On Do, 17 Apr 2008, Will Robertson wrote:
Sorry, I didn't know how you went about actually creating this package.
The packages are created from the actual TeX Live release, or better
from the security branch of the subversion repository, the tag 2007.1 or
how it is called.
It sounds like it
On 17/04/2008, at 2:48 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
And we should at the same time update the necessary packages (is euenc
and fontspec enough?)
xltxtra has seen a couple of bug fixes too.
That one -is- in the current repository.
W
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On 17/04/2008, at 3:08 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
Honestly, I fear to open a pandora's box here.
Bleah, I can see your concern.
Sorry, I didn't know how you went about actually creating this package.
It sounds like it would be easiest to stick with the official releases
of TeXLive, despite
On 17 Apr 2008, at 1:09 am, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 1:42 AM, Jonathan Kew wrote:
On 16 Apr 2008, at 7:56 pm, Norbert Preining wrote:
Given that there won't be TL2008 in lenny, I think it would be very
desirable to update xetex to a more recent version than 0.996 as
On 17 Apr 2008, at 7:23 am, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Do, 17 Apr 2008, Will Robertson wrote:
Sorry, I didn't know how you went about actually creating this
package.
The packages are created from the actual TeX Live release, or better
from the security branch of the subversion repository,
On Do, 17 Apr 2008, Jonathan Kew wrote:
If I do this, and create a tag 2007.1 in TL with the updated
branch2007 version, are you able to use this as the base for your
Of course, that would be great. And if you want to be nice to me, too,
send me a simple diff (svn diff output) of what you did
Hi all,
On Mi, 16 Apr 2008, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Release_Note
for everything we did change and patch in the past 24 hours.
If nothing bad happens, this release will go to CTAN (and
debian, I presume) sometime tomorrow.
Preliminary packages are available
On Mi, 16 Apr 2008, Hans Hagen wrote:
indeed we need the latest although in the luatex version there is a kind
of fallback name subsystem,
Aehm what does this mean??? So either you need it, or there is a
fallback system ... semantics are sometimes dangerous ;-)
So if we ship the old
Norbert Preining wrote:
Hi all,
On Mi, 16 Apr 2008, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Release_Note
for everything we did change and patch in the past 24 hours.
If nothing bad happens, this release will go to CTAN (and
debian, I presume) sometime tomorrow.
Norbert Preining wrote:
On Mi, 16 Apr 2008, Hans Hagen wrote:
indeed we need the latest although in the luatex version there is a kind
of fallback name subsystem,
Aehm what does this mean??? So either you need it, or there is a
fallback system ... semantics are sometimes dangerous
On Mi, 16 Apr 2008, Hans Hagen wrote:
well, it may work with the old fonts (depends on how old), in
font-syn.tex you will find
Well it is the last release before the renaming of the fonts, as I said
1.01x.
etc. so older fonts are ok for context/luatex; while for xetex new fonts
are
On Mi, 16 Apr 2008, Norbert Preining wrote:
- for context/luatex: ok with old and new ones
- for context/xetex: new ones are necessary
Ok, I will think about updating the lmodern fonts, too, but renaming the
Hmm, according to Ralf updating the lmodern is a no-go because that
would need
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Mi, 16 Apr 2008, Norbert Preining wrote:
- for context/luatex: ok with old and new ones
- for context/xetex: new ones are necessary
True.
Ok, I will think about updating the lmodern fonts, too, but renaming the
Hmm,
On Mi, 16 Apr 2008, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
For XeLaTeX you indeed need to update fontspec, but if you're
reluctant to upgrade the rest of XeTeX, a fix of fontspec to support
the latest LM fonts is so minor, that it's really not worth having a
broken ConTeXt+XeTeX. fontspec might need only a few
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hans Hagen skrev:
Norbert Preining wrote:
Hi all,
On Mi, 16 Apr 2008, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Release_Note
for everything we did change and patch in the past 24 hours.
If nothing bad happens, this release will go
On 16 Apr 2008, at 7:56 pm, Norbert Preining wrote:
Jonathan, Will: It is about TeX Live 2007 in Debian/lenny. There
will be
no TL2008 in lenny. But we have recent context and recent luatex.
It is about updating the lmodern fonts, currently we have 1.01x, the
last before the otf and font
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 1:42 AM, Jonathan Kew wrote:
On 16 Apr 2008, at 7:56 pm, Norbert Preining wrote:
Given that there won't be TL2008 in lenny, I think it would be very
desirable to update xetex to a more recent version than 0.996 as shipped
with TL2007.
(I don't know much about the
On Do, 17 Apr 2008, Jonathan Kew wrote:
If you're willing to consider this, I can make and tag a branch in
our Subversion repository to give you a stable version to use (you'll
I am considering that, and (but) best would be to have a patch against
the sources in TeX Live 2007 (the bug fix
Hi Will,
On Do, 17 Apr 2008, Will Robertson wrote:
All other XeTeX+LaTeX packages are unaffected and you should use the
latest versions from the SVN repository. If you need me to upload the
Umpf, I don't like to package stuff that is in some svn repository for a
stable release, stuff that
19 matches
Mail list logo
