Re: REMOVE ME FROM THIS LIST

2014-02-23 Thread Jim Graham
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 06:31:28PM -0800, ga...@garryricketsonartworks.org wrote: At first I asked nicely, but this BS is getting on my nerves. REMOVE ME FROM THIS LIST! Why are you reminding yourself and bitching at yourself for the fact that you haven't removed yourself from the list

Re: Download multiple attachments at once

2013-08-04 Thread Jim Graham
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:44:44AM -0500, David Champion wrote: * On 30 Jul 2013, James Griffin wrote: David, out of curiosity, how do you get voicemail sent to your email server? I have home VoIP service, and the provider (Megapath, formerly known as Speakeasy) has this as a built-in

Re: can not get mail from mail list which are send by myself

2013-01-10 Thread Jim Graham
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 05:56:15PM +, Grant Edwards wrote: On 2013-01-10, Jim Graham spooky1...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:57:03AM -0500, Mark H. Wood wrote: On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 01:59:22PM -0600, Jim Graham wrote: [snip] Btw, port 587 is one of those that I said

Re: can not get mail from mail list which are send by myself

2013-01-09 Thread Jim Graham
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 05:33:02PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote: * Jim Graham spooky1...@gmail.com [01-08-13 13:38]: [...] Just be advised, this will result in SPF=NEUTRAL or SPF=FAIL (usually neutral, from what I've seen). Depending on the settings for the list you're on (as well

Re: can not get mail from mail list which are send by myself

2013-01-09 Thread Jim Graham
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 11:54:57AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote: * Alexander Gattin xr...@yandex.ru [01-09-13 11:23]: On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 09:50:59AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote: that way 10 years ago. SMTP servers no longer accept users' mail at port 25, but tend to do this at

Re: can not get mail from mail list which are send by myself

2013-01-09 Thread Jim Graham
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 12:42:42PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote: * Jim Graham spooky1...@gmail.com [01-09-13 12:25]: On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 11:54:57AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote: * Alexander Gattin xr...@yandex.ru [01-09-13 11:23]: On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 09:50:59AM -0500, Patrick

Re: can not get mail from mail list which are send by myself

2013-01-09 Thread Jim Graham
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 03:05:17PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote: * Jim Graham spooky1...@gmail.com [01-09-13 15:02]: But you are not limited to port 25 for outgoing mail. Assign a higher port, 1024. You mean a port like, say, port 587, which I have had configured for no, 1024

Re: can not get mail from mail list which are send by myself

2013-01-08 Thread Jim Graham
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 08:04:05AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote: * horseriver horseriv...@gmail.com [01-08-13 06:16]: I can not receive mails which are sent by myself to a mail list . If you want to see the list mail you post, use a different smtp agent, ie: your own isp, and use your

Re: Difficulty with html-mail

2012-12-19 Thread Jim Graham
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 04:12:55PM -0500, Alan McConnell wrote: I call up mutt from one of my terms(URxvt) and it displays my E-mail from /var/spool/mail/alan, as is normal. With many of my mails I press 'v' to get a display like I 1 no description

Re: HTML-only e-mail (WAS [the near-endless line-length thread])

2012-12-10 Thread Jim Graham
Changing the subject so this (hopefully) doesn't restart the endless thread. On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 06:27:42AM -0500, Rich Kulawiec wrote: On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 06:44:35PM -0600, Jim Graham wrote: If you keep track, you'll probably find, as I have, that HTML-only e-mail is between 99

Re: Please set your line wrap to a sane value (was ... Re: Is there any gmane.org user in the list?)

2012-12-10 Thread Jim Graham
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 02:33:56PM +0200, Nikola Petrov wrote: What about clients that you are doing support for? That's so easy to handle, I'm surprised to see it asked (at least, if you're using procmail). You create two (or more) rc files for procmail. For example, I have a setup that

Re: Please set your line wrap to a sane value (was ... Re: Is there any gmane.org user in the list?)

2012-11-30 Thread Jim Graham
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:57:50AM -0500, Mark H. Wood wrote: I don't think it was about sending mail through a .gmail address; it was about using the GMail web thingy to compose the mail being sent, People actually USE that POS!? The e-mail lists (now only one left) that I've created all

Re: Please set your line wrap to a sane value (was ... Re: Is there any gmane.org user in the list?)

2012-11-30 Thread Jim Graham
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 06:20:00PM +, Grant Edwards wrote: I killfiled all postings from google groups years ago... Well, I suppose you'll never be on my list, then (it's a support and announcement type list for the freeware hurricane tracker (JStrack) that I wrote back in ca. 1996, and

Re: Please set your line wrap to a sane value (was ... Re: Is there any gmane.org user in the list?)

2012-11-30 Thread jim graham
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 02:12:03AM +, Grant Edwards wrote: On 2012-11-30, Jim Graham spooky1...@gmail.com wrote: announcement type list for the freeware hurricane tracker (JStrack) [] It's a google groups list. If needed I can change the killfile rule so that it doesn't apply

Re: Please set your line wrap to a sane value (was ... Re: Is there any gmane.org user in the list?)

2012-11-30 Thread Jim Graham
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:15:42PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote: Yahoo now requires posting from a yahoo account via their smtp or from their web service, since last year some time. I have dropped all but one group, but only read. I refuse to use their web service. Strange...because one of

Re: Please set your line wrap to a sane value (was ... Re: Is there any gmane.org user in the list?)

2012-11-29 Thread Jim Graham
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 08:42:16AM +, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: [ Erik Christiansen Wrote On Thu 29.Nov'12 at 5:26:49 GMT ] It can be worse than just evidencing irritation at inconsiderately formatted posts, fullquoting, top posting, lack of proper sentence structure, html, or other

Re: Please set your line wrap to a sane value (was ... Re: Is there any gmane.org user in the list?)

2012-11-29 Thread Jim Graham
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:27:13AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote: * Jim Graham spooky1...@gmail.com [11-29-12 11:16]: Perhaps the same as for a hotmail/yahoo/ms/aol/... address. Years past Well yeah, I remember those...never used them because I knew they were useless from day one (except

Re: Please set your line wrap to a sane value (was ... Re: Is there any gmane.org user in the list?)

2012-11-24 Thread Jim Graham
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 09:27:49PM -0500, Peter Davis wrote: I don't think there's any question in typography circles or in usability circles that proportional fonts are more readable than fixed width fonts. On this, I agree 100%. But when did we switch from e-mail to typography? I use TeX

Re: readability of variable width fonts (was Re: Please set your line wrap to a sane value)

2012-11-24 Thread Jim Graham
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 09:16:22AM +, Tony's unattended mail wrote: On 2012-11-23, Jim Graham spooky1...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 09:47:46PM +, Tony's unattended mail wrote: BTW, sending a variable width format allows for 72 character rendering, so these dated

Re: Please set your line wrap to a sane value (was ... Re: Is there any gmane.org user in the list?)

2012-11-24 Thread Jim Graham
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 11:01:16AM -0500, Peter Davis wrote: Excuse me if I've misinterpreted your question again You have. Oh well. Later, --jim -- THE SCORE: ME: 2 CANCER: 0 73 DE N5IAL (/4)MiSTie #49997 Running Mac OS X Lion spooky1...@gmail.com

Re: Please set your line wrap to a sane value (was ... Re: Is there any gmane.org user in the list?)

2012-11-24 Thread Jim Graham
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 09:58:03AM -0600, Derek Martin wrote: Stop right there... reread what he said. We're not talking about variable width *fonts* -- we're talking about variable width *formats*, like flowed formatting. Yes, I read that in a previous post. That will happen sometimes.

Re: Please set your line wrap to a sane value (was ... Re: Is there any gmane.org user in the list?)

2012-11-24 Thread Jim Graham
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 11:49:26AM -0600, Derek Martin wrote: I repeat what I said in an earlier message in this thread. HTML is best for handling this. But the matter is not that simple, and for those of us who love Mutt, it's currently not (pratically speaking) an option at all, for

Re: email has changed, you won't change everyone, and you don't have to

2012-11-23 Thread Jim Graham
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 03:43:21AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 01:21:18PM -0600, Jim Graham wrote: Interesting, considering that Unix doesn't use CR/LF ... it uses a single newline instead. So I suppose that means that the entire e-mail, from the From line

Re: Please set your line wrap to a sane value (was ... Re: Is there any gmane.org user in the list?)

2012-11-23 Thread Jim Graham
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 09:47:46PM +, Tony's unattended mail wrote: BTW, sending a variable width format allows for 72 character rendering, so these dated ergonomics studies are not at odds with an unwrapped source text anyway. Two questions about variable width fonts, then First,

Re: Please set your line wrap to a sane value (was ... Re: Is there any gmane.org user in the list?)

2012-11-23 Thread Jim Graham
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 01:45:42AM +0100, Andre Kl?rner wrote: On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 05:04:38PM -0600, Jim Graham wrote: Two questions about variable width fonts, then First, how does Mutt do with variable width fonts? I gather that it does handle them, but how? My version

Re: email has changed, you won't change everyone, and you don't have to

2012-11-21 Thread Jim Graham
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:09:17AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote: Because there are no CR/LF in a paragraph then it is treated all as one line. Interesting, considering that Unix doesn't use CR/LF ... it uses a single newline instead. So I suppose that means that the entire e-mail, from the

Re: Please set your line wrap to a sane value (was ... Re: Is there any gmane.org user in the list?)

2012-11-21 Thread Jim Graham
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 05:02:50PM +, Tony's unattended mail wrote: LF means begin next line now. So as an author posting text to a forum, at what point do you need an LF? Not after XX width, because that makes poor assumptions about the readers medium (is it an LCD, or a phone?). So

Re: Putting table in email?

2012-11-21 Thread Jim Graham
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 07:03:07AM +, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: I, like David do prefer vi over vim not that it's especially relevent, so this is great. Being set-up immediately here :-) thanks guys I'm going to post this one (two-part) comment on preferred editors.. The right/best

Re: Putting table in email?

2012-11-20 Thread Jim Graham
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 09:02:11PM +, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: +--+--+-+--+ |Year | Hurricane | Deaths | Location | |1780 | Great Hurricane of 1780| 27,500+ |

Re: email has changed, you won't change everyone, and you don't have to

2012-11-20 Thread Jim Graham
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 05:51:40PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote: Top posting almost invariably requires me to re-read WAY more of the previous thread than I would have had to if the user posted in line and trimmed quoted text appropriately. And on top of that, you have to read, in chunks,

Re: Please set your line wrap to a sane value (was ... Re: Is there any gmane.org user in the list?)

2012-11-20 Thread Jim Graham
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 02:57:00PM -0800, Jeremy Kitchen wrote: I really can't believe I'm about to say this, but: HTML solves this problem entirely. There, I said it. If you keep track, you'll probably find, as I have, that HTML-only e-mail is between 99% to 100% spam. I send those to

Re: select wrapped lines / click long url / bug 3453

2012-10-26 Thread Jim Graham
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 06:09:03AM +0300, Alex Efros wrote: Mutt variable: set markers It enabled, will show + sign at beginning of each wrapped line (using different color, to make clear that + is mutt's special thing, not part of email text). THANKS! That little '+' has been annoying the

Re: Android MUA does not display mail correctly because of Content-Disposition in header

2012-09-27 Thread Jim Graham
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:07:51PM -0500, Luis Mochan wrote: On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:06:00PM +0200, Ambrevar wrote: I don't recall any problem reading with Android 2.1 mail sent by mutt. I use K-9 as my Android mail client in my phone. Best regards, My fellows recently let me aware of

Re: Old e-mail markup language RFC ?

2012-09-19 Thread Jim Graham
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 03:54:48PM +1000, m...@raf.org wrote: at least my Mutt 1.5.21 (2010-09-15) on my ubuntu-11.04 system at home can render it but my Mutt 1.5.20 (2009-06-14) on a debian-6.0 system doesn't render it at all. that's odd. they have the same compile options but different

Re: Old e-mail markup language RFC ?

2012-09-19 Thread Jim Graham
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:02:49PM +1000, m...@raf.org wrote: > Jim Graham wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 03:54:48PM +1000, m...@raf.org wrote: > > > check the email headers. i tried the above and the resulting email > still had the usual Content-Type: text/plain;

Re: Old e-mail markup language RFC ?

2012-09-19 Thread Jim Graham
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 08:12:25AM -0500, Jim Graham wrote: Ok, I just did that. Now let's see if this is bold or if this is underlined. One thing I don't remember is how to specify colors I also forgot that the usual line breaks go awayand how to make line breaks. What a mess

Old e-mail markup language RFC ?

2012-09-18 Thread Jim Graham
I'm not sure of the exact year, but somewhere around 1996--1997, I was using an e-mail markup language that was similar in some respects to html, but it wasn't html. It was limited to simple text markup such as bold, simple colors, *maybe* italic and underline (don't remember), and if I remeember

Re: Old e-mail markup language RFC ?

2012-09-18 Thread Jim Graham
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:32:59PM +1000, m...@raf.org wrote: m...@raf.org wrote: Jim Graham wrote: I'm not sure of the exact year, but somewhere around 1996--1997, I was using an e-mail markup language that was similar in some respects to html, but it wasn't html. It was limited

Re: Thank you for Mutt

2012-07-25 Thread Jim Graham
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 06:29:33PM +0100, Joe McCool wrote: On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 6:19 PM, stargr...@stargrave.org wrote: Thanks to all the Mutt developers, contributors, and user community. Mutt is a great app! It doesn't suck at all. Joining in! Really, Mutt is absolutely the

Re: Thank you for Mutt

2012-07-25 Thread Jim Graham
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 04:17:59AM -0500, Jim Graham wrote: As will I. :-) Forgot one thing: I've been using Mutt since right around the time it went from alpha to beta status, ca 1995, I think, and have never had even the slightest regret. It has, simply, always been the best for me

Re: Thank you for Mutt

2012-07-25 Thread Jim Graham
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 01:00:28AM +0200, Andre Kl?rner wrote: Well, what do you mean with that? I also noticed that sometimes the fullscreen running mutt looks a bit unusual when you use 80 of your 250 columns. But how would you think could one make it better? I'm not sure what you're

Re: Thank you for Mutt

2012-07-25 Thread Jim Graham
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:11:03AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: On 24Jul2012 15:20, Aaron Toponce aaron.topo...@gmail.com wrote: | - No ability to change signatures when changing accounts automatically. Well, mutt doesn't have accounts. It has individual settings for a bunch of things,

Re: Killfiling, anyone?

2012-07-25 Thread Jim Graham
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 08:48:08AM +, John Long wrote: Guys, what are you using for killfiling/mail filtering? procmail. There's no substitute, IMHO. Later, --jim -- THE SCORE: ME: 2 CANCER: 0 73 DE N5IAL (/4) | Peter da Silva: No, try rm -rf / spooky1...@gmail.com

Re: Anyone using Mutt on a Mac?

2012-05-13 Thread Jim Graham
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 03:26:15PM +0400, Alexander Gattin wrote: Hello, I use msmtp vs several email accounts (1 personal and 2 corporate). I had zero luck getting msmtp to work, but found it very easy to configure Mutt to handle it (once I got the right options to pass to configure before

Re: Anyone using Mutt on a Mac?

2012-05-13 Thread Jim Graham
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 01:15:23PM +0100, Koralatov wrote: On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 12:37, Jim Graham wrote: Especially after I tracked down a copy of the O'Reilly on sendmail :-( That's the one I had (at an old job...it was the company's copy, not mine) ... and really wish I STILL had. Sigh

Re: Anyone using Mutt on a Mac?

2012-05-13 Thread Jim Graham
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 04:18:53PM -0400, David J. Weller-Fahy wrote: * Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au [2012-05-12 20:26 -0400]: Wow...I never thought my little question would generate all of this! Lots of great (even if off-topic for the list) info. Thanks. I use the mutt from MacPorts

Re: Anyone using Mutt on a Mac?

2012-05-13 Thread Jim Graham
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 09:48:49AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: On 13May2012 03:32, Indulekha indule...@theunworthy.com wrote: | On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 09:04:00PM -0500, Jim Graham wrote: | Ok... Why does mutt-users not show up as a list with your posts, | and works for all others? I've

Re: Anyone using Mutt on a Mac?

2012-05-13 Thread Jim Graham
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 09:53:57AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: On 13May2012 16:18, David J. Weller-Fahy dave-lists-mutt-us...@weller-fahy.com wrote: We should point out to Jim that these are all independent. He can install the lot, and pick and choose. Personally I recommend he does. One

Re: Anyone using Mutt on a Mac?

2012-05-13 Thread Jim Graham
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:13:38AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: eg you've been offline for a week and need to suck down thousands of messages). My FreeBSD system only gets shut down when the power goes out AND doesn't come back up before I get to the console and type shutdown -h now. Later,

Anyone using Mutt on a Mac?

2012-05-12 Thread Jim Graham
I'm going to be replacing my old, rapidly dying systems with a Mac next month, and am wondering if anyone here has used Mutt on Mac OS X (Lion). I'm curious about how that's working out, etc. (I've never actually SEEN Mac OS X, so I don't know how much of the Unix base is still there). Thanks,

Re: Anyone using Mutt on a Mac?

2012-05-12 Thread Jim Graham
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 07:03:29PM -0500, Indulekha wrote: On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 06:51:52PM -0500, Jim Graham wrote: I'm curious about how that's working out, etc. I used to, a few years ago. Good guide here: http://linsec.ca/opensearch_desc.php

Re: Anyone using Mutt on a Mac?

2012-05-12 Thread Jim Graham
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 12:22:49AM +0100, Koralatov wrote: As for OS X's Unix base: I'm not at all experienced, or even particularly knowledgeable, about Unix, but it appears pretty intact to me. The biggest difference I've discovered from other *nixen is that it's deprecated cron in

Re: Anyone using Mutt on a Mac?

2012-05-12 Thread Jim Graham
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 10:23:53AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: I use the mutt from MacPorts (WELL worth installing - very easy and gives you access to a HUGE suite of common UNIX tools). If you install MacPorts it is important to use mutt-devel instead of mutt as the package name; the

Re: Anyone using Mutt on a Mac?

2012-05-12 Thread Jim Graham
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 07:34:29PM -0500, Jim Graham wrote: I'm also going to have to (hopefully) remember the set of options I set to use Gmail to SEND mail, and fetchmail to get mail, and procmail as my MDA/mail filter. sendmail---it's been a LONG time since configuring sendmail Ummm

Re: Anyone using Mutt on a Mac?

2012-05-12 Thread Jim Graham
Just a quick comment on a .sig On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 10:23:53AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: Mac OS X. Because making Unix user-friendly is easier than debugging Windows. 1) Unix is user-friendly. It's just finicky about who its friends are. 2) Unix is by far the most user-friendly OS

Re: Anyone using Mutt on a Mac?

2012-05-12 Thread Jim Graham
Ok... Why does mutt-users not show up as a list with your posts, and works for all others? I've never seen this happen before with Mutt and lists. On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:39:00AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: On 12May2012 19:39, Jim Graham spooky1...@gmail.com wrote: Simple enough

Re: Anyone using Mutt on a Mac?

2012-05-12 Thread Jim Graham
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:01:03PM -0400, Ravi Pina wrote: That and I haven't figured out how to save custom words to a aspell dictionary. I also haven't spent much time on it either after it wasn't immediately obvious how to do it. I'd offer to help, but I use ispell (when I remember

Re: Anyone using Mutt on a Mac?

2012-05-12 Thread Jim Graham
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 12:40:27PM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: and I miss my infinite desktops setup I use under FVWM). I do turn off the when switching to an app, switch to a desktop with its window setting in the spaces prefs. Ok, here's a question for you: can I use ctwm for my window

Re: List-Reply vs. Reply

2012-01-14 Thread Jim Graham
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 02:34:55PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote: R and L seem to function the same for lists where I am subscribed. The only way w/o directly entering the addressee to Reply to the individual is to use Group and delete the cc: address. What has changed recently that would

Re: add Bcc for lists but not regular e-mail?

2011-10-22 Thread Jim Graham
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:14:20AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote: * Jim Graham spooky1...@gmail.com [10-21-11 09:02]: I'm on several e-mail lists, and none of them send me copies of my own e-mail (nor do they offer that option). iianm, it is gmail that is not providing you with copies Ok

Re: add Bcc for lists but not regular e-mail? (fwd)

2011-10-22 Thread Jim Graham
Oops...accidentally did a 'r'eplay, not 'L'ist reply - Forwarded message from Jim Graham spooky1...@gmail.com - Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 08:14:25 -0500 From: Jim Graham spooky1...@gmail.com To: Michael Graham mich...@skky.org Subject: Re: add Bcc for lists but not regular e-mail

Re: add Bcc for lists but not regular e-mail? (fwd)

2011-10-22 Thread Jim Graham
I did it again...regular reply instead of a list reply My chemobrain (brain nuked by two types of chemotherapy, both very hard on the brain, plus tumors, plus three brain surgeries, plus max-dose radiation ... I do at least have an excuse!) On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 02:30:13PM +0100,

Re: add Bcc for lists but not regular e-mail? (fwd)

2011-10-22 Thread Jim Graham
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 02:30:13PM +0100, Michael Graham wrote: Perhaps something like this may work for you: send-hook @mutt.org pushedit-bcckill-liney...@address.comEnter No Bcc. It didn't work.:-( Later, --jim -- THE SCORE: ME: 2 CANCER: 0 73 DE N5IAL (/4)| DMR: So

Re: add Bcc for lists but not regular e-mail? (fwd)

2011-10-22 Thread Jim Graham
Interesting... List reply doesn't work if the list is CCd, and not in the From: field. I never noticed that before. On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 11:35:41AM -0500, David Champion wrote: I haven't tried this and it's only off the cuff, but perhaps a send2-hook setting $sendmail would work: I

add Bcc for lists but not regular e-mail?

2011-10-21 Thread Jim Graham
I'm on several e-mail lists, and none of them send me copies of my own e-mail (nor do they offer that option). The strange thing is, this only started to happen when I upgraded to 1.5.21 and set p proper authentication with gmail's SMTP server (I use fetchmail and procmail for incoming from the

any possibility of Mutt (or Mutt-like) for Android?

2011-10-21 Thread Jim Graham
As the subject line says...is there ay possibility of either a direct port of Mutt, or at least something similar, for the Android? I'm not sure if this qualifies as an absurd question or not (I'm thinking it probably is, but I've been surprised enough times now with Android apps that mimic

Re: any possibility of Mutt (or Mutt-like) for Android?

2011-10-21 Thread Jim Graham
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 06:11:31AM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote: On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 06:05:56AM -0700, Jim Graham wrote: Man, that sounds pretty painful. mutt is so keyboard dependent and unless you had a physical keyboard on your Android device, the mutt folks would have to do a lot

configuring/compiling Mutt 1.5.21 with SASL

2011-07-04 Thread Jim Graham
I've been trying to get Mutt 1.5.21 working directly with Gmail (only for outgoing e-mail---I already have fetchmail working nicely via cron for incoming e-mail), and am down to what I believe is the last step: getting SASL into the build. There's just one problem Based on what I've read on

[HOWTO] compiling Mutt for Windows NT

2000-04-07 Thread Jim Graham
Ok, ok I can already hear the heckling starting, and this e-mail hasn't even left my system yet :-) But for those of us who have to use a windoze box at work, this might be useful information, so it's time to de-lurk and post what I've gotten done so far. This is a preliminary look

Re: filters

1999-06-07 Thread Jim Graham
On Sat, Jun 05, 1999 at 09:21:39PM -0500, phuzz phactor wrote: would someone be kind enough to explain how I use filters with mutt? i'm trying to sort my mail into different folders based on different You use filters (and from reading your previous post, I gather you mean procmail, and that

Re: filters

1999-06-07 Thread Jim Graham
On Mon, Jun 07, 1999 at 08:03:38AM -0500, Jim Graham wrote: Now, as to how you use filters, lots of others have provided links to the procmail web page(s), etc., I just took a closer look at the responses I mentioned above, and I'm correcting one error myself: make that ftp sites, not web

Re: Using mutt with news?

1999-05-27 Thread Jim Graham
On Thu, May 27, 1999 at 01:01:52AM -0700, Kim DeVaughn wrote: On Wed, May 26, 1999, Brandon Long ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: | | some people like slrn, though I could never get past the single | pager/index thing. Others like tin. Personally, if I'm not using | mutt+nntp, I use nn. And

Re: MS attachments

1999-05-03 Thread Jim Graham
On Sun, May 02, 1999 at 09:58:57PM +0200, Roland Rosenfeld wrote: On Sun, 02 May 1999, David Resnick wrote: I recieve mail from MS-Outlook clients with attachments that I cannot access. Mutt displays these attachments in the body of the email, like this: [non-standard uuencoded

how do I *NOT* include myself in group-reply?

1999-04-15 Thread Jim Graham
When I do a group-reply from Mutt, it seems that roughly half of the time, I end up being CC'd in that reply. I'm already saving a copy of outbound e-mail, so this is (IMHO) a complete waste. Is there a way to turn that off that I missed while RTFMing...actually, I guess that should be RingTFM,

Re: how do I *NOT* include myself in group-reply?

1999-04-15 Thread Jim Graham
On Thu, Apr 15, 1999 at 02:14:55PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote: Jim Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I do a group-reply from Mutt, it seems that roughly half of the time, I end up being CC'd in that reply. Mutt removes your name from the list of respondents if it can determine

Re: Forging headers

1999-02-03 Thread Jim Graham
On Tue, Feb 02, 1999 at 12:27:07PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote: The name you're looking for is "envelope separator", I believe. :) [] The information stored there comes from the "envelope" of the message. The From: header is a cosmetic header stored in your message, but the

Re: Forging headers

1999-02-03 Thread Jim Graham
On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 10:52:38AM -0500, Stan Ryckman wrote: Jim Graham wrote: incoming via UUCP -- sendmail -- procmail -- disk At some point between the message being received via UUCP and procmail actually starting to work with it, the original envelope "From "