On 04/22/2017 12:02 AM, Heidi Joy Tretheway wrote:
Hello Ironic team,
Thanks for your comments on the last round. Here is the latest Pixie Boots
mascot (in every variation) ready for your downloading pleasure. We’ll also be
updating these to a public repo and to openstack.org/project-mascots, b
Thank you Heidi!
> Long live Pixie Boots!
May (s)he reign forever :D
--ruby
From: Heidi Joy Tretheway
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Date: Friday, April 21, 2017 at 6:02 PM
To: "openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org"
Subject:
Hello Ironic team,
Thanks for your comments on the last round. Here is the latest Pixie Boots
mascot (in every variation) ready for your downloading pleasure. We’ll also be
updating these to a public repo and to openstack.org/project-mascots, but
please be patient as our fab web team is slammed
Hi all,
Any updates on it ?
We would like to start using the logo, but the only version is the one from the
email bellow with a grey background. Can we expect having rest of "the branding
set" ?
Cheers,
Mateusz
> On 20 Mar 2017, at 15:47, Mario Villaplana wrote:
>
> +1, this looks like a nic
+1, this looks like a nicely stylized version of PXE Boots. Thanks!
Mario
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Jim Rollenhagen
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Heidi Joy Tretheway
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ironic team,
>> Here’s an update on your project logo. Our illustrator tried to be as tr
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Heidi Joy Tretheway <
heidi...@openstack.org> wrote:
> Hi Ironic team,
> Here’s an update on your project logo. Our illustrator tried to be as true
> as possible to your original, while ensuring it matched the line weight,
> color palette and style of the rest. Th
I love it! +1
Thank you!
-Julia
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Heidi Joy Tretheway <
heidi...@openstack.org> wrote:
> Hi Ironic team,
> Here’s an update on your project logo. Our illustrator tried to be as true
> as possible to your original, while ensuring it matched the line weight,
> colo
+1. Reminds me a lot of our current logo. I like this version the best of
the official stylized logos. Thanks.
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Heidi Joy Tretheway wrote:
> Hi Ironic team,
> Here’s an update on your project logo. Our illustrator tried to be as true
> as possible to your original
> On Mar 10, 2017, at 8:28 AM, Heidi Joy Tretheway
> wrote:
>
> Hi Ironic team,
> Here’s an update on your project logo. Our illustrator tried to be as true as
> possible to your original, while ensuring it matched the line weight, color
> palette and style of the rest. Thanks for your patie
On 03/10/2017 05:28 PM, Heidi Joy Tretheway wrote:
Hi Ironic team,
Here’s an update on your project logo. Our illustrator tried to be as true as
possible to your original, while ensuring it matched the line weight, color
palette and style of the rest. Thanks for your patience as we worked on this
Hi,
Thanks for the update Heidi. I think this version is fine so +1 from me, it
carries the essence of the original Pixie :-)
Cheers,
Lucas
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Heidi Joy Tretheway wrote:
> Hi Ironic team,
> Here’s an update on your project logo. Our illustrator tried to be as true
Hi Heidi,
imo this one is the best so far.
+1 I like it too.
Dr. Pavlo Shchelokovskyy
Senior Software Engineer
Mirantis Inc
www.mirantis.com
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Miles Gould wrote:
> On 10/03/17 16:28, Heidi Joy Tretheway wrote:
>
>> Hi Ironic team,
>> Here’s an update on your pro
On 10/03/17 16:28, Heidi Joy Tretheway wrote:
Hi Ironic team,
Here’s an update on your project logo. Our illustrator tried to be as
true as possible to your original, while ensuring it matched the line
weight, color palette and style of the rest. Thanks for your patience as
we worked on this! Fee
Hi Ironic team,
Here’s an update on your project logo. Our illustrator tried to be as true as
possible to your original, while ensuring it matched the line weight, color
palette and style of the rest. Thanks for your patience as we worked on this!
Feel free to direct feedback to me; we really w
Hi Jay & Ironic-ers,
No, that’s not out of the question at all. In fact, we already added in the
sticks as drumsticks, and on our list for revision we’re looking to take out
the leaf (to make the sticks more drumstick-like) and add back in the Kiss
makeup since many folks in your community lik
> On Feb 15, 2017, at 5:25 PM, Heidi Joy Tretheway
> wrote:
>
> Hi Ironic team,
>
> [TL;DR - we agree to Miles’ proposal for two images (one mascot, one logo)
> for different contexts. We’re looking for any final feedback on the stylized
> logo for use on the website, while the PixieBoots m
not for usage questions)"
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design
Hi,
Hi Ironic team,
[TL;DR - we agree to Miles’ proposal for two images (one mascot, one logo) for
different contexts. We’re looking for any final feedback on the stylized logo
for use on the website, while
Hi,
> Hi Ironic team,
>
> [TL;DR - we agree to Miles’ proposal for two images (one mascot, one logo)
> for different contexts. We’re looking for any final feedback on the stylized
> logo for use on the website, while the PixieBoots mascot remains yours for
> swag, etc.]
>
> I’m doing my best to
Comments inline, in bold
From: Heidi Joy Tretheway
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 2:25 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design
Hi Ironic team,
[TL;DR - we agree to Miles
Hi Ironic team,
[TL;DR - we agree to Miles’ proposal for two images (one mascot, one logo) for
different contexts. We’re looking for any final feedback on the stylized logo
for use on the website, while the PixieBoots mascot remains yours for swag,
etc.]
I’m doing my best to reply to all ques
Hi Heidi,
Thanks for the email.
I don't wanna be rude but we left the last ML thread [0] with many
questions without an answer. It would be good to keep the discussion in one
thread only to make it easier for people to read about it in the future.
I don't think we have much of a choice, so, the
Hi Ironic team,
Thanks for your feedback, especially helping us to ensure that the mascot would
be culturally appropriate worldwide. Our most recent offering to the team was
generally liked, with a request to cut it off at the middle (head/arms/top of
the stomach) per Dmitry. Note this version
Just thinking – horns seem pretty metal, what do you think about goat-like
horned bear? :)
Joanna
On 2/6/17, 5:26 AM, "Sam Betts (sambetts)" wrote:
+100
On 06/02/2017, 12:32, "Dmitry Tantsur" wrote:
On 02/06/2017 12:49 PM, Miles Gould wrote:
> On 01/02/17 21:
+100
On 06/02/2017, 12:32, "Dmitry Tantsur" wrote:
On 02/06/2017 12:49 PM, Miles Gould wrote:
> On 01/02/17 21:38, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
>> But, let me ask something, what the foundation really wants to achieve
>> with this ? Cause I think we are conflating two things here:
On 02/06/2017 12:49 PM, Miles Gould wrote:
On 01/02/17 21:38, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
But, let me ask something, what the foundation really wants to achieve
with this ? Cause I think we are conflating two things here: A logo (or
brand) and a mascot.
I think this is an excellent point. The c
On 01/02/17 21:38, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
But, let me ask something, what the foundation really wants to achieve
with this ? Cause I think we are conflating two things here: A logo (or
brand) and a mascot.
I think this is an excellent point. The constraints on logos make a lot
of sense *fo
I'm only barely an Ironic contributor these days, but what about having
the bear do David Lee Roth's famous jump?
http://www.vhnd.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/kick_fb.jpg
Doesn't require props, and no hand gestures.
Alternatively, you could have the bear playing air guitar... if that can
be ca
]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2017 10:30 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design
On 02/02/17 16:55, Loo, Ruby wrote:
> I guess a 'peace sign' wouldn't work?
That also has severa
On 01/02/17 01:28, arkady.kanev...@dell.com wrote:
I think Russian already owns the bear.
AIUI, trademark law allows for use of the same mark by different
entities provided they operate in different enough spheres to prevent
confusion. Hence the long-running litigation between Apple Music and
On 02/02/17 16:55, Loo, Ruby wrote:
I guess a 'peace sign' wouldn't work?
That also has several meanings:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V_sign
On the other hand, the palm-forward version has no offensive meanings
that I can see (the offensive version is palm-backwards).
I like the propose
Hi,
> I'm with the group here.
>
> Let's find something that looks nice and is not offensive to anyone.
>
+1
...
Also, Heidi, I forgot to ask in the previous emails and I couldn't
find in the guidelines[0]: What license will these images have ? Will
people be allowed to share and create derivat
Oh...
I'm with the group here.
Let's find something that looks nice and is not offensive to anyone.
Mathieu
On 2017-02-02 11:52 AM, Jay Faulkner wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_of_the_horns came up in IRC, as the sign the
bear is making. Obviously to me, I read it as the heavy meta
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_of_the_horns came up in IRC, as the sign the
bear is making. Obviously to me, I read it as the heavy metal gesture.
Apparently it is offensive in some cultures, so I change my vote to -1, since I
don’t want to offend folks in other parts of the world :).
-Jay
I think Jay has phrased it perfectly. With the context of the earlier
discussion and the rules put forth at the beginning of this logo creation
effort, I feel like the 3.0 version is our only real option for an official
mascot in line with our team’s spirit. +1 to version 3.0.
Long live pixieb
Of the proposed logos, I do like the latest version the best. It appears
friendly and fun. So I'm +1 on it.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy <
pshchelokovs...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 to Jay, the 3.0 version looks ok - it is friendly and rocking :)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dr
Hi,
+1 to Jay, the 3.0 version looks ok - it is friendly and rocking :)
Cheers,
Dr. Pavlo Shchelokovskyy
Senior Software Engineer
Mirantis Inc
www.mirantis.com
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 10:38 PM, Jay Faulkner wrote:
> Of the options presented, I think the new 3.0 version most brings to mind
> a
Of the options presented, I think the new 3.0 version most brings to mind a
rocking bear. It’s still tough to be OK with a new logo, given that pixie
boots is beloved by our team partially because Lucas took the time to make us
one — but it seems like not accepting a new logo created by the fou
On 1/31/2017 7:28 PM, arkady.kanev...@dell.com wrote:
I think Russian already owns the bear.
^ is my favorite statement of the day. Thank you.
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for us
I prefer our current homegrown logo. I wish we could just keep using that.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Jay Faulkner wrote:
> I concur with most of the other comments on the thread. I have a strong
> preference for our existing mascot, and don’t think the new one is an
> improvement.
>
> Than
I concur with most of the other comments on the thread. I have a strong
preference for our existing mascot, and don’t think the new one is an
improvement.
Thanks,
Jay
> On Jan 31, 2017, at 12:49 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
>
> Hey ironic-ers,
>
> The foundation has passed along a new version
day, January 31, 2017 at 5:13 PM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design
I may be biased to some extent but I don't like it.
The mascot doesn't seem to have any personality. It also looks od
See below.
On 2017-02-01 2:37 AM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote:
Hi all,
this new logo actually reminds me of a wide-spread Russian meme
Thanks for teaching us about this meme.
The new logo has a striking similarity with the meme. Is it possible
that it was an inside joke / reference to that
, January 31, 2017 2:49 PM
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design
>
>
>
> Hey ironic-ers,
>
> The foundation has passed along a new version of
I think Russian already owns the bear.
From: Jim Rollenhagen [mailto:j...@jimrollenhagen.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 2:49 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design
Hey ironic-ers,
The foundation has passed
I may be biased to some extent but I don't like it.
The mascot doesn't seem to have any personality. It also looks odd
because he has this straight face while he's doing the sign of horns,
it just doesn't work.
I remember when I first saw a logo related to Ironic in that
presentation that Jay and
aneiro de 2017 17:49:09
Subject: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design
Hey ironic-ers,
The foundation has passed along a new version of our mascot (attached) to us,
and would like your feedback on it.
They're hoping to have all mascot-related things ready in time for the PTG
Hey ironic-ers,
The foundation has passed along a new version of our mascot (attached) to
us, and would like your feedback on it.
They're hoping to have all mascot-related things ready in time for the PTG,
so please do send your thoughts quickly, if you have them. :)
// jim
_
47 matches
Mail list logo