I agree that it would definitely make it easier to get started with
the project's binary. The only downside is if a user might want to
replace any of those JARs with newer -- presumably compatible! --
versions for some reason. It may not be an issue with OpenJPA, but
with things like Struts, it
Craig--
You're quite right; my apologies for not having caught this before now.
Given that this policy went into effect in November 2006, IMHO the
0.9.7 release that we're currently reviewing and voting on needs to be
updated to include the appropriate headers.
Thoughts?
Eddie
On 4/14/07
aders (shouldn't be any of
these...) don't inherit one.
The tools are here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/
If anyone doesn't have access to this, just let me know.
Eddie
On 4/14/07, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Craig--
You're quit
,
>
> Removing Cliff from this discussion; sorry for the spam, Cliff, but
> I recall you asking for it... ;-)
>
> On Apr 14, 2007, at 2:21 PM, Eddie O'Neil wrote:
>
>> Craig--
>>
>> You're quite right; my apologies for not having caught this
>> befo
Them's fightin' words. ;)
But, I will say that I've tried giving it another shot of late just
to make sure I'm not missing anything.
On 4/14/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And that's why vi is the best editor in the world :)
On Ap
Mike--
Thanks; is there any chance that the old artifacts are still around
somewhere? I was going to give them a review this weekend which could
save us a release round trip if any issues crop up. If they're around
somewhere, send along a link.
Thanks.
Eddie
On 4/14/07, Michael Dick <[EMAI
7;ll take a few minutes to re-publish.
On 4/14/07, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Mike--
>
> Thanks; is there any chance that the old artifacts are still around
> somewhere? I was going to give them a review this weekend which could
> save us a relea
The release is looking good with two items that should be addressed
and some nits. :)
Major issues:
- Mike's GPG key is present in site/docs/KEYS but this file needs to
be copied to http://incubator.apache.org/openjpa/KEYS as well. This
will make it easier to verify releases and matches the ins
Craig--
Thanks for the comments -- comments on comments below. :)
Eddie
On 4/18/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Eddie,
On Apr 18, 2007, at 8:46 AM, Eddie O'Neil wrote:
> The release is looking good with two items that should be addressed
> and some ni
, copyrighted and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.
> -Original Messag
Mike--
RE the KEYS file, you can just ssh to people.apache.org and check
the KEYS file out directly into /www/incubator.apache.org/openjpa/
directory. No uploading necessary! :)
To be sure -- the rest of the items are just nits which could mostly
be cleaned up just by deleting the directorie
+1 to the release. I didn't do a thorough look through this
release, but it looks like the same general package as the last RC
with the previous issues addressed. Thanks for updating the available
KEYS file -- the signatures of the binary / source zip packages worked
fine this time.
+1 to sec
+1 -- I'd prefer to have the binary / source uber-archives outside
of the Maven repro, though that's more due to convention than anything
else.
I agree that it's not worth worrying about this for 0.9.7.
Cheers,
Eddie
On 4/24/07, Michael Dick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm finally getting ba
I agree with having a good OOTB experience as well -- such an
experience helps users get started with OpenJPA and is more likely to
have them learning the APIs and using the distro.
Even better, it's all in the ASF family. :)
Eddie
On 4/23/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I
> entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted
> and/or
> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the
> individual
> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended
> recipient,
> and have received this message in error, p
> entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or
> legally
> privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity
> named
> in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received
> this
> message in error, plea
I'm not a cwiki expert by any stretch -- one thing to do would be to
forward the username and page to infrastructure@ and ask them to
delete it. Does anyone have permission to delete pages or is that
something we're missing right now?
Eddie
On 4/28/07, Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
k was as well).
To delete it, I went to the page, clicked "Edit", then clicked the
link "Remove Page".
On Apr 28, 2007, at 10:49 AM, Eddie O'Neil wrote:
> I'm not a cwiki expert by any stretch -- one thing to do would be to
> forward the username and page to
I agree with the sentiment expressed -- OpenJPA has done a good job
working together on a good code base with a growing, diverse group of
contributors. I'm proud of the work that's been done here.
These days, the Board is wary of umbrella projects and is more
comfortable with pushing smaller p
t;the projects within the scope of responsibility of the
> Apache OpenJPA
>PMC; and be it further
>
>RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
>hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
>OpenJPA PMC:
>
>
May 4, 2007, at 5:59 AM, Eddie O'Neil wrote:
> Hi, Craig. Apologies for not having reviewed this yet; I've been
> traveling this week and without much access to e-mail. When does this
> vote close?
>
> Thanks.
> Eddie
>
> On 5/4/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROT
+1, and I'm with Brian -- I don't merit inclusion in the PMC as I'm
not contributing to the community outside of just helping guide things
along. Having been through the Incubator to TLP route before, though,
I'm very happy to help with this transition with respect to
configuring infrastructure,
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 7 May 2007 12:53 p.m.
> To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduate from Incubation
>
>
> On May 6, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Eddie O'Neil wrote:
>
> >
> > ps -- Geir, even Google doesn't know what a "Ga
Thanks for taking care of this, Craig. I'll attend the Board
meeting Wednesday in case any questions about this come up.
Eddie
On 5/13/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FYI, this is the board resolution message as approved by the
incubator. The board meeting is coming up next We
how I can help through this process.
Eddie
On 5/16/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Eddie,
Thanks for being our eyes and ears at the board meeting. How'd it go?
Craig
On May 14, 2007, at 9:23 AM, Eddie O'Neil wrote:
> Thanks for taking care of this,
+1 -- assuming the code is ready to go, I agree that it's a good
idea to go straight to 1.0.
+1 as well to waiting until the TLP infrastructure is complete,
which could take a week or more to unbrand from the Incubator, move
the website content, etc.
Eddie
On 5/19/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <[E
Good point, Craig. Doesn't look to me like JIRA has been setup --
I'd be happy to take care of that.
Eddie
On 5/8/06, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Patrick,
On May 4, 2006, at 9:31 AM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
> Comments inline.
>
>> Before you check in code, it would be nice
Maven shouldn't have any trouble with the 1.5 language features;
I've switched from Ant to Maven2 for everything possible locally. To
configure Maven to compile with 1.5, just use the below to do
so.
FWIW, I'm totally +1 on Maven support and wish we had Beehive M2
enabled; it just makes thing
For sure -- that would be simples, but I have to imagine (and could
be dreaming) that we can bend Maven to our will and have separate,
individually configured / built modules that can be rolled into a
single JAR file at the end.
That keeps the number of JARs from exploding (Maven's natural
tend
Yeah, I agree with Brian -- the original concurrency utils are great
and are basically the code that ended up in the JDK in 1.5. Beehive
took a look at those about a year ago and deemed that the license ASF
compatible and repackaged / committed them to our code base. Seems
like that might be re
jTo throw my $0.02 in here, my preference would be to see the
creation of a "Java specs" project under Jakarta or some other
appropriate ASF place. That way we can cleanroom our own
implementations of these classes where appropriate and not rely on
licensing terms from 3rd parties. Then, these
FYI...we need to report for two reasons -- it's our month *and*
we're in our first three months. :)
Eddie
-- Forwarded message --
From: Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jun 14, 2006 10:31 PM
Subject: Incubator Quarterly Board Reporting Schedule
To: general@incubator.a
OpenJPA
Still getting started. No report provided, although there is somewhat
active e-mail traffic (average of about 1 e-mail per day over the past
two months).
D'oh -- we need to take care of this next time. I forwarded the mail
to open-jpa-dev@ but failed to follow up -- apologies...
Edd
Agreed -- the CTR process has worked well for Beehive. Basically,
we commit the documents for the site to SVN and use Forrest (or some
other site generation tool) to convert these XML files into the site's
.html files. Both the source documents and website are committed to
SVN.
Then, both the
+1. Having been through an unwinding of the site/ from the trunk/,
it's definitely worth thinking about breaking these apart. Over time,
it's easy for them to become intertwined.
A good structure is to make them peers as trunk/ is versioned with
releases while the site/ is typically versioned
Nor I as well.
On 7/31/06, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nor I.
Craig
On Jul 31, 2006, at 5:22 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
> I didn't get any either -- very odd. I haven't received any commit
> messages from Abe's commits.
>
> -Patrick
>
> --
> Patrick Linskey
> BEA Systems, In
Hi, Pinaki. You can subscribe to the openjpa mailing lists by
sending mail to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eddie
On 8/8/06, Pinaki Poddar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
please add [EMAIL PROTECTED] to this mailing list. i work in OpenJPA
development team.
Pinaki Poddar
BEA Systems
415.402.7317
__
Kevin--
Wearing my mentor hat...
I say go for it -- if you're confident in your changes, it passes
the tests, and does right by the project, this is how community is
built. Occasionally, we'll break a few eggs, but this is how everyone
learns to work together.
Patrick, Abe, and others can c
Something like this might be handy:
find . ! ( -path "*/.svn/*" ) -exec sed ... ; -print
as it won't descend into .svn directories. Or something that just
greps "*.java" extensions since SVN stores its work files as
"*.java.svn-work":
find . -name "*.java" -exec sed ... ; -print
These hav
Kevin--
Not sure what's up with your permissions (if it even is that...),
but I just created a sandboxes/ line here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openjpa/sandboxes/
See if you're able to commit a file there and then try copying the trunk/ line.
Eddie
On 8/31/06, Kevin Sutter
ust curious.
Thanks again!
Kevin
On 8/31/06, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Kevin--
>
> Not sure what's up with your permissions (if it even is that...),
> but I just created a sandboxes/ line here:
>
>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/o
I've added the blurb pasted below which provides a high-level
overview particularly about the status of the community. It would be
great if someone could add a little content about the technical
details as well (Patrick?).
Eddie
The code arrived this quarter, and that helped the community as
Marc--
A couple of comments:
#1: Since the vote has only been open for 24 hours, there may not have
been enough time for everyone to comment on the release -- while there
are already 3 +1s which are sufficient to declare a release, the
additional time allows those who haven't had time to look a
It also appears that the LICENSE and NOTICE files are missing from SVN.
The STATUS file is missing as well -- I'll add that.
Eddie
On 10/19/06, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Marc--
A couple of comments:
#1: Since the vote has only been open for 24 hours, th
Just so everyone is aware of this ASF infrastructure downtime.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sander Striker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Oct 18, 2006 4:53 PM
Subject: [NOTICE] Scheduled downtime for critical infrastructure
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Upcoming Saturday 21st throug
Marc--
Quick work! Thanks for taking care of these things. Couple of comments:
I didn't realize there was a de-facto minimum time
Typically, vote time runs for 3 days, which gives folks in different
time zones and day jobs enough time to have a look.
I did follow-up with a thread on Kevi
Marc--
Cool! Nice to have an example for those of use that aren't JPA experts. :)
One suggestion would be to add the ASF source header to the build /
pom / source files so that this module is ready to go for the next
release.
Cheers,
Eddie
On 10/27/06, Marc Prud'hommeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
All--
I've added a STATUS file at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openjpa/STATUS
this repeats some information that is covered elsewhere but is useful
for communicating a summary of the committers, issues, status reports,
and releases for the project. Think of it as the Cliff's No
Thanks, Kevin. You saved me there. :)
Eddie
On 11/11/06, Kevin Sutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree. I will volunteer myself for the next one release...
On 11/10/06, Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Agreed. I'll go further and nominate "someone not employed by BEA,
Great job on this release -- we're really down to nitty-little
detail issues with the distribution. More detailed comments are below
-- the highlights fall into two major buckets:
#1: information needed in NOTICE.txt. This refers to the ActiveMQ
project; it also needs to refer to the source fi
.
On Nov 11, 2006, at 9:11 PM, Eddie O'Neil wrote:
> Great job on this release -- we're really down to nitty-little
> detail issues with the distribution. More detailed comments are below
> -- the highlights fall into two major buckets:
>
> #1: information needed in NOT
+1 -- great working getting the release packages ready for the
Incubator PMC.
Eddie
On 11/14/06, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
Craig
On Nov 12, 2006, at 2:45 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> OpenJPA People-
>
> In accordance with the Incubating Releases guidelines at http:
our own site.
I believe this is the last showstopper for getting through the vote
on general@incubator.apache.org (assuming the current vote on open-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] passes).
On Nov 16, 2006, at 6:20 PM, Eddie O'Neil wrote:
> On Robert's point about IP clearance, I'd marked
FWIW, I'm +1 on the bits (though late) but +0 on the release as we
need to get the IP stuff taken care of.
Patrick, do you recall who from BEA signed the code grant agreement?
Eddie
On 11/25/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
quick question - is anything different in this then
k Linskey:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:Signed
Corp CLA for Stephen Kim, Patrick Linskey, Marc Prud'hommeaux, Pinaki
Poddar, Abe White FOR JPA Bindings, core persistence kernel, utility
code, build infrastructure, tests and documentation
Eddie O'Neil wrote:
> FWIW, I'm +1 on the bits (tho
A'right -- the website is updated.
+1 on release and calling a new IPMC vote.
Eddie
On 11/25/06, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Terrific -- apologies that I'd missed that in cclas.txt; I grep'ed
for the wrong thing. :)
I'll update the website
All--
Apologies for the short fuse, but OpenJPA needs to provide a status
update to the Board as part of the Incubator report this month.
Please review the text below (committed to the /STATUS file as well).
It would be great to have an update about the technical work going on
right now.
This
Yeah, this is what we do in Beehive as well. My suggestion would be
to document the SVN configuration settings for OpenJPA committers in
something like DEVELOPING.txt at the top-level of the project. Over
time as new committers come on board, just make sure that they're
aware of this and use it
+1
On 2/9/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
My vote is as much related to dissatisfaction with the maven repo
that is used by glassfish as with the time it takes to get anything
done through official channels.
Craig
On Feb 8, 2007, at 9:41 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>
+1 as well -- thanks for putting this together.
Eddie
On 3/23/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1. Sounds good to me. Thanks for putting this together on such short
notice.
On Mar 23, 2007, at 9:05 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> We need to report what happened this quarter
+1 -- excellent work. Who knew!
Eddie
On 3/27/07, Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dude when did Marc figure out how to make pretty HTML?
I love the new look. Thanks!
-Patrick
--
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc.
_
61 matches
Mail list logo
