Re: Missing notifications from Jenkins

Hi, Gavin's recent message (Aug 14, "Jenkins Notification updates") to all PMCs seems to suggest some changes in Jenkins notifications. Best, Jukka On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 3:36 AM Michael Dürig wrote: > > Hi, > > It seems we are not getting email notifications from our

Re: Are dumb segments dumb?

aw repository size when evaluating possible improvements. Also, the number and size of data segments are good size metrics to look at in addition to total disk usage. BR, Jukka Zitting On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 5:55 AM Francesco Mari <mari.france...@gmail.com> wrote: > The impa

Re: JCR Binary Usecase - UC7 - Random write access in binaries

random write access to be implemented efficiently if there's enough demand. Best, Jukka Zitting On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 10:25 AM Michael Marth <mma...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > > >...but the limitation is also present in the JCR API, right? > > yes, that is my understanding >

Re: svn commit: r1743322 - in /jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-auth-external/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/spi/security/authentication/external: TestIdentityProvider.java impl/jmx/SyncMBeanImplTest

the operation that's suppose to lead to a > >new timestamp? > > that might well be. i will take a look. > The Clock class [1] is convenient for this purpose. [1] https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/blob/trunk/oak-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/stats/Clock.java Best, Jukka Zitting

Re: parent pom env.OAK_INTEGRATION_TESTING

See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-163 for original discussion about the environment flag. Back then the integration tests were only just becoming too long to run as a part of the regular build, so it made sense to keep that option around for people who wanted the earlier behavior. But

Re: oak-run public distribution

making oak-run available on the central Maven repository, which we can do regardless of whether we also post the jar on the Jackrabbit downloads page. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: NodeStore#checkpoint api reevaluation

. BR. Jukka Zitting

Re: TarMK compaction, proposed update

to leverage the TarMK support for in-place updates to binaries. - We could keep track of how much space was needed for the last compaction and only trigger the next one after at least say 25% more space has been used. BR, Jukka Zitting torstai 7. elokuuta 2014 Alex Parvulescu alex.parvule

Re: How to implement a queue in Oak?

semantics based on millisecond timings from the system clock should be good enough. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: How to implement a queue in Oak?

to find the one that should be processed first. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: How to implement a queue in Oak?

the consumers as the repository itself does not provide strict guarantees in this area (unless you want to rely on the features of specific backends like the TarMK). -- Jukka Zitting

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.2

Hi, On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Alex Parvulescu alexparvule...@apache.org wrote: Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.2. [x] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.2 BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Oak 1.0.2 release issues

(c:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc\hosts on Windows) might help: 140.211.11.4 svn.apache.org Every now and then I've seen similar problems when trying to cut releases using the EU mirror of svn.apache.org. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Oak 1.0.2 release issues

Hi, On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Alex Parvulescu alex.parvule...@gmail.com wrote: I managed to create the release, but now it fails at deploy time... Have you updated your cached repository.apache.org credentials since the recent Apache password reset? BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Some more benchmarks

, but the benchmark got stuck in ConcurrentReadTest. I'll re-try today and will file a bug if I can reproduce the problem. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: svn commit: r1607127 - /jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/segment/SegmentNodeState.java

Hi, On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 12:05 PM, alexparvule...@apache.org wrote: -if (wasCompactedTo(that)) { +if (that.wasCompactedTo(this)) { Nice catch! BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Some more benchmarks

Hi, On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: I also tried including MongoMK results, but the benchmark got stuck in ConcurrentReadTest. I'll re-try today and will file a bug if I can reproduce the problem. I guess it was a transient problem. Here

Re: svn commit: r1607081 - in /jackrabbit/oak/trunk: oak-commons/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/commons/mk/ oak-commons/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/commons/mk/ oak-core/src/main/j

this (and all the other similar lines) be: return read 0 ? -1 : read; ? My build gets stuck in an infinite loop because the read() method returns 0. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: svn commit: r1607081 - in /jackrabbit/oak/trunk: oak-commons/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/commons/mk/ oak-commons/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/commons/mk/ oak-core/src/main/j

Hi, On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 9:57 AM, ste...@apache.org wrote: -return rep.getBlobStore().readBlob(blobId, pos, buff, off, length); +int read = rep.getBlobStore().readBlob(blobId, pos, buff

Re: svn commit: r1606639 - in /jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-doc/src/site/markdown: FAQ.md nodestore/segmentmk.md

Hi, On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 4:10 AM, alexparvule...@apache.org wrote: OAK-1804 TarMK compaction - docs Nice, thanks! BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: [DISCUSS] - QueryIndex selection

, but I've been wrong before so I think it would be a good idea to keep our options open here. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: [DISCUSS] - QueryIndex selection

the user load the node using the NodeIterator? As Thomas said, we already do that. Since we want to estimate full cost of executing a query, including the iteration over the query results, we need to take also those costs into account when making a decision on which index to use. BR, Jukka

Re: Oak-run backup trouble (heap memory, external blob)

compaction does, i.e. leave external blobs as-is and perhaps output a message that informs the user about the need to use a different mechanism to back up the BlobStore contents 2) Add command line options for configuring the BlobStore to be used for accessing external blobs. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Builder VS State

-lucene for such a purpose. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: [DISCUSS] - QueryIndex selection

the (1 + ...) term from OAK-1910. But getting to that point may be a bit tricky, especially because of access control. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: [DISCUSS] - QueryIndex selection

be able to refactor the API to better accommodate such indexes. BR, Jukka Zitting

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.1 released

The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.1. The release is available for download at: http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html See the full release notes below for details about this release. Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak

Re: Name index

-configurable alternative like 2 might be just fine, or in alternative 1 it would be possible to explicitly configure some exclude rules like I don't care about the 'foo' name, nor the '/bar' subtree. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Name index

, jcr:lastModified: 1, jcr:mimeType: 1, :node: 1, :property, 5, :size, 15827 } (Of course, to save storage space, such single-node index data would not actually be stored in the repository, only aggregated to the index entries higher up the tree.) BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: [DISCUSS] - QueryIndex selection

guesses about the overall query performance, not just the index lookup time. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: [DISCUSS] - QueryIndex selection

/jackrabbit-oak/blob/jackrabbit-oak-1.0.0/oak-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/query/QueryImpl.java#L810 [3] https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/blob/jackrabbit-oak-1.0.0/oak-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/index/property/OrderedPropertyIndex.java#L73 BR, Jukka

Re: [DISCUSS] - QueryIndex selection

either [2] or [3] should be adjusted to fix the cost calculation. Yes, you are right. Currently the formula assumes that the query engine doesn't load the node. That's not correct. I created OAK-1910 to track this. Thanks! BR, Jukka Zitting

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.1

Hi, On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.1. The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. The vote passes

Name index

. Alternatively it might be possible to adjust the index structure to avoid this problem, though for now I don't see any good way of doing so. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: [DISCUSS] - QueryIndex selection

introduced in AdvancedQueryIndex/IndexPlan. In practically all cases the index lookups will be asymptotically faster than looking up all the paths returned by the index. Thus I don't think there is value in trying to make detailed estimates about the cost of the index lookup. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: [DISCUSS] - QueryIndex selection

cost. If there are more entries, but they are all in memory, then that's better than less entries, but you need a disk read for each entry. That's what the javadocs talk about. There's no way for a query index to know whether a particular node is cached in memory or not. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: [DISCUSS] - QueryIndex selection

Hi, On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-06-18 16:02 GMT+02:00 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com: On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote: should we just return the number of estimated entries

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.1

Hi, On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Chetan Mehrotra chetan.mehro...@gmail.com wrote: Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.099 sec FAILURE! testCompactionMap

Re: The p/ javadoc antipattern

Hi, [resurrecting an old thread, since it seems we still have some affected javadocs in Oak] On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: A trivially minor, but long-standing annoyance of mine seems to be creeping over from Jackrabbit to Oak: For some reason

[VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.1

[ ] -1 Do not release this package because... My vote is +1. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: non-space whitespace in name

such content on a case-by-case basis. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Close method on NodeStore API

knows the implementation class and shouldn't need such checks. See for example the OakFixture class in oak-run, or the *NodeStoreService classes on oak-core for how the lifecycle is already being handled. The console code should IMHO do something similar. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: increase heap size for ci/travis

Hi, On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Marcel Reutegger mreut...@adobe.com wrote: Ideally we can reduce the memory usage and don¹t need to increase it. +1 If we do need to increase heap size, the setting to change is the test.opts.memory property in oak-parent/pom.xml. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: oak-parent: DB2 dependency with system scope

/lib/ext. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Oak 1.0.1 release plan

in MongoDocumentStore It looks a bit complicated, so I didn't want to just merge it without asking. Should be included it in 1.0.1? If yes, can someone who's closer to MongoMK do the merging? BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: oak-run command line

Hi, On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote: OK; in which case I'd propose to change the tool to return with a helpful error message :-) +1 Works for me. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: oak-run command line

specify no test cases, then no tests get executed. Same with the fixtures. BR, Jukka Zitting

Oak 1.0.1 release plan

, Jukka Zitting

Re: svn commit: r1601310 - /jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-run/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/run/Main.java

Hi, On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 5:43 AM, Alex Parvulescu alex.parvule...@gmail.com wrote: Shouldn't the path be: 'path = matcher.group(6);' ? Indeed, thanks! I was already wondering why I'm not seeing the output I was expecting... Updated in r1601354. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: buildbot svn can't open .svn/lock

Hi, On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Davide Giannella giannella.dav...@gmail.com wrote: Can I do any investigation on my own? Has it been already chased by someone? Should I file an infra ticket? Probably best to file an INFRA ticket for this. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Embedding Groovy in oak-run for Oak Shell (OAK-1805)

relevant given modern network speeds and disk sizes. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Embedding Groovy in oak-run for Oak Shell (OAK-1805)

. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Embedding Groovy in oak-run for Oak Shell (OAK-1805)

component and leave oak-run as-is? BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Embedding Groovy in oak-run for Oak Shell (OAK-1805)

customizations/extensions easier (and avoids things like the Lucene version conflict). BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0 released

somewhat similar to jackrabbit-standalone. It however still needs some work so I didn't feel it's time yet to provide it as a direct download. Oak 1.1 perhaps... BR, Jukka Zitting

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0

Hi, On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0. The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. The vote passes

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0

-related questions. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Session.login slow on Java 1.6

performance drains, like the queries that are currently executed to look up the authenticated principal. Those might also explain the memory impact you're seeing. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Snapshot artefacts in the release

Hi, On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: oak-mk-perf: See http://markmail.org/message/neiolq4gd2kjseod I dropped oak-mk-perf from the 1.0 branch in revision 1593066. See OAK-1803. BR, Jukka Zitting

[VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0

[ ] -1 Do not release this package because... My vote is +1. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0

Hi, Thanks all who voted so far! Since the recent email outage delayed the delivery of the vote message (full copy below), I'm extending the vote period for another 72 hours. BR, Jukka Zitting On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, A candidate

Re: oak-mk-perf?

Hi, On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:06 AM, Stefan Guggisberg stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Do we still need the oak-mk-perf component for something? We added it in OAK-335, but have since implemented a much more

Re: Snapshot artefacts in the release

a chance to improve and fix the documentation over time. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Snapshot artefacts in the release

was doing to the code. I'm in favour of moving oak-docs to a location of its own if we at the same time can somehow keep the close integration for devs. If people prefer, we could keep the docs within trunk and just drop them from the release branch. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on oak-trunk-win7

(org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.ConcurrentConflictTest): expected:1000 but was:990 BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Avoiding conflicts (OAK-1717)

. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: persistence knowledge in oak-core/commit hooks

component. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on oak-trunk-win7

Hi, On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:59 PM, build...@apache.org wrote: BUILD FAILED: failed compile Looks like a buildbot/windows issue: Failed to delete E:\slave14\oak-trunk-win7\build\oak-commons\target\oak-commons-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: [jira] [Assigned] (OAK-1572) Add checkpoint operation to the filestore jmx api

Hi, On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Jukka Zitting (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote: Jukka Zitting reassigned OAK-1572: Oops, sorry about that. Jira has too eager keyboard shortcuts... BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: svn commit: r1560611 - in /jackrabbit/oak/trunk: oak-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/mongomk/util/ oak-core/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/mongomk/ oak-jcr/sr

for determining the user database against which credentials if passed needs to be validated. The credentials in any case need to be valid for the database that holds the repository, so I don't see why we couldn't use it for this purpose. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Adding ProviderType and ConsumerType annotation to interfaces in exported packages

custom implementations wouldn't be expected. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Review currently exported package version for 1.0 release

backwards compatibility effort will be required down the line. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: svn commit: r1586836 - /jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-upgrade/pom.xml

Hi, On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Alex Parvulescu alex.parvule...@gmail.com wrote: the same issue affects the 1.0 branch, can I merge this in? +1. The fix has no effect on functionality, so there's near zero risk in merging. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Oak 1.0 (and 0.20) release plan

is to drop the 'alpha version warning' in the release notes from the 1.0 branch, and possibly the trunk (and the downloads page). Jukka would you like to do the honors? Thanks, done! Let's update the downloads page when the 1.0 release goes out. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: svn commit: r1587906 - in /jackrabbit/oak/branches/1.0: oak-core/ oak-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/memory/ oak-lucene/ oak-lucene/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/pl

, as otherwise we'll have a hard time properly tracking the merge history with mergeinfo. I removed these subdirectory mergeinfos in revision 1588040. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on oak-trunk-win7

see if the problem occurs again before I look deeper into this. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Upgrade to Oak and Mandatory CommitHooks

for a summary. All security-related hooks are now included and the rest I've reviewed/enabled on a case-by-case basis. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: compile broken on Java6

guess a workaround would be to add the annotation library to the build classpath of oak-upgrade on Java 6. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: compile broken on Java6

Hi, On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 4:03 AM, Jukka Zitting ju...@zitting.name wrote: Hmm, interesting. I guess a workaround would be to add the annotation library to the build classpath of oak-upgrade on Java 6. Done in revision 1586836. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: svn commit: r1586243 - in /jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-lucene/src/main: java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/index/lucene/OakCodec.java resources/ resources/META-INF/ resources/META-INF/services/ r

Hi, On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:48 AM, alexparvule...@apache.org wrote: OAK-1702 Create a benchmark for Full text search - applied codec patch by Tommaso Teofili As mentioned in the issue, I'm not convinced that this is a good idea. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: How to get ContentRepository ?

Hi, On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Tobias Bocanegra tri...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: @Reference private Repository repository; which repository is that? javax.jcr.Repository? javax.jcr.Repository. that one

Re: jackrabbit-oak build #4085: Errored

, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 97.983 sec FAILURE! verifyMembers(org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.RepositoryGroupMemberUpgradeTest) Time elapsed: 41.335 sec ERROR! javax.jcr.RepositoryException: Failed to copy content Sorry about that. I'm on it... BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: How to get ContentRepository ?

Hi, On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Tobias Bocanegra tri...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm, it should be available by default in a Sling environment: yes, in sling. but what if we run oak w/o sling? It's up

Re: Slow full text query performance and Lucene Index handling in Oak

something like 20) and access the path and the title property of the matching nodes. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Login with userid that contains windows domain

components. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: FileStoreTest failing

assumptions. Fixed in revision 1584381. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: svn commit: r1583285 - /jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/value/ValueImpl.java

that not all Blob implementations have a blobId like in BlobStoreBlob. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: svn commit: r1583994 - in /jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-core/src: main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/blob/datastore/OakFileDataStore.java test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/blob/data

to figure out how the same functionality could be achieved more efficiently. BR, Jukka Zitting

Oak 1.0 (and 0.20) release plan

/u7dsue7ezb4cd4ox [2] http://markmail.org/message/lgvbvw742zryhlmp BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: roadmap update

/6kkkdmyf6ni5pgte [2] http://markmail.org/message/yydr4ry7m3tmjinf BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: svn commit: r1583285 - /jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/value/ValueImpl.java

the Blob interface accordingly and have the underlying implementation return such a value if available. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: svn commit: r1583285 - /jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/value/ValueImpl.java

getContentIdentity() { return getRecordId().toString(); } BR, Jukka Zitting

oak-mk-perf?

someone says otherwise, I'm inclined to drop the component. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Multi-value properties and order

or something else other times? The value list of a multi-valued property always keeps its order. For example, we use a multi-valued property to store the order of the children of an orderable node. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Multi-value properties and order

the SetPropertyValueTest.testSet*Array* methods. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Checkstyle, eclipse and .gitignore

-core, a .checkstyle file. Is it fine if I add it to the global .gitignore to avoid any mistaken commit? Sounds good to me. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: BufferUnderflowException with SegmentMK

) at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.segment.Segment.loadString(Segment.java:294) Sounds related to OAK-1566. My recent GC work seems to have introduced some subtle bug in the way segments are written, which on some occasions triggers errors like these. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Inefficient backup on TarMK

to another within a given repository. Perhaps the comparison is between content in the source repository and that in the backup repository? In that case the segment identifiers wouldn't match, and the comparison would slow down as described. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 0.19

in revision 1579631. BR, Jukka Zitting

Re: Inefficient backup on TarMK

Hi, On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Alex Parvulescu alex.parvule...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.comwrote: Perhaps the comparison is between content in the source repository and that in the backup repository? In that case the segment

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >