Hi,
I logged a bug related to weblayout issue with 3.4. I have got the basic code
to make it to weblyaout. Does anybody has equivalent java code to resolve it.
Below is the bug and response details.
Thanks,
Anna
Need document to open in weblayout mode however it is opening in printlayout
the download link to Java entirely.
Why? Well there are at least 2 versions of Java which may be of
interest to
our user base --
Oracle Java. and OpenJDK.
Given the discussion in the thread referenced above, our other page with
information on java,
http://www.openoffice.org/**download/common
be
different if we couldn't fix the problem. But we simply can't
reproduce it.
Check how many times this problem has been reported on the users forum.
The collective wisdom of all the people giving support for windows is to
use Java 1.6 32 bit. I don't use Windows but I recall that many of the
reported
Am 16.07.2012 23:53, Kay Schenk wrote:
Re this thread: http://markmail.org/message/uzs5bu3r5oby2fza
I did indeed remove the download link to Java entirely.
Why? Well there are at least 2 versions of Java which may be of interest to
our user base --
Oracle Java. and OpenJDK.
Given
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
At any rate, no reported issues with Mac and Oracle java 1.6 except for
initial setup issues -- can't find the JRE.
Then one would think that the code that looks if a JRE is installed
needs some work, no?.
I mean, how
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
So we look if java executable can
be installed,
Sorry, I meant we look if a java executable can be executed.
FC
Am 04.08.2012 18:14, Andreas Säger wrote:
Am 16.07.2012 23:53, Kay Schenk wrote:
Re this thread: http://markmail.org/message/uzs5bu3r5oby2fza
I did indeed remove the download link to Java entirely.
Why? Well there are at least 2 versions of Java which may be of
interest to
our user base
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 19:30:56 +0530
suhail ansari suhaila...@gmail.com wrote:
OpenOffice should be rewritten in JavaFX
Identical post to one from same poster on 5th July 2012.
--
Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie
On 7/16/12 11:53 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
Re this thread: http://markmail.org/message/uzs5bu3r5oby2fza
I did indeed remove the download link to Java entirely.
Why? Well there are at least 2 versions of Java which may be of interest to
our user base --
Oracle Java. and OpenJDK.
Given
. But we simply can't reproduce it.
Check how many times this problem has been reported on the users forum. The collective wisdom
of all the people giving support for windows is to use Java 1.6 32 bit. I don't use Windows but
I recall that many of the reported problems were on new installations
? In this case I would not mention it, it would be
different if we couldn't fix the problem. But we simply can't reproduce
it.
Check how many times this problem has been reported on the users forum.
The collective wisdom of all the people giving support for windows is to
use Java 1.6 32 bit. I don't use
the people giving support for windows is to
use Java 1.6 32 bit. I don't use Windows but I recall that many of the
reported problems were on new installations of OpenOffice.
--
__**___
Larry I. Gusaas
Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada
Website: http://larry-gusaas.com
On Jul 17, 2012, at 12:15 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 7/16/12 11:53 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
Re this thread: http://markmail.org/message/uzs5bu3r5oby2fza
I did indeed remove the download link to Java entirely.
Why? Well there are at least 2 versions of Java which may be of interest to
our
Re this thread: http://markmail.org/message/uzs5bu3r5oby2fza
I did indeed remove the download link to Java entirely.
Why? Well there are at least 2 versions of Java which may be of interest to
our user base --
Oracle Java. and OpenJDK.
Given the discussion in the thread referenced above, our
- Original Message -
From: Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 7:25 PM
Subject: Re: Java download link on AOO site
Hi Hagar,
[...]
I don't have the time to learn another system again (as some have
correctly
tricks.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Joe Schaefer [mailto:joe_schae...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2012 10:58
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Java download link on AOO site
[ ... ]
You write documentation largely as a means of self-defense so people
will read
makes no difference
to anyoneif only a select few areexpectedto even try.
- Original Message -
From: Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; 'Joe Schaefer' joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2012 2:49 PM
Subject: RE: Java download
orcnote comment=below /
-Original Message-
From: Joe Schaefer [mailto:joe_schae...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2012 12:00
To: dennis.hamil...@acm.org; ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Java download link on AOO site
The thing is Dennis, it is self-defeating for the org
...@yahoo.com; ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2012 4:00 PM
Subject: RE: Java download link on AOO site
orcnote comment=below /
-Original Message-
From: Joe Schaefer [mailto:joe_schae...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2012 12:00
To: dennis.hamil
@incubator.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org
Subject: Re: Java download link on AOO site
There is an interesting dialectic here between acting with enlightened
self-interest and being entirely selfish. All I have suggested throughout
this episode is that the project be egalitarian towards its website
, but to discuss it with an aim towards improvement. That's all
I've tried to do here.
- Original Message -
From: Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; 'Joe Schaefer' joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2012 5:40 PM
Subject: RE: Java
in much of this though.
- Original Message -
From: Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; 'Joe Schaefer' joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2012 5:40 PM
Subject: RE: Java download link on AOO site
I think the situation would
. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; 'Joe Schaefer' joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2012 5:40 PM
Subject: RE: Java download link on AOO site
I think the situation would have been different if the web site were
being
created from scratch
that the download link to Java
points
to the 1.7 version (Get the most recent Java (JRE):
http://java.com/en/download/**manual.jsp
http://java.com/en/download/manual.jsp).
We should point to a 1.6 version to avoid problems with Java 1.7 and
AOO:
http://java.com/en/download/**manual_v6.jsp
Le sam. 14 juil. 2012 01:25:55 CEST, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net a
écrit :
BTW - Kay has picked up what the real topic you brought here was, and this is
something that is much more for discussion than it is something to simply
change.
Yes, thanks, I had seen it but completely forgot to
, Hagar Delest
hagar.del...@laposte.net
wrote:
It has been noticed by a forum user that the download link to Java
points
to the 1.7 version (Get the most recent Java (JRE):
http://java.com/en/download/**manual.jsp
http://java.com/en/download/manual.jsp).
We should point to a 1.6 version
On 2012-07-14 5:48 PM Kay Schenk wrote:
I think the above bug you cited is not a java 1.6 vs 1.7 issue, It's a
can't find java issue. I will do some more research tomorrow to see if
there is a really a java 1.6 vs java 1.7 issue. I do remember seeing
complaints about not being able to find
On 7/12/12 9:44 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Jul 12, 2012, at 12:04 PM, Hagar Delest wrote:
Le jeu. 12 juil. 2012 00:39:17 CEST, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com a
écrit :
Why does Hagar need an agent to carry this out? Isn't
Hagar a committer and therefore can't he edit the page
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Hagar Delest hagar.del...@laposte.netwrote:
It has been noticed by a forum user that the download link to Java points
to the 1.7 version (Get the most recent Java (JRE):
http://java.com/en/download/**manual.jsphttp://java.com/en/download/manual.jsp).
We should
On Jul 13, 2012, at 10:45 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Hagar Delest hagar.del...@laposte.netwrote:
It has been noticed by a forum user that the download link to Java points
to the 1.7 version (Get the most recent Java (JRE):
http://java.com/en/download
Hi Kay,
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:45:18AM -0700, Kay Schenk wrote:
ummm...two things on this...
-- there was quite a long discussion on Java 7 that started in Jan.
and ultimately resulted in this post on June 19 from Ariel re Java
7 stating that using java 7 didn't seem to cause issues
Am 13.07.2012 19:45, Kay Schenk wrote:
ummm...two things on this...
-- there was quite a long discussion on Java 7 that started in Jan. and
ultimately resulted in this post on June 19 from Ariel re Java 7 stating
that using java 7 didn't seem to cause issues
http://markmail.org/thread
there was a nasty bug** that caused segfaults on the VM under
very precise circumstances. Then it was fixed by the time of the Java
7 Update 2 release. And now Java 7 is up to version J7u5 (Java 7
Update 5).
So, when you say Java 7 what build of Java 7 do you mean? it' s
quite possible that those reports
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Andreas Säger ville...@t-online.dewrote:
Am 13.07.2012 19:45, Kay Schenk wrote:
ummm...two things on this...
-- there was quite a long discussion on Java 7 that started in Jan. and
ultimately resulted in this post on June 19 from Ariel re Java 7 stating
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jul 13, 2012, at 10:45 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Hagar Delest hagar.del...@laposte.net
wrote:
It has been noticed by a forum user that the download link to Java
points
Le ven. 13 juil. 2012 07:01:58 CEST, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com a
écrit :
The biggest problem with this project is the prevalence of people who
are unskilled in the codebase occupying all the oxygen on the dev list.
This list, unlike the forums, is about project development, and
Hi Hagar,
BTW - Kay has picked up what the real topic you brought here was, and this is
something that is much more for discussion than it is something to simply
change.
On Jul 13, 2012, at 3:54 PM, Hagar Delest wrote:
Le ven. 13 juil. 2012 07:01:58 CEST, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Le jeu. 12 juil. 2012 00:39:17 CEST, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com a
écrit :
Why does Hagar need an agent to carry this out? Isn't
Hagar a committer and therefore can't he edit the page
himself with the CMS?
JFDI Hagar. This does not need discussion unless you require
more
On 2012-07-12 1:06 PM Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Hagar Delest hagar.del...@laposte.net
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 3:04 PM
Subject: Re: Java download link on AOO site
Le jeu. 12 juil. 2012 00:39:17 CEST, Joe Schaefer
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Why does Hagar need an agent to carry this out?
apparently he also needs someone to lecture him!.
Wow, this is scary. I will never be a commiter if this includes
someone else bossing you around publicly on mailing
- Original Message -
From: Larry Gusaas larry.gus...@gmail.com
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 3:14 PM
Subject: Re: Java download link on AOO site
On 2012-07-12 1:06 PM Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Hagar Delest
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Thanks for your findings. This should be indeed changed as long the Office
cannot handle the lastest and greatest JRE version.
I' m curious about this bug. I have OpenJDK 7 installed on my system
and I didn' t notice a
On 07/12/2012 09:18 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Why does Hagar need an agent to carry this out?
apparently he also needs someone to lecture him!.
Wow, this is scary. I will never be a commiter if this includes
Am 12.07.2012 21:22, schrieb Fernando Cassia:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Thanks for your findings. This should be indeed changed as long the Office
cannot handle the lastest and greatest JRE version.
I' m curious about this bug. I have OpenJDK 7
On Jul 12, 2012, at 12:04 PM, Hagar Delest wrote:
Le jeu. 12 juil. 2012 00:39:17 CEST, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com a
écrit :
Why does Hagar need an agent to carry this out? Isn't
Hagar a committer and therefore can't he edit the page
himself with the CMS?
JFDI Hagar. This
, of course also a way to get it changed. Why not. ;-)
Marcus
- Original Message -
From: Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 6:34 PM
Subject: Re: Java download link on AOO site
Am 07/11/2012 11:22 PM, schrieb Hagar Delest
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Let's not consider his short messages encouraging people to be anything
negative. It is more like encouraging someone to dive into the pool for the
first time.
Sometimes, the tone makes all the difference. A ' please
Le jeu. 12 juil. 2012 21:19:50 CEST, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com a
écrit :
On 2012-07-12 1:06 PM Joe Schaefer wrote:
1) No it's not a requirement that you be a committer to be on the PPMC.
Then it was for the Roller blog account I guess.
2) What sort of example do you hope to
Hagar Delest wrote:
Le jeu. 12 juil. 2012 21:19:50 CEST, Joe Schaefer
a écrit :
Hagar is a committer, that comes both with certain rights and certain
responsibilities, the latter of which is to not bother others with work
he can carry out effectively himself.
Don't tell me that since I'm a
, despite his attitude
towards it.
- Original Message -
From: Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: Java download link on AOO site
Hagar Delest wrote:
Le jeu. 12 juil. 2012 21:19:50 CEST, Joe
On 2012-07-12 3:48 PM Joe Schaefer wrote:
Hello? Is this thing on? This project has a whopping
9GB website that all of maybe 5 people on the planet
know how to takecare of, and it is rife with stale
information inherited from a different past. The website
is a*community* resource and that
- this IS the apache way. We are not alone on a
project and yes, you can ask other people to help you.
Cheers,
- Original Message -
From: Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: Java download link on AOO
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Joe, your tone is extremely rude and insulting. You want people to
learn/change something? Nobody wants to hear it that way. You wrote it
is Anti-Apache to not use the CMS. I consider it Anti-Apache the way
you
- Original Message -
From: Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 11:59 PM
Subject: Re: Java download link on AOO site
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Hello
On 2012-07-12 11:01 PM Joe Schaefer wrote:
This list, unlike the forums, is about project development, and teaching
others to behave in productive ways by*demonstrating* the behavior
you want to see from others here.
Why don't you look in the bloody mirror. You are demonstrating how to be an
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Joe, your tone is extremely rude and insulting. You want people to
learn/change something? Nobody wants to hear it that way. You wrote it
is Anti-Apache to not use the CMS. I consider it Anti-Apache the way
you write
It has been noticed by a forum user that the download link to Java points to
the 1.7 version (Get the most recent Java (JRE):
http://java.com/en/download/manual.jsp ).
We should point to a 1.6 version to avoid problems with Java 1.7 and AOO:
http://java.com/en/download/manual_v6.jsp
Link
Am 07/11/2012 11:22 PM, schrieb Hagar Delest:
It has been noticed by a forum user that the download link to Java
points to the 1.7 version (Get the most recent Java (JRE):
http://java.com/en/download/manual.jsp ).
We should point to a 1.6 version to avoid problems with Java 1.7 and
AOO: http
) marcus.m...@wtnet.de
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 6:34 PM
Subject: Re: Java download link on AOO site
Am 07/11/2012 11:22 PM, schrieb Hagar Delest:
It has been noticed by a forum user that the download link to Java
points to the 1.7 version (Get the most
Hi Andreas,
On 07.07.2012 17:36, Andreas Säger wrote:
Am 06.07.2012 16:26, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) wrote:
In addtion, the very important AOO scripting framework is totally Java based.
Why can I run all non-Java macros on a machine with no Java?
not sure, what you are after.
AFAIK
Am 06.07.2012 16:26, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) wrote:
In addtion, the very important AOO scripting framework is totally Java based.
Why can I run all non-Java macros on a machine with no Java?
itself to a weekend rewrite
into FlashFX, but the idea of a Java ODF viewer that can work with
OpenOffice has some merit.
I am partial to folding doors on the bikeshed and I do not care what colour
it is.
-Wolf
--
This Apt Has Super Cow Powers - http://sourcefreedom.com
Open-Source Software
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Wolf Halton wolf.hal...@gmail.com wrote:
The technical complexity of AOO doesn't lend itself to a weekend rewrite
into FlashFX, but the idea of a Java ODF viewer that can work with
OpenOffice has some merit.
Yes, and that was my idea. ;))
FC
PS: Also agree we
On 05.07.2012 22:04, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2012 um 19:57 schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
... cut ...
3. Are you aware that the tendency is to remove Java dependencies from
OpenOffice? I don't know the reasoning, but it is happening.
AFAICT there was quite an anti-Java
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:41 PM, suhail ansari suhaila...@gmail.com wrote:
A Java spin-off of AOO written in Java on the other hand, starting
from scratch, would be good. Call it AOO-Lite.
That's actually a pretty
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Phillip Rhodes
motley.crue@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:41 PM, suhail ansari suhaila...@gmail.com wrote:
A Java spin-off of AOO written in Java on the other hand
@Rony,
I have no intention to bash Java.
However, the ability to support extensions and scripting including optional
reliance on a JVM hosting is not the same as reworking AOOi as Java-hosted
software. In fact, it is no longer to have a JVM to install AOOi (or
LibreOffice) and JREs
Hi Dennis,
On Jul 6, 2012, at 10:57 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
@Rony,
I have no intention to bash Java.
However, the ability to support extensions and scripting including optional
reliance on a JVM hosting is not the same as reworking AOOi as Java-hosted
software. In fact
do today with Java6+ APIs and Java
WebStart. I often point out at http://ho.io/muCommander as an example
of how a properly done Java-based app can be, that can be launched via
JWS (try loading http://tinyurl.com/launchMUC from any system with
Java enabled and JWS properly configured and see what I
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
No longer providing a JRE is more about the maturity and ubiquity of JVMs on
consumer OSs.
Yes, packaging JREs along with apps is a capital sin in Java
development. It goes back to the days of the slightly incompatible
JavaFX has a very restrictive licencse and is pretty heavy, I don't
see any advantage in transcribing OOo from C++ to Java. Plus the
performance hit will be huge since Java is much slower than C++.
On 7/5/12, Wolf Halton wolf.hal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:59 AM, suhail ansari
Hello;
--- Mer 4/7/12, suhail ansari suhaila...@gmail.com ha scritto:
...
OpenOffice should be rewritten in
JavaFX.
OpenOffice is simply too big to propose rewriting it all
to a different language.
Plus, some modern platforms don't want Java at all :(.
Pedro.
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:59 AM, suhail ansari suhaila...@gmail.com wrote:
OpenOffice should be rewritten in JavaFX.
Why do you think it has to be a zero-sum game?. rewritten in implies
abandoning the previous code.
I, instead, think a Java-based (whether JavaFX or not, I'll leave
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Plus, some modern platforms don't want Java at all :(.
Ther's an OpenJDK port for the Nokia N9.
That's modern in my book.
I guess that by modern you mean locked platforms. That's not
progress nor modern, in my book.
FC
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Plus, some modern platforms don't want Java at all :(.
Ther's an OpenJDK port for the Nokia N9.
That's modern in my book.
I guess that by modern
There are already open-source Java-based viewers for some level of ODF support.
A few run on Android, for example.
These are not browser-installed though.
Perhaps you would like to connect with one of those developments and see how
easy it is, or is not, to use via JavaFX or an equivalent
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 7:09 PM, suhail ansari suhaila...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Plus, some modern platforms don't want Java at all :(.
Ther's an OpenJDK
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:41 PM, suhail ansari suhaila...@gmail.com wrote:
One major
reason to rewrite OpenOffice in Java because Java support many languages
(Scala, Jython, JRuby)
You clearly have no idea of the effort required to rewrite everything
in AOO in Java. I would vote against
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:41 PM, suhail ansari suhaila...@gmail.com wrote:
. It will be easier to support a Java based OpenOffice due to
Java's cross platform nature.
A Java spin-off of AOO written in Java on the other hand, starting
from scratch, would be good. Call it AOO-Lite.
But better yet
Hi;
--- Gio 5/7/12, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com ha scritto:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
wrote:
Plus, some modern platforms don't want Java at all :(.
Ther's an OpenJDK port for the Nokia N9.
That's modern in my book.
I guess that by modern you
their attention to a different approach?
3. Are you aware that the tendency is to remove Java dependencies
from OpenOffice? I don't know the reasoning, but it is happening.
really, I don't see it at AOO at the moment. I still recommend Java for
extensions because it's much easier to develop
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Hi;
--- Gio 5/7/12, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com ha scritto:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org
wrote:
Plus, some modern platforms don't want Java at all :(.
Ther's an OpenJDK port
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote:
, GPL is not compatible with Apache license.
Nobody is speaking about integrating OpenJDK or OpenJFX into the AOO
source, or integrating the AOO source into OJFX.
AFAIK the license of the runtime and the license of the VM
Hello Maya,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 07:18:55AM -0700, Maya Cain wrote:
Thank you, Ariel and Andrew
I think I tried that already but will try again ... and which list
should I subscribe to so that I get replies? ... haven't had to
deal with this stuff for awhile so I'm confused
On 06/19/2012 12:29 PM, Maya Cain wrote:
I had an older copy of OpenOffice which ran very well but then I found
there was a newer version and so I updated and now my database will not
work. I get a message saying that the Java environment has changed. The
text function and the spreadsheets
Hi All,
I has refactored GUI testing library from Symphony. Did some changes
to make it more easily to use. Now it's ready to migrate it to trunk.
Bug 119998 has been created to track the task.
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119998
All code is included in the attached zip file.
Sub Main
o = createUnoService(com.sun.star.loader.Java2)
msgbox o.dbg_supportedinterfaces
End Sub
got this:
...loader.XImplementationLoader
...lang.XServiceInfo
...lang.XTypeProvider
...uno.XWeak
I tried the same code in windows and I got the same answer.
What can I check now?
it will
Hi,
I'm working to get java supported also in the OS/2 build. I have
already adapted jvmfwk and other parts to recognize OS/2 JVM. Now AOO
can detect the JVM and even start an instance (according to logs).
But I cannot get wizards to show or db tables editor; AOO simply
ignores the menu
On 6/1/12 3:39 PM, Yuri Dario wrote:
Hi,
I'm working to get java supported also in the OS/2 build. I have
already adapted jvmfwk and other parts to recognize OS/2 JVM. Now AOO
can detect the JVM and even start an instance (according to logs).
But I cannot get wizards to show or db
and I'm pretty sure that I've installed
my extension correctly.
I cannot reproduce it, and I'm also sure I installed the extension
correctly, it is working.
Your project is made up of two pieces:
- an AOO extension, works inside AOO
- a Java application, that bootstraps AOO, that is a client
Hi Andor,
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 03:41:08PM +, Andor E wrote:
I'm not sure, how this can be a bug in my code.
I don't mean a bug *in* your code, I mean a bug *with* your Java
application in the environment you are testing it.
The very same code runs fine with OOo 3.2.1 and OOo 3.3
2012/5/14 Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org:
Hello Andor;
Hello Andor, Pedro
--- Lun 14/5/12, Andor E eymux2...@googlemail.com ha scritto:
...
Data: Lunedì 14 maggio 2012, 08:35
Hi,
I have just started to test AO 3.4 with our extension
(WollMux) and ran into trouble right at the start. One
tries to instantiate its main form, it throws a java.awt.HeadlessException.
It's also supposed to launch an invisible Writer document. The launching
works, but the window is visible.
Needless to say, this works with OOo 3.2.1/3.3.
Has anything changed in the way JAVA is launched
also supposed to launch an invisible Writer document. The launching
works, but the window is visible.
Needless to say, this works with OOo 3.2.1/3.3.
Has anything changed in the way JAVA is launched or in the bootstrapping
mechanism? I couldn't find anything on this in the release notes. Also
Hello,
--- Mar 15/5/12, Roberto Resoli roberto.res...@gmail.com ha scritto:
...
2012/5/14 Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org:
Hello Andor;
Hello Andor, Pedro
--- Lun 14/5/12, Andor E eymux2...@googlemail.com
ha scritto:
...
Data: Lunedì 14 maggio 2012, 08:35
Hi,
I have just started
Hi,
I'm not sure but perhaps it's an issue related to the QuickStarter
mechanism because the source code within WollMux want's to access this?
Perhaps buxfix
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1338503 is related
to this issue? What does line 450 in
2012/5/15 Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org:
Hello,
...
what is used of Tomcat for inside AOO? Do you mean the
entire Tomcat API or
the Servlet part only? I tried to find some info about
this, having
found Tomcat update
notice inside AOO 3.4 release notes. Cold you point me to
some
On 05/15/12 07:23, Roberto Resoli wrote:
2012/5/15 Pedro Giffunip...@apache.org:
Hello,
...
what is used of Tomcat for inside AOO? Do you mean the
entire Tomcat API or
the Servlet part only? I tried to find some info about
this, having
found Tomcat update
notice inside AOO 3.4 release notes.
also sure I installed the extension
correctly, it is working.
Your project is made up of two pieces:
- an AOO extension, works inside AOO
- a Java application, that bootstraps AOO, that is a client application
Looking at the backtrace:
2012-05-14 14:08:25 ERROR(WollMuxBar:450
.
It's also supposed to launch an invisible Writer document. The launching
works, but the window is visible.
Needless to say, this works with OOo 3.2.1/3.3.
Has anything changed in the way JAVA is launched or in the bootstrapping
mechanism? I couldn't find anything on this in the release notes. Also
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
