* Laurabelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-26 18:03]:
Just my 2p - I use procmail recipes (and a couple of scripts) to strip
HTML formatting from all legitimate email. The same scripts add a note
to the effect that HTML has been removed; if I want to exchange email
with that person again, I
* Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 09 30, 02 at 20:56:
* Sven Guckes said:
well, if you subscribe to a HTML-only newsletter
then you were asking for it - so it's your problem.
* Michael Leone [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-26 17:27]:
It's *not* a problem, for me, anyway.
so
* Mike Leone [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-26 03:35]:
Actually, I've gotten many non-HTML spams, too.
And I get many valid HTML mail, both
newsletters and private correspondence.
has the thought ever struck you that it might be *you*?
Since I know many different people that both send
Sven Guckes said:
* Mike Leone [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-26 03:35]:
Actually, I've gotten many non-HTML spams, too.
And I get many valid HTML mail, both
newsletters and private correspondence.
has the thought ever struck you that it might be *you*?
Since I know many different
On Sep 26 2002, Sven Guckes shared a puddle of experience:
snip about html email
Just my 2p - I use procmail recipes (and a couple of scripts) to strip
HTML formatting from all legitimate email. The same scripts add a note
to the effect that HTML has been removed; if I want to exchange email
On Sep 25 2002, Erik Christiansen shared a puddle of experience:
snip
(Of the 2247 advertising spams I've received since February, 1899
were html.)
Am I the only one who read that as February 1899 and thought what,
they had the internet back *then*?
Laurabelle
--
ASCII silly question, get
Laurabelle said:
On Sep 25 2002, Erik Christiansen shared a puddle of experience:
snip
(Of the 2247 advertising spams I've received since February, 1899
were html.)
Am I the only one who read that as February 1899 and thought what,
they had the internet back *then*?
Yes, but only
* On Sep 25 2002, Erik Christiansen..:
Of the 2247 advertising spams I've received
since February, 1899 were html.
* Laurabelle said:
Am I the only one who read that as February 1899 and
thought what, they had the internet back *then*?
* Michael Leone [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-25 18:37]:
* Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 09 25, 02 at 21:26:
* On Sep 25 2002, Erik Christiansen..:
Of the 2247 advertising spams I've received
since February, 1899 were html.
* Laurabelle said:
Am I the only one who read that as February 1899 and
thought what, they had the
I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
mails that happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip
the tags faster?
--
Eric Smith
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002, Eric Smith wrote:
I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
mails that happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip
the tags faster?
Telling people not to send email as
Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
mails that happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip
the tags faster?
Deleting HTML mail unread. It's /much/
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Eric Smith wrote:
I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
mails that happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip
the tags faster?
someone commented on lynx -dump
* Eric old fruit Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-24 13:44]:
I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait for
`lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html mails that
happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip the tags faster?
well - do not let
* Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020924 15:36]:
I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
mails that happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip
the tags faster?
Procmail
:0
*Content-type:
* Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] [09-24-02 08:54]:
I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
mails that happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip
the tags faster?
I use:
text/html; w3m -F
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 03:36:49PM +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
I have the following line in my .mailcap
text/html; unhtml ; copiousoutput
I think the unhtml website is at
http://www.econym.demon.co.uk/unhtml/
Then I view the mail as an attachment, and unhtml strips out the
tags. Seems
bill luecke said:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 03:36:49PM +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
I have the following line in my .mailcap
text/html; unhtml ; copiousoutput
good answer - apt-get install unhtml on debian
But it is still almost a second delay.
I think i will try and kill this problem with
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Eric Smith wrote:
bill luecke said:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 03:36:49PM +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
I have the following line in my .mailcap
text/html; unhtml ; copiousoutput
good answer - apt-get install unhtml on debian
But it is still almost a second delay.
I
Hello.
On Tue 2002-09-24 at 15:36:49 +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
mails that happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip
the tags faster?
Be sure to use
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Benjamin Pflugmann wrote:
Hello.
On Tue 2002-09-24 at 15:36:49 +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
mails that happen upon my inbox - what are
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 03:36:49PM +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
mails that happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip
the tags faster?
let procmail kill
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 07:51:13AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait
for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html
mails that happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing
23 matches
Mail list logo