P
Objet : Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal
Colleagues,
We are in a transition stage in ONAP and not target state.
ONAP is not widely or mildly deployed yet by most operators. If operators do
not commit and are engaged in the technical decision making, then
this will impact the business
c@lists.onap.org" <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal
I second Mazin's comment on max 1 representative per company, given the size of
ONAP and variety of ONAP participants.
I also second Frank's and Rajesh's comment on extending the TSC size
, April 5, 2018 7:59 AM
To: Christopher Donley (Chris) <christopher.don...@huawei.com>; Haiby, Ranny
(Nokia - US/San Jose) <ranny.ha...@nokia.com>; onap-tsc@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal
Chris,
Given that the TSC is a leadership body, I think that a
@linuxfoundation.org>>;
onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal
Chris,
I completely agree with your point of having the TSC represent the needs of the
community. However, I think I see the term "commun
don...@huawei.com>; Kenny Paul
<kp...@linuxfoundation.org>; Phil Robb <pr...@linuxfoundation.org>;
onap-tsc@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal
Chris,
I completely agree with your point of having the TSC represent the needs of the
community. Howe
:20 AM
To: Kenny Paul; Phil Robb; onap-tsc@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal
Kenny,
I think that's the wrong way to frame this. I don't object to any company being
represented on the TSC, but I think we need to look at the needs of the
community and what leadership struct
(Chris)
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 8:24 PM
To: Kenny Paul <kp...@linuxfoundation.org>; Phil Robb
<pr...@linuxfoundation.org>; onap-tsc@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal
Kenny,
I think that's the wrong way to frame this. I don't object to any c
Chris)" <christopher.don...@huawei.com>
Date: Friday, April 20, 2018 at 10:24 AM
To: Kenny Paul <kp...@linuxfoundation.org>, Phil Robb
<pr...@linuxfoundation.org>, "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org" <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal
Kenn
t;onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>"
<onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal
Hi TSC Members,
I am attempting to get my head around a couple aspects of the discussion. I
think that there are a few t
Hi TSC Members,
I am attempting to get my head around a couple aspects of the discussion. I
think that there are a few things we can knock down in advance of next week,
which is all I am trying to accomplish here.
NOTE- THESE ARE NOT VOTES, but if there are objections or concerns, let's
the
discussions we had. This particular topic should be discussed abd raised for
voting separately, I believe.
Best regards, Alla
Original Message
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal
From: "Gadiyar, Rajesh" <rajesh.gadi...@intel.com>
Date: Apr
k Brockners
(fbrockne)" <fbroc...@cisco.com>
Date: Thursday, April 19, 2018 at 7:42 AM
To: Phil Robb <pr...@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org" <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal
Hi Phil,
thanks for the clarif
of options covered.
Thanks, Frank
From: Phil Robb <pr...@linuxfoundation.org>
Sent: Donnerstag, 19. April 2018 16:21
To: Frank Brockners (fbrockne) <fbroc...@cisco.com>
Cc: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal
Hi Frank.
The concern I'm tryin
>,
"onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>"
<onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal
Hello ONAP TSC:
I would like to keep the discussion moving regarding how and when we
..@lists.onap.org <onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org> *On
> Behalf Of *Phil Robb
> *Sent:* Mittwoch, 18. April 2018 01:25
> *To:* onap-tsc@lists.onap.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal
>
>
>
> Hello ONAP TSC Members:
>
>
>
> T
· TSC size: 30
Thoughts?
Thanks, Frank
From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org <onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org> On
Behalf Of Phil Robb
Sent: Mittwoch, 18. April 2018 01:25
To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal
Hello ONAP TSC Members:
The
ed under wiki. People who make presentations
>>> are uploading their slides or adding wiki pages, which can be measured
>>> using Bitergia.
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>> From: "Vul, Alex" <alex....@intel.com>
>>>
ap.org" <
>> onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>
>>
>> Subject: RE: TSC Composition Proposal
>>
>> Chris,
>>
>>
>>
>> Given that the TSC is a leadership body, I think that architectural
>> subject matter expertise and industry experience should cou
com>, "Haiby, Ranny (Nokia - US/San
> Jose)" <ranny.ha...@nokia.com>, "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org" <
> onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>
>
> Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal
>
> Hello ONAP TSC:
>
> I would like to keep the discussion mo
...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>
[mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Donley (Chris)
Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2018 6:23 AM
To: Haiby, Ranny (Nokia - US/San Jose)
<ranny.ha...@nokia.com<mailto:ranny.ha...@nokia.com>>;
ona
t; Alex Vul
>
> Intel Corporation
>
>
>
> *From:* onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-bounces@
> lists.onap.org <onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>] *On Behalf Of *Christopher
> Donley (Chris)
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 5, 2018 6:23 AM
> *To:* Haiby, Rann
nap.org>"
<onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal
Thanks, Chris & Steve for the proposal. A couple quick comments/clarifications:
- Should Eligible Voter Criteria also be Eligible TSC Candidat
.
From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>
<onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>> On
Behalf Of Christopher Donley (Chris)
Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 1:58 PM
To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap
E (MAZIN E) <ma...@research.att.com>; Christopher Donley
(Chris) <christopher.don...@huawei.com>
Cc: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal
Thank You Mazin
I fully understand and support your concern to have 50% of Telecom Operators in
the TSC,
10
...@lists.onap.org]
De la part de GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E)
Envoyé : jeudi 5 avril 2018 00:18
À : Christopher Donley (Chris)
Cc : onap-tsc@lists.onap.org
Objet : Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal
Chris, Steve,
Thanks for drafting a proposal together. Let me share some thoughts following
Of Haiby, Ranny (Nokia - US/San Jose)
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2018 11:47 PM
To: Christopher Donley (Chris) <christopher.don...@huawei.com>;
onap-tsc@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal
Chris and Steve,
Thanks for the time and effort put into this proposal.
One thin
Chris, Steve,
Thanks for drafting a proposal together. Let me share some thoughts following
the board meeting last week.
1. A number of board members (vendors, suppliers and operators) are concerned
that we are changing the TSC too soon at this early stage of ONAP.
Although not everyone voted
Christopher Donley (Chris)" <christopher.don...@huawei.com>,
"onap-tsc@lists.onap.org" <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>
Date: 04/04/2018 04:47 PM
Subject:Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal
Sent by:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org
Chris and Steve,
T
org> On
Behalf Of Christopher Donley (Chris)
Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 1:58 PM
To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-tsc] TSC Composition Proposal
Dear TSC,
Steve Terrill and I have put together a proposal to transition the TSC to its
“steady state” by June 30, as required in th
29 matches
Mail list logo
