developers think a Javafx jdk8 building platform should
do the same.
Thanks in advance
Mike Tallent
CEO
Objectwheel
Not
Objectwheel
But we own
fxrad.com
Lol
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 6, 2014, at 9:20 AM, Christian Schudt christian.sch...@gmx.de wrote:
Hehe, funny how every project is called *FX. Still waiting for the
YetAnotherProjectFX :-)
Let's see, what I could find by a quick research:
Follow this thread and open javafx
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 6, 2014, at 1:49 AM, Kirill Kirichenko kirill.kiriche...@oracle.com
wrote:
I couldn't find media part in Jira.
On 06.03.2014 00:44, Stephen F Northover wrote:
... of course I mean the media component, not base. I just
resolution tool (I think).
jeff
On Apr 1, 2014, at 12:49 PM, Mike Hearn m...@plan99.net wrote:
How do I do that? And won't that make everything blurry? Retina support is
one reason why I chose JFX. Swing on Retina Macs is pretty much unusable,
it's like looking through thick plastic
Don't expect anything from Oracle related to IOS and Android other than
some code contributions. They have said
ADF Mobile / Jdeveloper (etc) will suffer financially if Oracle supports
IOS and Android directly.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Pedro Duque Vieira
pedro.duquevie...@gmail.com
I would rather see an android and ios project cross platform that's compelling
enough by oracle with a fancy scene builder based impressive GUI and datafx
mongodb backend
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 10, 2014, at 8:35 AM, Jeff Martin j...@reportmill.com wrote:
I wish Oracle would try to
Sorry to barge in here but we think developers should know
http://youtu.be/qK0WdWVAab0 http://t.co/SuQZZKKeAo
We are excited
Beta Testing soon.
Sigh ups for Javafx android beta
https://abigdreamer.wufoo.com/forms/objectwheel-android-javafx-beta-signup/
Sent from my iPhone
thats funny -Scene! boy I can't spell
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Mike mikeg...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually Felix Everybody is waiting for you to write such a tool. I don't
think anybody has scene your Disney Animation Movie Credits but me.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Felix Bembrick
Why is Oracle ignoring questions about embedded? .. We put our Careers and
Lifes behind products like #Javafx
https://twitter.com/hashtag/Javafx?src=hash -- I think we deserve an
answer!
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:21 AM, oma...@free.fr wrote:
yes, why ???
- Mail original -
De:
Sorry -- can you clarify?
What embedded platforms are supported by Jdk9? Where do I get a list?
What is the most common Embedded device in low cost Mass production?
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Florian Brunner fbrunnerl...@gmx.ch
wrote:
Indeed, this is really bad news then. :-(
JavaFX
What is your Favorite Embedded board if you got something right now? Odroid
U3? or something else. I guess
the Odroid U3 is availabe in Early Feb again at 179.00 US.
http://www.hardkernel.com/main/products/prdt_info.php?g_code=G140448267127
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Jasper Potts
Thanks so much guys!
Last Question is Which boards from BoundaryDevices have you tried with
Javafx? I see they have a new board too.
This is very helpful information and will save us a lot of time. We are
after Top Graphics Performance in Embedded.
Mike
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:03 PM, David
OH sorry David, I think you answered this already -- reading above.
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:03 PM, David Hill david.h...@oracle.com wrote:
On 1/28/15, 3:44 PM, Mike wrote:
What is your Favorite Embedded board if you got something right now?
Odroid U3? or something else. I guess
Does this support webrtc?
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 26, 2015, at 8:21 PM, Kevin Rushforth kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com
wrote:
All,
The newer WebKit + compiler upgrade has been pushed to 8u-dev and we have
done a successful test build on all platforms. Please let me know if you
Does Intel Edison run jdk8 u40?
The Intel® Edison is an ultra small computing platform that will change the way
you look at embedded electronics. Each Edison is packed with a huge amount of
tech goodies into a tiny package while still providing the same robust strength
of your go-to single
I did not mean to include anything from Intel
My own research appears to indicate jdk8 will run edison
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 27, 2015, at 2:52 PM, Kevin Rushforth kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com
wrote:
Mike wrote:
Does Intel Edison run jdk8 u40?
[off topic advertisement
This has caused us a lot of sleepless days
Blur issue and fonts
Cross platform scaling
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 16, 2015, at 3:24 PM, Matthieu BROUILLARD matth...@brouillard.fr
wrote:
In my company at least in the business (healthcare in hospitals) we target
JavaFX for (as a
This is important
Thanks guys
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 8, 2015, at 9:25 AM, Chris Newland cnewl...@chrisnewland.com wrote:
Hi Jim,
I'll post the verbose prism output from my iMac when I get home.
Just tried this on my Linux workstation and the performance gap is the
same between
Felix how many full time Engineers does Oracle have on Javafx and Java? How
does this break up? How many open source contributors are Committing often?
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks Kevin but I am left a little underwhelmed by this tiny
pisze:
JavaFX accessibility is already implemented and was delivered
in JDK 8u40.
-- Kevin
Michał Zegan wrote: What about accessibility work? Work on it
has been started, but not sure if it is still targetted for
9.
W dniu 2015-06-27 o 20:16, Mike pisze:
a lot of FULL
I thought you knew. Your spending a lot of time researching information
about your upcoming blog post so I thought that was part of your common
knowledge.
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Why are you asking me?
On 28 June 2015 at 05:24, Mike
This is awesome news! Congrats
Sent from Objectwheel Mike
On Aug 6, 2015, at 1:11 PM, Tai Hu tai...@veroanalytics.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am preparing our product (built in JavaFX 8) for submission to Apple
Mac Store. All code signing and self-contained installer generation are done
Hi there,
On a MacBook Pro with OS X 10.9.2, does anyone have any estimates for
anticipated frame rates of a full-screen animated blur? I noticed that when
my window is not maximized, the blur is smooth and high frame-rate. When
maximized the blur is somewhat choppy. Unfortunately I have no clue
things snappy again.
This is a bit disconcerting. Does anyone else see such appalling
performance impact from the blurred circles demo on their Mac? Is this a
driver issue, perhaps? Are there any platforms where this demo hits a good
fps?
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Mike Hearn m...@plan99.net
might try it with and without retina
level resolution. I haven't tested JavaFX 8 with retina, but JFX 7 had
serious problems that would go away when I changed the display to
non-retina.
jeff
On Apr 1, 2014, at 11:41 AM, Mike Hearn m...@plan99.net wrote:
Actually, playing some more
] On Behalf
Of Jeff Martin
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 11:17 AM
To: Mike Hearn
Cc: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: Expected frame rates for a full-screen blur
I assume retina optimization was added for JFX 8 (or is on the short
list). I think there is a Jira for it.
You can
How does the OS tank?
All the OS animations hit the same frame rate as the app itself does. For
instance, opening Mission Control is normally smooth, but when a maximized
JFX app is animating, it's not.
It feels like the GPU is being overworked but as I'm not a GPU expert at
all, I'm not sure
the issue must
be something to do with how fast the GPU drains the command queue or
something.
BTW I tried doing -Dprism.order=j2d to see what would happen, and the GUI
hangs before rendering anything. I'll file a bug on that later.
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Mike Hearn m...@plan99.net wrote
What version of jdk and Swing did you use? Can you check it on the
latest jdk8?
Ah you're right, Swing does hidpi these days. When I made the decision to
start using JFX it didn't. But last time I tried the IntelliJ Oracle JVM
builds the UI was pretty messed up so it seemed to still have
I'm trying (mostly in vain) to optimise the startup time of my app. It
takes about a second to build the main GUI via FXMLLoader.load() - probably
because the GUI is getting a little bit complex but I think mostly because
it's all running interpreted, as it's one of the first things the app does.
At e(fx)clipse we have an FXML to Java translator who removes all the
reflection overhead from FXML. It does not yet support all FXML features
but we are steadily improving it and with test cases we are able to fix
problems quite fast. Maybe this is an option for you?
That would be very
, April 26, 2014 11:39 AM, Mike Hearn m...@plan99.net
wrote:
At e(fx)clipse we have an FXML to Java translator who removes all the
reflection overhead from FXML. It does not yet support all FXML
features
but we are steadily improving it and with test cases we are able to fix
problems quite fast
It's probably easiest to have a tiny Java app that just loads the JS files
from resources in the JAR and runs it via Nashorn directly. Then all
existing tools like jfxpackager, JWrapper etc can treat it like a Java app.
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 3:30 AM, Bilal Soidik bilalsoi...@gmail.com wrote:
Very nice, thanks!
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Simon Vienot simon.vie...@oracle.comwrote:
In case some of you missed it, we have just pushed Scene Builder 2.0 live
[1] yesterday.
All details on Jasper's nice blog post [2].
If you have 8 minutes to spare, I encourage you to have a look
Awesome! I'll check it out.
I'm not sure how your versioning scheme works. Does 8u20 mean it will be
released 20 weeks after the original Java 8.0 or something? When is it
expected to go stable?
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Joe McGlynn joe.mcgl...@oracle.comwrote:
Hi Mike,
Take a look
I'd like to create my main stage, show some splash widgets, then begin the
slower process of hauling the data and rest of the main UI into memory.
Unfortunately when I do this most of the startup time has the stage being
empty, instead of showing the splash. Introducing some artificial delays
As long as you are doing any of the heavy lifting on the FX application
thread it will necessarily starve the rendering, since the application
thread is where animation is run and rendering is triggered. Applications
are encouraged to do computationally expensive tasks or tasks that are
Would that runLater() code always run after the splash image was finished
being rendered?
Unfortunately I tried this and it doesn't work.
JavaFX has a dual threaded architecture in which all app logic and scene
graph handling happens on the app thread, and the process of drawing a
frame
Does the new bundler still create DMGs as well?
AppName-version-MAS.pkg where the -MAS variant is for Mac App Store,
this will show up in next weeks build.
Could I suggest -AppStore instead of -MAS, which is a rather opaque
acronym.
There are no reasons that JavaFX could not work well on mobile platforms,
providing there is a JVM. I was convinced that mobile UI toolkits were very
specific, but it's really not the case. Android UI Toolkit has really very
few mobile specificities for example.
It's not so much the
I have what I imagine is a fairly typical JavaFX application (once it's
released I'll post more about it). It has a GUI, some mostly asynchronous
state management, and interactions with various servers that can change the
apps state.
At first I tried the simple and obvious approach in which the
Thanks Tomas! I'm a big fan of your work and blog.
I learned about ReactFX after I started writing my current project, seems
like a very useful abstraction indeed, although so far I've found the basic
JFX stuff to be nearly sufficient (a few more transformers and mirrored
observables were so far
I'd like to change my animations depending on whether the users GPU can
keep up. For now, I'm OK with some manual string matching on adapter IDs. I
see no way in JavaFX to find out what hardware I'm on. Is there a
different/other way to get this data, via some other Java API?
Would it be feasible for you to do some measurements / calibration on the
system and make the determination based on measured speed? That seems more
to the point anyway.
I don't know how to do that without actually drawing to the screen, which I
don't want to do.
Scott is correct about the determining of the SW pipeline. To add to that,
if knowing whether you are running on SW is sufficient
Unfortunately for the Intel HD4000 card that some older laptops have, it
technically supports 3D but struggles to do basic shader effects at 60fps
when running at
that with a number of embedded GPUs...
...jim
On 8/1/14 2:27 AM, Mike Hearn wrote:
Scott is correct about the determining of the SW pipeline. To add to
that,
if knowing whether you are running on SW is sufficient
Unfortunately for the Intel HD4000 card that some older
shouldn't use the word bad
card. What I'm saying is that you will have to add it to your blacklist if
you don't want JavaFX to use it for rendering due to poor framerate.
- Chien
On 8/6/2014 9:57 AM, Mike Hearn wrote:
The card isn't bad per se, it's just the HD4000 integrated graphics chip
Thanks for the tip. Bug filed:
https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-38224
Hi Tony,
Please be aware that your messages to this list are getting spamfoldered by
Gmail and likely other providers too. Not much you can do about it other
than ask the OpenJDK list admins to fix their list so it doesn't break DKIM
body hashes. Yahoo has a strict policy and many mailing lists
I enjoy iterating on my UI using JFX CSS and a simple hot reload feature I
added to my app, but I still have to drop back into writing code for doing
animations. In practice this means I use fewer nice animations than I
otherwise would, as perfecting them takes longer.
CSS3 has a way to denote
I see this message quite frequently. What sort of things do you need in
these bug reports?
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Kevin Rushforth kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com
wrote:
Any time you see this message, it isn't your fault. Rather this is a bug
in the JavaFX runtime. Please file a JIRA.
--
to
demonstrate the bug. I know this can be a challenge for an intermittent bug.
-- Kevin
Mike Hearn wrote:
I see this message quite frequently. What sort of things do you need in
these bug reports?
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Kevin Rushforth
kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com wrote:
Any time
If I load image bits into an Image how is the decoding done? Is this using
native code and if so there is a way to swap out the decoding engines for
ones written in Java? I see native image libraries in my JRE lib directory
so I suspect the answer is, they're decoded in C.
I ask because I'm
I've not encountered one, but building such a thing should be quite
straightforward. You could use CSS to create a text-area like rectangle
with an HBox inside it, and then have a no-border textedit that simply
expands to fill the available space. When the user presses enter you create
an
good fit for
the Bitcoin community, because we suffer quite badly from the limitations
and problems of web apps. HTML5 + decentralisation don't mix very well. A
plain old desktop app works better, and JavaFX is a good way to build such
things.
thanks,
-mike
Observable data structures are a useful and general abstraction, which
JavaFX deploys to great effect. Combined with the mirroring techniques I
posted about a few months ago I found them to be a good way of combining
background work and network-updated state with GUI apps.
For this reason, they'd
2) A control, such as a ProgressIndicator, that uses animation to display
changes (even if the control is scrolled off the screen)
One common control animation that is easily overlooked is a text cursor,
which is animated to blink - when the control has focus.
That would only cause one
Well, this was a pain in the ass. The cause is indeed
ProgressBar/ProgressIndicator. It turns out that they can leak animations
even when removed from the scene graph or their parents are made invisible.
I filed:
https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-38894
I now have a bunch of hacks to set
So you are using opacityProperty() and not visibleProperty(), so my
exact workaround would not work anyway.
I did originally put some code into animatedBind to set visible == false
when opacity == 0.0 and vice versa, but it didn't seem to solve the
animation leak so I took it out again.
BTW
I've noticed this with some icons, double check that the font file
you're using in FontAwesomeFX does actually contain the icon,
FontAwesome seems to add new icons even in minor releases.
It's the same JAR on all three platforms, and Windows is the only one it
fails on. I don't think it can
Someone got in touch with me today and pointed out a bug in this code, but
it was already fixed by me some time ago. I've refreshed the gist with the
latest versions of these classes, but the upstream project is now fully
open source. You can get the latest code here:
JavaFX provides a great set of widgets that are pretty complete, but a few
lag behind behind their native counterparts on some platforms. This is
especially noticeable with the Mac text field widget, which has things like
integrated spelling/grammar checking, auto correct, services, speech
Mike,
Embedding native controls in FX runs afoul of the whole
lightweight/heavyweight issue. I had a hack of this once using SWT native
controls and I was able to have them appear on Windows because HWND
clipping was honored but on Mac, FX drew on top of the native control. Mac
was changed
already have some existing platform, alternative or replacement
for an that platform comes to mind).
Apparently it is not animations, personally I'm still hoping 3rd party
controls support in SceneBuilder will get higher on the list, but I'm not
getting my hopes up. But as Mike pointed out
What happens to existing jfx apps once 10.10.2 starts rolling out? Do they
all break?! I didn't see much discussion of the scope of this issue in the
bug report.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Morris Meyer morris.me...@oracle.com
wrote:
Kevin and David,
Please review this patch for the issue
I have a ScrollPane into which I put a Pane with a min width/height, and
then I place a Button and a Sphere. For both of them I use setLayoutX/Y to
move them around.
Now when I scroll the ScrollPane I can see it move the button around
correctly, and the sphere, but the sphere is able to draw over
Finally, it would be nice to get information about the actual screen DPI.
In my tests Screen.getDpi always returns 96, regardless of what it actually
is...
You can reflectively access Screen.getPixelScale() to learn if you're on
Retina. Of course, don't expect to swap out the JRE for a newer
javapackager makes debs that install things into /opt, which means they
aren't on the path. Is there a reason for this choice rather than making
FHS-compliant packages that install into /usr?
thanks!
What is Application.getApplication() here? The JavaFX Application class
does not have a setOpenFileHandler method. Is that a Mac-specific API?
It's too bad that 8u40 won't have this. Being able to easily open double
clicked files is pretty basic. Perhaps post 8u40 the JFX team could go
through
://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u40/jdk/file/564bca490631/src/macosx/classes/com/apple/eawt
On Jan 5, 2015, at 10:43 AM, Mike Hearn m...@plan99.net wrote:
What is Application.getApplication() here? The JavaFX Application class
does not have a setOpenFileHandler method. Is that a Mac-specific API
application too, just tried it locally.
You may be thinking of an older iteration of the apple application
listener classes or perhaps the native level of the code.
On Jan 5, 2015, at 11:04 AM, Mike Hearn m...@plan99.net wrote:
Scene Builder doesn't do it this way - AFAICT you're only
The changeset patch is 185 Mbytes and touches 11,688 files including
added, removed, modifiled files. I tried generating a webrev, but it is
just too big and unweildy to upload (over 1.6 GBytes).
A 185 megabyte patch!? That is .. mind boggling. I don't envy you guys!
Couple of
The bug is restricted - intentional?
I'm guessing this is class data sharing and would make startup of packaged
apps faster?
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:52 AM, Chris Bensen chris.ben...@oracle.com
wrote:
+1
On Mar 30, 2015, at 3:11 PM, Danno Ferrin danno.fer...@oracle.com wrote:
Kevin,
, Mar 31, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Chris Bensen chris.ben...@oracle.com
wrote:
Correct!
On Mar 31, 2015, at 4:41 AM, Mike Hearn m...@plan99.net wrote:
The bug is restricted - intentional?
I'm guessing this is class data sharing and would make startup of packaged
apps faster?
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015
One of the major pain points I see is that the java-packager does not
support to set a splash-screen
Does your app really need one? My laptop can throw a Stage onto the screen
in about 500msec. Then you can just show your own splash whilst the app
loads ...
Hi Kevin,
Scene Builder source code is available in the OpenJFX repo under the BSD
license, but separate binaries are no longer being released as of 8u40.
I'm a bit confused what this means.
People who want to use Scene Builder are expected to compile it themselves
from now on? Does that
on the latest 8u40 source code in OpenJFX. It
includes the 8u40 Controls (e.g. Spinner, Dialogs).
Hope this is helpful.
- Johan
2015-03-04 16:31 GMT+01:00 Mike Hearn m...@plan99.net:
Hi Kevin,
Scene Builder source code is available in the OpenJFX repo under the BSD
license, but separate
Hey Jonathan,
If you let us know who does make these decisions, we will happily repeat
our questions to them :) Mark Reinhold perhaps?
I mean, I appreciate that GUI libraries are probably not a prime driver of
sales for Oracle, but as an enterprise focused company I assume management
understands
2349 Unresolved Bugs seems buggy to me:
https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/issues/?jql=issuetype%20%3D%20Bug%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved
Any software project always has lots of unresolved issues in the issue
tracker, though, especially something as large as a UI toolkit. Qt has
about
This is what we did at Gluon (http://gluonhq.com), and the result can be
downloaded at http://gluonhq.com/products/downloads/
Thanks Johan! Looks like Gluon is the Trolltech equivalent I just wished
for - that was fast :-)
From your blog post, it sounds like you're planning to fork SB or at
I see, thanks for the background Anton. I haven't used WebView in my own
app (partly because it's security sensitive) so didn't realise how
integrated the control is! That's indeed a very impressive level of
integration.
It's possible I'm over-thinking this. Disabling JavaScript is probably
I don't know about JEP submission process, but you'd first have to solve
the problem that when Java added serialization of parameter names to class
files in Java 8, the OpenJDK devs explicitly decided *not* to expose them
for the JDK itself, on the grounds that they didn't want parameter names to
this may mean, people who do this must work with a patched JDK in the
future.
Right. But I think that's going to be more and more common in future. If
you rely on people installing proprietary stuff like JWS or applets then
it's a bleak future, as the way forward is clearly bundled JREs.
At
I thought Mac OS X has a standard normalization for unicode filenames.
Linux just treats whatever it gets as bytes so it is up to the software
creating the file. Am I correct?
Looks like you are:
https://developer.apple.com/legacy/library/technotes/tn/tn1150.html#UnicodeSubtleties
So HFS+
They were rsynced from Mac OS X.
I said *original* app. Rsync is not the original app and most likely does
not attempt to re-encode or re-normalise Unicode strings.
I feared that. In the end it might be even reasonably doable, if I can
take advantage of some preconditions... for instance:
Do you actually need JAR signatures anyway? The JVM is bundled, it's not
like you have to pass some system security policy beyond Gatekeeper/Windows
code signing.
provides to aid in the
transition.
Also remember FX is open source. You can propose patches !
If there are specific APIs that are missing from FX that are suitable
to be *supported* public APIs then those could be considered here (this
list).
-phil.
On 4/8/2015 9:28 AM, Mike Hearn wrote
For the benefit of the devs on the list, could you please point out what
private APIs you currently need to use? That way we can make sure proper
JIRAs are filed and we can connect those to actual real-world problems.
e.g. handling a double click of a file on MacOS is impossible without
The file HostServicesFactory.java (I cannot find it in the JFX8+ repo)
contains this line of code, for Linux. It should be re-arranged and
extended for better compatibility:
- static final String[] browsers = new String[]{google-chrome,
firefox, opera, konqueror, mozilla};
+ static final
I believe the tricky part is not setting the magic flag in your Info.plist
file but rather handling the GL context changes on the fly. It
requires/would require some code in the Mac GL specific part of JavaFX.
Otherwise if you force it to integrated then some other app causes a switch
to discrete,
The relevant Apple dev doc is here:
https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/technotes/tn2229/_index.html
Essentially it involves setting flags on the GL pixel format. Then you can
receive a callback from the OS either via NSOpenGLView or an old C style
callback which tells you that the active
with the
advent of unity, webgl or even scenegraph impls such as jmonkeyengine that
do.
Sent from my iPhone
On 30 Jun 2015, at 09:42, Felix Bembrick felix.bembr...@gmail.com
wrote:
coughJavaFX has *never* claimed to be write once, run anyway/cough
On 30 Jun 2015, at 18:13, Mike mikeg...@gmail.com
Race free shutdown in multi-threaded programs is always very hard. At
Google some programs and libraries simply didn't support it: for servers,
the cost in terms of bugs and extra code was deemed to outweigh the
benefits, so the only supported way for a process to end was for it to be
killed.
That seems like a roundabout way to do things.
The web tells me: The asciidoctor.js project is a direct port of
Asciidoctor from Ruby to JavaScript using the Opal Ruby-to-JavaScript cross
compiler
Why don't you use JRuby and run the original Asciidoctor code directly in a
background thread?
If there were to be an API for getting basic graphics device data, what
would that look like and would it be hard to write?
My app uses some internal APIs not listed above to query the pixel scale
and whether we're using software/hardware graphics, to reduce usage of some
expensive effects. These
That seems like a great summary Jim, thanks.
UpdateFX has code that can restart a javapackager packaged process, look
here:
https://github.com/vinumeris/updatefx/blob/master/api/src/main/java/com/vinumeris/updatefx/UpdateFX.java#L60
It's not beautiful but it works. You could extract the code and use it in
your app: UpdateFX is Apache
Yes, it can be done, and I have done this in my app. Take a look here:
https://github.com/vinumeris/lighthouse/blob/master/client/src/main/java/lighthouse/Main.java#L474
I do it by taking a snapshot, then blurring that, then cross-fading, then
replacing it with a live blur effect once done. I
One common layout task that seems harder than necessary in JavaFX is to
temporarily remove a node from the scene graph, without having to actually
mess about with the parent container. In HTML you can do use #foo {
display: none; } to hide something temporarily. In JFX you have to remove
from the
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
