Hi (probably) Richard,
Compaq TCP/IP Services for OpenVMS Alpha Version V5.3
on a AlphaServer 1200 5/533 4MB running OpenVMS V7.3
Builds and tests OK.
When I go to build WASD against it the compiler complained SSL_LOCL.H
couldn't include "e_os.h". I compared the 0.9.7 to previous
distribution
Dear all,
I get error messages when I tryed to compile the latest version of
openssl.
I attach a logfile of make
OpenSSL self-test report:
OpenSSL version: 0.9.6d
Last change: Fix crypto/asn1/a_sign.c so that 'parameters' is
omitte...
Options: -mips4
OS (uname): IRIX gold 6
On Sun, 14 Jul 2002, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 14 Jul 2002 17:53:45
>+0200 (METDST), "Lutz Jaenicke via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> rt> This problem has already been reported before twice, but as no member
> rt> of the OpenSSL de
Your environment assumes something called 'pod2man'.
installing man1/CA.pl.1
./pod2mantest: pod2man: not found
sh: pod2man: not found
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `install_docs'
# I am running SPARC Solaris 8
# What I did to hack past it
cd openssl-0
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
> The attached patch contains my suggestion. Would you mind looking
> it over and comment on it, perhaps even test it?
The patch (djgpp.last-patch) doesn't work as posted to RT, but I think
that I have modified it to what you intended. Also t
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 21
>Jul 2002 13:33:56 -0700 (PDT), Doug Kaufman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> dkaufman> The patch (djgpp.last-patch) doesn't work as posted to RT, but I think
> dkaufman> that I have modif
"Lutz Jaenicke via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Jul 21 21:58:06 2002]:
#
# > Your environment assumes something called 'pod2man'.
# >
# > installing man1/CA.pl.1
# > ./pod2mantest: pod2man: not found
# > sh: pod2man: not found
# > *** Error code 1
#
# This problem sho
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote:
> I understand, however, why you made that change, now that I looked a
> little more closely at the rest of the changes. I made the following
> change to your change:
>
> --- /home/levitte/dist/dummytest.c2002-07-22 18:08:01.
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
> After all the discussions, I think we reached concensus. The change I
> just committed should work. I'll resolve this ticket.
The extra pair of parentheses does the trick. The dummytest.c file seems
to work now. Thanks for getting this fix
Hello...
FYI that I had to add OpenSSLDie to util\libeay.num and add
"crypto/cryptlib.h" to $crypto in util\mkdef.pl in order to get the DLL
versions of 0.9.6e to build on Win32. This probably affects all other
versions that were patched today as well.
Ryan Koski
Wells Fargo - Cryptography
_
Hi,
I tried to compile the latest version of openssl-0.9.6e on Windows 2000
using Microsoft Visual C++ 6.0 and it failed to link the ssleay32.dll.
This is happening because cryptlib.obj isn't getting linked in. I added the
symbol to the SSLOBJ definition in ms\ntdll.mak.
The diff for the fix is
OK.. Sorry about that.. my mailer may be slow as well
Thanks for the response
Steven A. Bade (Steve)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Software Craftsman
IBM LTC Network Security
Phone (512)838-4799 (T/L 678)
"Lutz Jaenicke via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi (probably) Richard,
Compaq TCP/IP Services for OpenVMS Alpha Version V5.3
on a AlphaServer 1200 5/533 4MB running OpenVMS V7.3
Compaq C V6.5-001 on OpenVMS Alpha V7.3
has some minor issues for me (hope it's still intelligable).
~
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Jon Peatfield wrote:
> Looking through the rest of the 0.9.6e patch I can't see any other
> cases where realloc() is called like this but I might well have missed
> some. I'm hoping that someone who understands the code better will
> confirm/check this.
Might it not be bet
The "-V" ZIP of the .LIS files was a little big for my mailer Richard.
I have placed it at
http://wasd.vsm.com.au/wasd_tmp/
On the other issue. After the latest OpenSSL build and after a relink
it seems to work. This is obviously some issue with my original build.
I will go back to scratc
Hi again Richard,
something else I've noticed while playing around with my own issues.
During the build I get an occasional
%DCL-W-TKNOVF, command element is too long - shorten
apparently when attempting a WRITE SYS$OUTPUT as in
An example is [.APPS]MAKEAPPS.COM
$! Show user the result
The FAQ page that appears when following the FAQ tab on
the www.openssl.org home page is empty
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTE
#make install
gcc -o rsa_test -I../include -fPIC -DTHREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN
-DHAVE_DLF
CN_H -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -DB_ENDIAN -DBN_DIV2W rsa_test.o -L..
-lcry
pto -lsocket -lnsl -ldl
making all in tools...
created directory `/usr/local/ssl'
created directory `/usr/local/ssl/ma
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
> This ticket is currently stalled. Is this still an issue, or can I
> change the state of this ticket to resolved?
The fix was committed in mid July. You can change the status to
resolved.
Doug
__
Doug Kaufman
Int
I recently tried to compile the August 9th snapshot of openssl 0.9.7
with static zlib enabled. The build failed because Configure only adds
"-lz" for dynamic zlib. I think that this patch fixes the problem.
Doug
--- openssl-0.9.7-beta3/Configure.orig Thu Aug 1 14:06:26
I recently tried to build the August 9th snapshot of openssl 0.9.7 on
a sun sparc machine running sunos 4.1.3_U1. This failed in several
areas. Here are the changes I made to allow it to compile, but I am
not sure that these are the correct fixes. The main problems: this
version of sunos doesn't
Hello all
"Unchecked return from gmtime in ASN1 time set routine can cause core dump on
Windows"
I found this problem when debugging 'nmake test' for Net::SSLeay.
openssl is called:
openssl.exe req
-config examples/req.conf
-x509
-day
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 15
>Aug 2002 19:17:27 -0700 (PDT), Doug Kaufman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> dkaufman> I recently tried to build the August 9th snapshot of openssl 0.9.7 on
> dkaufman> a sun sparc machin
hello Olaf
ich have the same problem with the
openssl bad serial number length
its also with the 2. request with my self -signed ca
but now i have suse 6.4 with 2.2.14
and there ich can't find the file ca.c
is there another way to solve the problem, probably installing another
version of o
In compiling MySql-4.0.2-alpha, I get the following error messages
related to OpenSSL shown below.
Using STRINGS to check the differences between OpenSSL-0.9.6a and
OpenSSL-0.9.7-beta3 shows "OpenSSL_add_all_algorithms" in 0.9.6a but not
in 0.9.7-beta3:
=== OpenSSL-0.9.6a ==
Just a quick update... I should have submitted this *long* ago.
The below patch allows for OpenSSL under A/UX.
--- Configure.orig Thu Aug 22 15:10:28 2002
+++ Configure Thu Sep 5 16:17:03 2002
@@ -495,6 +495,9 @@
"rhapsody-ppc-cc","cc:-O3 -DB_ENDIAN::(unknown)::BN_LLONG RC4_CHAR RC4_CHU
Functions like d2i_RSAPrivateKey are poorly documented at present: the
docs just say "..." for all sections.
Since I investigated how to use them, I've written documentation,
attached.
__
OpenSSL Project
Hello every body.
Thanks a lot for your nice job, meanwhile there a little bug in
'apps/rand.c'
Operating system: ALL
OpenSsl: 0.9.6g engine
The original code, from line 45
while (!badopt && argv[++i] != NULL)
{
if (strcmp(argv[i], "-out") == 0)
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Robert Esposito via RT wrote:
> When I try and install the software, I get an error after I run "make
> install". It says "cannot create directory usr/local/include/openssl:
> permission denied". Can you please help me get past this?
You need to either install under a login
Andy Polyakov wrote:
> How do we know that these are not or should not be treated as mingw64
> bugs? I mean it worked for mingw for years (I wonder how by the way),
> now ancestor is *being developed* and how come it's not its fault:-)
I don't really understand that part about "ancestor", but nev
Variables inserted in s_server -www output are not HTML-escaped. For
example:
$ mv server.key 'hoiserver.key'
$ openssl s_server -cert server.crt -key 'hoiserver.key' -www
...
$ curl -s -k https://localhost:4433/ | grep hoi
s_server -cert server.crt -key hoiserver.key -www
When viewed in a brows
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 08:45:12AM +0200, Sander Temme via RT wrote:
> 2) Have the engine provide its own callbacks that get set in case the
> application does not provide (presumably more suitable) alternatives:
I think it would be entirely sensible for OpenSSL to offer a build-time
configurat
Hi,Sorry for the late reply, I did not subscrive to the mailing list (and
therfore did not receive the replies from Rafael & Kyle ) , so just to
clarify I was using Apache HTTPd 2.2.9 and had issues with its bundled
version of openSSL which was 0.9.8h , I understood correctly the issue is
now fixe
Please find below a patch, with spec reference, against OpenSSL 0.9.7g.
It could be argued that XMLENC spec is wrong in insisting on unpredictable
values for the padding because this allows padding to be used as a
covert channel. However, to deploy interoperable implementations it seems
patching
Hi,
I've created the RT entry above before noticing that I cannot further edit
it, sorry! Here are the relevant details to add:
The function X509_NAME_add_entry has the following bug: When called with
"loc == 0" and "set == 0", the local variable "inc" is set using "inc =
(set == 0) ? 1 : 0;"
Hi,
an additional bug in the same function, triggered with the same setup:
The loop for incrementing the "set" value (near the end of the function)
has to increment at index "i" and not at index "i-1".
Regards, Frank
__
OpenS
Thanks very much for replying back Steve, I'd much appreciate whatever
you can do here because we need the 0.9.8 features but also need to be
able to set the CSP name in order for certificates to be imported
correctly into Windows servers.
Thanks,
Evan
On 5/13/05, Stephen Henson via RT <[EMAIL
Hi,
I tested the OpenSSL library (version 0.9.7.g) using the server SSL cache and I
found it's extremely slow when the client and server applications are on
different PC's(4 requests and responses per second). If they are both on the
same computer it can handle about 100 or more.
I use 2 Pen
Hi again,
I tested the server application of the previsiuos email calculating the time
interval from the SSl_read to SSL_write and on remote connection it takes almost
100 times more than on local test.
I hope this helps.
Thanks
Navi
OpenSSL self-test report:
OpenSSL version: 0.9.8-beta2
Last change: Add attribute functions to EVP_PKEY structure. Modify...
Options: enable-threads enable-shared enable-zlib no-gmp no-krb5
no-mdc2 no-rc5 no-zlib-dynamic
OS (uname): SunOS shadow 5.10 Generic_118844-01 i86pc
There is one problem with beta-3 which also occurred in earler
versions, but which I had overlooked, since no errors were generated.
On DJGPP, install_docs stops after installing man1/CA.pl.1. No other
man pages were installed. The rest of the installation went fine. I
believe that this occurs bec
The separate tree was constructed per the instructions in INSTALL
mkdir -p objtree/"`uname -s`-`uname -r`-`uname -m`"
cd objtree/"`uname -s`-`uname -r`-`uname -m`"
(cd $OPENSSL_SOURCE; find . -type f) | while read F; do
mkdir -p `dirname $F`
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue May 31 17:03:31 2005]:
>
> > There is one problem with beta-3 which also occurred in earler
> > versions, but which I had overlooked, since no errors were generated.
> > On DJGPP, install_docs stops after installing man1
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's not fixed in Beta5.
Nick Briggs
PARC
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager
making all in tools...
./pod2mantest: pod2man: not found
pod2man does not work properly ('BasicTest' failed). Looking for another
pod2man ...
No working pod2man found. Consider installing a new version.
As a workaround, we'll use a bundled old copy of pod2man.pl.
installing man1/CA.pl.1
instal
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
> The real issue was the backslahes in the configuration definition for
> DJGPP and how those interacted with the handling of a build environment
> in the Makefiles.
>
> I resolved the issue by moving the definition of DEVRANDOM for DJGPP
> f
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Jun 12 03:21:44 2005]:
>
> > On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
> >
> > > Whatever the problem is, I do not agree with removing 'set -e'.
> >Setting
> > > -e ensures that an error that happens within
This problem was reported as fixed in beta5, but it is neither fixed in
beta5 nor in beta6.
Please reopen this problem report.
snip ---
Since you've disabled or enabled at least one algorithm, you need to do
the following before building:
make depend
Configured for solaris-sparcv8-
During installation:
installing man3/OPENSSL_Applink.3
../../util/pod2man.pl: Improper man page - no dash in NAME header in paragraph
3 of OPENSSL_Applink.pod
.3 => OPENSSL_Applink.3
installing man3/OPENSSL_ia32cap.3
../../util/pod2man.pl: Improper man page - no dash in NAME header in paragra
On April 24th, I wrote to openssl-dev:
> Also, the function "dir_ctrl" in crypto/x509/by_dir.c looks wrong to
> me. Shouldn't it be checking for the environment variable first, then
> getting the default if no environment variable is specified (the way
> by_file_ctrl does in crypto/x509/by_file.c
The OpenSSL 0.9.8-stable snapshot from 24 June 2005 configures,
builds, tests, and installs without problem on DJGPP. The default cert
file and directory also work as expected, whether or not
SSL_CERT_FILE and SSL_CERT_DIR are defined in the environment.
Thanks.
Doug
--
Dou
I sent the following on 21 June, but I don't see where it actually made
it to the list or to the archives. Sorry if it turns out to be a
duplicate.
The beta6 of openssl 0.9.8 compiles, tests, and installs on DJGPP
without any problems that I see. There is just one warning during the
compilation,
> So the bug report can be removed, right?
Yes, the report can be removed. It is not a bug.
> (and *please* keep [EMAIL PROTECTED] among the recipients. It's quite
> hard to follow history in the database when people keep skipping that
> address)
Apologies.
nagendra
Would You please apply the second DIFF file in sead of the first one ?
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Henson via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 2:14 AM
Subject: [openssl.org #1109] Ticket Resolved
> According to our records, your requ
I mean this one:
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Henson via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 2:14 AM
Subject: [openssl.org #1109] Ticket Resolved
> According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have any
> further questi
The one with additional config options was the first one.
The one without config options is better (according to me) and is the second
one.
Both are working.
Just the second one does not need config options.
Do You need a diff file between the latest "ca.c - version 1.150" and my
second dif
I just checked. As I see there are actually 3 diff files there
(http://www.aet.tu-cottbus.de/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=1109):
1. File difference report generated by CSDiff by ComponentSoftware on
13.6.2005 Ç. 13:19 - 3.3KB
2. --- openssl-0.9.8-beta5/apps/ca.c.oldFri Apr 15 21:29:34 200
If You think so Ok then ;)
Let's leave it as it is. Thank You very much and once again sorry for the
inconvenience.
Best regards
Stefan
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Henson via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 3:26 AM
S
hello,
tried to compile 0.9.8 and got the following errors:
/gmake -f ../Makefile.shared -e \
APPNAME=openssl OBJECTS="openssl.o verify.o asn1pars.o req.o
dgst.o dh.o dhparam.o enc.o passwd.o gendh.o errstr.o ca.o pkcs7.o
crl2p7.o crl.o rsa.o rsautl.o dsa.o dsaparam.o ec.o ecparam.o x5
When built under Cygwin, with the -mno-cygwin option, OpenSSL
0.9.8 builds, tests, and installs fine (only tested with no-idea
no-shared). I noticed, however, that I was getting 5 warnings from
gcc. The attached patch should fix the warnings. When tested against
0.9.8-stable-SNAP-20050709, with th
For some reason, openssl suddenly wants to add -ldl when linking the
test programs. That is uncalled for, I specifically added no-dso to the
Configure options.
Please reverse this.
Felix
__
OpenSSL Project
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
to my former mail (sent to you few hours ago) with text:
"""
I was unable to pass the "make test" command when building openssl 0.9.8. I
tried it first with some optimization flags (-O3 -march=pentium4
-mtune=pentium4) with gcc 3.4.1, again without them and at last with default
flags as they
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [openssl.org #1171] Unable to pass make test 2
> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:39:36 +0200 (METDST)
> From: Andy Polyakov via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: openssl-dev@openssl.org
>
>
>> test BN_
Andy Polyakov via RT wrote:
test BN_sqr
make[2]: *** [test_bn] Error 139
>>>
>>>Could you examine
>>>https://www.aet.tu-cottbus.de/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=1146 and see if
>>>you confirm that it's identical problem.
>>
>>
>>I am sorry but I cannot reproduce the problem any more. I did th
Andy Polyakov via RT wrote:
test BN_sqr
make[2]: *** [test_bn] Error 139
>>>
>>>Could you examine
>>>https://www.aet.tu-cottbus.de/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=1146 and see if
>>>you confirm that it's identical problem.
>>
>>
>>I am sorry but I cannot reproduce the problem any more. I did th
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This may be a false alarm, but I have just built
OpenSSL 0.9.7g on Solaris 10 (sparc). Everything
appears o.k. until I run make test and I get this.
I regret that I am not expert enough to pin down
what the exact problem might be. Here is the output
of make report, however.
Regards
Ra
We have implemented a part of a new Intenet Draft called "Pre-Shared
Key Ciphersuites for Transport Layer Security (TLS)" [1], and we would
like to contribute it to the OpenSSL project.
According to the Abstract section of the draft: "This document
specifies three sets of new ciphersuites for the
Hello,
I have traced again and found out that
c_zlib.c::zlib_compress_block()
is responsible that wrec->length is sometimes
44 (korrect value) and sometimes 45 (troublesome value)
I'm using zlib 1.2.3 !!!
for length 45 I'm getting the trouble
with the SSP_OP_T
Hi
We have ported the openSSL code for our project.We use SSL to
authenticate the users who use FTP to the controller(which is basically
a printer). We have different groups such as developer, user, designer
etc. each will have access permissions
I am facing a problem with the DES encryption fo
org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #1206] FTP USER Authentication
[EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT wrote:
> Hi
>
> We have ported the openSSL code for our project.We use SSL to
> authenticate the users who use FTP to the controller(which is
> basically a printer). We have different groups such as d
r 23, 2005 2:39 PM
To: Swathika Subramaniam (WT01 - Embedded Systems)
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #1206] FTP USER Authentication
[EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT wrote:
> We use DES encryption algorithm.When the user try to add an user with
> the password 12345678 ,user co
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 12:30 +0200, ext via RT wrote:
> I am working with the patch and I noticed that the psk hint and id are
> asciiz. This is not in the spec.
> Also, there is no way to specify no psk_id_hint/psk_id. According to
> the spec, the pure psk suites can omit the key exchange.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
hi all,
i'd reported both of these when 0.9.8 first came out.
as of the 098a release, they're still, apparently, unresolved.
(1)
building 0.9.8a on OSX 10.4.2,
'make install' fails @
...
making install in engines...
i
andy,
> (2)
> after install, note:
>
>
> for v0.9.8a:
> otool -L libssl.dylib:
> libssl.0.9.8.dylib (compatibility version 0.9.8, current version 0.9.8)
> libcrypto.0.9.8.dylib (compatibility version 0.9.8, current version
> 0.9.8)
> /usr/local/lib/libgmp.3.dylib (compatibility
What is the status of the PSK patch ? Is any of the OpenSSL developers
looking at it now or going to look at it in the near future ? At least
the request tracker page
http://www.aet.tu-cottbus.de/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=1191
does not seem to show any recent activity. If the developers need any
Dear Support,
I tried to install openssl on my system and got an error in 'make test'.
The last lines of the protocoll are:
...
../util/shlib_wrap.sh ./sha512t
Testing SHA-512 .
TEST 2 of 3 failed.
make[1]: *** [test_sha] Fehler 1
make[1]: Verlassen des Verzeichnisses »/root/openssl-0.9.8a/test«
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sometime in the last few months, changes were made to e_os2.h in
the stable 0.9.8 series, which broke the DJGPP build. It looks
like a cleanup was made, removing OPENSSL_SYSNAME_WIN16, but the
OPENSSL_SYSNAME_MSDOS code appears to have been accidentally removed.
I see that none of the platforms ge
---> see below
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of via RT
>Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 2:17 PM
>To: Kämpfe, Christiane
>Cc: openssl-dev
@openssl.org
>Subject: [openssl.org #1204] bug report - 0.9.8 and bad record
>mac because of wr
g report - 0.9.8 and bad
>record mac because of wrong SSL_OP_TLS_BLOCK_PADDING_BUG handling
>
>
>Greetings!
>
>On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] via
>RT wrote:
>
>> >The bug seems to be reproduced without compression (s_client reports
>> >than both Compr
Hi.
I'm using 0.9.8a on NetBSD 1.x.
crypto/pkcs7/pk7_smime.c
In case, user selected type is signed and detached,
never setting type pkcs7 object, in time PKCS7_dataInit() called.
crypto/pkcs7/pk7_doit.c
in that's case,
293 line call and make BIO_mem buffer, because 287 line never called.
thanks
A bug in pqueue_find() causes the priority of
the last item to get clobbered.
Patch included in next email. Only DTLS is(was) affected.
nagendra
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Deve
Hmm, I want to use this for an multi usable web service independent
of apache and no restrictions (or so) for the users or user scenarios
about openssl usage ...
If the caller has an certificate generated by an not-restricted
openssl using whatever he want to to ...
how can "I"=web service hand
I have found that there might be a different length computing
in zlib V1.2.3 (or may be even in 1.2.2). In my opinion the length field
set by zlib is ok. But openssl changes this length field in the
SSL_OP_TLS_BLOCK_PADDING_BUG handling => ERROR
(I traced the problem in openssl and zlib under ope
Hi,
... see below
Christiane
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kurt Roeckx via RT
>Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 10:06 PM
>To: Kämpfe, Christiane
>Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
>Subject: [openssl.org #1204]: bad record mac because of
I have used openssl in an application for the first time, so this might be
my code, but there is strong evidence that it is not. I linked Electric
Fence in my application and when I use the sha512 digest, I get a Bus Error,
when I use the md5 digest, I do not.
I am running on a sparc Ultra-2 wit
attached you can find the 'make report' output from one of my
Solaris9 maschines.
I used the SunStudio11 compiler on Solaris9 (SUN Fire V890)
Is there any fix available for this problem ?
thanks in advance !
regards,
Steffen
--
Steffen Unger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
__
OpenSSL self-test report:
OpenSSL version: 0.9.8a
Last change: Remove the functionality of
SSL_OP_MSIE_SSLV2_RSA_PADDI...
Options: --prefix=/usr/local no-asm no-gmp no-krb5 no-mdc2 no-
rc5 no-shared no-zlib no-zlib-dynamic
OS (uname): SunOS caliban 5.9 Generic_118558-21 sun4
via RT schrieb:
> Confirming identical results on Solaris 10 x86 patchlevel 118844_28,
> built with Sun C 5.8 2005/10/13.
>
> Any word or suggestions to help debug? gcc compilation does not
> exhibit this issue.
Some info follows:
- env output
_=/bin/env
MANPATH=/usr/man:/usr/local/man:/usr
via RT schrieb:
> The fix is trivial; in the solaris-x86-cc line of Configure, you must
> replace -fast -xO5 with -fast -xdepend=no (note: -xO5 was implied by
> the -fast argument.) The implicit -xdepend=yes implied by -fast was
> causing this failure.
>
> There may be further code fixes in th
Hi,
initial report at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185080
Imho it's more a OpenSSL than a OpenLDAP client problem.
Regards,
Peter
Description of problem:
During tracking down, why a LDAP enabled postfix cannot lookup via TLS
enabled
LDAP client I found that ope
Hello,
I have found a bug in libcrypto.so which causes Apache2 to crash or
deadlock when a few hundred virtual hosts are configured in a
SSL-enabled Apache2 instance.
The problem is Apache2 opens a number of files per virtual host before
initializing libcrypto.so's random seed, given enough virt
Insecure creation of shared libraries in openssl-0.9.8b.
The following problem exists for the AIX platform (and maybe others).
CC=xlc ./config --prefix=/usr/local shared
make CC=xlc
make install
creates libcrypto.so, libssl.so and engines/*.so with relative paths
(. and .. respectively) in the l
I am using Openssh 3.8.1p1 on Solaris 2.8 compiled with gcc 3.2.3. I have
nsswitch configured to use file and PADLs ldap module.
When I use nss_ldap without SSL In can login without problem, but with SSL
enabled sshd crashes. When I use openssl 0.9.8b sshd crashes in
obj_name_cmp(line
101):
Hello Steffen,
I have the same problem. Is there a solution?
Thank you in advance, Wolf-Dietrich Filss
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List opens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT schrieb:
> Hello Steffen,
> I have the same problem. Is there a solution?
> Thank you in advance, Wolf-Dietrich Filss
Hallo,
ja es gibt eine Loesung.
Schau mal zwei Betraege weiter oben, da steht:
The fix is trivial; in the solaris-x86-cc line of Configure,
201 - 300 of 344 matches
Mail list logo
