Hello all,
Little road block I have hit trying to work on a project here and I need a
little advise on how to handle.
We have two domains, I'll call them domain 1 and 2, they are in two
physical locations. Domain 1 is on subnet 192.168.100.1, domain 2 is on
192.168.101.1. There is a VPN tunnel
if we are talking about Windows domains (when you refer to domain 1 and 2), as
long as you can reach the Domain controller from 192.168.101.x network you
should be fine.
For that you probably need to add a route to your router to reach from
192.168.101.x to 192.168.100.x network.
Regards,
I think this is more of a network routing question. AFAIK, AD doesn't care
if machines are on separate networks, as long as the DC's can communicate,
and the network is correctly routed.
I'd probably standup a DC for domain 1 at site 2, to minimize traffic
across the VPN.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at
Not sure you really need to do anything, at least initially. So right now
the domain 2 clients (192.168.101.x) are receiving DHCP addresses from
their local DC or some DHCP server on domain 2 that has a scope setup for
the 192.168.101.x address range, correct? When you flip these clients over
You will need to change DNS settings on those computers to point to a DNS
servers in Domain 1 either static or through the DHCP scope. Also setup a
new site in AD and define the subnet.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Christopher Bodnar
christopher_bod...@glic.com wrote:
Not sure you really
Thanks. Have reviewed it and it looks like it can do what we want it to do.
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:23 PM, N Parr npar...@mortonind.com wrote:
Simple index, very powerful, good tech support. We use it to do some
very similar things. Originally purchased because it can OCR bar codes.
Did she use the old headache excuse?
-sc
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 10:31 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: ping
Nothing at all last night...
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource
I have a DC from domain 1 sitting on domain 2's LAN. I can activate DHCP on
that server with the same 192.168.101.x scope, no problem. It is also
running DNS. The DC from domain 1 is happy up there on domain 2's LAN and
is replicating with the other domain 1 DCs. It seems too simple though. I
Are you upgrading the virtual devices within the VMs as well?
-sc
-Original Message-
From: Michael Leone [mailto:oozerd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 12:04 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: VMWare tools
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 9:50 AM, pdw1...@hotmail.com
rimshot!
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 06:42, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com wrote:
Did she use the old headache excuse?
-sc
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 10:31 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: ping
Nothing
I thought 2K was sh!t. I've had everyone else's thoughts on this already
though. But I still hate it. :-)
---Blackberried
-Original Message-
From: Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 10:40:08
To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Well now you can have mine weather you want them or not:
- Vastly improved GUI (bye bye ProgMan FileMan)
- Plug-N-Play
- Power Management (you can finally use this thing on a laptop)
- AD
- MMC
- EFS
- Dynamic Disks
- Fat32 support
- USB support
- UDF support (DVDs!)
- WFP
- WMI
-
Got it in one, I don't. It's like the fact I hate VW Golfs, they may have
loads of things people can reel off that are great, but I still can't stand
them.
Anyway, I put not so good because aside from the fact I didn't like it,
it was quickly superseded by 2003/XP. And putting AD as a feature
Don't forget your umbrella while you're raining on his parade. :)
* *
*ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of
Technology for the SMB market…
*
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.comwrote:
Well now you can have mine weather you
Alright then. I just think you'll find you're in the minority of people
who think 2000 wasn't good or great.
As an aside, I remember when XP came out, people called it Windows Legos
edition. People moved to XP because MS stopped updating 2000 and it wasn't
a bad upgrade, mainly a change in look
Thanks
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Harry Singh hbo...@gmail.com wrote:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/bobh/archive/2012/01/30/microsoft-pst-capture-tool-for-exchange-2010-and-office-365-released-deep-dive-technet-radio-episode-coming.aspx
Thanks, all. Sounds like Concur is worth checking...
Roger Wright
___
ELECTILE DYSFUNCTION: the inability to become excited over any of the
choices for President put forth by either party in the 2012 election year
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:58 PM, David Lum david@nwea.org wrote:
Fair enough. I guess I'm in the minority of people too (378,000 sales a day
can't be wrong, eh?) who think iPhones suck. But again, just my opinion.
Actually I must apologise for being uncharacteristically snappish today.
I'm not having a great time at the moment and there's no reason to be
Offering a contrary opinion is just one of the many services we offer.
Apparently backing it up with data is frowned upon.
-sc
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 11:20 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Win 8 CP - Initial thoughts?
Seems to me like a LOT of the issues then were timing. Didn't XP release like
the day after most folks starting getting comfortable with 2K? I didn't
really like 2000. Had too much NT for me, but that's just me. I think I
remember a lot of ANGST back then about MS cranking out OS's simply to
The move to XP was for many people driven by it was the unification
version where MS no longer developed the Win9x line.
XP was fine, but IMO it did more to fill any gaps the 9x crowd was
needing than it did introduce tangible beneficial change to the
NT-lineage predecessor.
-sc
From:
I remember way back then. I was the sole person supporting a school with
~600 computers. I went with NT for all teacher workstations for one simple
reason: stability. Windows 95 and 98 were horribly unstable. NT saved me
a ton of grief, at the cost of some grief in other areas, plug and play,
I may be off by a digit. Might be 256 MB of RAM, for some reason 128 MB is
sticking in my mind.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.comwrote:
I remember way back then. I was the sole person supporting a school with
~600 computers. I went with NT for all
I agree with that. I was focusing on it as an OS used in a professional
environment where NT or 2K had already been selected, which was my
experience back in the day.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.comwrote:
The move to XP was for many people driven by
I don't know if this subject has come up previously or not. So, here
goes:
We have a number of public facing W2K3 R2 Terminal Servers used by
customers. We would like the facility to restrict the number of customer
users to a specific number (say 50, at the moment it's the default of
Passwords in this case are stored in the Registry so you'd want to just make a
System State backup. I expect that will also get you the IIS Metabase so you'd
have everything you need to restore. Why don't you just schedule a Windows
Server Backup run once a night and grab that with your normal
based on colors, sizes, and shapes, we called the default XP interface
Fischer Price after the similarly colored kids toys :)
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.comwrote:
Alright then. I just think you'll find you're in the minority of people
who think 2000
This was a weird one.
For various reasons, I had an install which required use of a USB stick.
I copied the WIM to the C drive; applied it and rebooted. It would fail.
Watching safe mode; it would fail just after disk.sys.
After a doh moment. I applied it directly from the USB stick and
Can't you do some port forwarding?
---Blackberried
-Original Message-
From: Robert Jackson r...@walkermartyn.co.uk
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 17:24:21
To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues
Each RDP (or ICA) Listener will require a unique port.
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
http://www.CarlWebster.comhttp://www.carlwebster.com/
From: Robert Jackson [r...@walkermartyn.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 11:24 AM
To:
it played games well!
And thus the masses were won over...
-sc
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 12:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Win 8 CP - Initial thoughts?
Indeed.
Well, it was better on power management
Best phone ever. End of story.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5C6X9vOEkUhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5C6X9vOEkU
John
From: Steve Ens [mailto:stevey...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 12:27 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Win 8 CP - Initial thoughts?
start of rant.
I've
Citrix Single-sign on does that sort of thing and can store data in AD or an
NTFS share. It also lets you go nuts with password policy. As usual with
Citrix, probably not cheap (free with Platinum licenses though)
It also stores logons for all sorts of apps so users don't have to remember
Yeah, I got a 5 year old generic laptop that just fell over this
morning. I barely used it until this last year. I got an IBM and a Dell
that are over 10 years old and they run 24/7, both of them - still...
All because no one wants to pay for anything anymore, so let's show a
low price tag
I think these are worthwhile issues to discuss since we are the ones
supporting them. Let's face it - they will only become more integrated
into our lives, business and otherwise.
On 3/8/2012 12:57 PM, steve ens wrote:
start of rant.
I've been thinking about this for a while...and it bugs
Backend runs the gamut. The one we use stores info in AD or ADLDS or a back
end dB, we refused to update the AD schema for it so it's in ADLDS. There are
also smaller solutions that are totally standalone or can plug into other IdM
tools you already use.
Research Self Service Password Reset,
I dunnoI found myself reloading the O/S on XP boxes more frequently than I
did with W2k boxes. Both @work and @personal.
Regards,
Don Guyer
Directory and Messaging Services
Catholic Health East, ITSS
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 12:26 PM
I switched over to MagicJack, got my existing number ported. All went
well. No complaints. Can anyone confirm that there are no hidden monthly
taxes or fees? I switched from Ooma because of that, and as far as I was
able to tell there shouldn't be any.
Thanks
Christopher Bodnar
Enterprise
Best phone skit ever...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAG39jKi0lI
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 2:25 PM, John Hornbuckle
john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us wrote:
Best phone ever. End of story.
** **
www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5C6X9vOEkU
** **
** **
** **
John
** **
** **
Where I'm at there is a current project going on to populate AD accounts with a
simple identifier (unique to each user) for them to give when requesting
password resets/lockouts.
There's lots of software packages out there for self-service password
management, so they wouldn't have to contact
Late to the game (and I didn't see anything to indicate solved), but have
you checked your NIC speeds? Reason I ask is that my backups suddenly went
from 4 hours to 12 in a day. It drove me absolutely mental (there was a lot
of developer work going on and they had made some *innocent changes*)
I believe I have a slightly different situation than what you're
describing, but I could be wrong, so correct me if I am.
On this server, the FTP users are accounts in the local accounts base
- we chose to do that so that vendors/partners would each have a
protected directory with exclusive
RE: a simple identifier (unique to each user)
Here, we call those passwords. ;)
What happens if someone forgets their simple identifier? What happens if
someone over hears them giving it on the phone to reset a password? Can they
get it changed? How is this any different than an extra
Had it for years and all I do is pay every year or 2 and use it.
From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 1:56 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: MagicJack
I switched over to MagicJack, got my existing number ported. All went well. No
There isn't anything else to it. You obviously have the necessary routing
in place so just go ahead and activate that DHCP scope and deactivate the
old 192.168.101.x one.
It IS that simple.
From: James Kerr [mailto:cluster...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 9 March 2012 12:47 AM
To: NT
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com wrote:
I thought 2K was sh!t. I've had everyone else's thoughts on this already
though. But I still hate it. :-)
Well now you can have mine weather you want them or not:
Nitpicking:
- Vastly improved GUI (bye bye
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:19 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
Besides, moving on, I've said all I want to about this, it's all just my
opinion, etc. , etc.
That's the second time you've said this is all you're going to say. ;-)
-- Ben
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that
No fee's that I've ever seen. What hidden fee's are you talking about with the
Ooma? They tell you up front there will be at least $3-4/month in FCC, etc.
From: Christopher Bodnar [mailto:christopher_bod...@glic.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 1:56 PM
To:
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Steve Ens stevey...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been thinking about this for a while...and it bugs me. Why do we need
to always compare our phones/devices/OSes and defend them so much?
Humans seem to have a biological imperative to divide things into
two groups,
On Thu, *Mar 1*, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Nothing at all last night...
On Thu, *Mar 8*, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Steven M. Caesare scaes...@caesare.com
wrote:
Did she use the old headache excuse?
Your witty response would have been more impressive if it hadn't taken a
I did check that - easy to do on a VM.
Good thought though.
Thanks.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:39, Cameron cameron.orl...@gmail.com wrote:
Late to the game (and I didn't see anything to indicate solved), but have
you checked your NIC speeds? Reason I ask is that my backups suddenly went
from
Nits got no chance around you, eh? :-)
--Original Message--
From: Ben Scott
To: NT System Admin Issues
ReplyTo: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Win 8 CP - Initial thoughts?
Sent: 8 Mar 2012 21:52
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:19 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
Besides,
So you know the passwords, you know the config, you set the perms, so why not
simply
keep a powershell script of all the account creation etc updated. It sounds
like like its fairly
repetitive and you could simply loop through all the user/directory creation,
apply acl's etc from
the list of
You, nitpick?
NO??
IIRC, the new shell was introduced with NT 4.0, or maybe some kind of
option pack to same.
That was an alpha/beta level shell preview, and not released code. I
used it.. it was buggy in several aspects, although it got better over
time. I don't recall that it ever was
Don't make him say it again. :)
-sc
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 4:52 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Win 8 CP - Initial thoughts?
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:19 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com
wrote:
That's different and dangerous talk you are spouting, Scott,
-sc
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 4:57 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Win 8 CP - Initial thoughts?
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Steve Ens
Look, I had 3+K messages... so I figured that because February was
different (and thus dangerously evil), I'd dean all the messages before
1 MAR and start from there.
Besides, my wittiness is like a fine wine.. you can't rush it. Also, it
can go sour and cause headaches.
-sc
From: Ben
That's a good theory, and indeed part of the solution, but in
practice, people are fallible, and will fail to keep the script
updated.
So, what's needed is a script to read the current configuration and
produce output that can be fed back into (another|this) script to
recreate the site on a new
That's a good theory, and indeed part of the solution, but in
practice, people are fallible, and will fail to keep the script
updated.
While I appreciate that, invariably that line of thinking can be
applied to even your own design as someone will always find
a way to fsck up anything, lol. You
On top of what already has been suggested the only item in AD you should do
is associate that subnet (101) with the site in Domain 1 inside of the AD
sites and services snap-in.
On Thursday, March 8, 2012, James Hill falc...@gmail.com wrote:
There isn’t anything else to it. You obviously have
Robocopy.
From: Cesare' A. Ramos [mailto:cra...@idfllc.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 9:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Windows File Archive
Hellos all.
Looking for a utility to scan a storage server and copy off files that have not
been accessed in the past 180 days to an
Robocopy with /MINAGE switch.
You can exclude any files newer than your limit.
From: Cesare' A. Ramos [cra...@idfllc.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 7:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Windows File Archive
Hellos all.
Looking for a utility to scan
The problem with you damn do-gooders trying to answer his question is:
* he hasn't stated what system he's working on,
* or copying to,
* or what he's tried,
* or what he's considered.
Is robocopy a windows only solution? (All I know it as, and I'm not interested
enough to look it up).
Some of you on this list need to get out more or understand what the purpose of
a professional exchange is, as it is my understanding these lists are for. At
times we all need to bounce things off each other, as no one person has all the
answers.
In addition, questions are simple at times
Someone ordered red wine and wanted to watch Idol.
On Thursday, March 8, 2012, Don Ely don@gmail.com wrote:
Hotel bar out of alcohol again? ;o)
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Gary Slinger gary.slin...@gmail.com
wrote:
The problem with you damn do-gooders trying to answer his question
I bring my own. Fuckmonkey was a timely volunteer for me to vent. fuck him.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely don@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 18:43:22
To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues
It's professional exchange, asshole, not professional hand-holding, hug the
tree, kindergarten.
-Original Message-
From: Cesare' A. Ramos cra...@idfllc.com
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 02:46:16
To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues
That was last nights douchebag. Tonight, they had Grease on, which was
tolerable.
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 21:48:53
To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues
Think it's about time to set a Gary rule.
Gary Slinger gary.slin...@gmail.com wrote:
I bring my own. Fuckmonkey was a timely volunteer for me to vent.
fuck him.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely don@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 18:43:22
To: NT System Admin
You are an awfully angry man.
Shauna Hensala
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
---
To manage subscriptions click here:
I certainly wouldn't call this professional behavior.
On Mar 8, 2012 7:05 PM, Gary Slinger gary.slin...@gmail.com wrote:
I bring my own. Fuckmonkey was a timely volunteer for me to vent. fuck
him.
From: Don Ely don@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 18:43:22
While I may not employ Gary's colorful vocabulary, I agree with his basic
sentiment.
I would think a solution would include such a capability. If you are
rolling your own then I suggest testing as I have had false positives with
robocopy.
On Thursday, March 8, 2012, Cesare' A. Ramos
You want to limit the number of user sessions on each TS?
Use a CSS/ACE type load balancer (or DNS round robin), and put the session
limit on all the servers?
Or you only want a limit for one particular customer's users, but want everyone
else's as unlimited?
From: Robert Jackson
Very few if any of the folks here would know of whom you speak... :(
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr
michealespin...@gmail.com wrote:
Today is a sad day for many of us. Let it slide.
--
Espi
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Rod Trent rodtr...@myitforum.com wrote:
On the otherhand, a bitch-slap can be a healthy and needed aspect of
Apprenticeship. It makes people think - about thinking for themselves and
to make greater considerations of the details involved with
whatever their question may be - before they ask an incomplete question, or
try to move
Ugg, pardon the typos. I'm tired. Its been a long day.
--
Espi
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr
michealespin...@gmail.com wrote:
On the otherhand, a bitch-slap can be a healthy and needed aspect of
Apprenticeship. It makes people think - about thinking for themselves
Valid points raised in this thread -- folks lazily asking unresearched
questions, without providing any background or evidence of effort
whatsoever, AND the people who answer the former, drag down these
forums.
Someone drops a mighty lame LMGTFY like this one? Ignore, or
reprimand, with courtesy
Do tell.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 19:23, Micheal Espinola Jr
michealespin...@gmail.com wrote:
Today is a sad day for many of us. Let it slide.
--
Espi
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Rod Trent rodtr...@myitforum.com wrote:
Think it's about time to set a Gary rule.
Gary Slinger
And these days, the bitch slaps are rather... Light.
On Mar 8, 2012 8:01 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr michealespin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On the otherhand, a bitch-slap can be a healthy and needed aspect of
Apprenticeship. It makes people think - about thinking for themselves and
to make greater
Calling someone as asshole is acceptable, simply because they asked an
incomplete question? Or asking if they are related to carpet boy?
That's ad hominem, unnecessary and unprofessional. Whilst we might have
disagreements, let's keep the conversation civil, and talking about the topic
and not
What is socially acceptable definitely varies, although I agree
it wasn't particularly civil. But understanding the day - I chock it up to
the weight of the day. At least its not a common occurrence.
I was only commenting on what sparked it. I wouldn't have said those
things myself, but I
81 matches
Mail list logo
