W dniu 2010-04-13 20:27, Dennis Clarke pisze:
I started twitching weeks ago. I see a snv_137 has landed but no distro
based on it. Really, we as a community should be rolling our own by now
regardless.
Isn't that what Indiana was all about? To be a meta distribution to help
create other
You (Alex Viskovatoff) ask:
Just out of curiosity, do you know under what OS CERN uses ZFS?
No, but either Solaris 10 or OpenSolaris... ;-)
Matthias
--
Matthias Pfützner | Tel.: +49 700 PFUETZNER | Klaus Kinkel war in China
Lichtenbergstr.73 | mailto:matth...@pfuetzner.de | und
On 31.03.2010 10:06, Orvar Korvar wrote:
If you value your data, you should reconsider. But if your data is not
important, then skip ZFS.
File system data corruption test by researcher:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/storage/?p=169
ZFS data corruption test by researchers:
Dennis,
You (Dennis Clarke) wrote:
I instantly jumped onto the snv_137 tarballs and also started dragging in
everything from jucr this afternoon. I even went and grabbed the Steve
Christensen creation called SFW which is really the Companion CD all grown
up. At least I think it is.
Great,
You (Svein Skogen) wrote:
On 31.03.2010 10:06, Orvar Korvar wrote:
If you value your data, you should reconsider. But if your data is not
important, then skip ZFS.
File system data corruption test by researcher:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/storage/?p=169
ZFS data corruption test by
sorry for the brutal email snip but it is 03:10AM here and I have not
stopped in about 20 hours. I hate to say it .. but I love this stuff.
Such a geek I know :-)
Original Message
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] [ogb-discuss] Call for Action
On 14.04.2010 09:07, Matthias Pfützner wrote:
You (Svein Skogen) wrote:
On 31.03.2010 10:06, Orvar Korvar wrote:
If you value your data, you should reconsider. But if your data is not
important, then skip ZFS.
File system data corruption test by researcher:
You (Svein Skogen) wrote:
Check:
http://storagemojo.com/2007/09/19/cerns-data-corruption-research/
Which is another worthless document, without any info on what
controllers they actually tested with.
I too can make claim about corruption and data loss. But without
pointing
Dennis, thanks for the infos! Have a good sleep!
Here, with the FRAOSUG (Frankfurt, Germany OpenSolaris User Group) meeting
again next week, we again will by driving the participants to more active
participation. Volker A. Brandt did already present on JUICR, so, again, we
will try to activate
On 14.04.2010 09:33, Matthias Pfützner wrote:
You (Svein Skogen) wrote:
Check:
http://storagemojo.com/2007/09/19/cerns-data-corruption-research/
Which is another worthless document, without any info on what
controllers they actually tested with.
I too can make claim about
You (Svein Skogen) wrote:
What's it, your after? That study is more than 2 years old now, and the
RAID-controllers, that didn't work, probably will have updated their FWs by
now.
Ahh, so first you use the papers to prove how superior ZFS is to
raidcontrollers for your data. Then, when
I'm not sure where the problem lies, but:
I am able to load www.namecheap.com with OpenSolaris 2009.06/b134, FreeBSD
7.2/8.0, OpenBSD 4.5/4.6/-current.
I am unable to load the page using OpenSolaris b129 or SXCE b130. Downloaded
Firefox 3.6 from sunfreeware.com/mozilla.html and installed it
Hi all,
Recently one of the servers that my company uses , a Dell R710, attached to 2
Sun JBOD J4400 started to crash quite often.
Finally i got a message in /var/adm/messages that might point to something
usefull, but i don't have the expertise to start to
troubleshooting this problem, so any
Hi Bruno,
Googling for this panic, I see defect 15601
(http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=15601) has been
logged, I suspect by you?
If so, then I think you've already done just about everything I would
expect of a bug finder - you've logged a bug including the panic
message,
Hello,
Most of the official Firefox on Solaris update ports are done over at the
Mozilla FTP site by the Beijing team. You'll see Firefox 3.6.3 there as well as
the new dev release.
I used Seamonkey 2.0.4, Firefox 3.5.8, and Firefox 3.6.3 on the namecheap
website and it instantly loaded.
Which build is the most stable, mainly for NAS?
I plann NAS zfs + CIFS,iSCSI
Thanks
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Because of your requirement of iSCSI, use the latest... ;-)
You (Dmitry) wrote:
Which build is the most stable, mainly for NAS?
I plann NAS zfs + CIFS,iSCSI
Thanks
Matthias
--
Matthias Pfützner | Tel.: +49 700 PFUETZNER | There are good marriages,
Lichtenbergstr.73 |
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org wrote:
sorry for the brutal email snip but it is 03:10AM here and I have not
stopped in about 20 hours. I hate to say it .. but I love this stuff.
Such a geek I know :-)
Original Message
Dennis, ^porting^?
How much porting work was required?
You mean you took the Sun sfw src tarball and compiled it?
GCC was by me, same as binutils, same as the grub bootloader for PowerPC
that you mentioned earlier, bash was by Ken Mays, other bits were done by
the Initworks team.
Martin,
Well we have heard from one of the OGB members about forking this project to
save it from the hands of [b]HOracle[/b] the multi-headed, voracious, open
source devouring monster. So, when and who might be the first step/person to
make this happen to protect what has been done so far?
Been nice
I also have almost this exact same problem on versions since 0906 on both
physical and virtual OpenSolaris/EON builds. I usually have 4 iscsi volumes
coming from the EQL boxes. I can almost always connect to one, but no more
than one and I need all 4.
--
This message posted from
Well we have heard from one of the OGB members about forking this project
to save it from the hands of [b]HOracle[/b] the multi-headed, voracious,
open source devouring monster. So, when and who might be the first
step/person to make this happen to protect what has been done so far?
Been
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Chad Welsh unixphr...@mac.com wrote:
Well we have heard from one of the OGB members about forking this project to
save it from the hands of [b]HOracle[/b] the multi-headed, voracious, open
source devouring monster. So, when and who might be the first
134 dev build, is suitable for this?
can i upgrade it to realese in the future?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org wrote:
Dennis, ^porting^?
How much porting work was required?
You mean you took the Sun sfw src tarball and compiled it?
GCC was by me, same as binutils, same as the grub bootloader for PowerPC
that you mentioned
You (Dmitry) wrote:
134 dev build, is suitable for this?
I assume so, I don't have any specific infos. Some people seem to have a
couple problems with 134, see:
http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=474302tstart=0
can i upgrade it to realese in the future?
Sure!
Greatly appreciated! Thanks!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi
I created a fat32 partition using:
format
formatfdisk
fdisk1
and then C for fat32.
then I exit the fdisk and format. To make sure that the partition is there,
I entered the format and fdisk command and my partition was there (it was
active as well). The disk name is c9t1d4 so I assumed
Close!
All the partitions that end in sN (e.g. s0) are Solaris partitions (aka
slices).
All the Solaris slices reside in one fdisk partition.
All the fdisk partitions end in pN (e.g. p0)
So ...
use:
mount -F pcfs /dev/dsk/c9t1d4p0 /media/s
emike
On 04/14/2010 09:09 AM, Sarah.kho
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Ian Collins i...@ianshome.com wrote:
On 04/13/10 05:39 PM, Martin Bochnig wrote:
www.namecheap.com just takes a while, until it loads.
But the statements relating to www.zoll.de are still valid.
For over 3 weeks I tried to load that site several times per
man mount_pcfs might help... ;-)
The special argument can be one of two special device file
types:
oA floppy disk, such as /dev/diskette0 or
/dev/diskette1.
oA DOS logical drive on a hard disk expressed as
Hi,
Thank you for helping me on this.
before applying mkfs I tried the mount command as follow:
mount -F pcfs /dev/dsk/c9t1d4p0 /media/s
The command returns the following error:
mount: /dev/dsk/c9t1d4p0 is not a DOS filesystem.
So I tried the fstyp command on that partition and it says:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:30 PM, George Koutras koutra...@yahoo.com wrote:
I start shivering to the idea that oracle might drop opensolaris or keep
developing only the Openstorage required portions of it, and adding to that
the sudden silence in indiana-discuss from @oracle.com @sun.com
George Koutras wrote:
the sudden silence in indiana-discuss from @oracle.com @sun.com (last
email on Friday 9/4),
You need to check your mail filters. The archives show mail to indiana-discuss
from oracle.com addresses since then (April 12 as most recent, since yesterday
seems to have been
Seems like this may be equalogic related. I have 16 targets imported into 8
mirrored pools from 4 openfiler systems and I don't seem to have any
problems.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Shawn smmo...@catawba.edu wrote:
I also have almost this exact same problem on versions since 0906 on
Chad Welsh wrote:
So, when and who might be the first step/person to make this happen to
protect what has been done so far?
What would your fork do differently than the main project, besides have almost
no developers working on it, since all the Oracle-paid developers would still be
working on
Okay. So you need following command:
mkfs -F pcfs /dev/rdsk/c9t1d4p1
p0 is whole disk (including the partition table).
Sorry I mistyped the mkfs command in the first e-mail. That was Linux
syntax.
Milan
Dne 14.04.10 16:41, Sarah.kho napsal(a):
Hi,
Thank you for helping me on this.
before
On 04-14-10, Matthias Pfützner matth...@pfuetzner.de wrote:
You (Dmitry) wrote:
134 dev build, is suitable for this?
I assume so, I don't have any specific infos. Some people seem to have a
couple problems with 134, see:
http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=474302tstart=0
Just a completely different question...is there any plans for btrfs ?
Will ZFS and btrfs co-exist or there's a chance that the less used one
would be dropped?
Thanks,
Bruno
On 14-4-2010 16:50, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
George Koutras wrote:
the sudden silence in indiana-discuss from
Did you actually run a Windows format on that partition to get a real PCFS?
The steps you listed only created a PARTITION into which you could then really
create a FAT FS.. But you did not yet really CREATE that FAT FS, right?
Matthias
You (Sarah.kho) wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for helping me
On 14/04/2010 15:56, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Chad Welsh wrote:
So, when and who might be the first step/person to make this happen to protect
what has been done so far?
What would your fork do differently than the main project, besides have almost
no developers working on it, since
On 04/14/10 10:56 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Chad Welsh wrote:
So, when and who might be the first step/person to make this happen to protect
what has been done so far?
What would your fork do differently than the main project, besides have almost
no developers working on it, since
Just a completely different question...is there any plans for btrfs ?
Will ZFS and btrfs co-exist or there's a chance that the less used one
would be dropped?
Which OS supports both?
Linux support brtfs, Solaris supports ZFS.
Casper
___
What ever happens to (Open)Solaris the new version of Solaris (Solaris
Next again Oracle Welcome Session) will surly be based of
OpenSolaris.. I guess the only key word will be Open
Andrew
George Koutras wrote:
I start shivering to the idea that oracle might drop opensolaris or keep
On 04-14-10, Paul Gress pgr...@optonline.net wrote:
I don't think he wants to start a new distro, he's looking to publishb137.
That's about it in a nutshell. I have no shortage of build servers and thus I
was thinking, if this is really open source ( with redistributables ) then a
person
brtfs could be supported on Opensolaris, too. IMO it could even
complement ZFS and spawn some concurrent development between both. ZFS
is too high end and works very poorly with less than 2GB while brtfs
reportedly works well with 128MB on ARM.
Olga
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:31 PM,
Hi Sarah,
You need to type:-
mkfs -Fpcfs -o fat=32 /dev/rdsk/c9t1d4p0:c
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Jennifer Pioch wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Chad Welsh unixphr...@mac.com wrote:
Well we have heard from one of the OGB members about forking this project to save it from
the hands of [b]HOracle[/b] the multi-headed, voracious, open source
devouring monster. So, when and who
Well maybe this distro will communicate with its people besides the ones inside
the company about the status of its latest release since you cut the balls off
the release branch that should have continued.
close to a month of us wondering what the hell happened to 2010.03 and still
nothing to
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 21:03 -0500, weekleyj wrote:
On 4/13/10 8:53 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
weekleyj wrote:
On 4/13/10 5:41 PM, Alex Bisoyannis wrote:
Hi all,
Is pkg.sun.comhttp://pkg.sun.com down?
I am trying to add the extra repo, but I cannot reach th elogin page for
some
I tried to use my EQL support but since it's not happening with Solaris 10,
they don't support opensolaris is what I was told.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
brtfs could be supported on Opensolaris, too. IMO it could even
complement ZFS and spawn some concurrent development between both. ZFS
is too high end and works very poorly with less than 2GB while brtfs
reportedly works well with 128MB on ARM.
Both have license issues; Oracle can now re-license
Or boot off of an USB stick with a tools like RANISH on it, that can easily
create the partition and also create a FS...
http://www.ranish.com/part/
You (Richard Skelton) wrote:
Hi Sarah,
You need to type:-
mkfs -Fpcfs -o fat=32 /dev/rdsk/c9t1d4p0:c
--
Matthias Pfützner | Tel.: +49
Paul Gress wrote:
If their pushing to the main OpenSolaris gates every day, why hasn't
anything been released. Why cannot I upgrade to b135, b136 or b137?
Every previous time we've had a release in progress, updates to /dev stopped
while the release was underway - when 2009.06 was being
Chad Welsh wrote:
Well maybe this distro will communicate with its people besides the ones
inside the company about the status of its latest release since you cut the
balls off the release branch that should have continued.
I assure you I have not touched anyones balls. Attacking the few
of
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Alan Coopersmith
alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
Chad Welsh wrote:
Well maybe this distro will communicate with its people besides the ones
inside the company about the status of its latest release since you cut the
balls off the release branch that should
C. Bergström wrote:
#2 TOG doesn't own the code in question. IBM is afaik the copyright
holder on the wide character things you're referencing in libc. TOS
only handles the UNIX tm and certification. (I know I've talked with
them quite a bit) As others have talked about the Citrus wide
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Paul Gress pgr...@optonline.net wrote:
On 04/14/10 10:56 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Chad Welsh wrote:
So, when and who might be the first step/person to make this happen to
protect what has been done so far?
What would your fork do differently than the
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Alan Coopersmith
alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
Chad Welsh wrote:
So, when and who might be the first step/person to make this happen to
protect what has been done so far?
What would your fork do differently than the main project, besides have almost
no
The question wasn't very clear, so here are my apologies.
I was trying to ask if Oracle/Sun will maintain 2 different filesystems
, ZFS and btrfs in two different platforms Open/Solaris and Linux, or if
something can be merged along the way...
I can imagine alot of customers with running linux
2010/4/14 C. Bergström codest...@osunix.org:
Jennifer Pioch wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Chad Welsh unixphr...@mac.com wrote:
Well we have heard from one of the OGB members about forking this project
to save it from the hands of [b]HOracle[/b] the multi-headed, voracious,
open
2010/4/14 Jennifer Pioch piochjenni...@googlemail.com:
2010/4/14 C. Bergström codest...@osunix.org:
Jennifer Pioch wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Chad Welsh unixphr...@mac.com wrote:
Well we have heard from one of the OGB members about forking this project
to save it from the
On 04/14/10 12:12 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Paul Gress wrote:
If their pushing to the main OpenSolaris gates every day, why hasn't
anything been released. Why cannot I upgrade to b135, b136 or b137?
Every previous time we've had a release in progress, updates to /dev stopped
while
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Paul Gress pgr...@optonline.net wrote:
On 04/14/10 12:12 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Paul Gress wrote:
If their pushing to the main OpenSolaris gates every day, why hasn't
anything been released. Why cannot I upgrade to b135, b136 or b137?
Every previous
Hi Brian,
First off all let me thank you for your time spent on reading this issue.
Regarding your comments , yes the defect 15601 has been logged by me .I
will keep all those informations stored somewhere, and meantime if
required i can upload the core file , and i haven't done so because i'm
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.orgwrote:
On 04-14-10, Paul Gress pgr...@optonline.net wrote:
I don't think he wants to start a new distro, he's looking to
publishb137.
That's about it in a nutshell. I have no shortage of build servers and thus
I was
On 04/14/10 01:11 PM, Martin Bochnig wrote:
How can it appear to be ^frozen^?
Then maybe you are not subscribed to the right lists.
Appears and actual are two different things. What I mean by appears is
nothing has been published as in some form of a binary release for me to
upgrade
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Martin Bochnig mar...@martux.org wrote:
During my life experience I learned one thing for sure: Distrust and
impatience DESTROY EVERYTHING.
Exactly, Oracle should pay attention to that.
My analogy on this situation is like the drug pusher giving drugs to
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Paul Gress pgr...@optonline.net wrote:
On 04/14/10 01:11 PM, Martin Bochnig wrote:
How can it appear to be ^frozen^?
Then maybe you are not subscribed to the right lists.
Appears and actual are two different things. What I mean by appears is
nothing has
On 04/14/10 01:34 PM, Giovanni Tirloni wrote:
Sounds like you are experienced ;-)
Personal attacks rarely will help you make your point so please stop it.
I didn't take is as a personal attack, I saw the smiley face, it was
meant as a joke.
Paul
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Paul Gress pgr...@optonline.net wrote:
On 04/14/10 01:34 PM, Giovanni Tirloni wrote:
Sounds like you are experienced ;-)
Personal attacks rarely will help you make your point so please stop it.
I didn't take is as a personal attack, I saw the smiley
Hello, I decided to forward this message, as most people seem to
ignore the coding related lists.
Maybe the subject gives a first clue or indicator, what Oracle plans
for the future: Maybe the name 2009.06 stays the current release for a
few more weeks. Whatever. It does not matter, because this
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
But the difference was the community was informed. It appears that everything
was frozen. I must say that I'm getting nervous. I've been waiting since
around the later b120's for b135, as this marked the first release with NWAM
phase 1. Now I see not even
They need their Opensolaris.
THEIR?
Who owns that distribution?
And: if it's their's, they should be building it themselfes...
Really, it seems, you do know what a community is, and how open source
works...
Matthias
___
opensolaris-discuss
2010/4/14 Matthias Pfützner matth...@pfuetzner.de:
They need their Opensolaris.
THEIR?
Who owns that distribution?
And: if it's their's, they should be building it themselfes...
Really, it seems, you do know what a community is, and how open source
works...
Matthias
You
While we're at it... I am running b134 and use the dev branch; when 2010.new
comes out, how do I switch and stick with that until we get further along
towards the 2010.Fall ( assuming these release issues get resolved)?
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Giovanni Tirloni
I can't manage that from my Nokia E71, and, yes, I quoted from a different
email...
Sorry, it's not been directed at you, Martin!
Matthias
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Martin Bochnig mar...@martux.org
An: matth...@pfuetzner.de
Cc: pgr...@optonline.net,
2010/4/14 Matthias Pfützner matth...@pfuetzner.de:
I can't manage that from my Nokia E71, and, yes, I quoted from a different
email...
Sorry, it's not been directed at you, Martin!
Matthias
Ok, no problem.
I can imagine it can be hairy, when sending reply-all from a phone ...
Thanks for
On 04/14/10 01:33 PM, David E. Anderson wrote:
While we're at it... I am running b134 and use the dev branch; when
2010.new comes out, how do I switch and stick with that until we get
further along towards the 2010.Fall ( assuming these release issues get
resolved)?
Just set your client to use
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Derek Cicero derek.cic...@oracle.com wrote:
FYI - Oracle is no longer offering a free OpenSolaris CD shipping program at
this time. As a result, we have removed all links and icons from the
opensolaris.org site. If you would like to download OpenSolaris, please
On 04/14/10 03:17 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 04/14/10 01:33 PM, David E. Anderson wrote:
While we're at it... I am running b134 and use the dev branch; when
2010.new comes out, how do I switch and stick with that until we get
further along towards the 2010.Fall ( assuming these release issues
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Chris Pickett
pkch...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Derek Cicero derek.cic...@oracle.com wrote:
FYI - Oracle is no longer offering a free OpenSolaris CD shipping program at
this time. As a result, we have removed all links and
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Andras Barna andras.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
https://shipit.ubuntu.com/
Oh, thanks for the link.
Maybe Oracle could learn from them. But I'm afraid, they could rather
learn from Oracle!
Because if they ship stuff around for free, work for free and want to
benefit
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
I assure you I have not touched anyones balls.
Attacking the few
f us still willing to communicate in public just
further deteriorates
the communication you're going to get - believe me,
it's damn frustrating
for us as well, and hard as we learn the difference
Martin, this world becomes only bitter cold if people let it down. If
the community, Oracle included, sticks together and cooperates then
the world may become a warmer, more friendly place to all of us.
For your question about 'shipping disks for free' and a note to Derek/Valerie:
Our family get
Canonical after *only* five years of operation became profitable Company.
Uros
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:54:59 +0300
From: mar...@martux.org
To: andras.ba...@gmail.com
CC: website-disc...@opensolaris.org; opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org;
opensolaris-annou...@opensolaris.org
Subject:
On 14/04/2010 20:48, Andras Barna wrote:
https://shipit.ubuntu.com/
And, ironically:
http://www.labnol.org/software/download/order-free-linux-dvd-kits-oracle-shipping-worldwide/3454/
Cheeri,
Calum.
--
CALUM BENSON, Interaction Designer Oracle Corporation, Ireland
mailto:calum.benson at
2010/4/14 ольга крыжановская olga.kryzhanov...@gmail.com:
Martin, this world becomes only bitter cold if people let it down. If
the community, Oracle included, sticks together and cooperates then
the world may become a warmer, more friendly place to all of us.
Hi Olga, no.
The only thing that
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Calum Benson calum.ben...@oracle.com wrote:
On 14/04/2010 20:48, Andras Barna wrote:
https://shipit.ubuntu.com/
And, ironically:
http://www.labnol.org/software/download/order-free-linux-dvd-kits-oracle-shipping-worldwide/3454/
Cheeri,
Calum.
Ohh
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:41:19 +0300, Martin Bochnig mar...@martux.org
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Chris Pickett
pkch...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Derek Cicero derek.cic...@oracle.com
wrote:
FYI - Oracle is no longer offering a free OpenSolaris
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:39:21 +0200, Jennifer Pioch
piochjenni...@googlemail.com wrote:
2010/4/14 C. Bergström codest...@osunix.org:
Jennifer Pioch wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Chad Welsh unixphr...@mac.com
wrote:
Well we have heard from one of the OGB members about forking this
Jennifer Pioch wrote:
2010/4/14 C. Bergström codest...@osunix.org:
Umm..
#1 Roland is only handling the cli bits (Which with his help I replaced a
long time ago in osunix)
No, Roland has an own dropin replacement for libc_i18n.a using the
FreeBSD and AST sources as base for his
https://shipit.ubuntu.com/
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Martin Bochnig mar...@martux.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Chris Pickett
pkch...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Derek Cicero derek.cic...@oracle.com
wrote:
FYI - Oracle is no longer
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Albert Lee tr...@opensolaris.org wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:41:19 +0300, Martin Bochnig mar...@martux.org
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Chris Pickett
pkch...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Derek Cicero
On 04/14/10 03:07 PM, Uros Nedic wrote:
Canonical after *only* five years of operation became profitable Company.
As late as Dec. 2009, Mark Shuttlesworth said they were not yet profitable:
http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/68923.html?wlc=1271278394
Cheers,
-Shawn
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:13:32 +0300, Martin Bochnig mar...@martux.org
wrote:
Hello, I decided to forward this message, as most people seem to
ignore the coding related lists.
Maybe the subject gives a first clue or indicator, what Oracle plans
for the future: Maybe the name 2009.06 stays the
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Albert Lee tr...@opensolaris.org wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:13:32 +0300, Martin Bochnig mar...@martux.org
wrote:
Hello, I decided to forward this message, as most people seem to
ignore the coding related lists.
Maybe the subject gives a first clue or
Interesting - I found this:
http://blogs.sun.com/dweibel/entry/solaris_ready_equallogic
It's about Solaris 10, but OpenSolaris will use the new driver also - right?
Note what it says about Equalogic firmware versions.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 03:59:37AM -0700, Paul F wrote:
Basically iSCSI works perfectly under 0906 but not under snv_134.
It's been stuffed for me since at least b~128.
It works when the package is first installed. After a reboot, the svc
start method exits with code 255 and no further clues.
On 14/04/2010 20:55, Ben wrote:
Alan, I agree with everything you say. The problem is, as everyone
keeps saying, that the community that isn't attached to the company
knows nothing about what's going on. It's a tad frustrating getting
nothing from Oracle about the next release.
Slightly
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
