On 27/11/16 23:54 +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 10/12/2016 02:50 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
One of the common complains about the existing project organization in
the big
tent is that it's difficult to wrap our heads around the many projects
there
are, their current state (i
_____
From: Flavio Percoco [fla...@redhat.com]
Sent: 25 November 2016 20:26
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Exposing project team's metadata in
README files
On 25/11/16 13:16 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 25/11/16 12:38 +0100, Flavio
On 25/11/16 09:15 -0800, Christopher Aedo wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 3:38 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
Just a heads up for everyone. The work on this front has moved forward and
the
badges are now being generated as part of the governance CI[0].
You can find the list of badges
ck.org/#/c/399278/ landed. I'll be improving the
layout a bit better based on the feedback from your email.
Thanks,
Flavio
-amrith
-Original Message-----
From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2016 9:00 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
ommit message b and \n was just me being bitten by python 3.5. I fixed
that for other commits but it's harmless to have it in yours. :D
With many thanks,
/Ian
Flavio Percoco wrote on 11/25/2016 11:00 PM:
On 25/11/16 13:46 +, Amrith Kumar wrote:
Flavio,
I see a number of patche
st
[3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/402547/
[4] https://gist.github.com/anonymous/4ccf1cc6e531bb50e78cb4d64dfe1065
[5] https://gist.github.com/1f38def1c65c733b7e4cec3d07399e99
[6] https://gist.github.com/2f1c6e9b800db6d4a49d46f5b0623c1d
[7] https://gist.github.com/9e9e2e2ba4ecfdece7827082114f8258
On 25/11/16 12:33 +, Dulko, Michal wrote:
On Fri, 2016-11-25 at 12:38 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
Just a heads up for everyone. The work on this front has moved
forward and the
badges are now being generated as part of the governance CI[0].
You can find the list of badges here
On 25/11/16 13:16 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 25/11/16 12:38 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
Just a heads up for everyone. The work on this front has moved forward and the
badges are now being generated as part of the governance CI[0].
You can find the list of badges here[1] and
On 25/11/16 12:38 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
Just a heads up for everyone. The work on this front has moved forward and the
badges are now being generated as part of the governance CI[0].
You can find the list of badges here[1] and the pattern is quite obvious, the
name of the
avio
P.S: The current layout is being improved[3], if you have better ideas please
help out.
[0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/391588/
[1] http://governance.openstack.org/badges/
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:project-badges
[3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/399278/
On 12/1
of the sections
specific for their teams.
https://review.openstack.org/398875
Thanks,
Flavio
On 07/11/16 09:09 -0800, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
I literally just posted a thing on my blog with some thoughts of what I'd expect
any new language being proposed for OpenStack to cover befor
k out a way to embrace change and
innovate. That's what I'm trying to do here, work out a way for us to embrace
new languages and move on to the next change.
As Clint put ir, we need to own the change and the chaos that will come with it.
Not having these p
the community.
Also, for the evaluation of the use case, it'd be awesome to have the use case
presented to the mailing list before the item is even added to the TC agenda. I
liked the review that other members of the community did with the Swift
proposal.
Flavio
very beginning of the process, before
the up front work is even started.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: open
On 07/11/16 12:16 -0600, Monty Taylor wrote:
On 11/07/2016 11:58 AM, Hayes, Graham wrote:
On 07/11/2016 17:14, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
I literally just posted a thing on my blog with some thoughts of what I'd expect
any new language being proposed for OpenStack to cover before i
d
- Define how stable maintenance will work
- Setup the CI pipelines for the new language
The longer and more detailed version is here:
https://blog.flaper87.com/embracing-other-languages-openstack.html
Stay tuned,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
ck.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Perco
ere.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://li
dback is welcome,
Just wanted to ack and say that there doesn't seem to be conflicts for me.
Thanks,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not
On 13/10/16 13:06 +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 12/10/16 11:01 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2016-10-12 14:50:03 +0200:
Greetings,
One of the common complains about the existing project organization in the big
tent is that it's difficult t
part of the plan.
I would be willing to dig in and help if needed.
Might take your word on this :D
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing Li
On 12/10/16 14:43 -0700, Mike Perez wrote:
On 14:50 Oct 12, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
One of the common complains about the existing project organization in the big
tent is that it's difficult to wrap our heads around the many projects there
are, their current state (in/out the big
r at some other documentation?
The feedback* I've gotten is that users normally look at repos first and they go
from there to docs (which are normally linked in the README file).
* Neither based on a survey nor on any empirical research. This is base
familiar with our processes as some of us are).
Thanks in advance,
Flavio
[0] http://governance.openstack.org/reference/projects/index.html
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
Open
penStack continue to have an advantage?
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink
[1] http://blog.leafe.com/bias/
-- Ed Leafe
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?s
On 10/10/16 09:41 -0500, Michał Jastrzębski wrote:
Everyone,
Kolla plans to be part of PTG in Atlanta. I hope to see you all there!
Great news!
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
s for all your great work!!!
Monty
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signa
those are the Glance priorities for the next two weeks.
cheers,
brian
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.or
ke it happen!
--
Chris Dent ┬─┬ノ( º _ ºノ)https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent tw: @anticdent
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?s
try to come up with
a summary of what has been done and I'll report back. Let's see what comes out
of this.
Thanks again for your help and contributions :)
Flavio
Thanks,
Dims
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 4:23 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 27/09/16 00:41 +, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
re importantly, the content will have to be studied. I'll likely start
working on this and I could use your help whether or not you'll win the election
:)
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
swers.microsoft.com/en-us/msoffice/forum/msoffice_outlook-mso_mac/outlook-for-mac-2016-replying-inline-with-html-no/298b830e-11ea-416c-b951-918d8f9562cb
From: Flavio Percoco
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Date: Friday, September 23, 2016 at 3:
.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsu
s participation.
Regards
-steve
[0]
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/msoffice/forum/msoffice_outlook-mso_mac/outlook-for-mac-2016-replying-inline-with-html-no/298b830e-11ea-416c-b951-918d8f9562cb
From: Flavio Percoco
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
l drop the link here in case you guys want to use it:
http://bit.ly/glance-dashboard
This link contains a section with patches "I've" -2'd.
Hope this helps, let me know if the link still works (it seemed to work here
and you need to be logged in),
Flavio
--
@f
course.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://list
at will affect decision on our side.
Thanks a lot, Michal. This is indeed the kind of info I was looking for and
where I'd love to start from.
Flavio
Welcome to the Chaos;)
On 22 September 2016 at 09:53, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 22/09/16 09:39 -0500, Michał Jastrzębski wrote:
Flavi
written already.
Thanks for your email,
Flavio
Regards
-steve
On 9/22/16, 4:04 AM, "Flavio Percoco" wrote:
Greetings,
I've recently started looking into the container technologies around
OpenStack.
More specifically, I've been looking into the tools that all
la-kubernetes too.
Thanks for getting back,
Flavio
On 22 September 2016 at 09:09, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Flavio
Please see below:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 7:04 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
I've recently started looking into the container technologies around
OpenStack.
More speci
On 22/09/16 10:09 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Flavio
Please see below:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 7:04 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
I've recently started looking into the container technologies around
OpenStack.
More specifically, I've been looking into the tools that
l and kolla contributors that helped me understand better the
work in each of these projects and the direction they are headed
.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
if the outcome is a well thought-out document or a set of
changes to the community. The time spent writing this document is already
helping us to get rid of some tribal knowledge.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
sal
is encouraging PTLs to delegate this bit of work, which is crucial. The proposal
does that by recognizing this role in the community (this is not to say other
liaison roles are not important) and by encouraging PTLs to help creating new
leaders in the community.
Again, this is one extra benefit b
___
___
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-
requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______
rs!
Not OpenStack for OpenStack sake!
-Clay
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Fl
riving things and less the
Release Steward.
But, as usual, that may just be me.
Not just you! I agree with this, it sounds like a good fit and match of
responsibilities. As you pointed out, Monty, most of the time the stable
pool. I think this is a good idea and I
believe this would also help PTLs share the load, which is something I've
personally recommended to every PTL.
As other folks mentioned in this thread, I believe this will also help
increasing leadership in the community, which would be anot
hes or the same one.
As everything else we do in this community, this work is meant to evolve and
progress but again, we have to start somewhere. With what's in that review, I
believe it'll be easier for everyone to reason about the document and the
expectations of it.
Flavio
--
@flaper
On 05/09/16 18:55 +0700, Ian Wells wrote:
On 5 September 2016 at 17:08, Flavio Percoco wrote:
We should probably start by asking ourselves who's really being bitten by
the
messaging bus right now? Large (and please, let's not bikeshed on what a
Large
Cloud is) Clouds? Small Clouds?
ersation with like-minded individuals. I'd like to get
these conversations started, and start work to move forward with actual
improvements. If you want to do that as well, please review this:
https://review.openstack.org/335141
___
a -2?
Sounds like a good case for improving our review process and learn from it.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
U
ommunity about how we can implement rolling upgrades and it seems like Glance's
case is very similar to keystone's.
I'll make sure folks in the glance community are aware of this thread and reach
out.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
s.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for u
d Glare but,
ultimatedly, the decision is community's.
It's not just a matter of "lack of merges/reviews" per se, it's a matter of
priorities for Glance. Glance's team cannot (and have not been able to for
several cycles) afford a new API/service just yet. The team
On 02/08/16 15:13 +, Hayes, Graham wrote:
On 02/08/2016 15:42, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 01/08/16 10:19 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 08/01/2016 09:58 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Thierry, Ben, Doug,
How can we distinguish between. "Project is doing the right thing, but
others ar
could be opened for
removal, but there is nothing new here.
I think some flexibility on this should be considered (as mentioned by Thierry
in the previous paragraph) but I'd be quite worried of extremely special-cased
projects and I'd like us to be able to act on this cases.
Flavio
the time you've served as a member of the TC and for taking making
this call with such sense of responsibility. I appreciate your willingness to
recognize your shift of priorities.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP sign
re what the "best practice"
is for that).
Count me in!
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsub
verse-affiliation tags
are applied automatically.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev
___
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio
need to differentiate them after all.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description:
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
hose cases,
the governance repository is the source of truth not the press release.
1. Alter the mission statement of fuel to match the reality being
published by the press and Mirantis's executive team
2. Include these non-experimental repos in the projects.yaml governance
repository
Wh
/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org
mmunity and other involved people.
Best regards,
Mikhail Fedosin
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-
cribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Ma
there are
still good and bad things to come. How fast we'll adapt/react to those will
determine the success of the big tent.
I agree there are things that need to be changed or reflected on already and
your email, Graham's and Clynt's are a good example of the
in a week from now.
[1]
http://stackalytics.com/?module=zaqar-group&metric=commits&release=all&user_id=therve
+1 makes total sense to me!
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
hat bug wasn't a ton of fun to fix!
Glance should be ok and I've just proposed a patch like Ihar's for Zaqar.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Dev
any plan until we
are able to get not only nova but all the projects in the starter-kit:compute[0]
running pn python3 (and w/ a full stack test).
[0] https://governance.openstack.org/reference/tags/starter-kit_compute.html
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signa
asonable to set a community-wide goal for our next
release cycle.
Thoughts?
Sounds good to me!
We should start working with PTL's/Teams in advance to make sure we have enough
attendance at the summit session to (I'd hope to see one happening, at least) so
that we can work on a more re
452.html
> [2]
http://docs.openstack.org/admin-guide/_images/openstack-arch-kilo-logical-v1.png
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.opens
ve.
[0]
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-September/044845.html
[long snip]
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing Li
TC weren't doing its job. My point of view is that this group of humans
is contributing and I'm happy to see that happening.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenSta
estions)
> Unsubscribe:
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
___
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-
requ...@lists.openst
er composition (i.e. support docker-compose like DSL).
NOTE: I might forgot and mis-understood something. Please feel free to point
out if anything is wrong or missing.
It sounds you've got more than enough to work on for now, I think it's fine to
table these topics for now.
just
rote:
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Flavio Percoco mailto:fla...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 20/05/16 18:00 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
Hello all,
I want to propose having a dedicated virtual sync next week
Thursday May
26th at 1500UTC for one hour o
the same page and soon start merging those spec changes.
This is tomorrow! Have we decided the tool?
An invite would be lovely :D
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack
ata plane services that can't be in python? If Swift wasn't the
leading
example here would we be having the conversation at all?
This would have happened anyway. There are other services that could have
similar requirements as Swift. Designate is one. I think Zaqar could also have
such requ
t won't help with keeping the
focus.
This is, of course, just my opinion.
[0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/312267/
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Devel
how Aodh and other services do this.
I think one of the main problems Zaqar has now is that it doesn't have a way to
offload the webhook work to other zaqar nodes but I think we can change this
easily enough.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 13/05/16 17:10 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
On 5/13/16 4:29 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 13/05/16 15:52 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
On 5/13/16 3:36 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 12/05/16 21:41 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
I have been of the same opinion as far as upgrades go.
I think
Qualify or quantify your objections, but please don't just give us
your unfiltered opinions.
++
[snip]
As a counterpoint, I think we mostly need more understanding of our
distributed nature, and to let go of the idea that we can control any
of it. To anyone involved
On 13/05/16 15:52 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
On 5/13/16 3:36 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 12/05/16 21:41 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
I have been of the same opinion as far as upgrades go.
I think we are stepping ahead of ourselves here a bit. We need to
figure out
the rolling upgrade
sage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_
tial upgrade or something similar to
that.
Thanks a bunch for your feedback,
Flavio
I don’t think we would’ve been able to do that if all the glance-apis were
talking to the DB, (At least not in glance’s current state)
Sam
On 12 May 2016, at 1:51 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
g is still pointing users at the command line in v1 mode
Thanks,
Kevin
*From:* Matt Fischer [m...@mattfischer.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, May 12, 2016 4:43 PM
*To:* Flavio Percoco
*Cc:* openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org;
openst
On 12/05/16 18:21 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
On 5/12/16 6:19 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
On 5/12/16 6:04 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 12/05/16 17:38 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
Comments, alternate proposal inline.
On 5/12/16 8:35 AM, Jeremy Stanley
onsider final votes by Thur May 19 2100 UTC.
Can we ask Stuart if he's ok with us removing him from the coresec team? I think
he won't have time for it and it'd be irresponsible from us to send VMT bugs to
him at this point.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.as
is service should be kept around?
Summit etherpad:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-glance-registry-deprecation
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Ma
On 11/05/16 09:47 -0500, Dean Troyer wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
[language mixing bits were here]
The above is my main concern with this proposal. I've mentioned this in the
upstream review and I'm glad to have found it here as well. The
ist (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: ope
Stack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
_
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@f
ists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
eft off [1].
Wait, what? NO! I FORBID YOU TO GO AWAY! >.>
Sorry to hear that, Stuart. I hope to see you back in Glance soon.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Dev
M, Gregory
Haynes wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2016, at 08:55 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
From: Peter MacKinnon
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 05/04/2016 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][sahara][in
201 - 300 of 1147 matches
Mail list logo
