Syncing Jigsaw changes into FX 9-dev

We have integrated the FX Jigsaw changes into 9 (master) for this week's build. I will sync these changes down to FX 9-dev later today. What this means to you is this: * You will need JDK 9 build 109 (a pre-Jigsaw JDK 9 for boot JDK) and gradle 2.11 to continue building FX 9-dev. This is a tra

JDK 8u release renumbering: FX 8u-dev is now 8u102

The recently released JDK 8u77 release requires a renumbering for subsequent releases. Fixes going into openjfx 8u-dev are now targeted for 8u102. The fixVersion in JBS has been adjusted to reflect this. Please keep this in mind when pushing any approved fixes to 8u-dev. This is for the July

[9] review request: 8151865: JavaFX Gradle build script fails with Gradle 2.12

Hi Dave, Please review the following trivial change to build.gradle to allow building with gradle-2.12 (in addition to earlier versions). https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8151865 -- Kevin

Re: JavaFX Application Heat up MacBook Pro

Yes, 8u77 has the FX fix for this issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8132775 However, due to the way Apple chose to enable this, you will need to package your application with the appropriate entry in the Info.plist file. The equivalent AWT fix -- https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/b

[9] review request: 8152860: Enforce gradle 2.11 as minimum version

Please review this simple patch to enforce the fact that gradle 2.11 is now the minimum. https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8152860 -- Kevin

9-dev unlocked following sanity testing

[9] Review request: 8152993: All launcher tests fail to launch in non-jigsaw legacy mode

Please review this simple fix for system test failure: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8152993 -- Kevin

CFV: New OpenJFX Committer: Murali Billa

I hereby nominate Murali Billa [1] to OpenJFX Committer. Murali is a member of JavaFX team at Oracle working on WebKit, who has contributed 10 changesets [5] to OpenJFX, at least 8 of which are significant. Votes are due by April 14, 2016. Only current OpenJFX Committers [2] are eligible to

Re: CFV: New OpenJFX Committer: Murali Billa

Vote: YES Kevin Rushforth wrote: I hereby nominate Murali Billa [1] to OpenJFX Committer. Murali is a member of JavaFX team at Oracle working on WebKit, who has contributed 10 changesets [5] to OpenJFX, at least 8 of which are significant. Votes are due by April 14, 2016. Only current

9-dev unlocked following sanity testing

[9] Review request: 8153479: JavaFX unit tests fail after fix for JDK-8079136

Hi Vadim, Can you review this simple fix to our unit tests? https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153479 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8153479/webrev.00/ Thanks. -- Kevin

[9] Review request: 8153645: Mark TaskSwampEventQueueTest as unstable

Dave, Please review this simple change to mark TaskSwampEventQueueTest as unstable. Patch is in JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153645 -- Kevin

[9] Review request: 8153539: JavaFX build script checking order for jfxrt.jar is non-deterministic

Chien or Dave, Please review the following fix to the gradle dependencies: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153539 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8153539/webrev.00/ -- Kevin

[9] Review request: 8153754: Nashorn needs access to com.sun.javafx.application

Jim L, Please review the following simple change to add the needed qualified exports: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8153754/webrev.00/ -- Kevin

Re: RFR: JDK-8075550 - Error "JavaFX runtime not found" in nashorn when load predefines scripts to import JavaFX packages

There are no public types exported by javafx.deploy so the change to use that module seems unneeded (I see that you used to include the SWT classes, which is likely what you want, but for which we don't yet have a solution in JDK 9). Everything else looks good to me. +1 -- Kevin Jim Laskey

Re: status behind JDK-8149738

Without a native stack trace it will be hard to say whether this is the same bug or not. Several fixes for other crashes (not specifically JDK-8149738) have recently gone into 8-dev for 8u102. An early access build of 8u102-b01 with some of these fixes is available here: https://jdk8.java.ne

Re: status behind JDK-8149738

> is "writing address 0xbbadbeef". So they are not the same. Good catch, Vadim. This is likely an OOM or some other internal failure. That is the tell-tale sign of a call to the internal abort . The fact that this works with 64-bit and fails with 32-bit suggests an OOM problem. -- Kevin

9-dev unlocked following sanity testing

Re: Webkit: Conversion from string literal loses const qualifier

Hi Ali, The production build of FX is done using VS2013 and we haven't seen this error. Where are you getting FX from? Are you using VS2013 Express or Pro? If Express, be aware that we do not support 64-bit builds (although this is not likely your problem). -- Kevin Ali Ebrahimi wrote: Hi

[9] Review request: 8154203: Use StackWalker instead of the now-deprecated sun.reflect.Reflection class

Hi Vadim, Please review: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8154203 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8154203/webrev.00/ It's a straight-forward fix to replace Reflection::getCallerClass with StackWalker::getCallerClass and remove the (no longer needed) CallerSensitive annotation. -- Ke

Result: New OpenJFX Committer: Murali Billa

Voting for Murali Billa [1] to OpenJFX Committer [2] is now closed. Yes: 9 Veto: 0 Abstain: 0 According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is sufficient to approve the nomination. -- Kevin [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census#mbilla [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/ope

9-dev unlocked following sanity testing

[9] Review request: 8152355: IllegalAccessError: javafx.media cannot access jdk.internal.ref

Dave D or Alexander, Please review the following simple fix to add a qualified export for a class that is used by javafx.media that has moved as part of JEP-260. https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8152355 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8152355/webrev.00/ I verified that the IllegalAcce

[8u] review request: 8139326: [TEST] Unit tests for JFXPanel with security manager don't detect errors

Hi Chien, Can you do a quick sanity test review of the backport to 8u-dev of the following: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8139326 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8139326/webrev.00/ This was earlier reviewed (by you) for 9-dev with the intent to backport to 8u-dev, but the backport

[9] Review request: 8153872: Nashorn no longer needs access to com.sun.javafx.application

Jim, Please review the following fix: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153872 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8153872/webrev.00/ This is a simple backout of the earlier fix for JDK-8153754. -- Kevin

[8u] review request: 8139326: [TEST] Unit tests for JFXPanel with security manager don't detect errors

Hi Chien, Can you do a quick sanity test review of the backport to 8u-dev of the following: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8139326 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8139326/webrev.00/ This was earlier reviewed (by you) for 9-dev with the intent to backport to 8u-dev, but the backport

Changes for April 2016 CPU release (8u91/8u92) synced into FX 8u-dev and 9-dev

I have synced the OpenJFX changes from the just-released April 2016 CPU release (8u91/8u92) into 8u and into 9. Here is a webrev of the FX 8u92 changes for those who are interested in the changes, but don't want to wade through the 52 separate changesets I just pushed (most of which are tag or

Re: 8134600 Can't pass ObservableList as argument using FXML

> Fix is applicable for both 7 and 8. I presume you mean both *9* and 8? -- Kevin Andrey Rusakov wrote: Hello, Everyone! Here is my small fix for FXML, JDK-8134600. The reason was ProxyBuilder.getUserValue where check for Collection class

CFV: New OpenJFX Committer: Arunprasad Rajkumar

I hereby nominate Arunprasad Rajkumar [1] to OpenJFX Committer. Arunprasad is a member of JavaFX team at Oracle working on WebKit, who has contributed 10 changesets [5] to OpenJFX, at least 8 of which are significant. Votes are due by May 5, 2016. Only current OpenJFX Committers [2] are elig

Re: CFV: New OpenJFX Committer: Arunprasad Rajkumar

Vote: YES Kevin Rushforth wrote: I hereby nominate Arunprasad Rajkumar [1] to OpenJFX Committer. Arunprasad is a member of JavaFX team at Oracle working on WebKit, who has contributed 10 changesets [5] to OpenJFX, at least 8 of which are significant. Votes are due by May 5, 2016. Only

[9, 8u] review request: 8139317: [Mac] SecurityException when constructing WebView from JFXPanel application

Chien, Please review the following fix when running WebView in a JFXPanel on Mac with a security manager enabled: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8139317 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8139317/webrev.00/ -- Kevin

[9] review request: 8154564: Re-enable SandboxAppTest::testJFXPanelImplicitExitApp on Mac

Hi Chien, Please review this simple fix to re-enable the currently-failing test on Mac: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8154564 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8154564/webrev.00/ It is dependent on the previous fix for https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8139317 -- Kevin

9-dev unlocked following sanity testing

Re: [9] Review request: 8154186: JVM crash while using JavaFW WebView and colgroup/cols html feature

Yes, please open a new bug. -- Kevin David Hill wrote: On 4/27/16, 9:56 AM, Guru Hb wrote: Hi Dave & Kevin, Could you please review updated Unit test case http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ghb/8152420/webrev.01/ Solution updated in JBS. Hi Guru, JDK-8154186 is closed, so I suspect you wil

Re: [9] Review request: 8154186: JVM crash while using JavaFW WebView and colgroup/cols html feature

Oh I see the problem. This was just sent out with the wrong subject line. Please resend with the correct subject line for 8152420 and remove the quoted text for the other bug. Thanks. -- Kevin Kevin Rushforth wrote: Yes, please open a new bug. -- Kevin David Hill wrote: On 4/27/16, 9

CFV: New OpenJFX Committer: Guru Hb

I hereby nominate Guru Hb [1] to OpenJFX Committer. Guru is a member of JavaFX team at Oracle working on WebKit, who has contributed 10 changesets [5] to OpenJFX, at least 8 of which are significant. Votes are due by May 12, 2016. Only current OpenJFX Committers [2] are eligible to vote on t

Re: CFV: New OpenJFX Committer: Guru Hb

Vote: YES Kevin Rushforth wrote: I hereby nominate Guru Hb [1] to OpenJFX Committer. Guru is a member of JavaFX team at Oracle working on WebKit, who has contributed 10 changesets [5] to OpenJFX, at least 8 of which are significant. Votes are due by May 12, 2016. Only current OpenJFX

Re: javafx fonts in OpenSUSE

You can find instructions for filing a bug here: https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Submitting+a+Bug+Report The page for filing a bug is here: http://bugreport.java.com/bugreport/ -- Kevin Michal Hlavac wrote: Hi, Is it possible to file a bug for this issue? thanks, miso On ne

Re: SwingNode doesn't respond to Swing component resize?

Yes, this seems like a bug to me, too. Can you please file a bug? You can find instructions for filing a bug here: https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Submitting+a+Bug+Report The page for filing a bug is here: http://bugreport.java.com/bugreport/ -- Kevin Brian Bolstad wrote: Tha

Re: SwingNode doesn't respond to Swing component resize?

to the fix! Thanks, BB -Original Message- From: Kevin Rushforth [mailto:kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com] Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 1:13 PM To: Brian Bolstad Cc: Stijn Debruyckere; openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: SwingNode doesn't respond to Swing component resize? Yes,

9-dev unlocked following sanity testing

Re: Code Review Request For 8155757: Encapsulate impl_ methods in animation, canvas, image, input, layout, paint, and text packages

That sounds like a good idea. I like the idea of keeping the reduced scope (private where possible) for clarity if there isn't a noticeable performance penalty for doing so. Also, it matches our pattern for existing accessor methods, some of which directly access private property fields; changi

[9] review request: 8091308: Define fine-grained permissions for JavaFX

Jonathan and Chien, Please review the following, which adds fine-grained permissions to FX (following a similar pattern to that of AWT). https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8091308 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8091308/webrev.02/ http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8091308/docs.02/javafx/ut

Re: JFX - Running with Jigsaw in development

Thanks, Dave. This is a great step forward and is a necessary piece to enable us to eventually move to a later JDK 9 for building JavaFX (we are stuck at build 109 for now). -- Kevin David Hill wrote: We have a new trick in the FX repo to help with running FX apps backed by a Jigsaw enab

Result: New OpenJFX Committer: Arunprasad Rajkumar

Voting for Arunprasad Rajkumar [1] to OpenJFX Committer [2] is now closed. Yes: 7 Veto: 0 Abstain: 0 According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is sufficient to approve the nomination. -- Kevin [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census#arajkumar [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pip

Re: Request for backport of JDK-8144501

So this suggests that this is a regression introduced in 8u60 (which isn't reflected in the bug). If so, then that could be a justification for the backport. -- Kevin Robert Lichtenberger wrote: We are currently experience null pointer problems that have their root cause in https://bugs.open

9-dev unlocked following sanity testing

[9] review request: 8156591: IllegalAccessError in JFXPanel after fix for JDK-8080395

Phil or Semyon, Please review the following simple fix to comment out JFXPanel's use of the (now package-private) sun.awt.CausedFocusEvent class: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8156591 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8156591/webrev.00/ -- Kevin

HEADS-UP: plan to integrate a newer WebKit into 9-dev next week.

All, As a heads-up, we plan to push an updated WebKit to FX 9-dev early next week [1]. If there are no build problems, they will be integrated to 9 master the following week for jdk-9+119. We then plan to backport the newer WebKit (to keep them in sync) to 8u-dev a couple weeks later. The on

Re: HEADS-UP: plan to integrate a newer WebKit into 9-dev next week.

JavaScript 3D libraries for "free". And, Google Maps will finally work too. On 11 May 2016, at 08:20, Kevin Rushforth wrote: All, As a heads-up, we plan to push an updated WebKit to FX 9-dev early next week [1]. If there are no build problems, they will be integrated to 9 master the foll

Re: HEADS-UP: plan to integrate a newer WebKit into 9-dev next week.

been implemented at the very least since JFX 8. On 12 May 2016, at 01:11, Kevin Rushforth wrote: No. WebGL support is not planned for JDK 9. We will look at this for JDK 10. -- Kevin Felix Bembrick wrote: Will this new WebKit finally support WebGL? Just by supporting WebGL in the

[9] review request: 8156809: Remove obsolete com.sun.javafx.robot package

Hi Chien, Please review the following. https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8156809 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8156809/webrev.00/ This is a simple fix to cleanup some dead code that was discovered as part of the review of the encapsulation work you are doing. -- Kevin

New OpenJFX Committer: Guru Hb

Voting for Guru Hb [1] to OpenJFX Committer [2] is now closed. Yes: 9 Veto: 0 Abstain: 0 According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is sufficient to approve the nomination. -- Kevin [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census#ghb [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-de

Re: Removal of com.sun.javafx.robot

I didn't realize that anyone was using the old FXRobot. I don't remember this showing up on Jonathan's list of internal APIs that apps were using, but I may have missed it. I see two choices: 1) revert the change as you suggested...the cost of keeping this code around isn't all that heavy; 2)

Re: Removal of com.sun.javafx.robot

Ah, that's good. -- Kevin Benjamin Gudehus wrote: **Update:** I've found a work-around and quickly tested it on our test suite. Previously we needed `FXRobot::keyPress()`, `FXRobot::keyType()`, and `FXRobot::keyRelease()`. Since Java 8 it is possible to use `Event.fireEvent()` and create three

[9] review request: 8157060: [Linux] sandboxed applications fail with AccessControlException

Jim, Chien, or Dave, Please review: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8157060 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8157060/webrev.00/ Simple fix to use existing pattern to read system properties. -- Kevin

9-dev unlocked following sanity testing

Re: JDK9 build 119 fails on Ubuntu Gnome 16.04

Jim can comment further, but this might be related to the recent Hi-DPI support for Linux that went into build 119. Btw, the updated WebKit will be in build 120. -- Kevin Thomas Kruse wrote: Hi, I tested the latest build 119 of JDK9. I was curious to try out the WebKit update, but even a ve

Re: [9] Code Review Request For 8157350: Encapsulate impl_ methods in Shapes related classes

This is needed for those cases where we need to encapsulate a method in the base Shape class that used to be public and overridden in the subclasses, not all of which are in the same package. It may seem like overkill, but we need a way to associate the the Shape instance of a particular subtyp

Re: [9] Code Review Request For 8157350: Encapsulate impl_ methods in Shapes related classes

Jim Graham wrote: On 5/20/16 3:33 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote: This is needed for those cases where we need to encapsulate a method in the base Shape class that used to be public and overridden in the subclasses, not all of which are in the same package. It may seem like overkill, but we

[9] Review request:

Hi Chien, Please review the following to deprecate the HostServices.getWebContext() method in JDK 9: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8156963 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8156963/webrev.00/ This is being done as part of JEP 289 [1][2]. Thanks. -- Kevin [1] https://bugs.openjdk.j

[9] Review request: 8156963: Add @Deprecated annotation to HostServices.getWebContext method

[resend with correct subject line] Hi Chien, Please review the following to deprecate the HostServices.getWebContext() method in JDK 9: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8156963 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8156963/webrev.00/ This is being done as part of JEP 289 [1][2]. Thanks.

9-dev unlocked following sanity testing

Re: OSX+Radeon crash VideoDataBuffer.convert YCbCr_422 -> BGRA_PRE

I'm not surprised this causes problems, as it is almost certainly not thread-safe. FWIW, this impl_ method is already inaccessible in JDK 9 because it returns a type that is not exported from the javafx.media module. Further, this methods will go away very soon as part of the ongoing encapsul

[9] review request: 8131888: Deliver javafx.swt as a modular jar in JDK 9

Please review the following: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8131888 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8131888/webrev.00/ This adds support for the javafx.embed.swt package back into the JDK, which will be delivered as an automatic module in $JAVA_HOME/lib/javafx-swt.jar (final location

Re: [9] review request: 8131888: Deliver javafx.swt as a modular jar in JDK 9

Mandy, Thanks for your feedback. Comments inline. Mandy Chung wrote: On May 25, 2016, at 3:38 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote: Please review the following: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8131888 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8131888/webrev.00/ This adds support for the

Re: [9] review request: 8131888: Deliver javafx.swt as a modular jar in JDK 9

(which the 99%) use case for SWT useage. The SWT jar is not on the application classpath so how should a module (named or unnamed) find the SWT classes? Tom Von meinem iPhone gesendet Am 26.05.2016 um 02:43 schrieb Mandy Chung : On May 25, 2016, at 3:38 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote

Re: [9] review request: 8131888: Deliver javafx.swt as a modular jar in JDK 9

Von meinem iPhone gesendet Am 26.05.2016 um 02:43 schrieb Mandy Chung : On May 25, 2016, at 3:38 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote: Please review the following: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8131888 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8131888/webrev.00/ This adds support fo

Re: [9] review request: 8131888: Deliver javafx.swt as a modular jar in JDK 9

Alan Bateman wrote: On 26/05/2016 16:38, Kevin Rushforth wrote: Yes, I've tested it in both modes (with a simple HelloFXCanvas program) -- as an automatic jar file and as just an ordinary jar on the classpath. Just curious, if there are qualified exports to javafx.swt then how it does

Re: HEADS-UP: plan to integrate a newer WebKit into 9-dev next week.

rote: Any comments on this? Isn't it time to move to Blink? On 13 May 2016, at 04:32, Felix Bembrick wrote: Thanks Kevin. I was more curious as to why WebGL support hasn't been there since day 1, given that WebKit itself supports it. Felix On 13 May 2016, at 01:52, Kevin R

Re: [9] review request: 8131888: Deliver javafx.swt as a modular jar in JDK 9

Thanks for confirming. So it sounds like we have a workable plan. -- Kevin Alan Bateman wrote: On 27/05/2016 13:47, Kevin Rushforth wrote: The qualified exports are done using reflection to the calling module that contains the javafx.embed.swt.FXCanvas class, irrespective of the name of

Re: HEADS-UP: plan to integrate a newer WebKit into 9-dev next week.

s has? Is there some technical or architectural barrier? On 27 May 2016, at 22:51, Kevin Rushforth wrote: No, I don't have anything further to add about WebGL, if that's what you are asking. As for moving to Blink, that would be a very large effort. We do not currently plan to

Re: JavaFX with Eclipse and JDK9

Where did you download it from? What build is it (i.e., what is the output of "java -version")? Can you run "java -listmods" and see whether the javafx.* modules are there? -- Kevin Dr. Michael Paus wrote: I recently tried to get a JavaFX application running with the latest EA build of JDK9

Re: HEADS-UP: plan to integrate a newer WebKit into 9-dev next week.

/versions/16302 is quite time-consuming. With best regards, Konstantin 2016-05-27 14:51 GMT+02:00 Kevin Rushforth <mailto:kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>>: No, I don't have anything further to add about WebGL, if that's what you are asking. As for moving to Blink,

Re: In(Sanity) Testing Mondays

Please note that Monday is a US holiday, so the testing will be a bit lighter than usual. As I won't be around to send the "unlock" message, consider it unlocked at 1pm Pacific on Monday. Thanks. -- Kevin Vadim Pakhnushev wrote: Reminder, Monday is our weekly sanity testing. You can find y

9-dev unlocked following sanity testing

Anyone using JMX with JavaFX?

As some of you may be aware, JavaFX has shipped a JMX plugin as a separate jar file along with the JDK (not part of the JRE) in /lib/javafx-mx.jar. Development on this plugin stopped prior to JDK 8 being shipped, although we continued to ship javafx-mx.jar in JDK 8. Are there any developers th

Re: Full speed animation - shouldn't the default value be true?

The full-speed property is an undocumented system property and therefore not a formal feature of JavaFX. It is provided solely as a testing mechanism to allow measurement of raw rendering / animation performance for simple(r) scenes. There is no point in rendering faster than the 60 Hz refresh

Re: Anyone using JMX with JavaFX?

&type=Code&ref=searchresults showing 0 results. cheers, dalibor topic On 09.06.2016 00:31, Kevin Rushforth wrote: As some of you may be aware, JavaFX has shipped a JMX plugin as a separate jar file along with the JDK (not part of the JRE) in /lib/javafx-mx.jar. Development on this p

Re: Looking forward to JavaFX 9!

JavaFX is delivered as part of the JDK, so yes, Oracle does support it. -- Kevin Kevin Loverde wrote: Does Oracle support JFX at all anymore? The only place I could find the stage builder was through Gluon.

Re: JavaFX 9 & FXCanvas

Hi, As far as we know, FXCanvas is now usable in an OSGi context with JDK 9 + Jigsaw, so you should be able to test this with the latest JDK 9 early access build. You mentioned that the following bugs are critical for you: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8159227 (properly forward c

[9] review request: 8159474: Unable to change URL with HelloWebView

Guru & Chien, Please review the following fix to the HelloWebView toy: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8159474 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8159474/webrev.00/ -- Kevin

Re: JavaFX 9 & FXCanvas

P1) should be your target. -- Kevin Alexander Nyßen wrote: Hi Kevin, Am 14.06.2016 um 23:00 schrieb Kevin Rushforth mailto:kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>>: Hi, As far as we know, FXCanvas is now usable in an OSGi context with JDK 9 + Jigsaw, so you should be able to test this with

Re: PING: JDK-8146900: [SwingNode, DND]: drag-and-drop from JTable not working, drag recognized twice

I missed seeing this when you first posted it. I will add your comments to the bug report. Alexander Z may want to chime in since the bug is assigned to him and he is the component lead for SwingNode. -- Kevin Yasumasa Suenaga wrote: PING: Have you ever read this proposal? Yasumasa On 2016

Re: LocalDateTimeStringConverterTest seem to fail if default locale is different to en_US

It seems like the test is not written to handle multiple Locales, so if you could file a bug, we'll fix it (I note that it could probably be in a "BeforeClass" block as one-time setup rather than setting it before each test). As for your other test failures, I presume you are using FX 9-dev? A

Re: Building OpenJFX for the first time

https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Building+OpenJFX Dave Hill updated it recently, so it is reasonably current. -- Kevin John C. Turnbull wrote: I would like to set up a development environment for the OpenJFX project but have never attempted this before. I am very familiar wi

Re: LocalDateTimeStringConverterTest seem to fail if default locale is different to en_US

r boot JDK. You can either download the latest JDK 9 EA build and copy libjfxwebkit.dylib from there, or you can build webkit: gradle -PCOMPILE_WEBKIT=true -- Kevin Alexander Nyssen wrote: Hi Kevin, Am 17.06.2016 um 17:44 schrieb Kevin Rushforth mailto:kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>>: I

9-dev unlocked following sanity testing

Re: Bootstrapping in Java9

As Thomas notes, this is independent of JDK 9 or Jigsaw. We have a couple similar RFEs filed: JDK-8092262 : Add Application.launch(ApplicationFactory,String... args) JDK-8091703 : Support for De

Re: [PATCH] 8088147: FXCanvas: implement custom cursors

Hi Alexander, It looks like your patch was stripped out by the mailing list server. Can you please send me the patch offline, as a zip file (so line endings are preserved across different systems), and I will unzip it and attach it to the bug report. -- Kevin Alexander Nyssen wrote: Hi,

Re: OpenJFX Project Lead Resignation

Hi Richard, I would like to publicly thank you for your outstanding leadership of the OpenJFX Project over the years! I know that your heart is still with JavaFX even if it can no longer occupy more than a small percentage of your time to follow the mailing list. Your insights will always be

OpenJFX 8u-dev and 9-dev repos will be locked on Friday for maintenance

The following OpenJFX repos will be locked tomorrow (Friday) for some maintenance: 9-dev/rt 9-dev/tests 8u-dev/rt 8u-dev/tests Please consider them as read-only mode during the lockout period. Start time: 07:00 Pacific, Friday, 2016-06-24 End time: ETA is 13:00 Pacific, but I will send an ex

8u-dev and 9-dev repos are unlocked [was: OpenJFX 8u-dev and 9-dev repos will be locked on Friday for maintenance]

The repo maintenance is done and the 8u-dev and 9-dev repos are unlocked. -- Kevin Kevin Rushforth wrote: The following OpenJFX repos will be locked tomorrow (Friday) for some maintenance: 9-dev/rt 9-dev/tests 8u-dev/rt 8u-dev/tests Please consider them as read-only mode during the lockout

In(Sanity) Testing Mondays

Reminder, Monday is our weekly sanity testing. You can find your testing assignment at: https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Sanity+Testing Also please remember that the repo will be locked from 1am PST until 1pm PST. Happy testing! Thanks. -- Kevin

Re: ClassNotFoundException at HostServicesDelegate

Hi Yasumasa, I assume this is a download of the Oracle JDK from java.net? We haven't seen any problems like this, so it might be a problem with HeapStats analyzer. The class in question is a closed-source class that lives in the javafx.deploy module. What exactly are you running? -- Kevin

Re: Exception on render thread: "NGTriangleMesh: buildGeometry failed"

This suggests that you are running out of native memory. You might consider using a 64-bit JVM. -- Kevin GUEVEL, Emanuel wrote: Hello, I am using JavaFX 8 for a 3D visualization application. I display a set of TriangleMesh and under some circumstances, an exception is thrown on the JavaFX r

Re: ClassNotFoundException at HostServicesDelegate

K 8. So I guess this exception is from Java FX 9. Thanks, Yasumasa 2016/06/28 23:52 "Kevin Rushforth" <mailto:kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>>: Hi Yasumasa, I assume this is a download of the Oracle JDK from java.net <http://java.net>? We haven't seen any pro

Re: ClassNotFoundException at HostServicesDelegate

A workaround is: java -addmods javafx.deploy We will need a fix that doesn't require this. -- Kevin Kevin Rushforth wrote: Thanks for the pointer. That was enough for me to reproduce the bug. I filed the following issue to track it: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-81

Re: Exception on render thread: "NGTriangleMesh: buildGeometry failed"

Glad to hear it. -- Kevin GUEVEL, Emanuel wrote: It worked. The problem is not present anymore after switching to a 64-bit JVM. Many thanks for this. :) Best regards, Emanuel -Message d'origine- De : Kevin Rushforth [mailto:kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com] Envoyé : mardi 28 juin

Re: Exception on render thread: "NGTriangleMesh: buildGeometry failed"

Yes, so we might want to file a bug (we have several places in native where we should do a better job about handling native OOM). -- Kevin Jim Graham wrote: Would a better exception help? OOME? ...jim On 6/28/16 9:18 AM, Kevin Rushforth wrote: Glad to hear it. -- Kevin

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >