think it's time we make him a full member of the oslo-core group.
Please respond here with a +1 or -1 to indicate your opinion.
YAY! +1
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack
On 01/03/18 12:09 +, Erno Kuvaja wrote:
2) Removing Flavio Percoco from Glance core. Flavio requested to be
removed already couple of cycles ago and we did beg him to stick
around to help with the Interoperable Image Import which of he has
been integral part of designing since the very
guang-yee
oslo-service-core: Marian Horban
+1
Thanks everyone
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev
(source:
https://www.owlpages.com/owls/species.php?s=10)
Stay tuned!
--
Your fellow reporter, Emilien Macchi
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org
gs out of "host paths" the better! Kubernetes
is not a requirement for these improvements but, I would say they are a
requirement for a k8s based deployment.
That is to say, a k8s based deployment should not depend on hostpaths :)
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Descriptio
/f69a5dcc7b6ab0fdc290fa01eb8e7bdb
And an asciicinema recording of the script running:
https://asciinema.org/a/150376
The requirements are small and it doesn't take too long to run. Eventually, all
the cleanup operations should go into the deprovision tasks file. Working on
that!
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
heir
own signs, placing them in prepared holders outside of the rooms?
Regardless of the format, I think we can experiment with something like this.
It will give teams more flexibility.
Or do we need signs at all? The rooms all have names or numbers
already right?
Or this!
Flavio
--
of this. It was not
brought up during the discussion at the forum. I'm glad you did, though.
If we already have a platform for this then I would say we need to promote it
more and find someone (Josh? ;) that will actively seek for content.
Thanks for pointing us to o.o/blog, Jimmy.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio
d the first one outside
the U.S. I would prefer us to gather some extra data and feedback before we do
any drastic change to the format of the event.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_
#t2017-11-23T15:01:25
[1] http://planet.openstack.org/
[2] http://superuser.openstack.org/
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
concrete updates on the containers squad etherpad as well.
Admitedly, we should be sending updates like this one more often so, I commit to
do so.
[0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-on-kubernetes
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
pealing because they are the ones these folks are actually running in
production.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usa
s back. We dont
have any automatic procudure for this.
thank you
Saverio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: ope
On 26/10/17 10:52 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2017-10-26 13:30:53 +:
On 2017-10-26 14:42:35 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
> I personally don't think the campaing period was too short. I saw
> enough interactions between cand
e. I would also prefer waiting
until the nomination period is closed to start discussion. It might not feel
fair if the discussions start early and then some candidacies use the data from
the discussions as promotion. Again, personal preference.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
D
sts of various kinds in that
blog: technical, community, news, etc. I wonder how many folks from the
community are aware of it and how many would be willing to contribute to it too.
Contributing to the superuser's blog is quite simple, really.
http://superuser.openstack.org/
Flavio
--
@fla
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
On 11/10/17 07:48 +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 10/10/17 10:34 -0600, Alex Schultz wrote:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 5:24 AM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 09/10/17 12:41 -0700, Emilien Macchi wrote:
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.c
/17 14:45 +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
Some of you, TC candidates, expressed concerns about diversity and inclusiveness
(or inclusivity, depending on your taste) in your candidacy. I believe this is a
broad, and some times ill-used, topic so, I'd like to know, from y'all, how you
think we
in a different context.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org
inclusive. What areas would you improve
first?
Thank you,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
On 10/10/17 10:34 -0600, Alex Schultz wrote:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 5:24 AM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 09/10/17 12:41 -0700, Emilien Macchi wrote:
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote:
[...]
1. A repo per role: Each role wo
On 09/10/17 12:41 -0700, Emilien Macchi wrote:
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote:
[...]
1. A repo per role: Each role would have its own repo - this is the way I've
been developing it on Github. This model is closer to the ansible way of
doing
nclude the names and emails anyone that will be speaking with you.
TripleO - Emilien Macchi - emil...@redhat.com
I'll help here if needed :)
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
Ope
-mariadb
[4] https://github.com/tripleo-apb/ansible-role-k8s-glance
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack
Hello Everyone,
This is a friendly reminder that the submission period ends tomorrow (Sep 29th).
Take some time to think about the topics you would like to talk about and submit
them at:
http://forumtopics.openstack.org/cfp/create
Submit your topic before 11:59PM UTC on Friday September 29th!
to multiple user
frontends and also frees the Ironic team up from having to take on
yet more work directly.
ditto!
I had a similar question at the PTG and this was the answer that convinced be
may be worth the effort.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack
this instead of letting
it continue to cause frustration for everyone.
Count me in! I'm interested in helping with this effort.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack
complexity for everyone involved.
Just wanted to +1 this as I just mentioned a technical solution in one of my
replies to this thread on which I also said I doubt it would ever work/help.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
an be used to analyze this behaviors so that we can communicate them
through the right channels.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not
. Once they've been submitted, I think
we're better off merging them if we're not in a release phase.
A more agressive fix would be to limit the amount of patches a single person can
propose in a given day and in a specific period of time (or forever) but this
might not be possible or not exactly
the existing
templates we use for paunch.
Will look into the details of how this works and get back to you,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing Li
an aligns quite
well with what I've been doing so far.
That said, I need to dive more into how `config download` works and start using
it for future demos and development.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Descri
e-mariadb-on-k8s-with-tripleo.html
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/compare/master...flaper87:tht-apbs
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Developm
definitely recommend going with a fork, fwiw.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ
==
There are no meetings scheduled for next week.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ
ollaborate there to make improvements without
ruining infra's day. ;)
As long as you can put up with a few Dad jokes, I'll be there.
++ I'm interested in this topic too!
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP
next
week while I'm off, please feel free to self-organize :)
I'd happy to send the Friday update email until you're back.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development
Some ideas
that we've discussed in the past could use some more discussions. For example:
- Configuration management
- Sharing playbooks with kolla
- Kubernetes based jobs
- What's there?
- What can be shared?
Going to add these points to the etherpad,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
sig
;
proposal and produce a new patchset, or abandon it since we pretty much
already implemented the described change.
I actually did already (probably seconds after you sent this email) :P
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/459848/
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP
the message is that there are cases of leaderless teams this time
around and there's a process we can, should, and will follow.
Thanks for the clarifications, Anita. Thanks for the hard work on the elections,
Kendall.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-tripleo.html#one
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http
On 30/07/17 08:08 -0700, James E. Blair wrote:
Thanks to the following people whose changes are included in this
release:
Jim Rollenhagen
Kevin Benton
Masayuki Igawa
Matthew Thode
Thank you all! <3 Gertty
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signat
still needs to incorporate feedback in the "Drop TC meetings"
proposal and produce a new patchset, or abandon it since we pretty much
already implemented the described change.
ditto! :D
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP
It may be in the future.
The reality is that we depend on INI files now and we will for the forseable
future so the work has to be done anyway.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP sig
validation to this module (check the keys actually
exist, the types are valid, etc) based on the YAML schema that can be generated
with oslo-config-gen now.
I'll reach out again as asoon as I have something to show on this front.
Thanks again for your work,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
/kolla.2017-07-19-16.00.log.html
[1] https://github.com/flaper87/oslo-config-ansible
[2] https://github.com/ansible/ansible-kubernetes-modules/pull/4
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 17/07/17 14:05 +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Thanks for all the feedback so far. This is one of the things I appreciate the
most about this community, Open conversations, honest feedback and will to
collaborate.
I'm top-posting to announce that we'll have a joint meeting with the Kolla team
Hey folks,
Based on the outcome of this thread, I've submitted this resolution to allow
teams to host meetings outside meeting channels. Please, comment and review :)
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/485117/
Flavio
On 26/06/17 10:37 +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Hey Y'all,
Not so long ago
/afdd11b9a22ecca70962a4637d89ad50b7ded2e5/ansible/roles/mariadb/tasks/start.yml#L1-L16
+1 This is why I think there's still room for collaboration and we can re-use
several of the existing things. I don't think everything would have to be
written from scratch.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
anding Glare's goals, plan,
current state, etc. is extremely important.
Enjoy your time off,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for u
On 17/07/17 09:47 -0400, James Slagle wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote:
Thanks for all the feedback so far. This is one of the things I appreciate
the
most about this community, Open conversations, honest feedback and will to
collaborate.
I
g into using scenario004 this week. I was traveling
last week so wasn't looking at it.
Awesome! Thanks, Derek.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mai
On 14/07/17 08:08 -0700, Emilien Macchi wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 2:17 AM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote:
Greetings,
As some of you know, I've been working on the second phase of TripleO's
containerization effort. This phase if about migrating the docker based
deploymen
and how/if it makes sense to keep exploring the path described in
the email below.
Flavio
On 14/07/17 11:17 +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
As some of you know, I've been working on the second phase of TripleO's
containerization effort. This phase if about migrating the docker based
deploy
.
Please reconsider. I'd be happy to talk with you more if you want.
Let's talk, that's the whole point of this thread.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development
On 14/07/17 17:26 +0200, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote:
On 14.07.2017 11:17, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
As some of you know, I've been working on the second phase of TripleO's
containerization effort. This phase if about migrating the docker based
deployment onto Kubernetes.
These phase
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http
exactly is failing and how the glance team
can help?
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ
as soon as the rest
of the work starts to shape out.
Thanks for the email,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions
On 11/07/17 19:21 -0500, Monty Taylor wrote:
On 07/11/2017 06:47 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 11/07/17 14:20 +0300, Mikhail Fedosin wrote:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Monty Taylor
<mord...@inaugust.com> wrote:
On 07/10/2017 04:31 PM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote:
Third, all these chang
Despite this not being my preferred option, I definitely prefer it over the
"compatible" client library.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development M
need to wrap up the goals (selecting the two and deferring the
others). Who is up for discussing those items at our usual meeting slot
time on Tuesday ?
Was out last Friday but here I am now. I'll be there.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 03/07/17 11:04 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2017-07-03 16:11:44 +0200:
On 03/07/17 13:58 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>Flavio Percoco wrote:
>> Sometimes I wonder if we still need to maintain a Wiki. I guess some
>> projects still use
On 03/07/17 13:58 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Flavio Percoco wrote:
Sometimes I wonder if we still need to maintain a Wiki. I guess some
projects still use it but I wonder if the use they make of the Wiki could be
moved
somewhere else.
For example, in the TC we use it for the Agenda but I
e done it, including
Thierry. I wonder how many of the currently hosted teams feel they need
menotring.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not
sh working on the vision, and take a few more steps on this area
before we do any other major change in the community. That way we can measure
whether the changes we're discussing serve such vision.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP
es in and easily clean up.
That said, I agree, wiki is still a wiki.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: op
e their own channels instead.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org
On 27/06/17 18:22 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2017-06-26 15:27:21 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote:
Flavio Percoco wrote:
> [...]
> Not being able to easily ping someone during a meeting is kind
> of a bummer but I'd argue that assuming someone is in the
> meeting channel a
to the governance repo and let the
discussion begin:
https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/new-projects-requirements.html
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack
pload it to galaxy, package it, etc. Distributing ansible modules is a bit
painful right now and you end up adding them as roles in the playbook for the
modules to be loaded.
I'm about to work on a prototype and I'll use option #1 and perhaps we can
discuss further the option #2.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio
* discussions.
So, should we let teams to host IRC meetings in their own channels? Thoughts?
Flavio
[0] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-December/108360.html
[1] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/#office-hours
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP
y we could also make this work in cgit too and we
won't need something that is github specific. These badges can be used for
documentation too.
Here's Glance's example:
https://github.com/openstack/glance#team-and-repository-tags
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Descri
g "OPEN stack" as if we weren't being open (enough?) and I
think I'm failing to see why you think that. Could you please elaborate more?
What you're describing seems to be the current status.
Flavio
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)
____
From:
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi
hey know the exposed flavors serve their needs at a high
level and they can now focus on their specific needs.
So, do you really think it's just a set of flavors and it doesn't really matter
how those flavors got there?
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Descri
to the regular core team.
Flavio
[0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474604/
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
I've been trying to spend some time doing reviews there. I will continue to do
so as long as it is needed/useful.
Awesome, thanks a bunch! I'll propose adding you as well.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
On 13/06/17 09:50 -0500, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 13/06/17 10:49 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Quick attempt at a summary of the discussion so far, with my questions:
* Short-term, Glance needs help to stay afloat
- Sean volunteered to help
- but glance needs to add core reviewers to get stuff
for people to grasp the
concept because the naming that was used is poor and, to be honest, it feels
like it came out from an analogy without properly considering the impact it
would have in the community.
Over-communicating won't get rid of surprises but sometimes the problem is in
the message and not th
to stop considering it a part of "OpenStack"
proper and make it a hosted project. It can of course continue its
existence as an unofficial project hosted on OpenStack infrastructure.
Thoughts ?
+1 to change Fuel* status
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.
understand what the difference between big-tent and
official project is and the name change won't help much with this problem, I
reckon.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
Open
ge
* Have a different documentation theme for hosted projects (?)
I'm not super happy with these ideas but I'm throwing them out there hoping that
we can brainstorm a bit on how we can do this and whether this is something we
really want/need to do.
ughtful decision.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017, 19:47 Mikhail Fedosin <mfedo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 12/06/17 23:20 +0300, Mikhail Fedosin wrote:
>>
>>> My opinion is that Glance stagn
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017, 19:25 Mike Perez <thin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 16:01 Jun 12, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> > On 12/06/17 23:20 +0300, Mikhail Fedosin wrote:
> > > My opinion is that Glance stagnates and it's really hard to implement
> new
> > > features
y
help now. It may be something we want to think about in the future (and this is
not the first time I say this) but what you're proposing will be an expensive
distraction from the real problem.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On 12/06/17 15:37 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 06/12/2017 03:20 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Could you please elaborate more on why you think switching code bases is
going
to solve the current problem? In your email you talked about Glance's
over-engineered code as being the thing driving people
ich it kinda managed to
avoid last year.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...
On 12/06/17 09:13 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 06/09/2017 01:07 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Would it be possible to get help w/ reviews from folks from teams like
nova/cinder/keystone? Any help is welcomed, of course, but I'm trying to
think
about teams that may be familiar with the Glance code
On 12/06/17 10:07 +0200, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote:
On 09.06.2017 18:51, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 8:07 AM Doug Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com
<mailto:d...@doughellmann.com>> wrote:
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2017-06-08 22:28:05 +:
p://stackalytics.com/?module=glance-group=marks
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/466684/
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 11:30 AM Britt Houser (bhouser)
wrote:
> How does confd run inside the container? Does this mean we’d need some
> kind of systemd in every container which would spawn both confd and the
> real service? That seems like a very large architectural change.
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 8:07 AM Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2017-06-08 22:28:05 +:
>
> > Unless I'm missing something, to use confd with an OpenStack deployment
> on
> > k8s, we'll have to do something like this:
> >
> > * Deploy
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017, 19:14 Doug Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2017-06-08 18:27:51 +0200:
> > On 08/06/17 18:23 +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> > >On 07/06/17 12:04 +0200, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote:
> > >>On 06
Flavio
> Regards
> -steve
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com>
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Date: Thursday, June 8, 2017 at 9
this patch. The patch, of course, works in my local environment
;)
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: ope
1 - 100 of 1094 matches
Mail list logo