On 8/08/2019 8:23 pm, Aurélien Larcher wrote:
Now that the version in oi-userland was bumped to 2019 you can probably
update without doing anything.
Yes!
carl@testy:~$ beadm list
BEActive Mountpoint Space Policy Created
oi2019.04 - - 13.0M
On 8/08/2019 8:23 pm, Aurélien Larcher wrote:
Now that the version in oi-userland was bumped to 2019 you can probably
update without doing anything.
root@testy:~# pkg image-update --be-name oi20190808
Packages to install: 50
Packages to update: 623
Mediators
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 2:32 PM Carl Brewer wrote:
> On 23/07/2019 9:55 pm, Aurélien Larcher wrote:
> > You can create a new BE, remove the offending package after relaxing the
> > incorporation, then update.
> > I did that on my server.
>
> Ok, really dumb question, are there instructions for
On 23/07/2019 9:55 pm, Aurélien Larcher wrote:
You can create a new BE, remove the offending package after relaxing the
incorporation, then update.
I did that on my server.
Ok, really dumb question, are there instructions for how to do this
somewhere?
You can create a new BE, remove the offending package after relaxing the
incorporation, then update.
I did that on my server.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 5:00 AM Carl Brewer wrote:
> Aurelian? Can I fix this? Or do I need a reinstall somehow?
>
>
> >> Yes the problem is that my testing ISO
Aurelian? Can I fix this? Or do I need a reinstall somehow?
Yes the problem is that my testing ISO included zstd support in
illumos-gate and Michal added it afterwards in userland.
Given that, what's the best way to shuffle it so a pkg update will work?
I still have your testing images
On 20/07/2019 12:17 am, Aurélien Larcher wrote:
So,
pkg://userland/system/extended-system-utilities@0.5.11
,5.11-2018.99.0.17921:20181107T193628Z
is wrong.
The correct one would be
pkg://
openindiana.org/system/extended-system-utilities@0.5.11-2018.0.0.18800:20190718T014942Z
at the moment.
It
On 07/19/19 04:17 PM, Aurélien Larcher wrote:
Yes the problem is that my testing ISO included zstd support in
illumos-gate and Michal added it afterwards in userland.
Aurélien,
do you remember which (ACPI?) patches was that? I thought they were
https://www.illumos.org/issues/9822
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 8:24 AM Andreas Wacknitz wrote:
> Am 19.07.19 um 01:24 schrieb Carl Brewer:
> > On 18/07/2019 6:43 pm, Andreas Wacknitz wrote:
> >
> >> Yep, as I wrote: you have freed most constraints with these two
> >> uninstalled packages.
> >> You should also be able to update your
On 19/07/2019 4:23 pm, Andreas Wacknitz wrote:
but I fear that the final result, when all old package have been
removed, you will end in
a non-bootable situation, if I understand correctly that you need ACPI
patches on your system that are not available yet.
Yes, I think I do.
Given that
Am 19.07.19 um 01:24 schrieb Carl Brewer:
> On 18/07/2019 6:43 pm, Andreas Wacknitz wrote:
>
>> Yep, as I wrote: you have freed most constraints with these two
>> uninstalled packages.
>> You should also be able to update your system to bring it to the newest
>> version:
>> pkg update -v
>>
>> You
On 19/07/2019 3:54 pm, Michal Nowak wrote:
Yep! All for a compression library, it seems.
Not zstd but pkg://userland/system/extended-system-utilities is your
problem. See the "userland" publisher in the FMRI?
Disable the userland publisher and retry.
It already is :
root@testy:~# pkg
On 07/19/19 01:24 AM, Carl Brewer wrote:
On 18/07/2019 6:43 pm, Andreas Wacknitz wrote:
Yep, as I wrote: you have freed most constraints with these two
uninstalled packages.
You should also be able to update your system to bring it to the newest
version:
pkg update -v
You should be aware of
On 18/07/2019 6:43 pm, Andreas Wacknitz wrote:
Yep, as I wrote: you have freed most constraints with these two
uninstalled packages.
You should also be able to update your system to bring it to the newest
version:
pkg update -v
You should be aware of the intended behavior of the
Hi Carl
Yes that was a mistake from my side I was confusing the
install-incorporation with metapackages/gui-install which installs the
Installer into the live system.
Greetings
Till
On 18.07.19 10:01, Carl Brewer wrote:
> On 18/07/2019 5:46 pm, Till Wegmüller wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> It is best to
Am 18.07.19 um 09:50 schrieb Carl Brewer:
> On 18/07/2019 5:38 pm, Andreas Wacknitz wrote:
>
>>>
>> This is the correct one and, at least in theory, old settings shouldn't
>> interfere here. But as I see it your situation proves it wrong.
>> My best guess is that there is at least one old package
On 18/07/2019 6:01 pm, Carl Brewer wrote:
On 18/07/2019 5:46 pm, Till Wegmüller wrote:
Hi
It is best to remove the install-incorporation. It should have been
removed during the Installation Process but has not. And it is definetly
blocking your update.
pkg uninstall install-incorporation
It
On 18/07/2019 5:46 pm, Till Wegmüller wrote:
Hi
It is best to remove the install-incorporation. It should have been
removed during the Installation Process but has not. And it is definetly
blocking your update.
pkg uninstall install-incorporation
It doesn't like that one!
root@testy:~# pkg
On 18/07/2019 5:38 pm, Andreas Wacknitz wrote:
This is the correct one and, at least in theory, old settings shouldn't
interfere here. But as I see it your situation proves it wrong.
My best guess is that there is at least one old package that holds back
the update deeply nested inside the
Hi
It is best to remove the install-incorporation. It should have been
removed during the Installation Process but has not. And it is definetly
blocking your update.
pkg uninstall install-incorporation
Greetings
Till
On 2019-07-18 09:38, Andreas Wacknitz wrote:
> Am 18.07.19 um 09:25 schrieb
Am 18.07.19 um 09:25 schrieb Carl Brewer:
> On 18/07/2019 5:18 pm, Andreas Wacknitz wrote:
>> Am 18.07.19 um 08:50 schrieb Carl Brewer:
>>> On 18/07/2019 4:45 pm, Andreas Wacknitz wrote:
Am 18.07.19 um 08:12 schrieb Carl Brewer:
> On 18/07/2019 4:05 pm, Alexander Pyhalov via
On 18/07/2019 5:18 pm, Andreas Wacknitz wrote:
Am 18.07.19 um 08:50 schrieb Carl Brewer:
On 18/07/2019 4:45 pm, Andreas Wacknitz wrote:
Am 18.07.19 um 08:12 schrieb Carl Brewer:
On 18/07/2019 4:05 pm, Alexander Pyhalov via openindiana-discuss wrote:
pkg update -v
On 18/07/2019 4:45 pm, Andreas Wacknitz wrote:
Am 18.07.19 um 08:12 schrieb Carl Brewer:
On 18/07/2019 4:05 pm, Alexander Pyhalov via openindiana-discuss wrote:
pkg update -v userland-incorporation@latest osnet-incorporation@latest
Have you run exactly what Alexander proposed?
pkg refresh
Am 18.07.19 um 08:12 schrieb Carl Brewer:
> On 18/07/2019 4:05 pm, Alexander Pyhalov via openindiana-discuss wrote:
>> pkg update -v userland-incorporation@latest osnet-incorporation@latest
Have you run exactly what Alexander proposed?
pkg refresh
pkg update -v userland-incorporation@latest
On 18/07/2019 4:05 pm, Alexander Pyhalov via openindiana-discuss wrote:
pkg update -v userland-incorporation@latest osnet-incorporation@latest
I'm not familar with the syntax for this. As best I can tell, the
"current" userland-incorporation is :
root@dumper:~# pkg update
От: Carl Brewer
Отправлено: 18 июля 2019 г. 8:54
Кому: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Тема: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Virtualbox on OpenIndiana Hipster?
Right, this :
root@testy:~# pkg update --be-name oi20190718.2
Creating Plan (Running solver): |
pkg update
Right, this :
root@testy:~# pkg update --be-name oi20190718.2
Creating Plan (Running solver): |
pkg update: No solution was found to satisfy constraints
No solution found to update to latest available versions.
This may indicate an overly constrained set of packages are installed.
latest
On 18/07/2019 3:42 pm, Alexander Pyhalov via openindiana-discuss wrote:
Hi.
Such error just means that firstly you should update your system.
I have, at least, I have done the best I can to, without knowing what
I've done wrong in the mean time, this is the second update I've done
today, to
2019 г. 4:59
Кому: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Тема: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Virtualbox on OpenIndiana Hipster?
Not sure if this is related, I'm trying to spin up the OI build of
VirtualBox, seeing this :
root@testy:~# pkg install virtualbox
Creating Plan (Solver setup): -
pkg install
Not sure if this is related, I'm trying to spin up the OI build of
VirtualBox, seeing this :
root@testy:~# pkg install virtualbox
Creating Plan (Solver setup): -
pkg install: No matching version of system/virtualbox can be installed:
Reject:
: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Virtualbox on OpenIndiana Hipster?,...:
> How important are Spectre, Meltdown, etc for a system behind a firewall
> which does not allow inbound traffic and does not run programs
> downloaded from the internet?
Probably not important at all. What you're doing i
In regard to: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Virtualbox on OpenIndiana Hipster?,...:
How important are Spectre, Meltdown, etc for a system behind a firewall
which does not allow inbound traffic and does not run programs
downloaded from the internet?
Probably not important at all. What you're
How important are Spectre, Meltdown, etc for a system behind a firewall which
does not allow inbound traffic and does not run programs downloaded from the
internet?
My view for many years is that the browsers are so bad that all that is left is
the barn door. All the other walls are long
In regard to: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Virtualbox on OpenIndiana Hipster?,...:
I run 5.2.12 on 2017.10 without significant problems.
While what Reg is saying is true, there are some really important caveats
that people new to OI need to be aware of.
Versions of OI like Reg is talking about
Hi,
Vb 6.0.x is in hipster repos. With oracle extension, usb and shared folders
works just fine.
--
Espen Martinsen Email : e...@pogostick.net
dtrace -qn's*::ex*:ret*{printf("%d %s\n",uid,curpsinfo->pr_psargs);}'
Sendt fra min telefon
> 8.
I run 5.2.12 on 2017.10 without significant problems. USB and CDROM access is
unreliable, so I use images on disk. It's a bit of a nuisance, but it lets me
use the scanner in the Brother 3 in 1 without a lot of hassle and I can run
various fairly lightweight electronic design programs which
Hello All,
I thought that I may have recently saw some message on the OI mailing list
about VirtualBox but cannot locate that message.
With that in mind, I was wondering if VirtualBox works on OI Hipster?
Also, if it does then what about the functionality like CDROM and USB
access, as well a
Hi, Geoff,
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 19:33 -0700, Geoff Nordli wrote:
It would think vbox running on an illumos host would work pretty well
since I assume Oracle runs their VDI solution on Solaris. Do we think
there is going to be a lot of difference between Solaris and Illumos?
When last I
Thanks Bayard.
It would think vbox running on an illumos host would work pretty well
since I assume Oracle runs their VDI solution on Solaris. Do we think
there is going to be a lot of difference between Solaris and Illumos?
So what you are leaning towards is running Illumos as a guest is that
There are three problems running on VBox I've seen previously: 1) building
illumos-gate from source takes days instead of hours; 2) the debug kernel is
extremely unstable, frequently locking up and unable to recover; and 3)
scalability for vCPU and memory is flat on the reference host platform
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Geoff Nordli wrote:
I noticed some comments from Bayard on the list about how vbox was
completely unusable for development. Are there other people having success
using it on servers or have I just been lucky?
This is entirely an assumption on my part but I
On 03/19/2012 06:34 AM, Geoff Nordli wrote:
I have been using vbox 4.1.x on OI 151 for about 5 months now running
some server-based VMs with good success.
I noticed some comments from Bayard on the list about how vbox was
completely unusable for development.
Are there other people having
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Geoff Nordli geo...@gnaa.net wrote:
I have been using vbox 4.1.x on OI 151 for about 5 months now running
some server-based VMs with good success.
I noticed some comments from Bayard on the list about how vbox was
completely unusable for development.
I have been using vbox 4.1.x on OI 151 for about 5 months now running
some server-based VMs with good success.
I noticed some comments from Bayard on the list about how vbox was
completely unusable for development.
Are there other people having success using it on servers or have I
just been
44 matches
Mail list logo
