> On 8 Oct 2018, at 23:09, Peter Gummer wrote:
>
> ...Attached to this email is the CLUSTER that Ian attached to the Jira issue.
Hmmm, I don’t think this mailing list accepts attachments. Here is the CLUSTER
as ADL.
Peter
archetype (adl_version=1.4)
op
Hi Heather,I think I've tracked down why this was changed in the Ocean Archetype Editor. It seems to be this change on 6th May 2012: https://github.com/openEHR/arch_ed-dotnet/commit/bb50d16ad44e910d717c9e75e967fe1b1af36c46 EDT-567: Allow assumed value to be set on any data, not just on patient
gt; Kind regards
>
> Hildi
>
> Hildegard McNicoll
> Chief Operations Officer
>
>
>
> mobile: +44 (0)7932 502655
> landline: +44 (0)1536 414994
> skype: hild5559
> twitter: @hildegardfranke
> LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/hildegardfranke>
>
Hi Hildi,
> On 20 Aug 2018, at 19:13, Hildegard McNicoll wrote:
>
> Incidentally, the new web based ADL Designer tool developed by Marand doesn't
> have this problem anymore. As far as I know it is very close to being
> released now.
I’m curious — from a purely academic perspective, now,
healthelife.in e: dil...@healthelife.in
>
>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 5:46 PM, Peter Gummer wrote:
>> Hi Dileep,
>>
>> Yes, this is expected. The behaviour was first noticed about 10 years ago,
>> and initially it was reported as a bug. After some thought we
Hi Dileep,
Yes, this is expected. The behaviour was first noticed about 10 years ago, and
initially it was reported as a bug. After some thought we realised that it’s
the correct behaviour. I found it incredibly annoying too!
My memory of the exact reasoning is poor, after all of these years;
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> Presumably via use of a transpiler or a bytecode to js/webassembly compiler.
>
> On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 10:56 AM, Peter Gummer
> <peter.gum...@gmail.com<mailto:peter.gum...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> On 1 Feb 2018, at 05:13, Thomas Beale
> <
On 1 Feb 2018, at 05:13, Thomas Beale wrote:
> ... But the main interest is that we will be able to build new tools such as
> a Java/JS replacement for the ADL Workbench, and of course things like a
> high-quality, BMM-driven runtime archetype validating kernel for EHR
Hi Dileep,
According to the error message, the problem is with the timing_repetition
archetype. The error says that it has an unexpected attribute: existence.
Your zip file doesn’t contain this archetype so I can’t take a look at it
myself, but it should be easy to find the existence
Hi Pablo,
The way to produce the ADL that you’ve posted below is with a “Choice” element.
1. Go to the Archetype Editor’s “Definition” tab.
2. Click the [+] button on the left.
3. From the drop-down list, select “New element” and “Choice”.
4. Over on the right of the screen, you will see two
There is in fact a mailing list dedicated to announcements: the
openehr-announce list. It’s the first one listed here:
http://openehr.org/community/mailinglists
Peter
> On 27 Dec 2016, at 03:55, Bert Verhees wrote:
>
> I think Jan Marc has a point but Pablo is
Hi Silje,
Yes, it was at the end of October that I was trying to get it to work. A
DataGrid in AE was throwing exceptions, complaining about duplicates because
the property_id and text fields have to form a unique key. I did manage to find
and remove one pair of duplicates from the file that
On 27 Nov 2015, at 21:30, Bert Verhees wrote:
>
> Anyway, the Ocean Archetype-Editor (does it support demographics now?) is not
> the OpenEHR specification, it is just an implementation.
Hi Bert,
No, the Ocean Archetype Editor doesn’t support demographics yet. Fixes and
On 28 Nov 2015, at 00:36, Ivar Yrke wrote:
>
> Are there any plans to include transition support in these tools? Is there
> anything we are overlooking in our approach?
Hi Ivar,
Until two years ago the Archetype Editor used to have a Transitions option from
the Pathway
Dmitry Baranov wrote:
>
> Hi, could you please implement such a function?
Hi Dmitry,
I’m not sure if this helps, but if you already have a local directory of ADL
archetypes then you can run the Ocean Archetype Editor in batch-processing mode
from the command line to
be
\.v[0-9]+(\..*)?
that forces there to be one or more digits, and if there is anything else, it
must start with a dot. Somewhat safer perhaps.
- thomas
On 22/07/2015 23:34, Peter Gummer wrote:
Hi Ian,
The + is redundant here, since it’s just saying that there has to be one or
more digits
Hi Ian,
The + is redundant here, since it’s just saying that there has to be one or
more digits after the ‘v’. But the next thing that it says is that you can have
anything at all after those digits.
So you might as well omit the +:
\.v[0-9].*
This says that there has to be a digit after the
Ralph van Etten wrote:
This has lead to our current version of MedRecord (which is still work in
progress) and can be found here:
https://mr.dev.medvision360.org/mr/apidocs/#!/
Hi Ralph,
That link doesn?t work. It displays this:
{error:406,message:The resource identified by the request
Hi Ralph,
Mac OS X 10.9.5 with Safari 7.1.2.
The first time I clicked on the link it asked me for a certificate, which
seemed pointless to give it for API docs so I clicked Cancel. Then it displayed
the error.
On subsequent attempts it goes straight to the error. I guess the browser must
be
Ralph van Etten wrote:
Perhaps you can try the version without SSL?
http://mr.dev.medvision360.org/mr/apidocs/#!/
Yes, Ralph, that version works for me.
Also, for the record, Ralph made the server less strict so that the original
link that he gave us
Bert Verhees wrote:
The point for me is separation of transport layer and application layer, and
each domain has its own errorhandling.
Hi Bert,
HTTP is not a transport layer protocol:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypertext_Transfer_Protocol
?The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is an
Bakke, Silje Ljosland silje.ljosland.bakke at
helse-bergen.nomailto:silje.ljosland.bakke at helse-bergen.no wrote:
Are there any alternative XSL transform files like tdo-csharp.xsl but for other
languages available anywhere? Specifically, a VB.nethttp://VB.net one would
be very useful.
Hi
pablo pazos pazospablo at hotmail.commailto:pazospablo at hotmail.com wrote:
The version I have is 2.6.1214Beta, don't know if that's the last revision of
the 2.6 version.
That?s interesting, the latest 2.6 version that we have is 2.6.1213. Our
downloads server crashed here last year and maybe
Hi Pablo,
Archetype Editor's menu option to change to a different language is different
from the command-line option:
* The command line option overrides your computer?s locale. For example, when
in England, your computer's locale is probably en-GB and the user interface
will be displayed in
This is not related to the topic, but I prefer to have all this reports on th
same thread. When I create an archetype (see attached), without saving it,
and click on the interface tab (i spanish should be interfaz), I get an
exception:
...
System.NotSupportedException: Constraint type
pablo pazos pazospablo at hotmail.com wrote:
About translations, I would like to create poper translations to spanish. Is
there a translation guide or i18n files I can upgrade?
Hi Pablo,
All of Archetype Editor?s translations are in one file, ?terminology.xml? which
is maintained on
pablo pazos pazospablo at hotmail.com wrote:
1. When I add and remove EVENTs from an OBSERVATION, and then go to the
Terminology tab, I can see all the nodeIDs generated for the EVENTs I've
created but already removed from the archetype definition. Screen capture
shows the items that
Thomas Beale thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com wrote:
On 20/09/2013 12:01, Diego Bosc? wrote:
...
There is even an invariant defined as Archetype_node_id_valid:
archetype_node_id /= Void and then not archetype_node_id.is_empty
How does this work in your current implementations when
pablo pazos pazospablo at hotmail.com wrote:
I would like to see both Archetype Editors to support this profile: to open
an archetype with the default behaviour of the specs (not having a nodeID for
every node) on LinkEHR Ed. and work ok, and open a profiled archetype in
Ocean AE and also
Bert Verhees bert.verhees at rosa.nl wrote:
The items in ontology are very limited, only text and description. I must
agree that this is not much, especially if you want the at-nodes being
explained by code systems.
But on the other hand, it is easy to introduce a sanity-rule. Let the text
Bert Verhees bert.verhees at rosa.nl wrote:
The issue is that both, Ocean and LinkEhr, do not recognize their
responsibility and do not see a need to change this.
Hi Bert,
Glad you've brought this up again, but the problem won't get fixed unless you
report it. Can you report the problem at
Bert Verhees bert.verhees at rosa.nl wrote:
Or leave it and do nothing with it, like this has been done for years now.
The market maybe will correct you.
Nothing has been done about it, Bert, because no one has ever logged it as an
issue.
If any one out there actually does care about this,
Bert Verhees bert.verhees at rosa.nl wrote:
They could be grateful accept the help I offered until now and profit from
it, they can also do nothing with it. It is their choice. I fully respect
that.
But saying that the tool isn't better because I (me, as a person) refuse to
walk through
Bert Verhees wrote:
I have a problem with both archetype-editors, I explained a few times on this
list why.
Both change archetypes while loading them, f.e. one likes to add node-id's to
datavalues, and the other does not like that.
There are some more incompatibilities, between the both.
Bert Verhees wrote:
And of course, good non-GUI-building archetype-editors which are still not
there, the complains I had about the both mainstream archetype-editors were
admitted, but the improvement did not yet come.
Hi Bert,
I remember that you described some inconsistencies on one of
Tim Cook wrote:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Ian McNicoll
Ian.McNicoll at oceaninformatics.com wrote:
You are conflating two quite different issues.
I don't think so. I demonstrated what the specifications have to say
on the matter.
Then pointed out that an internationally
Roger Erens wrote:
Finally, the link to the download page of the command line compiler
links to that of the AWB.
Hi Roger,
That's correct. The command line compiler is part of the ADL Workbench
installation.
Peter
On 18/01/2013, at 20:11, Seref Arikan wrote:
from the top of my head: reads like a path problem with the images embedded
into AW, due to fact that it is being developed under Windows, and you're
trying to run it under Linux.
Yes, an image path problem; but no, ADL Workbench is
On 18/01/2013, at 21:55, Seref Arikan wrote:
I know it is cross platform :) That is why I wrote, developed under
Windows, which implies that the developer might have used Windows style
relative paths for images.
No, we don't. There is nothing Windows-specific about ADL Workbench. It
pablo pazos wrote:
I'm testing archetype specialization using the AE, but I can't find a way to
redefine a constraint of the parent archetype inside the specialized one.
The problem is that the AE doesn't show the nodes of the parent archetype on
the specialized one.
Hi Pablo,
AE is
pablo pazos wrote:
I think it would be better if the AE copies the parents nodes into the
specialized archetype when the AE user clicks on File Specialize, of
course, only when the ADL version is 1.4.
Manual copying is error prone. What do you think?
I'm not sure, but I think that when
Ian McNicoll wrote:
Assumed value: This is a statement in an archetype which asserts what should
happen if a value is missing. It can really only apply safely to an element
is Observation/State or in a Cluster archetype intended for use in state.
Ian, it's not only CLUSTER archetypes that
pablo pazos wrote:
It seems there's is a problem in the Archetype Editor when trying to specify
pathway transitions on an ACTION archetype. If I select the prescribe state
in the medication pathway (openEHR-EHR-ACTION-medication.v1) and check on
transition allowing transitions to Suspended
pablo pazos wrote:
Hi Ian, Peter was right, the issue was because I've installed ADLWB
v1.4.1.595 in my notebook.
I downloaded the ADLWB from here:
http://wiki.oceaninformatics.com/confluence/display/TTL/ADL+Workbench+Releases
And this page lead my to the old download page:
Ian McNicoll wrote:
Are you using the openEHR or Ocean version of the archetype editor?
That would make no difference, Ian. The same ADL is generated by openEHR and
Ocean Archetype Editors.
I'm sure that the problem is that Pablo must be using a very old version of ADL
Workbench.
Peter
Athanasios Anastasiou wrote:
Is there a known problem with the following archetypes?
openEHR-DEMOGRAPHIC-CLUSTER.individual_credentials_iso.v1
openEHR-DEMOGRAPHIC-CLUSTER.person_additional_data_br.v1
openEHR-DEMOGRAPHIC-CLUSTER.person_birth_data.v1
If not, could there be something with the
Seref Arikan wrote:
If you go to RDF without XSD as the intermediate output, I'll ask: from what
computable form you are going to go to RDF?
I assumed it would be from OPT (operational template).
Peter
Timothy Cook wrote:
Do you plan to build Linux binaries? BTW: The 32 bit (beta-5) also runs on
64 bit machines (Ubuntu 11.04 Intel Duo Core2)
Hi Tim,
There's a Linux build up there now, as well as a build for Mac OS X Lion.
- Peter
Bert Verhees wrote:
The OCEAN-editor creates a C_DV_ORDINAL which is empty in the definition but
handles the constraint in the term-defitions
ADL-part:
C_DV_ORDINAL
And in the term-definitions, it looks like this (it is under the NodeID from
the parent ELEMENT)
[at0004] =
Ian McNicoll wrote:
I did have a go at fixing this but it turns out to be a nontrivial problem.
Actually you did fix a very similar problem, Ian, in July last year. But it
only fixed the primary language. The problem is still happening in different
languages, such as Pablo's example.
Pablo,
pablo pazos wrote:
I have some proposals that might improve some aspects of the AE:
...
- the translation is very poor, how can I translate the GUI terms?
That would be great, Pablo.
Under the directory where Archetype Editor is installed, there's a directory
called Terminology. You can
pablo pazos wrote:
Several students have experienced problems using the Archetype Editor. When
they add a new language to translate an archetype, then save the changes, the
changes are not saved.
Anyone else is experiencing this problem?
Which version of Archetype Editor are they using
Hi Pablo,
It makes more sense to me to add all of that to the existing repository rather
than fragmenting the effort.
- Peter
On 06/05/2012, at 22:28, pablo pazos wrote:
Hi Peter, thanks for the pointer.
I think this is only ADL related and only 1.5. My idea is to include ADL1.4
and RM
Diego Bosc? wrote:
I would say the scope of that repository is different, as that is part
of the test for current evolving 1.5 syntax and does not include
'real' archetypes
My understanding was that Pablo was not proposing real archetypes either. In
his original post, Pablo proposed a test
pablo pazos wrote:
I have proposed here *** that we can start attaching files to the wiki and
linking them under our names, each one of us can describe each artifact, what
issues it has, what tweaks and fixes have made over those artifacts, etc.
Hi Pablo,
I get the impression that you
Thomas Beale wrote:
pablo pazos wrote:
Consider this ER scenario: a BP value could be recorded each 30 or so, and
the system could be used 1. for many patients, 2. by many users, 3. on the
same machine.
this is most likely a 1-event-per-Observation scenario. I realise it is not
Grahame Grieve wrote:
well it is the case for the History/Event structure - by definition. If you
have a situation where it is not the case - there are many! - then this is
not the data structure to use; just use separate Observations (possibly with
LINKs between them).
well, currently,
David Moner wrote:
I was exaclty thinking about this while seeing this proposal for the
ITEM_STRUCTURE change to a VALUE_CLUSTER:
Shinji KOBAYASHI wrote:
Ruby implementation might be one of the proof for replace of generics.
I had much struggled to implement generics and got the conclusion
that we do not need it.
Ruby doesn't have generics at all, right, Shinji?
There's a comparison of generics and inheritance in an
Shinji KOBAYASHI wrote:
IteratorDvText it = someRmArrayInstance.iterator()
But I found it must be cut off by 'Occam's razor' in Ruby.
it = some_rm_array.iterator
This code looks curious for Java/Eiffel/C# user who are similar to generics,
but it is enough for encapsulated object
Hi William,
I think you may have misread who wrote what. The assertion that HL7 is
proprietary was made by Fred Trotter, not by Heath.
Peter
fred trotter wrote:
...
Having said that, HL7 RIM is a proprietary ontology/model and OpenEHR, is
not.
William Goossen wrote:
Ar this stage
Heath Frankel wrote:
I believe this unique name rule should be reviewed and revoked. It is not
formally defined, as indicated in [
http://www.openehr.org/issues/browse/SPECPR-54 ] its only stated in the
architecture overview in the context of paths which assumes name is the
unique within
Sebastian Garde wrote:
A few other functional properties come to mind such as type in
PARTY_RELATIONSHIP ...
Re type: This is the same as the property name (because of the
type_validity invariant)
Yes, funny you should mention that, Sebastian, because I discovered yesterday
that this is a
Thomas Beale wrote:
This does not actually solve properly the problem of how CR/LFs are added. If
we assume one DV_PARAGRAPH = 1 CR/LF (as in word processing) then a report
needs to consist of multiple DV_PARAGRAPHs, and we don't currently have a
data type for that. To fix the current
Thomas Beale wrote:
You could model multiple paragraphs as a LIST of DV_PARAGRAPH.
but there is no 'LIST' data type to contain the DV_PARAGRAPHs.
Sorry, not a LIST, I meant a multiple-occurrence element like this:
ELEMENT[at0009] occurrences matches {0..*} matches {-- My
Colin Sutton wrote:
Couldn?t the text stored in the eHR include HTML paragraph separators,
replacing Windows or Unix specific line separators?
And HTML escape sequences?.
DV_HTMLTEXT?
That's what DV_PARSABLE is for, as Thomas mentioned ;-)
- Peter
Jostein Ven wrote:
I am trying to bind an attribute in an archetype to a value set from a
terminology server. The data in the termserver is availiable through web
services. In practice, it should thus be possible to specify a URI in an
archetype constraint for the elementattribute. Can't
Erik Sundvall wrote:
[ABSTRACT_CARE_ENTRY]^[CARE_ENTRY|data: ITEM]
[CARE_ENTRY]-[note:CARE_ENTRY Replaces both ADMIN_ENTRY and EVALUATION.]
[ABSTRACT_CARE_ENTRY]^[OBSERVATION|data: EVENTS;0..1 state: EVENTS]
[ABSTRACT_CARE_ENTRY]^[INSTRUCTION]
[ABSTRACT_CARE_ENTRY]^[ACTION]
Hi Erik,
So the
On 17/12/2011, at 8:43, Diego Bosc? wrote:
I am reading 1.0.2 IM and it says CARE_ENTRY, not GENERIC_ENTRY. which
one is the good one?
GENERIC_ENTRY is described in the integration_im.pdf. It's a sibling of ENTRY
in the inheritance hierarchy.
- Peter
Erik Sundvall wrote:
I agree with Seref. ...
If effort is put into new tools it might be good idea to do at least
the GUI in HTML5 etc.
That rules out all of those corporate users that Seref and Ian
mentioned who are stuck on IE6, doesn't it?
- Peter
Pablo Pazos wrote:
Web developers can easily tackle those problems ...
I'm afraid the word easily is wrong, Pablo. I've been doing mostly
web development for the last few years. I specifically mentioned those
things because they are _hard_ to do in in web development, whereas in
desktop
Seref Arikan wrote:
... Unfortunately, most modern
software development technologies arrive with their own runtimes,
(.net framework, jre etc) and it quickly becomes a nightmare to deploy
and update software.
I'm not aware of any such deployment problems with .NET. I'm sure
there must be
Seref Arikan wrote:
90% of the time problem is about the IT policies of the institutions.
If you develop with .NET 4.0, which would require a .net framework 4.0
runtime, you assume that the people using the software would be able
to install the runtime, and install the software.
Yes, that's
Leonardo Moretti wrote:
I have clear how to use terminology_id and code for DV_CODED_TEXT,
but here
I'm wondering if I can use the ordinal (integer) value as coded
value in a
DV_ORDINAL, like in this example (note: code_string5/code_string):
...
terminology_id
Leonardo Moretti wrote:
ELEMENT[at0061] occurrences matches {0..1} matches { -- Date/Time
element
value matches {
DV_DATE_TIME matches {*}
}
}
...
Or for the latter we need to use DV_DATE and DV_TIME rescpectively
(remember we have defined a C_DATE_TIME constraint in
, or a null flavour, but not both.
- Peter Gummer
Diego Bosc? wrote:
I know it is on ADL specs, but why limit it to an URI? Second approach
could also be used to identify a subset
The URI approach is able to specify subsets, Diego. Here is an
example, generated by the current Archetype Editor beta release
(available from
Diego Bosc? wrote:
And again not that difficult to support both kind of bindings. In my
opinion, ORGANIZATIONX::DrugFormSubset is way more human
readable and needs the same degree of 'computer interpretation' than
the URI terminology:...
I would agree that the TERMINOLOGY::subset form
Diego Bosc? wrote:
and we have also to deal with spaces!
terminology:Snomed?v=2002?s=Antiallergenic drugs (product)
Spaces are illegal in URIs. The correct form for the subset would be:
subset=Antiallergenic%20drugs%20(product)
- Peter
Thomas Beale wrote:
What probably does make sense anyway is to relax the spec in ADL 1.5
to allow both forms (and one day, probably we get rid of the URI
form). Does that seem reasonable?
This would mean, then, a revision to section 8.3.1 of the AOM 1.5
spec. Currently it says that
Cati Mart?nez wrote:
[ac0001] = [CONSULTA::1]
The ADL parser throws an error with this last one. is it right?
Hi Cati,
That last one is not a valid constraint binding. It has to be a valid
URI.
- Peter
Mahdi Asgari wrote:
Dear all,
PARTY_RELATIONSHIP has a function named type, If type is the meaning
of the relationships such as employment, authority, health
provision, why type return DV_TEXT instead of DV_CODED_TEXT?
By this type (DV_TEXT) we cannot use terminology coding system?
Cristian Armentano wrote:
Is oet template a different concept with respect to openEHR
template described in AOM 1.5?
Yes, they are different. The oet templates are the first generation of
templates in openEHR. They proved that the idea of aggregating
archetypes works in reality. The 1.5
Grahame Grieve wrote:
Generally, about FEEDER_AUDIT, it's something I had missed, so I'll go
and review it, but how does it manifest in the archetype editor?
FEEDER_AUDIT isn't shown in the Archetype Editor at all. It's one of
many parts of the reference model invisible within the tools, and
Grahame Grieve wrote:
The first is that in the archetype design we came up with (still be
posed
on CKM yet), there's a lot of identifiers present. These identifiers
are
required to deal with the interoperability aspects of the imaging exam
report (i.e. PACS reigsters images with RIS,
On 24/11/2010, at 17:42, Grahame Grieve wrote:
hi Tom
I can only presume this email actually predated our other discussion
I'd say so, Grahame, because the date on Thomas's email was 18th
November, and I recall reading its content already, many days ago.
- Peter
Thomas starting a discussion about this on the
mailing list about a year ago.
- Peter Gummer
themselves with
archetypes. They are clearly marked as samples to avoid mistaking them
for real (i.e. CKM) archetypes.
openEHR-EHR-ADMIN_ENTRY.sample_admission.v1.adl contains some internal
references.
- Peter Gummer
be
the minimal change to any archetype when migrating to 1.5.
So what I am saying is that, no matter whether anything else has
changed in the archetype, when migrating to 1.5, it would appear that
the MD5 hash is going to be different anyway.
- Peter Gummer
? ??? wrote:
When right-clicking on any element in Archetype Editor there is link
Add reference which adds a readonly element to definition.
So, what does it mean?
Hi Igor,
It's an internal reference. See the ADL 1.4 specification, section
5.3.7.
- Peter Gummer
.
That makes sense.
On committing the contribution, is there validation of the
DV_CODED_TEXT.value to ensure that it is the same text as the value
defined for the committing user's language, for that code in that
terminology?
- Peter Gummer
in Swedish, then which of the two languages
would the DV_CODED_TEXT.value be committed in?
- Peter Gummer
Sam Heard wrote:
1. Primacy of openEHR: I would propose that we need a hierarchy of
authority. Although openEHR artefacts are presently managed within the
Foundation it is possible that the governance will move to a more
authoritative organisation in the near future. That said, I believe that
Rong Chen wrote:
I would say our use case for the link is also between compositions.
For the reasons you mentioned, it would be nice to just use the
archetypeId in the constraint for the value (URI) of the link. Then it
starts to look like a mini query.
It starts looking like a kind of
Ian McNicoll wrote:
We are finding that it is much more common to want to reuse only
*parts* of an archetype and I think you might be better to think of
using CLUSTER archetypes.
That's true, Ian, but it doesn't really explain why you're not allowed
to embed an Item_tree into a CLUSTER (or
Oxford Partnership wrote:
Is there a way to change the probably ought to statement to
something a little more definite. i.e. is there a way to formerly
request this and get it in to the next build ?
I've merged OPENEHR_VERSION into the ADL Parser's current release
branch, so you can get
OxfordPartnership wrote:
The current Archetype editor makes use of two external libraries , one
for ADL parsing, one for XML parsing.
What is the licence on these libraries?, can they be used in other
applications.
The XML Parser DLL is built from Archetype Editor's source code: see the
OxfordPartnership wrote:
This seems work and I get a version back, the version reported is :
$LastChangedRevision: 203 $
$LastChangedDate: 2007-04-10 05:17:40 +1000 (Tue, 10 Apr 2007) $
As this is the parser from the latest beta release of the editor, do
those values make sense?
Oxford Partnership wrote:
Looking at the beta version of the archetype editor at
https://wiki.oceaninformatics.com/confluence/display/TTL/Archetype+Editor+Beta+Release
Can someone let me know which release this corresponds to from the
SVN code repository.
Adam Flinton wrote:
So just to be certain, if a user has some existing textual content (e.g.
a description of some construct) in a non-UTF-8 source (e.g. a Word
document or HTML page) and pastes into a text area in the Archetype editor:
A) All (mappable) non-UTF-8 chars would be
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo