has been disabled in Mozilla and
will remain disabled for 1.0 (unless interested parties other than
myself are willing to tackle and fix the remaining issues).
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. said:
I'm another that prefers the html(ized) email. I find it easier to
follow there is something about using monospaced fonts (courier, Geneva
and so on), line breaks, and so on that puts me to sleep and make it
difficult for the old brain to follow. I find I can
Daniel R. Tobias said:
David Hyatt wrote:
Yep. Since I doubt I'll have time to focus on the remaining bugs in the
implementation before Mozilla 1.0, it has been disabled in Mozilla and
will remain disabled for 1.0 (unless interested parties other than
myself are willing to tackle and fix
Does anyone know how to get one's Bugzilla e-mail address changed? I've
poked around in my Bugzilla account, but can't find a way to do it.
Thanks,
--
Tim
Thanks for your hints!
Well, using 'mn ' instead is a nice workaround for the case you don't
want to change neither keyword nor location bar entry.
Anyways, neither Clear Location Bar nor editing localstore.rdf did
work. The solution was to remove the annoying URL from the history!
So what
Sören Kuklau said:
Jonas Jørgensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
pref(browser.chrome.site_icons, true);
pref(browser.chrome.favicons, true);
...has been changed to:
pref(browser.chrome.site_icons, true);
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
Robert Clarkson wrote:
For whatever reason, F11 was toggling into but not out of Full Screen
mode. I rebooted, and suddenely F11 is working properly. Go figure.
Thanks for the advice!
rebooted still not toggling out
Close Mozilla and delete the file
What is the corresponding bug #, if I may ask?
yatsu [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:a22291$106b$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=65067
!!
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
It looks like it:
pref(browser.chrome.site_icons, true);
pref(browser.chrome.favicons, true);
...has been changed to:
pref(browser.chrome.site_icons, true);
pref(browser.chrome.favicons, false);
Dave, you rock! :-D
I'm happy to see this.
I am behind a firewall, but should this really matter?! I'm using the
built-in client to access my netscape.net email and I can't access the
account, nor can I send mail etc using this client. It works fine via the
browser though.
PLEASE EMAIL IF YOU CAN HELP ME WITH THIS IN PRIVATE
why exactly can't you just do 'cp /dev/null webroot/favicon.ico', and
forget about it?
Ben Bucksch wrote:
David Hyatt wrote:
If you don't like the feature, you can turn it off from the Appearance
panel in prefs. As room clears up in the Navigator prefs panel, the
pref will probably
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Hyatt wrote:
Yep. Since I doubt I'll have time to focus on the remaining bugs in the
implementation before Mozilla 1.0, it has been disabled in Mozilla and
will remain disabled for 1.0 (unless interested parties other than
myself are willing to tackle
after a quick query...
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49543#c77
In article a2d080$[EMAIL PROTECTED], Sören Kuklau wrote:
What is the corresponding bug #, if I may ask?
yatsu [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:a22291$106b$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
In Netscape 4.7, when I replied to a message, the spell checker would just
check the stuff I wrote. Now, in 6.2, it checks the entire message. So if
the email thread is real long, it tries to spell check the entire thread!
Is there something I can configure to fix this?
TIA.
Has anybody else noticed an annoying trait of the Mozilla / Apache
combination when they are on the same computer? When you're browsing
your own Web site and you click on a link, rather than piping the file
directly to its helper application, it first downloads it to the
cache and then pipes THAT
Matthew Thomas wrote:
That's not wrong. Computer programs are supposed to do what people want
and expect. That's what they're *for*. If they don't do what a majority
of their users want and expect, they're wrong.
Arg! This is getting circular. Yes, that was the point you made it a
while
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002 19:48:51 -0500,
Travis Crump [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:why exactly can't you just do 'cp /dev/null webroot/favicon.ico', and
:forget about it?
ln -s /dev/zero webroot/favicon.ico
;-)
--
http://thingy.apana.org.au/~fun/ http://www.rocknerd.org/
A
On 19 Jan 2002 17:04:37 GMT,
Chris Hoess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:1) Running JS is the cause of basically every browser security hole I've
:seen. While I don't do it all the time, I often surf with JS turned off.
:(I understand there's a UI bug floating around out there to have a toggle
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002 14:22:47 -0800,
David Hyatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Christian Biesinger wrote:
: For all interested parties, the fetching of /favicon.ico has been
: disabled. Neither 0.9.8 nor nightly builds will automatically fetch that
: file.
:
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 07:48:51PM -0500, Travis Crump wrote:
why exactly can't you just do 'cp /dev/null webroot/favicon.ico', and
forget about it?
Why should I have to? Why do people think it's ok to make a browser that
assumes I have an icon file? What's next? favsound.wav? favflash.swf?
Huh, what do you know: bitching works.
Christian Biesinger wrote:
For all interested parties, the fetching of /favicon.ico has been
disabled. Neither 0.9.8 nor nightly builds will automatically fetch that
file.
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120949
--
They that can give
David Gerard wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002 14:22:47 -0800,
David Hyatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Christian Biesinger wrote:
: For all interested parties, the fetching of /favicon.ico has been
: disabled. Neither 0.9.8 nor nightly builds will automatically fetch that
: file.
:
CaT wrote:
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 07:48:51PM -0500, Travis Crump wrote:
why exactly can't you just do 'cp /dev/null webroot/favicon.ico', and
forget about it?
Why should I have to? Why do people think it's ok to make a browser that
assumes I have an icon file? What's next?
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 11:13:26PM +0100, Christian Biesinger wrote:
For all interested parties, the fetching of /favicon.ico has been
disabled. Neither 0.9.8 nor nightly builds will automatically fetch that
file.
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120949
Kickarse! :)
I have it
Alex ... I agree this is annoying ... and double clicking in on the
preferred spelling in the suggestion box does not function as it did in
netscape 4.7x. Now one has to select the desired word and then click
change. This is much more work. I suspect these will get fixed in the
future so I
CaT wrote:
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 07:48:51PM -0500, Travis Crump wrote:
why exactly can't you just do 'cp /dev/null webroot/favicon.ico', and
forget about it?
Why should I have to? Why do people think it's ok to make a browser that
assumes I have an icon file? What's next? favsound.wav?
Is this a bug with Mozilla not recognizing that the file being
downloaded is local? Is it a bug with Apache? Is it a combination of
the two? I'm just wondering if a) there are any settings I can change
in Mozilla (or Apache) to modify this behaviour should I be looking at
my local
On 2002.01.19 16:29 WDA wrote:
Christopher Rued wrote:
On 2002.01.19 12:58 Daniel R. Tobias wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to read mail as text and not HTML?
I don't think there's a way to do that in Mozilla,
Which brings up the question: Why not?
Many people
On 2002.01.20 01:10 Christopher Rued wrote:
Is this a bug with Mozilla not recognizing that the file being
downloaded is local? Is it a bug with Apache? Is it a combination
of
the two? I'm just wondering if a) there are any settings I can change
in Mozilla (or Apache) to modify this
58 matches
Mail list logo
