want to standardize on a limited number of supported
languages so that we can use the right tool for the right job, while
limiting the impact on infrastructure and community fragmentation. But
once a language is accepted, the more we use it the better.
++ This!
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
On 04/05/16 09:46 -0700, Clark Boylan wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2016, at 08:55 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 04/05/16 15:05 +, Amrith Kumar wrote:
>I'm emailing the ML on the subject of a review ongoing in the Trove project
regarding image building[1].
>
>TL;DR
>
>One
git/openstack/trove-integration/tree/scripts/files/trove-guest.upstart.conf
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-d
familiar with it.
Thanks for clarifying, Nikhil!
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-d
with what you've
said in the last point but review wise, I'm worried this would implicitly bring
back some kind of fast track model.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_
tributing to it, which is
great. What kind of guidance are you guys looking for?
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questio
ed to having a task engine and not a
public task API as you know it today. The task engine would be used internally
in Glance/Glare. It actually exists already.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
gt;>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-
>>>> requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
t fits my vision of the new event, which is less focused on big
glitzy events and more on small socializing opportunities.
++
to all the above! I just wanted to agree with this and I don't have much else to
add.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signatu
27;s goal (as also mentioned by Kevin in another email) is
similar to what Trove and Sahara do. I do not believe it should be opinionated.
It solves a different set of issues and it sits in the provisioning plane next
to other services akin.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-d
ction on the work. (Guessing that was the reason to delay
glanceclient work before)
I'm happy to see this moving forward. TBH, anything that would let glance (and
Nova) move on from Glance's v1 is fine.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_
he exercise was, and if any lesson is
immediately applicable. It doesn't have to be Zing-moderated or
in-training, could be more of a small post-event open brainstorming
for those who would still be around.
This sounds reasonable to me! Would be happy to join such session.
Flavio
--
@fla
or usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lis
penStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
Hey,
Yes, we can use my bridge. I'll send an invite soon and open it.
Cheers,
Flavio
>
> On 4/1/16 8:56 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> > On 31/03/16 17:34 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >&
ck-stable-maint
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
D
On 06/04/16 15:54 +, Hongbin Lu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com]
Sent: April-06-16 9:14 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Containers lifecycle management
Greetings,
I'm fairly new to Magnum
an Dague
http://dague.net
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavi
ething wrong,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subj
ubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Thanks,
Nikhil
______
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http:
ch in and help with making
this list shorter.
++
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev
ifying, Mike!
Flavio
Best regards,
Mikhail Fedosin
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
I missed yday's Glance meeting but I went ahead and read the logs. While I
was
at it, I read a sentence from Erno (under the Glare updates topic) that
caught
On 01/04/16 10:10 -0700, Christopher Aedo wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
I missed yday's Glance meeting but I went ahead and read the logs. While I
was
at it, I read a sentence from Erno (under the Glare updates topic) that
caught
my eye:
able to actually try to build on top of the current API.
Hope the above makes sense,
Flavio
[0]
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/defcore/2016/defcore.2016-03-30-16.00.log.txt
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/283136
--
@flaper87
Fl
e. It work fairly well for the virtual mid-cycle we
did a couple of months ago.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubs
e to represent you. I look forward to
another year of successes reached by the Openstack community.
[0] Project Team Guide: http://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/
[1] TC Communications Workgroup:
http://www.openstack.org/blog/category/technical-committee-updates/
Flavio
--
@flaper
On 24/03/16 14:28 +, Amrith Kumar wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 9:13 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Bots and Their Effects: Gerrit, IRC, other
____________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Pe
ot for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 22/03/16 17:20 -0400, Adam Young wrote:
On 03/22/2016 09:15 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 21/03/16 21:43 -0400, Adam Young wrote:
I had a good discussion with the Nova folks in IRC today.
My goal was to understand what could talk to what, and the short
according to
.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP
velopment Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
an impact on the performance when running under huge loads given
the fact that the data will be partitioned differently and, therefore,
written/read differently. I don't have good data at hand about this, sorry.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signatu
t
job there (as expected) and is very active, which is again much
appreciated.
Please respond with ack/nack.
+1
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Ma
new very terrible interface.
We're not sure why.
If you haven't tried gertty yet, I highly recommend it.
gertty FTW!
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
Ope
AFAIK, not released yet that adds
"hashtags" to gerrit. Basically the ability to add tags to reviews and search
them.
I'm not a huge fan of the starring option but I can see how that could work for
other folks. One thing in favor of starring patches is that it's persistent
across PS
mit-planning
[0]
http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/glance-specs/priorities/mitaka-priorities.html
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (no
r a single patch.
Thanks again and I wish you the best of lucks on your new tasks.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
U
d Hat, Inc.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flav
=(from%7Cimport).*httplib2&i=nope&files=&repos=
For prettytable we decided to use jazzband[0] instead of adopting it in
OpenStack. I believe it would be a good home for httplib2 as well.
[0] https://jazzband.co/
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: P
n the gate to using httpd.
This is to say, I agree with Chris's and Sean's statements.
Also, as already stated sort of vaguely earlier in the thread, isn't
it the case that if you aren't using the service catalog to find an
endpoint, you're doing it wrong?
++
F
ge questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
Open
These 2 look good!
Thanks, Doug!
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.ope
On 24/02/16 11:42 -0400, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Hey Folks,
It's that time of the year. We need to choose what our needs with regards to
slots and sessions are for the next summit.
We can choose among 3 different types of sessions:
* Fishbowl slots (Wed-Thu)
Our traditional largish
ed with the vulnerability team on
security issues, etc. Thanks to all of them for their immense help and I do hope
you'll keep up at what you're doing :). In other words, burnout is real and you
gotta take care of yourself too. Work with the community, there's no need to
ta
nding that current TC members will be invited as well as those elected
to the TC In April. I'll be checking in on preferred dates with everyone in the
next few days.
Thanks everyone, for all of the feedback and interest!
Sounds awesome!
Thanks a lot for the effort you've put
much other benefits over just running testr directly (which I
sometimes do).
Hope that's clearer,
Flavio
On 3/4/16 12:41 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 04/03/16 11:59 -0500, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
I think the hard question to me here is:
Do people care about testing code on system installs
focused on packstack
anymore and I'd be of more help as a user than as a reviewer.
It was a pleasure to contribute to the project.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Deve
shouldn't assume things. So, I'd advice a proper fix that is also backwards
compatible.
*cough* Doing a change on the API and then a revert feels like releasing on pypi
and then deleting the release. *cough*
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: P
7;re still
finding a few spots in our docs that need updating, but overall it was
an easy transition.
[0]
https://github.com/openstack/keystone/commit/55e9514cbd4e712e2c317335294355cf1596d870
stevemar
Inactive hide details for Flavio Percoco ---2016/03/04 06:51:47
AM---Hey Folks, I'm looking
as the
config regen.
Absolutely!
As part of this change we'll be documenting the testing tools and
recommendations for Glance.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack
Something I'm missing?
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@list
stack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-re
r.com/dims
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flav
k-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
ent Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
_
ation elsewhere. For everyone else, there are release
>>> notes
>>> that should be informative enough and contain relevant information for
>>> their deployments, upgrades, security, etc.
>>
>>
>> Yes, that.
>
>
> On the note of 'known your aud
l to have the events be
>> back-to-back across a weekend may indeed address some of these concerns,
>> at the cost of the "less expensive city and venue" part of the proposal,
>> and at the cost of being away from my family over yet another weekend.
>
> Back to ba
etc.
Flavio
>
> >
> > -- Brant
>
> >
> __
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://l
completed. The hold up at the
> moment is whether the property names should be CamelCased or simply
> lowercased. My opinion is that if everyone's going to make all property
> names lowercase just to be safe, then we ought to go ahead and enforce
> this in the Images API, that is, m
utors to Glance or at all (in case they want to attend other
> meetup). Also, asking for 8 (or more than 6) would be ill effect against
> being good openstack citizens.
>
>
> On 2/24/16 12:25 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Nikhil Komawar
avio
>
> On 2/24/16 10:42 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>
> Hey Folks,
>
> It's that time of the year. We need to choose what our needs with regards
> to slots and sessions are for the next summit.
>
> We can choose among 3 different types of sessions:
>
> * Fishbow
I'd recommend we keep it that way. Thoughts?
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubs
l of the diverse needs we have.
>
> Thank you very much!
>
+1
I don't have much to say as my questions have been asked and answered
already (co-loation, regional events, etc etc). I believe the proposal is
great and I'd love to see it happening.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Perc
k every contributor needs to be present at every OpenStack Summit,
>> while I'd like to see most of them present at every separated
>> contributors-oriented event[tm].
>>
>
> Yes. This. A thousand this.
Fully agreed here!
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
_
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bi
bscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
ht
ks Mikhail for all the effort put on this and
those sleepless nights he spent on making the xenplugin work with v2. This was
not an easy task to take on and Mikhail succeeded on reaching the goal.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
witter.com/dims
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description
On 11/02/16 17:31 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 02/08/2016 09:54 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Would our votes change if Poppy had support for OpenCDN (imagine it's being
maintained) even if that solution is terrible?
Let's say it was doing that, and spawning instances containi
ented in a way that any real solution can be
addressed in most cases. Tests without a path forward, that are failing
good patches a lot, are very much the kind of thing we should remove
from the system.
no objections here!
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On 08/02/16 10:52 -0800, Mike Perez wrote:
On 13:56 Feb 08, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 08/02/16 09:24 -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
>On 02/08/2016 08:54 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>
>>Would our votes change if Poppy had support for OpenCDN (imagine it's being
>>maintained) e
On 08/02/16 09:24 -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
On 02/08/2016 08:54 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Would our votes change if Poppy had support for OpenCDN (imagine it's being
maintained) even if that solution is terrible?
I guess my question is: When do we start considering a project to be
safe fr
view accordingly.
Best,
-jay
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.
sn't work well on OpenJDK
at all, which makes it non-free as it requires a Java interpreter which
is non-free itself). If I had to upload Poppy to Debian, it would be
uploaded to contrib (which is the area where free software requiring
non-free software to run or be built are uploaded).
ut I think we'll figure
this out on the go. We could probably just add 1h to Friday.
Cheers,
Flavio
On 2/2/16 12:07 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 29/01/16 09:33 -0430, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
As promissed (although I promissed it yday), here's the link to
On 26/01/16 10:11 -0430, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
I'd like us to have one more core cleanup for this cycle:
Additions:
- Kairat Kushaev
- Brian Rosmaita
Both have done amazing reviews either on specs or code and I think they both
would be an awesome addition to the Glance
nt to vote on the review.
The proposal is to have the weekly 30 mins meetings on
#openstack-meeting-alt on Mondays at 1730 UTC starting next week (i.e.
Feb 8th)
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/274806/
+1 :D
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP sign
On 29/01/16 09:33 -0430, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
As promissed (although I promissed it yday), here's the link to vote for the
days you'd like the Glance Virtual Midcycle to happen. We'll be meeting just for
2 days and at maximum for 3 hours. The 2 days with more votes ar
stack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> So people are made core and then expected to become experts on the other
> projects? I get that is a carrot, but it seems like that could put the stick
>
's such a short notice, I'll be actively pinging you
all and I'll close the vote on Monday Feb 1st.
http://doodle.com/poll/eck5hr5d746fdxh6
Thank you all for jumping in with such a short notice,
Flavio
P.S: I'll be sending the details of the meeting out with the invit
Somerville
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flav
-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
ompetition and I'm
sure both teams will find a way to make this work.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe
On 27/01/16 08:20 -0430, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 26/01/16 09:11 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 12:00:16AM +0200, Duncan Thomas wrote:
I guess my wisdom would be 'why'? What does this enable you to do that you
couldn't do with similar ease with the form
nstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questio
On 27/01/16 11:00 +, Kuvaja, Erno wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 3:07 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Stabilization cycles: Elaborating on the
idea to move it
n keeping you in the team. You've done awesome stuff for Glance and we've all
had ups and downs time-wise. I'm glad you sent this email and I look forward to
see more stuff from you.
(Fastest re-addition ever)
Flavio
On 27/01/16 03:41, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
I'd l
On 21/01/16 12:10 -0430, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 20/01/16 13:16 -0430, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Yo! Glancers,
Gonna cut the chase: I think we would do a better job on the specs (and light
specs) side if we get rid of the Glance Drivers team and encourage everyone
(especially from the core team
the above will be effective next Tuesday.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: ope
presumably able to deal with it since they're asking for it.
Yeah, this could work as well. It'd be weird to have it been both but I guess
that's fine from a metadata perspective.
An image's container and disk format shou
On 25/01/16 18:19 +0100, Ghe Rivero wrote:
Quoting Flavio Percoco (2016-01-25 16:06:36)
On 20/01/16 13:23 -0430, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>Thoughts? Feedback?
Hey Folks,
Thanks a lot for the feedback. Great comments and proposals in the many replies.
I've gone through the whole th
x27;s interested, and
if she could commit to doing some reviews in oslo outside of pbr
itself - which she has said she is and can.
No objections, super excited to have Sachi on board! +1
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
On 20/01/16 13:23 -0430, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Thoughts? Feedback?
Hey Folks,
Thanks a lot for the feedback. Great comments and proposals in the many replies.
I've gone through the whole thread and collected the most common feedback.
Here's the summary:
- The general idea of pla
On 20/01/16 13:16 -0430, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Yo! Glancers,
Gonna cut the chase: I think we would do a better job on the specs (and light
specs) side if we get rid of the Glance Drivers team and encourage everyone
(especially from the core team) to weight in.
Thoughts? Critics? Improvements
s to send along, I
just decided to record a quick video and post to youtube. Its nothing fancy
since I only had time to do 1 take, but here you go:
https://youtu.be/zJpHXdBOoeM
Hey Travis,
This is awesome! Thanks a bunch for taking the time!
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature
On 21/01/16 16:50 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 21/01/16 11:55 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
As you said, projects can already decide to restrict feature
development in a given cycle, so this is nothing new. We only need to
communicate more aggressively that it is
On 21/01/16 12:00 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20 2016, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Hi fellows,
Now, "stabilization Cycles" are easy to dream about but really hard to do and
enforce. Nonetheless, they are still worth a try or, at the very least, a
thought. I'll try to go
301 - 400 of 1147 matches
Mail list logo
