This event looks great!
On 2011/08/04 11:32, Dennis E. Hamilton said:
> That's one of the greatest *camp event pages I've seen. The extensive
> directions and great maps have me seriously regret I won't be walking any of
> those streets in September.
>
> Kudos,
>
> - Dennis
>
> -Origina
Hello Katzunari-san;
This is not an official response but we will continue receiving
Bug reports and we will provide an upgrade path. This involves
some limited support: we will likely want to End-Of-Line ASAP
non-Apache releases, and we won't be distributing them anymore.
Like in all opensource
That's one of the greatest *camp event pages I've seen. The extensive
directions and great maps have me seriously regret I won't be walking any of
those streets in September.
Kudos,
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Donald Harbison [mailto:dpharbi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, Augu
Hi all,
Who will support OpenOffice.org 3.3.0 and previous versions?
We have got many OpenOffice.org 3 users.
We have many local government users, SMB users and big company users.
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/JA/Marketing/OpenOffice.org_Deployments
Some use OpenOffice.org 3.2. Many u
Ross,
Thanks for re-posting my bungled link attempt.
Yes, this is a very cool opportunity for Apache folks and those from other
communities; e.g. LibreOffice, to come together. I hope those here on list
will forward accordingly.
best!
/don
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>
I've got completely lost in all the mutations of the "Refactoring"
thread, and don't recall all that has been said, so please forgive me if
what I'm about to suggest has been dealt with already.
Two low-barrier methods I have seen work quite successfully on wikis,
forums, and similar sites are:
1
Hi all,
All the contents of Japanese site[1], wiki[2], forum[3], mailing
lists[4] are essential assets to create a new Japanese OpenOffice.org
[1] http://ja.openoffice.org/
[2] http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Special:PrefixIndex/JA/
[3] http://user.services.openoffice.org/ja/forum/
[4] ht
Hi Dennis and all,
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 3:37 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> My interpretation is that we could have Apache ooo as the identifier of the
> core Apache project
> built on what we factor out of the Oracle grant, leaving OpenOffice.org as a
> web site and
> a family of distribut
On Aug 3, 2011, at 4:31 PM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
>> Sent: Thursday, 4 August 2011 8:54 AM
>> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: How to handle the downloads?
>>
>> Am 08/04/2011 12:38 AM, schrie
On Aug 3, 2011, at 12:52 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> Here's an item cribbed from another list that is relevant to concerns about
> downloads and perhaps user-created content on OpenOffice.org:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:field...@gbiv.com]
> Sent: Wednesda
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> Sent: Thursday, 4 August 2011 8:54 AM
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: How to handle the downloads?
>
> Am 08/04/2011 12:38 AM, schrieb Gavin McDonald:
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >>
Am 08/03/2011 11:58 PM, schrieb Andrew Rist:
On 8/3/2011 2:27 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Do you mean this?
http://www.openoffic.org
http://www.openoffic.org/news
Or which landing pages do you have in mind?
An idea: is there any easy way to get
Am 08/04/2011 12:38 AM, schrieb Gavin McDonald:
-Original Message-
From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Wednesday, 3 August 2011 6:45 PM
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to handle the downloads?
Am 08/03/2011 02:17 AM, schrieb Gavin McDonald:
-O
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, 3 August 2011 6:45 PM
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: How to handle the downloads?
>
> Am 08/03/2011 02:17 AM, schrieb Gavin McDonald:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: M
On 08/03/2011 02:52 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/03/2011 11:41 PM, schrieb Raphael Bircher:
Am 03.08.11 23:27, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Marcus (OOo)
wrote:
Do you mean this?
http://www.openoffic.org
http://www.openoffic.org/news
Or which landing pages do you have
On 8/3/2011 2:27 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Do you mean this?
http://www.openoffic.org
http://www.openoffic.org/news
Or which landing pages do you have in mind?
An idea: is there any easy way to get it into the header, so it is on
every page?
Am 03.08.11 23:52, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 08/03/2011 11:41 PM, schrieb Raphael Bircher:
Am 03.08.11 23:27, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Marcus (OOo)
wrote:
Do you mean this?
http://www.openoffic.org
http://www.openoffic.org/news
Or which landing pages do you have in mi
Am 08/03/2011 11:41 PM, schrieb Raphael Bircher:
Am 03.08.11 23:27, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Do you mean this?
http://www.openoffic.org
http://www.openoffic.org/news
Or which landing pages do you have in mind?
An idea: is there any easy way to ge
Am 03.08.11 23:27, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Do you mean this?
http://www.openoffic.org
http://www.openoffic.org/news
Or which landing pages do you have in mind?
An idea: is there any easy way to get it into the header, so it is on
every page?
No,
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Do you mean this?
>
> http://www.openoffic.org
> http://www.openoffic.org/news
>
> Or which landing pages do you have in mind?
>
An idea: is there any easy way to get it into the header, so it is on
every page? Something like "News: Apache Op
On 3 August 2011 22:20, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Donald Harbison wrote:
>> I am keen to help facilitate an Apache OpenOffice theme within the upcoming
>> Apache BarCamp scheduled for Oxford on September 11[1].
>> In particular, it would be great if developers from both Op
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Donald Harbison wrote:
> I am keen to help facilitate an Apache OpenOffice theme within the upcoming
> Apache BarCamp scheduled for Oxford on September 11[1].
> In particular, it would be great if developers from both OpenOffice and
> LibreOffice could meetup. We ca
Am 08/03/2011 10:31 PM, schrieb Larry Gusaas:
On 2011/08/03 2:26 PM Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Sorry, of course I meant these:
http://www.openoffice.org
http://www.openoffice.org/news
I think you knew this. ;-)
Of course. But only after clicking on the previous links which opened a
pop up in Safari
Hi;
--- On Wed, 8/3/11, Mathias Bauer wrote:
...
>
> As Stephan wrote, the structure can be changed easily
> afterwards.
> Building and packaging should follow dependencies (after
> all that was the idea of our new build environment) and
> so the directory structure is of second order importance.
Am 03.08.2011 21:23, schrieb Mathias Bauer:
On 03.08.2011 10:38, IngridvdM wrote:
Am 03.08.2011 10:24, schrieb Stephan Bergmann:
On Aug 3, 2011, at 8:45 AM, IngridvdM wrote:
Ok agreed, binfilter is not the best example.
But what about the general idea to have a second directory where we can p
On 2011/08/03 2:26 PM Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Sorry, of course I meant these:
http://www.openoffice.org
http://www.openoffice.org/news
I think you knew this. ;-)
Of course. But only after clicking on the previous links which opened a pop up in Safari which
wouldn't go away until I force quit Safa
Sorry, of course I meant these:
http://www.openoffice.org
http://www.openoffice.org/news
I think you knew this. ;-)
Marcus
Am 08/03/2011 10:13 PM, schrieb Larry Gusaas:
On 2011/08/03 1:43 PM Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Do you mean this?
Or which landing pages do you have in mind?
Marcus
Why
On 2011/08/03 1:43 PM Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Do you mean this?
Or which landing pages do you have in mind?
Marcus
Why are you posting spam links? Both links leave out the final e in openoffice and take me to
spam sites.
Larry
--
_
Larry I. Gusaas
Moose Jaw,
I am keen to help facilitate an Apache OpenOffice theme within the upcoming
Apache BarCamp scheduled for Oxford on September 11[1].
In particular, it would be great if developers from both OpenOffice and
LibreOffice could meetup. We can organically shape the event depending on
who opts in.
If you c
Here's an item cribbed from another list that is relevant to concerns about
downloads and perhaps user-created content on OpenOffice.org:
-Original Message-
From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:field...@gbiv.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 12:31
To: legal-disc...@apache.org
Subject: Re: C
On Aug 3, 2011, at 12:43 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Do you mean this?
>
> http://www.openoffic.org
> http://www.openoffic.org/news
>
> Or which landing pages do you have in mind?
According to the svn from Kenai - Kay was the one who made the change to add
the latest news on the main page.
Wha
Do you mean this?
http://www.openoffic.org
http://www.openoffic.org/news
Or which landing pages do you have in mind?
Marcus
Am 08/03/2011 09:29 PM, schrieb Shane Curcuru:
(Taking the opportunity to Refactor a new thread on OpenOffice.org)
Are there any short term plans to update the main l
Am 08/03/2011 08:22 PM, schrieb Dave Fisher:
Hi Marcus,
This is really good.
I've updated the diagram with more details and divided it into a 3-way-method:
Download Choice #1:
Of course the One-Click-Download URL.
Download Choice #2:
If an install file is not available (wrong OS, no language
(Taking the opportunity to Refactor a new thread on OpenOffice.org)
Are there any short term plans to update the main landing pages of the
existing OpenOffice.org website(s) to provide user awareness of the
transition of the product and project to Apache?
I don't know 1) how long it will take
On 03.08.2011 10:38, IngridvdM wrote:
> Am 03.08.2011 10:24, schrieb Stephan Bergmann:
>> On Aug 3, 2011, at 8:45 AM, IngridvdM wrote:
>>> Ok agreed, binfilter is not the best example.
>>> But what about the general idea to have a second directory where we can
>>> place all the stuff that is not
On 03.08.2011 20:25, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> What I managed to glean from the LibreOffice discussion lists is that
> binfilter will be separately installable but probably not taken to
> end-of-life. (As platforms change, it may be necessary to make new
> builds of it.)
Binfilter already is i
The Incubator Branding Guide notes:
"Podlings websites SHOULD contain the Apache Incubator Project logo as
sign of affiliation."
More importantly, the key point is that podlings must ensure their
public websites make it clear they are a podling; or rather, that they
are not (yet) an official
Am 03.08.2011 17:04, schrieb Rob Weir:
Some good points. Maybe we want to start (or steal) an FAQ on similar
"netiquette" points? It might fit in the "Community FAQ's" section.
There is a good one already at Apache:
http://www.apache.org/dev/contrib-email-tips.html
Maybe we can link it prom
Sounds good. I think there are some rules about how the Apache symbols are
used for in-incubator podlings. (There is a revealing topic on T-shirts
somewhere, either legal-discuss or general-incubator, I think.)
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.n
What I managed to glean from the LibreOffice discussion lists is that binfilter
will be separately installable but probably not taken to end-of-life. (As
platforms change, it may be necessary to make new builds of it.)
There is also discussion about moving some annoying dependencies into the
b
Hi Marcus,
This is really good.
> I've updated the diagram with more details and divided it into a 3-way-method:
>
> Download Choice #1:
> Of course the One-Click-Download URL.
>
> Download Choice #2:
> If an install file is available (wrong OS, no language, etc.) the user can
> select from a
My reply is to Andy Brown's post, not one of yours. It appears that I failed
to CC: him.
I have no quarrel about figuring out where PPMC oversight goes and how it is
exercised. I allowed for that in my response to Andy with regard to
special-privileged cases. I chose not to drag that detail
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> > There are some first steps proceding with moving portions of the existng
> > OpenOffice.org site to Apache. See, for example,
> >
> > http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/download/index.
On Aug 3, 2011, at 7:25 AM, Ian Lynch wrote:
> To be fair, an overly aggressive tone can do just as much poisoning as a
> defensive one. I think it is also worth bearing in mind that a lot of people
> here are not native English speakers and so it is easy to read things into
> posts that were eit
Hi Kay,
Amazing the volume of emails that came in while driving from San Francisco to
Los Angeles.
On Aug 3, 2011, at 8:29 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> There are some first steps proceding with moving portions of the existng
> OpenOffice.org site to Apache. See, for example,
>
> http://incubator.a
Binfilter will be good for many more time consuming discussions. Many
different opinions on if/how to change them, many different opinions on
if/why to keep them.
Assuming that the binfilter source tree doesn't need clean-up because of
IP / license issues, I suggest to simply keep the folder a
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> 1. Is the current OpenOffice.org bugzilla not operating?
>
> 2. If the issues are about the migration, maybe we should activate a piece
> of the Apache JIRA so we can be more systematic, figuring out how to
> retire/merge it when the
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> 1. Well, if we *have* to require an iCLA because we choose (or are limited
> to) an approach that makes iCLA mandatory, there is nothing to be gained by
> conducting a survey on the matter.
>
> 2. If we come up with an approach where
Am 08/03/2011 06:46 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/03/2011 05:56 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Kay Schenkwrote:
There are some first steps proceding with moving portions of the existng
OpenOffice.org site to Apac
1. Well, if we *have* to require an iCLA because we choose (or are limited to)
an approach that makes iCLA mandatory, there is nothing to be gained by
conducting a survey on the matter.
2. If we come up with an approach where nothing is changed with regard to what
is currently user-editable,
I'll give you the context, from earlier in the thread.
> A specific question then that should not require diverting your
> current efforts. Is there a announcement list or some other mechanism
> to send an email to every registered wiki user?
>
> I don't want to take time away from your higher pr
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 08/03/2011 05:56 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>
>>> There are some first steps proceding with moving portions of the existng
>>> OpenOffice.org site to Apache. See, for example,
>>>
>>> h
I've updated the diagram with more details and divided it into a
3-way-method:
Download Choice #1:
Of course the One-Click-Download URL.
Download Choice #2:
If an install file is available (wrong OS, no language, etc.) the user
can select from a pre-defined list.
Download Choice #3:
The user
Dennis,
We are working on some ideas only. There are questions on how to deal
with the current OOo wiki and move it to Apache servers. The concern is
that there will be a lose of "active" users if there is a big change in
the way edits are made, i.e. requiring an iCLA. At this point we do n
Oracle Email Signature Logo
Andrew Rist | Interoperability Architect
Oracle Corporate Architecture Group
Redwood Shores, CA | 650.506.9847
On 8/3/2011 8:15 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Terry Ellison wrote:
On 03/08/11 15:14, Rob Weir wrote:
A specific question then
Am 08/03/2011 05:56 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
There are some first steps proceding with moving portions of the existng
OpenOffice.org site to Apache. See, for example,
http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/download/index.html
This page lacks
Le 3 août 11 à 17:49, Dennis E. Hamilton a écrit :
I believe LibreOffice is already taking action on binfilter, and it
would be useful to see if we can match their approach.
Also, I think there was (again on LibreOffice) a technical
discussion on simplifying the dependencies.
I did a lo
What message is that?
Can we get more concrete here, please.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:apa...@robweir.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 08:59
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Refactoring the brand: Apache ooo + OpenOffice.org? (was
re:OpenOffice.org bran
Let's slow down here. I don't recognize any alignment on what it is we think
we are asking for (or attempting to do). This is going way over the edge past
JFDI and/or lazy consensus.
-Original Message-
From: Andy Brown [mailto:a...@the-martin-byrd.net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011
I suppose it is rather obvious that we have moved far afield from the subject
line here.
At this point, I have no idea what problem there being a master announce list
solves:
1. What is it proposed to be used for?
2. Who will be doing that and speaking for whom?
- Dennis
-Original M
1. Is the current OpenOffice.org bugzilla not operating?
2. If the issues are about the migration, maybe we should activate a piece of
the Apache JIRA so we can be more systematic, figuring out how to retire/merge
it when the OpenOffice.org bugzilla comes over in whatever form we need it in.
TerryE wrote:
(Some) developers for some arcane reason seem to like DLs. AFAIK, others
and the majority of users hate them and regard them as spam, preferring
less invasive pull technologies such as forums and subscription services
such as gmane. For example, I routinely work 6 forums and 4 wiki
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:44 AM, TerryE wrote:
> On 03/08/11 16:15, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Terry Ellison
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/08/11 15:14, Rob Weir wrote:
A specific question then that should not require diverting your
current efforts. Is there a
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> There are some first steps proceding with moving portions of the existng
> OpenOffice.org site to Apache. See, for example,
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/download/index.html
>
> This page lacks headers and footers, which brings m
On 3 August 2011 16:16, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 08/03/2011 04:57 PM, schrieb Ross Gardler:
...
>> If that's the case then ignore my mail.
>
> Hm, not really, as we could bring together both magics into one process.
OH, that bit is "easy" the "choose mirror" part of your "JS Magic"
would reques
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/03/2011 04:54 PM, schrieb Andy Brown:
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
I've created a little diagram how I think the download has to work:
http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/docs/download_process.png
As it seems we cannot go on like we did with OOo the JS magic has to
chan
I believe LibreOffice is already taking action on binfilter, and it would be
useful to see if we can match their approach.
Also, I think there was (again on LibreOffice) a technical discussion on
simplifying the dependencies. This was initially by having redundancy, with
the idea that a better
On 03/08/11 16:15, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Terry Ellison wrote:
On 03/08/11 15:14, Rob Weir wrote:
A specific question then that should not require diverting your
current efforts. Is there a announcement list or some other mechanism
to send an email to every registere
There are some first steps proceding with moving portions of the existng
OpenOffice.org site to Apache. See, for example,
http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/download/index.html
This page lacks headers and footers, which brings me to...
I know there's been discussion about the current Op
I have some random issues in the back of my head that I know we need
to resolve at some point, but not now, but I don't want to forget
them. I'm going to start listing them at the bottom of the Project
Planning wiki page here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Project+Planning
Am 08/03/2011 04:54 PM, schrieb Andy Brown:
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
I've created a little diagram how I think the download has to work:
http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/docs/download_process.png
As it seems we cannot go on like we did with OOo the JS magic has to
change a bit, how to reco
On 08/02/2011 01:45 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Kay,
<-- lots snipped -->
http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/www/index.html
ok, I jsut updated my svn trunk but before you added this I guess. I'll
take a look. I'll start a new thread on something related -- a new logo.
Will be ther
Am 08/03/2011 04:57 PM, schrieb Ross Gardler:
On 3 August 2011 15:53, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 3 August 2011 15:47, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
I've created a little diagram how I think the download has to work:
http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/docs/download_process.png
As it seems we cannot
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Terry Ellison wrote:
> On 03/08/11 15:14, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> A specific question then that should not require diverting your
>> current efforts. Is there a announcement list or some other mechanism
>> to send an email to every registered wiki user?
>
> At a tec
Am 08/03/2011 04:53 PM, schrieb Ross Gardler:
On 3 August 2011 15:47, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
I've created a little diagram how I think the download has to work:
http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/docs/download_process.png
As it seems we cannot go on like we did with OOo the JS magic has t
On 03/08/11 15:14, Rob Weir wrote:
A specific question then that should not require diverting your
current efforts. Is there a announcement list or some other mechanism
to send an email to every registered wiki user?
At a technical level, it's simple to run a query dumping all of the mail
addre
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Ian Lynch wrote:
> On 3 August 2011 15:10, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Andre Schnabel
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Rob,
>> >
>> >> Von: Rob Weir
>> >
>> >> >
>> >> > I think there is a difference between informed hypothesis and
>> >> speculation
>>
On 3 August 2011 15:53, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 3 August 2011 15:47, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>> I've created a little diagram how I think the download has to work:
>>
>> http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/docs/download_process.png
>>
>> As it seems we cannot go on like we did with OOo the JS
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
I've created a little diagram how I think the download has to work:
http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/docs/download_process.png
As it seems we cannot go on like we did with OOo the JS magic has to
change a bit, how to recognize the language, OS and country to assembl
On 3 August 2011 15:47, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> I've created a little diagram how I think the download has to work:
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/docs/download_process.png
>
> As it seems we cannot go on like we did with OOo the JS magic has to change
> a bit, how to recognize the la
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Andre Schnabel wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Von: Rob Weir
>
>> >
>> > There is no need to try to find something in my mails what I didn't
>> actually write.
>> >
>>
>> Andre, perhaps you forgot, but you did speculate on this earlier in
>> the thread, when you wrote:
>
> Oh,
I've created a little diagram how I think the download has to work:
http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/docs/download_process.png
As it seems we cannot go on like we did with OOo the JS magic has to
change a bit, how to recognize the language, OS and country to assemble
the nearest mirro
On 3 August 2011 15:10, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Andre Schnabel
> wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> >> Von: Rob Weir
> >
> >> >
> >> > I think there is a difference between informed hypothesis and
> >> speculation
> >> > :-)
> >>
> >> And neither is the same as facts. I'm conce
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Terry Ellison wrote:
>
> Rob, a nice polemic but why is it relevant to a point about /usage patterns/
> on the wiki. I am already working 12+ hours a day on migration this /pro
> bono/, not salaried by some company to do my job. If you want hard data to
> info
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Andre Schnabel wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
>> Von: Rob Weir
>
>> >
>> > I think there is a difference between informed hypothesis and
>> speculation
>> > :-)
>>
>> And neither is the same as facts. I'm concerned when I hear
>> paternalistic statements of "our contributors
Hi,
> Von: Rob Weir
> >
> > There is no need to try to find something in my mails what I didn't
> actually write.
> >
>
> Andre, perhaps you forgot, but you did speculate on this earlier in
> the thread, when you wrote:
Oh, sorry, but I did not see this as speculation ...
>
> On Tue, Aug 2,
On 3 August 2011 14:45, Andre Schnabel wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> > Von: Rob Weir
>
> >
> > Sorry, replacing Andre's speculation with your speculation is not the
> > same as introducing facts.
>
> I did not do any speculation in my mail, the only thing I did was
> to quote (again) Manfred's questions
On 03/08/11 14:38, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Ian Lynch wrote:
On 3 August 2011 14:14, Rob Weir wrote:
Ah. OK. He was asking for speculation on why the traffic is less now
than a year ago. Impossible to say, since I can't find any data on
what the traffic actually wa
Hi Rob,
> Von: Rob Weir
> >
> > I think there is a difference between informed hypothesis and
> speculation
> > :-)
>
> And neither is the same as facts. I'm concerned when I hear
> paternalistic statements of "our contributors will never post patches"
> or "They would never ever sign the iCLA
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Andre Schnabel wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
>> Von: Rob Weir
>
>>
>> Sorry, replacing Andre's speculation with your speculation is not the
>> same as introducing facts.
>
> I did not do any speculation in my mail, the only thing I did was
> to quote (again) Manfred's questio
Hi Rob,
> Von: Rob Weir
>
> Sorry, replacing Andre's speculation with your speculation is not the
> same as introducing facts.
I did not do any speculation in my mail, the only thing I did was
to quote (again) Manfred's questions (that you did not see before).
A simple:
- no I did not poke th
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Ian Lynch wrote:
> On 3 August 2011 14:14, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:02 AM, TerryE wrote:
>> > On 03/08/11 13:57, Rob Weir wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Andre Schnabel
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi Rob,
>> >>>
>> >>> -
On 3 August 2011 14:14, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:02 AM, TerryE wrote:
> > On 03/08/11 13:57, Rob Weir wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Andre Schnabel
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Rob,
> >>>
> >>> Original-Nachricht
>
> Von: Rob Weir
>
Hi Stephan,
On Wednesday, 2011-08-03 10:22:08 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On Aug 3, 2011, at 12:28 AM, Eike Rathke wrote:
> > The problem with binfilter is that it depends on modules not in
> > binfilter, changing them incompatibly may entail changes necessary to
> > binfilter, those changes
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:02 AM, TerryE wrote:
> On 03/08/11 13:57, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Andre Schnabel
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Rob,
>>>
>>> Original-Nachricht
Von: Rob Weir
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Manfred A. Reiter
wrote:
On 03/08/11 13:57, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Andre Schnabel wrote:
Hi Rob,
Original-Nachricht
Von: Rob Weir
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Manfred A. Reiter
wrote:
2011/8/3 Rob Weir
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Manfred A. Reiter
wrote:
2011/8/2
Am 03.08.11 13:58, schrieb Andre Schnabel:
Hi Rob,
Original-Nachricht
Von: Rob Weir
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Manfred A. Reiter
wrote:
2011/8/3 Rob Weir
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Manfred A. Reiter
wrote:
2011/8/2 Rob Weir
Curiously, it reports only 5 of
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Andre Schnabel wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Original-Nachricht
>> Von: Rob Weir
>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Manfred A. Reiter
>> wrote:
>> > 2011/8/3 Rob Weir
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Manfred A. Reiter
>> wrote:
>> >> > 2011/8
Category-A compatible licenses [1] as listed includes an entry labeled
"Creative Commons Attribution (CC-A)". This links to a CC-BY 2.5
license page [2].
We have a potential contribution of user guides for the OpenOffice
Podling that is dual licensed under GPL and CC-BY 3.0.
How should we procee
Hi Rob,
Original-Nachricht
> Von: Rob Weir
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Manfred A. Reiter
> wrote:
> > 2011/8/3 Rob Weir
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Manfred A. Reiter
> wrote:
> >> > 2011/8/2 Rob Weir
> >> >>
> >> >> Curiously, it reports only 5 of th
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
