Re: [NTG-context] Lucida-1.901 (2023-01-21) available

On 1/25/2023 6:24 PM, Mikael Sundqvist via ntg-context wrote: On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 11:02 AM Otared Kavian via ntg-context wrote: Hi, Thanks Hraban for the information and the link to the article by Hans and Mikael about the math fonts in Lucida. I very much appreciated that article: one

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida-1.901 (2023-01-21) available

On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 11:02 AM Otared Kavian via ntg-context wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks Hraban for the information and the link to the article by Hans and > Mikael about the math fonts in Lucida. > > I very much appreciated that article: one sees how the handling of almost > impercebtile

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida-1.901 (2023-01-21) available

Hi, Thanks Hraban for the information and the link to the article by Hans and Mikael about the math fonts in Lucida. I very much appreciated that article: one sees how the handling of almost impercebtile details in ConTeXt make us to adhere to and love LuaMetaTeX… So a great thank you to Hans

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida small caps

> style={\sca}, > > What is the correct substitute for that? Do your titles wear garb? (SCA = Society for Creative Anachronism) ;D HR ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida small caps

On 2/17/2020 4:48 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: style={\sca}, \tf\smallcaps - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida small caps

On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 11:34 AM Hans Hagen wrote: > On 2/15/2020 10:02 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 9:50 PM Hans Hagen > > wrote: > > > > On 2/15/2020 4:34 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > One can

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida small caps

On 2/15/2020 10:02 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 9:50 PM Hans Hagen > wrote: On 2/15/2020 4:34 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: > Hi, > > One can easily enable small caps when using lucida, see the old mail >

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida small caps

On 2/15/2020 4:34 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: Hi, One can easily enable small caps when using lucida, see the old mail https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2018/090997.html . Could this be added to the type script file? best use \smallcaps or somethign equivalent

[NTG-context] Lucida small caps

Hi, One can easily enable small caps when using lucida, see the old mail https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2018/090997.html . Could this be added to the type script file? /Mikael ___ If your question is

[NTG-context] Lucida Type1 Fonts

I have been using TUG's Lucida Type1 fonts for a while in ConTeXt, but a recent update of the standalone version of ConTeXt is giving the following when building a document containing math: unknown math characters: μ (U+003BC) σ (U+003C3) χ (U+003C7) (n=44) Obviously, it's having a problem with

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida fonts with ConTeXt

If you have the type1 fonts How do we know? Sorry, but I'm not at all an expert font ! ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida fonts with ConTeXt

On 1/29/2014 10:23 PM, Fabrice wrote: If you have the type1 fonts How do we know? Sorry, but I'm not at all an expert font ! just buy the open type versions from tug ... less hassle and more complete Hans -

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida fonts with ConTeXt

Hi, Thank you to you for your answers. As I have to write text with math formulas, I'll probably buy them. Fabrice 2014-01-30 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl On 1/29/2014 10:23 PM, Fabrice wrote: If you have the type1 fonts How do we know? Sorry, but I'm not at all an expert font ! just buy

[NTG-context] Lucida fonts with ConTeXt

Hi, I want to use the Lucida fonts. I understand that these are commercial fonts that I must buy. What should buy and where ? In the meantime, I tried to test the following file : \setuppapersize[A4] \setuplayout [backspace=15mm, width=middle, topspace=15mm, height=middle,

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida fonts with ConTeXt

On 1/29/2014 8:04 PM, Fabrice Couvreur wrote: Hi, I want to use the Lucida fonts. I understand that these are commercial fonts that I must buy. What should buy and where? https://www.tug.org/store/lucida/opentype.html -

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida fonts with ConTeXt

On 29 jan. 2014, at 20:04, Fabrice Couvreur fabrice1.couvr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I want to use the Lucida fonts. I understand that these are commercial fonts that I must buy. What should buy and where ? Available from lucida-ad...@tug.org. Hans van der Meer

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida fonts with ConTeXt

On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Fabrice Couvreur wrote: Hi, I want to use the Lucida fonts. I understand that these are commercial fonts that I must buy. What should buy and where ? In the meantime, I tried to test the following file : \loadtypescriptfile[lucida-typeone]

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida fonts with ConTeXt

If you have the type1 fonts How do we know ? Sorry, but I'm not at all an expert font ! 2014-01-29 Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Fabrice Couvreur wrote: Hi, I want to use the Lucida fonts. I understand that these are commercial fonts that I must buy. What should

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida fonts with ConTeXt

Am 29.01.2014 um 21:33 schrieb Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu: On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Fabrice Couvreur wrote: Hi, I want to use the Lucida fonts. I understand that these are commercial fonts that I must buy. What should buy and where ? In the meantime, I tried to test the following file

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida fonts with ConTeXt

Am 29.01.2014 um 22:28 schrieb Fabrice Couvreur fabrice1.couvr...@gmail.com: If you have the type1 fonts How do we know ? Sorry, but I'm not at all an expert font ! The opentype version of the fonts have otf as files extension while the type 1 version consists of files with afm and pub as

[NTG-context] Lucida doesn't work in TL 2013 / latest ConTeXt

Hi, in TL 2013 neither \setupbodyfont[lucida] nor \setupbodyfont[lucidanova] works. The first one gives: !LuaTeX error: Invalid local font in font lbr! == Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produced! and the other one complains about ! Math error: parameter \Umathquad\displaystyle is

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida doesn't work in TL 2013 / latest ConTeXt

I'm sorry. I was pointing TEXMFLOCAL to the wrong (older) version of fonts without OT in the filename. However, the Type1 fonts still don't work. Mojca On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: Hi, in TL 2013 neither \setupbodyfont[lucida] nor \setupbodyfont[lucidanova] works.

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida doesn't work in TL 2013 / latest ConTeXt

On 4/19/2013 1:31 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: Hi, in TL 2013 neither \setupbodyfont[lucida] nor \setupbodyfont[lucidanova] works. The first one gives: !LuaTeX error: Invalid local font in font lbr! == Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produced! and the other one complains about !

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida doesn't work in TL 2013 / latest ConTeXt

On 4/19/2013 2:04 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: I'm sorry. I was pointing TEXMFLOCAL to the wrong (older) version of fonts without OT in the filename. However, the Type1 fonts still don't work. Did we change something with the type 1? In mkiv ... we probably never finished the mappings ... waste

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida doesn't work in TL 2013 / latest ConTeXt

Did we change something with the type 1? In mkiv ... we probably never finished the mappings ... waste of time now that we have otf. This makes me believe that I will eventually HAVE to purchase (and by purchase I really mean re-purchase) the OTF versions in order to use my Lucida fonts.

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida doesn't work in TL 2013 / latest ConTeXt

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 09:12:48AM -0500, Troy Henderson wrote: Did we change something with the type 1? In mkiv ... we probably never finished the mappings ... waste of time now that we have otf. This makes me believe that I will eventually HAVE to purchase (and by purchase I really

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida doesn't work in TL 2013 / latest ConTeXt

Given the amount of re-work that went into Lucida OT, a re-purchase is justified ;) That all depends on how it is being used. I'm not sure what advantage the OT version of the font would have to me over the Type1 version. If a reasonable justification could convince me, then I might agree.

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida doesn't work in TL 2013 / latest ConTeXt

On 4/19/2013 4:12 PM, Troy Henderson wrote: Did we change something with the type 1? In mkiv ... we probably never finished the mappings ... waste of time now that we have otf. This makes me believe that I will eventually HAVE to purchase (and by purchase I really mean re-purchase) the

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida doesn't work in TL 2013 / latest ConTeXt

On 4/19/2013 4:35 PM, Troy Henderson wrote: Given the amount of re-work that went into Lucida OT, a re-purchase is justified ;) That all depends on how it is being used. I'm not sure what advantage the OT version of the font would have to me over the Type1 version. If a reasonable

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida doesn't work in TL 2013 / latest ConTeXt

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Troy Henderson thend...@gmail.com wrote: Did we change something with the type 1? In mkiv ... we probably never finished the mappings ... waste of time now that we have otf. This makes me believe that I will eventually HAVE to purchase (and by purchase I

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida doesn't work in TL 2013 / latest ConTeXt

On 4/19/2013 8:16 PM, George N. White III wrote: On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Troy Henderson thend...@gmail.com mailto:thend...@gmail.com wrote: Did we change something with the type 1? In mkiv ... we probably never finished the mappings ... waste of time now that we have

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida fonts

On 12-9-2012 22:24, Troy Henderson wrote: yes, but the fonts are relatively cheap (esp for members) and you get a lot relatively is the keyword here as they are the same price that I paid for the Type 1 fonts 3 years ago. So, according to the store website, I essentially have to buy them

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida fonts

I was able to get the Type 1 versions working. It seems that the problem the whole time was an orphan kpsewhich living in /usr/bin. After removing it, TL2012's kpsewhich took over and everything is fine. Troy ___ If

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida fonts

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Troy Henderson wrote: yes, but the fonts are relatively cheap (esp for members) and you get a lot relatively is the keyword here as they are the same price that I paid for the Type 1 fonts 3 years ago. So, according to the store website, I essentially have

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida fonts

I guess I will take responsibility for my own actions then. ;) Actually, as long as the Type 1 fonts continue to work, I presume I have no need for anything more. Perhaps I'm just somewhat ignorant about fonts and have no idea what more complete (as Hans said) means when comparing the OpenType

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida fonts

best is to upgrade the lucida to opentype .. way less hassle and also more complete Would I have to pay for the OpenType versions since I have already purchased the Type1 versions? Troy ___ If your question is of

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida fonts

On 12-9-2012 14:05, Troy Henderson wrote: best is to upgrade the lucida to opentype .. way less hassle and also more complete Would I have to pay for the OpenType versions since I have already purchased the Type1 versions? yes, but the fonts are relatively cheap (esp for members) and you

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida fonts

yes, but the fonts are relatively cheap (esp for members) and you get a lot relatively is the keyword here as they are the same price that I paid for the Type 1 fonts 3 years ago. So, according to the store website, I essentially have to buy them again. Troy

[NTG-context] Lucida fonts

I have recently installed TeXLive 2012, and my Lucida (Type 1) fonts from TUG are installed in the texmf-local tree and function properly when using TeXLive 2011, but it seems that ConTeXt cannot find the fonts for 2012. The instuctions on the wiki do not seem to add a solution for me. I would

Re: [NTG-context] lucida ot

Am 25.04.2012 um 21:10 schrieb Mari Voipio: On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 20:53, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote: \definetypeface[mainface][rm][specserif] [Lucida Blackletter OT][default][features=default] \definetypeface[mainface][cg][calligraphy][lucidaot]

Re: [NTG-context] lucida ot

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 20:53, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote: \definetypeface[mainface][rm][specserif]  [Lucida Blackletter OT][default][features=default] \definetypeface[mainface][cg][calligraphy][lucidaot]             [default][features=default]

Re: [NTG-context] lucida ot

On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 12:36, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote: You need \starttypescript[serif][blackletter] but there is a shorter method: \definetypeface[lucidablackletter][rm][specserif][Lucida Blackletter OT] \setupbodyfont[lucidaot] \starttext Lucida Bright

Re: [NTG-context] lucida ot

Am 24.04.2012 um 18:57 schrieb Mari Voipio: On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 12:36, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote: You need \starttypescript[serif][blackletter] but there is a shorter method: \definetypeface[lucidablackletter][rm][specserif][Lucida Blackletter OT]

Re: [NTG-context] lucida ot

Am 20.04.2012 um 15:24 schrieb Mari Voipio: On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 14:37, Mari Voipio mari.voi...@iki.fi wrote: Now I can at least get started, and figure out about the Blackletter a bit later It turns out that I need it rather sooner than later ARGH, I give up! ConTeXt finds the

Re: [NTG-context] lucida ot

On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 12:36, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote: \definetypeface[lucidablackletter][rm][specserif][Lucida Blackletter OT] \setupbodyfont[lucidaot] \starttext Lucida Bright {\lucidablackletter Lucida Blackletter} Lucida Bright \stoptext ...and of

Re: [NTG-context] lucida ot

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 14:37, Mari Voipio mari.voi...@iki.fi wrote: Now I can at least get started, and figure out about the Blackletter a bit later It turns out that I need it rather sooner than later ARGH, I give up! ConTeXt finds the Lucida Blackletter OT font on my system (Mac OS X),

Re: [NTG-context] lucida ot

On 20-4-2012 15:24, Mari Voipio wrote: This is one of my more recent attempts at calling for the font: \starttypescript [rm] [blackletter] \definefontsynonym [Serif] [file:LucidaBlackletterOT.otf] \stoptypescript \definetypeface [blackletter] [rm][serif] [blackletter]

Re: [NTG-context] lucida ot

Hello, more font dummy questions about using Lucida OT... On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 21:06, Mari Voipio mari.voi...@iki.fi wrote: Now I can at least get started, and figure out about the Blackletter a bit later It turns out that I need it rather sooner than later as it is used in my source of

Re: [NTG-context] lucida ot

On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 00:25, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: Just copy the *.otf files to for instance a directory  yourtexroot/tex/texmf-fonts/fonts/opentype/data/lucidaot and then run  mtxrun --generate after that  \setupbodyfont[lucidaot] should work. It does! I had a prolonged

Re: [NTG-context] lucida ot

Am 13.04.2012 um 19:12 schrieb Mari Voipio: On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 00:25, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: Just copy the *.otf files to for instance a directory yourtexroot/tex/texmf-fonts/fonts/opentype/data/lucidaot and then run mtxrun --generate after that

Re: [NTG-context] lucida ot

On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 20:40, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote: I attached a modified version of the typescript file where I added calligraphic and handwriting, That was quick! And working, of course. :-) Not sure I like the word spacing of the handwriting font and

Re: [NTG-context] lucida ot

Hello! On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 22:50, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: It's now possible to order the new lucida open type (+math) fonts. If I ask nicely, could somebody who understands these things update the following wiki page accordingly? http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Lucida (I think my

Re: [NTG-context] lucida ot

On 6-4-2012 23:15, Mari Voipio wrote: Hello! On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 22:50, Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl wrote: It's now possible to order the new lucida open type (+math) fonts. If I ask nicely, could somebody who understands these things update the following wiki page accordingly?

[NTG-context] lucida ot

Hi, It's now possible to order the new lucida open type (+math) fonts. Pretty cheap for user group members, Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt

Re: [NTG-context] lucida ot

On Fri, 16 Mar 2012, Hans Hagen wrote: It's now possible to order the new lucida open type (+math) fonts. Great news! Finally another opentype math font. I am assuming that ConTeXt already has support for the fonts, right? Aditya

Re: [NTG-context] lucida ot

On 16-3-2012 22:03, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Fri, 16 Mar 2012, Hans Hagen wrote: It's now possible to order the new lucida open type (+math) fonts. Great news! Finally another opentype math font. I am assuming that ConTeXt already has support for the fonts, right? sure, see

Re: [NTG-context] lucida ot

Where to order? Is there special pricing for NTG members? Or else what does it cost? Hans van der Meer On 16 mrt. 2012, at 21:50, Hans Hagen wrote: Hi, It's now possible to order the new lucida open type (+math) fonts. Pretty cheap for user group members, Hans

Re: [NTG-context] lucida ot

On 16-3-2012 23:08, Meer, H. van der wrote: Where to order? Is there special pricing for NTG members? Or else what does it cost? http://tug.org/store/lucida/order.html - Hans Hagen |

[NTG-context] Lucida lVert rVert - no glyph printed

Hello everybody, Problem 1: I just notices that (at least for me) the $\lVert$ / $\rVert$ commands print no glyph with Lucida New Math. I search in the source files a bit, and found that in char-def.lua the lVert character is defined as U+02016 but in lucida-math.lfg it is mapped as U+02225. I

[NTG-context] Lucida \colon, \lll, \ggg

I see dat in Lucida (I am using \setupbodyfont[lucida,sans,10pt]) various math symbols are recognized (no error) but their glyphs stay empty in the typeset product. I know there has been some discussion on Lucida and talk of forgetting pfb's and waiting for an opentype version. But can this be

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida \colon, \lll, \ggg

Changing to the [mathtimes] font did help with the \lll and \ggg math symbols, present in mathtimes but not in lucida. But now the \oplus is absent in mathtimes whereas it is present in lucida. I am thus stuck with having two fonts missing different math symbols. Is Math Times suffering from

[NTG-context] Lucida hangs (?) on latest beta

Hello! Encouraged by the recent User Meeting, I'm experimenting with sans serif fonts, trying to find something that I could use all over our documents (European languages) and that would be acceptable to the design people. One of the possibilities would be Lucida, but I'm not having much

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida hangs (?) on latest beta

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Mari Voipio mari.voi...@iki.fi wrote: Hello! Encouraged by the recent User Meeting, I'm experimenting with sans serif fonts, trying to find something that I could use all over our documents (European languages) and that would be acceptable to the design

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida hangs (?) on latest beta

Am 12.10.2011 um 11:04 schrieb Mari Voipio: Hello! Encouraged by the recent User Meeting, I'm experimenting with sans serif fonts, trying to find something that I could use all over our documents (European languages) and that would be acceptable to the design people. One of the

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida hangs (?) on latest beta

On 12-10-2011 11:16, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 12.10.2011 um 11:04 schrieb Mari Voipio: Hello! Encouraged by the recent User Meeting, I'm experimenting with sans serif fonts, trying to find something that I could use all over our documents (European languages) and that would be acceptable

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida hangs (?) on latest beta

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: best wait till the otf version is available (Mojca will probably announce that here some day soon) and forget about the type 1's Uh ... the otf version will be free ? -- luigi

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida hangs (?) on latest beta

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:11, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com wrote: The lucidabr and lucida packages on CTAN are free, but the Lucida fonts are not: you must order them from TUG or another source to actually typeset anything in Lucida.  The TUG Lucida web pages explain the details -- see

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida hangs (?) on latest beta

On 12-10-2011 11:22, luigi scarso wrote: On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl wrote: best wait till the otf version is available (Mojca will probably announce that here some day soon) and forget about the type 1's Uh ... the otf version will be free ? no, but

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida hangs (?) on latest beta

Am 12.10.2011 um 11:23 schrieb Mari Voipio: On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:11, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com wrote: The lucidabr and lucida packages on CTAN are free, but the Lucida fonts are not: you must order them from TUG or another source to actually typeset anything in Lucida. The

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida hangs (?) on latest beta

Am 2011-10-12 um 11:04 schrieb Mari Voipio: Encouraged by the recent User Meeting, I'm experimenting with sans serif fonts, trying to find something that I could use all over our documents (European languages) and that would be acceptable to the design people. Besides Lucida you/they might

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida hangs (?) on latest beta

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:37, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote: When the fonts are in your Windows font directory you can try this: \usemodule[simplefonts] \setmainfont[Lucida Bright] It works! And I learned something new and useful today, now I finally understand

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida hangs (?) on latest beta

Am 12.10.2011 um 12:31 schrieb Mari Voipio: On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:37, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote: When the fonts are in your Windows font directory you can try this: \usemodule[simplefonts] \setmainfont[Lucida Bright] It works! And I learned

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida font?

I may finally have found the cause of this problem! My afm files are somewhat older and they turned out to have Macintosh line endings instead of Unix line endings. I guess Taco Hoekwater can tell us how detrimental this is. Hans van der Meer On 26 mrt 2011, at 22:34, Hans van der Meer wrote:

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida font?

On 28-3-2011 11:15, Hans van der Meer wrote: I may finally have found the cause of this problem! My afm files are somewhat older and they turned out to have Macintosh line endings instead of Unix line endings. I guess Taco Hoekwater can tell us how detrimental this is. you could try local

[NTG-context] Lucida font?

From the book Fonts in ConTeXt I got the impression that the Lucida font is working and decided to give it a try. I have the afm and type1 files in my texmf-local/fonts directory. However, this simple program: \setupbodyfont[lucida] \starttext Hello world! \stoptext takes forever. On my

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida in ConTeXt

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 21:46, Hans van der Meer wrote: On 22 december 2010 Wolfgang Schuster wrote in a reply: Give us more information, this works for me: \setupbodyfont[lucida] \starttext The trouble is, it is not working for me. My minimal testfile is:

[NTG-context] Lucida math

Am 22.12.2010 um 16:28 schrieb barney schwartz: As usual Ulrike is correct. I got context beta working BUT I LOST lucida math even though lucida text is working. as an aside bibliography IS sorted on author which does NOT work in the normal MikTeX release Give us more information, this

[NTG-context] Lucida New Math and simplefonts

Everything works fine with using simplefonts and Lucida, except the math fonts, which are taken from LM \usemodule[simplefonts] \setmainfont [Lucida Bright] \setmathfont [Lucida New Math] \starttext roman $x=3$ \stoptext o...@shania:/opt/context pdffonts 08-03-3.pdf name

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida New Math and simplefonts

Am 13.11.2010 um 21:03 schrieb Herbert Voss: Everything works fine with using simplefonts and Lucida, except the math fonts, which are taken from LM \usemodule[simplefonts] \setmainfont [Lucida Bright] \setmathfont [Lucida New Math] \setmathfont[Lucida] The commands loads only a

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida

Am 09.11.2010 08:45, schrieb Mojca Miklavec: Just do the following: 1.) extract http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/install/fonts/psfonts/bh/lucida.zip into /opt/context/texmf-fonts/ 2.) copy all *.pfb files into /opt/context/texmf-fonts/fonts/type1/bh/lucida 3.) run mktexlsr and mtxrun

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida

I read the message below and hoped my Lucida would work. On 9 nov 2010, at 08:45, Mojca Miklavec wrote: 2010/11/8 Herbert Voss wrote: Am 08.11.2010 14:42, schrieb Mojca Miklavec: 2010/11/8 Herbert Voss wrote: Has someone a working typescript file for the Lucida from TUG? Lucida should

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida

On 9-11-2010 10:10, Herbert Voss wrote: Am 09.11.2010 08:45, schrieb Mojca Miklavec: Just do the following: 1.) extract http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/install/fonts/psfonts/bh/lucida.zip into /opt/context/texmf-fonts/ 2.) copy all *.pfb files into

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida

Am 09.11.2010 10:10, schrieb Herbert Voss: Am 09.11.2010 08:45, schrieb Mojca Miklavec: it looks for yy filenames l??, but I have only pfb files with filenames from adobe (bh) I renamed the files and get now: ... load afm saving: lbl in cache report | lua: compiling

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida

Am 09.11.2010 14:08, schrieb Mojca Miklavec: I have no idea what happens if Type1 version of fonts is not the same as described in afm files, but if you don't have all the necessary Type1 files that are absolutely needed for Math, it probably won't work anyway. I don't know enough of Lucida's

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida

2010/11/9 Herbert Voss herbert.v...@fu-berlin.de: Am 09.11.2010 08:45, schrieb Mojca Miklavec: Just do the following: 1.) extract http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/install/fonts/psfonts/bh/lucida.zip into /opt/context/texmf-fonts/ 2.) copy all *.pfb files into

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida

Am 09.11.2010 14:08, schrieb Mojca Miklavec: it looks for yy filenames l??, but I have only pfb files with filenames from adobe (bh) Below is the list of files that ConTeXt assumes are present and which are supported by TUG's package for LaTeX (pfb files are to be bought, while afm are

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida

Ouch! Actually, Lucida worked with 2010.10.21 23:27 MKIV, but is broken in 2010.11.03 19:42 MKIV. I now see that I get the same error as you do: ! LuaTeX error ...text/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/math-vfu.lua:529: attempt to index local 'rotcev' (a nil value) stack traceback:

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida

Hi Mojca, Ouch! Indeed. Hans? Before I do an upload, can you check the beta on the ftp server? (In the process of documenting cld etc I clean up some code so there might be typos.) Hans -

[NTG-context] Lucida

Has someone a working typescript file for the Lucida from TUG? Herbert ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida

2010/11/8 Herbert Voss wrote: Has someone a working typescript file for the Lucida from TUG? Lucida should work out of the box (since beginning of 2010) if you have the files from TUG installed: % \usetypescript[lucida][ec] % for MKII \setupbodyfont[lucida] If you have any problems setting up

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida

Am 08.11.2010 14:42, schrieb Mojca Miklavec: 2010/11/8 Herbert Voss wrote: Has someone a working typescript file for the Lucida from TUG? Lucida should work out of the box (since beginning of 2010) if you have the files from TUG installed: % \usetypescript[lucida][ec] % for MKII

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida

On 8-11-2010 4:58, Herbert Voss wrote: Am 08.11.2010 14:42, schrieb Mojca Miklavec: 2010/11/8 Herbert Voss wrote: Has someone a working typescript file for the Lucida from TUG? Lucida should work out of the box (since beginning of 2010) if you have the files from TUG installed: %

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida

Am 08.11.2010 14:42, schrieb Mojca Miklavec: 2010/11/8 Herbert Voss wrote: Has someone a working typescript file for the Lucida from TUG? Lucida should work out of the box (since beginning of 2010) if you have the files from TUG installed: % \usetypescript[lucida][ec] % for MKII

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida

2010/11/8 Herbert Voss wrote: Am 08.11.2010 14:42, schrieb Mojca Miklavec: 2010/11/8 Herbert Voss wrote: Has someone a working typescript file for the Lucida from TUG? Lucida should work out of the box (since beginning of 2010) if you have the files from TUG installed: %

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida Fonts with MKIV

On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote: Am 19.02.10 15:45, schrieb luigi scarso: On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Troy Hendersonthend...@gmail.com  wrote: I am a LaTeX user for about 15 years, but I am very new ConTeXt.  I am having

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida Fonts with MKIV

On 20-2-2010 5:06, Mojca Miklavec wrote: I don't know how Hans' metric files look like, but: - texfont --ve=yandy ... doesn't do anything here - texfont --ve=bh ... creates a bunch of files, however *not* the T1 files which are of crucial importance to me; T1 (=ec) is only supported via virtual

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida Fonts with MKIV

On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:51, Hans Hagen wrote: On 20-2-2010 5:06, Mojca Miklavec wrote: I don't know how Hans' metric files look like, but: - texfont --ve=yandy ... doesn't do anything here - texfont --ve=bh ... creates a bunch of files, however *not* the T1 files which are of crucial

[NTG-context] Lucida Fonts with MKIV

I am a LaTeX user for about 15 years, but I am very new ConTeXt. I am having trouble using the complete set of Lucida fonts purchased from TUG. http://www.tug.org/store/lucida/ I have followed the first set of instructions at http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Lucida and the fonts work great for

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida Fonts with MKIV

When building the same document (that works for MKIV) Typo. I mean that work for MKII with MKIV (context), the text fonts are ... Troy ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to

Re: [NTG-context] Lucida Fonts with MKIV

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Troy Henderson thend...@gmail.com wrote: I am a LaTeX user for about 15 years, but I am very new ConTeXt.  I am having trouble using the complete set of Lucida fonts purchased from TUG. http://www.tug.org/store/lucida/ I have followed the first set of

  1   2   >