Hi,
I’ll be on vacation till Dec 17th. I’ll be replying emails but with delays.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ
Hi Ken,
Awesome! IMO it works for us.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 20 Oct 2018, 01:19 +0700, Ken Giusti , wrote:
> Hi Renat,
> After discussing this a bit with Ben on IRC we're going to push the removal
> off to T milestone 1.
>
> I really like Ben's idea re: adding
the deprecation warning.
> >
> > We could perhaps implement time duration checks around the executor
> > callout and log a warning if the executor blocked for an extended amount
> > of time (extended=TBD).
> >
> > Other opinions so we can come to a consensus?
it smoothly.
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/mistral/+bug/1696469
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.
calculation and if not, use the old way.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 26 Sep 2018, 18:02 +0700, Олег Овчарук , wrote:
> Hi everyone! Please take a look to the blueprint that i've just created
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-add-started-finished-at
&g
I’m also in favour of backporting it because it solves a real production
problem.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 5 Sep 2018, 16:55 +0700, Dougal Matthews , wrote:
> > On 5 September 2018 at 10:52, Dougal Matthews wrote:
> > > > (Note: I added [release] to the email subjec
It’s disappointing that we can’t make it this time. Really bad coincidence of
different issues..
I’d love to have a virtual PTG and Dmitry’s notes look very helpful to me.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 21 Aug 2018, 17:15 +0700, Dmitry Tantsur , wrote:
> On 08/21/2018 10:22 AM, Dou
Awesome! We need to do it periodically :) It’ll be easier to sort out patches.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 6 Aug 2018, 16:24 +0700, Dougal Matthews , wrote:
>
>
> > On 3 August 2018 at 10:45, Dougal Matthews wrote:
> > > > On 9 July 2018 at 16:13, Dougal Matthews wr
Dougal, the policy looks good for me. I gave it the second +2 but didn’t
approve yet so that others could also review (e.g. Adriano and Vitalii).
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 3 Aug 2018, 16:46 +0700, Dougal Matthews , wrote:
> > On 9 July 2018 at 16:13, Dougal Matthews wrote:
>
Lingxian, and any time welcome back as an active contributor if you wish! :) I
want to thank you for all contribution and achievements you made for our
project!
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 3 Aug 2018, 17:14 +0700, Lingxian Kong , wrote:
> +1 for me, i am still watching mistral :-)
>
&g
Dougal, I’m totally OK with this idea.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 9 Jul 2018, 22:14 +0700, Dougal Matthews , wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I'd like to propose that we start abandoning old Gerrit reviews.
>
> This report shows how stale and out of date some of the
>
> If you have a scaling issue that may be solved by eventlet, that's
> one thing, but please don't adopt eventlet just because a lot of
> other projects have. We've tried several times to minimize our
> reliance on eventlet because new releases tend to introduce bugs.
>
> Have you tried the 'thre
/mistral/+bug/1696469
[2] https://docs.openstack.org/oslo.messaging/ocata/executors.html#eventlet
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ
solving
challenging technical tasks. It’s been a great pleasure to work with Vitalii
and I hope can will keep up doing great job.
Core members, please vote.
Vitalii’s statistics:
http://stackalytics.com/?module=mistral-group&metric=marks&user_id=mcdoker18
Thanks
Renat Akhmero
Yep, agree that this is a bug. We need to fix that. Would you please create a
ticket at LP?
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 27 Apr 2018, 12:53 +0700, Vitalii Solodilov , wrote:
> > No matter at what stage the task is, but if it’s still in RUNNING state or
> > FAILED but we kno
use all
attempts then the ‘timeout’ policy should force the task to fail. If it’s the
second case when it’s FAILED but the retry policy is still in play then we need
to leave some ‘force’ marker in the task state to make sure that there’s no
need to retry it further.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
Dougal,
Most likely, I’ll go.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
24 апр. 2018 г., 17:05 +0700, Dougal Matthews , писал:
>
>
> > On 23 April 2018 at 20:58, Sean McGinnis wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 07:32:40PM +, Kendall Nelson wrote:
> > > > Hey Doug
C channel for better communication.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
of the
> > first additions to mistral-extra.
> >
> > [1]: https://github.com/d0ugal/mistral-ansible-actions
> >
Yes, I agree.
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for u
action can be
implemented anywhere and plugged into a concrete Mistral installation where
needed.
As a home for this action I’d propose 'mistral-extra’ repo where we are
planning to move OpenStack actions and some more.
Also, if you’d like to contribute you’re very welcome.
Thanks
Renat Akh
On 29 Mar 2018, 20:20 +0700, Doug Hellmann , wrote:
> What sorts of tools are you talking about building?
Well, some more high level functions to diagnose memory usage, especially aids
to help find memory leaks. Or not even necessary memory leaks, we may also
want/need to reduce the memory foot
). If needed,
objgraph can be manually installed used when we need to investigate something.
If such practice is considered OK and doesn’t violate any OpenStack guidelines
then I think this would work, at least in my case.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 29 Mar 2018, 15:00 +0700, Renat Akhmerov
maybe there’s some alternative already available in the OpenStack
requirements?
[1] https://pypi.python.org/pypi/objgraph/3.4.0
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions
te.
>
> Etherpad:
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mistral-ptg-rocky
>
Thanks Dougal, looks nice )
> It was unfortunate that the "Beast from the East" (the weather, not Renat!)
> stopped thin
info.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 7 Mar 2018, 12:33 +0700, Renat Akhmerov , wrote:
> Thanks Dougal, I’ll also look at it to see what’s still relevant.
>
>
> Renat Akhmerov
> @Nokia
>
> On 6 Mar 2018, 21:24 +0700, Dougal Matthews , wrote:
> > Hey folks,
> >
>
Thanks Dougal, I’ll also look at it to see what’s still relevant.
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 6 Mar 2018, 21:24 +0700, Dougal Matthews , wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Mistral has several Wiki pages that rank highly in Google searches. However,
> most of them have not been updated in months
Thanks!
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 14 Feb 2018, 22:55 +0700, Matthew Thode , wrote:
> On 18-02-14 17:03:10, Renat Akhmerov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We were asked to do a FFE request to be able to release a new version of
> > Mistral client out of stable/queens branch.
stable/queens by many users.
Hence we’re kindly asking to approve the release patch.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ
going on etc.)
And I’m still hoping that more people will give their feedback on the proposal
itself.
Just to remind what the proposed time slots for office hours are:
1. Mon 16.00 UTC (it used to be our time of weekly meetings)
2. Wed 3.00 UTC
3. Fri 8.00 UTC
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
people in Asia and America. And #3 for people living in Europe and Asia. At
least that was my thinking when I was wondering what the time slots should be.
Please share your thoughts on this. The idea itself and whether the time slots
look ok.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
Hi,
I'm Renat Akhmerov. I'm running for PTL of Mistral in Rocky.
Mistral is a workflow service developed within the OpenStack community from
the ground up.
In queens we mainly focused on bugfixing, improving performance and
documentation. Performance was again significantly improved
Sorry for the late reply. I just want to confirm that it’s ok from Mistral side.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 2 Feb 2018, 02:35 +0700, Sean McGinnis , wrote:
> Just confirming and closing things out. We did not receive any negative
> responses to the plan below, so a little earlier t
Adriano, you now have +2 vote and can approve patches :) Welcome!
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 16 Jan 2018, 05:03 +0700, Lingxian Kong , wrote:
> welcome to the team, Adriano!
>
>
> Cheers,
> Lingxian Kong (Larry)
>
> > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:11 PM, Renat Akhmer
core team.
Adriano’s statistics:
http://stackalytics.com/?module=mistral-group&release=queens&user_id=apetrich
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: o
We (Mistral) are ready to react too whenever the version is bumped. IMO, the
sooner the better.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 9 Jan 2018, 04:00 +0700, Matthew Thode , wrote:
> On 17-12-20 10:56:50, Matthew Thode wrote:
> > On 17-12-20 15:51:17, Afek, Ifat (Nokia - IL/Kfar Sa
Ok, we’ll look at it in Queens.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 20 Dec 2017, 23:57 +0700, Matthew Thode , wrote:
> On 17-12-20 15:51:17, Afek, Ifat (Nokia - IL/Kfar Sava) wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There is an open bug in launchpad about the new release of Networkx 2.0,
our IRC channel
#openstack-mistral or write to this mailing list with tags
"[openstack-dev][mistral]” in the subject.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubs
7;t see how the proposed solution
> solves it.
Yes, exactly.
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscrib
because I’m also trying to combine development with PTLship, but
still..
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 14 Dec 2017, 12:02 +0700, Ed Leafe , wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2017, at 5:44 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
> > One thing I've always admired about Swift was how immune to the cadence
>
Ooh, my apologies for the typo!
Thanks Dougal )
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 20 Nov 2017, 18:42 +0700, Dougal Matthews , wrote:
>
>
> > On 20 November 2017 at 08:56, Renat Akhmerov
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I’ll be on vacation from
Hi,
I’ll be on vacation from Nov 23 till Dec 4, inclusive. Dougal Matthews (d0gal)
will be replacing me during this period.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions
Hi, we’re cancelling the team meeting today because a number of key members
won’t attend.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ
Ok, thanks for your input.
I’d personally say it’s not really worth it but if Bob wants to do it that’s ok.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 19 Oct 2017, 12:46 +0700, ChangBo Guo , wrote:
> The dependencies of mistral expressions package make it hard to be adopted
> as a module o
this code needs to be reused somewhere else outside OpenStack space
(like in Bob’s case) may be it’s just simpler to create a project on github?
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 10 Oct 2017, 22:11 +0700, Doug Hellmann , wrote:
> Excerpts from HADDLETON, Robert W (Bob)'s message of 2017-10-
that we’re not going to break TripleO.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 17 Oct 2017, 20:21 +0700, Dougal Matthews , wrote:
>
>
> > On 17 October 2017 at 09:19, Renat Akhmerov
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We have two patches in Mistral that we nee
I'm asking your advice on what we can do in this situation. Can we
merge these patches if we make sure that we don't break anyone in the
community? For example, TripleO.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenStack D
issues in the
> backend plumbing.
Hi Monty, does it make sense to recheck patches in this case?
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ..
Ok, thanks Josh. We switched to tenacity and it works very well for us )
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 23 Sep 2017, 11:51 +0700, Joshua Harlow , wrote:
> Hi Renat,
>
> I was more just saying that depending on your situation it might be
> better to switch to using tenacity (not th
conflicts with our openness
principle.. It’s just really tempting quite often.
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 22 Sep 2017, 09:26 +0700, Zhipeng Huang , wrote:
> Let's not forget the epic fail earlier on the "contribution.rst fix" that
> almost melt down the community CI system.
>
mp it to 4.4.0?
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 21 Sep 2017, 22:42 +0700, Joshua Harlow , wrote:
> It does look like is sort of a bug,
>
> Though in all honesty I wouldn't be using oslo.service or that looping
> code in the future for doing retrying...
>
> https://pypi.python.org
decorator in Mistral and it’s also used in Nova, [2].
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.service/+bug/1718635
[2]
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova/tree/nova/virt/disk/mount/api.py
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
I confirm that you can delete mistral versions with “2015”.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 15 Sep 2017, 23:58 +0700, Rong Zhu , wrote:
> +1 for murano-dashboard and murano-agent
>
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 1:51 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> > Claudiu Belu wrote:
> > > S
Hi,
There won’t be a team today. Let’s meet next week and discuss the PTG summary
and the current activities.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe
-queens
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
Hi,
We’re cancelling the team meeting today in IRC since our US team members have
Labor Day.
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ
Hi,
I’ll be on vacation between Aug 14th and 28th.
Dougal Matthews (d0ugal in IRC) kindly agreed to replace me while I’m off.
Please contact him, if needed.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenStack Development Mailing
i
[2] https://www.openstack.org/videos/boston-2017/mistral-performance-in-numbers
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack
Thanks!
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 8 Aug 2017, 23:23 +0700, Matthew Thode , wrote:
> On 17-08-08 08:03:42, Matthew Thode wrote:
> > On 17-08-08 16:11:53, Renat Akhmerov wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We recently sent a patch [1] to release the version 3.1.2 o
On 8 Aug 2017, 17:45 +0700, Thierry Carrez , wrote:
> Renat Akhmerov wrote:
> > [...]
> > So long story short, this change will affect your project only if you
> > use “mistral action-execution-list” CLI command because now this command
> > will be returning by d
n the discussion in [1].
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/491269
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/476110/
[3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/489217/
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List
Hi,
I’d like to continue to be the PTL of Mistral project and submitted my
candidacy.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/491686/
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
Hi,
We decided to cancel today’s Mistral meeting.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http
/sydney-2017/vote-for-speakers#/19196
• Advanced Fault Management with Vitrage and Mistral -
https://www.openstack.org/summit/sydney-2017/vote-for-speakers#/19508
All of them should be very cool so don’t hesitate to vote for them :)
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
Thanks Guy! Great work )
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 11 Jul 2017, 16:53 +0700, Dougal Matthews , wrote:
> Thanks for this - it is really useful to be able to click around and play
> with the UI - gives me a much better feel for it.
>
>
> > On 11 July 2017 at 08:26, Shaanan, Gu
On 11 Jul 2017, 00:27 +0700, wrote:
> openstack/mistral-dashboard
> openstack/mistral-extra
These two are not supposed to have docs at all. We should probably just remove
the “doc” folder and corresponding CI jobs.
> openstack/mistral-lib
This should be taken care of soon.
Renat
Lingxian, good idea. Most likely, we’ll record it and share publicly.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 4 Jul 2017, 19:21 +0700, Lingxian Kong , wrote:
> That's awesome! It'd be better if there is a demo for introduction :-)
>
>
> Cheers,
> Lingxian Kong (Larry)
>
>
Cool, thanks Dougal!
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 28 Jun 2017, 15:21 +0700, Dougal Matthews , wrote:
> > On 23 June 2017 at 12:52, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> > > Dougal Matthews wrote:
> > > >> We have been trying to break the requirement on mistral (from
> >
Hi,
Just a small addition. “mistral action-update” applies only to so-called ad-hoc
actions which are essentially wrappers written in YAML. You can’t update a
regular action written in Python and plugged in Mistral with stevedore using
this command.
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 28 Jun 2017, 08
I can say for Mistral . We only planned to add Mistral docs to the central repo
but didn’t do it yet. So, as far as I understand, we don’t need to move
anything. We’ll review the spec and adjust the folder structure according to
the proposed.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
23 июня 2017 г., 3
We'll do that.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
23 июня 2017 г., 18:54 +0700, Thierry Carrez , писал:
> Dougal Matthews wrote:
> > > We have been trying to break the requirement on mistral (from
> > > tripleo-common) but it is proving to be harder than expected. We are
>
Ok, I think I already got my question answered:
https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/oslo.messaging/unreleased.html#deprecation-notes
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 13 Jun 2017, 13:59 +0700, Renat Akhmerov , wrote:
> Hi Oslo team,
>
> Can you please clarify for how long you pla
worried when we heard the news that it’s now been deprecated.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
We have a weekly meeting next Monday, will it be too late?
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 1 Jun 2017, 20:10 +0700, Thierry Carrez , wrote:
> Note that it's technically too late to change the release model
> (milestone-1 is the deadline), but since that kills two birds with one
> stone,
Thanks Thierry.
To me it sounds like even a better release model for us. We can discuss it with
a team at the next team meeting and make a decision.
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 1 Jun 2017, 17:06 +0700, Thierry Carrez , wrote:
> Renat Akhmerov wrote:
> > On 31 May 2017, 15:08 +0700, Thier
ne stable branch per cycle. I’d
appreciate if you could clarify this.
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsu
Ok, thanks Tuan.
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 29 May 2017, 17:38 +0700, lương hữu tuấn , wrote:
> Hi Renat,
>
> Kong is going to move on with this patch and then i will continue with the
> main problem of trust token in Mistral.
>
> Br,
>
> Tuan/Nokia
>
> > On Mo
> > > >> If
> > > >> you have the time you can take a look at it and let us know if you
> > > >> have any
> > > >> comments.
> > > >
> > > > Ah, that explains why I couldn't find it in the freezer repo. :-)
> >
Hi,
We’re cancelling today’s meeting since most of the key members can’t attend due
to holidays in UK and US.
Team, please keep in mind that next week we will release Pike-2. Try to wrap up
your most important work this week.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
Thanks Doug. We’ll look into this.
@Tuan, is there any roadblocks with the patch you’re working on? [1]
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/455407/
Renat
On 26 May 2017, 01:54 +0700, Doug Hellmann , wrote:
> The new work to add the exception information and request ID tracing
> depends on usi
Hi,
I’m joining Lingxian to say thank you for addressing this.
In addition I’d like to say that we have huge plans to rework the entire
actions subsystem till the end of this year so that implementing and managing
actions become really easy and enjoying. We’ll definitely look closer at your
co
This looks like a simple and elegant way to solve the issue. 100% supported by
me (and hopefully others).
Thanks for addressing it.
Renat
On 29 Apr 2017, 06:19 +0700, Monty Taylor , wrote:
> On 04/28/2017 06:07 PM, Adrian Turjak wrote:
> >
> > This sounds like a fantastic path forward as the v
Ok, thanks Doug.
Renat
On 24 Apr 2017, 22:16 +0700, Doug Hellmann , wrote:
> A recent patch in python-mistralclient added a release note that was
> poorly formatted, so it broke announcement job for the 3.1.0 release.
>
> I've proposed a fix for the note file in
> https://review.openstack.org/459
Hi, it was released as 3.1.0 recently.
Renat
On 24 Apr 2017, 20:14 +0700, Juan Antonio Osorio , wrote:
> Hey,
>
> We're trying to migrate the undercloud to use keystone v3. But we're
> currently blocked by having an older version of mistralclient available. We
> would really use a release to mo
d_wsgi. We can make it non-apache if you
> > like. Would be pretty easy to do so.
No, that’s fine. Let’s leave it with mod_wsgi as it’s closer to most real
production environments.
Thanks
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenSt
that checks if it still needs to be
running (i.e. making a request to a 3rd party), it can be done using
conditional transitions
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
> On 23 Mar 2017, at 09:40, Lingxian Kong wrote:
>
> Yeah, as Bob said, cron-trigger is what you are looking for.
>
> As our di
overcomplexity
> for our task at hand.
Yes, that’s what I thought too when I read your message. :)
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@l
you see a concrete idea about using zope interfaces please share. I’m
interested in that.
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
> On 14 Mar 2017, at 22:14, Adriano Petrich wrote:
>
> Sorry if I'm missing the point here, and for being late on the discussion.
> But what about zope interface
END:VCALENDAR
Renat Akhmerov@Nokia
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
about
the current OpenStack actions and think how to rewrite them (extract the common
infrastructure they use,
make them more extensible, etc.)
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage ques
):
…
Is this flexible enough or does it have any potential issues?
IMO, base class is still needed to define the contract that all actions should
follow. So that
a runner knew what’s possible to do with actions.
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
> On 13 Mar 2017, at 16:49, lương hữu tuấn wr
hat seems the best then reevaluate, change it etc. While mistral-lib is
considered experimental we can try different options.
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscr
> On 10 Mar 2017, at 15:09, Dougal Matthews wrote:
>
> On 10 March 2017 at 04:22, Renat Akhmerov <mailto:renat.akhme...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I probably like the base class approach better too.
>
> However, I’m trying to understand if we need this v
o over these items and
prioritize/scope/assign them.
I would also like to reevaluate priorities of other tasks that are now formally
scoped for
Pike cycle. The expected result is to build a roadmap for Pike next week.
[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mistral-ptg-pike
<http
timate goals of OpenStack? Or
if they already exist we need to better explain them and advertise publicly?
That in turn IMO could attract more businesses and contributors.
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenStack Developm
?
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
> On 9 Mar 2017, at 11:35, Ryan Brady wrote:
>
> At the PTG and previous discussions in IRC, I mentioned there were two
> different design ideas I had for the developer experience for custom action
> development in mistral-lib. The purpose and intent behind t
that seems to be not easy now.
Would appreciate your input.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/434344/
<https://review.openstack.org/#/c/434344/>
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (n
Thank you guys!
Michal, you’re now included to the core team.
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
> On 2 Mar 2017, at 03:50, Lingxian Kong wrote:
>
> +1, she indeed has been doing great contribution to Mistral, welcome, Michal
> :-)
>
>
> Cheers,
> Lingxian Kong (Larry)
>
&g
.
Please let me know if you agree with that.
Thanks
[1]
http://stackalytics.com/?module=mistral-group&release=ocata&user_id=michal-gershenzon
<http://stackalytics.com/?module=mistral-group&release=ocata&user_id=michal-gershenzon>
Hi,
We just started our Mistral sessions, everybody is welcome to participate!
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org
Ok, thanks.
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
> On 21 Feb 2017, at 09:17, Rico Lin wrote:
>
> Dear all
> Just reminding the Cross-Project session: OpenStack Orchestration Integration
> Will take place at 11:00 on Thursday in `Macon` room.
>
> 2017-02-14 21:49 GMT+08:00 Joh
1 - 100 of 683 matches
Mail list logo