Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [release] OpenFlow broken in master

I think Anil and Tom needed certain order of merging blueprint patches - first these 2 patches in openflowjava - then some in openflowplugin, etc. Is that related to the OFP patches not having been merged yet? On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Luis Gomez wrote: > It seems the

[openflowplugin-dev] OpenFlow Plugin meeting moved to Thursdays 8 am Pacific

So no meeting on Monday. You can find the meeting info in usual places like https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Weekly_Project_Meeting_List or the OF Plugin wiki. ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org

[openflowplugin-dev] OpenFlow Plugin Meeting Minutes June 6, 2016

- Browser Friendly format meeting minutes: -

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [nic-dev] [release] [didm-dev] OFP getTableFeature() breakage in nic and didm

Yes. From what I remember - the model changes were not in the last Beryllium SR (i.e. SR 2) - so the release note of SR3 should have this. On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Robert Varga wrote: > On 05/25/2016 07:43 AM, Anil Vishnoi wrote: > > So looks like these yang model changes >

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [release] [didm-dev] [nic-dev] OFP getTableFeature() breakage in nic and didm

obably not able to find the > table features and failing. I am looking into it, and push the patch as > soon as i fix it. > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','abhijitk...@gmail.com');>> wrote: > &

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [nic-dev] [release] [didm-dev] OFP getTableFeature() breakage in nic and didm

ult plugin, given that table features > are by default disabled there. > > I would like to get thoughts from the people on which way we should go (1) > disable the table features by default or (2) enable and keep the existing > behavior > > My vote is for (1) for the reason i me

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] TSDR and OpenFlowPlugin Li Migration

> vote 'GO' in the spreadsheet. > > Thanks, > > YuLing > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 2:03 PM, YuLing Chen <yulingche...@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','yulingche...@gmail.com');>> wrote: > >> OK, Thanks. >> YuLing >> >> On Tue, Ma

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [controller-dev] Openflow ID vs Datapath ID

Adding OpenFlow plugin. On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Rajasekaran, Monica < monica.rajaseka...@us.fujitsu.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > > I have configured the datapath ID of my OVS and it is displayed correctly > on the OVS side. How is this different from the openflow id displayed on > the ODL

[openflowplugin-dev] New OpenFlow Plugin meeting time from next week June 2 - Thursdays 8 am Pacific

OpenFlow Plugin project. Thanks, Abhijit -- Forwarded message -- From: Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com> Date: Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:38 PM Subject: New meeting time - Thursdays 8 am Pacific? To: "openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org" < openflowplugin

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Weather report: changing default design for OpenFlow plugin on master branch to Li design from He design by June 21

Reminder: we would like to merge this in the next day or two. On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Folks, > > We would be changing the default design of the OpenFlow plugin on the > master branch from the original (i.e. He des

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Weather report: changing default design for OpenFlow plugin on master branch to Li design from He design by June 21

& Shuva! On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Reminder: we would like to merge this in the next day or two. > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Folks, >>

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [release] Weather report: changing default design for OpenFlow plugin on master branch to Li design from He design by June 21

> I will take of both in the next hours. > > BR/Luis > > > > On Jun 22, 2016, at 9:17 AM, Robert Varga <n...@hq.sk> wrote: > > > > On 06/22/2016 05:59 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare wrote: > >> We have merged the change - so now we are default Li design! >

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Agenda slot at OFP meeting Thur

Sure - sounds good. On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Leckey, Alexander J < alexander.j.lec...@intel.com> wrote: > Abhijit, > > > > Could I request 10mins at the end of your regular agenda at the OFP weekly > call to discuss our NetIDE patch[1]? > > We believe we’ve address all comments, but a

[openflowplugin-dev] OpenFlow Plugin Meeting Minutes June 23, 2016

- Browser Friendly format meeting minutes: -

[openflowplugin-dev] Weather report: changing default design for OpenFlow plugin on master branch to Li design from He design by June 21

Folks, We would be changing the default design of the OpenFlow plugin on the master branch from the original (i.e. He design) to the new(er) design (i.e. Li design) on Tuesday. If things get broken in your application/project due to the change - please raise a blocker bug as well as inform the

[openflowplugin-dev] OpenFlow Plugin M4 status

OpenFlow Plugin 1. Please provide updates on any previously-incomplete items from prior milestone readouts. Done (weather report sent to swap the plugin designs) 2. Has your project achieved API freeze such that all externally accessible Stable or Provisional APIs will not be modified after

[openflowplugin-dev] OpenFlow Plugin Meeting Minutes June 16, 2016

- Browser Friendly format meeting minutes: -

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] NetIDE patch comments

Alec, Thanks for presenting and following up. Wish we could have time to conclude the discussion during the call. Folks - please provide your feedback. I believe Anil's suggestion regarding it being a separate feature was resolved based on your explanation - but he can chime in. Thanks, Abhijit

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] OF-Plugin Designs Comparison

Thanks for sending this comparison Shuva/Muthu/Bhalaji. On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 4:20 AM, Shuva Jyoti Kar < shuva.jyoti@ericsson.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > > Please find attached the ppt on plugin comparison for today’s call > > > > Thanks > > Shuva > >

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Request for a vote from the OFP committers on recommending Li design for Be SR 1

; wrote: > >> Hi , >> >> My vote is Yes. >> >> Thx >> Kamal >> >> >> From: <openflowplugin-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org> on behalf of >> Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com> >> Date: Monday, February 1, 2016 a

[openflowplugin-dev] OpenFlow Plugin Meeting Minutes Feb 22

- Browser Friendly format meeting minutes: -

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [release] OF-Plugin dependent projects migration plan to Li design in the service releases

in an SR that could >> damage our reputation with users for some time to come. >> >> I don't think it necessarily prohibits doing this, but it's certainly >> something to carefully consider. >> >> --Colin >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Abhi

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [release] OF-Plugin dependent projects migration plan to Li design in the service releases

ith the motivation to consolidate on a single implementation. > I just worry about breaking the contract we have with people consuming our > releases. > > I look forward to discussing options at the developer design forum. > > --Colin > On Feb 24, 2016 1:37 PM, "Abhijit Kumbha

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Please don't Delay - Register For the OpenDaylight Boron Developer Forum *Now*

Thanks Phil. Several of us from OpenFlow Plugin will be there - including at the minimum Anil, Kamal & Shuva. On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Phil Robb <pr...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Hello Abhijit Kumbhare and the openflowplugin development team: > > > If you

[openflowplugin-dev] No weekly meeting today due to DDF

We do have the discussion session at the design forum in San Mateo tomorrow at 9:20 am ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [controller-dev] FlowCapableInventoryProvider - Thread Dies

Yes - please add a bug. On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:08 AM, Anil Vishnoi wrote: > Hi Guy, > > Can you please open a bug here for the issue > https://bugs.opendaylight.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=openflowplugin > > Thanks > Anil > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Sela, Guy

[openflowplugin-dev] Fwd: [release] OpenDaylight Beryllium Released

Hello OpenFlow Plugin, I would like to thank all of you for your efforts in helping in the release of OpenFlow Plugin for Beryllium - and by that extension the OpenDaylight Beryllium release. There was a lot of work from many of you - Anil, Hari, Jozef, Kamal, Kavitha, Michal, Muthu, Renato,

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] OFP-Li and OFP-He in Beryllium SRs

I think it is good to move to Li plugin but not before > we fix some of the stability and cluster issues it has. > > BR/Luis > > On Feb 19, 2016, at 5:16 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','abhijitk...@gmail.com');>> wrote: >

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] OpenFlow Plugin & Dependent Projects Planning Session Slides

you share any detailed plan or design? I think Openflowplugin Flow > Programmer I did has overlap with this. > > > > What Openflow resource Will “OpenFlow Resource Manager” manage? > > > > *From:* openflowplugin-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto: > openflowplugin-

[openflowplugin-dev] OF-Plugin dependent projects migration plan to Li design in Boron - not in Be SRs

ple consuming our >> releases. >> >> I look forward to discussing options at the developer design forum. >> >> --Colin >> On Feb 24, 2016 1:37 PM, "Abhijit Kumbhare" <abhijitk...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Addressing the genera

[openflowplugin-dev] OpenFlow Plugin & Dependent Projects Planning Session Slides

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1h96mGvKipI_QKRdkmKpU3EAELY6LxCgahraT81F1tZU/edit?usp=sharing ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/openflowplugin-dev

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Integrating modified Openflowplugin source code with ODL

Senthil - other than Kamal's suggestion - why not upgrade to use Beryllium? Also make your changes on the master? On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Kamal Rameshan (kramesha) < krame...@cisco.com> wrote: > Hi Senthil, > > If I understand you correctly, I assume you made changes in the code and >

[openflowplugin-dev] OpenFlow Plugin Committers (M1 requirement): Self nomination for Project Lead & Contacts (Documentation, Test and project) by March 15, 5 pm Pacific

Hi folks, As part of the M1 requirements - we need to have the following in place for M1: project lead, project contact, test contact and documentation contact. I propose a self nomination period from now to Tuesday March 15, 5 pm Pacific. If there are multiple candidates we can have the election

[openflowplugin-dev] [Action Needed] OPENFLOWPLUGIN Beryllium SR1 Distribution Test Failures

>>>>Hi Jamo, I think this is related to cbench installation in >> mininet Ubuntu VM, can you confirm? >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>>Begin forwarded message: >> >>>>> >> >>>>&g

[openflowplugin-dev] TSC Vote Request to approve Jozef Bacigal as OpenFlow Plugin committer

, 2016 at 11:32 PM Subject: RE: [openflowplugin-dev] Vote for Jozef Bacigal as OpenFlow Plugin committer To: "Kamal Rameshan (kramesha)" <krame...@cisco.com>, Anil Vishnoi < vishnoia...@gmail.com>, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com> Cc: "openflowplugin-dev

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] PLEASE READ: OpenFlow Plugin default design migration to Lithium

m either having issues or no issues? > > --Colin > > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> Since in today's TWS there were not many project leads and committers of >> the dependent projec

[openflowplugin-dev] OpenFlow Plugin Meeting Agenda

1. Discuss the dependent projects and their issues: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zImtd764e-hOgJAxoJKl85fxHCPu2agLfqsBtf13zQY/edit#gid=251530127 2. Discuss the inventory to topology migration conclusion of the discussion ___

[openflowplugin-dev] OpenFlow Plugin Meeting Minutes April 11, 2016

- Browser Friendly format meeting minutes: -

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] TSDR and OpenFlowPlugin Li Migration

ote "GO" or "NOGO" and identify > any bugs/issues pending at this spreadsheet [3], including the issues you > mentioned in your email below with regards to the openflow statistics > collector. > > Your feedback is greatly appreciated. Please do not hesitate to

[openflowplugin-dev] OpenFlow Plugin M1 Status

OpenFlow Plugin Project 1. Offset: 1 2. Project Lead: Abhijit Kumbhare; Email: abhijitk...@gmail.com or abhijit.kumbh...@ericsson.com; IRC: abhijitkumbhare 3. Project Contact: Abhijit Kumbhare; Email: abhijitk...@gmail.com or abhijit.kumbh...@ericsson.com; IRC: abhijitkumbhare 4. Test Contact

[openflowplugin-dev] OpenFlow Plugin Meeting Minutes - March 21

- Browser Friendly format meeting minutes: -

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Beryllium SR1 issue with OVS 2.4 - bug 5464

re exposing lazy data > tree. > > > > Regards, > > Michal > > > -- > *From:* Luis Gomez <ece...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Monday, March 21, 2016 17:23 > *To:* Michal Rehak -X (mirehak - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) > *Cc:* Abhij

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [Opendaylight-users] Where are these "default" flows coming from?

Is that a switch (router) reboot or the reboot / restart of ODL? The reconciliation feature in Beryllium should take care of the switch reboot, while having persistence enabled and I believe the flows in the config datastore should be able to take care of the ODL restart. On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at

[openflowplugin-dev] Existing committers - active Boron involvement?

Hi OpenFlow Plugin committers, I hope to see good contributions from your side in the Boron release. However I understand if some of you may not have the time commitment for the project you previously had. Hence I would like to solicit your input regarding whether you plan to be active in the

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Bug-4117, Bug 5464

Thanks for a detailed explanation Jozef and Michal. Need to digest it more - but a quick question: is this the best way for 4117? Do we need to tweak the way a bit? What about the new recommendation that was provided by the MD-SAL team to use the data tree change listener (DTCL) instead of the

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Bug 5602 - Problems to detect the removal of flow entries

I have updated the title to start with the words: "Li Migration: ". On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Tai, Hideyuki wrote: > Hi OpenFlow Plugin project folks, > > Could you take a look at the following bug? > https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5602 > This is

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Configure switch capabilities

Alexis, May not be a bad idea - for optional capabilities. Which of the capabilities would you like to turn default off and which default on? Thanks, Abhijit On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Alexis de Talhouët wrote: > Hello OFP-dev, > > I can see here that all switch

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Delay in notifications

switch when I use openflowplugin-Ii. > > Regards, > Chris > > On 04 Mar 2016, at 01:45, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','abhijitk...@gmail.com');>> wrote: > > Thanks Luis. But I think his message (unexpected rpc response in > Get

[openflowplugin-dev] OF Extensions sub project

Hi Aneesha, Guy and Gal are interested in understanding the repo details of the circuit switching sub project under OF extensions as they want to understand their options for some other extension. Can you please shed light on ofextensions/circuitsw repo etc.? I am not sure if they want it as a

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Fw : OpenFlowPlugin meeting Eviction/Vacancy

y Pande Gaurav/DEL/TCS on 02/16/2016 09:35AM - > To: Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijit.kumbh...@ericsson.com> > From: Pande Gaurav/DEL/TCS > Date: 12/17/2015 02:35PM > Cc: Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com>, Anil Vishnoi < > vishnoia...@gmail.com>, "K

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [groupbasedpolicy-dev] PLEASE READ: OpenFlow Plugin default design migration to Lithium

> > > *From:* groupbasedpolicy-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto: > groupbasedpolicy-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] *On Behalf Of *Abhijit > Kumbhare > *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2016 2:41 PM > *To:* Colin Dixon; Release; <disc...@lists.opendaylight.org>

[openflowplugin-dev] Cancelling OpenFlow Plugin meeting today due to Easter holiday for many

Folks, Cancelling the meeting today - as many folks seem to have the Easter holiday. Let's continue talking over the email. Thanks, Abhijit ___ openflowplugin-dev mailing list openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org

[openflowplugin-dev] PLEASE READ: OpenFlow Plugin default design migration to Lithium

dixon.com> wrote: > I've added it here: > > https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Tech_Work_Stream:Main#Upcoming_Meeting_Agendas > > --Colin > > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Sounds good to me.

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] table features

Hi Jozef, Will you be putting https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/36559 into stable/beryllium after sometime has passed or do you think its better to avoid it altogether in stable/beryllium? Thanks, Abhijit On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Subhash Singh <

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] L2switch Li issues

is Gomez" <ece...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >Hi Amit, the idea we discussed in the l2switch call is to combine both: >>> ofplugin patch to change features [1] + l2switch patch do deal with new >>> plugin [2]. For that we had to remove any feature change in

[openflowplugin-dev] OpenFlow Plugin M3 status

OpenFlow Plugin Functionality Freeze: 1. Final list of externally consumable APIs defined: Yes 2. Are all your inter-project dependencies resolved (i.e., have the other projects you were counting on given you what you needed)? Yes 3. Were there any project-specific deliverables planned

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] New meeting time - Thursdays 8 am Pacific?

; > On 05/23/2016 04:24 PM, Anil Vishnoi wrote: > > Abhijit, please clearly mention for the record that i agreed to that > slot "for a case of beer at the start of every month" :-P > > In that case, I would also like to agree to this time slot :) > > JamO > >

[openflowplugin-dev] OpenFlow Plugin Meeting Minutes May 23, 2016

- Browser Friendly format meeting minutes: -

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] table features

k we all agreed put this fix only on > master because it change the default behavior. > > Jozef > > *From:* Abhijit Kumbhare [mailto:abhijitk...@gmail.com > <abhijitk...@gmail.com>] > *Sent:* 11. mája 2016 8:33 > *To:* Jozef Bacigal -X (jbacigal - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES a

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Openflowplugin Patch

Guiseppe, Adding the OpenFlow Plugin mailing list. Probably - but I see you are adding it on the old design which is going to be switched out during the Boron release. You will need to look under the new design - or what used to be known as the Lithium design which is under openflowplugin-impl

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [release] Beryllium SR2 Status 5/4

t; 38369 needs to be rebased so that it doesn't depend on other unsubmitted > patches. > > Regards, > Thanh > > > > On 5 May 2016 at 14:17, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Since the TSC decision is to respin, I have +2'ed >> https://git.o

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [OpenDaylight TSC] [release] Beryllium SR2 Status 5/4

n <jluhr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > can we rebase and merge (just 38369) and get a respin and let the tests > > run, just as a head start; in case the answer from Joezf is that we don't > > need the other patches? > > > > JamO > > > > On 05/05/201

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] LACP project dependency

Acknowledged for OpenFlow Plugin. On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 11:05 PM, wrote: > Hi, > > > > The LACP project depends on the below mentioned projects. > > · MD-SAL > > · Openflowplugin > > > > Requesting the respective project representatives to acknowledge

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] GBP dependencies

lt;mailto:tc...@cisco.com>>, "netconf-...@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:netconf-...@lists.opendaylight.org>" <netconf-...@lists.opendaylight.org<mailto:netconf-...@lists.opendaylight.org>>, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijit.kumbh...@ericsson.com<mailt

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [release] [OpenDaylight TSC] Beryllium SR2 Status 5/4

t;> >> Jozef >> >> >> >> *From:* release-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto: >> release-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] *On Behalf Of *Abhijit Kumbhare >> *Sent:* 5. mája 2016 23:38 >> *To:* An Ho <an...@huawei.com> >> *Cc:* t...@lis

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [release] [OpenDaylight TSC] Beryllium SR2 Status 5/4

will be any potential test concerns? > > > > Best Regards, > > An Ho > > > > *From:* release-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto: > release-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] *On Behalf Of *Abhijit Kumbhare > *Sent:* Thursday, May 05, 2016 12:05

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] VPNService project dependency

Acknowledged. On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Prem sankar G wrote: > Hi, > > VPNService would depend on the following projects: > > > > - Openflow plugin > > - OVSDB > > - Netvirt (spin-out from VPNService and hence new dependency in >

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] table features

dly - if the table features performance fix is already available & since the next SR is a few months away - do you think it would be better to just pull the actual fix from master once we know there are no side effects? Thanks, Abhijit On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 7:22 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Flow ID in operational

Yes. On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Anil Vishnoi <vishnoia...@gmail.com> wrote: > By same mechanism you mean, using the same format for the flow-id creation? > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> In-line. &

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [L2switch-dev] Flow ID in operational

gt; of flows that are installed through RPC to prevent any nasty bugs. > > > > Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 15:31:15 -0700 > > From: Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','abhijitk...@gmail.com');>> > > To: Anil Vishnoi <vishnoia

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Regression detected

Thanks for finding it Luis! Tomas - can you please revert your fix and revisit it? On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Luis Gomez wrote: > This patch: > > https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/36740/ > > Seems to impact system test for Li plugin: > > >

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [OpenDaylight Discuss] OF 1.4 support

Added OpenFlow plugin mailing list. No - it does not provide the support for OpenFlow 1.4. It is also not in the Boron plan (September 2016) - but perhaps in a future release it may be added. On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 2:11 PM, PUZZLE wrote: > Hi, > does OpenDaylight

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [OpenDaylight Discuss] Cbench against ODL

+1. Added OpenFlow Plugin and integration team. On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Rob Sherwood wrote: > As the guy who wrote/started cbench, I would ask why you want to run it? > > Cbench is very good at doing I/O testing of a controller but doesn't > really represent

[openflowplugin-dev] OpenFlow Plugin Meeting Minutes May 9, 2016

- Browser Friendly format meeting minutes: - http://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-openflowplugin/2016/openflow_plugin_may_9__2016/o

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] L2Switch Project Dependency

Ack. On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Sai MarapaReddy wrote: > Hi Team, > > L2switch project depends on the following project: > > * OpenFlow Plugin > > > We'd like to get the acknowledgement from the project. > > > > Regards, > Sai MarapaReddy > Brocade

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [ovsdb-dev] NetVirt Project Dependencies - Boron Release

Ack from OpenFlow plugin. On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Sam Hague wrote: > Hi, > > would representatives from the following projects respond with an > acknowledgement of NetVirt's dependence on them: > > - ovsdb > - genius > - neutron northbound > - openflowplugin > >

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [release] [didm-dev] didm-hp module failing to compile

Thanks Alexis & Anandhi! On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Manikantan, Anandhi < anandhi.manikan...@hpe.com> wrote: > Hi Subhash, > > > > I reviewed the code and comments. Alex has responded to the comments and > feels that this needs to be tested before merge. > > Since I don’t have the setup

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [OpenDaylight Discuss] Important: Inventory model migration proposal (instead of inventory to topology model migration)

In-line. On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Robert Varga <n...@hq.sk> wrote: > On 05/02/2016 11:52 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > [snip] > > > This will require some change by the dependent projects (some > > modifications in the dependen

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] OpenFlow Plugin Meeting Minutes May 9, 2016

> > So what is next step for https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/37937/ ? > > > > *From:* openflowplugin-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto: > openflowplugin-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] *On Behalf Of *Abhijit > Kumbhare > *Sent:* Tuesday, M

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] TSDR and OpenFlowPlugin Li Migration

ty of the data broker. > > Thanks, > > YuLing > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Sharon, >> >> I assume you guys have worked around this - since you have not raised a >> bug or let us know the exac

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Vote to add Shuva Jyoti Kar as OpenFlow Plugin committer

tive committers listed on the OpenFlow plugin main page). On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 from my side as well. So out of the committers we have Abhijit, Anil, > Hema, Jozef & Kamal voting +1 - which is a majority (5 of the 6 active

[openflowplugin-dev] Request for approval of Shuva Jyoti Kar as OpenFlow Plugin committer

us:merged [2] In-flight commits: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/q/owner:shuva.jyoti.kar%2540ericsson.com+status:pending -- Forwarded message -- From: Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:40 AM Subject: Re: Vote to add Shuva Jyoti Kar

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] OPENFLOWPLUGIN Beryllium SR3 Distribution Test Failures

I re-triggered to see if this is an sporadic or > a real issue. > > BR/Luis > > > On Jul 26, 2016, at 10:11 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','abhijitk...@gmail.com');>> wrote: > > Both are classified as non-critical (as

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] “select” type for group tables?

"Select" should be just a group type like "all" or "indirect" as far as OpenFlow Plugin is concerned - I doubt if there is any logic inside of the OpenFlow Plugin regarding the different group types. I would think the logic to make use of what the group type is should be in the application using

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] OPENFLOWPLUGIN Beryllium SR3 Distribution Test Failures

] > > Which makes me think the issue could be in the cbench tool or the network > in between. > > BR/Luis > > > > On Jul 26, 2016, at 8:17 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > Thanks! > > > &g

[openflowplugin-dev] OpenFlow Plugin Meeting Minutes, July 14, 2016

- Browser Friendly format meeting minutes: -

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] webex for todays hand over 7/27/16

Jozef, On your request we had decided in the meeting to do the hand over during the current OpenFlow Plugin meeting only this week & continue into the next week. You had preferred to fix the bugs/issues this week. So I am not sure we will have folks present today. Thanks, Abhijit On Wed, Jul

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Request for approval of Shuva Jyoti Kar as OpenFlow Plugin committer

Can we bring this up for a vote in the TSC meeting Thursday July 28? On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello TSC, > > The OpenFlow Plugin project has voted to approve Shuva Jyoti Kar as an > OpenFlow Plugin committer. We have A

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Updated meeting space: ODL OpenFlow Plugin Mtg

Robb via Cisco WebEx <ad...@webex.com> wrote: > [image: Cisco WebEx] <https://meetings.webex.com> > > Hi Abhijit Kumbhare, > > Phil Robb updated content in the WebEx meeting space ODL OpenFlow Plugin > Mtg > <https://meetings.webex.com/collabs/url/lGtXPXbP

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] openflowplugin bug-scub

Thanks Shuva! On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Shuva Jyoti Kar < shuva.jyoti@ericsson.com> wrote: > Hi Devs, > > > > I have updated the bugzilla with the status for Bug4117. Only one review > is pending to be merged. > > > > https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/39967/ - Probably

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Flow comparison

e is safe. >>>> >>>> >>>> Decisions >>>> ==== >>>> 1. We could fall back on the HE solution >>>> 2. We could continue with my patch which is imperfect but seems to >>>> cover more cases than the He plugin soluti

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [integration-dev] OpenFlow tests for next ODL perf paper

Hi Luis, I was discussing with our OpenFlow team (Manohar/Muthu/Shuva/Vinayak) today about the tests - and one of the things which would be very interesting would be the bulk-o-matic with small/medium/large configs (same as your test 2) and the following combinations: 1. Lithium design + the old

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] OPENFLOWPLUGIN Beryllium SR3 Distribution Test Failures

Both are classified as non-critical (as per the test case) - but Luis can answer better. First one is a create JVM plot fail (so should not be critical) but has a message that will need to be reviewed (including whether that particular test should be just rerun): ConnectionError:

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] “select” type for group tables?

gt; openflowplugin-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] *On Behalf Of *Abhijit > Kumbhare > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 26, 2016 12:26 PM > *To:* Jan Medved (jmedved) > *Cc:* openflowplugin-dev@lists.opendaylight.org > *Subject:* Re: [openflowplugin-dev] “select” type for group tables? > > &g

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Patch for tuning table features

her set of test suites which require this value to be >>> false (everything else other than NIC or DIDM) >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Muthu >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Tom Pante

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Any update on these?

tized though. > > > > BR/Luis > > > > > > > >> On Aug 2, 2016, at 2:22 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com > <mailto:abhijitk...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> > >> Maybe file a bug? On OpenFlow Java I guess. > >> >

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/42702/

Shlomi, Slava, What is the status of this patch? I have sent an API waiver. I see a -1 from Anil today - as well as some updates from you. Thanks, Abhijit On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Shlomi, > > I will shortly send an API

[openflowplugin-dev] Table features off by default - to be enabled by DIDM & NIC

jozef.baci...@pantheon.tech] > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 03, 2016 12:32 PM > *To:* Abhijit Kumbhare; Anil Vishnoi; openflowplugin-dev@lists. > opendaylight.org > *Cc:* Tom Pantelis; Muthukumaran K; Shuva Jyoti Kar; Luis Gomez; > didm-...@lists.opendaylight.org; nic-...@lists.opendayli

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] openflowplugin issue observed in CI

Yes - we will do that. On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Anil Vishnoi wrote: > Hi Abhijit/Luis, > > Let's track these bugs in our weekly meetings. > > Thanks > Anil > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 9:17 PM, Luis Gomez wrote: > >> The status of the plugin in

Re: [openflowplugin-dev] Bug 5539 - Remove deprecated model

dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org < > openflowplugin-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org> on behalf of Tai, > Hideyuki <hideyuki@necam.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 19, 2016 7:06 PM > *To:* Anil Vishnoi; Miroslav Macko; Shuva Jyoti Kar; Abhijit Kumbhare; > openflowplugin-dev@lists

  1   2   3   4   >