Andrew Rist wrote:
If anyone is concerned about sending their list to ooo-dev, you can send
it to Ross ( rgardler at apache) instead, and at the end of the period
(next Sunday), he will send an anonymized summary
Perfect. This is a simple, efficient solution that will help people who
prefer
On 17/09/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a says
---
For the purposes of being a dependency to an Apache product, which licenses
are considered to be similar in terms to the Apache License 2.0
Here's my list. Limiting to 10 is indeed a challenge, there are about 5
other people that I would definitely have nominated...
Ariel Constenla-Haile (arielch)
Drew Jensen (atjensen)
Kay Schenk (kschenk)
Jürgen Schmidt (jsc)
Marcus Lange (marcus)
Pedro Giffuni (pfg)
Regina Henschel (regina)
On 17/09/2012 Andrew Rist wrote:
* This is not a vote. This is a search for consensus. Please no '-1'
replies. Let's see what this process produces, and then discuss
from there.
It seems that the process is working quite well, and that we are on the
right way to bootstrap a PMC by consensus.
On 16/09/2012 Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
the fact is that
there is a bug, that has to be closed as wontfix or left open depending
on a *new* one: install the MSVCRedist (which IMO is no defect, but
a request for enhancement).
For reference, I opened an enhancement request based on
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
I was busy another weekend to start to implement the new structure for
the DL scripting. The new webpages are accessible only here (as long as
they are not published):
http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/new/index.html
active PPMC members.
[ Andrea Pescetti]
The current PPMC, especially due to the bootstrapping phase that allowed
a large number of initial committers to enter the project without
demonstrating merit...
Of the initial committers
55 serve on the current PPMC (and all are committers)
15
Rob Weir wrote:
For example, we had some initial committers who sent out bulk emails
to a list of OpenOffice users. ... They issued
press releases claiming that OpenOffice would fail, that the only way
to get it to succeed was to send them money. They did this using a
name and website and
Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 03:43:10AM -0700, jsmith...@fastmail.fm wrote:
http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15t=56141
In all recent versions of Open Office, many people have complained that
they get an error about Java being corrupt. ...
On 07/09/2012 Andrew Rist wrote:
While on one hand I understand why so many of us want to be on the PMC,
a large PMC is not necessarily in the best interest of the project. The
PMC should not be making decisions about the direction of the project
and on who gets to do what - the PMC should be
On 11/09/2012 10:04, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sep 10, 2012, at 7:52 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
We have a code of conduct here:
http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/list-conduct.html
I believe we discussed that text for several weeks. It started on the
wiki. I eventually moved it onto the website.
On 11/09/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
On Sep 11, 2012, at 12:27 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Things that comes to my mind where I would always prefer an extension
solution:
- Connectors to some non free, non open source software based on
proprietary API's. ...
- Dependencies on external GPL, LGPL
David Ludovino wrote:
I'm developing an OOO extension and would like to add an options page to
it. The Developer's Guide has a section dedicated to it under
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/Extensions/Options_Dialog
. Though all links to the most important part, the
On 05/09/2012 Larry Gusaas wrote:
Is any work being done on this serious bug on Macs OS X ver. 10.7
10.8? There have been many help requests on the user forum and on the
ooo-users mailing list.
I confirm we had several reports in the forum and mailing list in
Italian too. I noticed them only
On 07/09/2012 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
The little team made up their minds for some additional, more general
events/sessions. The current list contains the following:
- Community panel
-- 90 (45-60) min. panel session with a couple of AOO community members
- Birds of Feather on community
On 10/09/2012 Guy Waterval wrote:
As I have more free time until June 2013, I plan to continue writing a user
documentation for OOoLight (Educoo.org). As the two products AOO et
OOoLight are, from an end user point of view of course, relatively similar
to use, my goal is to try to interfacing
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
.../PROJECT_NAME/VERSION/source/
.../PROJECT_NAME/VERSION/binaries/LANG/
.../PROJECT_NAME/VERSION/binaries/SDK/
Where PROJECT_NAME is something like ooo or aoo or openoffice.
Good. I'd use openoffice as project name, for clarity. It's longer
than alternatives but we
On 08/09/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
I'd like to shed some responsibilities and I hope there
are volunteers able or willing to learn to pick up the following: ...
4. Generally making sure things don't fall through the cracks. For
example, look at posts from a week ago and see which ones have not
been
RGB ES wrote:
2012/9/9 Marco A.G.Pintomarcoagpi...@mail.telepac.pt
LanguageTool extension ( http://www.languagetool.org ) no longer freezes
on AOO 3.4.1 .
Could it be added as default to the next release?
IMO, it is not that easy: LT is LGPL, which is not compatible with the
Apache license.
On 07/09/2012 Alex Thurgood wrote:
On 07/09/2012 03:50, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
I managed to build the MySQL Connector extension and make it work on
Thanks, great news! Indeed there were quite a few request for an updated
version.
A nice to have would be for Mac OSX too ;-)
I see
On 04/09/2012 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
There is a misunderstanding.
The module binfilter contains the needed code to import/export legacy
binary StarOffice file format in order to remove this code from the main
code base.
Module binflter is more or less a dead module, which hopefully can be
Kay Schenk wrote:
The release notes -- named as 3.4.1_rn.html are finally published in
production...
http://www.openoffice.org/zh-cn/releases/3.4.1_rn.html
And I've now added links to zh-cn and hu translations to
http://www.openoffice.org/development/releases/3.4.1.html
(there's probably no
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
[...]
Apache OpenOffice 3.4.0 and 3.4.1 support Java 7, which is the
recommended configuration; but (especially on 64-bit Windows) you might
receive warnings about the Java version being defective. In that case,
download and install [the most current JRE 6 version | link].
On 29/08/2012 Andreas Säger wrote:
Then extract some old version of Java6 (= revision 23), point the
office to it and try again. It's many times faster.
So, to recap: the best version of Java we could mention as a workaround
(after saying that Java 7 is supported and more secure, of course)
Kay Schenk wrote:
On 08/29/2012 06:22 PM, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
Thanks very much for your help! I didn't expect it to be such a complex
situation. Sorry for so many troubles brought to you.
Not a problem...just a mystery! :)
The CMS takes away most of the complexity in SVN, but for those
I found this commit from Marcus, from a few days ago:
Author: marcus
Date: Fri Aug 24 22:17:10 2012
New Revision: 1377138
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1377138view=rev
Log:
#i120681# Updated the link to JRE 6 to point to the lastest build instead of a
fixed version.
Now, the idea of
Rob Weir wrote:
Also, I wonder if it would be worth submitting a patch for Apache. It
looks like they have the other content types used by OpenOffice, but
not oxt files:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/conf/mime.types
Actually, it seems it's already been there for a
On 21/08/2012 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Actually I don't know how many other distributions are there, but the
only requests I've seen so far on mailing lists and forums are for
portable versions and, to a smaller extent, for versions compatible with
older Linux glibc versions (and Ariel provided
On 21/08/2012 Sylvain DENIS wrote:
I translated the text AOO 3.4.1 French. I would put online after the
official version.
Thanks, I've committed this to the French site using the naming
conventions currently used there, so
http://www.openoffice.org/fr/AOO_annonce_3_4_1.html
I saw that the
On 23/08/2012 22:06, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Also IMHO no need to separate between the languages.
Furthermore, when you have to check for a potential error, then you you
just need to verify this in a single directory and not more.
/stable/VERSION/all and every install file
The rest is OK, but
On 22/08/2012 Shenfeng Liu wrote:
(2) I'm not sure what's the difference between the status *Verified* and
*Closed*. IMO all the defects verified should finally be closed.
In the old OpenOffice.org project, where the QA process was probably
more formal, the meaning were the following:
-
On 23/08/2012 Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
IIRC OOo never released en-US language packs, that's why many
people working in translation, needing to check some UI string in
English, ended up installing the en-GB language pack.
Exactly. And this often happened also for volunteers busy with QA
Dave Fisher wrote:
Has anyone inspected the MIME Type returned? If it is not a proper
one for OXT then it is possible that IE8 is doing detection of the
type.
I had different results than Dave's, and I concluded I see different
MIME types depending on the mirror I get, so this depends on how
The Italian forum at
http://forum.openoffice.org/it/forum/
is not working, see the note by Ricardo below.
If an Infra JIRA issue is needed, I can of course create it. But it
would be good if someone with proper credentials could just jump in and
fix it... Seeing hte error message, I'd say that
On 18/08/2012 22:14, Taf wrote:
We'll ready to prepare the portable version. Today Andrea sent us the link
with last/final 3.4.1
we are waiting for a while only to be sure r1372282 will be confirmed
officially.
I see http://www.winpenpack.com/en/download.php?view.1341 has already
been updated
RGB ES wrote:
2012/8/23 Rory O'Farrellofarr...@iol.ie:
Announced on the en-Forum and by PM to the Volunteers.
Announced on ES forums. IT forums are not working...
As discussed in other threads, the IT forum now works thanks to imacat,
and RGB already posted there.
In the meantime, I:
-
sebb wrote:
On 21 August 2012 22:23, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Why? Could very well have a publish all changes mode (the current
only option) alongside the cherry picking (publish only selected file)
mode.
This thread started because something was published inadvertently.
No, this thread started
On 23/08/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
I've also updated the Japanese and French NL pages. The Italian and
Spanish pages seem to be hooked into the same Javascript we use on the
main download page, so I'm hoping they will point to the 3.4.1 release
automatically when we push the updates to that script.
Rob Weir wrote:
I agree that we should have some mention of other versions or
distributions that are based on AOO code, even if they are not
strictly ports. The question is where to mention them?
So far only winPenPack showed up, so for version 3.4.1 it seems natural
to just use the
Kay Schenk wrote:
We can leave the porting page as is with winPenPack on it, and just
see what happens. But I guarantee that based on comments on
comments/questions we've already had over the past year, we will
basically be obliged to list every other distributor that also feels
they have
Rob Weir wrote:
Forwarded with permission of the author. I corrected the English
version. Translators should take note.
I've just made a couple of other translation-relevant fixes to
http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/development/releases/3.4.1.html :
- Mention portable versions
- Remove
Kay Schenk wrote:
So, I think the second column on the porting page should be removed
entirely. I feel winPenPack is a distribution and not a port, and
therefore this would go as well. (I need to look again to see how/why
this was even suggested). I think we would take on an incredible amount
of
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
- who isn't aware of the consequences of her/his changes
(do you all know that a change on a NL webpage will also
publish everything else in staging?)
Yes, and I consider it a bug (an inconvenience, say). But anyway, the
most reasonable option to me is preparing the full
Rob Weir wrote:
Everyone in the community is encouraged to vote. Votes from PPMC
members and Mentors are binding. This vote will run 72-hours.
[ ] +1 Apache OpenOffice community is ready to graduate from the
Apache Incubator.
[ ] +0 Don't care.
[ ] -1 Apache OpenOffice community is not ready
Dave Fisher wrote:
We were supposed to wait to publish.
Author: pescetti
Date: Sun Aug 19 15:08:26 2012
New Revision: 829379
What did I publish? If it was only (like the diff showed)
http://www.openoffice.org/it/stampa/comunicati/aoo341.html
then it's OK to have it online. It's not linked and
On 17/08/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
We've had several prods from our mentors suggesting that we are ready
to graduate.
I agree it would be good to do so, since it will automatically reduce
complex and unclear terminology (incubator, podling) that has been
misused outside the project and it will
On 15/08/2012 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1
(incubating).
+1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating)
This is based on tests on the binary packages by me and other community
members from the ooo-progetto-it mailing
On 17/08/2012 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
On 17.08.2012 10:06, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
On 17.08.2012 10:02, Huaidong Qiu wrote:
I am working on a writer number enhancement, to support a new ODF
attribute
List Level for paragraph style
[1]
Li Feng Wang wrote:
I wrote a Wiki about TestLink Usage Guide,
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/TestLink
Hope to help you use TestLink.
Thanks, very good information. A couple of remarks:
1) Can testcases be translated? Of course one can create a scenario
where, say, all tests are
On 16/08/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Kevin Grignon wrote:
I've been looking at various survey tools and would like to recommend that
we deploy the open source survey tool, *LimeSurvey.*
Perfect. It is a good tool and it is in continuity with what the project
used
On 15/08/2012 Dave Fisher wrote:
On Aug 14, 2012, at 8:09 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Ready at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5144
I'll look into this one tomorrow. There will be two parts.
(1) DNS redirect to www.openoffice.org
(2) httpd.conf rewrite to redirect to thankyou.html
On 16/08/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=announcing_apache_openoffice_3_4
Comments are welcome.
I had a quick look about 24 hours ago and the text seemed fine. But I
cannot access the URL now (well, I can, but I only see the Apache
OpenOffice
On 16/08/2012 Dave Fisher wrote:
Yes.
# change users.services.openoffice.org/... to forum.openoffice.org/...
RewriteCond ${lowercase:%{HTTP_HOST}} ^users\.services\.openoffice\.org$
RewriteRule ^users\.services\.openoffice\.org/(.*)
http://forum.openoffice.org/$1 [NE,L,R=permanent]
On 14/08/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
http://www.openoffice.org/stats/ooo-dev-subscribers.html
and
http://www.openoffice.org/stats/committers.html
Nice! The first one has a few incorrect references to Committers in
the page title tag and in the chart axis. But for the rest it's very
good and it
On 14/08/2012 RGB ES wrote:
2012/8/14 RGB ES:
Good! But I'm finding a weird behaviour on the forums... If I enter on
the old url
http://user.services.openoffice.org/
I'm NOT redirected. If I open bot, the new and the old address and
log-in in the new, in the old one I'm still logged off
I
On 09/08/2012 Dave Fisher wrote:
On Aug 7, 2012, at 2:44 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
I created a page with this content at
http://www.openoffice.org/legacy/thankyou.html If we have lazy
consensus (i.e., no objections in 72 hours or so) on this, I'll
then proceed and ask Infra to redirect all
On 12/08/2012 Phil Hocott wrote:
Since I downloaded the apache version of open office my spelling and
gramer doesn't work properly so I found an old copy of open office
3.1.0 and downloaded it and everything is fine.
This is a quite radical solution: version 3.1.0 is really old and misses
imacat wrote:
Well, see the attachment. ^_*'
Nice! And interesting too (yes, the guy purportedly did everything by
hand, pixel by pixel, see the explanation video link sent by Rob).
So there is definitely room for a contest or a conference presentation
about this...
Regards,
Andrea.
(answering below so that Paolo gets all context; he is not subscribed so
CC him if relevant)
On 10/08/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
If you don't know this guy's work you should really check it out. He
has over 2 million YouTube subscribers. It is hard to describe, but
I'd say it is 1/3 one-man band,
Pedro Domínguez wrote:
I have updated the openoffice from 3.3 to 3.4 version and now I can't
spell check my documents.
I have four servers with windows 2003 server, here is where the users
connect to the OO, with a movil profile. With the older version (3.3)
never had a problem with this, while
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
On 07.08.2012 23:44, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
I created a page with this content at
http://www.openoffice.org/legacy/thankyou.html
May be we can use it also for our update service. It could be the
landing page for users of legacy OOo versions for whose language we
Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
wrote:
Please don't mix frequent building on regular basis with what has been
happening here the last weeks. There have been two, three, RC build
proposal in the same week. The most notorious is the build announced on
Monday
On 05/08/2012 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 27/07/2012 Peter Pöml wrote:
download.services.openoffice.org to redirect to
openoffice.mirrorbrain.org
OK, I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5118 to make
this temporary redirection permanent (at DNS level). ...
I assume
On 23/07/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
So I'd propose to ask Infra to redirect the whole domains
https://registration2.services.openoffice.org/
http://registration2.services.openoffice.org/
http://survey.services.openoffice.org/
to something
Rob Weir wrote:
So to make this easier for me next time, and for anyone else, I
created a table on the wiki of our open Infrastructure JIRA issues:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Open+Infrastructure+Requests
... Also, feel free to add any other open issues.
I added a
Donald Harbison wrote:
Andrea, I hope that you submit a proposal for a talk. We need the
impressive Italian community to represent key aspects of the proejct and
participate at ApacheCon Europe.
It's quite likely that I will propose a talk (not necessary on a topic
related to OpenOffice in
On 27/07/2012 Peter Pöml wrote:
Am 27.07.2012 um 09:32 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
I was about to ask Infra to redirect
http://download.services.openoffice.org to
http://openoffice.mirrorbrain.org but it seems it's already done.
It seems it's already done because, this morning, I configured
On 17/07/2012 RGB ES wrote:
2012/7/17 Andrea Pescetti:
RGB ES wrote:
Most of the time, a corrupted user profile prevents AOO from starting
so I do not think an item on any menu will help. A fail safe mode
that run when a crash is detected (or two crashes in a row?) will be
more useful
On 03/08/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 6:13 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
wrote:
I am planning to give a talk on ApacheCon EU about
the update function in AOO and the Update Service. In this talk I will give
a deep insight in its purpose and functionality which should be enough input
On 25/07/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
If possible, I'd like to also replace our Announcing Apache
OpenOffice 3.4 header link on ooo-site with one linking to this blog
post, once published. We can let that run for the next week or so
Thanks, the pages under /it now have a translated version of the
On 17/07/2012 Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2012-07-17 1:15 AM Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
I agree in general to you and thanks for summarizing this topic. I have
only one point to add, why should we mention potential problems that we
can't reproduce? In this case I would not mention it, it would be
On 16/07/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
An interesting approach:
http://javaadventure.blogspot.ie/2012/07/do-you-want-to-become-maven-committer.html
I wonder if we could do something similar? Maybe with QA or Translation?
For it to work we'd need to commitment of several committers willing
to be
Moving the request below to ooo-dev since it is probably too technical
for ooo-users. Please replay to ooo-dev and Karsten, the original poster.
On 23/07/2012 Karsten Burger wrote:
Hello,
I found this guarantee for oneway calls:
http://www.openoffice.org/udk/common/man/uno.html
sequence of
On 31/07/2012 drew wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 14:36 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
Community members are also working on BSD, Solaris and OS/2 ports,
with plans to release these outside of Apache. ...
I think there is some logic to mentioning them in the
release announcement. But work that happens
Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
We cannot do maintainance for broken links here. Perhaps we should
remind users to report broken links on the originating websites.
Certainly we can fix this on our end. In fact I just did:
Rob Weir wrote:
Google is reporting a 404 error for this URL:
http://www.openoffice.org/security/bulletin-20060629.html
...
The Wayback Machine shows the page did exist in 2006:
http://web.archive.org/web/20060703040511/http://www.openoffice.org/security/bulletin-20060629.html
But it was broken
Des wrote:
I have lost all of my login details to go onto the Open Office site, password
user name.
Can you please tell me how I can get this matter resolved
All accounts have been disabled or converted with the infrastructure
migration to the Apache servers. But this doesn't mean, of
On 26/07/2012 Kay Schenk wrote:
Re -- security bug fixes. I know we did the older CVE-2012-0037 with
patches to Windows and Mac. But we weren't able to deal with a Linux
patch as I recall. (I don't know what progress has been made on that front).
For the record, Ariel provided a procedure to
On 27/07/2012 Peter Pöml wrote:
I have configured a HTTP redirect to my replacement server
on .mirrorbrain.org now. I hope that helps you.
Thanks Peter, this helps a lot! Whatever we replace in the
openoffice.org HTML pages, there's a huge number of links out there
pointing to
Kay Schenk wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=78242
FWIW -- I did basically close this with resolved and unreproducible.
Oh boy...getting mixed between Jira and BZ. BZ has no CLOSE, only RESOLVED,
which is somewhat misleading.
You can set issues to CLOSED in BugZilla, but,
Guy Waterval wrote:
2012/7/22 drew
The other packager was:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/winpenpack/
again I would not be surprised to see them update soon also.
WinPenPack has just updated their site: they are now offering a live
or portable version of Apache OpenOffice 3.4 called
Updating dictionaries from the Extensions site to their latest version
should probably be (or become) part of the standard pre-release actions,
like updating localizations: it is a low-risk fix that fits with the
concept of maintenance releases.
Unfortunately, we haven't done that step for
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
In general I agree that we should test new versions of dictionaries and
should integrate them in the next upcoming release.
But we should do that in time and not in the last minute.
OK, let's remember to put it in our schedule for next releases; or let's
just agree to
On 16/07/2012 21:14, sebb wrote:
On 16 July 2012 19:01, Rob Weir wrote:
The registration URL's for OOo 3.3 look like this:
https://registration2.services.openoffice.org/RegistrationWeb/register/GUID?prduct=OpenOffice.orglocale=encid-926117
So we should be able to handle this entirely with ASF.
On 21/07/2012 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
there was a
quite prominent warning on the download page last time I checked (it
seems
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+Unofficial+Developer+Snapshots
is temporarily unavailable at the moment).
Correcting myself: the page
On 05/07/2012 Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
I guess this is one of those registrymodifications.xcu bugs.
We may think of having a page with Known bugs, their workarounds,
information about a possible fix in a next release, etc.
So far there is only one bug which stands out, and it is indeed the
On 20/07/2012 Clarence GUO wrote:
Then how can I fix this defect? It seems the only way is to change the
standard and change the corresponding filter code. But I know change the
standard is not easy...
It is not easy, but not impossible either. See these resources where you
can see that
By chance (a link found in a discussion about OpenOffice dictionaries in
the Mozilla Bugzilla) I came across a link to
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=64400
(mentioned in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=355178#c3 )
The issue page looks completely empty, even though it
RGB ES wrote:
2012/7/21 floris v:
I just downloaded and installed the latest developer snapshot/build and
found that it replaces the stable version.
I think that that was on purpose: we are really close to 3.4.1 release
so it's time to test install issues.
Exactly, it was discussed earlier
Rob Weir wrote:
http://www.openoffice.org/pl/
there is some CSS issue causing the text to be white-on-white or
something.
I stared at it but did not see the source of the problem.
The source of the problem is the first non-comment line here:
http://www.openoffice.org/css/ooo.css
body {
Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
If I enter AA, I would expect it to be #AA, that is, zeros added at
the left.
AA - AA - RBG 0,0,170
but the color picker shows RGB 170,170,170 ...
Which should be the expected behaviour?
What I would expect is:
ABC - AABBCC
This is the (unnatural for
Risto Jääskeläinen wrote:
Supposing that quickstarter is working without any faults there is still
a time stealing hiding in it. Those users who use OpenOffice only once
and while lost a bit their working time every day they start their
computer and not use use OpenOffice at that session.
Yes,
Hagar Delest wrote:
You've taken the fun out of it. ...
As a consequence, I resign from my PPMC role and will unsubscribe the
dev private mailing lists right now.
It's a very sad (hopefully temporary) consequence.
It proves that the OpenOffice project is not mature yet: it can still
happen
On 17/07/2012 Alexandro Colorado wrote:
+1 I agree however like Rob say, would be good to stablish a new proposal
on eventually refresh this list. I think the list has its value as a
concept.
I agree with the principle of removing the consultants list, but the
page itself
Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
I've kept in touch with what is going on. But my interest is in
learning what you have to say and would have me say.
Assuming you are already familiar with all topics you listed (and of
course you are!) I'd say the numbers Rob gave already provide solid
facts on
Rob Weir wrote:
Since this seems to be such a common solution, I wonder if we should
add this directly to the product? Something like a Help menu item, or
Help/Support menu for reset profile on restart or something like
that.
This would be a fantastic addition and would make support much
le arrivera' e dal quel momento
ricevera' tutte le richieste di supporto e potra' ovviamente inviarne a
sua volta.
Se ci fossero ulteriori problemi, siamo a disposizione sui canali indicati.
Distinti saluti,
Andrea Pescetti.
RGB ES wrote:
Most of the time, a corrupted user profile prevents AOO from starting
so I do not think an item on any menu will help. A fail safe mode
that run when a crash is detected (or two crashes in a row?) will be
more useful... is it something like that possible?
I actually meant the
On 18/07/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
Well supposedly problems with it have been fixed, but quickstarter does
seem to have its issues. ...
Maybe this is worth a performance test, to see whether QuickStart
really is quick, and by how much?
Besides
Hagar Delest wrote:
Le jeu. 12 juil. 2012 21:19:50 CEST, Joe Schaefer
a écrit :
Hagar is a committer, that comes both with certain rights and certain
responsibilities, the latter of which is to not bother others with work
he can carry out effectively himself.
Don't tell me that since I'm a
101 - 200 of 560 matches
Mail list logo
