Re: [OM Cooker] Fwd: Re: [Cooker - Feature #55: Make python 3.x main, start deprecating 2.x] (New) Make python 3.x main, start deprecating 2.x

Hi, On 2014-05-24 17:29, symbian...@mandrivausers.ro wrote: Feature #55: Make python 3.x main, start deprecating 2.x This is a huge mistake , fedora in the last 2 years helps the developers to switch to pyhton3egg, and they have all the python under WIP still now, It's just a proposal, no

Re: [OM Cooker] QtParted ported to Qt5

On 2014-06-01 13:50, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: Hi, I've ported QtParted to Qt5, given we may want to use it or parts of it in the new installer. Btw, KDE Partition Manager may be a promising alternative. http://kde.org/applications/system/kdepartitionmanager/ ttyl bero

Re: [OM Cooker] python2 - python3 migration

On 2014-06-15 18:28, Jeffrey Johnson wrote: Instead of having *both* pythons (which is more 2 evils are better than 1), OMA should consider being the first linux distro to complete the transition from python2 - python3 and focus on incrementally porting any/all remnant legacy packages

Re: [OM Cooker] my abf account cracked

On 2014-06-15 16:54, symbian...@mandrivausers.ro wrote: Seems that that some shithead broke into my abf account and start doing builds, Did the guy do any harm (e.g. build bad packages?) Also, is there any chance this was an error rather than a hack? (e.g. you met someone else who works with

[OM Cooker] Interesting clang compiler flag benchmarks

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articleitem=clang35_compiler_optsnum=2 Interesting conclusions: - -Oz is almost always as fast or faster than -Os, so no need to bother with -Os - -Oz vs. -Ofast doesn't always have a clear winner, we may really need to override on a per-package basis -

Re: [OM Cooker] Template spec files

On 2014-07-18 14:22, Denis Silakov wrote: Hi all, In addition to different packaging policies in our wiki, I've created a simple page with spec file templates for different cases: http://wiki.rosalab.ru/en/index.php/Template_Spec_Files [2] Hi, I did pretty much the same thing a while

Re: [OM Cooker] Getting on the Same Page

On 2014-09-09 19:50, symbian...@mandrivausers.ro wrote: Il 09/09/2014 05:44, Robert Xu ha scritto: * Yes, we have switched to LLVM/Clang as our default compiler for 2015.0. You don't have to use it; simply set CC=gcc and CXX=g++ in your spec file. This would be awesome, but can you tell me what

Re: [OM Cooker] Getting on the Same Page

On 2014-09-09 21:09, symbian...@mandrivausers.ro wrote: checking for libsanitizer support... yes checking for libvtv support... yes checking for i586-mandriva-linux-gnu-gcc... /usr/bin/clang checking whether the C compiler works... no configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables

Re: [OM Cooker] clang

On 2014-09-12 20:40, symbian...@mandrivausers.ro wrote: And since I'm curious , I've also look into buildlogs, funny that in 20 buildlogs clang error: clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) or As in /usr/bin/aarch64-mandriva-linux-gnu-ld:

Re: [OM Cooker] libxml2 python3 bindings - python2 bindings

On 2014-10-02 16:07, Robert Xu wrote: Hi Cris, I needed itstool to build seahorse, but it doesn't seem to want to work with python3: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/itstool, line 1516, in module doc.apply_its_rules(not(opts.nobuiltins), params=params) File

Re: [OM Cooker] [council] Fosdem

On 2014-10-03 18:59, Kate Lebedeff wrote: Hi all We are approaching another FOSDEM quite fast, and time will run quicker and quicker as Christmas comes around the corner:) https://fosdem.org/2015/ [1] We will apply for the booth, who would want to volunteer with a presentation or

Re: [OM Cooker] [om-council] Indiegogo - your personal profiles

Hi, guess Chwido and I need an invitation... ttyl bero On 2014-12-09 14:42, Kate Lebedeff wrote: Hi Anurag I am sending you the invitation now. Once having an invitation, a member has to upload his picture and describe himself personally, I can not do it! Indiegogo

[OM Cooker] Does KDE5 work for you?

Hi, I just tried to install KDE5 on my notebook, and found it doesn't work at all (the splash screen covers everything and never goes away) -- after finding it works quite well on my desktop. I'm not sure what's causing this yet (Intel GPU in the notebook vs. AMD GPU in the desktop? Race

Re: [OM Cooker] Does KDE5 work for you?

Hi, no, I'm talking about ksplashqml -- long time after plymouth is done. ttyl bero On 2014-12-19 09:40, Tomasz Gajc wrote: Hi are you referring to Plymouth as a splash Wysłano z Samsung Grand Neo Orange Polska 19 gru 2014 00:17 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer b...@lindev.ch napisał

Re: [OM Cooker] export CC=gcc

Hi, On 2014-12-20 17:23, symbianflo wrote: can somebody with credentials add anthy ( https://abf.io/openmandriva/anthy ) to : https://wiki.openmandriva.org/en/Packages_forcing_gcc_use Done PS: Open it to public will really improve the collaboration AFIC ounce I ask this as for the

Re: [OM Cooker] [om-council] FOSDEM

2 pieces of good news: I can make it and we won't need to pay either (Linaro is paying for my trip -- thanks!), and the talk about our switch to clang is approved. ttyl bero On 2014-12-20 19:56, Kate Lebedeff wrote: Hi all Our request for the stand on FOSDEM is approved. The

Re: [OM Cooker] TC meeting ?

Hi, On 2015-03-18 15:28, Tomasz Gajc wrote: are you intersted to participate in our Technical Comitee meeting on 2015-03-24 ? Probably can't make it -- I'll be at http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/android-builders-summit If yes, then please give some feedback, also a topics proposals

Re: [OM Cooker] cooker broken jails

On 2015-02-24 11:34, Colin Close wrote: Hi All On Denis's advice I ran:-urpmi wget curl urpmi perl-URPM mock-urpm genhdlist2 tree git rpm ruby python-rpm5utils python-rpm urpm-tools timezone on my cooker box which failed with:- Failed on file conflict libdb-6.so from lib64db6.1-6.1.19-1.x86_64

[OM Cooker] Access to a powerful AArch64 box

Hi, I got us access to a relatively powerful AArch64 box in the Linaro lab (and yes, we have full root access). For now, we have the machine reserved for our use until July 14, but we can extend that if we still don't have our own hardware by then. Anyone who wants an account, please send me

Re: [OM Cooker] clang/gcc C++ ABI mismatch?

On 2015-05-10 10:38, Crispin Boylan wrote: Hi it looks like gcc cant link C++ programs built with clang and vice versa, possibly clang is using the old ABI, whilst gcc is using the CXX11 one introduced in 5.1? Is it possible that cppunit was simply built before the new libstdc++ was in?

Re: [OM Cooker] Sailfish Alliance? Also some plans and thoughts of where to go in future direction..

On 2015-06-24 16:07, Tomasz Gajc wrote: Per what are the real benefits of moving back to rpm.org? Does this needs some extra work on perl-URPM, urpmi, mock-urpm and various ABF subsystems ? I think there's both benefits (esp. that it's the same thing opensuse and the likes use, so zypper

[OM Cooker] libressl

Hi, there hasn't been much talk about replacing openssl with libressl on the list or IRC -- so I've gone ahead and packaged libressl for testing (in a way that the libressl packages replace openssl): https://abf.io/openmandriva/libressl I've not added it to any of our trees yet. So far it

Re: [OM Cooker] Plasma 5

On 2015-08-20 18:42, Tomasz Gajc wrote: Hi, looks like Plasma 5.4 is going to be tagged as LTD version by upstream. This means we should focus and updating our plasma packages just after release at end of this month. Looking forward for help with updating KDE Apps 15.08 which has been

Re: [OM Cooker] Thunderbird won't install in Cooker.

Probably just needs a rebuild, libicuuc has moved on to .so.55 ttyl bero On 2015-06-26 13:06, Ben Bullard wrote: In Cooker missing dependency for Thunderbird: A requested package cannot be installed: thunderbird-31.7.0-1-omv2015.0.x86_64 (due to unsatisfied libicuuc.so.54()(64bit)) -- Ben

Re: [OM Cooker] Program suggestion , eat tha' shashlik

Hi, I've had a look at it too -- the big problem with it right now is that it can't be built on 64 bit boxes because it relies on parts of Android 4.4.x, which aren't compatible with 64-bit (That support was added in 5.0). When I have some time I'll look into updating those components to

Re: [OM Cooker] Switch to pkgconf

On 2015-07-27 23:52, Tomasz Gajc wrote: Well this looks quite interesting. Bero have you noticed any speed ups? Not really, since pkgconf/pkg-config is called only a couple of times while running configure or cmake, even if there was a 1000% speedup it wouldn't matter much in total build

Re: [OM Cooker] libressl

On 2015-08-12 00:56, Robert Xu wrote: Ooh - I'll play around with it. But please don't add it to Cooker trees until we're done with 2015.0, pleas. While you definitely have a point there, I have to disagree because of ABI stability -- we're stuck with whatever we choose for the

[OM Cooker] Does anyone like the info tool?

Hi, just wondering if anyone actually likes the info tool (just had a conversation with a BSD guy who said info is the worst part of Linux -- can't disagree much there) -- and if everyone hates it, if we should do anything about it. IMO pinfo makes it a lot more bearable than the regular

Re: [OM Cooker] Switch to pkgconf

I've been using it on my box for 5 days now -- no problems whatsoever. As far as I'm concerned, let's dump pkgconfig... ttyl bero On 2015-07-22 11:15, Tomasz Gajc wrote: 2015-07-21 21:41 GMT+02:00 Jeffrey Johnson n3...@me.com: Add the pkg-conf package please as time permits.

[OM Cooker] How to fix linker errors in the mass build

Hi, there's quite a few failures in the mass build with ld errors, looking something like this: /usr/bin/ld: error: ctl.o:1:3: invalid character /usr/bin/ld: error: ctl.o:1:3: syntax error, unexpected $end /usr/bin/ld: error: ctl.o: not an object or archive The problem here is that the *.o

Re: [OM Cooker] LLVM syntax error, unexpected $end

On 2015-07-22 12:44, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: Hi, On 2015-07-21 23:57, Tomasz Paweł Gajc wrote: With current mass rebuild i see quite a lot of packages failing with errors like below: make[2]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/libsvg-cairo-0.1.6/src' /usr/bin/ld: error: .libs

Re: [OM Cooker] LLVM syntax error, unexpected $end

Hi, On 2015-07-21 23:57, Tomasz Paweł Gajc wrote: With current mass rebuild i see quite a lot of packages failing with errors like below: make[2]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/libsvg-cairo-0.1.6/src' /usr/bin/ld: error: .libs/svg_cairo.o:1:3: invalid character This means that

Re: [OM Cooker] abf abf-downloads

On 2015-11-09 14:28, Alexander Khryukin wrote: http://abf-downloads.openmandriva.org/ [1] http://abf.openmandriva.org/ [2] both working but abf.openmandriva still on heavy development Thanks, that's GREAT news! seems to be pretty fast too. I tried to sign up and got an error though...

Re: [OM Cooker] [om-council] Paris facts

On 2015-11-14 08:06, rugyada wrote: I'm disconcerted this morning reading about Paris attacks. My heart goes close to our French friends. Same here. The fact that I don't buy into the explanation the news media are parroting (we all know the result of this will be increased support for

Re: [OM Cooker] kdelibs does not compile on i586

Has anyone tried changing the compiler for qt4? ttyl bero On 2015-07-09 15:55, Tomasz Gajc wrote: I've created a bug for this issue https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1280 [1] 2015-07-09 12:33 GMT+02:00 Crispin Boylan c...@beebgames.com: so you can see in

Re: [OM Cooker] Cannot build systemd

Hi, this is either a really messed up Makefile or libtool acting up badly... It uses clang to build stuff, and then runs gcc-ar instead of plain ar or llvm-ar. gcc-ar has no understanding of clang LTO bytecode. Possible fixes: - (best) Fix the Makefiles or libtool to not use gcc-ar -

Re: [OM Cooker] EFI secure boot

Seems to be some missing build dependency (something that is dlopened by opensc-pkcs11.so?) -- it builds fine locally here... Btw, what use is signing this stuff? I don't presume we have access to a generally accepted signing key? ttyl bero On 2015-09-11 11:11, Tomasz Gajc wrote: >

Re: [OM Cooker] sddm coredump

Might be a locale issue -- maybe something is "too" aware of different languages with different rules. Both variants work for me with LANG=C -- Luca is probably using it_IT.utf-8? ttyl bero On 2015-12-07 14:30, Colin Close wrote: Luca, Well Luca I can only go by the evidence the same the

Re: [OM Cooker] Cooker: Oh no plasma.desktop is FUBAR

Hi, I've just looked at it a bit. There seems to be some problem with kscreen (which happens to be used by both LXQt and Plasma) -- if I launch plasmashell, I get errors about nothing providing org.kde.KScreen. If I launch /usr/lib64/libexec/kf5/kscreen_backend_launcher manually and then

Re: [OM Cooker] Noto fonts

Hi, we should definitely package them -- not so sure about switching the default (I guess a lot of KDE is designed with Oxygen fonts in mind - using something else may add unwanted wrapping or stuff like that). ttyl bero On 2016-01-07 21:35, Tomasz Paweł Gajc wrote: Hi, what do you think

Re: [OM Cooker] Updating x11 stack for 2014.x

On 2015-11-18 13:52, Tomasz Gajc wrote: Hi, i'd like to raise the topic of updating x11 stack for 2014.x. Hi, fully agreed... For essentially the same reasons, I think we should move to x11-server 1.18.0 for the 3 release (and also push that to 2014.x, then we have consistency and won't

Re: [OM Cooker] Qt 5.6.1

On 2016-06-08 19:40, Tomasz Paweł Gajc wrote: Hi, Qt 5.6.1 got released yesterday. Would be nice to get it on 3.0 ? WDYT ? I'm updating Cooker -- let's see how well it does there before deciding about 3.0 ttyl bero ___ OM-Cooker mailing list

Re: [OM Cooker] Qt 5.6.1

On 2016-06-08 23:06, Colin Close wrote: On Wednesday, 8 June 2016 19:40:57 BST Tomasz Paweł Gajc wrote: Hi, Qt 5.6.1 got released yesterday. Would be nice to get it on 3.0 ? WDYT ? I hope you are making a joke :) This just came in through the kde-distro-packager ML: """ I've updated

Re: [OM Cooker] is build 258 for QA Beta tests?

On 2016-06-04 13:59, luca pedrielli wrote: I was waiting for a beta to test this weekend, as from latest TC. I've probably misunderstood. No, still expected to happen. Just got to finish a couple of things. ttyl bero ___ OM-Cooker mailing list

Re: [OM Cooker] any release ?

On 2016-06-13 13:47, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: On 2016-06-13 13:42, Alexander Stefanov-Khryukin wrote: I still can't install or just run any iso. Well, quality looks not acceptable now. https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1706 That's the one I'm concerned about as well

Re: [OM Cooker] any release ?

On 2016-06-13 13:42, Alexander Stefanov-Khryukin wrote: I still can't install or just run any iso. Well, quality looks not acceptable now. https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1706 That's the one I'm concerned about as well - not reproducable here, on my boxes (including one with

Re: [OM Cooker] Odd mix of 32-bit and 64-bit packages in freshly installed chroots

-05-30 14:44 GMT+02:00 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <b...@lindev.ch>: Hi, I just tried to set up a new cooker chroot -- oddly, I ended up with a number of i586 packages (e.g. m4, clang) instead of their x86_64 equivalents. Looks like urpmi unconditionally prefers the one with a newer version/r

[OM Cooker] libpci update breaks the ABI slightly

Hi, after the libpci update, chromium-browser-dev doesn't start anymore because pci_init with symbol revision LIBPCI_3.0 is no longer defined -- I've fixed it, but probably we should run a mass build of anything that uses libpci to be sure it's not breaking anything else. I'll start the

Re: [OM Cooker] Are we a Go for release of Beta2?

On 2016-06-17 18:37, Ben Bullard wrote: Is .iso # 342 sufficiently tested and OK for a release for Beta2? om-welcome isn't working. We have a "fix", but are still looking at a proper solution (one that doesn't involve pulling in the whole python 2 stack as dependencies). Unfortunately my

Re: [OM Cooker] [om-qa] Are we a Go for release of Beta2?

On 2016-06-17 23:28, rugyada wrote: $ rpm -qa|grep oma-welcome oma-welcome-2.0-1-omv2015.0.x86_64 Working. Thanks for the confirmation -- new iso is already building too. ttyl bero ___ OM-Cooker mailing list OM-Cooker@ml.openmandriva.org

Re: [OM Cooker] In 3.0 possible dependency issue with VirtualBox?

Hi, On 2016-06-25 20:59, Ben Bullard wrote: found package(s): virtualbox-5.0.22-1-omv2015.0.x86_64 virtualbox-5.0.20-1-omv2015.0.x86_64 Minor problem there: looks like abf is "forgetting" once again to remove old versions. But that doesn't matter, urpmi selects 5.0.22 anyway. Is this

Re: [OM Cooker] systemd is broken !

On 2016-02-06 11:56, Tomasz Paweł Gajc wrote: Hi, looks like some package after 2016-01-28 broked systemd or systemd-228-5 is miscompilled (LLVM issue?) I doubt it, llvm gets pretty heavy testing... But let's try by just rebuilding systemd with CC=gcc, can't hurt. What error do we get

Re: [OM Cooker] Rebuilds for libwep

Hi, looking... Easiest workaround is probably -fuse-ld=bfd, given this is gold throwing an assertion. ttyl bero On 2016-02-24 13:31, Tomasz Gajc wrote: > Hi, > > any ideas how to fix this ? > http://abf.openmandriva.org/build_lists/2927 > > Couple of packages needs a rebuild after

Re: [OM Cooker] Blockers for Lx 3 BETA release

On 2016-02-29 00:49, Tomasz Paweł Gajc wrote: Hi, i've made a short list of blockers for BETA release: 1. Broken dependencies - i586 -> 78 x86_64 -> 84 You can see them by installing urpm-repoclosure and running this command urpm-repoclosure

Re: [OM Cooker] Why does Calamares make user's full name like this?

On 2016-02-24 22:10, Ben Bullard wrote: Calamares makes users full name followed by 4 commas like this from '/etc/passwd': ben79:x:1001:1006:Ben Bullard:/home/ben79:/bin/bash I wonder why. Convention in some companies (and probably some distributions too) Name,Job

Re: [OM Cooker] Meeting tomorrow, Jan 20th

On 2016-01-19 22:18, Kate Lebedeff wrote: https://project.openmandriva.org/meetings/51 Probably can't make it because I'm at Android Bootcamp - from where I stand, Cooker is essentially ready for a pre-beta release for QA. I haven't run into serious issues without known workarounds for a

Re: [OM Cooker] Maybe this is why all the XCB errors in journal?

I think the XCB errors are unrelated. My cooker box works almost perfectly, just a few occasional glitches here and there after I disabled screen locking, but I'm getting a number of XCB errors in the log too. They seem to be fairly harmless warnings. As for why they don't appear in other

Re: [OM Cooker] Regarding bug # 1482

afford to replace)? Or > am out of luck regarding wanting to use OM Lx 3? If there is something I can > do I'd do it but I don't know what to do? > > Ben Bullard > ben79 > > OpenMandriva-QA Team > > On 01/19/2016 08:12 PM, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: On

Re: [OM Cooker] abf.openmandriva.org is ready

ady on abf-downloads.openmandriva.org). ttyl bero On 2016-02-15 22:13, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: > Hi, > > I agree -- probably abf.openmandriva.org will already give us better > reliability. Given git on abf.io is down anyway, this sounds like a perfect > time. We just need to make su

Re: [OM Cooker] llvm-3.8.0 is broken

Hi, looks like they switched the defaults to not building compiler-rt at the last second (worked locally because I have another compiler-rt build floating around). Currently testing a fix. ttyl bero On 2016-03-09 23:15, Tomasz Paweł Gajc wrote: > I can't build anything on x86_64 after

Re: [OM Cooker] rpm-5.4.16 snapshot

Hi, this looks interesting. One question: "3) (recommended) rpm-5.4.16 uses db-6.1.23 (not 6.1.26)" Did you have any particular problems with 6.1.26? From the changelog, it looks like 6.1.26 is a bugfix release more than anything else.

Re: [OM Cooker] Plasma 5.6 got released

Hi, let's update Qt first, Qt 5.6 goes with it (and Plasma will likely enable extra stuff when it sees Qt 5.6)... ttyl bero On 2016-03-22 23:33, Tomasz Paweł Gajc wrote: Hi, good news everyone. Plasma 5.6 has been released on time. Currently i'm updating our Plasma. Please be patient. New

Re: [OM Cooker] Packages that needs fixing

On 2016-03-20 13:58, Tomasz Paweł Gajc wrote: Hi, i've rebuild all old (2015 and older) packages that are pulled on ISO. Only 85 packages needs to be fixed. https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/cooker/mass_builds/38/failed_builds_list.txt ID: 33250; PROJECT_NAME: boost; ARCH: x86_64

Re: [OM Cooker] efibootmgr: Could not delete boot variable: No space left on device

On 2016-03-25 19:24, Ben Bullard wrote: > Any idea how to permanently fix this. It keeps reoccurring. Looks like a crappy BIOS... https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=201970 Try clearing CMOS or deleting unused entries. ttyl bero___

[OM Cooker] [kernel patch] E2400 support

Hi Nicco, please add the attached patch to the next kernel - it makes the E2400 network chip found in quite a few recent notebooks work. thanks bero--- 4.1.18-nicco1/patches/add-E2400-to-alx.patch.omv~ 2016-03-03 16:25:29.251815507 +0100 +++ 4.1.18-nicco1/patches/add-E2400-to-alx.patch

[OM Cooker] Qupzilla

Hi, I've just updated Qupzilla to a version that makes use of QtWebEngine rather than QtWebKit, goes better with Qt 5.6. I've been using it all afternoon and I'm impressed, for the first time everything in qupzilla works, even HTML5 videos and even the Flash plugin for those who still need

Re: [OM Cooker] Any idea when Cooker --auto-update will work again?

On 2016-04-26 22:57, Ben Bullard wrote: I would like to help Bero or you building rpms. Thanks, that's great news, we can always use more people in that area. How do I do this? Where should I start on this? I think people have already posted ABF documentation - do you know how to write

Re: [OM Cooker] F2FS support

Thanks, that's great news! I'll definitely give it a try the next time I reinstall my box (and this actually got me wanting to reinstall my main box when we have the next beta iso...) ttyl bero On 2016-04-26 22:48, Tomasz Paweł Gajc wrote: Hi, i've decided to break my demotivation for a

Re: [OM Cooker] fork to lx3

Hi, please wait for another day or so, we're in the middle of the KDE Applications 16.04 build. The tree will be in a much better shape for forking when that's finished. ttyl bero On 2016-04-25 02:20, Alexander Stefanov-Khryukin wrote: > How about to fork current master to lx3 ? >

Re: [OM Cooker] LLVM/clang 3.7 does not build on 2014.x

ze of array 'assertion_failed__36' is negative > typedef char IMPL_PASTE(assertion_failed_##_, line)[2*(int)(pred)-1] > https://abf.openmandriva.org/build_lists/58082 > > Can you please help ? > > 2016-05-09 22:51 GMT+02:00 Tomasz Paweł Gajc <tpg...@gmail.com>: > Dnia poniedział

Re: [OM Cooker] libarchive and cooker broken state

On 2016-05-08 18:58, Alexander Stefanov-Khryukin wrote: Fix landed https://github.com/OpenMandrivaAssociation/rpm/commit/02ffa248343b28c70542a9df7eb8937e456409fd Well, now is no reason to wait till 22.00 CET We preparing to fork right now. If you have something against, is last chance to say.

Re: [OM Cooker] Did we ever split repositories?

Hi, almost done... Just need a few rebuilds to catch up with the new poppler and package the bits of kapps 16.04 that didn't exist before, there's a few new apps. ttyl bero On 2016-05-07 12:49, Alexander Stefanov-Khryukin wrote: > Hi guys, i was busy 4 past days and don't know current kf5

Re: [OM Cooker] LLVM/clang 3.7 does not build on 2014.x

Hi, why bother with 3.6 or 3.7 when we know from cooker that 3.8 works (and we also know the exact dependencies)? Wouldn't it be a better idea to backport isl and llvm from cooker instead of adding yet another version to maintain? ttyl bero On 2016-05-09 21:51, Tomasz Paweł Gajc wrote:

Re: [OM Cooker] gnupg issues

On 2016-07-13 23:57, Tomasz Paweł Gajc wrote: does anyone have issues with ssh or gpg with 3.0 ? Not the way I use them (but I don't use gpg-agent...) Typing pinentry-qt in konsole does not shiw any window, just this: [tpg@lazur ~]$ pinentry-qt OK Pleased to meet you That's expected.

[OM Cooker] Fwd: Live image for Plasma 5.7 release

Looks like an opportunity if we can get cooker ready for a "preview what's next" type live image release... Original Message Subject: Live image for Plasma 5.7 release Date: 2016-06-27 14:12 From: Martin Graesslin To: distributi...@kde.org Cc:

Re: [OM Cooker] ATI video Cards

On 2016-07-05 22:02, Chris Tanner wrote: Hello all, I now have my 8 year old PC running OMV 3.0 successfully. I replaced the old NVIDIA card with an ATI(AMD) HD6450 and things appear to be working well but: When I run XFDrak, it does not suggest that I install the proprietary driver (fglrx I

Re: [OM Cooker] Plasma 5.9.0 update

Hi, 5.8.0 works perfectly on X11, haven't come across a single problem with it in the couple of months since we updated cooker. There is a big problem with 5.8.0 and wayland though: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-58423 So the question becomes whether or not we care about Plasma on

[OM Cooker] WARNING: Some Cooker breakage ahead

Hi, I'm switching libstdc++ in cooker over to the "new" ABI that has been around (but disabled in OMLx) since gcc 5.1. We've disabled this so far because clang 3.x didn't support it -- but with clang 4.0, it's supported and we can benefit from some changes in newer libstdc++ versions that need

Re: [OM Cooker] ?==?utf-8?q? [OM?==?utf-8?q? Cooker] WARNING: Some Cooker breakage ahead

er binary compatibility with other distros. Pretty much all of them have moved to the new ABI when gcc 5.1 came out because they don't have to care about clang. ttyl bero > 08.02.2017 9:04 PM "Bernhard Rosenkraenzer" <b...@lindev.ch> napisał(a): > > > Hi, > > I'm swi

Re: [OM Cooker] Regarding Rolling Releases

On 2016-09-06 21:17, Tomasz Paweł Gajc wrote: Dnia wtorek, 6 września 2016 11:11:36 CEST Robert Xu pisze: On 6 September 2016 at 10:58, Tomasz Paweł Gajc wrote: > Only one hour ? Thats quite uncomprable given that idea is almost year > old... And was never really discussed

Re: [OM Cooker] Regarding Rolling Releases

Hi, this is e.g. when we'll move from KDE 5.x to 6.x -- if we push one package at a time, the "stable" repository will go insane for a bit with the plasma-desktop's requirements not matching the libraries. We need a way to move the whole set of packages that make up KDE 6.0 to stable at the

Re: [OM Cooker] Something in main-testing appears to be broken.

Hi, yes, this is expected -- mesa needs a rebuild with the updated llvm (and llvm hasn't finished building on armv7hl yet, so the mesa build can't be started). The mesa and llvm updates need to be pushed at the same time. ttyl bero On 2016-09-08 16:12, Ben Bullard wrote: > All packages

Re: [OM Cooker] Something in main-testing appears to be broken.

On 2016-09-08 23:11, Raphaël Jadot wrote: Any eta for fix btw? I tried the update but with missing drivers I can't start X11 anymore :) llvm for armv7hl still hasn't finished building https://abf.openmandriva.org/build_lists/79267 It'll take a few more hours. ttyl bero

Re: [OM Cooker] Something in main-testing appears to be broken.

Should be fixed now on anything except armv7hl (mesa still building there) ttyl bero On 2016-09-09 08:05, Raphaël Jadot wrote: > Ok thanks Bero. > > -- > Sent from Yandex.Mail for mobile > > 09.09.2016, 00:58, "Bernhard Rosenkraenzer" <b...@lindev.ch>:

Re: [OM Cooker] ?==?utf-8?q? [OM?==?utf-8?q? Cooker] avoid kernel 4.8

I've been running cooker's 4.8.1 for around 20 hours, seems to pass at least basic stress tests. ttyl bero On Sunday, October 09, 2016 01:01 CEST, Tomasz Paweł Gajc wrote:  Dnia środa, 5 października 2016 12:52:29 CEST Robert Xu pisze: > currently experiencing hard crashes

Re: [OM Cooker] Distrowatch Reviewed Lx 3

The point he makes about duplicated apps is actually correct -- we should have released separate Plasma and LXQt isos, there's usually no point in having several desktops on the same box anyway (unless there's multiple people with different preferences using the same box). Let's do that next

Re: [OM Cooker] Distrowatch Reviewed Lx 3

On 2016-09-19 14:45, Tomasz Gajc wrote: About duplicated apps, it is still matter of manpower, as upstream forgot to add OnlyShowIn=LXQt in desktop files. I'm not sure we want to add OnlyShowIn=LXQt there -- e.g. some people may prefer Qupzilla or qterminal even in Plasma because they're

Re: [OM Cooker] Hype form LLVM/clang

On 2016-08-16 19:07, Tomasz Paweł Gajc wrote: Can we get some hype from LLVM/clang community ? Hi, I got Renato (from the LLVM/clang team) to share a G+ post about OMLx -- but that's all I got so far. ttyl bero ___ OM-Cooker mailing list

Re: [OM Cooker] Naming of pkgconfig *.pc files

On 2016-08-26 18:30, Colin Close wrote: Hi Recently I came across an issue with pkgconfig file naming and I would appreciate some advice. I recently added a BuildRequires pkgconfig(librsvg) line to a spec file I am working on. When I ran the build the librsvg package was not found. Further

Re: [OM Cooker] Switch to pkgconf

ing pkgconf and will do some further build tests > before i'll release it to repository. > > 2016-08-23 15:02 GMT+02:00 Alexander Stefanov-Khryukin <nobodyd...@gmail.com>: > > +1 for this > > 2016-08-23 15:40 GMT+03:00 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <b...@lindev.ch>: &

Re: [OM Cooker] Switch to pkgconf

On 2016-08-23 14:25, Tomasz Gajc wrote: Hi, looks like it is a good time to switch to pkgconf and replace ancient pkg-config, right ? Right, now would be the perfect time... We should definitely do it. What are the benefits ? Barely none for luser :) In theory it should have a positive

Re: [OM Cooker] ?==?utf-8?q? [OM?==?utf-8?q? Cooker] Testing updates

On Monday, October 03, 2016 22:45 CEST, Chris Tanner wrote:  I just updated my PC and received from the testing repository a couple of libraries for nettle. I have no idea what nettle is and how to properly test it.It's a cryptographic library.

Re: [OM Cooker] ?==?utf-8?q? [OM?==?utf-8?q? Cooker] Multi-distro, universal packages

Hi, while those packaging systems do serve a purpose (make it as easy as possible for a software maker to package something that will hopefully work everywhere), they're not suitable as the primary packaging format of a distribution. Essentially, what they do is bundle all the shared libraries

Re: [OM Cooker] ?==?utf-8?q? [OM?==?utf-8?q? Cooker] Announcement draft and TC today

Hi, I'll be around... ttyl bero On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 09:52 CET, Kate Lebedeff wrote:  TPG, Bero, are you heading the TC today? Please confirm or decline for others to know:) Dear all Here is the announcement we had for the release, open for all edits I

Re: [OM Cooker] ?==?utf-8?q? [OM?==?utf-8?q? Cooker] Use modesetting driver instead of intel and nouveau

Hi, the modesetting driver works for me -- but it seems to drive the CPU usage up compared to the intel driver, so probably this wouldn't be good for battery life. I haven't seen any lockups with either intel or modesetting. I'd be surprised if it fixed the nouveau problems because they seem to

Re: [OM Cooker] ?==?utf-8?q? [OM?==?utf-8?q? Cooker] One users reasons for using i586 on 64 bit hardware.

Hi, I've been meaning for a while to do a new build, using X32 ABI as well as replacing glibc with musl and libstdc++ with libc++ (the only big reason not to replace those 2 is binary compatibility with other distributions -- which doesn't exist in X32 ABI anyway, given only very few distros

Re: [OM Cooker] ?==?utf-8?q? [OM?==?utf-8?q? Cooker] FYI

Hi, we already released an updated kernel that fixes this. Not super relevant because likely nothing uses HDLC anymore (and you can't modprobe n_hdlc unless you're root), but you never know... ttyl bero On Thursday, March 23, 2017 13:58 CET, Jean-Claude Vanier wrote:

Re: [OM Cooker] ?==?utf-8?q? [OM?==?utf-8?q? Cooker] python update to 3.5.x for 3.0

On Sunday, May 07, 2017 20:10 CEST, Tomasz Gajc wrote: > Hi, > > looks like kajongg (part of kapps) needs python 3.5.x version. while onlu > 3.4 is available on 3.0 tree. > WDYT to update python to 3.5.x version ? IMO we shouldn't be updating to a version that's already

Re: [OM Cooker] ?==?utf-8?q? [OM?==?utf-8?q? Cooker] Back to 3.02 release

Hi, no, kde-l10n is obsolete now, translations are provided in the package of the application they belong to (e.g. konsole translations are in the konsole package, dolphin translations are in the dolphin package). ttyl bero On Tuesday, May 09, 2017 02:01 CEST, rugyada