carry out the testmethod
552 *-* test~execute(testResult, verbose)
552 *-* test~execute(testResult, verbose)
46 *-* testResult = group~suite~execute~~print
Test execution: 00:00:02.273000
---rony
On 08.06.2020 14:24, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 20
On 08.06.2020 14:24, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 8:06 AM Rony G. Flatscher <mailto:rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at>> wrote:
>
> On 08.06.2020 13:39, Rick McGuire wrote:
>> My incubator version has named captures, and also has a new feature
s recursively used)
with a single pattern?
What would you suggest to study first in order to understand what you have
created so far?
---rony
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 7:16 AM Rony G. Flatscher <mailto:rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at>> wrote:
>
> Just an interesting mail thr
implemented in such an extension library, of course, so a little bit of a
chicken-egg problem there).
---rony
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: PCRE2 10.35 for z/OS
Date: 7 Jun 2020 07:05:37 -0700
From: Paul Gilmartin
Reply-To: TSO REXX Discussion List
Organization: None
Newsgroups
tion is
installed in the "doc"
subdirectory of the Rexx installation directory (which the Windows environment
variable named
"REXX_HOME" points to).
So on Windows, if you enter '?' in rexxtry.rex, you get the rexxref.pdf window.
(This part of
rexxtry.rex will not be executed on
ds get stored with it. So why is it that
package's local is not
of type StringTable, but of type Directory?
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Forwarding on behalf of Alexander Seik, ---rony
Forwarded Message
Subject:[Bsf4oorexx-devel] New Version of ooRexx Plugin for IntelliJ
IDEA
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 23:22:26 +0200
From: Alexander Seik
Reply-To: bsf4oorexx-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
The Regina documentation at
<https://sourceforge.net/projects/regina-rexx/files/regina-documentation/3.9.1/regina.pdf/download>,
p. 74, ADDRESS()-BIF documents and gives examples of the different return
values.
---rony
On 17.05.2020 18:47, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>
> Skimming
* Error ... returns the error default
* Normal ... returns the current default environment
Not sure whether this would be possible in the ooRexx implementation (if so, a
RFE might document
this for a future implementation).
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel ma
Just stumbled over
<https://www.tutorialspoint.com/rexx/rexx_object_oriented.htm> and thought it to
be interesting for this audience. :)
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net
Hi P.O.,
On 28.04.2020 22:16, P.O. Jonsson wrote:
> Hi Rony and thanks for the script. I have adapted it to my needs and can make
> the .fo files now.
> As it turns out xsltproc is included with macOS itself so once I got the
> redirect for the http:
> working everything fell in
Hi there,
having mac ports on my older Mac with docbook 4.5 support installed, I could
adjust the Linux script
for the Mac (in essence the copy command is different) and arrived at the
following timings for
creating the fo files for the "rexxpg" and "rexxref" books:
wu
;--path
'/etc/xml' " would not be necessary) where xsltproc on Linux looks up the
catalog which points to
/usr/share/... such that the local files get used for lookup.
The challenge now is to get the local lookup in effect on the Windows version
of xsltproc into which
Gil has b
Forgot to give the timings on Ubuntu (an older desktop PC):
rony@rony-linux:~/dev/orx-docs$ sh doc2fo.sh
rexxpg ...
Making portrait pages on A4 paper (210mmx297mm)
*1.04user* 0.03system 0:01.08elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
67912maxresident)k
0inputs+3256outputs (0major
orm independent manner)
using Apache
Xalan/Xerces.
---rony
On 27.04.2020 16:00, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
> On 27.04.2020 15:49, P.O. Jonsson wrote:
>> Thanks Rony for the information, I have been to most of these places already
>> :-( but indeed you are right, I am entire
On 27.04.2020 15:49, P.O. Jonsson wrote:
> Thanks Rony for the information, I have been to most of these places already
> :-( but indeed you are right, I am entirely in the dark since I do not really
> understand the logics behind these things.
>
> That said - I will give it a
On 27.04.2020 15:39, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
... cut ...
> Looks like one of those things where the ones in the know think everything
> they know goes without
> saying/is obvious and therefore not giving enough information for people who
> use this
> infrastructure rarely o
Well, after returning and setting up the environment according to my own
directions it turns out
that they are *not* doing what I thought they were! :(
So please ignore this post.
---rony
P.S.: Not sure what has happened, in the meantime I think it to be possible
that the step doc2fo
/work/svn/oorexx/docs/trunk/tools/tmp/docbook4.5/docbook.dtd/"
Create the docs.
E.g. "rexxref.pdf" now needs appr. 20 seconds to be created compared to more
than 10 minutes without
the local DTDs!
---rony
On 23.04.2020 19:53, Gil Barmwater wrote:
>
> I suspect the slow perf
hy would one mark up Rexx method name symbols thereby emphasizing them in
the resulting typeset book, but none of the other Rexx symbols (instruction
names etc) in the text, what is the reasoning?
—-rony
Rony G. Flatscher (mobil/e)
>> Am 09.04.2020 um 19:46 schrieb Gil Barmwater :
On 09.04.2020 15:24, Erich Steinböck wrote:
> Rony, I'd rather avoid introducing new terminology like "specializes",
> "constructor" or
> "destructor" - none of our ooRexx docs use it.
You may have noted that "specializes" is given in parenthe
ions, once the current work on Linux installers has concluded, assuming
in the days, maybe
weeks to come. With the help of Mark and of Enrico this should be a feasible
and welcome feature for
ooRexx 5 on Linux, without distracting resources or holding up a release.
---rony
On 07.04.2020 13:32, R
left out altogether (but leaving it in
the interpreter for
backlevel support).
What do you think?
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
proof-read that chapter 5, A Closer Look at
Objects. If something is
unclear or the English needs corrections or brush ups, please let me know.
Chances are that you
learn something new as a price! ;-)
---rony
[1] Temporary Dropbox link to the above books:
<https://www.dropbox.com/sh/gxv
community as a whole!
—-rony
Rony G. Flatscher (mobil/e)
> Am 07.04.2020 um 08:33 schrieb P.O. Jonsson :
>
>
>>> Am 07.04.2020 um 01:40 schrieb Mark Hessling :
>>>
>>> The only "configuration" is when you want to switch between alternate Rexx
>
t; term which is only discussed at a
> much later chapter.
This can be fixed easily by using a link to the chapter that discusses the term.
As a matter of fact I just updated the current draft/WIP accordingly so you may
want to check the
updated rexxpg.pdf from [1].
---rony
[1] Current draft/WIP &
Subject says it all: <http://doccookbook.sourceforge.net/html/en/index.html>,
it concentrates on
DocBook 5, but states that quite a lot can be still used for 4, although needs
adaption perhaps.
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx
chapter you can see a class hierarchy that places
the classes that
employ multiple inheritance underneath all of the inherited classes.
Any feedback from everyone in this list appreciated!
---rony
On 01.04.2020 18:29, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
> Erich, thank you very much for the links!
>
Erich, thank you very much for the links!
On 01.04.2020 17:35, Erich Steinböck wrote:
> Rony, you find the DocBook reference at
> https://tdg.docbook.org/tdg/4.5/docbook.html
> Each tag lists its allowed parents and children (if any).
>
> You can find ooRexx 4.2 documenta
quot;chunking" or
> "xref"; NB this is
> DocBook 5!
>
Thank you, Gil!
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Hi Erich,
On 31.03.2020 23:17, Erich Steinböck wrote:
> Rony, we're on Docbook 4.5.
> xref's within classname (or filename) are not allowed.
hmm, good to know (was not aware of this as it had worked without any errors)!
:)
I would appreciate if you could give some pointers where thi
<pre>Hi P.O.,
ad rexxpg: I do not get any of these warnings.
Ad logfiles: think not all logged text is correct, sometimes misleading as in
the winextensions case.
Cheers
—-rony
Rony G. Flatscher (mobil/e)
> Am 31.03.2020 um 21:39 schrieb P.O. Jonsson <oor...@jonases.se>:
>
mmitted
with [r12032].
---rony
On 31.03.2020 17:41, Gil Barmwater wrote:
>
> There appears to be two issues based on the messages generated by the
> transform step. The first -
> Warning: multiple "IDs" for constraint linkend: - occurs 7 times for 3
> different
Gil Barmwater
version 2.0
To get Java's non-standard startup-switches just enter "java -X" on the command
line and you get an
extensive list of additional switches that control the JVM.
---rony
On 31.03.2020 08:56, P.O. Jonsson wrote:
> Thanks for checking. From what I have s
thing else as I experimented in addition also in creating the pdf and
html renderings at
the same time (which actually works) and was editing images (odg though).
So please ignore my report I cannot reproduce it myself anymore!
---rony
___
Oorexx-dev
ove " embedded" from the svg font names in
order for these svg
images to display correctly in HTML (double-checked the possible improvement
manually) in order to
not forget that step whenever an odg-image gets changed and exported to svg in
the future.
---rony
On 30.03.2020 15:04, Gil Ba
-referenced links
(tested randomly)!
Thank you very much for all of your efforts!
Kudos!
---rony
On 28.03.2020 18:25, Gil Barmwater wrote:
>
> Hi Rony,
>
> Thanks for trying the new version of the package and I am happy that I
> haven't broken the PDF
> generation :-).� Now t
*[Oorexx-svn]* subject is more precise in that it hints at the first
file name that got changed.
No clues how to go about it though.
---rony
> Am 29.03.2020 um 19:23 schrieb Gil Barmwater <mailto:gbarmwa...@alum.rpi.edu>>:
>>
>> Did you see mine for r12010 - the fix for t
Resubscribing told me that I have been already subscribed to:
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
To be sure that they do not get filtered away I searched through all my e-mail
folders for the
string "[12010]" in subject without success. So that svn-e-mail has not arrived
either, which is
really strange.
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel ma
On 29.03.2020 19:23, Gil Barmwater wrote:
>
> Did you see mine for r12010 - the fix for the CSS issues? Gil
>
Hmm, as a matter of fact: no!
These are the svn e-mails that I have received (I filter them to the same local
mailbox as patches:
That is really strange: I see all commits except for P.O.'s commits!
---rony
On 29.03.2020 18:04, Jon Wolfers wrote:
> Hi P.O.,
>
> Are you subscribed to the OoRexx-svn list
> <https://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/lists/oorexx-svn>? That wasn't one
> of the ones that
ion complete
20:08:50 - Creating PDF_files\rexxpg.pdf from fo_files\rexxpg.fo using
Apache FOP
20:08:56 - PDF created
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
lly generated mails with your
commits. (I do get them
e.g. from Erich.)
Cheers
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
rexx.html
28.03.2020 16:26 2 212 typeles.html
28.03.2020 16:26 3 832 which.html
28.03.2020 16:26 4 418 xfunct.html
28.03.2020 16:26 4 265 xwrite.html
35 File(s)127 667 bytes
4 Dir(s) 11 5
ment no single license there would pose a problem on the ooRexx project.
So my question is: what about tools that are needed to create the documentation
that do not license
CPL 1.0, but use licenses that do not infect the ooRexx license, can the be
hosted with appropriate
attribution in the ooRe
c%*\en-US\fop.cfg*
Running "doc2pdf" then generated the "testpg.pdf" book without errors. It looks
like the
"rexxpg.pdf" book.
---
Knowing that you are currently busy with other things I thought to document
this such that you could
look into it yourself and judge
Forgot to check in my changes that have led to yesterday's rendering of the
rexxpg book, checked in
with r12003.
---rony
On 23.03.2020 19:09, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>
> Hi Gil,
>
> On 20.03.2020 19:07, Gil Barmwater wrote:
>> I finally have had an opportunity to look
lease fix the
> copyright or remove
> it from the svn, and please also do so for any other of your current or
> future commits.
What is the problem (I really do not understand)? What constitutes a "fix"?
---rony
___
Oorexx-dev
method names.
Please take a look at that and please give feedback ASAP whether that is o.k.?
If it is o.k. the "Document Conventions" need to be changed accordingly as well.
>
> On 3/20/2020 9:15 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>> On 19.03.2020 14:31, Gil Barmwater wrote:
>
On 20.03.2020 14:23, René Jansen wrote:
> just want to correct one terminology issue: a monotype font is a font from a
> specific foundry, a monospaced (or non-proportional) font is what you mean.
Ah, yes, thank you René, also:
<https://www.tate.org.uk/art/art-terms/m/monotype&g
On 20.03.2020 14:14, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 9:13 AM Rony G. Flatscher <mailto:rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at>> wrote:
>
> On 19.03.2020 12:21, Rick McGuire wrote:
> > the sem.cls example is not intended to show how to use semaphores, but
be assessed whether
it negatively impacts the overall look-and feel of the books.
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
added the links locally.
One more question (cannot find the thread): shall I remove the documentation
for EventSemaphore's
and MutexSemaphore's close method?
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.source
n 19.03.2020 11:47, P.O. Jonsson wrote:
> I have provided the patch and will wait with the next step until that is in
> the system.
applied your patch with r12001, thank you!
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourcefor
the
winsystem and/or oodialog support would be able to fix it.
---rony
On 16.03.2020 20:51, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>
> Overhauled the rexxpg book once more concluding my work on it as long as
> nothing new pops up,
> including any kind of errors. Checked the changes into trunk,
st look up the rexxpg book where the boldness communicates an importness
above all other text and
is distracting (like in the table of context).
What do you think?
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourc
Dear P.O.,
updating the readme should be o.k. in any case as it is a documentation
improvement.
Cheers
---rony
On 16.03.2020 21:41, P.O. Jonsson wrote:
> Dear Rony,
>
> Re
>> Am 16.03.2020 um 20:18 schrieb Rony G. Flatscher > <mailto:rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at>>:
&g
s directory. Instead references to the
new classes
EventSemaphore and MutexSemaphore should be supplied such that a link gets
established. This has the
advantage that the user can also study the examples there that take advantage
of the semaphores.
If no one o
Am 16.03.2020 um 21:53 schrieb Rick McGuire :
>
>
> Dis BIF center is noch in ooRexx. Warum sagst du das?
8-))
LOL!
>
>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 4:32 PM WalterPachl wrote:
>> vii unten
>>
>> "Returns a string of length length with string centered in it and with pad
>> characters
>> added
mark below. If they
can be fixed then
they should go into rexxpg, hence requesting help for these Windows related
scripts and feedback
that I could/should use for an update of the book.
---rony
On 15.03.2020 21:27, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>
> Not sure whether I get locked out of the
sense and no one would have any objections, it is part of
the surrounding
documentation for ooRexx.
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
porarily from
<https://www.dropbox.com/sh/gxvvgskb04gdsqf/AACRo_ZLeFOdoBXUHroPY_-Ca?dl=0>.
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
ntime? What I would be looking for would be some
terminology that
self-documents that the pieces belong together and incurs a sequence, which is
not the case with
"major_version", "modification", "release" (vs. "version
rexxref/en-US/instrc.xml
rexxref/en-US/intro.xml
rexxref/en-US/iostrms.xml
rexxref/en-US/rexxutil.xml
rxsock/en-US/funcs.xml
rxsock/en-US/install.xml
My plan is to go over those files and rename the CMD-files to "rex"-files and
lowercase their names
when possible.
Any c
ays: expected output against actual
> output and the other way
> around, so getting to much or to little output would be captured.
Thank you for all of your efforts!
Best regards
---rony
>> Am 10.03.2020 um 19:34 schrieb Rony G. Flatscher > <mailto:rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at>>
S Access samples should be
adapted and tested,
the used Jet engine, I think, is still only available in 32-bit, maybe MS has a
64- to 32-bit bridge.]
---rony
P.S.: Will try to get back to chapter 4 ASAP, but also need to address other
burning issues (like
the students now are locked out of our Unive
On 10.03.2020 14:24, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 9:12 AM Rony G. Flatscher <mailto:rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at>> wrote:
>
> Thank you for your feedback, Rick. As a result the current rexxpg book at
>
> <https://www.dropbox.com/sh/gxvvgskb04g
uot;doc/trunk" and place the script
there, such that
everybody can use it, should an update of the class hierarchy become necessary
in the future?
Also, if o.k. with everybody, then I would suggest to place all book related
utilities in that
directory, each with a brief readme section at t
t, yet complete" class hierarchy be used?
---rony
On 09.03.2020 18:11, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>
> The rexxpg book lists in "Chapter 4. The Basics of Classes" all ooRexx
> classes. The listing is not
> correctly indented as the root class Object is not shown as the topmo
ort or the long form be usedj, which informs about multiple
inheritance related
classes?
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
erall the
font-size relations to each
other seem to benefit. After testing a little bit (but more experiments
probably needed) the
following font-size seems to work alright:
* body: font-size:0.9em;
But your mileage may vary.
Again, kudos, the HTML renderings look great as they are already!
On 08.03.2020 23:07, Jon Wolfers wrote:
> Thanks Rick
>
> I've got it now. That is how one would want it to work.
> Not sure what should go in the rexxpg but will sleep on it.
:)
Will wait for an explanation that is easy to understand, in excellent English
and correct! ;-)
Dear Bill,
On 09.03.2020 03:11, Bill Turner, WB4ALM wrote:
> Rony, thank you for catching the fact that my message only went to you, and
> thank you for
> forwarding it on to the entire list.
did not forward it, just tried to make you aware of it. Now, that you thought I
di
even more and thereby making it clearer it seems!
Not being a native
English speaker I leave it for others to judge whether the phrase "the
interpreter ..." should
remain or not. The rexxpg book now reflects Chip's suggestion without the
phrase.
---rony
>
> On 3/
eek these names when researching the appropriate Rexx
attributes/methods.
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
would be benefitial if both names would be the same for both classes.
Shall I open a RFE for this?
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
that be understandable and correct?
---rony
On 08.03.2020 17:58, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 12:50 PM Jon Wolfers <mailto:sahana...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Rony,
>
> The created binary file is dependent on the Rexx language level and
> th
Incorporated Jon's feedback, removed the last paragraph, introduced a note with
the text draft, cf.
current "rexxpg.pdf" from
<https://www.dropbox.com/sh/gxvvgskb04gdsqf/AACRo_ZLeFOdoBXUHroPY_-Ca?dl=0>.
---rony
On 08.03.2020 17:12, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
Gil, thank you for this hint! Just tested it (replaced "computeroutput" with
the much shorter
"code"): the visual result is the same, however typing is much improved! ;-)
---rony
On 08.03.2020 16:57, Gil Barmwater wrote:
>
> Rony, have you tried the t
exx or each time you switch the bitness
of the Rexx
interpreter you need to run rexxc again.
How does that sound?
---rony
> On Sun, 8 Mar 2020 at 15:53, Rony G. Flatscher <mailto:rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at>> wrote:
>
> "RFB" is meant to mean "request f
case and as
computeroutput-elements to
make them stand out in the text.
Temporarily "rexxpg.pdf" can be loaded from:
<https://www.dropbox.com/sh/gxvvgskb04gdsqf/AACRo_ZLeFOdoBXUHroPY_-Ca?dl=0>.
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
renderings show that the svg images
display and scale in
the highest resolution.
@P.O.: there would be no need anymore to recreate the HTML renderings for the
rexxpg book.
So, Gil, thumbs up! +1
Great job!
---rony
[1] "Convert Pixel (X) to Millimeter":
<https://www.unitconverters
nd if
so, which effect.)
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
to one of the html books (preferable the rexxpg book)?
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Thank you for your feedback and also pointing at the formatting problem in 2.9,
Mike!
Corrected the formatting problem and replaced the book with the corrected one.
---rony
On 07.03.2020 17:39, Mike Cowlishaw wrote:
> Centred looks better, to me. Maybe for the railroad diagrams too? Or ma
s.pdf" which can be directly compared to
"rexxpg-svg.pdf" or
"rexxpg-png-original.pdf", cf. [1].
The question is: would you think centering the figures/images improves the
appearence of the book?
---rony
[1] Temporarily at:
<https://www.dropbox.com/sh/gxvvgskb04gds
Hi Erich,
On 06.03.2020 21:21, Erich Steinböck wrote:
> Rony, the SVG images work fine when building for PDF, but last time I tried
> building for HTML, I
> found that they displayed much worse than PNG.
That is indeed quite strange. Maybe the transformation to html created
replacemen
if no one objects.
> Anyhow, I have no idea why I chose PNGs - I was probably asked to - and the
> SVGs look better to me
> so my vote is to go ahead and replace them.
That for sure was a lot of work and great that you have done it!
---rony
__
yes, all books are generated with Gil's toolset (I would not be
able to do that without it)!
Cheers
---rony
>
>> Am 06.03.2020 um 18:57 schrieb Rony G. Flatscher > <mailto:rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at>>:
>>
>> The "Programming Guide" (rexxpg.pdf) uses png-bitma
.7MB) of
the png version (appr. 0,91 MB). Still, as the overall appearence looks nicer I
would like to
replace the png graphics with the svg renderings if no one objects.
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourc
Thank you very much for this clarification, have adjusted accordingly!
Also it helps to look out for pending items that need to be tackled in the
trackers.
---rony
On 04.03.2020 17:39, Rick McGuire wrote:
> Pending should only be used when there are no more work items needed for a
>
i.pdf
${DOC_SOURCE_DIR}/rexxpg.pdf
${DOC_SOURCE_DIR}/rexxref.pdf
${DOC_SOURCE_DIR}/rxmath.pdf
Would anyone object if I added it to CMakeLists.txt ?
---rony
On 03.03.2020 17:54, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>
> Enter
not yet tackled? So in the example RFE 754 above
"doc+test" means that the
documentation needs to be changed and a test needs to be created/adjusted
to test the new feature?
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Entered an RFE [1] to this effect and supplied the sources for the two split
books with it.
---rony
[1] RFE "#773 Split 'rexxpg' into two books ... ":
<https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/feature-requests/773/>
On 03.03.2020 14:52, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>
> Dear Ha
Dear Harmander,
thank you for the idea of leaving the name "rexxpg", which I just did. So if
using the Dopbox link
below there will be a "rexxpg.pdf" file there which represents the primer.
Cheers
---rony
On 03.03.2020 04:31, Harmander Singh wrote:
> Excellent! It mi
d')~callWith(arg(1,'array'));"
Does anyone have an idea how to make that a simpler, better legible statement?
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
P.O.,
maybe it would be also a good idea to create a bug ticket [1] with this and
supply your data there
as well. This will make this bug trackable and once it has been solved, can be
closed in the bug
tracking system.
Cheers
---rony
[1] ooRexx Bug Tickte: <https://sourceforge.net/p/oor
Well, there is already a Wiki about creating rail-diagrams at
<https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/wiki/how-to-change-oorexx-docs/>!
The ooRexx Wiki home is at: <https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/wiki/Home/>.
---rony
On 01.03.2020 19:39, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>
> W
yesterday to the
ooRexx project):
<https://www.dropbox.com/sh/gxvvgskb04gdsqf/AACRo_ZLeFOdoBXUHroPY_-Ca?dl=0>
What do you think?
---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
701 - 800 of 1893 matches
Mail list logo
