Hello,
When I tried to compile net-snmp 5.4.2.1 with Visual Studio 2005 this
resulted in several compiler warnings and one compiler error. Can
someone please review the patch below and either apply or reject it ?
Thanks,
Bart.
Hello,
When I tried to compile net-snmp 5.4.2.1 with Visual Studio 2005 this
resulted in several compiler warnings and one compiler error. Can
someone please review the patch below and either apply or reject it ?
Thanks,
Bart.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Thomas Anders
thomas.and...@blue-cable.de wrote:
Bart Van Assche wrote:
When I tried to compile net-snmp 5.4.2.1 with Visual Studio 2005 this
resulted in several compiler warnings and one compiler error. Can
someone please review the patch below and either
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:41 AM, R. Diez rdiezmail-nets...@yahoo.de wrote:
I find the the suggested leak-debugging procedure cumbersome and error-prone.
It would be
nice if all malloc'ed memory were free'd on shutdown. I guess that would be
inside
snmp_shutdown(), or maybe I'm just missing
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Thomas Anders
thomas.and...@blue-cable.de wrote:
Bart Van Assche wrote:
When I tried to compile net-snmp 5.4.2.1 with Visual Studio 2005 this
resulted in several compiler warnings and one compiler error. Can
someone please review the patch below and either
Hello,
Is there anyone who got NOTIFICATION-LOG-MIB support in snmptrapd
working on Win32 ? Even after having fixed a few compile time and
run-time errors, a MIB walk on OID 1.3.6.1.2.1.92 (notificationLogMIB)
still returns zero varbinds. Any advice is welcome.
The patch below fixes the
Hello,
As known the source code of the Net-SNMP agent and the binaries of a
Win32 Net-SNMP installer can be downloaded from
http://www.net-snmp.org/download.html. As long as my patches are not
integrated in the official Net-SNMP distribution, I will have to
maintain an installer for a customized
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Bart Van Assche
bart.vanass...@gmail.com wrote:
As known the source code of the Net-SNMP agent and the binaries of a
Win32 Net-SNMP installer can be downloaded from
http://www.net-snmp.org/download.html. As long as my patches are not
integrated in the official
Hello,
Apparently the patch with ID 1627049
(http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1627049group_id=12694atid=312694)
has been applied on the 5.5pre branch. Please revert this patch --
this patch not only causes portability problems but IMHO it's the
wrong way to fix the observed
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Dave Shield d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk wrote:
2009/4/21 Bart Van Assche bart.vanass...@gmail.com:
d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk wrote:
OK - I've reverted that patch, and applied a simpler one to deal
with the immediate problem. (i.e. skip any fd's that are too
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 1:20 PM, sanjaykumar
sanjay.ku...@globaledgesoft.com wrote:
I am facing following following crash problem .Segmentation fault (core
dumped)
following is the trace file
Please suggest me , what could be the reason for this
You should first analyze your program
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Steve Friedl st...@unixwiz.net wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:51:45AM -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 21:11:09 -0400, Alex Burger
ale...@users.sourceforge.net said:
AB 4) I don't think we need to support Windows NT anymore and we certainly
2009/5/11 Tewen Hsieh tewen.hs...@itas.com.tw:
But there is still a question in my scenario.
That is I still can see three snmpd processes when I use ps command to
get process status.
This is so amazing that I am sure that I just create one thread.
There should be only two snmpd processes
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Tewen Hsieh tewen.hs...@itas.com.tw wrote:
Additionally, I don't know what you mean by the so-called manager thread.
Could you explain more clearly what the so-called manager thread mean?
See also the LinuxThreads FAQ, topic D.5
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Dave Shield
d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk wrote:
2009/5/28 Bart Van Assche bart.vanass...@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 5:28 PM, James R. Leu j...@inoc.com wrote:
We have been seeing a memory leak with snmpd in our
environment since the days of net-snmp 5.3
2009/6/29 liusd_sheldon liusd_shel...@126.com:
I am porting net-snmp 5.4.1 to my embedded PPC platform. The operating
system is montavista Linux 3.1. The make make install works properly. But
when I run snmpd on target board, the error appears:
r...@10.144.64.99:/usr/local/net-snmp/sbin#
Hello,
When I run aclocal -I m4 libtoolize --copy autoconf autoheader on
the Net-SNMP trunk I get the following warnings (autoconf version 2.63 / for
the autogen.sh script, see also
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2827646group_id=12694atid=312694
):
$ uname
Linux
$ svn info .
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 4:06 PM,
krome...@hotmail.comkrome...@hotmail.com wrote:
I have an application using net-snmp 5.4.2.1 which after some time -
seemingly proportional to the number of snmp requests - will terminate
with a glibc double free error. The application is doing repetitive and
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 12:02 PM,
krome...@hotmail.comkrome...@hotmail.com wrote:
The 1 remaining valgrind error (reproduced at the end in full) is
complaining about
socketcall.sendmsg(msg.msg_control) points to uninitialised byte(s).
Try to insert the statements memset(cmsg, 0, sizeof(cmsg));
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Bart Van Asschebart.vanass...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 12:02 PM,
Any opinions of whether this error could be causing my glibc double free
errors, or whether it is a red-herring?
It is unlikely that the above message printed by Valgrind is related
Hello,
Recently some dubious code for converting a 64-bit integer to a struct
counter64 has been added to agent/mibgroup/ucd-snmp/pass.c (trunk r17731).
The following statement occurs several times: *((uint64_t *) c64) = v64.
This statement copies a 64-bit integer to a struct counter64. Because
Hello,
Recently I came across the implementation of the restart_doit() signal
handler (see also the source file /agent/mibgroup/util_funcs.c). IMHO
it should be documented why this function works: all functions called
by signal handlers must be async-signal safe. It is not clear to me
whether all
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:16 AM,
krome...@hotmail.comkrome...@hotmail.com wrote:
Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 12:02 PM,
Any opinions of whether this error could be causing my glibc double free
errors, or whether it is a red-herring?
It is unlikely that the above
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Gang Shugxs...@case.edu wrote:
I am a Ph.D student in the Software Engineering Research Group in Case
Western Reserve University, under the instruction of Prof. Andy Podgurski.
In our recent research we analyzed some of your fixed bugs in your issued
data base
Hello,
The first two non-comment lines in the source file agent/mib_modules.c
are as follows:
#include net-snmp/agent/mib_module_config.h
#include net-snmp/net-snmp-config.h
And the file win32/net-snmp/net-snmp-config.h.in contains the following line:
#define USING_DISMAN_EVENT_MIB_MODULE 1
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Manu Mehta manu.me...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using net-snmp 5.4 and in agentX framework with 1 Master and 5
subagents. Subagents report there capabilities periodically(every 5
seconds) using AgentX AddAgentCaps PDU.
I have an automated test suite which runs
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Manu Mehta manu.me...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your reply Bart.
I think the patch that you are suggesting should have mattered if
there was a monitor entry in my snmpd.conf, but that is not the case
?
I had a closer look at the backtrace you posted, and
2009/12/10 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso jord...@gmail.com
Forgive me if my question isn't entirely coherent because I am not
fully understanding what I'm asking.
Right now I have in my snmpd.conf a bunch of extend commands of the form
extend $oid $name $command --args $oid
where $command
2009/12/14 Thomas Marcks von Würtemberg
thomas.marcks.von.wurtemb...@ericsson.com
I started to look at running netsnmp on my dell servers, but I did not find
any mib2c for the dell mib. I'm now looking at writing my own mib2c for the
dell servers.
The questions that i have is:
*Is ther
2009/12/14 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso jord...@gmail.com
2009/12/14 Bart Van Assche bart.vanass...@gmail.com:
2009/12/10 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso jord...@gmail.com
Right now I have in my snmpd.conf a bunch of extend commands of the form
extend $oid $name $command --args $oid
where
2009/12/15 Thomas Marcks von Würtemberg
thomas.marcks.von.wurtemb...@ericsson.com
As i understand it, openmanager is a large administration suite (correct me
if am wrong). I have a large amount of servers running various linux/unix
OS, and would like to monitor the thermal, fan and
2009/12/14 Thomas Marcks von Würtemberg
thomas.marcks.von.wurtemb...@ericsson.com
I started to look at running netsnmp on my dell servers, but I did not find
any mib2c for the dell mib. I'm now looking at writing my own mib2c for the
dell servers.
The questions that i have is:
*Is ther
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Thomas Anders
thomas.and...@blue-cable.de wrote:
bvass...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Revision: 17913
http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/net-snmp/?rev=17913view=rev
Author: bvassche
Date: 2009-12-17 13:05:53 + (Thu, 17 Dec 2009)
2009/12/16 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso jord...@gmail.com:
Our MIB has information about what modules are available in our
application and what information they should respond to. However, our
modules are largely independent between each other and communicate
with standard network protocols. Should
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Magnus Fromreide ma...@lysator.liu.sewrote:
On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 14:32 +0100, Thomas Anders wrote:
bvass...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Revision: 17913
http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/net-snmp/?rev=17913view=rev
Author: bvassche
Date:
Hello,
As known libnetsnmp supports time-based alarms via the functions
snmp_alarm_register(), run_alarms() and other functions. Two different ways
to trigger the function run_alarms() are supported inside libnetsnmp:
1. By making sure that the timeout argument of select() is small enough such
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Bart Van Assche
bart.vanass...@gmail.com wrote:
As known libnetsnmp supports time-based alarms via the functions
snmp_alarm_register(), run_alarms() and other functions. Two different ways
to trigger the function run_alarms() are supported inside libnetsnmp:
1
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Magnus Fromreide ma...@lysator.liu.sewrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 12:01 +, bvass...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Revision: 17926
http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/net-snmp/?rev=17926view=rev
Author: bvassche
Date: 2009-12-21 12:01:15 +
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 5:48 PM, nathan nitha_2...@yahoo.com wrote:
You can use some OID to send the
meaningful information, and everytime
you do the set include those OID.
You mean I need to do a snmpget on another OID to get the meaningfull info
after I do the snmpsetif this is
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Muhammad A Muquit
muhammad.muq...@alcatel-lucent.com wrote:
I'm having issues with sending traps using send_v2trap() from an AgentX
subagent on Solaris 9.
When the subagent sends series of traps, the subagent and master agent
both get blocked on the sendto()
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Thomas Anders
thomas.and...@blue-cable.de wrote:
r17933 introduced an additional #include net-snmp/library/types.h in
include/net-snmp/library/tools.h.
configure now throws the following #error for me:
- --- snip ---
In file included from
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Magnus Fromreide ma...@lysator.liu.se wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 12:01 +, bvass...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Revision: 17926
http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/net-snmp/?rev=17926view=rev
Author: bvassche
Date: 2009-12-21 12:01:15
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Wes Hardaker harda...@users.sourceforge.net
wrote:
[ ... ]
The important end point from all of this is I have yet to hear why this
is a bad thing?
a) read 0x656667 from the .conf file
b) pad it to 0x65666700
c) return it with a length of 3
Where is the
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:31 PM, nathan nitha_2...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
I wrote a test program to do snmpwalk on an OID periodically.
It worked fine for 4-5 hours, and then it crashed with the follwoing message:
snmpwalk: Unknown host (Too many open files).
Then I checked the agent, and
Hello Magnus,
As far as I know until now the following convention was used in the Net-SNMP
source tree:
* Character strings owned by a data structure and that have to be freed when
the data structure itself is deallocated are declared as *char **.
* Character strings not owned by a data structure
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Josef Moellers
josef.moell...@ts.fujitsu.com wrote:
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:02:44 +0100
Josef Moellers josef.moell...@ts.fujitsu.com wrote:
[ ... ]
Ugh, I would prefer that you use one of the other API's
to get information (like
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:53 AM, harda...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Revision: 18146
http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/net-snmp/?rev=18146view=rev
Author: hardaker
Date: 2010-02-10 23:52:59 + (Wed, 10 Feb 2010)
Log Message:
---
freebsd needs time.h above
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Wes Hardaker
harda...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:54:42 +0100, Bart Van Assche
bvanass...@acm.org said:
BVA I'm proposing to drop support for building the Net-SNMP source code
with
BVA Visual Studio 6.0 without Platform SDK
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Sylvain Dery sylvain-d...@hotmail.comwrote:
See below for some additions to the answers that were already provided by
Dave.
Does the development tool run on Windows 7? If not, when will Windows 7 be
supported?
As far as I know Net-SNMP runs fine on Windows
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:22 AM, harda...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Revision: 18144
http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/net-snmp/?rev=18144view=rev
Author: hardaker
Date: 2010-02-10 23:22:32 + (Wed, 10 Feb 2010)
Log Message:
---
beginning work for TLS
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Magnus Fromreide ma...@lysator.liu.sewrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 12:35 +, bvass...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Revision: 18166
http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/net-snmp/?rev=18166view=rev
Author: bvassche
Date: 2010-02-19 12:35:03 +
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 9:30 AM, tand...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Revision: 18175
http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/net-snmp/?rev=18175view=rev
Author: tanders
Date: 2010-02-21 08:30:19 + (Sun, 21 Feb 2010)
Log Message:
---
make sure that INADDR_NONE is
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Magnus Fromreide ma...@lysator.liu.sewrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 08:59 +, bvass...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Revision: 18164
Log Message:
---
Exported netsnmp_parse_args() such that the Net-SNMP applications
build again when libsnmp is
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Bart Van Assche bvanass...@acm.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Magnus Fromreide ma...@lysator.liu.sewrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 08:59 +, bvass...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Revision: 18164
Log Message:
---
Exported
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Magnus Fromreide ma...@lysator.liu.sewrote:
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 04:04:12PM +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Bart Van Assche bvanass...@acm.org
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Magnus Fromreide
ma
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 5:39 AM, Robert Story rst...@freesnmp.com wrote:
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:41:52 +0100 Bart wrote:
BVA Do you think there is a realistic chance that these functions were
BVA used outside the Net-SNMP project ?
Hey, we're programmers. We don't deal with reality! ;-)
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Robert Story rst...@freesnmp.com wrote:
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:47:00 +0100 Bart wrote:
BVA If I do not receive any feedback, I will apply the patch below whithin
BVA a few days. This patch does not modify the behavior of the Net-SNMP
BVA agent itself (snmpd).
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Robert Story rst...@freesnmp.com wrote:
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:11:40 +0100 Bart wrote:
BVA Handling alarms via SIGALRM was already broken by r16831 (
BVA
http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/net-snmp?view=revrevision=16831
).
BVA In that revision a
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Robert Story rst...@freesnmp.com wrote:
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:59:41 +0100 Bart wrote:
[ ... ]
BVA It is not clear to me why a thread has been created to listen for
BVA RTM_NEWADDR, RTM_DELADDR and RTM_NEWPREFIX messages instead of
processing
BVA the netlink
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Thomas Anders thomas.and...@blue-cable.de
wrote:
Bart Van Assche wrote:
Have you considered adding that define in
include/net-snmp/system/solaris.h instead of snmplib/snmpIPBaseDomain.c
such that it is available in all Net-SNMP source files when compiling
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:22 AM, surya prakash prakash...@yahoo.com wrote:
We are running a multithreaded linux application (NMS). There were 48
threads running which parallely sends the SNMP request and processes the
same.
In one of the thread, there were a write to stderror from SNMP
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 3:50 PM, dt...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Revision: 18258
http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/net-snmp/?rev=18258view=rev
Author: dts12
Date: 2010-03-11 14:50:56 + (Thu, 11 Mar 2010)
Log Message:
---
CHANGES: snmpd: PATCH: 2967400:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Dave Shield d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.ukwrote:
On 11 March 2010 17:13, Bart Van Assche bvanass...@acm.org wrote:
Log Message:
---
CHANGES: snmpd: PATCH: 2967400: Retrieve error counters for the
EtherLike-MIB
Patch supplied by Josef Moellers
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Wes Hardaker
harda...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:23:09 -0500, Robert Story
rst...@freesnmp.com said:
RS Can someone remind me what the consensus is on the short form for
unsigned
RS types? There seems to be a bunch of type
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Wes Hardaker
harda...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:44:31 +0100, Bart Van Assche
bvanass...@acm.org said:
BVA It would make several Net-SNMP maintainers happy if support for
BVA MSVC 6 could be dropped.
It'd make other Net-SNMP
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Magnus Fromreide ma...@lysator.liu.sewrote:
On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 09:14 +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Wes Hardaker
harda...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:44:31 +0100, Bart Van Assche
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Dave Shield
d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.ukwrote:
I've had a quick look at the code for winExtDLL.c
(in response to bug #2971257), and there's something
that confuses (/concerns) me.
Within the var_winExtDLL handler, there's the usual
(for request = requests;
Hello,
During the latest Net-SNMP administrative meeting it has been brought up
that it is inconvenient that AgentX clients on Windows using the Net-SNMP
library have to set the AgentX target explicitly to localhost:705. The
patch below overcomes this, but at the same time changes the default
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Thomas Anders
thomas.and...@blue-cable.dewrote:
Magnus Fromreide wrote:
This patch is something I think should be applied overall as it will
affect
the default tcp host for master agents on unices as well and make it more
likely that it just works for
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Dave Shield d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.ukwrote:
On 21 March 2010 08:45, Dave Shield d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk wrote:
On 20 March 2010 15:13, Robert Story rst...@freesnmp.com wrote:
Dave, have any other issues come up that might warrant a rc2?
I've got a
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Dave Shield
d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.ukwrote:
On 22 March 2010 18:46, Bart Van Assche bvanass...@acm.org wrote:
How well have these patches been tested, and on which platforms ?
The first three were in response to queries on the mailing list.
I've tested (2
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Dave Shield d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.ukwrote:
On 23 March 2010 11:44, Bart Van Assche bvanass...@acm.org wrote:
Personally I consider the fact that the patch does not have the same
effect
on 32-bit systems as on 64-bit systems as a flaw.
There is yet
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Dave Shield d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk wrote:
Please find attached four proposed patches, which could potentially be
applied to the 5.4.x (and 5.2.x) lines. We're currently in release-freeze
for both of these branches, so could people please indicate whether
Hello,
Currently the behavior with regard to AgentX over TCP is as follows:
snmpd -x tcp: listens to *:705 (!)
agentxtrap -x tcp: connects to 0.0.0.0:705
The patch below changes the AgentX over TCP behavior into:
snmpd -x tcp: listens to localhost:705
agentxtrap -x tcp: connects to
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Dave Shield
d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk wrote:
I've had a quick look at the code for winExtDLL.c
(in response to bug #2971257), and there's something
that confuses (/concerns) me.
Within the var_winExtDLL handler, there's the usual
(for request =
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Dave Shield d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.ukwrote:
[ ... ]
In response to these comments, I've drafted a revised version
of this patch (attached), which uses the comparison code
structure that you suggest.
It also uses INT32_MAX where available (but doesn't rely
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Wes Hardaker
harda...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:32:57 +0200, Magnus Fromreide
ma...@lysator.liu.se said:
MF b) I would probably prefer the following since it makes sense to use
MF a well known name and this define is located in an
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Dave Shield d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.ukwrote:
On 31 March 2010 08:25, Bart Van Assche bvanass...@acm.org wrote:
MF #ifndef INT32_MAX
MF #define INT32_MAX 0x7fff
MF #endif
It seems like some context information got lost in this discussion
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Dave Shield d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.ukwrote:
On 31 March 2010 09:44, Bart Van Assche bvanass...@acm.org wrote:
On most 64-bit systems sizeof(int) == 4 and on some others sizeof(int) ==
8.
But what is the value of INT32_MAX on such systems?
I would expect
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Dave Shield d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.ukwrote:
On 12 April 2010 19:16, Bart Van Assche bvanass...@acm.org wrote:
As far as I know win32/build.bat on the V5.4 branch only works with
Visual Studio 6.
I'm somewhat surprised (and more than a little disappointed
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Wes Hardaker
harda...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:06:44 +0200, Bart Van Assche
bvanass...@acm.org said:
BVA I have just verified that this patch makes building with VS6 via
BVA win32/build.bat with default settings work for the 5.4
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Dave Shield d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.ukwrote:
On 14 April 2010 11:16, Bart Van Assche bvanass...@acm.org wrote:
But what I do not like is that the
patch disables the notification log MIB for all Win32 builds.
But as far as I can
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:08 AM, dt...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Revision: 18496
http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/net-snmp/?rev=18496view=rev
Author: dts12
Date: 2010-04-14 08:08:42 + (Wed, 14 Apr 2010)
Log Message:
---
CHANGES: Win32: Fix batch build
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Bart Van Assche bvanass...@acm.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:08 AM, dt...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Revision: 18496
http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/net-snmp/?rev=18496view=rev
Author: dts12
Date: 2010-04-14 08:08:42 + (Wed
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Dave Shield d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.ukwrote:
On 13 April 2010 12:47, Dave Shield d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk wrote:
(I'm looking at problems with builds with some of the other
parameters enabled...)
The attached patch seems to fix the errors running
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Dave Shield d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.ukwrote:
On 14 April 2010 17:52, Bart Van Assche bvanass...@acm.org wrote:
[ ... ]
Another note about the same revision: why did you change
/* #undef NETSNMP_USE_DLL */ into #define NETSNMP_USE_DLL 1 ?
I assume
The patch below fixes the IPv6-enabled Win32 build. What this patch does is
to hide the inet_ntop() and inet_pton() declarations from the Microsoft SDK
headers such that these do not cause conflicts with the declarations in the
Net-SNMP source tree. And even when Net-SNMP is running on a Windows
As known the notification log MIB was disabled recently on the V5.4 branch
because it triggered a build failure (
http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/net-snmp?view=revrevision=18496).
The patch below reenables the notification log MIB, but only when building
with the Windows Platform SDK
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Dave Shield d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.ukwrote:
On 20 April 2010 17:37, Bart Van Assche bvanass...@acm.org wrote:
The patch below reenables the notification log MIB, but only when
building
with the Windows Platform SDK enabled.
I've had a quick look
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Dave Shield d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.ukwrote:
On 23 April 2010 20:03, Bart Van Assche bvanass...@acm.org wrote:
Regarding the interactive build: HAVE_WIN32_PLATFORM_SDK has to be
disabled manually before starting to build with MSVC 6 on a system where
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Dave Shield d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.ukwrote:
Attached is a version of your patch that seems to work for me.
If you're happy with this (and no-one else objects), we might
as well apply it, and move on to the next issue.
The patch seems fine to me, and I have
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Magnus Fromreide ma...@lysator.liu.sewrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 03:31 +, rst...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Revision: 18623
http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/net-snmp/?rev=18623view=rev
Author: rstory
Date: 2010-04-29 03:31:29 + (Thu,
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Robert Story rst...@freesnmp.com wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:20:35 +0200 Magnus wrote:
MF NEWS: snmplib: add remove function to container iterator; implement
it for
MF binary_array
MF
MF You choose to let iterator::remove move to the previous entry. I
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Ron Bets ron.b...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi folks. I am struggling a little bit, trying to get 5.2.4.1 built under
Windows with IPv6 support enabled. My environment is something like this:
Visual Studio 6.0 sp5
ActivePerl
Microsoft SDK (Feb 2003)
I have run
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Ron Bets ron.b...@oracle.com wrote:
Thanks. The PSDK include directory does come before the VC98 include dirs.
I *think* I was successful building the libs from the IDE, but the errors
persist from the cmd line. However, when I try to build an executable,
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Ron Bets ron.b...@oracle.com wrote:
Thanks again. I had noticed that in the readme, and the project is
apparently attempting to link against the open ssl lib, but there seems to
be an additional external dependency that is not met. Here is an example of
the
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Ron Bets ron.b...@oracle.com wrote:
Thanks. I am not tied specifically to the 5.4.x stream. My main
requirement is support for IPv6 transport on Windows, Solaris, and Linux.
Would I be better off with a different release? I only selected 5.4.2.1
because the
This patch makes maintaining the Windows (MSVC) port harder because due to
this patch different mechanisms are used in the non-MSVC build and in the
MSVC-build for generating the header file
snmplib/transports/snmp_transport_inits.h. Would it be OK to revert this
patch and to add a file
Hello Jan,
This patch breaks the build on the 5.5 branch because it referes to a
non-existing macro NETSNMP_LOGONCE() .
Bart.
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 4:14 PM, jsafra...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Revision: 18714
http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/net-snmp/?rev=18714view=rev
Of *Bart Van Assche
*Sent:* Friday, May 14, 2010 4:51 PM
*To:* Duy Doan Khuong
*Cc:* net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
*Subject:* Re: different between Net-SNMP Agent service and snmpd.exe from
command line
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Duy Doan Khuong dk...@tma.com.vn
wrote:
I’m
1 - 100 of 517 matches
Mail list logo
