[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Author tags

Hi, A few cycles ago the Nova group decided to remove @author from copyright statements. This is due to the fact that this information is stored in git. After adding a similar hacking rule to Neutron it has stirred up some debate. Does anyone have any reason to for us not to go ahead with https:

[openstack-dev] [Nova][VMware] Minesweeper status

Hi, Minesweeper is back up and running - this is now called "Vmware NSX CI". A patch for the deprecation of the ESX driver resulted in endless Minesweeper failures (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/108854/). These were resolved by a number of patches, the last being https://review.openstack.org/#

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

From: Joe Gordon mailto:joe.gord...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Monday, August 18, 2014 at 9:31 PM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

[openstack-dev] [All] LOG.warning/LOG.warn

Hi, Over the last few weeks I have seen a number of patches where LOG.warn is replacing LOG.warning. I think that if we do something it should be the opposite as warning is the documented one in python 2 and 3 https://docs.python.org/3/howto/logging.html. Any thoughts? Thanks Gary __

Re: [openstack-dev] Enabling silent Docker tests for Nova?

+1 From: Eric Windisch mailto:ewindi...@docker.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Friday, August 15, 2014 at 9:45 PM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: [openstack-dev] Enabling silent Docker tests for Nova? I have

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Rotating the weekly Neutron meeting

Huge +1 On 8/13/14, 5:19 PM, "Paul Michali (pcm)" wrote: >+1 > >PCM (Paul Michali) > >MAIL Š..Š. p...@cisco.com >IRC ŠŠ..Š pcm_ (irc.freenode.com) >TW ŠŠŠ... @pmichali >GPG Key Š 4525ECC253E31A83 >Fingerprint .. 307A 96BB 1A4C D2C7 931D 8D2D 4525 ECC2 53E3 1A83 > > > >On Aug 13, 2014, at 10:05 A

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] PCI support

sense? Thanks Gary From: Irena Berezovsky mailto:ire...@mellanox.com>> Date: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 at 9:01 AM To: Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>>, OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [Nova] PCI support Hi Gary,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] PCI support

uesday, August 12, 2014 at 10:25 AM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Cc: Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [Nova] PCI support Hi Gary, Mellanox already established CI support on Mellanox SR-IOV NICs, as one of the jobs of

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack][InstanceGroup] metadetails and metadata in instance_group.py

On 8/11/14, 6:06 PM, "Dan Smith" wrote: >> As the person who -2'd the review, I'm thankful you raised this issue on >> the ML, Jay. Much appreciated. > >The "metadetails" term isn't being invented in this patch, of course. I >originally complained about the difference when this was being added:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] PCI support

tack-dev] [Nova] PCI support Gary, Cisco is adding it in our CI testbed. I guess that mlnx is doing the same for their MD as well. -Robert On 8/11/14, 9:05 AM, "Gary Kotton" mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> wrote: Hi, At the moment all of the drivers are required CI support. Are t

[openstack-dev] [Nova] PCI support

Hi, At the moment all of the drivers are required CI support. Are there any plans regarding the PIC support. I understand that this is something that requires specific hardware. Are there any plans to add this? Thanks Gary ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] fair standards for all hypervisor drivers

In the past there was smokestack that used a fedora version of libvirt. Any idea what happened to that? On 8/11/14, 12:53 PM, "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote: >On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 09:06:29AM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote: >> On 08/07/2014 08:06 PM, Michael Still wrote: >> > It seems to me that the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Improvements to current reviews

Hi, I took a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105331/ and had one minor issue which I think can be addressed. Prior to approving we need to understand what the state of the V2 API will be. Thanks Gary From: Vijay Venkatachalam mailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Core team proposals

+1 From: chandankumar mailto:chandankumar.093...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Friday, August 8, 2014 at 2:14 PM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Core team proposals On

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Manage multiple clusters using a single nova service

Hi, Sorry for taking such long time to chime in but these mails were sadly missed. Please see my inline comments below. My original concerns for the revert of the service were as follows: 1. What do we do about existing installation. This support was added at the end of Havana and it is in produc

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Group Based Policy and the way forward

Policy and the way forward On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> wrote: From: Aaron Rosen mailto:aaronoro...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 at 10:09 AM To:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Group Based Policy and the way forward

Policy and the way forward On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> wrote: On 8/5/14, 8:53 PM, "Russell Bryant" mailto:rbry...@redhat.com>> wrote: >On 08/05/2014 01:23 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: >> Ok, thanks for the clarification. Thi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Group Based Policy and the way forward

Correct, this work is orthogonal to the parity work, which I understand is coming along very nicely. Do new features in Nova also require parity - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/better-support-for-multiple-networks (for example enables the MTU to be configured instead of via a confi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Group Based Policy and the way forward

On 8/5/14, 8:53 PM, "Russell Bryant" wrote: >On 08/05/2014 01:23 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: >> Ok, thanks for the clarification. This means that it will not be done >> automagically as it is today ­ the tenant will need to create a Neutron >> port and then pass th

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Group Based Policy and the way forward

ck-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2014 at 8:13 PM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Group Based Policy and the way forward On 8/5/14, 11:04 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, Is there any description of how this w

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Group Based Policy and the way forward

Hi, Is there any description of how this will be consumed by Nova. My concern is this code landing there. Thanks Gary From: Robert Kukura mailto:kuk...@noironetworks.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2014 at 5:20 PM To: OpenStack L

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Status of A/A HA for neutron-metadata-agent?

On 8/4/14, 5:39 PM, "mar...@redhat.com" wrote: >On 03/08/14 13:07, Gary Kotton wrote: >> Hi, >> Happy you asked about this. This is an idea that we have: >> >> Below is a suggestion on how we can improve the metadata service. This >>can >> be d

[openstack-dev] [Nova] VMware update

Hi, A few updates regarding the driver: 1. Spawn refactor. This is coming along very nicely. It would be great if the following patches can get some TLC (this will enable us to start working on the next phases - finish spawn treatment and upgrading code to work with oslo.vmware): * ht

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Status of A/A HA for neutron-metadata-agent?

/14, 1:07 PM, "Gary Kotton" wrote: >Hi, >Happy you asked about this. This is an idea that we have: > >Below is a suggestion on how we can improve the metadata service. This can >be done by leveraging the a Load balancers supports X-Forwarded-For.The >following link has

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Status of A/A HA for neutron-metadata-agent?

Hi, Happy you asked about this. This is an idea that we have: Below is a suggestion on how we can improve the metadata service. This can be done by leveraging the a Load balancers supports X-Forwarded-For.The following link has two diagrams. The first is the existing support (may be a little rusty

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Nominating Jay Pipes for nova-core

+1 On 8/1/14, 7:15 PM, "Mitsuhiro Tanino" wrote: >+1 > >Regards, >Mitsuhiro Tanino > HITACHI DATA SYSTEMS > c/o Red Hat, 314 Littleton Road, Westford, MA 01886 > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com] >> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 7:58 AM

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] stable branches & failure to handle review backlog

On 7/30/14, 8:22 PM, "Kevin L. Mitchell" wrote: >On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 09:01 +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote: >> As a stable-maint, I'm always hesitant to review patches I've no >> understanding on, hence I end up just checking how big is the patch, >> whether it adds/removes new configuration opti

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] objects notifications

On 7/30/14, 7:26 AM, "Dan Smith" wrote: >> When reviewing https://review.openstack.org/#/c/107954/ it occurred to >> me that maybe we should consider having some kind of generic object >> wrapper that could do notifications for objects. Any thoughts on this? > >I think it might be good to do th

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] how to deprecate a plugin

In Nova we have done the following: - add a warning in the current version that this will be deprecated in K - start of K drop the code It is also important to have an upgrade path. What happens if I have my RYU plugin in production and I upgrade to the next version. That should be clearly document

Re: [openstack-dev] [NFV] Meeting summary 2014-07-30

Hi, There are a few other issues which may be related: - https://review.openstack.org/103091 - https://review.openstack.org/103094 They are both related to the attachment of new interfaces to a VM Thanks Gary On 7/30/14, 9:38 PM, "Steve Gordon" wrote: >Meeting summary > >https://etherpad

[openstack-dev] [nova] objects notifications

Hi, When reviewing https://review.openstack.org/#/c/107954/ it occurred to me that maybe we should consider having some kind of generic object wrapper that could do notifications for objects. Any thoughts on this? Thanks Gary ___ OpenStack-dev mailing l

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] [Spec freeze exception] VMware DVS support

Hi, I would like to propose the following for spec freeze exception: * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105369 This is an umbrella spec for a number of VMware DVS support specs. Each has its own unique use case and will enable a lot of existing VMware DVS users to start to use OpenStack. F

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][glance] Allow Nova to use either Glance V1 or V2: Call for reviews to get the spec merged

+1 From: Arnaud Legendre mailto:alegen...@vmware.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Friday, July 18, 2014 at 12:52 AM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova][glance] Allow Nova to use either Glanc

[openstack-dev] [oslo.vmware] Updates

Hi, I just thought it would be nice to give the community a little update about the current situation: 1. Version is 0.4 (https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/master/global-requirements.txt#L58) * This is used by glance and ceilometer * There is a patch in review for N

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] VMware networking

Hi, I am sorry but I had to attend a meeting now. Can we please postpone this to tomorrow? Thanks Gary On 7/8/14, 11:19 AM, "Gary Kotton" wrote: >Hi, > >Just an update and a progress report: > >1. Armando has created an umbrella BP - > >https://revie

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][vmware] Convert to rescue by adding the rescue image and booting from it

Nice idea. I say Œship it¹ The code was legacy and we just made sure it worked. Nice proposal On 7/10/14, 6:52 PM, "Matthew Booth" wrote: >Currently we create a rescue instance by creating a new VM with the >original instance's image, then adding the original instance's first >disk to it, and bo

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Instances randomly failing rebuild on ssh-key errors for non-migration resize - new blueprint

Hi, Please note that you will need to draft a nova spec for the BP. Thanks Gary On 7/8/14, 11:38 AM, "Dafna Ron" wrote: >Hi, > >Bug >https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova >/%2Bbug/1323578&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw%3D%3D%0A&r=eH0pxTUZo8NPZyF6hgoM >Qu%2BfDtys

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] VMware networking

/document/d/1vkfJLZjIetPmGQ6GMJydDh8SSWz60iUhuuKhYMJ qoz8/edit?usp=sharing Lets meet again next week Monday at the same time and same place and plan future steps. How does that sound? Thanks Gary On 7/2/14, 2:27 PM, "Gary Kotton" wrote: >Hi, >Sadly last night night we did not have enoug

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] VMware networking

AM, Armando M. wrote: >> Hi Gary, >> >> Thanks for sending this out, comments inline. >> >Indeed, thanks Gary! > >> On 29 June 2014 00:15, Gary Kotton wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> At the moment there are a number of different BP¹s that a

[openstack-dev] [Nova} NFV patches

Hi, There are some patches that are relevant to the NFV support. There are as follows: 1. Current exception handling for interface attachment is broken - https://review.openstack.org/103091 2. The V2 port attach is a blocking call. This cannot be changed so a proposal to have the V3 as no

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Turbo hipster

BIlLLqw%3D%3D%0A&r=eH0pxTUZo8NPZyF6hgoMQu%2BfDtysg45MkPhCZFxPEq8%3D%0A&m=RJuFlqY3B%2Feoge51zD7bpiFA3kV56%2BHZ%2FbroCaFAdTk%3D%0A&s=4beefa50e4c44dc8ebd748c9198475935b4104c4080e6e41bcb969bd84bf6175> Cheers, Josh Rackspace Australia On 6/29/14 5:48 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, This

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Turbo hipster

Hi, This appears to be broken over the last 24 hours. Thanks Gary ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] VMware networking

Hi, At the moment there are a number of different BP's that are proposed to enable different VMware network management solutions. The following specs are in review: 1. VMware NSX-vSphere plugin: https://review.openstack.org/102720 2. Neutron mechanism driver for VMWare vCenter DVS network

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][vmware] Future of Vim and PBM in Nova: summary of IRC discussion

Hi, Thanks for the updated mail. I have a number of comments: 1. I agree with the proposed changes regarding the SPBM. I think that the proposal and changes put forward by Radoslav are great. 2. It would be nice to see the integration of the oslo.vmware code. This is pending the spawn rewrite, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Oslo.cfg] Configuration string substitution

On 6/18/14, 4:19 PM, "Doug Hellmann" wrote: >On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 4:47 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: >> Hi, >> I have encountered a problem with string substitution with the nova >> configuration file. The motivation was to move all of the glance >>se

[openstack-dev] [Nova][Oslo.cfg] Configuration string substitution

Hi, I have encountered a problem with string substitution with the nova configuration file. The motivation was to move all of the glance settings to their own section (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/100567/). The glance_api_servers had default setting that uses the current glance_host and the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] A modest proposal to reduce reviewer load

On 6/17/14, 1:56 PM, "Duncan Thomas" wrote: >A far more effective way to reduce the load of trivial review issues >on core reviewers is for none-core reviewers to get in there first, >spot the problems and add a -1 - the trivial issues are then hopefully >fixed up before a core reviewer even lo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Starting contributing to project

Hi, I would suggest that you start from the master branch. Good luck. Thanks HGary On 6/15/14, 11:10 PM, "Sławek Kapłoński" wrote: >Hello, > >I want to start contributing to neutron project. I found bug which I >want to try fix: >https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=https://bugs.launchpad

[openstack-dev] [Nova] VMware ESX Driver Deprecation

Hi, In the Icehouse cycle it was decided to deprecate the VMware ESX driver. The motivation for the decision was: * The driver is not validated by Minesweeper * It is not clear if there are actually any users of the driver Prior to jumping into the proposal we should take into account th

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][neutron][NFV] Mid cycle sprints

icacoes and >>>Portugal Telecom have shown interested too. >>> >>> Neutron and NFV team members, who¹s interested in meeting in Paris, or >>>if not available on the date set by eNovance in other time and place? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Carlo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Nominating Ken'ichi Ohmichi for nova-core

+1 On 6/15/14, 6:15 AM, "Chris Behrens" wrote: >+1 > >> On Jun 13, 2014, at 3:40 PM, Michael Still wrote: >> >> Greetings, >> >> I would like to nominate Ken'ichi Ohmichi for the nova-core team. >> >> Ken'ichi has been involved with nova for a long time now. His reviews >> on API changes ar

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do any hyperviors allow disk reduction as part of resize ?

I think that is a very good point. This should maybe be addressed in the API layer as you have suggested. Thanks Gary From: , Phil Day mailto:philip@hp.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Friday, June 13, 2014 at 4:22 PM To: OpenStack List mailto:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova]{neutron] Mid cycle sprints

This part of the world == Israel (it has been a long week :)) From: administrator mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Thursday, June 12, 2014 at 4:32 PM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: [opens

[openstack-dev] [Nova]{neutron] Mid cycle sprints

Hi, There is the mid cycle sprint in July for Nova and Neutron. Anyone interested in maybe getting one together in Europe/Middle East around the same dates? If people are willing to come to this part of the world I am sure that we can organize a venue for a few days. Anyone interested. If we can

[openstack-dev] [nova] Diagnostics spec

Hi, Any chance of getting a review on https://review.openstack.org/84691. Thanks Gary ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Proposed changes to core team

+1 On 5/26/14 1:35 PM, "Akihiro Motoki" wrote: >+1 from me too. > > >Akihiro > >On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 5:59 AM, Kyle Mestery >wrote: >> I would like to propose a few changes to the Neutron core team. >> Looking at how current cores are contributing, both in terms of review >> [1] as well as pr

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Need help to start contribute to Neutron

Hi, I would suggest the following: 1. Look at the bugs and see if there is any low hanging fruit - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bugs?field.tag=low-hanging-fruit 2. Try and add some additional unit tests – pick a section of code that interests you and try and see that it has some good

[openstack-dev] [Infra] Gerrit upgrade

Hi, Thanks to all those involved. Any chance of restoring the "Diff side by side" button. The new interface may take a while to get used to. In the past there was a link to the current branch patches. That too is missing. Thanks Gary ___ OpenStack-dev m

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron BP review process for Juno

+1 On 4/16/14 1:35 AM, "Carl Baldwin" wrote: >+1. I think we'll like this process better. I hope to have some of >the first blueprints to propose to the new repository very soon. > >On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Kyle Mestery >wrote: >> Given the success the Nova team has had in handling

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron Mid-Cycle Meeting

Hi, Any chance of doing this in Europe? Thanks Gary On 4/16/14 4:54 AM, "Kyle Mestery" wrote: >Folks: > >Given all the talk of mid-cycle meetings, I'd like to propose that we >do one for Neutron as well. Mark and I talked about this over the past >few months, and I've mentioned this to a few oth

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] An analysis of code review in Nova

Regarding the spawn there are a number of patches up for review at the moment - they are all mutually exclusive and hopefully will make the process a lot smoother. https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/vmware-spawn-refactor,n,z In addition to this we have a patch up for review with the OSLO int

[openstack-dev] [Nova client] gate-python-novaclient-pypy

Hi, The client gate seems to be broken with the following error: 2014-03-10 08:19:39.566 | Running setup.py install for python-mimeparse 2014-03-10 08:19:39.567

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][vmware] Locking: A can of worms

Hi, I have provided a solution for the single node setup that. That is, we make use of the nova lock utilities to provide locking so that that the cached images will not be removed whilst an instance is spawned. I hope that this will unblock the feature an enable us to continue with the FFE. The re

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Tox issues on a clean environment

Hi, Anyone know how I cam solve the error below: Running setup.py install for jsonpatch /usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/dist.py:267: UserWarning: Unknown distribution option: 'entry_poimts' warnings.warn(msg) changing mode of build/scripts-2.7/jsondiff from 664 to 775 changing mo

[openstack-dev] [Nova] FFE Request: ISO support for the VMware driver

Hi, Unfortunately we did not get the ISO support approved by the deadline. If possible can we please get the FFE. The feature is completed and has been tested extensively internally. The feature is very low risk and has huge value for users. In short a user is able to upload a iso to glance the

Re: [openstack-dev] What's the name of IRC channel for novaclient?

Hi, This is the same channel as nova – that is #openstack-nova Thanks Gary From: wu jiang mailto:win...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Monday, March 3, 2014 10:11 AM To: OpenStack Development Ma

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][VMWare] VMware VM snapshot

Hi, This is something that would be nice to add as an extension. At the moment it is not part of our near term development plans. It would be nice to engage the community to discuss and see how this can be exposed correctly using the Nova API's. It may be something worthwhile discussing at the u

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Fixed recent gate issues

On 2/19/14 10:31 PM, "Alan Pevec" wrote: >> Yeah it's pip weirdness where things falls apart because of version >>cap. It's >> basically installing bin/swift from 1.9 when it sees the version >>requirement >> but it leaves everything in python-swiftclient namespace from master. >> >> So I've ac

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt] Is there anything blocking the libvirt driver from implementing the host_maintenance_mode API?

Hi, Plesae note that regarding the Vmware driver the maintenance mode only works with the ESX driver and not the VC driver. For the VC driver there is a patch in review - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/72143/ Thanks Gary From: Jay Lau mailto:jay.lau@gmail.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Develop

Re: [openstack-dev] call for help with nova bug management

I will help out. Thanks Gary From: Tracy Jones mailto:tjo...@vmware.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 9:48 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck

=Nf6%2FyHMSSchQO59xIcg6NKX1O2wlkkHHd42bYQim0k0%3D%0A& >s=8fc4d7e6970936977dc85989e4e7e9429afb15f5091a768efa4ce236417d9c9b > >Note that core team can trigger gate jobs by re-approving the patch. > >Thanks, >Akihiro > >(2014/02/17 22:03), Gary Kotton wrote: >> Hi, >> The "reverify no bug&qu

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck

ack-dev/2013-December/021649.html&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw%3D%3D%0A&r=eH0pxTUZo8NPZyF6hgoMQu%2BfDtysg45MkPhCZFxPEq8%3D%0A&m=B8yQ75uRFa7dyD%2FbgPgO%2FMT2x229MkK1vHWBVAzpFtM%3D%0A&s=d9cbcbde99b7c88c15ca138499de8f36edd4247ce351e41b241d675b09b79956> -Sylvain 2014-02-17 13:00 GMT+01:00 Gary Kotton

[openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck

Hi, It seems that the command 'reverify bug ' is not working. Anyone else experienced this lately. Thanks Gary ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][VMWare] VMwareVCDriver related to resize/cold migration

Hi, There are two issues here. The first is a bug fix that is in review: - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/69209/ (this is where they have the same configuration) The second is WIP: - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/69262/ (we need to restore) Thanks Gary From: Jay Lau mailto:jay.lau@gmail.

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack][Nova][VCDriver] VMWare VCDriver problems

ondition of between ESX servers in one cluster. 2014-02-13 16:47 GMT+08:00 Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>>: Hi, The commit https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/c4bf32c03283cbedade9ab8ca99e5b13b9b86ccb<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=https://github.com/openstack/nova/co

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack][Nova][VCDriver] VMWare VCDriver problems

Hi, The commit https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/c4bf32c03283cbedade9ab8ca99e5b13b9b86ccb added a warning that the ESX driver is not tested. My understanding is that there are a number of people using the ESX driver so it should not be deprecated. In order to get the warning removed we w

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Nominate Oleg Bondarev for Core

+1 On 2/11/14 1:28 AM, "Mark McClain" wrote: >All- > >I¹d like to nominate Oleg Bondarev to become a Neutron core reviewer. >Oleg has been valuable contributor to Neutron by actively reviewing, >working on bugs, and contributing code. > >Neutron cores please reply back with +1/0/-1 votes. > >ma

Re: [openstack-dev] [gantt] Scheduler sub-group meeting 2/11 - Cancel this week

Hi, I saw that one of the days there will be talk about Gantt. Would it be possible that people not at the local meet up can join this discussion? Thanks Gary From: , Donald D mailto:donald.d.dug...@intel.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:open

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Gate broken

st (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Gate broken On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> wrote: Hi, Anyone aware of: It is caused the new boto 2.25 release. Joe Gordon filed a new bug

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Gate broken

Hi, Anyone aware of: 2014-02-08 06:49:42.022 | ${PYTHON:-python} -m subunit.run discover -t ./ ./nova/tests --load-list /tmp/tmp.aaa9SCw11a/tmpuyhFPj 2014-02-08 06:49:42.022

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][vmware] A new VMwareAPISession

On 2/6/14 1:58 PM, "Matthew Booth" wrote: >On 06/02/14 11:24, Gary Kotton wrote: >> Hi, >> Thanks for the detailed mail. For the first step of moving the code into >> OSLO we are trying to be as conservative as possible (similar to the >>fork >> l

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][vmware] A new VMwareAPISession

Hi, Thanks for the detailed mail. For the first step of moving the code into OSLO we are trying to be as conservative as possible (similar to the fork lift of the scheduler code). That is, we are taking working code and moving it to the common library, not doing any rewrites and using the same func

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Image caching aging

Hi, It has come to my attention that this blueprint (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/vmware-image-cache-management) has been deferred to the next milestone series. The blueprint ensures that the driver has aging for cached images. This is a critical issue for the driver and is impor

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] vmware minesweeper

Hi, The following patches will really help minesweeper: 1. Treat exceptions that are caused by parallel tests. This enables us to run parallel jobs (we have very promising results of running 8 parallel test jobs): https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70137/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Scheduler] Will the Scheuler use Nova Objects?

t I would like to clear up. In one scheduler/gantt meeting, Gary Kotton offered to convert the scheduler to use Nova objects. In another I heard that with the creation of Gantt, the scheduler would avoid using any Nova specific features including Nova objects. I can see that these things are evolvi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] nova-network in Icehouse and beyond

On 1/29/14 7:39 PM, "Russell Bryant" wrote: >On 01/29/2014 12:27 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:47:07AM -0500, Russell Bryant wrote: >>> Greetings, >>> >>> A while back I mentioned that we would revisit the potential >>>deprecation >>> of nova-network in Icehouse af

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Minesweeper update

Hi, At the moment we have a terribly long queue for minesweeper. We are able to reduce this considerably by running tempest tests in parallel. We have encountered 2 race conditions when we do this and it would be very helpful if we can get the following patches in – they will help with the speed

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] vmware minesweeper jobs failing?

Hi, Lats week there were some infra problems. These have been addressed and minesweeper is back in action. Thanks Gary On 1/25/14 4:58 PM, "Matt Riedemann" wrote: >Seeing a few patches where vmware minesweeper is saying the build >failed, but looks like an infra issue? An example: > >https://url

Re: [openstack-dev] [gantt] Scheduler sub-group meeting agenda 1/28

Hi, Just an update regarding the instance groups: 1. The API has been posted - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/62557/ 2. The CLI has been posted - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/32904/ Thanks Gary On 1/28/14 12:45 PM, "Khanh-Toan Tran" wrote: >Dear all, > >If we have time, I would like to d

[openstack-dev] [nova] Gate issues

Hi, 1 in 3 failures today are due to: 2014-01-23 11:54:03.879 | 2014-01-23 11:54:03.880

[openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron][Temptest] Gating failures

Hi, I was looking into SSH failures and stumbled upon the following tempest issue. The validations would not take into account the neutron agent heartbeat timeout. This would cause tests to occasionally fail. In short there was a window of at most 4 second for the test test_list_agent to run in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Vmware]Bad Performance when creating a new VM

minutes to upload to the cache. Please note that I am running on a virtual setup so thing take far longer than they would if it was bare metal Best Regards -- Ray On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Gary Kotton mailto:gkot...@vmware.com>> wrote: Hi, In order for the VM to be booted the image n

[openstack-dev] [nova][turbo hipster] unable to rebase

Hi, Patch sets that are cascaded has have the following errors: "Database migration testing failed either due to migrations unable to be applied correctly or taking too long. This change was unable to be automatically merged with the current state of the repository. Please rebase your change an

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Vmware]Bad Performance when creating a new VM

Hi, In order for the VM to be booted the image needs to be on a datastore accessible by the host. By default the data tore will not have the image. This is copied from glance tot he datastore. This is most probably where the problem is. This may take a while depending on the connectivity between

[openstack-dev] [Nova] libvirt unit test errors

Hi, Anyone aware of the following: 2014-01-07 11:59:47.428 | Requirement already satisfied (use --upgrade to upgrade): markupsafe in ./.tox/py27/lib/python2.7/site-packages (from Jinja2

Re: [openstack-dev] [DevStack] Nominate Chmouel Boudjnah for core team

+1 On 1/6/14 7:55 PM, "Florent Flament" wrote: >+1 > >- Original Message - >From: "Sean Dague" >To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > >Sent: Monday, January 6, 2014 5:30:09 PM >Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [DevStack] Nominate Chmouel Boudjnah for >core tea

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Turbo-hipster

EwdZOsbG6HW%2FAwjBP1GxhEprFcAcOx%2Btg9BHc4 >Q%3D%0A&s=4a4948f494e74e51749c2d43571071cdeaaef367a00a2f5ceca2ac06d2a0e862 > > >This review also had slowness in migration 206, but has been rechecked >by the developer and now passes. It wasn't on the pe

[openstack-dev] [nova] Turbo-hipster

Hi, It seems that she/he is behaving oddly again. I have posted a patch that does not have any database changes and it has give me a –1…. Happy new year Gary ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

Hi, Following all of the discussion I have done the following: 1. Update the wiki with all of the details - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova_VM_Diagnostics 2. Renamed the BP. It is now called v3-diagnostics 3. Posted a patc

[openstack-dev] [nova] HyperV-CI

Hi, There seems to be an issue with the hyper CI. Please see - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/52687/. This code does is not related to the HyperV driver. Thanks Gary ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.opensta

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >