I think this is all very interesting.
I want to point out that any situation where code is downloaded for execution
under the user's privileges while running Apache OpenOffice is an avenue for
attack by injection of malicious code and also data mining the user account.
The authentication of
for our documents
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
TJ,
I am not entirely comfortable having auth...@documentation.openoffice.org
(the correct list), and maybe the other forward to a non-Apache location,
though I think it would be valuable
And then there's contributor as a term of art in The Apache Way. The
progression is contributor to committer. Apparently one can contribute by
participating in the Apache nomenclature.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, November 18,
I thought it was clear that the vote was for Trademark and Branding,
specifically with regard to the product. As I recall, the project name was
explicitly excluded.
I don't have any objection to the project being Apache OpenOffice too, I just
don't think that was in the scope of the ballot.
+1 on podling pages.
Good catch.
I think maybe contributing.openoffice.org should go away. If it redirects, it
should be to an i.a.o page, but nuking it might be best of all.
The places where there are links to it need to be renamed for Contributing to
Apache OpenOffice, unless it is
I welcome anyone who is willing to share the PITA burden concerning licensing,
IP, terms-of-use, etc.
With regard to the NOTICE file. In a binary release, yes. If the work is
being embedded somehow and/or installed in some manner, the NOTICE that is
included in the executable install
configuration management
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I think this is all very interesting.
I want to point out that any situation where code is downloaded for execution
under the user's privileges while running Apache OpenOffice is an avenue
Subject: Re: Apache Licensed Fonts (was Re: Font related questions)
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I welcome anyone who is willing to share the PITA burden concerning
licensing, IP, terms-of-use, etc.
With regard to the NOTICE file. In a binary
Rob,
I would add
3) What makes it easy for an adopter of a binary release to know what license
permissions and license conditions and restrictions apply to their use of the
artifact.
I agree about the confusion downstream. It also matters how diligent
downstream producers are in handling of
+1 on addition of Education
-Original Message-
From: eric b [mailto:eric.bach...@free.fr]
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 12:38
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [WWW][Policy] Participate! - Rewriting contributing.openoffice.org
Hi,
Le 18 nov. 11 à 20:40, Dave Fisher a
[mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 12:54
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Licensed Fonts (was Re: Font related questions)
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Rob,
I would add
3) What makes it easy
with
all participants on ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org without
becoming a committer You can also be invited to become
a committer at a later time upon recognition of your
contributions to the project.
- for the Apache OpenOffice.org PPMC
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E
That was not my intention, Rob. I had no idea there was discussion at
http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=49t=45224.
All I provided was a notice.
My message was to advise Forum readers, especially the volunteers of the fact
that the [VOTE] was happening here.
I am
Both Stefan and Martin have iCLAs on file. Both signed up on the Incubator
Proposal as Initial Committers. Stefan completed the process to be established
as a committer. He is also eligible to be on the PPMC.
Communication and administrative delays, sometimes mine, often arise in the
Good catch. There is no such address at the moment. Since @*.openoffice.org
lists and e-mail forwardings will cease operation in the near future, some
special action will be needed.
I am taking the liberty of cross-posting this reply to ooo-dev so that it is
noticed among the mitigation
At risk of creating a self-fulfilling prophecy about the length of this thread,
I want to offer a mild disagreement.
Here, there is pontification about a discussion that wasn't even held here.
The interpretations have no ground.
It might be interesting to have the discussion where the
I had thought that category X artifacts needed to accomplish a build would be
excluded from the release but identified as prerequisites for the build. They
would never be distributed in the Apache OpenOffice release. (I am becoming
rapidly accustomed to using that name.)
Some become
Good point, Dave.
I think one important consideration around this Opt-in provisions is also
whether the download is something that is authenticated in some manner or is at
the user's risk. I don't quite know how that gets dealt with. It may be that
some arrangements for acquiring extensions
+1 on not downloading anything without consent.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 12:11
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Draft IP Review Plan for OpenOffice
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Dave Fisher
For the record, if one posts to ooo-dev without subscribing, there is no way to
know that posting succeeded, without looking on the archive. There is also no
way to see replies directly, unless other posters realize that the poster is
not subscribed and provide a direct CC:.
Although
I think Dan's proposal to change to an independent ODFAuthors feedback address
is appropriate.
Meanwhile, where there are copies that can't be modified, it seems desirable
to see if a special arrangement can be made for feedback@
documentation.openoffice.org. I suspect there might be a
services and lists can now
be found.That would catch this case as well as any others.
-Rob
Regards,
Dave
On Nov 17, 2011, at 5:42 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I think Dan's proposal to change to an independent ODFAuthors feedback
address
is appropriate.
Meanwhile, where there are copies
-11-18T24:00Z, the Initial
Committer status will have expired.
- Dennis
for the Apache OOo PPMC
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 10:11
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: 2011-10-12 PPMC Status: Bringing
orcmid comments=in-line /
-Original Message-
From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 19:56
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org
Subject: Re: Blog Draft: OpenOffice.org Migration -- The
the Preview URL
from that interface.)
If I don't figure this out before the day ends (UTC-0800), I will put the text
of the post into an ooo-dev message.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 20:38
To: ooo
there is a way to aggregate
personal blogs at Apache Planet). There is a protocol about having posts be
where they can be reviewed.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 12:48
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
.
- Dennis E. Hamilton
tools for document interoperability, http://nfoWorks.org/
dennis.hamil...@acm.org gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid
-Original Message-
From: Zhe Liu [mailto:liu...@cn.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 18:29
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
+1
-Original Message-
From: Gianluca Turconi [mailto:pub...@letturefantastiche.com]
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 00:32
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: GPL'd dictionaries (was Re: ftp.services.openoffice.org?)
In data 13 novembre 2011 alle ore 18:39:34, Andrea Pescetti
are, any longer.)
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 13:30
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: 'Rob Weir'; 'RGB ES'
Subject: RE: Include link to Forums on incubator page?
RGB and I and other Forum mavens
I think there may be some confusion between BZ user IDs and the e-mail that ID
forwards to.
For technical reasons, the original one-word User IDs were replaced by their
corresponding one-word@ openoffice.org e-mail addresses. That address is used
as an identifier and, as far as I know, has
.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 12:04
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: How to change the login of AOO BZ instance?
I think there may be some confusion between BZ user IDs and the e-mail that ID
forwards
Ahah. Yes.
Agreed:
In an issue or issue comment, any link with a BZ User Name
has a mailto: behind it. It will be the *current* e-mail
that the account is set to forward to.
For example, I just changed my forwarding for orcmid@ openoffice.org in the AOO
BZ to orcmid@ apache.org,
I think there are 2.5 conversations here.
1. One is about how the forwarding address on a BZ account is visible on all
BZ pages where the account identifier appears as the visible text of a link.
That is probably worth a BZ issue (!?) on having that changed. Experts with BZ
moxie need to
safe [;).
-Original Message-
From: TJ Frazier [mailto:tjfraz...@cfl.rr.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 13:47
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to change the login of AOO BZ instance?
Hi, Dennis,
On 11/13/2011 15:14, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
[ ... ]
The confirmation
RGB and I and other Forum mavens are going to work something up and I'll bring
it into the blog queue by end of day Monday (US PST).
@Rob: Meanwhile, please go ahead and add it to the podling status file.
- Dennis E. Hamilton
tools for document interoperability, http://nfoWorks.org
Since it appears that the forwarding list will never be in ASF custody, I don't
see how the project has any recourse but Plan 1.
Everything else depends on action by Oracle or access to processes operated by
Oracle. I recommend that Oracle action be requested and that Plan 1 be carried
out
I'm concerned that there is some confusion of lists with the myname@
openoffice.org ID/forwarding scheme.
Posts are already going to the lists about their imminent shutdown, with
indication of suggested alternatives at ooo-*@ i.a.o lists.
There has not been a comparable effort to notify the
...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 18:42
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Shutdown of openoffice.org email forwarder: How to notify users
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I'm concerned that there is some confusion of lists
Unfortunately[?], zombies.org is taken. But kingzombie.org seems to be
available. Thanks for bringing playfulness to this place. You've been missed,
Louis.
- Dennis E. Hamilton
tools for document interoperability, http://nfoWorks.org/
dennis.hamil...@acm.org gsm: +1-206-779-9430
b) Apache OpenOffice
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Donald Harbison [mailto:dpharbi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2011 19:47
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Trademark and Brand
As promised, here's the ballot. Choose one, cast your vote. If none of
I concur on reverting the patch.
It would be appropriate for a committer who has not seen the patch to use the
bugzilla report to independently derive a fix from the information that
isolates the defect, assuming that such details are available. I have the
feeling that is not the case, and
Short addition:
1. There are alternatives to using SVN from the command line. I use
TortoiseSVN quite happily.
2. Louis is an Apache OO.o incubator committer and can start working at once.
3. I would not consider the old site dead but I agree that many changes
should be made at our
: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 14:40
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [CODE] issue 118576: Crash on close
Hi Dennis,
Le 8 nov. 11 à 22:45, Dennis E. Hamilton a écrit :
I concur on reverting the patch.
Me too : Andre explained everything and convinced me that the issue
needs
Subject: Re: Need a current build for WinXP 32bit
On 31.10.2011 20:18, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Regina,
I would like to find an already built Win32 WinXP version too. I
despair of ever succeeding in building one myself without extensive
practice with the tools that I am expected to operate
I was digging around in my personal way-back machine for where discussion about
myname@ openoffice.org had occurred. Something struck me about the magic
500,000 number.
When IDs are issued, even if later de-activated, the ID is usually retained to
avoid accidental re-issue of it to a
+1 I heartily agree with Dave's suggestion.
The issue has been made very clear by Andrea and I think it would be good to
raise an issue on the LEGAL JIRA. (Registration required, but I don't think
committer status is needed.) Also, legal-discuss@ apache.org is an useful
place, but my
So, this exceptionalism for friends for Rob is being offered, without
consideration at all for those friends of OpenOffice.org who have relied on
those e-mail forwardings and proudly organized their e-mail existence around
that affiliation. This smells a bit like mit.alumni.edu (or whatever
at the time that I wrote the following.)
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 11:19
To: 'us...@global.libreoffice.org'
Subject: RE: [libreoffice-users] MS font exploit
There are two microsoft.com pages that relate
site.
- Dennis E. Hamilton
tools for document interoperability, http://nfoWorks.org/
dennis.hamil...@acm.org gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Paul Chiron [mailto:jpchi...@sud-ouest.org]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 09:36
To: ooo-dev
during staging process
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.orgwrote:
[ ... ]
Also, ooo-users might be a better target than ooo-dev.
Why? These would be people reporting problems with the staging web site,
not the product
[ ... ]
smime.p7s
Description: S
) suggestions.
On 11/2/2011 12:01 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Hi Dave,
where I am confused is the focus on Mailing-List forwarding rather than E-mail
forwarding. I can't tell what the intended behaviors are.
Let's get clear:
1. If someone posts to one of the old e-mail list addresses (e.g
sure that
eventuality is forestalled.
I recommend that a single list be chosen for continuation.
At present, instead of providing shelter of the ooo-marketing list from the
clutter on ooo-dev, this is either adding clutter to ooo-dev or it really needs
to be a [DISCUSS] there.
- Dennis E
The Apache OOo PPMC announces the addition of initial committer
T.J. Frazier: Apache ID tj
The list of all current podling committers is at:
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#ooo.
Committers have a defined role in the workings of the Apache
Software Foundation:
The Apache OOo PPMC announces the addition of committer
Ariel Constenla-Haile: Apache ID arielch
The list of all current podling committers is at:
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#ooo.
Committers have a defined role in the workings of the Apache
Software Foundation:
. I have an appraisal of the issue. It is something
that requires mutual understanding and, out of our mutual attention, the
prospect of a workable solution.
- Dennis E. Hamilton
tools for document interoperability, http://nfoWorks.org/
dennis.hamil...@acm.org gsm: +1-206-779-9430
I share the congratulations.
Also, I want to acknowledge the contribution of Terry Ellison. Although there
was an upset, Terry has operated silently to continue some of this work. And,
without his initial efforts, none of this would have happened at all.
- Dennis E. Hamilton
tools
, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
If every post on this thread is being cross-posted to two lists, why is it
being conducted on two lists? All it does is expose the prospect of the
thread forking between the two lists and turning into a tangled mess. It
also
] Shut-down of all name@ openoffice.org e-mail addresses
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
There are problems concerning migration of yourname@ openoffice.org,
listname@
openoffice.org, and servicename@ openoffice.org. Consequently, all
yourname
The Apache OOo PPMC announces the addition of Initial Committer
Michael Stehmann: Apache ID mikeadvo
The list of all current podling committers is at:
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#ooo.
Committers have a defined role in the workings of the Apache
Software Foundation:
Whoa, now I am really confused. This seems to have gone in the opposite
direction than what I thought.
First it narrowed down to privileging some small set of BZ users.
And then protecting our committers that have @openoffice.org email addresses.
Also, I don't think there had been any
: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 20:35
To: orc...@apache.org
Cc: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; 'Joe Schaefer'
Subject: Re: [ISSUE] Shut-down of all name@ openoffice.org e-mail addresses
On Nov 1, 2011, at 8:07 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Whoa, now I am really confused. This seems to have gone
Regina,
I would like to find an already built Win32 WinXP version too. I despair of
ever succeeding in building one myself without extensive practice with the
tools that I am expected to operate to accomplish that.
I don't know how to deal with the ATL dependencies. I thought that it was
Site: Bugs and Improvements
On 10/31/11 5:55 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Oct 30, 2011, at 9:37 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
[ ... ]
4. This page, for Downloads, linked from the ES home page, has a PayPal
button and solicits $25 donations for downloads:
http://ooo-site.apache.org/es/programa
As far as I can tell, it is a condition of Apache governance that it be done on
the list. That is a requirement for how The Apache Way works. It is up to all
of us to have it work.
I don't believe, however, that ooo-marketing counts as a list where
deliberation on matters of the project
-commits? CWiki is just as visible there as BZ.
I don't know what you are -1 ing?
Regards,
Dave
On Oct 31, 2011, at 12:18 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
+1
I agree that the PayPal and other specific donation pages on http://
*.openoffice.org properties must be removed. Likewise the Team Office
I meant when Dave is done.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 15:32
To: 'ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org'
Subject: RE: Staging OOo Site: Bugs and Improvements
I was talking about the CWiki commit messages that go
I've run into some things on the staging site, some from templates/boilerplate,
some for other content issues.
Do these go into the Bugzilla? I don't feel comfortable mucking around with
them directly without someone more expert deciding the course of action.
- Dennis
-Original
: Bugs and Improvements
On Oct 30, 2011, at 8:40 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Oct 30, 2011, at 8:10 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I've run into some things on the staging site, some from
templates/boilerplate, some for other content issues.
I've made some changes today that might show
Rob,
It is an interesting social observation that distrust is not exemplary of being
trustworthy. (Distrust is a kind of permission to be righteously untrustworthy,
as is too easily demonstrated in world affairs as well as closer to home in
regard to specific events already discussed on this
Having some lists on Sourceforge makes it clear to me that you don't want to go
there. My sourceforge e-mail address, the one associated with the lists,
receives an incredible number of bounces of false e-mails allegedly from the
list as well as crap sent to the list. It is difficult to avoid
+1
I am very much in support of the view that Dave has evolved in this discussion.
The discussion is not about the private security teams each project must have
to deal with its security issues and to ensure the secure operation of the
dealing with security issues.
If there is to be a
+1
Good eye!
[For me, the first problem is to get it all written down. Then the problem is
to figure out how to make it the most useful to the reader, ideally by having
the biggest questions answered first. For everything but the first part (and
sometimes that too), it is useful to have
Umm, head-slap moment.
I happen to be the proud owner of worthiness.org.
Truly.
It is not hosted, but I have been sitting on the domain name for several years.
It was part of my M.Sc in IT project on Open Systems Trustworthiness. I won't
go into that here. There is a reasonable capsule
Dave, if you are going to do that, just relabeling a thread is not helpful.
Please compose a specific concrete proposal under a [DISCUSS], and announce the
duration and end-time for a lazy consensus at the top.
Give it at least 3 full 24-hour calendar days.
I don't have any sense that there
this to a successful conclusion.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 15:45
To: 'ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org'
Cc: 'Dave Fisher'
Subject: RE: [proposal] Neutral / shared security list ...
Dave, if you are going to do that, just
Andrew, I think part of the confusion is from the discussion leading up to the
creation of ooo-security and some related discussion about why securityteam@
was not enough at that time.
Without getting into the he-said,she-said part of it, that seems to be the
origin. There was more when the
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [proposal] Neutral / shared security list ...
On Oct 25, 2011, at 4:01 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Oh, and the most important part:
In want way is the AOOo party to the consensus that is reached? That
ooo-security (an agent of the PPMC, essentially
security list ...
On Oct 25, 2011, at 4:05 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Oh, and the most important part:
In want way is the AOOo party to the consensus that is reached? That
ooo-security (an agent of the PPMC
Preview
release. It and the second will certainly be ways to bring the QA,
localization, and related activities back into action as well.
Exciting times ahead!
- Dennis E. Hamilton
tools for document interoperability, http://nfoWorks.org/
dennis.hamil...@acm.org gsm: +1-206-779-9430
Um, I think there is a lot of how to submit a bug, how to find bugzilla
information on OO.o that will need to be cleaned up still.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 13:54
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Also, there is clean-up needed on the AOOo bugzilla instance. Is there a place
for issues about that?
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 14:30
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Migration Status Page
. If we fill it up with buts and caveats and
exceptions, then it will not serve its purpose as a high level
overview.
-Rob
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 24, 2011, at 2:30 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
Um, I think there is a lot of how to submit a bug
I read somewhere, and I don't know where, that ASF did not want torrents to be
used. I'm guessing that the issue is related to ensuring the integrity and
authenticity of packaged releases. Of course, one cannot prevent folks from
torrenting binaries, but it is not something ASF wanted to
License Grants (section 3), the terms appear quite similar to those of
the Apache iCLA. In this case, the grant of license is to Nokia. There are
other terms that may be of concern and I offer no opinion on the acceptability
of the Qt iCLA by anyone.
That's about enough for Sunday reading.
- Dennis E
First, no votes that were not on the [VOTE] thread are reflected in the report.
The [VOTE] announcement stated that only votes on that one thread would be
counted. (I know that got trimmed on various threads, but I can't do anything
about that.)
I am sorry that two voters placed their votes
of the OpenOffice.org Proposal
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@openoffice.org
wrote:
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org
wrote:
The vote to accept the proposal for governance
Pedro,
GCI participation is being discussed on the dev-community list. You should
check into that conversation, dev @ community.apache.org
with archive at http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/continuum-dev/.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Pedro Giffuni [mailto:p...@apache.org]
the various lists accordingly.
For general information:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html is the guide for podling
mentors,
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html#Incubator+ASF+Board+Reports is
the related PPMC guide
- Dennis E. Hamilton
tools for document
+1
-Original Message-
From: Shane Curcuru [mailto:a...@shanecurcuru.org]
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2011 05:46
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] Staged Migration of OO.o domain properties (long)
It would be very useful if people interested in the branding aspects of
The Apache OOo PPMC announces the addition of initial committer
Pavel Janík: paveljanik @ apache.org.
The list of all current podling committers is at:
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#ooo.
Committers have a defined rôle in the workings of the Apache
Software Foundation:
consensus is
required.
AOOo ooo-security follows that list, as I described previously. And there
appear to be at least three of us from the AOOo PPMC that are individually
subscribed. So AOOo representation in the discussion can be assured.
What's next?
- Dennis E. Hamilton
tools
, 2011, at 7:45 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
The Apache OOo PPMC announces the addition of initial committer
Pavel Janík: paveljanik @ apache.org.
Does Pavel's Apache id have an í or i? You have an i here?
Regards,
Dave
The list of all current podling committers is at:
http
Pedro,
Yes, GSoC and GCI are different.
Also, I don't think it involves adding committers, but it definitely adds work
for GCI mentors. In any case, I recommend that you hop onto
d...@community.apache.org while there is time to find out what is required and
whether ASF will be
Correction: Pavel was not an initial committer. (I borrowed the wrong message
to use as boilerplate.) Pavel was invited by [VOTE] of the PPMC and his
establishment as a committer has been completed.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday
at 08:11 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
It is not something that can be done unilaterally here on the AOOo podling.
Do you propose that this be discussed at securityteam@ OO.o? It would
seem that is where consensus is required.
Last I checked only a few from TDF's security group
@incubator.apache.org; lsecurity
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Neutral / shared security list proposal
Hi Dennis list,
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 08:11 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
It is not something that can be done unilaterally here on the AOOo
podling.
Do you propose that this be discussed
to cross post like this between public and private lists.
Let's stop that. Now.
-Rob
2011/10/21 Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org:
OK, I am going ahead and including securityteam@OO.o in this discussion, then
all of us can see what's being discussed.
I am adding the full text
+1
-Original Message-
From: TJ Frazier [mailto:tjfraz...@cfl.rr.com]
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2011 16:38
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Disposition of *.services.oo.o
On 10/21/2011 18:48, Kay Schenk wrote:
On 10/21/2011 01:31 PM, TJ Frazier wrote:
Dave,
I want to be
) assuming that
tarballs of those source trees were captured.
- Dennis E. Hamilton
tools for document interoperability, http://nfoWorks.org/
dennis.hamil...@acm.org gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid
-Original Message-
From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Friday, October
Forum operators along with the impending 2011-10-28 shutdown of the current
server that was learned of today.
- Dennis E. Hamilton, for the Apache OpenOffice.org PPMC
TALLY OF VOTES CAST
+1 Dave Barton : bmcs PPMC
+1 David Fisher : wave PPMC
+1 Wolf Halton : wolfhalton PPMC
+1
501 - 600 of 1112 matches
Mail list logo
