Hmm, AFAIK, it is a Google group, with optionally used mail list
functionality,
like some others, e.g the BRouter group.
The mail list functionality had to be explicitly activated, not sure if on
the group or the account level.
Dne 12. března 2020 5:14:34 A Thompson napsal:
Aaargh. I meant
Aaargh. I meant overestimates not underestimates. Wouldn't it be better if
this were a google group where posts could be edited, rather than a mailing
list archived as google group?
On Thursday, March 12, 2020 at 3:57:45 AM UTC, A Thompson wrote:
>
> As I understand it, the A* algorithm uses a
As I understand it, the A* algorithm uses a heuristic that estimates the
cost of the as-yet unexplored route from a point to the goal. If this
function never underestimates the cost, then the optimal route is
guaranteed to be found.
If we only consider distance as the cost, then the bee-line
I am SHURE many first time users of osmand never use it again just for that
simple reason (as they start with HC1.0)
Am Mittwoch, 11. März 2020 20:32:55 UTC+1 schrieb Xavier:
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 01:46:19PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> if there is a second impatient person sitting
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 01:46:19PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
What I take away is
hc=1.2 does not ever result in any significant routing error (where
error is failure to match 1.0), of course in the cases you tried.
hc=1.3 is almost always non-erroneous, and the time saving from 1.5
to
And forgot to say: For that reason I switch off "use motorways" (and toll
roads like in France) when planning a touristic route.
Harry
Op wo 11 mrt. 2020 om 20:01 schreef Harry van der Wolf :
>
>
> Op wo 11 mrt. 2020 om 19:47 schreef 'ra' via OsmAnd <
> osmand@googlegroups.com>:
>
>> up to 1
Op wo 11 mrt. 2020 om 19:47 schreef 'ra' via OsmAnd :
> up to 1 or 2 years ago "gas saving"/"kraftstoffsparend" was called
> "shortest" - I hope it actually is the same. I love it, not for gas saving,
> but to go along small roads I would never see else. I once travelled like
> that venice >
up to 1 or 2 years ago "gas saving"/"kraftstoffsparend" was called
"shortest" - I hope it actually is the same. I love it, not for gas saving,
but to go along small roads I would never see else. I once travelled like
that venice > berlin, very nice, if you take the time. or you quit the
Thanks! I'll try it.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 10:49 AM Harry van der Wolf
wrote:
>
>
> Op wo 11 mrt. 2020 om 17:07 schreef Bart Eisenberg <
> barteisenb...@gmail.com>:
>
>> I've experimented with the Measure distance feature, but never really
>> used it for navigation--so I've not mentioned it
Op wo 11 mrt. 2020 om 17:07 schreef Bart Eisenberg :
> I've experimented with the Measure distance feature, but never really used
> it for navigation--so I've not mentioned it in a video. But I'm
> interested: what do you see as its main uses and advantages?
>
>
>
It used to be just what its
What I take away is
hc=1.2 does not ever result in any significant routing error (where
error is failure to match 1.0), of course in the cases you tried.
hc=1.3 is almost always non-erroneous, and the time saving from 1.5 to
1.3 is never important
I don't 100% follow the "need 1.2 to
The two routes (Fastest Route) that did have differences between an hc=1.2
and an hc=1.5 I did again with an hc=1.3
heuristic coefficient distance
(calculated) time
(hours minutes) calculation time
minutes/seconds) Remarks
Zwolle, Nl - Valkenburg, Nl last part smaller roads
hc=1.0 239km 2h24m 36s
Thanks for that explanation. Is the new Direct-to-point navigation type
(see https://osmand.net/blog/osmand-3-6-released), which the blog says is
for marine use, also for circumventing barriers? What are the advantages
of each?
On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 11:25:07 PM UTC-7, danilo.baggini
I've experimented with the Measure distance feature, but never really used
it for navigation--so I've not mentioned it in a video. But I'm
interested: what do you see as its main uses and advantages?
On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 1:56:23
AM UTC-7, Harry van der Wolf wrote:
>
>
>
> Op di 10
>@danilo.baggini Yes make a lot of sense for a boat.
Thanks for that explanation. Is the new Direct-to-point navigation type
(see https://osmand.net/blog/osmand-3-6-released), which the blog says is
for marine use, also for circumventing barriers? What are the advantages
of each?
>@Harry:
> The big problem (as I see it) is that OsmAnd can't calculate long routes.
> The answer is: "You have to add waypoints", and that is also what OsmAnd
> suggests.
Reminds me that I wonder if OsmAnd (or other routers) use some form of
"planning": rather than do a recursive search from start to
Op wo 11 mrt. 2020 om 14:25 schreef 'ra' via OsmAnd :
> superb, harry! was that done with setting FASTEST route or ENERGY SAVING?
> without being able to award you ANY price (besides a beer to be picked up
> here ;-) I would so very much like to see THESE very interesting
> differences. and to
Sorry, it should be
P1 - > D2 - > D1 - > P2
Helmut Jarausch schrieb am Mi., 11. März 2020, 12:29:
> Here is a problem which I can't solve and which is related to straight
> line navigation.
> You notice a distant fire and you want to find where it is located.
> On my old Garmin device there is
superb, harry! was that done with setting FASTEST route or ENERGY SAVING?
without being able to award you ANY price (besides a beer to be picked up
here ;-) I would so very much like to see THESE very interesting
differences. and to the above with the added setting AVOID HIGHWAYS - we
all
This is a spin-off of the original topic.
I just did a number of route calculations for the different heuristic
coefficients being hc=1.0 (default OsmAnd), hc=1.2 and hc=1.5
I took the routing.xml, copied the car routing profile out of it and made
my own routing.xml (the earlier mentioned
Here is a problem which I can't solve and which is related to straight line
navigation.
You notice a distant fire and you want to find where it is located.
On my old Garmin device there is a feature called Sight'N Go.
One aims at the distant object and presses Enter. Then one can create a
distant
For each segment - 3.7
On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 12:16:01 PM UTC+3, Harry van der Wolf wrote:
>
>
>
> Op wo 11 mrt. 2020 om 10:08 schreef Eugene zmeu >:
>
>> We plan to improve Measure Distance tool (
>> https://github.com/osmandapp/Osmand/issues/7751) and add this tool for
>> iOS version
Op wo 11 mrt. 2020 om 10:08 schreef Eugene zmeu :
> We plan to improve Measure Distance tool (
> https://github.com/osmandapp/Osmand/issues/7751) and add this tool for
> iOS version soon.
>
> Nice. The different navigation types can already be used in 3.6.3 on
Android.
Harry
--
You received
We plan to improve Measure Distance tool
(https://github.com/osmandapp/Osmand/issues/7751) and add this tool for iOS
version soon.
On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 11:56:23 AM UTC+3, Harry van der Wolf wrote:
>
>
>
> Op di 10 mrt. 2020 om 16:30 schreef Bart Eisenberg >:
>
>>
>> I'm interested,
Op di 10 mrt. 2020 om 16:30 schreef Bart Eisenberg :
>
> I'm interested, long term, in doing some videos beyond OsmAnd and would
> appreciate your thoughts.
>
Still focusing on OsmAnd: You created the "Creating, previewing and
navigating hiking routes with OsmAnd
Yes make a lot of sense for a boat.
I will explain:You define a route, a straighr line to the destination, but
there is an island and the boat obviously MUST avoid the island, there is fog,
a lateral current shift the boat from original route.1 the navigation sistem
recalculate a new route ro
26 matches
Mail list logo
