Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][neutron] PTG cross team session

Thanks! I wonder if 1 hour is actually enough though, given the complexity of the problem (actually three problems already proposed for discussion in the etherpad). I'd personally double it (at least). On 02/17/2017 10:16 AM, Kevin Benton wrote: Hi, I added a slot on the calendar to get a roo

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] End-of-Ocata core team updates

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi all! > > I'd like to propose a few changes based on the recent contributor activity. > > I have two candidates that look very good and pass the formal barrier of 3 > reviews a day on average [1]. > > First, Vasyl Saienko (vsaienk0). I'm

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] End-of-Ocata core team updates

+1 to both, thanks for your contributions Vasyl and Mario!!! Sam On 17/02/2017, 09:40, "Dmitry Tantsur" wrote: Hi all! I'd like to propose a few changes based on the recent contributor activity. I have two candidates that look very good and pass the formal barrier of 3

[openstack-dev] [ironic] End-of-Ocata core team updates

Hi all! I'd like to propose a few changes based on the recent contributor activity. I have two candidates that look very good and pass the formal barrier of 3 reviews a day on average [1]. First, Vasyl Saienko (vsaienk0). I'm pretty confident in him, his stats [2] are high, he's doing a lot

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][neutron] PTG cross team session

Hi, I added a slot on the calendar to get a room from 2:30-3:30PM on Tuesday in the Macon room.[1] Let me know if anyone has any conflicts with this. 1. https://ethercalc.openstack.org/Pike-PTG-Discussion-Rooms On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Vasyl Saienko wrote: > Hello Ironic/Neutron teams,

[openstack-dev] [ironic][neutron] PTG cross team session

Hello Ironic/Neutron teams, Ironic team would like to schedule cross session with Neutron team on Mon - Tues except for Tue 9.30 - 10.00 The topics we would like to talk are added to: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-ptg-pike L151 Sincerely, Vasyl Saienko ___

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

not for usage questions)" Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design Hi, Hi Ironic team, [TL;DR - we agree to Miles’ proposal for two images (one mascot, one logo) for different contexts. We’re looking for any final feedback on the stylized logo for use on the website, while

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

Hi, > Hi Ironic team, > > [TL;DR - we agree to Miles’ proposal for two images (one mascot, one logo) > for different contexts. We’re looking for any final feedback on the stylized > logo for use on the website, while the PixieBoots mascot remains yours for > swag, etc.] > > I’m doing my best to

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

Comments inline, in bold From: Heidi Joy Tretheway Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 2:25 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design Hi Ironic team, [TL;DR - we agree to Miles

[openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

Hi Ironic team, [TL;DR - we agree to Miles’ proposal for two images (one mascot, one logo) for different contexts. We’re looking for any final feedback on the stylized logo for use on the website, while the PixieBoots mascot remains yours for swag, etc.] I’m doing my best to reply to all ques

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

Hi Heidi, Thanks for the email. I don't wanna be rude but we left the last ML thread [0] with many questions without an answer. It would be good to keep the discussion in one thread only to make it easier for people to read about it in the future. I don't think we have much of a choice, so, the

[openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

Hi Ironic team, Thanks for your feedback, especially helping us to ensure that the mascot would be culturally appropriate worldwide. Our most recent offering to the team was generally liked, with a request to cut it off at the middle (head/arms/top of the stomach) per Dmitry. Note this version

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Retiring python-wsmanclient

Hi everyone! Following the discussion below, we would like to officially retire python-wsmanclient as soon as possible. We haven't maintained it for a while, it hasn't had any commits and releases since Aug 2016. On 11/07/2016 02:51 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Hi folks! In view of the Ironic

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are feverish to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) 1. Clean up relea

[openstack-dev] [ironic][ptg] Evening gathering and Attendance

Greetings everyone! We are attempting to put together a team gathering for one evening during the PTG. As such, we’ve created a doodle poll[0]. Please fill out the poll as soon as possible so we can determine the number of people who will be up for attending an evening gathering, as well as t

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][qa][grenade] Release blocked on grenade job not testing from newton

The root cause why ironic grenade job was broken is described in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/1663371 In two words, during Ocata we removed DEFAULT_IMAGE_NAME setting logic from devstack [0]. As soon stable/ocata was cut for devstack variable DEFAULT_IMAGE_NAME is not visible in grenade,

[openstack-dev] [ironic] PTG planning: please submit your topics by Friday

Hi folks! We have a bit more than a week left till the PTG, and we need to decide on the list of topics to discuss. Big thanks to everyone who already proposed their topics. Those who didn't - please do it by tomorrow, Feb 9. Add your topics to the very bottom of the etherpad: https://etherp

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][qa][grenade] Release blocked on grenade job not testing from newton

On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 7:00 AM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > Hey folks, > > Ironic plans to release Ocata this week, once we have a couple small > patches > and a release note cleanup landed. > > However, our grenade job is now testing master->master, best I can tell. > This > is pretty clearly due t

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][qa][grenade] Release blocked on grenade job not testing from newton

On 02/09/2017 08:22 AM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 7:51 AM, Sean Dague > wrote: > > On 02/09/2017 07:00 AM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > > Hey folks, > > > > Ironic plans to release Ocata this week, once we have a couple > small patches

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][qa][grenade] Release blocked on grenade job not testing from newton

On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 7:51 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 02/09/2017 07:00 AM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > > Hey folks, > > > > Ironic plans to release Ocata this week, once we have a couple small > patches > > and a release note cleanup landed. > > > > However, our grenade job is now testing master->m

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][qa][grenade] Release blocked on grenade job not testing from newton

Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2017-02-09 07:51:41 -0500: > On 02/09/2017 07:00 AM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > > Hey folks, > > > > Ironic plans to release Ocata this week, once we have a couple small patches > > and a release note cleanup landed. > > > > However, our grenade job is now test

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][qa][grenade] Release blocked on grenade job not testing from newton

On 02/09/2017 07:00 AM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > Hey folks, > > Ironic plans to release Ocata this week, once we have a couple small patches > and a release note cleanup landed. > > However, our grenade job is now testing master->master, best I can tell. > This > is pretty clearly due to this d-s

[openstack-dev] [ironic][qa][grenade] Release blocked on grenade job not testing from newton

Hey folks, Ironic plans to release Ocata this week, once we have a couple small patches and a release note cleanup landed. However, our grenade job is now testing master->master, best I can tell. This is pretty clearly due to this d-s-g commit: https://github.com/openstack-infra/devstack-gate/com

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are freewheeling to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) 1. Continue r

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

Just thinking – horns seem pretty metal, what do you think about goat-like horned bear? :) Joanna On 2/6/17, 5:26 AM, "Sam Betts (sambetts)" wrote: +100 On 06/02/2017, 12:32, "Dmitry Tantsur" wrote: On 02/06/2017 12:49 PM, Miles Gould wrote: > On 01/02/17 21:

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

+100 On 06/02/2017, 12:32, "Dmitry Tantsur" wrote: On 02/06/2017 12:49 PM, Miles Gould wrote: > On 01/02/17 21:38, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote: >> But, let me ask something, what the foundation really wants to achieve >> with this ? Cause I think we are conflating two things here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

On 02/06/2017 12:49 PM, Miles Gould wrote: On 01/02/17 21:38, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote: But, let me ask something, what the foundation really wants to achieve with this ? Cause I think we are conflating two things here: A logo (or brand) and a mascot. I think this is an excellent point. The c

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

On 01/02/17 21:38, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote: But, let me ask something, what the foundation really wants to achieve with this ? Cause I think we are conflating two things here: A logo (or brand) and a mascot. I think this is an excellent point. The constraints on logos make a lot of sense *fo

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

I'm only barely an Ironic contributor these days, but what about having the bear do David Lee Roth's famous jump? http://www.vhnd.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/kick_fb.jpg Doesn't require props, and no hand gestures. Alternatively, you could have the bear playing air guitar... if that can be ca

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

] Sent: Friday, February 03, 2017 10:30 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design On 02/02/17 16:55, Loo, Ruby wrote: > I guess a 'peace sign' wouldn't work? That also has severa

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

On 01/02/17 01:28, arkady.kanev...@dell.com wrote: I think Russian already owns the bear. AIUI, trademark law allows for use of the same mark by different entities provided they operate in different enough spheres to prevent confusion. Hence the long-running litigation between Apple Music and

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

On 02/02/17 16:55, Loo, Ruby wrote: I guess a 'peace sign' wouldn't work? That also has several meanings: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V_sign On the other hand, the palm-forward version has no offensive meanings that I can see (the offensive version is palm-backwards). I like the propose

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

Hi, > I'm with the group here. > > Let's find something that looks nice and is not offensive to anyone. > +1 ... Also, Heidi, I forgot to ask in the previous emails and I couldn't find in the guidelines[0]: What license will these images have ? Will people be allowed to share and create derivat

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

Oh... I'm with the group here. Let's find something that looks nice and is not offensive to anyone. Mathieu On 2017-02-02 11:52 AM, Jay Faulkner wrote: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_of_the_horns came up in IRC, as the sign the bear is making. Obviously to me, I read it as the heavy meta

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_of_the_horns came up in IRC, as the sign the bear is making. Obviously to me, I read it as the heavy metal gesture. Apparently it is offensive in some cultures, so I change my vote to -1, since I don’t want to offend folks in other parts of the world :). -Jay

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

I think Jay has phrased it perfectly. With the context of the earlier discussion and the rules put forth at the beginning of this logo creation effort, I feel like the 3.0 version is our only real option for an official mascot in line with our team’s spirit. +1 to version 3.0. Long live pixieb

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

Of the proposed logos, I do like the latest version the best. It appears friendly and fun. So I'm +1 on it. On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy < pshchelokovs...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Hi, > > +1 to Jay, the 3.0 version looks ok - it is friendly and rocking :) > > Cheers, > > Dr

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

Hi, +1 to Jay, the 3.0 version looks ok - it is friendly and rocking :) Cheers, Dr. Pavlo Shchelokovskyy Senior Software Engineer Mirantis Inc www.mirantis.com On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 10:38 PM, Jay Faulkner wrote: > Of the options presented, I think the new 3.0 version most brings to mind > a

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

Of the options presented, I think the new 3.0 version most brings to mind a rocking bear. It’s still tough to be OK with a new logo, given that pixie boots is beloved by our team partially because Lucas took the time to make us one — but it seems like not accepting a new logo created by the fou

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

On 1/31/2017 7:28 PM, arkady.kanev...@dell.com wrote: I think Russian already owns the bear. ^ is my favorite statement of the day. Thank you. -- Thanks, Matt Riedemann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for us

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

I prefer our current homegrown logo. I wish we could just keep using that. On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Jay Faulkner wrote: > I concur with most of the other comments on the thread. I have a strong > preference for our existing mascot, and don’t think the new one is an > improvement. > > Than

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

I concur with most of the other comments on the thread. I have a strong preference for our existing mascot, and don’t think the new one is an improvement. Thanks, Jay > On Jan 31, 2017, at 12:49 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > > Hey ironic-ers, > > The foundation has passed along a new version

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

day, January 31, 2017 at 5:13 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design I may be biased to some extent but I don't like it. The mascot doesn't seem to have any personality. It also looks od

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

See below. On 2017-02-01 2:37 AM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote: Hi all, this new logo actually reminds me of a wide-spread Russian meme Thanks for teaching us about this meme. The new logo has a striking similarity with the meme. Is it possible that it was an inside joke / reference to that

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

, January 31, 2017 2:49 PM > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design > > > > Hey ironic-ers, > > The foundation has passed along a new version of

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

I think Russian already owns the bear. From: Jim Rollenhagen [mailto:j...@jimrollenhagen.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 2:49 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design Hey ironic-ers, The foundation has passed

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

I may be biased to some extent but I don't like it. The mascot doesn't seem to have any personality. It also looks odd because he has this straight face while he's doing the sign of horns, it just doesn't work. I remember when I first saw a logo related to Ironic in that presentation that Jay and

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

aneiro de 2017 17:49:09 Subject: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design Hey ironic-ers, The foundation has passed along a new version of our mascot (attached) to us, and would like your feedback on it. They're hoping to have all mascot-related things ready in time for the PTG

[openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

Hey ironic-ers, The foundation has passed along a new version of our mascot (attached) to us, and would like your feedback on it. They're hoping to have all mascot-related things ready in time for the PTG, so please do send your thoughts quickly, if you have them. :) // jim _

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are jovial to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) 1. Continue reviewin

[openstack-dev] [ironic] [ptl] Ironic PTL Candidacy for Pike

Hi all! I am announcing my candidacy for PTL for the Ironic team for the Pike release cycle. In case you don't know me, I'm dtantsur on IRC. I started working on Ironic around late spring or summer 2014, and I'm probably best known as a founder of ironic-inspector sub-project. I work for Red Hat.

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are jittery to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) 1. nova patch for s

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic-pyhon-agent][DIB] IPA failed to start on Ubuntu because of modprobe path

Ian Wienand said on Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 02:26:36PM +1100: This should be just "/sbin"; I've proposed [1]. There may be even better ways to do this which anyone is welcome to propose :) +1 The problem with distributions not following anymore the FHS closely (and not working jointly on it to h

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic-pyhon-agent][DIB] IPA failed to start on Ubuntu because of modprobe path

On 01/21/2017 09:31 PM, Moshe Levi wrote: Added ExecStartPre=/usr/sbin/modprobe vfat to the ironic-python-agent systemd script The problem is that modprobe location in Ubuntu / sbin/modprobe (the /usr/sbin/modprobe vfat works for redhat) I have opened this bug in Launchpad > https://bugs.laun

[openstack-dev] [ironic-pyhon-agent][DIB] IPA failed to start on Ubuntu because of modprobe path

Hi, This commit https://github.com/openstack/diskimage-builder/commit/2854f4063bd2a6dcdb6fa5fab93aa56857e47b59 Added ExecStartPre=/usr/sbin/modprobe vfat to the ironic-python-agent systemd script The problem is that modprobe location in Ubuntu / sbin/modprobe (the /usr/sbin/modprobe vfat work

[openstack-dev] [ironic][ptl] PTL Candidacy for Pike

Hi all, I am thrilled to nominate myself as a candidate for ironic PTL for Pike cycle. Most of you should know me by now — I’m Jay Faulkner, aka “JayF” on freenode IRC. I have been in the tech industry for 10 years, starting as a systems administrator and working my way up the ladder. Since 2014,

[openstack-dev] [ironic][ptl] Announcing Ironic PTL candidacy for Pike

Greetings everyone! I would like to nominate myself as a candidate for ironic PTL for the Pike cycle. For those that don't know me, I'm TheJulia. I have been working in the OpenStack community since mid-2014, and ironic since early 2015. I'm likely best known for bifrost and advocating support for

[openstack-dev] [ironic] release timelines

Hi all, As you probably know, ironic is a cycle-with-intermediary project that doesn't strictly follow the OpenStack feature freeze. Ocata is finishing up and we need to define some deadlines/goals around a final release. Please refer to the schedule here: https://releases.openstack.org/ocata/sch

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [infra] Nested KVM + the gate

nStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [infra] Nested KVM + the gate On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Jay Faulkner mailto:j...@jvf.cc> > wrote: Hi all, Back in late October, Vasyl wrote support for devstack to auto detect, and when possi

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [infra] Nested KVM + the gate

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Jay Faulkner wrote: > Hi all, > > Back in late October, Vasyl wrote support for devstack to auto detect, and > when possible, use kvm to power Ironic gate jobs ( > 0036d83b330d98e64d656b156001dd2209ab1903). This has lowered some job time > when it works, but has c

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [infra] Nested KVM + the gate

Clark is right, trove does detect and try to use kvm where possible. The performance has been well worth the change (IMHO). -amrith On Jan 17, 2017 6:53 PM, "Clark Boylan" wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017, at 03:41 PM, Jay Faulkner wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Back in late October, Vasyl wrote suppo

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [infra] Nested KVM + the gate

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017, at 03:41 PM, Jay Faulkner wrote: > Hi all, > > Back in late October, Vasyl wrote support for devstack to auto detect, > and when possible, use kvm to power Ironic gate jobs > (0036d83b330d98e64d656b156001dd2209ab1903). This has lowered some job > time when it works, but has c

[openstack-dev] [ironic] [infra] Nested KVM + the gate

Hi all, Back in late October, Vasyl wrote support for devstack to auto detect, and when possible, use kvm to power Ironic gate jobs (0036d83b330d98e64d656b156001dd2209ab1903). This has lowered some job time when it works, but has caused failures — how many? It’s hard to quantify as the log mes

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are jubilant to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) 1. nova code for

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Stepping down as PTL after this cycle

te: Friday, January 6, 2017 at 2:02 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Subject: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Stepping down as PTL after this cycle Hi friends, I'll be stepping down as PTL after Ocata is done. I'll still be 100% dedicated to the proje

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Policy for deprecating metric names

Hi all, There was consensus at this week's IRC meeting that the best thing to do here is simply to require a release note when metric names change. [0] I have a patch up to add this to the existing metrics documentation, so feel free to voice any concerns there: https://review.openstack.org/41858

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] User survey question

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 8:11 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 01/04/2017 07:43 PM, Mario Villaplana wrote: > >> >> > > - What's been your most frustrating or difficult experience with ironic? >> > > I wanted to suggest this ^^^ question as well, thanks Mario. > FYI, this is the one I sent in. Tha

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are jazzy to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) 1. attach/detach: rev

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Stepping down as PTL after this cycle

Hi friends, I'll be stepping down as PTL after Ocata is done. I'll still be 100% dedicated to the project, but I'd like to be able to focus more on writing code and reinforcing the bridges between us and other projects (Nova, Neutron, etc). I'd love to see two or more people step up and run next

[openstack-dev] [ironic] PTG planning

Hey folks, The PTG is about 6 weeks from now, so I figure we should start planning. As far as how we plan this, I'm trying to treat it similar to the summit. The only difference being we get a room for three days straight instead of 40 minute blocks, so we can be flexible with our time. Anyway, h

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] User survey question

On 01/04/2017 07:43 PM, Mario Villaplana wrote: Hi, Here are some questions I've thought of: TESTING / INTERESTED - What is your use case for ironic? - What, if anything, is preventing you from using ironic in a production environment? - What alternatives to ironic have you considered? USING

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [inspector] RFC: deprecating "set IPMI credentials" feature in ironic-inspector

On 12/13/2016 01:40 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Hi folks! Since nearly its beginning, ironic-inspector has had a controversial feature: we allow a user to request changing IPMI credentials of the node after introspection. The new credentials are passed back from inspector to the ramdisk, and the r

[openstack-dev] [ironic] User survey question

Hello, I would like to use this opportunity upcoming to decide things related to one of features that I am implementing. To prevent lost-update problem, the user in the next Ironic API versions will have the ability to use the entity tag for each resource. Thus, in order to send conditional reque

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] User survey question

One thought I had. And it may not be appropriate: Do you use or have you considered using Ironic for non X86 based systems (arm, powerpc, etc)? Are you in the telecom industry? Should Ironic support ATCA based systems to make use of older hardware? I am facing a potential project in the next few

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] User survey question

Hi, Here are some questions I've thought of: TESTING / INTERESTED - What is your use case for ironic? - What, if anything, is preventing you from using ironic in a production environment? - What alternatives to ironic have you considered? USING - What new features would you like to see added t

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [nova] Ironic virt driver resources reporting

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Vladyslav Drok wrote: > Thanks all for replies! > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Jay Faulkner wrote: > >> Hey Vdrok, some comments inline. >> >> > On Dec 30, 2016, at 8:40 AM, Vladyslav Drok wrote: >> > >> > Hi all! >> > >> > There is a long standing problem o

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [nova] Ironic virt driver resources reporting

Thanks all for replies! On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Jay Faulkner wrote: > Hey Vdrok, some comments inline. > > > On Dec 30, 2016, at 8:40 AM, Vladyslav Drok wrote: > > > > Hi all! > > > > There is a long standing problem of resources reporting in ironic virt > driver. It's described in a co

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] User survey question

Hi, from my part, if it would be appropriate, I'd like to use this opportunity to estimate the iPXE adoption. So the question targeting those USING and TESTING ironic would be: - does the hardware you are managing with ironic support iPXE? - do you use ironic with iPXE enabled? ("[pxe]ipxe_enabl

[openstack-dev] [ironic] User survey question

Hey all, We have an opportunity to ask a question on the upcoming User Survey, which will launch by February 1st. We can choose the audience to direct the question to, choosing from those USING, TESTING, or INTERESTED in Ironic (or some combination of these). The hope is that the Foundation folks

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Policy for deprecating metric names

Hi all, Recently, Ruby found a patch that modifies the name of a metric emitted by ironic. [0] After some IRC discussion, we realized that there is no real deprecation policy regarding changing metric names. [1] For anyone not familiar with this feature, ironic has the capability to emit various

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [nova] Ironic virt driver resources reporting

Hey Vdrok, some comments inline. > On Dec 30, 2016, at 8:40 AM, Vladyslav Drok wrote: > > Hi all! > > There is a long standing problem of resources reporting in ironic virt > driver. It's described in a couple of bugs I've found - [0], [1]. Switching > to placement API will make things better

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [nova] Ironic virt driver resources reporting

Hi, a comment about 'report as full' vs 'remove from inventory' On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > Great questions, Vlad. Comments inline. > > On 12/30/2016 11:40 AM, Vladyslav Drok wrote: > >> Hi all! >> >> There is a long standing problem of resources reporting in ironic virt

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [nova] Ironic virt driver resources reporting

Great questions, Vlad. Comments inline. On 12/30/2016 11:40 AM, Vladyslav Drok wrote: Hi all! There is a long standing problem of resources reporting in ironic virt driver. That would be an understatement :) > It's described in a couple of bugs I've found - [0], [1]. Switching to placement

[openstack-dev] [Ironic] Meeting for today cancelled

Greetings everyone! It seems everyone is still enjoying some well deserved time off and we have an insufficient number of participants awake and active in IRC today to justify a meeting today. As such, we’ve reached the consensus in #openstack-ironic, of us who are active/awake, to cancel toda

[openstack-dev] [ironic] [nova] Ironic virt driver resources reporting

Hi all! There is a long standing problem of resources reporting in ironic virt driver. It's described in a couple of bugs I've found - [0], [1]. Switching to placement API will make things better, but still there are some problems there. For example, there are cases when ironic needs to say "this

[openstack-dev] [ironic] early prototype for HW VNC console interface

Hi all, While the work on generic graphical console [0] has somewhat stalled, I went ahead and created a prototype of graphical console interface for some specific Dell servers of interest for me (iDRAC8). This of course is too far away from any production use, but still with a couple of hacks I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] python-ironicclient weird behaviour

questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] python-ironicclient weird behaviour From: Maxime Belanger Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Thursday, December 22, 2016 at 9:32 AM To: "openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org" Subject: [op

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] python-ironicclient weird behaviour

From: Maxime Belanger Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Thursday, December 22, 2016 at 9:32 AM To: "openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org" Subject: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] python-ironicclient weird behaviour Hi Ironic folks,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Retiring ironic-webclient

Thank you Gerard! I saw the commit go through and sent you a message on IRC, but I guess you didn’t see it. :) The consensus seemed to be retire instead of move to the attic since it was never released. That being said, if you know of users using it off master that are actually finding it use

[openstack-dev] [Ironic] python-ironicclient weird behaviour

Hi Ironic folks, Yesterday I come across a weird behaviour in python-ironicclient. I discussed briefly with the problem with Julia and befor creating a bug I would like your opinion on the problem and potential fix. When doing nodes.get(resource_id=None), I get back a Node object set with at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Retiring ironic-webclient

Hi On Tuesday, December 20, 2016, Julia Kreger wrote: > As discussed at the last summit during the contributor meet-up, as well as during today’s Ironic team meeting[0], we will be retiring the ironic-webclient. > no contributions have landed in the last six months I made a small contribution

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Retiring ironic-webclient

Thanks Julia. --ruby From: Julia Kreger Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Monday, December 19, 2016 at 2:34 PM To: "openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org" Subject: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Retiring ironic-webclient As discusse

[openstack-dev] [Ironic] Retiring ironic-webclient

As discussed at the last summit during the contributor meet-up, as well as during today’s Ironic team meeting[0], we will be retiring the ironic-webclient. This is due to a number of factors, the largest being that the primary contributor has changed positions and is no longer contributing, nor

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are delighted to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) 1. attach/detach

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Rechecking, gate breakages, the whiteboard, and you

My client munged the link :(. http://bit.ly/ironic-whiteboard is a correct link. Thanks, Jay > On Dec 13, 2016, at 8:08 AM, Jay Faulkner wrote: > > Hi all, > > I’ve noticed on several patches over the last few weeks, during various gate > outages, that some folks are blindly rechecking their

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Rechecking, gate breakages, the whiteboard, and you

Hi all, I’ve noticed on several patches over the last few weeks, during various gate outages, that some folks are blindly rechecking their patches even when the gate is hard broken. Just a reminder that if you see a gate failure, and you aren’t sure it’s related to your change, to please check

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [inspector] RFC: deprecating "set IPMI credentials" feature in ironic-inspector

> On Dec 13, 2016, at 4:40 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > > Hi folks! > > Since nearly its beginning, ironic-inspector has had a controversial feature: > we allow a user to request changing IPMI credentials of the node after > introspection. The new credentials are passed back from inspector to

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [inspector] RFC: deprecating "set IPMI credentials" feature in ironic-inspector

Given that this seems to be a special case outside of what ironic-inspector normally handles, I'd be +1 to removing it. Perhaps this feature, if needed, is best implemented as a vendor passthru in ironic itself. Mario On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 7:40 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi folks! > > Since

[openstack-dev] [ironic] [inspector] RFC: deprecating "set IPMI credentials" feature in ironic-inspector

Hi folks! Since nearly its beginning, ironic-inspector has had a controversial feature: we allow a user to request changing IPMI credentials of the node after introspection. The new credentials are passed back from inspector to the ramdisk, and the ramdisk calls "ipmitool" to set them. Now I

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] iscsi-deploy vs agent-deploy comparison

Hi Pavlo, On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote: > Hi all, > > recent comments in some of my patches hinted me that I might be missing some > understanding of ironic workings, so I'd like to ask the following question: > > What features/possibilities the iscsi-deploy curren

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >