___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--
stephen lau | ste...@opensolaris.org | www.whacked.net
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
://www.opensolaris.org/os/downloads/on/
...
Is this ISO tested? I tried my laptop and vmware and they hang
after grub
I don't even see the ISO download link at the moment, see my screen
shot ...
Tao
Same here... all I see are the MD5 sums.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau
/os/downloads/sol_ex_dvd_1/
--
stephen lau | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.whacked.net
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
be extended the
courtesy of knowing why (even if it's something as vague as someone
sued us - we have to delay it, can't say why - sorry would be fine).
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.whacked.net
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
... just making up something random, paranoid,
and conspiracy-worthy. :-)
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.whacked.net
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Friday.'?
There is a schedule:
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/on/schedule/
That's a schedule for when the ON consolidation closes, but isn't a
schedule for when SXCE builds are made available.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.whacked.net
On 10/23/08 9:17 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
Stephen Lau wrote:
On 10/23/08 8:58 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
Thomas Maier-Komor wrote:
Shawn Walker schrieb:
I'm pretty sure that one-line update would be, it hasn't been
released
because it's not ready yet. :-)
And what about a schedule? Something
,
steve
--
stephen lau | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.whacked.net
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
-based Indiana would be a fine and
welcome addition to an IPS-based Indiana.
I think both sides can agree to disagree and move on.
cheers,
steve
[1] Mandriva/Red Hat over KDE, Ubuntu/Debian, etc. etc.
--
stephen lau | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.whacked.net
On 10/20/08 12:13 PM, Erik Tjernlund wrote:
I've been looking for a way to run the latest unstable version of rtorrent on
my solaris server, but the only pre-compiled version I can find is the
packages Stephen Lau made available on whacked.net (thanks Stephen!)
The problem is that I need
be so kind as to
update the domain record to point to the original name servers?
(Alternatively, assuming you run the ns?.blastwave.org servers, could
you just update those to point to 204.152.191.100?)
Al? Do you happen to have that name server information handy?
cheers,
steve
--
stephen
--
stephen lau | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.whacked.net
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
, then have a try.
--
Quaker
Stephen Lau wrote:
Hi Geeta,
pkginfo -l SUNWiwk says VERSION: 11.11,REV=2008.03.17.17.33,
this is on an Lenovo Thinkpad T61 running snv_81. I notice
occasionally I get bursts of higher-speed, but most of the time it
seems quite slow (around 10kB/sec).
cheers
,
--
Quaker
Stephen Lau wrote:
Hi Quaker,
I tried this again with the OpenSolaris RC2 release (which claims
to be onnv_86), and still observed really really slow/poor performance.
cheers,
steve
Quaker Fang wrote:
Hi Stephen,
You may hit CR6677167, it has been fixed in snv_86, please
-discuss@opensolaris.org
--
stephen lau | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.whacked.net
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Stephen Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Andras Barna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_%28computing%29#Uniform_Naming_Convention
This uses non-standard path name separators
this syntax and cdrecord.
Jason's original post is talking about burning using Nero (I assume on
Windows), in which case UNC paths are still in use.
-steve
--
stephen lau | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.whacked.net
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Mark Phalan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 22:33 -0700, Stephen Lau wrote:
Has anyone had success installing snv_86 on a MacBook or MacBook Pro at
all? I just tried it, following many of the blogs which detailed
workarounds for the installation failure due to 6413235, but strangely I
be indicating?
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.whacked.net
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
here.
Both BootCamp rEFIt seem to be unable to boot it, so I suspect GRUB
hasn't been written out somehow?
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.whacked.net
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
. Seems to work (with WPA2 Personal), but it's
deathly slow. I haven't been able to get more than 10kB/sec out of it.
-steve
--
stephen lau | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.whacked.net
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
that I need to test whether it
will work after copying it to SXCE 85.
Jörg
I've run it on snv_81. Seems to work (with WPA2 Personal), but it's
deathly slow. I haven't been able to get more than 10kB/sec out of it.
-steve
--
stephen lau | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.whacked.net
no there.
uname -a
SunOS foobar 5.11 snv_85 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-2500
which wget
/usr/sfw/bin/wget
--ron
Derek is talking about wget support from the SDLC, not wget the binary.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.whacked.net
to have to live on
the SDLC.
Moral of the story? Use unencumbered stuff and your life will be easier
and registration-free. :)
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.whacked.net
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris
good competition for Exchange.
S
That's fantastic - thanks for the pointer Steve.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.whacked.net
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
@opensolaris.org
--
stephen lau | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.whacked.net
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
that may help me solve this
problem? Any lead will be appreciated. Thanks.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--
stephen lau | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.whacked.net
.
When it did not work, it gave me more trouble than I was willing to accept,
thus, I gave up. Ain´t gonna mess around with the hostname ¨unknown¨.
You could put an alias for 'unknown' for 127.0.0.1 in your /etc/hosts
then, that should fix things.
--
stephen lau | [EMAIL PROTECTED
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--
stephen lau | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.whacked.net
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
their front door.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.whacked.net
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
for help, and got a lack of response - then yes, the
process is broken.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.whacked.net
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
; but again, someone has to trigger the script.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.whacked.net
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--
stephen lau | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.whacked.net
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
?
I'm sorry, but I just don't get it. Not in the least bit.
-ian
--
stephen lau | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.whacked.net
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
board message.
For anyone who cares, it's been happening on the private OGB mailing
list, and resulted in the draft Keith sent to ogb-discuss earlier.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.whacked.net
___
opensolaris-discuss
distro, and (b) allow compatible distros to use the OpenSolaris trademark?
There is none.
Possibly not necessary to have, but certainly polite and
credibility-enhancing,
IMO.
Indeed, it would have been polite, wouldn't it.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau | [EMAIL PROTECTED
will get more focused topical support and mail by a Sun Ray mailing
list. BigAdmin references on here:
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/jsp/descFile.jsp?url=descAll/sunrayusers_mailing
which looks to be pretty good. I would suggest signing up at that list
instead.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau | [EMAIL
Brandorr wrote:
What is the better Virt engine for Solaris?
I wasn't able to get snv_73 to work successfully with Fusion on my
MacBook. It installed fine but never got anywhere past GRUB. It seems
to work fine under Parallels though.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau | [EMAIL PROTECTED
J Duff wrote:
I would like to download the source and closed bins for snv_70b. I understand
this is a relatively stable version since it will become the next Developer
Edition, and therefore receives more testing. If there is an snv_70c
(hopefully even more stable), I would like to download
workspace is linked
on the page above - pull it and then dmake instal
in usr/src/tools
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/scm/SUNWonbld/
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
___
opensolaris
is build 70b.
SXCE is currently at build 72.
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
so its
possible the bug reports got dropped. Please refile them if you can.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
still redistribution of the source.
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
for something
that is stable and still updated semi-frequently, you should be running
the SXDE releases.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
___
opensolaris
-
hopefully it stands up better now ;-)
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
manually updating the URL
everytime a new build is released..
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
/onnv-gate is
broken entirely; apologies for the outage - it should be restored soon.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
/... wait until it's solidified a bit more?
OGB official signoff, and proper integration into the site I guess... Or is
the former bureaucracy-heavy?
There's no need for it to have OGB official signoff.
-steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris
booting the opensolaris.org
infrastructure (to net install all our machines), and I thought it was
pretty straightforward..
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
___
opensolaris
Subject: Auto-response for your message to the cab-discuss mailing list
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This list is retired, please use [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
Korey Peters wrote:
To Ian Murdoch and the Open Solaris Community,
^^^
nit: it's Murdock.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
)
finished the last phase of its
lets-try-to-actually-deliver-on-our-promises power circuit upgrade.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
, something went wrong at the datacentre level and we will follow
up with them to make sure things are rectified for future outages.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
:
http://linux.slashdot.org/linux/07/07/19/0414258.shtml
359 distros. Are you still firm on 'not abhorring the Linux
fragmentation'?
Yup.
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 09:53 -0700, Stephen Lau wrote:
UNIX admin wrote:
Do you MEAN that OpenSolaris distro only thats short
list ?
I do not believe that there would be very many happy people in the Solaris
community if we started seeing a number forks, pardon
Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 18:27 -0700, Glenn Lagasse wrote:
* Kaiwai Gardiner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 09:53 -0700, Stephen Lau wrote:
UNIX admin wrote:
Do you MEAN that OpenSolaris distro only thats short
list ?
I do not believe that there would
don't know, but given current marketshare - I'd bet that that support
would come on Linux before it came on Solaris - multiple distributions
and all.
... anyway, let's just agree to disagree. All this has completely
deviated from my original point. :)
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL
associative
cache when it's in fact a 32-way is a bug in the way we're querying the
CPUID function on the VIA chip (or a bug in the way we're interpreting
the response); so we need to find out what the correct query is, and how
to correctly interpret it.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL
/b68
Or you can clone the tag 'onnv_68' from the Mercurial repository at:
ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/hg/onnv/onnv-gate
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
affects people who tried to build between the fwflash putback
(happened on last Friday) until my putback fixing it just now.
So if your repository is updated to either onnv_68 or onnv_69 (when it
gets tagged next Monday), you'll be fine.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED
instruction set
should work.
I don't believe all Pentium 4's were 64-bit... but I may be wrong.
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Stephen Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS: Thank you, Sun, for forcing us to fork your own project. Thank you
Sun did no such thing.
You can not force a person to do anything they either can't or won't do.
You can't force Sun to contribute work any more than Sun can
couldn't do on os.o.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
.
You can subscribe someone as moderated so that they receive all
postings, but can't post themselves. Effectively it's read-only.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
James Carlson wrote:
Stephen Lau writes:
You can subscribe someone as moderated so that they receive all
postings, but can't post themselves. Effectively it's read-only.
Right ... that's what I meant about simple.
What I'd really like is to have the ability for users to specify
themselves
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Boutilier wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen Lau wrote:
I still maintain that identity and 'creating a mark' are not issues
that should involve the OGB. The OGB should be about governance,
not a generic leadership board
Stephen Lau wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And further to that, does the community group have the power to
award that kind of prize in OpenSolaris's name?
No, but it (the CG) has the power to conduct all the investigation
research and request either the OGB to approve it or request
Holger Berger wrote:
On 6/21/07, Stephen Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A couple of months ago, Mark (on behalf of the C-Team, I believe)
suggested reorganising the ON community, onnv project, and associated
mailing lists.
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-discuss/2007-April
Dave Miner wrote:
[removed opensolaris-code for this specific question]
Stephen Lau wrote:
...
The reason I ask is with the advent of
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and the move to make
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a mandatory subscription for all
registered users; the OGB would like to move project delivery
Dave Miner wrote:
Stephen Lau wrote:
Dave Miner wrote:
[removed opensolaris-code for this specific question]
Stephen Lau wrote:
...
The reason I ask is with the advent of
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and the move to make
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a mandatory subscription for
all registered users; the OGB
the discussion there.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
from our new mailman machine.
We're investigating it now.
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
for these sorts of announcements.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
project is approved.
There is no longer a need to hash out discussion on opensolaris-discuss
and solicit feedback via this forum.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
.
Why not go to OpenOffice.org? Why not go to Java.com?
They are just as (un)related.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
.
You quoted Keith incompletely. The point he was trying to make was that
the OGB should not be micro-managing every last little decision. If it
were, then OpenSolaris would be moving at an even slower pace.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
steps to contribute to OpenSolaris (in Input Methods), but it will
take us some time.
Where did you see Sun sales being condescending?
-steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
baseless accusations.
Grow up, and take your medication already.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
problems are and how friction loss may be avoided.
We've had projects run by people inside and outside of Sun for a while now.
-steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
features it offers.
-steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
sort of thing? That'd be kind of interesting to consider to maintain
some cross-distribution compatibility as more distributions crop up.
I like the idea of providing a base reference distribution for other
distributions to then easily derive from.
+1 from me.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau
/os/downloads/on/
Vermillion 62
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/jds/downloads/current/
Thanks,
Paul
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http
that divorcing the community from our release process
is helpful, in that the community has to start thinking about its own
release process.
+1, or seconded, or I agree, or whatever phrase is appropriate to show
my agreement.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845
an on-discuss, I'd just as soon follow-up
discussion be sent to opensolaris-code or something.
on-all may have been [ab]used in this fashion, but not enough to warrant
its own list.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel
and choosing a new motherboard option
means reengineering, requalifying, and recertifying every new design.
It's one thing when you are in a market dominant position like Microsoft
to say it's my way or the highway - but Sun is *not* in that position
with Solaris.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau
backend)
I want to get my Yukon NIC up - go to Marvell's site.
etc. etc.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris
constraints. It's not always as simple as drawing lines between two
companies and saying we should now have a driver.
In any case, Intel 3945abg support is coming; but I'm sure it's not
trivial, so please be patient.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http
not an easy path) do everything we could to help The
Cause, why can't they?
What leads you to believe that Sun's Taiwanese employees aren't using SX
at home or in the office?
-steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
as the person probably most guilty for filling
tools-discuss with threads related to a project (SCM Migration), it
seems okay to me. ;-)
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
-discuss@opensolaris.org
Are you subscribed to the opensolaris-announce mailing list? Most of
the build deliveries notifications are sent there.
cheers,
steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b60
-steve
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
means.
How is it available by other means?
--
stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net
opensolaris // solaris kernel development
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
1 - 100 of 322 matches
Mail list logo
