Re: [Opm] re H2 storage notes from the August 2022 Summit

Hi Rhod, I just tested the link, and it works for me. Do note that it is a .pptx file, so you may need to download it before you open it. Cheers, Alf Fra: Opm på vegne av Rhod Phillips Sendt: onsdag 6. september 2023 19:18 Til: opm@opm-project.org Emne:

Re: [Opm] Question About Pressure-Dependent Permeability

://github.com/OPM/opm-simulators/issues/3501 Cheers, Alf Fra: Opm på vegne av Alf Birger Rustad Sendt: søndag 5. september 2021 23:06 Til: Stian Mydland ; opm@opm-project.org Emne: Re: [Opm] Question About Pressure-Dependent Permeability Hi Stian, Seems this one

Re: [Opm] Question About Pressure-Dependent Permeability

Hi Stian, Seems this one got a bit lost in vacation, so sorry for late answer. There are to my knowledge no current plans to implement pressure dependent transmissibility or permeability. We follow a patches are welcome policy, so contributions are welcome. Cheers, Alf -Original

[Opm] Deprecating GCC 7 and Ubuntu 18.04 for Flow

Dear community, During recent development, the need for bumping the minimum version of GCC from version 7 to version 8 surfaced. The only supported platform affected is Ubuntu 18.04. This means that if we move on to deprecate GCC 7, it will not be possible to build the opm-simulators and

Re: [Opm] Suggestion: new debug configuration

I second your support for a new keyword. Currently, the DBG-file has become less useful due to the amount of information emitted. I have no opinion on implementation details, but my suggestions for the overall functionality is the following: -printing something useful sounds sensible, even if

Re: [Opm] BSD packaging

Hi Evan, There is no usage on BSD afaik, and I am not sure how easy it is to get all dependencies installed and linked there. There are Mac users on Flow, so it typically compiles, and patches to keep supporting clang on Mac are usually well received. These days I would assume Resinsight

Re: [Opm] How do I start contributing with code to OPM?

Hi Henry, You will find information on how to contribute on the wiki, here: https://wiki.opm-project.org/index.php?title=Main_Page#Developer_Information Genereally speaking, e-mail is still a great way to reach out to people. If you want to discuss your ideas, posting them here on the mailing

[Opm] Wiki operational

Dear community, Thanks to Cintia and Kristin, we have finally gotten our wiki back into shape. Learning from the vandalism we experienced, it is now a private wiki, so contributors need to be accepted before contributing. To get started you need to register again. Please check your spam folder

Re: [Opm] CPR and Find Facility

heers, Alf Fra: Opm på vegne av Wilkinson, David Sendt: søndag 30. august 2020 22:34 Til: Alf Birger Rustad ; opm@opm-project.org Emne: [Opm] CPR and Find Facility Hi Alf, Thank you for your response. Your suggested command for running CPR from the command-

Re: [Opm] OPM Query - From a New User

This makes getting best value from this large manual extremely difficult! Am I missing something here and is there a solution? Grateful for advice on any of the above. Thanks for the tip regarding MINPV…. Kind regards, Dave From: Alf Birger Rustad mailto:a...@equinor.com>> Sent: 29 Au

Re: [Opm] OPM Query - From a New User

Hi David, Only phone available now, so short answer. CPR keyword is ignored because the implementation in Flow is immature. Use it like this: $ flow DECK.DATA --use-cpr You can also force usage of TUNING with command line parameter. See all parameters with: $ flow -h Flow supports MINPV and

Re: [Opm] Rel Perm measurements with FLOW

. Flow_ebos still lacks functionality found in Flow, and the numerics is less tested. BTW, you forgot to cc the mailing list. Re-added it in this e-mail. Cheers, Alf -Original Message- From: Lezin Galibert Sent: mandag 10. august 2020 09:55 To: Alf Birger Rustad Subject: Re: Rel Perm

Re: [Opm] Rel Perm measurements with FLOW

Hi Lezin, The short answer is yes, and there are multiple ways of doing it. Unfortunately, Flow does not support setting boundary conditions on inlet nor outlet directly, so you will need to set up wells to mimick inflow and outflow. However, patches are welcome if anybody is up to the task.

Re: [Opm] Command line options help

Hi Kenneth, The command line options are deliberately made very flexible. This means that you can add a command line option locally in the code. Have a look at my recent PR to see how I changed three defaults: https://github.com/OPM/opm-simulators/pull/2669 When you run a simulation, all

Re: [Opm] File formats

consider looking into Parquet which at least is a much newer format than HDF5 Here is an extensive file-format comparison: https://indico.cern.ch/event/613842/contributions/2585787/attachments/1463230/2260889/pivarski-data-formats.pdf On 5/18/20 5:51 PM, Alf Birger Rustad wrote: > Dear commu

[Opm] File formats

Dear community, We are at a cross roads with respect to file formats, and I hope you are motivated to help us arrive at the best solution. We need better load-on-demand performance for summary files than what is currently possible with the default Eclipse format for summary files. Currently

Re: [Opm] Cell Convergence Debugging

Hi Tony, Generally speaking, convergence issues are challenging regardless which simulator you are using. It is usually triggered by something in the data set. Hence, looking for culprits in the data set is a general advice. If you want to keep the data set unchanged, and play with numerical

Re: [Opm] Surface tension in opm-upscaling

Hi Lezin, Please see the wiki for documentation: https://wiki.opm-project.org/index.php?title=Upscaling_relative_permeability_in_capillary_limit The unit is dynes/cm. Cheers, Alf Fra: Opm på vegne av Lezin Galibert Sendt: fredag 21. februar 2020 11:08 Til:

Re: [Opm] Dependencies revisited

Good point, but do we really want to support three generations of Ubuntu LTS? Personally, I think that is too much. Cheers, Alf -Original Message- From: Opm On Behalf Of Atgeirr Rasmussen Sent: tirsdag 28. januar 2020 10:00 To: opm@opm-project.org Subject: Re: [Opm] Dependencies

Re: [Opm] Hydraulic Fracture Modelling

Hi Patricia, I am a bit unsure how you envision the fractured well modelled in Flow. Resinsight already has support for it using well completions: https://resinsight.org/wells-and-completions/ There is to my knowledge no funding available to work on this in Flow at the moment, so the usual

Re: [Opm] Can't find opm-simulators on Ubuntu 18.10

Hi Abdelmoumen, Looking at the ppa: https://launchpad.net/~opm/+archive/ubuntu/ppa I only find packages for Xenial and Bionic, i.e., the long term support releases 16.04 and 18.04. Best, Alf Fra: Opm på vegne av bacetti abdelmoumen Sendt: lørdag 30. november

Re: [Opm] Steady state upscaling

Hi Lezin, I believe the closest thing to documentation is found here: https://wiki.opm-project.org/index.php?title=Using_Steadystate_test_implicit You will find additional information in the first paper in the PhD thesis of Lars: https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/handle/11250/2503528 Good

[Opm] Update: Minimum version of dependencies after new release

Hi again, While everybody on the mailing list expresses support for upping versions of dependencies, it turns out there is a significant number of developers that will be bitten. Hence, we do not rush the minimum versions of dependencies right after release. Instead we will allow those of you

Re: [Opm] [Offtopic] Problem with mails via mailinglist

Thanks for reporting! It seems related to mime settings in mailman. Hopefully fixed now, please report if there are still any issues. For instance, the message you linked to should be displayed correctly now: https://opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/2019-January/002656.html Cheers, Alf

Re: [Opm] Large Models for OPM Flow

___ Opm mailing list Opm@opm-project.org https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] about opm

Hi Lorenzo, I can only give you my take on it, others will most probably have differing perspectives. OPM and Dumux have close relations. Large parts of the reservoir simulator code in OPM is based on Dumux, and both projects have a preference for using Dune for grid and linear algebra. Dumux

Re: [Opm] MPI Parallel OPM Flow - SPE 10 Model 2 Hangs

Hi Mohamad, I just ran the first time steps of this case with Red Had 6 and OpenMPI, both with one and with four MPI processes. It works over here. I am running on a binary compiled from git yesterday, so I have not checked the release version of flow. So at this point, simply sharing that

Re: [Opm] Opm Digest, Vol 33, Issue 5

Hi David, Just ran a test over here on Red Hat 6. The case runs, but memory consumption seems to be in the order of 5GB. Are you sure your VM has enough memory? Cheers, Alf From: Opm On Behalf Of David Baxendale (Private) Sent: 27. september 2018 02:56 To: opm@opm-project.org Subject: Re:

Re: [Opm] Low Sanility WaterFlooding

Hi Axel, Sorry, low salinity flooding is not supported, and there are no plans to support it. The usual "patches are welcome" applies though. Cheers, Alf Fra: Opm på vegne av Axel Dorian PIEPI TOKO Sendt: mandag 17. september 2018 07.49.01 Til:

[Opm] Jenkins up and running

Dear community, Jenkins was successfully updated yesterday, and seems to have been running well the twenty four hours since. Please report if you have any issues. Thank you for your patience, Alf Rustad --- The information

Re: [Opm] Guidelines for running an Eclipse model on OPM-Flow

Hi Claus, It seems you already know the answer to your question. You need to use keywords supported by OPM as outlined in the manual. The opm-data and opm-tests repositories contain many example input decks that are supported. Basically, you need to remove unsupported keywords from the deck,

[Opm] Scheduled maintenance done

Dear OPM community, Scheduled maintenance is now done, and all services seems to be up and running as they should. Please inform us if you are experiencing any problems. Best regards, Alf Rustad From: Opm [mailto:opm-boun...@opm-project.org] On Behalf Of Alf Birger Rustad Sent: 28. mai 2018 13

[Opm] Scheduled maintenance

Dear OPM community, Our needs are growing, and we need to upgrade one of our servers to a more powerful machine. In doing so, we need to reboot the machine hosting our home page, mailing list, wiki and Red Hat packages. Hence, we do expect some downtime on all these services tomorrow, but

Re: [Opm] OPM Flow RedHat 7 Binary Package Build with MPI Support

Hi Mohamad, As Arne Morten says, you will need to tell Red Hat what MPI version to use. The way this is done is by first making the module command available. You achieve this by the following command: . /usr/share/Modules/init/bash Now you can query for installed modules with: module avail

Re: [Opm] (no subject)

I meant to say, Red Hat packages do *not* have MPI support :-) Fra: Opm <opm-boun...@opm-project.org> på vegne av Alf Birger Rustad <a...@statoil.com> Sendt: 15. april 2018 22:53:02 Til: Atgeirr Rasmussen; opm@opm-project.org Emne: Re: [Opm] (no subje

Re: [Opm] (no subject)

Please note that the Red Hat packages do have MPI support. You will need to compile from source, and to get load balancing, you will need to also compile and link in zoltan. Cheers, Alf Fra: Opm på vegne av Atgeirr Rasmussen

Re: [Opm] Problem with installing flow on Ubuntu 16.04

You probably have a network issue. Some proxy settings maybe? You can try to install from another network connection (e.g., tethering from you cell-phone), and it should work. Cheers, Alf Fra: Opm på vegne av lopadren ddd

[Opm] Scheduled maintenance

Dear community, We need to update some of our servers, so some downtime is to be expected this week. Jenkins is not affected, but our home page, wiki, mailinglist, Red Hat packages and Debian packages are. Our apologies for any inconvenience. Best, Alf Rustad

Re: [Opm] Problem with installing python-ert.ecl

Hi Artyom, I am afraid that tutorial needs to be updated. If it was written today it would use Resinsight, since Resinsight now supperts plotting the curves in the summary files. Install resinsight from the packages, and open the case there. Resinsight has excellent online documentation.

Re: [Opm] Problems accessing Redhat packages?

Yum may need you to set the proxy server. I believe it uses port 80. Cheers, Alf Fra: Opm på vegne av Joakim Hove Sendt: 7. november 2017 11:38:04 Til: opm@opm-project.org Emne: [Opm] Problems accessing Redhat

Re: [Opm] Who sets MODULE_ROOT when he/she calls CMake?

Personally I have never used OPM_COMMON_ROOT, so I am not sure exactly what it does. Hence, there may be some functionality here I am unaware of. With that disclaimer, is it not better to just use opm_common_DIR directly instead? It is a standard location variable (independent of OPM) with

Re: [Opm] Typical Run-time for SPE10

Fra: Kangqiao Hu <kangqia...@gmail.com> Sendt: 21. august 2017 06:39 Til: Alf Birger Rustad Kopi: Opm@opm-project.org Emne: Re: [Opm] Typical Run-time for SPE10 Thanks Alf for the explanation. If I want to replace the current solver with a custom one, where is a good

Re: [Opm] Typical Run-time for SPE10

Hi Kang, The short answer is that flow does not support running the model yet. The long answer is that SPE10 Model 2 is a two-phase upscaling study, and hence by nature not fond of the preconditioning routines used by default in flow (or some of the commercial simulators for that matter). The

Re: [Opm] Parallel OPM flow simulation

it on a Mac. Sorry, Alf Fra: Kangqiao Hu <kangqia...@gmail.com> Sendt: 7. august 2017 22:42:14 Til: Alf Birger Rustad; Opm@opm-project.org Emne: Re: Parallel OPM flow simulation Thanks Alf for quick reply. Let me try the same in OSX. Thanks. Regards Kang From: Alf

Re: [Opm] Parallel OPM flow simulation

Hi Kang, On OSX I am afraid you are on your own when it comes to MPI. On supported Linux distributions we have MPI enabled binaries packaged, and it is invoked in the standard way with mpirun. Cheers, Alf Fra: Opm på vegne av

Re: [Opm] Help with installation

rred! Note that opm-grid was previously successfully installed. Are you suggesting that the error is on Dune? Andres ----- Original message - From: Alf Birger Rustad <a...@statoil.com> To: Andres Codas Duarte <andresco...@br.ibm.com> Cc: "opm@opm-project.org" &l

Re: [Opm] Help with installation

at the error is on Dune? Andres - Original message ----- From: Alf Birger Rustad <a...@statoil.com> To: Andres Codas Duarte <andresco...@br.ibm.com> Cc: "opm@opm-project.org" <opm@opm-project.org> Subject: SV: [Opm] Help with installation Date: Wed, Aug 2, 2017 1:

Re: [Opm] Help with installation

gust 2017 18:11:40 Kopi: opm@opm-project.org Emne: Re: [Opm] Help with installation I'm on a MacOS Sierra (version 10.12.6). - Original message ----- From: Alf Birger Rustad <a...@statoil.com> To: Andres Codas Duarte <andresco...@br.ibm.com> Cc: "opm@opm-project.org"

Re: [Opm] Help with installation

Hi Andres, Dune 2.4.1 was used with rc1, but 2.3.1 should also work fine. Any other version may be problematic. I am on vacation, so a bit limited abilities to help you. Still, what distribution are you building on? Cheers, Alf Fra: Opm

Re: [Opm] Implementation in OPM framework of salt precipitation phenomena

Dear Paul, I am afraid there are no simple answers to your questions. Generally speaking, I believe we all want a capable fully compositional simulator at some point in time, However, I do not think anybody is in a position to future proof an effort today. Several routes to that end have

Re: [Opm] PRT Files

setting up a virtual machine with everything installed. You will find directions on that here: http://opm-project.org/?page_id=294 Good luck! Alf -Original Message- From: Bob Merrill [mailto:bobmerr...@mersep.com] Sent: 19. desember 2016 13:27 To: Alf Birger Rustad <a...@statoil.com> C

Re: [Opm] PRT Files

sure to greet him from you next time we meet :-) Best, Alf From: bobmerr...@mersep.com [bobmerr...@mersep.com] Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2016 3:06 AM To: Alf Birger Rustad Cc: bobmerr...@mersep.com; opm@opm-project.org Subject: RE: [Opm] PRT Files Dear

Re: [Opm] PRT Files

Hi Bob, Your understanding is correct. We did debug the PAV calculations right before the release, so there might still be some rough edges. Can you please share what version of flow you are using, is it the 2016.10 release or fresh from git? Can you also share what SPE1 deck you are using. Is

Re: [Opm] FW: [Help] Convergence issues - FLOW

Thanks for testing Rohith, we will need to find time to go through your cases. Cheers, Alf From: Opm [opm-boun...@opm-project.org] on behalf of Nair, R. (Rohith) [rohith.n...@tno.nl] Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 1:18 PM To: Alf Birger Rustad; opm@opm-project.org

Re: [Opm] FW: [Help] Convergence issues - FLOW

Hi Rohith, One thing you can try right away is the new switch for ignoring convergence failure for the linear solver. On the command line or in a parameter file you can add: linear_solver_ignoreconvergencefailure=true Cheers, Alf From: Opm

Re: [Opm] Problems compiling the new versionof OPM

Nothing that pops out for me. Basically, I believe it should just work on 15.10. Are you using dune from kubuntu packages? If so, what version is packaged there? As Atgeirr suggests, make sure you start with fresh OPM repositories, any remnants of earlier versions are known to cause cryptic

[Opm] Fwd: Re: Potential Issue with Redhat Repository

Forgot to add mailing list to sender. (Note to self: stop using phone for this type of correspondence) -- Videresendt melding -- Fra: Alf Birger Rustad <a...@statoil.com> Dato: 19. mai 2016 11.41 p.m. Emne: Re: [Opm] Potential Issue with Redhat Repository Til: George

Re: [Opm] Potential Issue with Redhat Repository

Ah, the string Client should be removed from your link path. Sorry, didn't catch that first. Cheers, Alf 19. mai 2016 8.46 p.m. skrev George Shang : To whom it may concern, I'm not sure where emails reporting potential issues should be reported to, and so if this is

Re: [Opm] Potential Issue with Redhat Repository

Hi George, I just checked your link, and it works fine here. I can also access all Red Hat 7 rpm's from the repo. Please cross-check at your end again. Cheers, Alf 19. mai 2016 8.46 p.m. skrev George Shang : To whom it may concern, I'm not sure where emails reporting

Re: [Opm] New opm-repo

11:20 AM To: opm@opm-project.org Subject: Re: [Opm] New opm-repo Hi, On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 08:47:52AM +, Alf Birger Rustad wrote: > Thanks for the announcement! There is one issue that I hope > everybody with informed opinions can contribute to. Today, writing > results is a pe

Re: [Opm] New opm-repo

Thanks for the announcement! There is one issue that I hope everybody with informed opinions can contribute to. Today, writing results is a performance bottleneck flow. Hence, we should find a way for flow to write results asynchronously, i.e., the simulator should not need to wait computing

Re: [Opm] Request of information

Hi Lisi, I am afraid the question is surprisingly complicated to answer. The hexahedrons we calculate volumes for are cells from corner-point grids. In this case we have chosen to calculate the volume similar to what industry standard reservoir simulators do. The actual calculation is not done

[OPM] Open data

Dear OPM community, It is my privilege to announce the opening of the opm-data repository. It has been kept as a private repository due to uncertainties with respect to licensing and copyright. We have now been able to create new versions of SPE1, SPE3, SPE9 and partly SPE10 from their

Re: [OPM] Compiler / boost version

You should have no problems using ggc 5.x. What the 4.8 support means is that developers should not use C++ features newer than what 4.8 supports, since that will break build for all users of Ubuntu LTS. Cheers, Alf 19. juni 2015 19:07 skrev wireless wirel...@tampabay.rr.com følgende: On

Re: [OPM] Improvements(?) in opm-parser

How to handle the situation when the deck asks for something we do not support? Of course a warning is a natural solution; but if we just succumbed to a warning immediately I fear people would generally not even notice, and we would have lost the opportunity for a more principal discussion.

Re: [OPM] Installation sub directories

In Statoil the sibling builds have led to quite a lot of wasted developer time when tracking down link and build problems when building and deploying on Jenkins. Actually, I have not seen issues related to sibling support. Can you share more about the issues are you thinking of? the

Re: [OPM] OPM release 2015.04

Hi Paolo, No parallel option yet, but we are hard at work on it :-) Cheers, Alf From: Opm [opm-boun...@opm-project.org] on behalf of Paolo Orsini [paolo.ors...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 1:21 PM To: Atgeirr Rasmussen Cc: OPM Mailing List Subject:

[OPM] OPM meeting agenda and hotel update

: https://www.atb.no/getfile.php/Filer/Rutetabeller/Vinter2015/AtB_rute_6.pdf A taxi will also get you there of course. As for the agenda March 11-12, we have the following: Wednesday 10:00 - 10:15Coffee 10:15 - 10:30Welcome (Alf Birger Rustad) 10:30 - 11:30Status of simulation

Re: [OPM] OPM Meeting

Hi David, Your participation is noted, looking forward to seeing you! Like I mentioned any hotel in the downtown area will be fine. However, for those who enjoy satying at the same hotel, I recommend Scandic Nidelven. You will fine their web-page here:

[OPM] New repo opm-utilities

Hello everybody, I am guilty of creating yet another repository in opm. Please provide feed-back if you like it or not. We can rename it or even delete it. It is called opm-utilities and currently hosts the python script summaryplot. Right now it is afaik the only tool we have to plot results

Re: [OPM] New repo opm-utilities

python script, tomorrow it may also contain an emacs plugin, putting some pressure on you vi guys ;-) Cheers, Alf 19. nov. 2014 17:41 skrev =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F8rgen_Kvalsvik?= jorge...@stud.ntnu.no følgende: On 2014-11-19 07:27, Alf Birger Rustad wrote: Hello everybody, I am guilty of creating

Re: [OPM] Make issue: git builds of opm-upscaling ( friends) fails - missing version directives in Finddune-cornerpoint.cmake

Hi James, I believe most of your questions have been (at least attempted) answered on the contributions link of the webpage, and the front page of the wiki. http://opm-project.org/contrib.php http://www.opm-project.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page Like most open projects opm is best described as a

Re: [OPM] Grid interface

solution with helper classes is not ideal. Cheers, Alf From: Paolo Orsini [paolo.ors...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 5:01 PM To: Alf Birger Rustad Cc: opm@opm-project.org Subject: Re: [OPM] Grid interface Ok, doing some more browsing I found some

Re: [OPM] Grid interface

discussions on other topics separately. Cheers, Alf wireless wirel...@tampabay.rr.com: On 08/09/14 07:18, Alf Birger Rustad wrote: Hello everybody, Finally we have a reference black-oil simulator coming into shape, but admittedly still some rough edges to iron out. During this effort we

[OPM] Grid interface

Hello everybody, Finally we have a reference black-oil simulator coming into shape, but admittedly still some rough edges to iron out. During this effort we uncovered challenges with our plumbing. The most prominent is perhaps the two grid interfaces cpgrid and unstructered grid. The first is

Re: [OPM] Rename parser?

Hello everybody, I agree, the name should probably be changed to better reflect the repositories content. I also agree that autumn is a better time to revisit the topic :-) Cheers, Alf Joakim Hove jo...@statoil.com: Hello; After reviewing: https://github.com/OPM/opm-core/pull/560 I though

Re: [OPM] Build system updates

updates Hi, On Wednesday 02 July 2014 06:46:39 Alf Birger Rustad wrote: My take on this is that build issues can happen, but then they should be fixed within a day or two. I do hope we can mandate building of PR's prior to merging on the new virtual build server soon though. If we know

Re: [OPM] issue with compiling opm-core

I think we all agree that OPM is (and in my opinions should remain) more on libraries and core functionality, and less on end user applications. I hope we can cater to both, and today we really do. I believe Resinsight and the upscaling codes are firmly positioned in the end-user application

Re: [OPM] Regarding transmissibility multipliers

For the Norne case we only need to support MULTFLT in the GRID section, and it seems supporting using it in SCEDULE is a different ball game, while in EDIT I assume it still can be supported within the parser. Personlally, I am not sure how uncommon it is to use MULTFLT outside of the GRID

Re: [OPM] OPM releases this year

Hello everybody, I strongly support postponing release until we have somewhat landed the current effort with the Norne milestone. Cheers, Alf -Original Message- From: Opm [mailto:opm-boun...@opm-project.org] On Behalf Of Atgeirr Rasmussen Sent: 1. april 2014 10:09 To: OPM Mailing List

Re: [OPM] [opm-core] DUNE dependency

Does OPM target industry prior to academia? Could you please elaborate on that? I am not sure that question makes any sense. The question assumes a conflict, while OPM (at least for me) is very much about bridging gaps between academia and industry. I would rather say that OPM seeks to enable

Re: [OPM] [opm-core] DUNE dependency

I know many people use Eclipse and that you're very much interested in it. However, in my humble opinion, it shouldn't be the center of attention in OPM initiative. I agree. However, we need to relate to reality. Reality is that we would need to replace a vast value chain of software to

Re: [OPM] Use of ERT in Parser?

I am not sure that is a good idea. It depends on what we want to accomplish I guess, and putting restrictive names on projects may end up restricting it unnecessarily in practice. In this case there are two issues. One is do we really want to restrict opm-parser to Eclipse formats? The reason

Re: [OPM] Use of ERT in Parser?

-Original Message- From: Opm [mailto:opm-boun...@opm-project.org] On Behalf Of Andreas Lauser Sent: 27. januar 2014 22:44 To: opm@opm-project.org Subject: Re: [OPM] Use of ERT in Parser? To avoid the wrath of Schlumberger, it's probably a good idea not to do that... I assume you mean

[OPM] Boost version revisited

Hello everybody, It seems we never really landed the Boost version discussion, but we need to settle this now. The need arises in the filesystem part of Boost, where version 2 and 3 are incompatible. Version 3 was introduced in Boost 1.44, but version 2 remained supported up to (and including)

Re: [OPM] Umfpack runtime dependendy is problematic

i consider anything that does not follow standardized procedures to be a stop gap solution, cause it will almost certainly break sooner or later. you refuse (are unable to) follow standardized procedures, and thus you will have to deal with breakage. this sounds like a decent workable hack.