-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all
I've been noticing that when Mutt encounters a clearsigned pgp signiture
that I'm not getting the little 's' flag in the index and I don't seem
to be able to validate the signiture in anyway.
What's all that about then?
Many thanks
- --
Hi All
Does mutt come with ssl support? Here is my setup. My mail is sent to another machine
on my network. To access it I ssh to that other box and then read my mail. The problem
is when I want to attach files from my machine I have to scp them to the other machine
and the same applies for
* Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [21-01-2002 09:23]:
I've been noticing that when Mutt encounters a clearsigned pgp signiture
that I'm not getting the little 's' flag in the index and I don't seem
to be able to validate the signiture in anyway.
Check out:
EscP
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 10:28:34AM +0200, Theo Bierman wrote:
Hi All
Does mutt come with ssl support? Here is my setup. My mail is sent to
Yes. At least you can enable it at compile/configure time.
It's something like --enable-ssl
another machine on my network. To access it I ssh to that
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 09:36:52AM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 10:28:34AM +0200, Theo Bierman wrote:
Hi All
Does mutt come with ssl support? Here is my setup. My mail is sent to
Yes. At least you can enable it at compile/configure time.
It's something like
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 11:05:35AM +0200, Theo Bierman wrote:
I downloaded mutt-1.3.25i.tar.gz and ran ./configure --enable-ssl and got the
following error:
configure: error: no curses library found
is this because mutt-1.3.25i.tar.gz does not support it?
No, this is because your
Andreas Herceg wrote:
OK, I did not know that X-Label is that common. Now I thought
of just defining 'X-Coprija: coprija'.
Now I would like to know if this would be against some standard
which I do not know.
Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] replied:
my understanding is that X headers are
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 10:14:18AM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 11:05:35AM +0200, Theo Bierman wrote:
I downloaded mutt-1.3.25i.tar.gz and ran ./configure --enable-ssl and got the
following error:
configure: error: no curses library found
is this
Andreas --
...and then Andreas Herceg said...
%
% On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 08:11:18PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% |
% | No, X-* is for defining your own headers, and there is no end to the list
% | of them :-)
%
% That is exactly what I thought.
%
% | It's simply that mutt specifically
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 12:01:44PM +0200, Theo Bierman wrote:
{imap.web.de/ssl}
Have you tried this before upgrading?
Please forgive my ignorance, but what exactly do I have to do?
OK.
1) Press c (for change mailbox)
2) As mailboxname, enter
{servername/ssl}
3) Then mutt
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 09:39:52PM -0500, Derek D. Martin wrote:
But how does it compare to mbox on the same FS? I'll bet it's still
significantly slower.
opening times might be ... but think about updating times and the
no locking needed goodies :-)
--
Christian Ordig
Germany
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 06:45:54PM -0800 I heard the voice of
Michael Elkins, and lo! it spake thus:
Mutt attempts to compensate for this by using quoted-printable encoding when
it detects things that might break a signature, thus escaping the problem.
But yes, mbox format is more
On 2002-01-19 01:56:56 -0800, A Guy Called Tyketto wrote:
bradl@bellicha:/usr/local/src/mail/mutt gpg mutt-1.3.26i.tar.gz.asc
gpg: Warning: using insecure memory!
gpg: Signature made Fri 18 Jan 2002 03:45:17 AM PST using RSA key ID CE6AC6C1
gpg: BAD signature from Thomas Roessler [EMAIL
* Derek D. Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
At some point hitherto, Will Yardley hath spake thusly:
our office mail machine is (unfortunately) linux with ext2, and i
can attest to the fact that Maildir is pretty slow on ext2.
And most other filesystems... Try it on FAT. =8^)
I think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone.
I've been looking through the docs and can't find what controls the
Reply-To header. I want to set folder-hooks for some mailing lists I
subscribe to where the users are inclined to hit the 'reply button' in
Outhouse rather than send to
David T-G muttered:
% how can i use close-hook and append-hook for tar.gz maildirs?
You can't use append-hook; tar doesn't support appending (or at least not
in any form that I've ever seen actually work, contrary to the promises
made by the -a switch).
Quoting tar's man page:
-r,
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 at 12:43:26 +0100, Nick Wilson wrote:
Hi everyone.
I've been looking through the docs and can't find what controls the
Reply-To header. I want to set folder-hooks for some mailing lists I
subscribe to where the users are inclined to hit the 'reply button' in
Outhouse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 13:15
* Ken Wahl said
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 12:43:26PM +0100, Nick Wilson wrote:
Hi everyone.
I've been looking through the docs and can't find what controls the
Reply-To header. I want to set folder-hooks for some
* Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-01-21 13:51]:
[...]
Certainly seems to be it although I'm having a little trouble getting it
to work. I keep getting a 'error missing parameter in line 316' (first
line of the code below)
send-hook . my_hdr Reply-To: Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 14:12
* Im Eunjea said
* Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-01-21 13:51]:
[...]
Certainly seems to be it although I'm having a little trouble getting it
to work. I keep getting a 'error missing parameter in line
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 05:25:56PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
Remember that for many blind users these messages are being spoken
to the reader by a voder. Where it's merely inconsiderate to not trim
quotations when replying ordinarily, when replying to a blind user it
becomes outright
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 11:15:33AM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 12:01:44PM +0200, Theo Bierman wrote:
{imap.web.de/ssl}
Have you tried this before upgrading?
Please forgive my ignorance, but what exactly do I have to do?
OK.
1) Press c (for
* Dave Price ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 05:25:56PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
Where it's merely inconsiderate to not trim quotations when replying
ordinarily, when replying to a blind user it becomes outright rude.
Learn to use your screenreader better, and
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 03:32:18PM +0200, Theo Bierman wrote:
Downloaded mutt-1.3.26, I have installed ncurses, slang and
openssl. Then ran ./configure --enable-imap --with-ssl and I'm
getting an error as follows:
checking for X509_new in -lcrypto... no
configure: error: Unable to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 14:40
* Thomas Hurst said
* Dave Price ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 05:25:56PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
Where it's merely inconsiderate to not trim quotations when replying
ordinarily,
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 03:32:18PM +0200, Theo Bierman wrote:
I'm using debian right, so I did not download the tar.gz for openssl,
I just ran a apt-get install openssl and it installed
openssl_0.9.4-5_i386.deb. So whether it can find libcrypto I don't
know, should I be using a diffeent
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 02:42:59PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 03:32:18PM +0200, Theo Bierman wrote:
Downloaded mutt-1.3.26, I have installed ncurses, slang and
openssl. Then ran ./configure --enable-imap --with-ssl and I'm
getting an error as follows:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 02:43:27PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 03:32:18PM +0200, Theo Bierman wrote:
I'm using debian right, so I did not download the tar.gz for openssl,
I just ran a apt-get install openssl and it installed
openssl_0.9.4-5_i386.deb. So whether
Dave Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/01/2002 (14:25) :
Learn to use your screenreader better, and teach it to ignore or skip
over quote chars at the start of a new line.
There is no point in sending a load of quoted stuff to anybody. Cut it
down to relevant part before you send. This is
Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/01/2002 (14:47) :
people did that they don't that would make my life easier. However, if
we spend all our time worrying about every minority
problem/consideration we'll never get *anything* done :)
Is it not a minority problem.
Preben
--
() Join
* Nick Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
* On 21-01-02 at 14:40
* Thomas Hurst said
Being able to skip quotes is no excuse not to trim them; not caring
whether people will simply ignore your message because it appears to
have no content isn't either.
How do you tell if you are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 15:08
* Preben Randhol said
Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/01/2002 (14:47) :
people did that they don't that would make my life easier. However, if
we spend all our time worrying about every minority
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 15:38
* Thomas Hurst said
* Nick Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
How do you tell if you are sending to a blind user?
You don't; quoting properly has nothing to do with who you're sending
to, it's just basic email
Michael --
...and then Michael Tatge said...
%
% David T-G muttered:
% % how can i use close-hook and append-hook for tar.gz maildirs?
%
% You can't use append-hook; tar doesn't support appending (or at least not
% in any form that I've ever seen actually work, contrary to the promises
%
At some point hitherto, Thomas Hurst hath spake thusly:
* Derek D. Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
At some point hitherto, Will Yardley hath spake thusly:
our office mail machine is (unfortunately) linux with ext2, and i
can attest to the fact that Maildir is pretty slow on ext2.
* David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
...and then Michael Tatge said...
Quoting tar's man page:
-r, --append append files to the end of an archive
Works like charm.
No kidding! I've never seen one work. What version of tar are you
running?
It should work fine provided tar
At some point hitherto, Dave Price hath spake thusly:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 05:25:56PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
to the reader by a voder. Where it's merely inconsiderate to not trim
quotations when replying ordinarily, when replying to a blind user it
becomes outright rude.
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Theo Bierman wrote:
Downloaded mutt-1.3.26, I have installed ncurses, slang and openssl. Then ran
./configure --enable-imap --with-ssl and I'm getting an error as follows:
checking for X509_new in -lcrypto... no
configure: error: Unable to find SSL library
I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 16:47
* Derek D. Martin said
Learn to use your screenreader better, and teach it to ignore or skip
over quote chars at the start of a new line.
That's a pretty inconsiderate attitude to take, and doesn't solve the
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Theo Bierman wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 02:42:59PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 03:32:18PM +0200, Theo Bierman wrote:
You need to install openssl-dev as well :)
(and ncurses-dev etc.)
tried an apt-get install
At some point hitherto, Nick Wilson hath spake thusly:
* On 21-01-02 at 15:08
* Preben Randhol said
Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/01/2002 (14:47) :
people did that they don't that would make my life easier. However, if
we spend all our time worrying about every
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Nick Wilson wrote:
Certainly seems to be it although I'm having a little trouble getting it
to work. I keep getting a 'error missing parameter in line 316' (first
line of the code below)
send-hook . my_hdr Reply-To: Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
send-hook ~t [EMAIL
At 04:50 AM 1/21/02 -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
Personally, I use maildir for all my 'active' mailboxes (read: the ones
that mail gets delivered to and I read) because it's that much safer,
easier and more efficient to alter, and roughly similar in speed to open.
I use mbox for my archive
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 17:02
* Knute said
You have your quotes in the wrong place. Try this:
send-hook ~[EMAIL PROTECTED] my_hdr Reply-To: Mutt-Users
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
They way you had it, was telling mutt to only look in the to
Hi Jeremy and others,
http://www.symonds.net/~prahladv/mutt.html
is back up after a long hiatus. Sorry, but I was having trouble ssh-ing
to the server, and was too busy to figure it out :-(
Anyway, I will update it as and when something cool turns up. Meanwhile,
do send in links to apps you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 16:58
* Derek D. Martin said
Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/01/2002 (14:47) :
people did that they don't that would make my life easier. However, if
we spend all our time worrying about every minority
Michael Elkins wrote:
I'd be curious to get some feedback on my header caching patch for maildir
folders (can be found at http://www.sigpipe.org:8080/mutt/).
ok a little more feedback. overall performance is a little zippier, but
if i leave a folder open and it receives messages, i get the
Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/01/2002 (17:20) :
[snipped away several quotes that should have been cut down in the
previous post]
And there's where we differ, my point was just that the line above where
preben decided to quote me was rather important. Is that where the
hostile
Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/01/2002 (16:50) :
I think the quote is taken a little out of context.
Bandwidth's a bugger on mailing lists huh?
If you get about 1000 overquoted mails a day, it is.
Preben
--
() Join the worldwide campaign to protect fundamental human rights.
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 12:35:15PM -0600, David Champion wrote:
This message is in enriched text. Here's some text in boldfaced type.
Here's italic. You can also do formatting -- you can
everything works for me (mutt 1.3.25) but the italic (i saw it
underlined) and justified text (which was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 17:41
* Preben Randhol said
Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/01/2002 (17:20) :
And there's where we differ, my point was just that the line above where
preben decided to quote me was rather important. Is that
At some point hitherto, Nick Wilson hath spake thusly:
* On 21-01-02 at 16:58
* Derek D. Martin said
[Preben said:]
Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/01/2002 (14:47) :
people did that they don't that would make my life easier. However, if
we spend all our time
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 18:07
* Derek D. Martin said
If you're not following the thread, but you suddenly decide it's
important, GO BACK AND READ THE THREAD! You've already received the
e-mails, so you should have them. If you don't, there's
Andy --
...and then Andy Davidson said...
%
% At 04:50 AM 1/21/02 -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
%
% Personally, I use maildir for all my 'active' mailboxes (read: the ones
...
% I use mbox for my archive mailboxes, because it's simpler and more compact
...
%
% I am in the process of
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% I agree, I've been agreeing all along, I'm not sure where I've picked up
% the 'Nick believes in over-quoting' badge. Not true, not true.
Come, Nick... Join me... Join the dark side and piss off everyone on
the mutt-users list... I am your father!
On 2002.01.21, in 20020121164625.GB2845@neuromancer,
giorgian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 12:35:15PM -0600, David Champion wrote:
This message is in enriched text. Here's some text in boldfaced type.
Here's italic. You can also do formatting -- you can
Nick, et al --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% * On 21-01-02 at 18:07
% * Derek D. Martin said
%
% If you're not following the thread, but you suddenly decide it's
% important, GO BACK AND READ THE THREAD! You've already received the
% e-mails, so you should have them. If you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 18:27
* David T-G said
% I agree, I've been agreeing all along, I'm not sure where I've picked up
% the 'Nick believes in over-quoting' badge. Not true, not true.
Come, Nick... Join me... Join the dark side and piss off
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Nick Wilson hath spake thusly:
If you're not following the thread, but you suddenly decide it's
important, GO BACK AND READ THE THREAD! You've already received the
e-mails, so you should have them. If you don't,
At some point hitherto, David T-G hath spake thusly:
% Disagree, all this GO BACK AND READ THE THREAD! nonsense is insulting.
% Of course I've been reading the thread.
I don't think the comment is directed at you; we know you've been
reading. I think that the argument is that leaving in
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% * On 21-01-02 at 18:27
% * David T-G said
%
% % the 'Nick believes in over-quoting' badge. Not true, not true.
%
% Come, Nick... Join me... Join the dark side and piss off everyone on
% the mutt-users list... I am your father!
%
% Haha,
* Cameron Simpson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
| Anyone have ideas on how to get this to work? (NOTE: my home machine
| uses BASH and I'm using tcsh here at work if that makes any difference).
|
| That's the problem, the `for file in...` bit is run with whatever your
| default shell is, and
Carl --
...and then Carl B. Constantine said...
%
% * Cameron Simpson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
% | Anyone have ideas on how to get this to work? (NOTE: my home machine
...
% | That's the problem, the `for file in...` bit is run with whatever your
% | default shell is, and that's won't
I wrote:
% And it appears that the archive mailboxes *have* to be mboxes.
% If I try to save a message to an existing maildir folder, mutt objects.
At 12:17 PM 1/21/02 -0500, David T-G wrote:
Um, that shouldn't be the case. mutt will happily read and write mbox,
Maildir, MMDF, and MH
Derek D. Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/01/2002 (18:05) :
See above where Preben said this is not a minority problem. He was
refering to the fact that it is a much BROADER problem than just one
that affects minorities. Your comment is irrelevant to that argument.
(Preben: please
On 14:45 21 Jan 2002, Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| That would still leave you with a truckload of repeated and mostly
| irrelevent cruft, and not only for someone using a screenreader.
|
| Being able to skip quotes is no excuse not to trim them; not caring
| whether people will
On 09:59 21 Jan 2002, Carl B. Constantine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| * Cameron Simpson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
| | Anyone have ideas on how to get this to work? (NOTE: my home machine
| | uses BASH and I'm using tcsh here at work if that makes any difference).
| |
| | That's the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 22:15
* Cameron Simpson said
|
| How do you tell if you are sending to a blind user?
You can't. It's rude anyway. The amount of time you spend trimming stuff
Rude to do what? I don't follow you.
to just the relevant
So sprach »Benjamin Michotte« am 2002-01-20 um 19:33:10 +0100 :
What are the benefits of using one type over the other?
opening a mbox with ± 7000 mails : less than 10 seconds.
opening the same in Maildir : 3 minutes...
With mutt, I get the same kind of results. However, other MUAs behave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 22:29
* Nick Wilson said
Seeing as the sender of these next few lines didn't seem to want to send
them to the list. Here they are in all thier glory.
- ---
Funny that your reply on 'not trimming' was hardly (if at
So sprach »Christian Ordig« am 2002-01-21 um 11:22:04 +0100 :
opening times might be ... but think about updating times and the
Well, that's true, however, updating times aren't *that* important for
me. When I receive new mail, I let procmail sort it into appropriate
mailfiles; each list has
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [21-01-2002 18:56]:
[to Nick]
You should change your quote char. I'd find '@' particularly annoying,
and nobody is using it yet.
I've finally come to my senses; changed from '| ' to ' '. Now it's up
to that other pagan, David, to change ;)
--
René Clerc
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 09:32:49AM +0100, Ren Clerc wrote:
that I'm not getting the little 's' flag in the index and I don't seem
to be able to validate the signiture in anyway.
Check out:
EscPcheck-traditional-pgp
Ok, and how about validating 'normal' (mime) signatures on
* Nick Wilson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] on [21-01-02] wrote:
Seeing as the sender of these next few lines didn't seem to want to send
them to the list. Here they are in all thier glory.
I got this email, did you bounce it to mutt-users as well?
I'm sorry guys but I feel that my messages are
* On 21-01-02 at 23:04
* René Clerc said
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [21-01-2002 18:56]:
[to Nick]
You should change your quote char. I'd find '@' particularly annoying,
and nobody is using it yet.
Reckon there could be a reason there David. Hehe.
I've finally come to my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 23:17
* Brian Foley said
Some of the more extreme past members of this list would have blasted
you out of the water for:
a) using a two-line attribution at the top of all your quotes
Oops, I just thought it looked neater
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 21-01-02 at 23:17
* Brian Foley said
I got this email, did you bounce it to mutt-users as well?
Yes, sorry about that I thought it would just end up in the thread where
it belonged.
- --
Nick Wilson
Tel:+45 3325 0688
Fax:+45
* Nick Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 21. 2002 17:17]:
You think that'll happen? I like the @ idea but I think or could be
pretty bad too.
Oh no, that's not the worst. I've seen something like this on this list
in the past, *in jest*, in a similar thread:
This line is quoted text
Mutt Users,
I'm trying to get a uniform look and feel to mutt on 3 machines, all running
Debian. Version is 1.3.25i.
The folder_format is set to the standard
%F %-8.8u %-8.8g %d %8s %N %f
on all three machines, yet the %N value only shows up on one of them
when I do c ? to the see the
Alas! Nick Wilson spake thus:
How do you tell if you are sending to a blind user?
Are you blind??
--
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
People who think MS-DOS and Windows are the slickest thing since
sliced butter should be forced to wear a sign stating This mind
intentionally left
Alas! Nick Wilson spake thus:
* On 21-01-02 at 23:17 Brian Foley said
Some of the more extreme past members of this list would have
blasted you out of the water for: a) using a two-line attribution at
the top of all your quotes
Oops, I just thought it looked neater as it was a
Brian Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] [21 Jan 2002 17:56 -0500]:
I've seen something like this on this list in the past, *in
jest*, in a similar thread:
This line is quoted text
This line is quoted text
Emacs and Pine both support per-message quote characters. I
think the idea is to choose
* Jonathan Irving ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 21. 2002 18:57]:
[...]
Emacs and Pine both support per-message quote characters. I
think the idea is to choose something that identifies the person,
like:
Hehe, no no, I meant *that exact quote prefix* :-) It'd take me forever
to find the thread
Brian Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] [21 Jan 2002 19:04 -0500]:
* Jonathan Irving ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 21. 2002 18:57]:
Emacs and Pine both support per-message quote characters. I
think the idea is to choose something that identifies the person,
like:
Hehe, no no, I meant *that exact
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 10:37:01PM +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote:
running reiserfs.
well ... as tests showed, ReiserFS seems to be a _really_ slow
beast when it comes to read Maildir folders ... tried with Ext2/3?
Should be really faster.
--
Christian Ordig
Germany
On 13:53 13 Nov 2001, Andy Spiegl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Just a quick question:
| Is there a unix tool to convert something like this
| Subject: Para =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Carlos_Lavalle_?=
| into this
| Subject: Para José Carlos Lavalle
Procmail can be used for this:
: 0hc
On 23:05 09 Nov 2001, Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On 2001-11-09 13:03:36 -0600, Peter Horst wrote:
| Is anonymous checkout of the mutt CVS allowed? If so, what is the
| procedure? I couldn't find a single reference to it in the list
| archives, and the directions given at the
Alas! Brian Clark spake thus:
I've used clients like TheBat! before that do it as you've pointed out
below:
BCThis line is quoted text
BCThis line is quoted text
TheBat! is by far the best windows mail program I've seen (unless mutt
is available for windows and I don't know about
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Nick Croft wrote:
Mutt Users,
I'm trying to get a uniform look and feel to mutt on 3 machines, all running
Debian. Version is 1.3.25i.
The folder_format is set to the standard
%F %-8.8u %-8.8g %d %8s %N %f
on all three machines, yet the %N value only shows up on
At some point hitherto, René Clerc hath spake thusly:
I've finally come to my senses; changed from '| ' to ' '. Now it's up
to that other pagan, David, to change ;)
And there was much rejoicing... ;-)
--
Derek Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At some point hitherto, Alexander Skwar hath spake thusly:
The Maildir/mbox I tested, had 84.533 messages and about 321 MB. Opening
Eh? How does one have .533 messages in a mailbox? Perhaps fractional
messages are some feature of Maildir that I was unaware of?
Um... Oh, are you European?
_Replying to a message_
By: Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mutt Users' List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On: Monday, January 21, 2002, 16:54:47 -0700
Re: blind etiquette Re: mutt for blind computerusers
Alas! Nick Wilson spake thus:
* On 21-01-02 at 23:17 Brian Foley said
I think it
No, the most annoying way is to indent using spaces, with Outlook style
replies (i.e, 2-3 lines right at the top of the message). Nice huh? :)
Several times I've found myself reading the quoted text thinking it's
the actual reply and wondering why it looks so familiar..
* Brian Clark ([EMAIL
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 21. 2002 20:05]:
TheBat! is by far the best windows mail program I've seen (unless mutt
is available for windows and I don't know about it). It sure beats
Netscape Mail or LookOut, anyway.
Yes, it's a good client. I used SecureBat! with the iKey
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 09:26:55PM -0500 I heard the voice of
Derek D. Martin, and lo! it spake thus:
Um... Oh, are you European? I seem to recall that Europeans switch
the meaning of '.' and ',' in numbers, as compared to us US types...
So perhaps you meant eighty-four thousand five
Hi Cameron,
On 13:53 13 Nov 2001, Andy Spiegl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Just a quick question:
| Is there a unix tool to convert something like this
| Subject: Para =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Carlos_Lavalle_?=
| into this
| Subject: Para José Carlos Lavalle
Procmail can be used for this:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 09:37:55PM -0500, Samuel Padgett wrote:
I'm considering switching to IMAP. How good is Mutt as an IMAP
client? I'm currently just accessing local mbox files directly,
but I'd like to be able to access my mail from other machines.
I use IMAP to access the Exchange
Hi,
How to make some header like this:
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i
X-Face:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 01:41:09PM +0700, budsz wrote:
Hi,
How to make some header like this:
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i
X-Face:
99 matches
Mail list logo
