Hi Stephen,
the current ns-2 implementation of 802.11 can be
considered representative of all b/g/a versions of
the protocol. As a
matter of fact, only the MAC sub-
layer is considered in ns-2. PHY
support is scarce in
ns-2, and the different b/g/a versions are usually
simulated by changing cha
Hi Diego,
you may have a look at trace2stats, at http://www.reti.
polito.it/fiore
bye,
Marco
>Messaggio originale
>Da:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 13-ott-2006 10.41 PM
>A: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wmc.nl>
>Cc:
>Ogg: [ns] How to plot jitter,
throughput and end to end delay of a eurane simula
Loreno,
in common/packet-stamp.h you can find the PacketStamp
structure, which is
included in any ns packet. It stores information on
the transmitted and received
power. You can access this information
with, for example, p->txInfo_.RxPr,
which returns the received power
of packet p. Note tha
nodes.
Regards,
Marco
>Messaggio originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
com
>Data: 18-ott-2006 7.58 PM
>A: "Marco Fiore"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc:
>Ogg: Re: R: [ns] RSSI measurement
>
>Hi Marco,
very thanks to your reply!
>
>I will take a look at the
Diego,
have a look at trace2stats at http://www.reti.polito.it/fiore.
bye,
Marco
>Messaggio originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 3-nov-2006 12.22 AM
>A:
>Ogg: [ns] Plotting
throughput end-to-end delay and jitter
>
>
>Hi,
>
>Has anynone a tcl
code (or another language) to plot
Andrea,
if you want to transmit 1 Mbps every 10 mins,
simply use a
recursive function like:
proc sendData {} {
global ns_
puts "time : [$ns_ now]"
$ns at [$ns_ now] "$ftp send 1e6"
$ns_ at [expr [$ns_ now] + 600.0] "sendData"
}
$ns_ at 600.0
"sendData"
which
Hi,
have a look at trace2stats, at http://www.reti.polito.it/fiore
bye,
Marco
>Messaggio originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 15-nov-2006 10.38 AM
>A: "ns users"
>Ogg: [ns]
how to calculate end to end delay in wireless scenario
>
>
>
> hi all,
>
> can any one tell me, how to calc
Ramzi,
you can use the Tcl command
Phy/WirelessPhy set Pt_
Look in tcl/lib/ns-default.tcl for default value and
other wireless phy
parameters.
bye,
Marco
>Messaggio originale
>Da: ramzi.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 22-nov-2006 4.06 PM
>A:
>Ogg:
[ns] wimax and Wifi TxPower default va
Hi,
"Array" should be "array"...
bye,
Marco
>Messaggio
originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 26-nov-2006 5.42
PM
>A:
>Ogg: [ns] Phy/WirelessPhy set Pt_ ?
>
>
>I
am attemped to use the code line [[lindex [$node_ (0) Array get
>netif_] 1] set Pt_ 0,5] and you giving the error ?i
Elena,
if I understood your problem, you cannot run ns from any
location of
your file system. If that's right, check that the ns
executable, or a link
to it is present in any of the folders listed in
your PATH. To visualize
the list of folders in the PATH, type 'echo
$PATH'.
If you need fur
Luca,
the routing of multiple flows generated by the
same source node
is determined by:
1. destination node of flow
2. routing algorithm
employed
In your case, if the two flows are directed to two
different
nodes, they will probably choose different
(not necessarily disjoint)
routes. If the
Hi,
if you refer to rate-based congestion control, the first result
by
searching Google is:
"Source code for RAP in ns2"
http://netweb.usc.
edu/reza/RAP/NewRAP/
If you refer to rate adaptation at MAC layer in
wireless networks,
by looking at the ns mailing list archives, a patch
is available
Dear ?
it's difficult to tell without any information,
you should at
least post your tcl script and
a portion of the tracefile showing
RTS/CTS...
bye,
Marco
>Messaggio originale
>Da: ns2.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 14-dic-2006 10.40 AM
>A:
>Ogg: [ns] disable RTS/CTS mode
>
>
>dear NS
Ibrahim,
have a look at: Amit Jardosh, Elizabeth M. Belding-Royer,
Kevin C. Almeroth, and Subhash Suri. "Towards Realistic Mobility Models
for Mobile Ad hoc Networks." In the Proceedings of MOBICOM, San Diego,
CA, September 2003.
bye,
Marco
>Messaggio originale
>Da:
[EMAIL PROTEC
Hi,
ns-2 physical layer modeling is notoriously weak.
A patch solving
some of the issues you mentioned
is avaialble at http://www.reti.polito.
it/fiore
bye,
Marco
>Messaggio originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cmu.edu
>Data: 8-mar-2007 3.21 AM
>A:
>Ogg: [ns]
SINR and NS-2 802.11 simu
For the question on the jitter, you can find the formulae
in the read.
me. There's no "right" formula, I used to
employ the first, which is
defined in RTP's RFC.
I added the other three upon request of other
users,
who usually employed them for jitter calculation.
Regards,
Marco
>Messag
The output is correct. It's just some control messages
ns-2 gives at
the beginning and end of simulation.
If you see "NS EXITING..."
everything went fine and
you can find the results in your tracefile :)
bye,
Marco
>Original Message
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Mar 17, 2007 5:31 P
Hi,
I can tell you that once I tried and could send data at 1Gbps
over
wireless (just as a test) and the transmission rate was set
accordingly.
Notice that by changing that you only affect the
transmission time,
but still have all the overhead and contention due
to 802.11.
bye,
Marco
>--
Ibrahim,
download the latest version from
http://reti.polito.it/fiore
and follow the read.me for instructions on how to run the scripts.
bye,
Marco
>Messaggio originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
com
>Data: 22-mar-2007 10.19 AM
>A:
>Ogg: [ns]
problem in delay and throughput script
>
>
Hi Stephan,
have a look at tracegraph or trace2stats.
bye,
Marco
>Messaggio originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 6-apr-
2007 7.37 AM
>A:
>Ogg: [ns] analyse trace files
>
>
>Hello again!
>Think my last Mail was lost :-(
>I'm using ns-2.29 and
do some wireless simulations.
>Now i'
Hi Timo,
my guess is that those infos can be useful for
statistics
collection. Is the RTP header considered
in the UDP header size? If
not, it is an "invisible"
header, put there just for informational
purposes
and not affecting the simulation outcome.
bye,
Marco
>
Messaggio originale
Ciao,
other than nam, you can try with Huginn:
http://www.informatik.
uni-mannheim.de/pi4.data/content/projects/huginn/
or iNSpect:
http:
//toilers.mines.edu/Public/NsInspect
bye,
Marco
>Messaggio
originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 6-apr-2007 7.12 PM
>A: "ns-
users"
>Ogg: [ns]
Hi,
you can use Perl/awk to parse the tracefile,
or have a look at
tracegraph or trace2stats
(google for them).
Also, you find a ton of
mails on the topic in
the mailing list archives...
bye,
Marco
>
Messaggio originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 6-apr-2007 6.18 PM
>A:
>Ogg: [
Hi Riz,
>1. I am not sure about how to generate a scenario where all
the
>nodes are contending as in my case of 10 nodes only 0 2 4 6 8 are
>contending and the other 1 3 5 7 9 are the sink or them so how can I
>come with a scenario where all nodes are coteding as in Bianchi's
paper
attach
Anand,
there's a traffictrace agent somewhere in the ns distribution.
Look for traffictrace.cc/h in the source tree to get the actual
Tcl
class name.
Marco
>Messaggio originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 12-apr-2007 3.54 AM
>A: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Ogg: [ns] Simulation
with real
Bahman,
ususally the "Event UID not valid!" error means that an event
in the event list has a time that is lower than the current time,
or
that the handler (the timer in your case) was deleted before
the event
was extracted from the list.
So I suggest you to look for strange
behaviors of you
Hi,
it happened to me to use nam to visualize nodes movement,
and I
had no problems in doing that. These are the settings
I used:
set file
(nam) [open "out.nam" w]
$ns_ namtrace-all $file(nam)
$ns_ namtrace-all-
wireless $file(nam) $opt(x) $opt(y)
$ns_ nam-end-wireless $opt(stop)
Hope it help
et-
2007 8.53 AM
>A: "ns-users"
>Cc: "Marco Fiore"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Ogg: [ns] R: Re: About random mobility of
wireless nodes
>
>Hi,
>
> This method works and it is fine, however
in my case when I set the random mobility to 1 for the wireless
Dear Sidney and Hagen,
actually there's a way to include "real"
application-level data in an ns-2 packet.
The manual has one section on
this: http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/doc/node516.html
Basically, it's all
about defining an Application Data Unit (ADU) containing all the
desired data, to be a
You might find the following link interesting:
http://www.ece.rice.
edu/~jpr/ns/docs/ns-802_11b.html
bye,
Marco
>Messaggio
originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 11-mag-2008 10.46 AM
>A:
>Ogg: [ns] throughput of 802.11b
>
>
>Hi all,
>I
have tried to run 802.11b in ns2, and I
ow what
to do to avoid that.
Does anyone have any idea
about how to get
rid of such a problem, or any experience with
similar
issues?
Thanks,
Marco Fiore
Teena,
please provide more details when posting to the mailing list.
Information about the topology and traffic sources are needed
in order
to help you.
Regards,
Marco Fiore
Messaggio originale
Da:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Data: 5-gen-2006 6.48 AM
A:
Ogg:
[ns] Delay anomaly
Hello all
chers, but which
are not
standard and probably
not implemented in ns-2.
- use an error free
channel,
which is not realistic, but
makes TCP works a lot
better.
Regards,
Marco Fiore
Messaggio originale
Da:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Data: 15-gen-2006 3.48 PM
A:
Ogg: [ns] Tcp fo
The number of transmissions is not sufficient to determine
the cause of
such a high number of collisions. Several
other parameters are
necessary: simulation time,
transmission range of nodes, use of
RTS/CTS,
802.11 CWND min and max sizes, etc.
Regards,
Marco Fiore
Messaggio originale
Tamara,
what do you mean by "did not work"?
Did you get error
messages, or unexpected
results?
Regards,
Marco Fiore
Original
Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Jan 23, 2006 2:36 AM
To:
Subj: [ns] 802.11g - doubt in ns-2.29
Hi all!
*
I'm doing a kind of pro
Tamara,
it seems strange to me that changing only datarate and 802.11
parameters can cause
the simulation to stop. Does your code works with
standard 802.11 configuration?
Did you change anything else?
Regards,
Marco Fiore
Messaggio originale
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Data: 23-gen-2006
Michael,
it may be that increasing the data rate to 5,5 or 11 Mbps
the
number of collisions is reduced a lot. As a consequence,
the RTS/CTS
mechanism only introduces overhead.
This depend on the offered load (i.
e. how much traffic
is present) in the network.
Regards,
Marco Fiore
et_;
2. access 'target_' downtarget_ attribute. I am not sure you
can
do this directly, since 'downtarget_' is probably a protected
mamber.
Thus, you should code an accessor function (if not present)
or
define the aodv class as a friend of the 'target_' c
behave identically, having FTP/TCP
or CBR/UDP
saturating traffic should not change
things much.
Of course, things
could change in presence of
high channel error rates, which are known
to lead
to TCP low performance.
Regards,
Marco Fiore
Messaggio
originale
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Data
Sita,
have a look to the ns-manual, and you'll find all infos on
tracefiles format.
Regards,
Marco Fiore
>Messaggio originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 3-feb-2006 4.45 AM
>A: "ns list"
>Ogg: [ns] help with trace file
>
>
>Hello,
>I am
in your simulation you do not need reliability at
transport layer: in that case it is sufficient to use the UDP
protocol... you
can do that simply changing the level 4 protocol from
TCP to UDP...
Regards,
Marco Fiore
CWmax, and you can override them in your tcl script using the
same
commands.
Regards,
Marco Fiore
Dan,
which command did you use to send the message to the IP layer?
An
through which transport level protocol?
Marco Fiore
>Messaggio
originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 6-feb-2006 7.27 PM
>A:
>Ogg: [ns] IP_BROADCAST problem
>
>
>Hello,
>
>I am
I really doubt that *any* existing network simulator could be a good
one
if you need to simulate millions nodes... that's why analytical
approaches
to the p2p evaluation problem are so popular.
Regards,
Marco Fiore
>Messaggio originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 9-
Application Data Units (ADUs) containing real data can be used in ns-2.
You can look for the "AppData" class structure and functioning in the
ns-maunal (see chapter 37 'eb cache as an application' for an example).
Regards,
Marco Fiore
>Messaggio originale
>Da
ength greater than dot11RTSThreshold
fails for that MSDU or MMPDU. This long retry count and
the STA long
retry count shall be reset when a MAC frame of length greater than
dot11RTSThreshold succeeds
for that MSDU or MMPDU."
Regards,
Marco
Fiore
>Messaggio originale
>Da:
Comments are inline.
Regards,
Marco Fiore
>Messaggio
originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 3-mar-2006 2.52 AM
>A:
>Ogg: [ns] propagation model
>
>
>All,
>
>Is it
possible to support multiple propagation model?
as far as I know, no.
> is this
That error message is generated by 802.11.
See mac/mac-802_11.cc for
details.
Regards,
Marco Fiore
>Messaggio originale
>Da:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 4-mar-2006 6.23 AM
>A:
>Ogg: [ns] "Check_pktCTRL: Invalid MAC Control subtype".
>
>
>Hi,
>
Norlida,
try "./configure" instead of "configure" and after
configure&make, check
that a binary (executable) file "setdest" is
created in the folder.
Regards,
Marco Fiore
>Messaggio
originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 13-mar-2006 7.0
Krithiga,
answers are inline.
Regards,
Marco Fiore
>Messaggio
originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 12-mar-2006 1.24 PM
>A:
, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Ogg: [ns] regarding promiscuous mode
>
>
>hi all,
> i am doing proj in mobile adh
Elise,
you could have a look at the website:
http://masimum.dif.um.
es/?Documents
where Francisco Ros and other researchers
present their
work on implementing a new
routing protocol for ad-hoc networks.
Regards,
Marco Fiore
>Messaggio originale
>Da:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Dat
particular lines. Many references/tutorials/examples
of both
languages are available on the web.
Regards,
Marco Fiore
>
Original Message
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Mar 31, 2006
12:52 PM
>To: "ns-users"
>Subj: [ns] Trace file
>
>
>Hi all,
>Is there a
is to patch the scheduler with
the following code:
http:
//netlab.caltech.edu/~weixl/technical/ns2patch/ns2patch.htm
Hope this
helps,
Marco Fiore
>Messaggio originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
com
>Data: 1-apr-2006 7.39 PM
>A:
>Ogg: [ns] why
setdest so slow?
>
>
&
, before mailing
to the list (the above links are
the first results
of a Google query...)
Regards,
Marco Fiore
>
Messaggio originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 1-apr-
2006 3.31 PM
>A:
>Ogg: [ns] looking for"
hcf" implementation
>
>
>Hello
Hi everyone,
does anybody know if and where the DataRate at which
packets
are transmitted on a wireless channel is recorded in some
header?
Thanks,
Marco Fiore
Qasim,
the error messages you get informs you that the
file
tcl/lib/noah.tcl could not be find. Check that
the path is correct and
the file exists.
Regards,
Marco Fiore
>Messaggio originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 4-apr-2006 3.27 PM
>A: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EDU&g
queue - do not remember the way, but
there is one).
However,
in my opinion, this would definitely
be unfeasible in a real network,
making
simulation somehow useless...
Regards,
Marco Fiore
>
Messaggio originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 12-apr-2006
11.10 AM
>A:
>Og
stribution (in indep-utils/cmu-scen-gen).
Regards,
Marco Fiore
>Messaggio originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 14-apr-2006 12.54 AM
>A:
>Ogg: [ns] how to
install random-waypoint model in ns-2.27
>
>
>Hello everybody
> I want
to installing random-waypoin
e two versions of you awk script,
and then you'll get the same
results.
Regards,
Marco Fiore
>Messaggio originale
>Da:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 15-apr-2006 8.06 AM
>A:
>Ogg: [ns] which trace format is more accurate?
>
>
>Hi All,
>
>I am
generating both tr
Sasan,
I see your point.
How much do differ results you got in the two
cases?
By exact same simulation you mean that you simply
changed the
trace format and nothing else (included
the machine you working on)?
Regards,
Marco Fiore
>Messaggio originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please have a look to ns manual, ns mailing list history
and relative
FAQ before posting to the mailing list itself!
This is the third or
fourth mail about trace file format
this month!
Regards,
Marco Fiore
>Messaggio originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 19-
apr-2006 9
Sasan,
don't have a clue on that.
I fear the only way is to analyze
the trace files
by hand to spot the differences. Maybe printing
the
sending times (using an awk script) can
speed up the process.
Let us
know if you can solve the problem.
Regards,
Marco Fiore
>
Messaggio o
For simple topologies/statistics, you may
give a look at trace2stats:
http://www.reti.polito.it/fiore
Regards,
Marco Fiore
>Messaggio
originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 26-apr-2006 1.25
PM
>A: "ns_users_request"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "ns_users&q
.
Regards,
Marco Fiore
>Messaggio originale
>Da:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 26-apr-2006 12.46 PM
>A: "NS USERS"
>Ogg: [ns] Which ad hoc routing protocol is used in
802.11?
>
>
>Hi All,
> Which ad hoc routing protocol is used
in 802.11? I can'
for that).
Regards,
Marco Fiore
>Messaggio
originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 25-apr-2006 6.33 PM
>A: "ns_users"
>Ogg: [ns] Adhoc Rounting Overhead
>
>
>Hello NS users,
>
>I am working on some Adhoc simulations for my
graduation project, and
Look for projects such as IMPORTANT,
BonnMotion, CanuMobiSim.
Regards,
Marco Fiore
>Messaggio originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
com
>Data: 25-apr-2006 12.23 PM
>A:
>Ogg: [ns] codes
of mobility models in adhoc.
>
>
>hi every body
>im interested in a
pr
Look for the define line commanding
the propagation delay of the
wireless
channel in mac/mac-802_11.h.
Regards,
Marco Fiore
>
Messaggio originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 5-mag-2006 9.49
AM
>A:
>Ogg: [ns] Modifying 802.11 wireless Channel
Propagation Delay
>
You can try with tracegraph (http://www.tracegraph.com) or, for simple
statistics, with trace2stats (http://www.reti.polito.it/fiore).
Regards,
Marco Fiore
>Messaggio originale
>Da: m.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 17-mag-2006 12.45 AM
>A:
>Ogg: [ns] calculate >> ji
Christian,
ns-2 does not support any of the models/protocols you
mentioned.
I think you will have to code and add to the simulator them
if you
want to use them within ns.
Regards,
Marco Fiore
>
Messaggio originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 19-mag-
2006 4.09 PM
>A
Hi,
unfortunately, ns-2 SCTP implementation
does not currently support
wireless links.
Regards,
Marco Fiore
>Messaggio originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 22-mag-2006 3.09 AM
>A:
>Ogg: [ns] WLAN and SCTP?
>
>
>Hi,
>
>I am a posgraduate
in B
links support as well.
Regards,
Marco Fiore
>
Messaggio originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 7-giu-2006
11.07 AM
>A:
>Ogg: [ns] About the multihome in SCTP!
>
>
>Hi,
>
>I want to know how to configure a SCTP node in NS2.29,the
type of address is
>hierac
Eduardo,
it could be a synchronization issue.
Try to avoid
synchronization between flows
by setting the random flag of the cbr
flows
to true: "$cbr_name set random_ 1".
Regards,
Marco Fiore
>
Messaggio originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 7-giu-2006
3.00 PM
*exact* time.
Regards,
Marco Fiore
>
Messaggio originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 8-giu-2006
5.09 AM
>A: "Marco Fiore"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Ogg: Re: R: [ns] two
equal UDP CBR flows in droptail queue get different bandwidths?
>
>That
does this f
>However this modification is not working, I see that everytime
> the
dataRate is at 54Mbps, including if I comment
>every line that define
the dataRate, including the lines
>
> tcl.evalf("Mac/802_11 set
dataRate_");
>if (strcmp(tcl.result(), "0") != 0)
>
bind_bw("dataRate_"
Hi,
assuming that "violaciĆ³n de segmento" translates into "segment
fault", this error is very often caused by a NULL pointer. I.e. look
into your code for pointers, and check that you never fall in the case
p->something, where p is NULL.
regards,
Marco Fiore
&g
Andrea,
god is only used for statistical purposes.
If you are
interested in generating nodes movement simply use the 'setdest'
command, ignoring god. E.g.
$ns_ at 10.0 "$node_(0) setdest X Y S"
where X,Y are the coords of destination and S is the speed (in m/s).
bye,
Marco
>Messaggio o
Hi,
some days ago (probably after a recompile, but I am not sure about
that),
my installation of ns-2 became 'mute' in presence of errors.
That is, previously it exited saying 'Segmentation fault', or printing
something
like (just an example!):
--
Alicia,
RTS/CTS is used when frame size is greater than the RTS
threshold.
So you should act on the RTS threshold value to set RTS/CTS
on or off.
Marco
>Messaggio originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 3-lug-2006 1.31 PM
>A:
>Ogg: [ns]
RTSThreshold in Simulations
>
>
>Hello guys:
>
AARF algorithm was designed by the Planete research
group at INRIA.
Full references and installation instructions can be
found in the included read.me
file. An example Tcl script to test the
patch is provided.
The patch is available for download at
http://www.
reti.polito.it/fiore
Regards,
Marco Fiore
Prateek,
setting the finish time to a high value should not cause any
harm, nor should it make you wait more.
Since ns-2 is an event-driven
simulator, once no event is scheduled the time shall move directly to
the
'end of simulation' event, in no (user) time.
I don't know if
other better sol
Prateek,
unfortunately, I think you are right...
Marco
>
Messaggio originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 4-lug-
2006 1.27 PM
>A:
>Cc: "Marco Fiore"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
it>
>Ogg: Re: R: [ns] Ending the simulation after a transfer is
finished
>
>
Guillermo,
ns-2 does not offer native support for such phenomenon.
You
can have a look at the patch at www.reti.polito.it/fiore
which adds
realistic propagation and ARF support.
Marco
>Messaggio
originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 11-lug-2006 11.50 AM
>A:
"Ns Users"
>Ogg: [ns]
Nicholas,
I think the right way would be:
mean = [mean * (total_pkts-
1) + curr_pkt_delay] / total_pkts
where total_pkts represents the
number of packets received, including
the current one (i.e., that
determining the curr_pkt_delay contribution).
Regards,
Marco
>
Messaggio originale--
Hi,
if you mean 802.11 DCF, it is already implemented.
See the ns
manual.
bye,
Marco
>Messaggio originale
>Da:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 22-lug-2006 5.40 PM
>A:
>Ogg: [ns] how to implement DCF in NS2
>
>
>Hi
> I want to implement
DCF in NS2, can anybody help me in this regard.
>
Hi,
look for references to the 'setdest' command, which allows you
to
define nodes movements during simulation.
Marco
>Messaggio
originale
>Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 30-ago-2006 7.02 PM
>A:
>Ogg: [ns] How to generate ocean node movement
for wireless scenarios
>
>
>Hi all,
>
Hi,
you could have a look at the wireless patch at
http://www.reti.
polito.it/fiore
regards,
Marco
>Messaggio originale
>Da:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Data: 14-set-2006 8.22 PM
>A: "Piyush
Agrawal"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc:
>Ogg: Re: [ns]
Measuring physical data rate for wireless medium
>
>
86 matches
Mail list logo