RE: Christmas greetings from the CKM team

Thank you for the great report Heather. It is such a big undertaking and you have made a wonderful start. Cheers, Sam From: openEHR-clinical On Behalf Of Heather Leslie Sent: Friday, 21 December 2018 7:25 PM To: For openEHR clinical discussions Cc: For openEHR technical discussions ; For

RE: Drug dispense entry class question

Hi All There is the interesting situation as to what constitutes a stop/start and an amend for medication. Generally, if it is the same generic substance people will want to see it as an amend. This means they do not have to go through all the warnings and search again in the database. This

RE: The openEHR Asia summit succeeded.

Congratulations Shinji It is your commitment and continuity that has made such a difference. I hope to attend the next meeting. Cheers, Sam Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: openEHR-clinical on behalf of

RE: Quantities of arbitrary units in openEHR

Hi All The 'property' editor is available with the archetype editor. Has anyone had a look at adding the required type and then the whatever bit can be in all the tools. Cheers, Sam From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Sebastian Garde

RE: Process to follow for coding using Terminology server

Hi Dileep There is also the Mappings attribute set which allows you to code but without changing the text to the definition in the terminology. You can then code something in a range of terminologies. Cheers, Sam From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org]

RE: Scenarios for change type "deleted"

Hi All Ideas from a clinical perspective: 1. A patient or clinician may want to delete a composition from one instance of a health record. For example, a correspondence about a surgical operation (which is considered sensitive by a patient) might come to a mental health service and be

RE: Adverse reaction archetype... just published

Congratulations to all, a big topic and enabler. Sam Sent from my Windows Phone From: Heather Leslie Sent: ‎19/‎11/‎2015 7:02 PM To: For openEHR clinical discussions; For

Re: New paper: Archetype-based data warehouse environment

Congratulations David and to you wonderful colleagues. Cheers, Sam Sent from Windows Mail From: David Monermailto:dam...@gmail.com Sent: ?Friday?, ?19? ?June? ?2015 ?5?:?37? ?PM To: For openEHR clinical discussionsmailto:openehr-clini...@lists.openehr.org, For openEHR technical

Problem with version and specialisation

My take on this is that such archetypes need to be fairly inclusive and stable, using templates to constrain. There is no guarantee that versions will remain compatible. As revisions are only extensions, this should work. Versioning (breaking change for existing data , needs to be limited to

MedInfo 2015 openEHR tutorials

Hi Pablo I wonder if Jusara could organise a submeeting in an academic/industry forum prior to MedInfo? Cheers Sam Sent from Windows Mail From: pablo pazosmailto:pazospa...@hotmail.com Sent: ?Saturday?, ?2? ?August? ?2014 ?9?:?06? ?AM To: For openEHR clinical

MedInfo 2015 openEHR tutorials

Hi Pablo Great to hear from you and your plans for Medinfo 2015. I plan to come for the meeting and I am sure a lot of others do too. A group of openEHR implementers will be meeting in Istanbul before MIE on the Saturday afternoon (venue to be decided). I would hope that there will be

openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 18, Issue 37

based approaches may be suitable in 20 years, but will need to be based on the clinical models, not the other way around. Clinicians need to define what they want to record. My 2p - Cheers Sam Dr Sam Heard FRACGP, MRCGP, DRCOG, FACHI Chairman, Ocean Informatics Chairman, openEHR Foundation

Re: Regarding the use of the Demographics Package...

Hi Anthanasios - Heath has been doing something like that Sam Heard FRACGP, MRCGP, DRCOG, FACHI Consultant Chairman, Ocean Informatics Chairman, openEHR Foundation Chairman, NTGPE Senior Visiting Research Fellow, University College London From: Athanasios Anastasiou Sent: ?Monday?, ?1

TDS (and TDD) implementations?

. Cheers Sam Dr Sam Heard FRACGP, MRCGP, DRCOG, FACHI Chairman, Ocean Informatics Chairman, openEHR Foundation Chairman, NTGPE +61417838808 From: Daniel Karlssonmailto:daniel.karls...@liu.se Sent: ?14/?06/?2013 5:12 PM To: openehr-technical

Re: Trying to understand the openEHR Information Model

the openEHR data can be stored is still an experimental science. Ocean has an AQL parser which then queries the openEHR repository and is now optimised in a number of ways. Some of these are independent of the storage mechanism entirely. Cheers, Sam Sam Heard FRACGP, MRCGP, DRCOG, FACHI

Guideline Definition Language (GDL) specifications and GDL-editor release announcement

Congratulations Ring Thanks for taking such a great leading position with openEHR, which only gets stronger with time. We need to think about how to integrate this in the CKM space so the rules can be shared when appropriate. Cheers Sam Dr Sam Heard FRACGP, MRCGP, DRCOG, FACHI Chairman

RE: Guideline Definition Language (GDL) specifications and GDL-editor release announcement

| Hemsida:www.cambio.se From: openEHR-implementers [mailto:openehr-implementers-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Sam Heard Sent: 11 March 2013 22:04 To: For openEHR technical discussions; openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org; openehr-implementers at lists.openehr.org Subject: RE: Guideline

Questions about commit and AUDIT_DETAILS

Hi Pablo Sent from my iPad On 06/02/2013, at 7:55 AM, pablo pazos pazospablo at hotmail.com wrote: Hi Sam, reading more about this, it seems FEEDER_AUDIT_DETAILS is more for copying stuff from non-openEHR systems, but from your words I tend to think it can be used also as an audit to copy

Questions about commit and AUDIT_DETAILS

Hi Pablo One simple thing ? the FEEDER_AUDIT_DETAILS is there to let you record when something in this composition came from somewhere else. The AUDIT_DETAILs are what happened here. You do not need to record FEEDER_AUDIT but it can be helpful. You can log it if you want but then it is not

Questions about commit and AUDIT_DETAILS

Hi Bert I am sure the technical people will respond but it is a good question. The commit time is the time that the author committed it to the system. I believe this is usually generated on the server to ensure accuracy. When there is a system with considerable delay between the clinician

Problem with specialization using the Archetype Editor

Hi To specialise in the current AE, you open the parent and then File-specialise. Cheers, Sam -Original Message- From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Peter Gummer Sent: Friday, 11 January 2013 3:04 PM To: For openEHR technical

defaultValue/assumedValue in CPrimitive.

Hi All The reason we introduced the assumed value in the Observation.State was to deal with the fact that many variables may be introduced in regard to the state of the person when an observation is made - clothing, fasting, post-challenge, at rest, on exertion, asleep, upright/sitting/lying

csingleattribute and existence

Hi Bert I have been a little irritating about this in the past. The single attribute could be determined by occurrences but I am not sure of the downstream implications at this stage. My interest has been in existence as a constraint. Clearly everything is logically optional at any level

Questions about the XSD-files.

Hi Seref Only one XSD set from openEHR. If we upgrade it has to be formal. Cheers, Sam On 27/11/2012 2:43 AM, Seref Arikan wrote: Greetings, Did I get this right? There are XSDs on openEHR web site. There are also XSDs which are different than the first set, provided by LinkEHR. If these are

Commiting ACTIONs for the same INSTRUCTION ACTIVITY

Hi Pablo, You need to reversion the persistent composition without the medication in it. Ideally an action showing it has been ceased should be recorded in an event composition. Cries that help? Sam Sent from my phone On 12/09/2012, at 0:07, pablo pazos pazospablo at hotmail.com wrote: Hi

lessons from Intermountain Health, and starting work on openEHR 2.x

Hi Tom I absolutely agree with your summary. Technically I think making use of obsolescence is the appropriate way to go in software. No competent vendor will put out an operating system, compiler or software that breaks existing tools without doing the work for them. The point I am making is

What should AQL return in this case?

Hi All The work_flow_id of an entry provides a way to link any ENTRY with an INSTRUCTION. There are more complex workflow parameters possible within the ENTRY class that can be used if more complex issues arise. Relating ENTRYs in a general way outside a particular application or repository

HTML 5 Microdata

, Medications, Problems, Vaccinations, Weights, heights, blood pressures, temperatures etc. Interested in what others think. Cheers, Sam -- *Dr Sam Heard* /Chief Executive Officer/ Director, /open/EHR Foundation Senior Visiting Research Fellow, University College London 214 Victoria Avenue

Commiting ACTIONs for the same INSTRUCTION ACTIVITY

Hi All The openEHR specification is clear about the notion of update/versioning of a composition or creating a new event. The idea of a persistent composition is useful for information where new data ALWAYS makes previous data redundant not incorrect at the time (such as a medication list in

Triggering behaviour

Hi Isaac Just saw your post. The triggering rules could be based on the reference model alone but would be largely to do with access notification or the like - e.g. if the same user saves or reads more than 20 EHRs in an hour to stop the user access. All clinically oriented business rules need

Questions about the relationship between Instruction, workflow and Action

Hi Pablo, Comments in line Sent from my phone On 01/08/2012, at 15:39, pablo pazos pazospablo at hotmail.com wrote: Hi Sam, I'm reviving this thread :D I'm working on a project and we need to define a simple state machine, this is the way I think it should be done and it would be

HL7 ANY type

HI Bert Heath is away but he will share with you that we have been taking the same approach. LOINC codes or name values are the basis for our queries when there is no specific archetype. So we have the path to the values, but use the names of the elements for queries. Cheers, Sam On 10/07/2012

SMART platform and RDF

Hi Kathrin This is very exciting news and I look forward to catching up on this area. It has been attempted on a few occasions, I believe as the OWL tooling improves we are likely to see benefits. Cheers, Sam On 3/07/2012 8:29 PM, Kathrin Dentler wrote: Dear all, Here in Amsterdam we are

Regarding the role of ITEM_STRUCTURE

Hi Anthanasios I think time has shown that this is probably an area of over engineering in openEHR. All archetypes are now ITEM_TREE and could be clusters. If we think of these as providing constraint on an underlying cluster - ITEM_LIST is a cluster of ELEMENTs and ITEM_TABLE sets up a set of

13606 revisited - list proposal

Hi Graham The summary of the time series can be as structured as you like. No limit ? just archetypes. The fact that the first requirement you expressed was a graphic as part of the report, but it has never been archetyped. Protocol began as there is a lot of data about how information

Archetype authoring attribution

Hi David As the aim for all is interoperability of these things, I would hope that the information would be two way. I would suggest getting the new experts to comment on CKM and then derive a 13606 archetype (this is described in the 13606 standard). I would like that to be a future part of

Units, Quantities, etc

Hi All, I think the units database that we have as part of openEHR tooling allows for the addition of equivalent and language dependent expressions, as well as conversion where that is possible. How about we make that available somewhere to get this going. It does mean we are not beholden to

openEHR / FHIR data types cross analysis

;-) Grahame On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Sam Heard sam.heard at oceaninformatics.com wrote: Hi This is an interesting discussion. It seems that we might have hit the issue of defining data types independent of a reference model. In a reference model we do want to know

openEHR conference - proposal for Lake Bled, Slovenia 2012 - POLL

Hi Shinji We could not get sponsorship for the conference, which is a shame. For that reason it looks like that will not happen until we have Associates and some core funding. I would like to organise some Google handouts at different times each month - probably 3/month suiting Asia,

openEHR conference - proposal for Lake Bled, Slovenia 2012 - POLL

Hi Shinji We could not get sponsorship for the conference, which is a shame. For that reason it looks like that will not happen until we have Associates and some core funding. I would like to organise some Google handouts at different times each month - probably 3/month suiting Asia,

visualizing AQL result

Leykun The result of the query might be a table or some objects (as XML). The display of these needs to use a script - which I believe is available in the public domain. I will copy to Heath to ask about this. Cheers, Sam From: openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org

openEHR (local) terminologies

Hi Diego Rong has made this generally available - or it is in the download of the archetype editor. Cheers, Sam -Original Message- From: openehr-technical-bounces at lists.openehr.org [mailto:openehr- technical-bounces at lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Diego Bosc? Sent: Thursday, 1

openEHR (local) terminologies

Hi Diego Rong has made this generally available - or it is in the download of the archetype editor. Cheers, Sam -Original Message- From: openehr-technical-bounces at lists.openehr.org [mailto:openehr- technical-bounces at lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Diego Bosc? Sent: Thursday, 1

openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 67, Issue 34

Hi Tim HL7 Twittered about making things more openly available the other daydoes anyone have the link? Cheers, Sam -Original Message- From: openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org [mailto:openehr-technical- bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Timothy Cook Sent: Thursday, 23

openEHR / FHIR data types cross analysis

cross analysis Actually, Eiffel has nothing to do with it (I wrote my own date/time libraries based on ISO 8601 semantics). What I am influenced by is what I see in CKM and other repositories. openEHR CKM NEHTA CKM On 18/03/2012 21:00, Sam Heard wrote: Hi This is an interesting

Python / Django experience??

Hi, We started archetype development in the NHS using Subversion and it got in a real mess very quickly. As Pablo says the version and dependencies are not the same as in code. I think we need to consider what are the tools that are needed now to make openEHR more attractive to clinical

Python / Django experience??

Hi All I want to ensure that the technical possibilities do not overwhelm the clinical reality in this space. It is a very new space and, for interoperability and sharing of applications, we need to align ideas for shared data specifications as part of the process. It has been and remains

openEHR / FHIR data types cross analysis

Thanks Tom for this useful work. A couple of thoughts: 1) It might be worth explaining the need for DV_BOOLEAN - and not just use Boolean 2) The separation of date and time is not usual in computing languages at the moment and I would guess is a consideration - we certainly do not

DV_DURATION as ranges

Hi Tom and Diego, The reference workbench only has an interval constraint on duration as it is the logical constraint. If this is a point duration then it still expresses a range. Not sure if this has changed over time. Cheers, Sam -Original Message- From: openehr-technical-bounces at

Does XMLSerializer (java) create archetype slots with too much extra information?

Hi Diego This was the result of some overzealous efforts in the past (designed to make XML look verbose :-). The discussion has been about the fact that Occurrences does not need an includelower/upper and unbounded is not necessary as it can never be a constraint statement. The expression is new

13606 revisited - list proposal

Hi David While I agree with your sentiment as a technical guy, the fact is that sharing health information will be more important than the application space relatively soon. This is like document sharing now ? you can have the best word processor on the planet but if it doesn?t do word then it

Questions about the relationship between Instruction, workflow and Action

Hi Pablo, The design principles are that the Instruction should remain unaltered by people basing actions on this instructions ? as the action and instructions could be disconnected at any moment. For example, the instruction (medication order) should not be changed by anyone just to give a

Could YAML replace dADL as human readable AOM serialization format?

Hi All I am going to say it once more: If there is an expression on occurrences of '0..*' anywhere in ADL then it is an error, for that is not a constraint - and can only be wrong (ie the RM may have a narrower constraint). We just need a max int and a min int - both optional. I won't

occurrences and cardinality in ADL, XML, JSON

Hi All As ADL only states constraints there is no logical reason to include unbounded. So no constraint expressed = RM max. This is likely to be one or unbounded. Sent from my phone On 11/11/2011, at 5:11 AM, Thomas Beale thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com wrote: In the current ADL

openEHR course in spanish

Hi Pablo This looks excellent. There is some repetition but it is clear that you are providing an overview in the first classes and drilling down in later classes. I would suggest that you might actually introduce some of the tools a little earlier as people will have more fun if they can build

openEHR Archetypes Development

Hi Laura Thanks for the link. I am finding it very difficult to make head or tail of the pages and what it all means. The pages appear to have a very basic 13606 element at the top and then a heap of references including self references. Can you help at all? Cheers, Sam From:

Tools for collaborative working

on these matters - the point being that we really want to use one tool for one purpose across different programs if possible or appropriate. Even if the tool turns out not to be the best one at times, the uniformity will be very important going forward. Cheers, Sam Dr Sam Heard Chief Executive Officer

openEHR Transition: Web-based tools?

Hi Ian My interest is the pain we get as the tools get developed and tweaked as does ADL and multiple versions. Also, if we are to use Thomas' engine it should tip the balance a bit further as installing and updating numerous layers gets even more painful. Finally, web tools are easier to

EN/ISO 13606 openEHR - harmonisation possibilities

As Dipak has explained, the attribution in ISO is not available. I believe attribution is a distraction from the task - I have seen lots of slides from others used in this space and ideas transferred here and there. Let's appreciate all work and try and build on it efficiently. Cheers Sam

openEHR Transition: two procedural and one licensing question

procedural and one licensing question On 07/09/2011 21:46, Sam Heard wrote: Thanks Stef The previous Board did not want to make an error and use too loose a licence given that there is no going back. Our concern is that someone could specialize an archetype and claim copyright

openEHR Transition: two procedural and one licensing question

Well that may be true but government agencies and companies will want to know that no one has recourse to legal action if they use an archetype. Cheers Sam Sent from my phone On 09/09/2011, at 8:21 AM, Timothy Cook timothywayne.cook at gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 16:54, Sam Heard

openEHR Transition: two procedural and one licensing question

promotion. * Publish local activity directory for whom need to contact with them on the openEHR.org web. * Disallow to use openEHR name and logo whenf you think we are not worth to use. * Keep contact with local activities. Cheers, Shinji KOBAYASHI 2011/9/7 Sam Heard sam.heard

openEHR Transition: two procedural and one licensing question

Thanks Stef The previous Board did not want to make an error and use too loose a licence given that there is no going back. Our concern is that someone could specialize an archetype and claim copyright, or create a template and do the same. It is our intention at this stage to have a specific

openEHR Transition: two procedural and one licensing question

7, 2011 at 15:46, Sam Heard sam.heard at oceaninformatics.com wrote: Thanks Stef The previous Board did not want to make an error and use too loose a licence given that there is no going back. Our concern is that someone could specialize an archetype and claim copyright, or create a template

openEHR Transition: two procedural and one licensing question

, or is it's current state just a suggestion by Sam? On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 17:58, Sam Heard sam.heard at oceaninformatics.com wrote: [Sam Heard] The whitepaper was ratified by the participants in the planning process, the current Board (Profs. Kalra, Ingram and myself) and the new

openEHR Transition: two procedural and one licensing question

in openEHRs future. [Sam Heard] Getting the balance of top down governance and sponsorship and bottom up participation and 'ownership' is difficult and we have worked hard to get it right. This paper is seeking to set the scene and morph into one or more clear statements of intent. 1. First

openEHR Transition: two procedural and one licensing question

Thanks Diego [Sam Heard] This would be a step forward and would allow for slim and fat systems to offer the same basic calls. My suggestion is for the this point Begin an open source software project for tools, web-based if possible, to author archetypes, templates and terminology reference

openEHR Transition: two procedural and one licensing question

September 2011, Sam Heard sam.heard at oceaninformatics.com wrote: Thanks Diego [Sam Heard] This would be a step forward and would allow for slim and fat systems to offer the same basic calls. My suggestion is for the this point Begin an open source software project for tools, web-based

openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 49, Issue 12

Mahdi The ID needs to be the archetypeID not the archetype-node-ID if it is the root node of an archetype. Cheers, Sam -Original Message- From: openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org [mailto:openehr-technical- bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of mahdi.asgari at gmail.com Sent:

Use of Identifiers in archetypes

Hi There have been a few issues with DV_IDENTIFIER - largely that all fields are mandatory. This may mean that users puts stuff in that is not helpful. There is also no known set of things to use at any point although this could be expressed in a template (or archetype although this would not be

Issue with class PARTICIPATION. Should it be Locatable or Pathable?

Hi Justinas, My clinical input.. You are showing an impressive level of knowledge here and have hit an area where there is still debate. There are a number of requirements: 1. I think want to maintain the ability to add participations that are not archetyped. It is clear that

Clinical Documents, openEHR, 13606, CDA and CCR

in the composition. Other_participations may be the location for this with IDs that are referenced within the composition - but this is not the planned use and will need some consideration. Some may argue that this should be from the demographic model but I do not think so. Thoughts? Cheers, Sam

DV_QUANTITY or DV_DURATION?

Hi The advantage of duration is that time can be expressed in the usual way 2 months, 6 weeks, 2hr 30min, 5min 30sec etc. The Quantity has the advantage of being able to set a fixed unit. This is necessary sometimes and although this can be done with duration it is not really the focus. I think

openEHR-13606 harmonization CR regarding CLUSTER/TABLE etc and ENTRY/OBSERVATION (Was: ISO 21090 data types too complex?)

as possible; but no simpler. that you qoute on the philosophy part of http://www.oship.org/ On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 00:22, Sam Heard sam.heard at oceaninformatics.com wrote: ... 1. Restrict a cluster to a list; and 2. Create a consistent representation of tables which have allow pivots

Why is OpenEHR adoption so slow?

Hi All The adoption of all health standards is very slow; and it is universally so. Government eHealth programs have embraced HL7v3 or CDA or openEHR or 13606 - at great cost. Still things go slowly. The fact is that until people want a shared logical model of the actual EHR (rather than a

openEHR-13606 harmonization CR regarding CLUSTER/TABLE etc and ENTRY/OBSERVATION (Was: ISO 21090 data types too complex?)

Hi All The HISTORY class is an absolute godsend - could be a bit simpler but really it is one of the reasons openEHR is going ahead. Once people get to use the INSTRUCTION and ACTION classes there will be another leap of understanding. Our recent work with the instruction index is making managing

CR for openEHR RM - Clusters and Data structures

Dear All As an involved clinician I have been thinking about advantages of using inheritance to relate DATA_STRUCTURES and CLUSTER. This arises from two things we have learned in clinical modelling: 1) At almost every point where a DATA_STRUCTURE is currently specified in the RM it would

Archetypes and XML-Schemas

Hi Andrew This is not quite correct as we are talking about constraint. The default is what is in the RM. The three states are: 1. As in the RM - no statement 2. Required (optional in RM) 3. Prohibited (optional in RM) Is that sensible - Sam -Original Message- From:

How to express multiple composers for a composition with an history of events

Hi Leonardo, Two things. First, a composition does not relate to an encounter but rather a recording. So you could have a number of compositions for one encounter with the data entered by different people. Second, each ENTRY has an information provider which can be used to reference the source.

Term bindings in archetypes and templates

Hi, This is an interesting discussion. I think we need to keep a sense of purpose here in what we are doing. We need to understand that the complexity of biomedicine is probably unsurpassed and the language of health professionals is a way of dealing with this. It has historical roots which

Clarified semantics of CONTRIBUTION.audit.change_type

Hi The issue is that AUDIT_DETAILS is used for commit and for individual items. The vocabulary is designed for revision of COMPOSITIONS and not really for ATTESTATION (when there is no change) or CONTRIBUTION which may have multiple COMPOSITIONS. You approach seems fine but it does show that

data types and structures questions

Hi Sam Thanks for the reply. Are you pointing the interval classes? Regards Masoumeh _ --- On Sun, 12/20/09, Sam Heard sam.heard at oceaninformatics.com wrote: From: Sam Heard sam.he...@oceaninformatics.com Subject: RE: data types and structures questions To: openehr-technical

data types and structures questions

Hi Masoumeh There is a difficulty that arises with data that is not completely entered and being able to save it in the repository in that state. One could argue that it should all be entirely consistent, but it does mean that it is not so easy to use in reality. I am always arguing for a

openEHR community on Google Wave

Hi Erik Can you tell me what search capabilities you want in CKM that are not there. You can export a prot?g? ontology, all the archetypes and have all the search power we have thought of from the asset management platform. Unsearchable seems a little unfair. Cheers, Sam -Original

Why ISM_TRANSITION of an ACTION is mandatory?

Hi Pablo The resulting state of the activity (even if there is no instruction) needs to be recorded for information to work in a distributed environment. When you record an action the computer needs to know whether it is complete or not in relation to any instruction (recorded or not). If you are

MedInfo 2010

No private activity that I know of - Sam -Original Message- From: openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org [mailto:openehr-technical- bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Tim Cook Sent: 17 November 2009 14:43 To: For openEHR technical discussions Subject: MedInfo 2010 No News

CKM Icons

There was a page on a previous site for this - the archetype list had a link to it. Thomas may know where that is gone? Cheers, Sam From: openehr-technical-boun...@openehr.org [mailto:openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Lisa Thurston Sent: Thursday, 22 October 2009 10:57 AM

License and copyright of archetypes

Subject: Re: License and copyright of archetypes Hi Sam! On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 01:04, Sam Heard sam.heard at oceaninformatics.com wrote: Richard has raised the issue of people copyrighting forms and other derived works based on archetypes and perhaps claiming these cannot be copied

Modeling reference ranges

Hi Pablo The issue is that you do not see the reference model attributes in the archetype editor. A Quantity data type has a normal range and other reference ranges built in. We do not set the reference ranges in archetypes as these vary and archetypes are the absolute statement about things

ACME terminology

I asked Koray - no other source known. Sam -Original Message- From: openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org [mailto:openehr-technical- bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Soheil Hassas Yeganeh Sent: Thursday, 27 August 2009 5:16 PM To: For openEHR technical discussions Subject:

Concept Overload Caution

Hi everyone There are a lot of technical people who have volunteered as reviewers on CKM and we have had major input from a number of them. There will be more issues that arise when we have the first set of archetypes for publication to ensure consistency. There is no doubt that we all benefit

distributed development, governance and artefact identification for openEHR

Hi Tom, This is a good document - thanks. I have posted this to the clinical list as well. http://www.openehr.org/svn/specification/TRUNK/publishing/architecture/am/di st_dev_model.pdf My comments: Page 11: Current text: Archetypes based on different classes from the same information model to

distributed development, governance and artefact identification for openEHR

Hi Tom Another very thoughtful document. I have been involved to some degree in the discussion of this area over the years as have many others prior to this draft release. http://www.openehr.org/svn/specification/TRUNK/publishing/architecture/am/di st_dev_model.pdf This document suggests

[Fwd: [JIRA] Created: (SPEC-302) Translations embedded in the ADL are not efficient and should instead use 'gettext' catalogs.]

Hi All I think I have said it before but I think we need to see this managed at the publication level. CKM currently stores translations as distinct assets. This has a number of advantages: 1) Translations can be added, reviewed, accredited asynchronously for the same archetype 2)

[Fwd: [JIRA] Created: (SPEC-302) Translations embedded in the ADL are not efficient and should instead use 'gettext' catalogs.]

Hi Tim I am keen, as some others have said, that CKM manages this with users being able to get as many translations as they need when they download the archetype. The advantage with the approach is that you do not need the source language to translate using the archetype so you do not need to

Archetype-triggered events for CDSS

Congratulations - this is great news Tim. Keep up the good work. Cheers, Sam -Original Message- From: openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org [mailto:openehr-technical- bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Tim Cook Sent: Tuesday, 14 April 2009 8:56 PM To: For openEHR technical

Archetype-triggered events for CDSS

Hi Pariya We were really saying that it is possible to write AQL statements (or Xpath) against archetypes to test if the last bp.systolic 140 mmHg for instance. This is due to the fact that the archetype makes it quite straightforward to ask such questions. A number of recent posts have

Why is the editor not opening ADL files?

Hi William I think this may have been answered elsewhere. The reference model for this archetype is the openEHR demographic model and it is starting to get some interest. It is still a research work in progress. These archetypes where hand built to illustrate ADL working with another model.

AQL queries and one-many relationships

[at1004]/data[at0003]/items[at0004]/value/value = 140 This query attempts to find all Systolic readings for Paradox and Postural Change blood pressure events where the Systolic reading for either is = 140. [Sam Heard] These would usually be 0-30 or so but As there is a one-to-many

AQL queries and one-many relationships

The contains statement is like a join. It is the association of containment which is very useful in longitudinal records. Cheers, Sam -Original Message- From: openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org [mailto:openehr-technical- bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Greg Caulton Sent: 25

  1   2   3   >