Corey --
...and then Corey G. said...
% I have many email files with over 100,000 messages and counting.
Wow!
% However, I cannot get Mutt to indicate over 99,999 messages. It simply
Hmmm...
% chops off the last number making it appear that I have much less. Is
% there a way to expand
Suresh Ramasubramanian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I rather suspect that the path to vim is wrong in his .muttrc
: Especially if he had an rpm install which would dump vim in /bin or /usr/bin -
: and then compiled a new vim from a tarball, that'd put it into /usr/local/bin
:
: Use `which vim`
Marc van Dongen proclaimed on mutt-users that:
That's not the problem. Mutt doesn't seem to let me edit
at all. With this setting, I can postpone a message for
later, then recall it and use `e` to edit but mutt won't
let me
Then check if your tmpdir directory is set properly, or is
Marc --
...and then Marc van Dongen said...
% David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
%
% : % Aborted unmodified message.
% : %
% : % Any suggestions how to overcome this problem?
% :
% : You might start by checking your $editor setting in your muttrc and your
%
% My editor setting points to
David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[snip]
: % : If you can't figure out what's up, try setting mutt's $editor to a
: % : quickie script which calls vim and then waits for a keypress before
: % : exiting so that you can see any error messages that go by.
: %
: % I changed the editor setting
Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 27 Sep 2000:
Well... Thanks for this quick answer, but what choice do I have ?
Making my machine to resolve in the outside world, or have mails
bounce, or having this authentication warning ?
What a choice !
Take it, or leave it ;)
Marc --
...and then Marc van Dongen said...
% David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
%
% [snip]
%
% : % : quickie script which calls vim and then waits for a keypress before
% : %
% : % I changed the editor setting to a script that prints something,
% : % reads a line and then starts to edit.
Marc van Dongen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 27 Sep 2000:
I changed the editor setting to a script that prints something,
reads a line and then starts to edit. It doesn't seem to be
called when I press `e.' I still get the `unmodified' message.
What doesn't get called when you press e, the
Mikko Hänninen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Marc van Dongen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 27 Sep 2000:
: I changed the editor setting to a script that prints something,
: reads a line and then starts to edit. It doesn't seem to be
: called when I press `e.' I still get the `unmodified'
Marc van Dongen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 27 Sep 2000:
: !/path/to/your/editor/here
Good one. I hadn't thought of trying that. It fails
Other shell commands fail as well
Well, that's the "reason" then why your editor isn't getting called.
I have no idea why you couldn't run
Mikko Hänninen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[snip]
: Good one. I hadn't thought of trying that. It fails
: Other shell commands fail as well
[snip]
: I have no idea why you couldn't run any commands from within Mutt
: though, I've never heard of this kind of problem. Can you even
:
No, it's currently not possible, unfortunately.
Too bad.
Wouldn't a variable like "disposition-default" be a good idea?
Are any developers listening here? :-)
Or maybe an extension to mailcap like copiousoutput, or like netscape is
doing it with the "x-mozilla-flags"?
Andy.
--
E-Mail:
Marc van Dongen proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Maybe this is an operating system related problem. I am using
the CDE desktop at the moment but the problem also manifests
itself if I use the openwindows desktop.
Get out of both desktops into the sun shell... try mutt there.
--
Suresh
Emmanuel Anne [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
I am just starting to use mutt, and noticed something :
it is quite hard to configure when you have an email adress
different from your unix account. Generally, you end up using
the sendmail "-f" switch, but in a case like this you get
an
Suresh Ramasubramanian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Get out of both desktops into the sun shell... try mutt there.
No success either:-(
Regards,
Marc van Dongen
On 2000.09.27, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Byrial Jensen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 09:08:23 -0500, David Champion wrote:
Me, too. I take a different approach: I have a short wrapper script
that I use for invoking mutt. It sets LANG, then returns LC_COLLATE to
C
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 27 Sep 2000:
Well... Thanks for this quick answer, but what choice do I have ?
Making my machine to resolve in the outside world, or have mails
bounce, or having this authentication
--
Jeremy Blosser | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://jblosser.firinn.org/
-+-+--
the crises posed a question / just beneath the skin
the virtue in my veins replied / that quitters never win
Hi
I have the folowing options
When I write a mail with a Bcc: header, this header does not get saved to
the Fcc-file. Is there a way to tell mutt to do that?
Thanks,
Andy.
--
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://andy.spiegl.de
PGP/GPG: see headers
o _ _ _
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 05:40:06PM +0200, Andy Spiegl wrote:
When I write a mail with a Bcc: header, this header does not get
saved to the Fcc-file. Is there a way to tell mutt to do that?
:set write_bcc
43rd Law of Computing:
Anything that can go wr
fortune: Segmentation
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 04:09:04PM +0100, Marc van Dongen wrote:
Suresh Ramasubramanian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Get out of both desktops into the sun shell... try mutt there.
No success either:-(
And what does :set ?shell return?
--
- Bruce
Bruce DeVisser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: And what does :set ?shell return?
shell="/usr/bin/bash"
which is correct.
Regards,
Marc van Dongen
How to sort index ( where I see my mailboxes by alpha ) ? I'd like to
keep other folder sorting methods( some folder by date some by thread ).
Thanks
Attila
--
--
- Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Debian 2.2 Linux / 2.2.13 /
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 10:17:17AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Emmanuel Anne proclaimed on mutt-users that:
it is quite hard to configure when you have an email adress
different from your unix account. Generally, you end up using
the sendmail "-f" switch, but in a case like
How to sort index ( where I see my mailboxes by alpha ) ? I'd like to
keep other folder sorting methods( some folder by date some by thread ).
while looking at your folder's message headers: o. (Reverse order: O.)
I discovered this (and many other things I wondered about) by pressing ? for
In my .muttrc, "my_hdr From:" seems to override my set reverse_name heading,
but I want it to be the other way around. I only want the "my_hdr From:"
return address used for new mail and the reverse_name one used for replies.
Any suggestions? (Warning: I haven't used Mutt macros yet--is there a
:set write_bcc
Wow, you are right, it works!
I had found this switch in the manual, but it says:
Controls whether mutt writes out the Bcc header when preparing
messages to be sent. Exim users may wish to use this.
So I thought this is talking about the menu you get to see before you send
OK. I think I've managed to fix this problem by re-compiling 1.2.5
with slang (v1.3.7) instead of ncurses. And BOY, does it have a
different idea about colors! I couldn't believe some of the wacky
things I had in my .muttrc that I guess just weren't being recognized
before (I suppose). I had to
I know know PGP stuff is supposed to be specified via MIME headers. I'm
just not sure which technique is best. Mutt is attaching a Content-Type
header like this:
Content-Type: multipart/encrypted; protocol="application/pgp-encrypted";
boundary="FoLtEtfbNGMjfgrs"
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi,
I think somebody asked about this earlier but the problem apparently
persists: mutt does not decode attachment names. Example:
[-- Attachment #2: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?mar=BBa=2Ejpg?= --]
[-- Type: image/jpeg, Encoding: base64, Size: 33K --]
Obviously, when trying to save this, mutt offers the
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Jeff Howie wrote:
OK. I think I've managed to fix this problem by re-compiling 1.2.5
with slang (v1.3.7) instead of ncurses. And BOY, does it have a
different idea about colors! I couldn't believe some of the wacky
that's mostly in the mutt code (the differences in
On 27, Sep, 2000 at 01:36:46PM +0100, Marc van Dongen wrote:
David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[snip]
: % : If you can't figure out what's up, try setting mutt's $editor to a
: % : quickie script which calls vim and then waits for a keypress before
: % : exiting so that you can see
Is there a way to tag messages before they're saved in the "mbox" or which ever mail
box? There have been a few instances where I did/don't have enough time to reply to
the message but would like to write myself a note as to what the reply should contain.
Another application would be if the
In:
The Mutt E-Mail Client
by Michael Elkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
version 1.2.5
In:
Section 4.3
It is stated that "control-T" is used for tag-pattern. It seems
wrong---on my system "T" is used for tag-pattern and "control-t" for
untagging.
I'm using mutt 1.0.1.
BTW.: I'm not on the
* Emmanuel Anne ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [27 Sep 2000 12:15]:
Maybe I shoud have sent this to mutt-users...
I am just starting to use mutt, and noticed something : it is quite
hard to configure when you have an email adress different from your
unix account. Generally, you end up using the
This happened when opening a mailbox, on a RedHat 6.2 system:
This GDB was configured as "i386-redhat-linux"...
Core was generated by `/usr/local/bin/mutt'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libncurses.so.4...done.
Reading symbols from
Marc --
...and then Marc van Dongen said...
% Bruce DeVisser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
%
% : And what does :set ?shell return?
%
% shell="/usr/bin/bash"
%
% which is correct.
It may be correct, but it isn't stock :-) Try settin $shell to /sbin/sh,
which is guaranteed to be completely
On 2000-09-27 13:29:35 -0500, Petr Hlustik wrote:
I think somebody asked about this earlier but the problem apparently
persists: mutt does not decode attachment names. Example:
[-- Attachment #2: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?mar=BBa=2Ejpg?= --]
[-- Type: image/jpeg, Encoding: base64, Size: 33K --]
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 08:13:56PM -0500, Tim Whitehead wrote:
Is there a way to tag messages before they're saved in the "mbox" or
which ever mail box? There have been a few instances where I
did/don't have enough time to reply to the message but would like to
write myself a note as to what
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 10:40:41PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
BTW, I wonder if $write_bcc affects both the Fcc copy of the email
as well as the message that gets piped to the MTA? Although
well-behaved MTAs of course remove the Bcc header.
Apparently not (experimentally derived answer). My
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 09:47:26PM +0400, Vitaly A. Repin wrote:
When I write the subject of my letter in russian (koi8-r encoding),
the following transformation occurs with letters of the "Subject" field:
Subject: =?koi8-r?B?9MXT1CDS1dPTy8/HzyDawcfPzM/Xy8E=?=
What's the problem? And how
Morten Liebach ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[snip]
: This _is_ a long shot, but: what happens when you try to invoke vim from
: your shell?
It works great!
[snip]
Regards,
Marc van Dongen
Petr Hlustik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 27 Sep 2000:
I think somebody asked about this earlier but the problem apparently
persists: mutt does not decode attachment names.
Assuming the name encoding was done correctly by the sender's mailer,
can this be fixed or worked around in mutt?
Andy Spiegl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 27 Sep 2000:
I had found this switch in the manual, but it says:
Controls whether mutt writes out the Bcc header when preparing
messages to be sent. Exim users may wish to use this.
So I thought this is talking about the menu you get to see
Ben --
The short answer is that, as you state, mutt is extremely correct. You
are not wrong in your understanding, and so you can see that the only
other possibility is that other mailers are wrong in their
implementation. Gee, go figure :-)
In order to communicate with such Outhouse losers,
David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: It may be correct, but it isn't stock :-) Try settin $shell to /sbin/sh,
: which is guaranteed to be completely self-contained. If *that* works,
I am assuming you are asking me to write a wrapper script around
mutt to set the shell. That didn't work.
Marc van Dongen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 27 Sep 2000:
Bruce DeVisser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: And what does :set ?shell return?
shell="/usr/bin/bash"
which is correct.
OK.. And you can get a shell (via a terminal window), so you know the
binary is executable etc.?
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 10:57:14PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
I don't know the exact details (haven't looked at the source), but I
would guess that the way Mutt starts an external program is with the
system() sytem-function-call. If your Mutt can't run programs this
way, then something is
I'd like it from .muttrc
How to sort index ( where I see my mailboxes by alpha ) ? I'd like to
keep other folder sorting methods( some folder by date some by thread ).
while looking at your folder's message headers: o. (Reverse order: O.)
I discovered this (and many other things I wondered
Can you create a minimal mailbox which permits reproducing that
behaviour?
On 2000-09-27 16:51:50 +0100, Adam Huffman wrote:
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 16:51:50 +0100
From: Adam Huffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Core dump for 1.2.5i
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Organization:
Bya godzina 21:43:20 w wtorek 26 wrzesie, gdy do autobusu wsiad kanar
i wrzasn:"Dan Boger!!! Bilecik do kontroli!!!" A on(a) na to:
Set your mutt/gpg to automatically get keys from a keyserver (like
wwwkeys.pgp.net) and then when it encounters a key it doesn't know, it'll
try and get it
DuCharme, Robert muttered:
In my .muttrc, "my_hdr From:" seems to override my set reverse_name heading,
but I want it to be the other way around. I only want the "my_hdr From:"
return address used for new mail and the reverse_name one used for replies.
This is the intented behavior. If you
Mikko Hänninen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: OK.. And you can get a shell (via a terminal window), so you know the
: binary is executable etc.?
I am not exactly sure what you mean. External programs, like knews
can start vim as an external program to compose an email message.
[snip]
: Like
Quoting ?iso-8859-1?Q?Mikko_H=E4nninen?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 15:44:46 +0300
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mikko_H=E4nninen?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sending mail
Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 27 Sep 2000:
Hello.
How to edit the body of the message from the compose menu otherway
than postpone the message?
Thanks
Hans
Marc --
...and then Marc van Dongen said...
% David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
%
% : It may be correct, but it isn't stock :-) Try settin $shell to /sbin/sh,
% : which is guaranteed to be completely self-contained. If *that* works,
%
% I am assuming you are asking me to write a wrapper
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 22:57:14 +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
I don't know the exact details (haven't looked at the source), but I
would guess that the way Mutt starts an external program is with the
system() sytem-function-call.
Mutt has its own implementaion of system() to have better
On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 09:34:46AM +0200, Hans Ginzel wrote:
How to edit the body of the message from the compose menu otherway
than postpone the message?
Hit "e".
Once you've tried that, hit "?". It will list all the commands that are
valid for that menu.
Ben
--
Ben Beuchler
At 22:57 +0300 27 Sep 2000, Mikko Hänninen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For Sun, I don't know what the system call trace program is called --
truss maybe, or was that some other OS? It may not have one
(installed).
truss is correct. I'd probably use:
truss -o /tmp/mutt.truss -f -t exec mutt
59 matches
Mail list logo
