> Am 09.02.2015 um 14:34 schrieb Keith Schultz :
>
> Hi Hans, Idris, All,
>
> fonts and color are as such appearance.
> But, when one uses different fonts and colors or mix
> then then we add meaning or as you tend to call
> it structure.
>
> If their use does not add to the structure, then on
Hi Hans, Idris, All,
fonts and color are as such appearance.
But, when one uses different fonts and colors or mix
then then we add meaning or as you tend to call
it structure.
If their use does not add to the structure, then only one font style
and color is needed.
So actually, in the end they
On Sun, 8 Feb 2015 13:56:54 +0100
"Keith J. Schultz" wrote:
> As to setting up defaults, the question is their a generic usage of
> such ways of for so called highlights. These are, basically, by those
> that: 1) like this much fluff
> 2) idiosyncratic terminology
>
> 1) is supposed to avoided!
On 2/9/2015 12:42 AM, Keith Schultz wrote:
Hi Hans, Idris, All,
Then we should call it definetag of definestyletag ! It would describe
its function better!
Like I said I find the command highlight nice because it is alot easier than
define my own commands for setting styles with color!
it's n
Hi Hans, Idris, All,
Then we should call it definetag of definestyletag ! It would describe
its function better!
Like I said I find the command highlight nice because it is alot easier than
define my own commands for setting styles with color!
regards
Keith.
> Am 08.02.2015 um 15:01 sch
On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 14:51:44 -0700, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 2/8/2015 8:08 PM, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote:
Ok. It's clear that I'm doing a lot of guessing, so question: Can you
specify exactly what does *not* get tagged in xml-export? What exactly
do we need to worry about? Then we
On 2/8/2015 8:08 PM, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote:
Ok. It's clear that I'm doing a lot of guessing, so question: Can you
specify exactly what does *not* get tagged in xml-export? What exactly
do we need to worry about? Then we can go from there...
everything that has some structur
Hi Wolfgang,
On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 12:17:11 -0700, Wolfgang Schuster
wrote:
Am 08.02.2015 um 15:40 schrieb Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد
:
[…]
There seems to be a bug with \smallcaps. Otherwise I think the above
makes a good default set to start with.
Hans changed the effect o
> Am 08.02.2015 um 15:40 schrieb Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد
> :
>
> […]
>
> There seems to be a bug with \smallcaps. Otherwise I think the above makes a
> good default set to start with.
Hans changed the effect of “style=smallcaps”, in the ConTeXt used \sc when you
did this setups
b
On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 10:38:14 -0700, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 2/8/2015 3:40 PM, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote:
On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 07:01:31 -0700, Hans Hagen wrote:
the only reason why highlight exists is that it can be used to tag
stuff that is otherwise untagged in the exporter to
> Am 08.02.2015 um 13:56 schrieb Keith J. Schultz :
>
> Hi Hans, Irdis, All,
>
> It might sound like splitting hairs, but I find we should be careful how we
> call this beast!
>
> Basically, a highlight allows one so setup a font style and color to be
> applied
> to it contents.
>
> The prob
On 2/8/2015 3:40 PM, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote:
On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 07:01:31 -0700, Hans Hagen wrote:
the only reason why highlight exists is that it can be used to tag
stuff that is otherwise untagged in the exporter to xml
Ok, so I suppose \quote and \quotation already work
On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 07:01:31 -0700, Hans Hagen wrote:
the only reason why highlight exists is that it can be used to tag stuff
that is otherwise untagged in the exporter to xml
Ok, so I suppose \quote and \quotation already work in the exporter. The
following iteration then:
Hi Keith,
On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 05:56:54 -0700, Keith J. Schultz
wrote:
Also, not everybody would want the predefined styles and colors
so they will have to be changed in the setuphighlight anyway!
Indeed, but the point is not to predefine the styles but to predefine the
highlights. E.g.,
On 2/8/2015 1:56 PM, Keith J. Schultz wrote:
Basically, a highlight allows one so setup a font style and color to be
applied
to it contents.
the only reason why highlight exists is that it can be used to tag stuff
that is otherwise untagged in the exporter to xml which is why there is
nothin
Hi Hans, Irdis, All,
It might sound like splitting hairs, but I find we should be careful how we
call this beast!
Basically, a highlight allows one so setup a font style and color to be applied
to it contents.
The problem is that is this REALLY a Highlight!
A style and color is applied so, wh
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 12:33:00 -0700, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد
wrote:
\definehighlight[extraimportant]
[\c!command=\v!no,\c!style=\v!bolditalic]
\definehighlight[extraimportant]
[\c!command=\v!no,\c!style=\v!smallcaps]
% \definehighlight[extraimportant]
[\c!command=\v
Hi Hans,
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 05:53:08 -0700, Hans Hagen wrote:
Well, if you talk about automatic injection of commands 'short' is
irrelevant and also likely to clash.
Ok, fair enough. There is also function auto-completion...
Anyway, the problem with predefined highlights is that we won't
On 2/7/2015 2:07 AM, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote:
Dear gang,
Thinking of present and future documents (maximum flexibility in
converting from format to format), I'm moving from the standard {\em
text} to something like \definehighlight[emph][style=italic]. Here's the
question:
Doe
19 matches
Mail list logo
