On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:44:50AM +0200, Rocco Rutte
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In-Reply-To claims X but References claims Y. who do I
believe?
I would guess that In-Reply-To will win if present. It's
useless to try repairing broken threading by wild guesses.
And the difference between
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 08:41:22PM +0200, Alain Bench [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mutt 1.4 has wonderfull code for threading: powerfull, versatile,
fast, configurable to everyone's taste, informative (I mean the ?
missing and the * broken). But a little bit fragile: Perhaps too much
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 10:15:12AM -0800, Christopher Swingley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Mutters,
One of the mailing lists I subscribe to uses the Lyris ListManager
software, which attaches '[listname]' to the Subject: line of all
the messages send out. Unlike most list manager software,
Yes, this is the intended behavior. It's because mutt displays the
subject if the parent is not visible or missing, on the theory that who
knows what the parent's subject is.
-Daniel
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 11:05:07PM -0800, Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
David Ellement wrote:
I
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 04:34:58PM +0100, Pablo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I download mutt 1.2.5.1, and want to install on an SCO openserver 5.02.
download , untar were Ok, also configure run OK
but at the moment to execute MAKE INSTALL I got this long listing with a lot of
errors,
Can
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 11:19:43AM -0600, Drew Raines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dominik Mierzejewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What's in the last lines of configure.log?
$ tail -15 config.log
char **argv;
int main() {
return f (e, argv, 0) != argv[0] || f (e, argv, 1) !=
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 11:22:26AM -0800, Brian C. Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am getting the following error when compiling 1.3.28
with gcc 3.0.4 (64-bit) mode.
[...]
gcc -DPKGDATADIR=\/usr/local/share/mutt\ -DSYSCONFDIR=\/usr/local/etc\
-DBINDIR=\/usr/local/bin\
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 10:16:24PM -0800, Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sven Guckes wrote:
mutt does not strive to be popular with everyone. after all, all
those bad mailers were written to *fit* some people - and they
certainly do! so dont take them away from those - they
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 03:20:52PM -0600, tim lupfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
maybe i'm just being an idiot, but what is mutt 1.5.0?
i was not even aware that there was a 1.4 branch yet (a truth to
which i will still attest).
1.5.0 is the head of the CVS repository. There is a 1.4 branch,
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 02:58:20PM +0100, Johannes Franken [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In pager, when I press the d key on a collapsed thread, it only
deletes the first message of that thread. So when I want to delete
the full thread, I always have to press ^D.
How can I have the d key
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 08:46:41PM -0500, Joel Hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is is possible
Yes.
and advantageous
No.
to use vi as an external pager?
Hope this helps. :-) To be a little bit more specific, you lose all of
the mutt highlighting, quote-hiding, pager_index_lines, as well
.
Thanks for the help.
Joel
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 09:10:04PM -0500, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 08:46:41PM -0500, Joel Hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is is possible
Yes.
and advantageous
No.
to use vi as an external pager?
Hope this helps
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 02:52:57PM +, Bruno Postle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu 21-Feb-2002 at 03:28:48PM +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hmm, but how to do this? Sometimes, messages don't contain my
message-id in the References, aren't To: or Cc: me (eg. a message
far down in the
I know you csan do it like this, but it adds an extra function call to
the common case: right now we get by with just one function call except
when the primary sort doesn't match.
Another thing we could do is combine all the sort methods into one big
function with a loop and a case statement.
What OS? Is this by any chance OSF/1 or Digital Unix (or these days
it's Tru64, I guess.)
-Daniel
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 02:50:54PM -0700, Mark Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using jed as an editor with mutt-1.3.25i running in an xterm.
Occasionally, I mistakenly type (the jed
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:53:07PM +0100, Christian Ordig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 10:25:43AM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
sort=thread
sort_aux=subject
sort_aux2=date
implying a fixed number of sort criteria, just more than are
available now.
I've been planning to do this for a while.
It seems to me that the only time that more than two levels of sorting
is useful is when the first level is threads. If anyone can give me a
plausible scenario where they'd want more than three, or more than two
unthreaded, I'll think about my
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 10:25:43AM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Which is more likely to be implemented? (I'm thinking there must have
been a reason for only allowing two criteria in the first place, and it
might have been to avoid the complexity of dealing with an
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 01:31:55PM -0500, darren chamberlain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Eisenbud [EMAIL PROTECTED] said something to this effect on
02/06/2002:
I've been planning to do this for a while.
It seems to me that the only time that more than two levels of
sorting
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 02:49:31PM -0500, Rick Janka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm new to mutt, so if this post violates existing protocol or is in
the wrong group, no doubt I will be notified quickly.
mutt-users is actually a more appropriate list in this case, so I'm
cc'ing this there.
[...]
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 02:20:34PM -0600, Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Feb 06, Daniel Eisenbud [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
I've been planning to do this for a while.
It seems to me that the only time that more than two levels of sorting
is useful is when the first level
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 12:35:14PM -0800, Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry if I missed this in the documentation, but what has changed with
threading from 1.3.24 to 1.3.27? I am finding now that consecutive
posts from the same thread look like seperate messages in the index,
each
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 01:50:23PM -0800, Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
That description isn't enough for me to have any idea what you're
describing. Could you make a small thread and draw (do set ascii_chars
if you want to be able
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 12:08:44PM -0600, David Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just wondering what the real differences were between maildir and
mbox formats? I know mbox is an appended file while maildir is a
separate directory for each mail (each what, exactly)?
What are the
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 09:43:27PM -0500, Samuel Padgett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way to get the Mutt-1.3.24i threading behavior back?
It looks like it changed again in Mutt-1.3.25i. Specifically, I
like seeing the ?'s, but only enough to give me context. Today,
with
This is annoying. I've successfully compiled mutt without iconv by
commenting out lines in config.h, so I think that this is just a
braindead policy decision. Try commenting out the iconv test you quoted
below in configure, and see what happens when you configure and build
without iconv. Also
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 08:29:08AM -0800, Claus Assmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
This is annoying. I've successfully compiled mutt without iconv by
commenting out lines in config.h, so I think that this is just a
braindead policy decision. Try
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 08:05:54PM -0500, Daniel Eisenbud [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The attached patch makes it possible to collapse threads whose root is
missing and whose first present message has no descendants, which was
previously not possible because of an oversight. It also makes
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 06:37:01AM -0500, David T-G
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% 1 foo
% 2 |-?-bar
% 3 | `-baz
% 4 |-grault
% 5 `-quux
%
% if $sort_aux is set to date, it is possible that bar is before grault
% and quux, but baz is after both of them. So with the question mark
%
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 11:01:35AM -0500, Daniel Eisenbud [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 06:37:01AM -0500, David T-G
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% 1 foo
% 2 |-?-bar
% 3 | `-baz
% 4 |-grault
% 5 `-quux
%
% if $sort_aux is set to date, it is possible that bar
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 05:42:36PM -0800, Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
The attached patch makes it possible to collapse threads whose root is
missing and whose first present message has no descendants, which was
previously not possible because
I've been receiving reports of occasional thread sorting crashes. I
believe that these may all occur when we are incrementally resorting the
mailbox, though I don't know for sure, and have been totally unable to
reproduce the problem myself. I will be travelling and unable to work
more on this
The attached patch makes it possible to collapse threads whose root is
missing and whose first present message has no descendants, which was
previously not possible because of an oversight. It also makes the
$hide_missing option much more thorough, making the display much more
like that of
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 08:16:08PM -0500, David T-G
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ken --
...and then Ken Weingold said...
%
% The more I run 1.3.24, the more I am appreciating the multiple '?'s in
...
% Instead of something like -?-?-?-?- , maybe things like -?4?- or the
% like, replacing
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 08:05:54PM -0500, Daniel Eisenbud [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The attached patch makes it possible to collapse threads whose root is
missing and whose first present message has no descendants, which was
previously not possible because of an oversight. It also makes
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 02:50:44PM -0500, David T-G
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% subject. The question mark denotes a missing reference. So if a
This I also understand -- but it seems to be too over-the-top. I've been
known to clear out everything except a final useful message deep in a
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 06:25:03PM -0500, David T-G
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel --
...and then Daniel Eisenbud said...
%
% On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 02:50:44PM -0500, David T-G
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% % subject. The question mark denotes a missing reference. So
Setting $hide_missing (which is set by default) will get rid of some of
them. I should have a patch to do a more thorough job in a day or two.
I'll send it to mutt-users as well as mutt-dev once it's stable, because
of popular demand.
-Daniel
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 07:54:24PM -0500, cruciatuz
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 04:15:08PM +0100, Cristian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mutt folks,
(this idea is for the Mutt developers but since the thread came up
here, I'm continuing here. Btw. -- sorry for my recent duplicate post.
It won't happen again, folder-hook works for me now.)
There
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 02:32:19PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 23:21:27 -0800, Dairy Wall Limey wrote:
hrmm this makes sense... setting this does change the number of '?'s...
putting:
set hide_missing
gives one question mark,
Here, I get
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 02:46:07PM -0800, Owner of many system processes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
$hide_missing only hides the leading message if they can sensibly be
hidden.
sorry... one more thing:
messages that have an asterisk (ie mutt is guessing based
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 11:04:33PM +0100, Andreas Selig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello! I hope anyone of you can help me ...
when I recive a mail that ist signed mutt tells me that the signature
wasn't correct . I already read in the mailinglist several threads but
nothing helped:
I tryed :
You can use an external pager with mutt. This would at least be a good
interim solution. set pager=view or something.
-Daniel
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 08:26:35PM +0100, Christian Schoepplein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I'm a blind computeruser who wants to use mutt. Most things are
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 02:32:39PM -0500, Dan Boger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, a workaround might be instead of viewing messages with enter,
view with 'e' - edit-message. that will open the message in your
defined editor, and you can scroll through it there with the cursor...
when done,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 03:33:36PM +0530, Prahlad Vaidyanathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] spoke thusly:
[...]
set quote_regexp=^([ ?]*([|:}#]|{1,3} |[A-Z]{2,3}))+
The ? should really be \t here. Probably the default should be
changed to have another
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 01:43:00PM -0700, Sean LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MAILDIR=$HOME/Mail/
:0
* ^Subject*\[lug\]*
blug
:0
* ^Subject*\[corrado-l\]*
corrado
:0
* *
Inbox
You _really_ need to change each of the :0 lines to :0: so that
procmail will lock the mailboxes. This
?
-Daniel
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 02:28:42PM -0700, Sean LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 15:42:52 -0500
To: Sean LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Daniel Eisenbud [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mutt Users
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 04:30:16PM -0500, Dan Boger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 02:28:42PM -0700, Sean LeBlanc wrote:
So I cleared the mail file again,
sent another test message from hotmail, removed this line from
the .fetchmailrc: mda procmail, and then ran again.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 09:26:15AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Horst mutt [11/11/01 21:29 -0600]:
If I edit a signed email with vim, it is littered with '=' and '=20'
characters (at end-of-line). I was curious as to what these might be,
and whether there
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 03:50:46PM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 11:48:59AM -0600, David Champion (dis)graced my inbox with:
For example, in your .exrc:
map v {j0!}fmt -w72ctrl-v ctrl-m
This makes v reformat the current paragraph to 72
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 12:23:15PM +0530, Prahlad Vaidyanathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, but I tried something like this before, and the problem
remains. The problem is, it colours
the super-quoted lines in the colour assigned to 'quoted1'
(brightblack in my case), and not 'quoted'
In general, after applying patches, you should do make clean before
recompiling. See if that helps.
-Daniel
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 01:25:15PM -0800, Ryan Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dunno if anybody else has seen this or not...and I didn't see anything
in the archives. I compiled 1.3.23i
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 03:55:51PM +0600, Andrey R. Urazov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sometimes I receive letters which contain undisplayable characters which
affect my terminal state. After displaying such a message on the screen
the terminal refuses to delete anything from the screen and this
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 02:10:11PM -0500, Paul Ackersviller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 06:26:20AM -0500, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
eterm implements some of the xterm mouse stuff (same as rxvt and aterm).
It's possible that konsole (KDE) does also, but they don't
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 09:16:46PM -0500, David T-G
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But that would put mutt before kmail, which isn't what he wanted :-)
And it would also put irrelevant before mutt, which is why maybe it's
time to take this off-list for anyone who still cares.
-Daniel
--
Daniel E.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 08:55:20AM -0800, Michael Montagne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The threaded view in that mutt offers for viewing mailing list messages
is very cool. I haven't performed many modifications to the stock
install. Every so often an asterisk will appear in the branch to the
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 01:02:26PM -0400, Jeremy Hankins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mh, of course, has an rmmproc, which I redefined to move messages to the
archive folder rather than deleting them. If possible, I'd like to do
something similar in mutt, so that I can use all the delete stuff
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 04:01:56PM -0400, Daniel Eisenbud [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 01:02:26PM -0400, Jeremy Hankins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mh, of course, has an rmmproc, which I redefined to move messages to the
archive folder rather than deleting them
I believe it's supposed to be a very small, not very configurable IMAP
client.
-Daniel
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 03:35:40PM -0700, Igor Pruchanskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just saw this conversation on irc
NetSkier kate: The mutt developer is working on pup, Son of Mutt.
kate Jeopardy:
As far as GUI programs go, xbuffy is great (and doesn't have a problem
with unread messages that aren't new.) It surely wouldn't be too hard
to write a curses or even simply text front end to its mailbox code
(which is the hard part.) Note that I'm not volunteering to do this,
though.
-Daniel
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 02:14:25PM -0400, Matt Spong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any documentation for mutt 1.3.x floating around? All the docs
I've found seem to be for 1.2.5...
The mutt 1.3.x distribution contains a manual for mutt 1.3.x.
-Daniel
--
Daniel E. Eisenbud
[EMAIL
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 11:09:55AM -0400, David T-G
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...and then Ken Weingold said...
% Why is it that in the mutt pager, all I saw from Suresh's email was:
%
% [-- Error: unable to create PGP subprocess! --]
% -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Probably because mutt
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 02:07:44PM +0200, Matthias LOITSCH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 07:29:20AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
Are you sure that mutt doesn't recognize it? If the References: field
contains only Message-IDs from messages not in your mailbox, then mutt
will
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 09:37:52PM -0400, David T-G
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you seen Cedric Duval's edit_threads patch? It seems that it might
be related to some of this sort of thing.
I just looked at it. Cool! I mused at least once that this feature
would be nice, but I never did
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 03:29:16PM +0100, Erik van der Meulen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a large inbox archive file, that seems to be a little corrupt.
One or two odd entries and mutt will open it, but can't seem to close it
again. Is there anything to check op repair these files?
If
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 01:13:12PM -0500, Timberwolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Daniel:
Where is the standard for line wrapping limits set? Is that in an
RFC? If so, can you point me to the RFC that lays out the proper
form for outbound message character wrapping.
I don't know if it's in
.
highlight_unread will do it ...
"color index fgcolor bgcolor ~N" doesn't work for you? "~O" might be
necessary if you use mark_old. But this works wonderfully for me.
Or "~U" should cover both old and new unread messages.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Eisenbud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the world. This was the attitude among
the developers from day one, and I think it should stay that way.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Eisenbud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Eisenbud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ssage
(eg mailinglist commands, test messages, etc). If I really meant to
cancel the message I can still use 'q' to abort.
Add the following line to your .muttrc:
set abort_unmodified=no
-Daniel
--
Daniel Eisenbud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
think the conclusion was that scoring would
have to be moved to a different pass than reading the messages for this
to work. He didn't seem against the idea, IIRC, but I don't think
anybody cared enough to actually do it.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Eisenbud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
them post
the output of "mutt -v"? This is in general good practice when
reporting a problem,
-Daniel
--
Daniel Eisenbud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
m with 0.95.4i.
Can anyone help?
-Robert
--
--- \*/ ---
Robert S. Dubinski, Computer Systems Technician, MSCS Dept. Marquette University
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.mscs.mu.edu/~tech
--
Daniel Eisenbud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
compose a message.
my_hdr Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mutt also honors the REPLYTO environment variable (or it might be
REPLY_TO, I forget.) I think the my_hdr command would take precedence,
but I don't remember for sure.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Eisenbud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
You mean for POP authentication? Mutt doesn't currently do that at all.
Probably a good solution is to use fetchmail instead of mutt's POP
support.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Eisenbud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 10:01:26AM +0100, Klaus Wacker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 1999 at 02:37:08AM -0800, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 1999 at 10:58:36AM +0100, Klaus Wacker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As long as I have been using various versions of mutt under AIX
uot;. Mutt
doesn't dump core, it just seems to ignore the resizeing.
On some systems, at least, you have to link against SLang or a recent
ncurses for this to work.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Eisenbud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ronald L. Johnson
Sr. Systems and Networks Administrator, Perl Addict
MERL - A Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratory
http://www.merl.com
--
Daniel Eisenbud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rious sync functions into two parts, but I don't know if
this change justifies that. I will think about this a little bit more.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Eisenbud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
}
+ for (i = 0; i ctx-msgcount; i++)
+if (ctx-hdrs[i]-deleted)
+ mutt_append_message(trash, ctx, ctx-hdrs[i], 0, CH_UPDATE_LEN);
+ mx_close_mailbox(trash);
+}
+ }
+
switch (ctx-magic)
{
case M_MBOX:
Common subdirectories: mutt-0.94.3i/rx and mutt-0.94.3i-trash/rx
--
Daniel Eisenbud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
t. I once installed mutt on a system with this variable set
in the default .cshrc, and it took me a while to figure out what was
going on. If that's not it, check the global Muttrc and see if that's
doing it. Otherwise I don't know.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Eisenbud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
it after this post unless I
have something new to say. :-)
Daniel Eisenbud [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
mutt-dev _has_ to be open or at least have legitimate posts from
non-subscribers forwarded to it in a timely manner. Why? Because every
You really have yet to show
On Fri, Feb 12, 1999 at 10:38:57PM -0500, rfi from Rich Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 05, 1999 at 11:25:56PM -0800, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
This whole mailing list situation is really silly. When Michael Elkins
ran the lists at Harvey Mudd College, they were open
ve the messages marked as "Old"?
TIA...
Put "set mark_old" in your .muttrc, and you should be all set.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Eisenbud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Feb 09, 1999 at 10:35:08AM +, Steve Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 07:26:42PM -0800, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 06:14:26PM -0800, Joe Rhett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I realize that most of you have filters which keep you from seeing
, and then to you. Steve, could you
remove this subscriber from the list and ask them to fix their setup
before resubscribing?
-Daniel
--
Daniel Eisenbud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Feb 05, 1999 at 05:42:06PM -0800, Joe Rhett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 09:47:49PM -0800, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 09:34:52PM -0800, Joe Rhett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah.. so should every user get put in here? Should sendmail
.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Eisenbud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c approach to doing exactly what he needs.
What makes it not the right approach? Yes, there are other perfectly
good ways of doing this, and no this was not the one you thought of
first, but it gets the job done rather well, it seems.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Eisenbud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
solution is a
perfectly good one. Get off your high horse.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Eisenbud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 04, 1999 at 01:26:10AM -0800, Daniel Eisenbud
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is generally a good idea, but I just wanted to caution people that
if someone sends you mail from a broken mailer that generates the same
message-id more than once, this will throw away legitimate mail. I
urning off the authentication warnings for them. I might be
wrong...
-Daniel
--
Daniel Eisenbud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jan 25, 1999 at 02:17:00PM -0700, Phil Humpherys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How sophisticated is scoring in mutt? I didn't see anything in the
help menu... is there decent scoring in mutt?
Have you tried reading the manual yet? There is a whole section
about it.
-Daniel
--
Daniel
93 matches
Mail list logo
