Hi all,
MZ-Ms in Australia are sold only with Sigma lenses, but
I was wondering if the two-segment meter works with this range
of lenses. According to the local distributor's website:
Exposure Meter
With FA-, F-, or A-series lenses: TTL multi(2)-segment
metering,
Minox 35 GT!!! just got mine and its perfect :-))
Daphne
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
If the Sigma lenses have the A setting on the aperture
ring, it works with 2 segment meter. (not 100% sure
though). I suppose they will have it, otherwise you
won't be able to use sutter priority mode nor progam
mode.
However, I am not sure if I prefer two-segment to
center weighted. At least it
Michael,
If that Sigma lens is autofocus, then it certainly complies with
Pentax KF mount and will enable multi-segment metering. If it's a
Sigma manual focus, dismount it and look at the mount. If you see an
array of electric contacts, then it's KA compatible and fully supports
Yes, indeed! How about the FA 20-35mm f/4. A really great lens
for shooting the grandeur of mountain landscapes.
Len
- ---
finally a sensible answer. I'll repeat the question for the others and
give more info.
I'll be at Kala Patar 5500m altitude (ie 18000ft for the yankees).
Everest basecamp
Flavio Minelli has informed me, and asked me to pass on to the
group, the news of the birth of his and Laura's son, Valerio.
Apparently, the little guy had a difficult time of it during the
process of being born.
Hell, here is what Flavio had to say about it:
This little guy is making our life
Hi,
Have anybody manual of Pentax MZ-5n(3) in electronic form ( for example
PDF, DOC, HTML etc...) ?
Or link to download ...
Thanks Alex
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax
Hi Conrad,
[Snicker]
(Discussion about large aperture lenses and accurate focusing)
[Snak]
Another point to consider is that the camera might be faulty.
If the mirror is not accurately placed (and we are talking
_small_ fractions of a millimetre here) then what you see in the
viewfinder is not
Hi Shel,
I use an Olympus XA-2. It's very small, has a sliding cover for the 35mm
f3.5 Zuiko, built-in lens which means it really does fit in a pocket, has
a fully de-mountable flash, 3-setting focus, ISO dial-in from 25-800,
self-timer, very quiet electronic shutter. Where I go, it goes.
I just got back from a cycling trip in the French Pyrenees.
Not quite the Himalayas, maximum we reached was 2000m. Lots of mountains though.
I took my MX and 40mm lens. I also took a 24mm lens which I rarely used. Odd, really
as I'd expected to use it much more for the spectacular views we had!
Hi!
Please look for the spring loaded ball type information contacts at the
outer
metallic reem of Sigma lense. If you don't find a single contact there,
it is equivalent to M-series lenses made by Pentax.
By the way, what lense you have purchased. Is it 28 - 70 f/2.8-4?
Wish you all the best.
Thanks! (Guess I was just impatient...)
- Original Message -
From: Peter Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 9:00 AM
Subject: Re: FYI
Usually Pentax US has older manuals for somewhat less, last I knew it was
about $4.00 for shipping and
Frank Wajer wrote:
I'll be at Kala Patar 5500m altitude (ie 18000ft for the yankees).
Everest basecamp is at 5700m (19000ft), but there is no view of Everest
from basecamp. So I'll be IN the Himalaya not in Kathmandu taking pictures
from Everest with a 1mm lens.
I've never been higher
Hi all!
Recently, I was taking some shots in a function (The organizers of the
function requested me to photograph the activities in the function). In
the question hour session, I was photographing a young boy who was asking
question. He was about 8 meters away from me and I was using PENTAX
My understanding was that redeye has nothing to do with how close you
are to the subject. Rather how close the flash is to the lens. Let me
explain:
Redeye is caused by the flash reflecting off the retina of the eye. The
flash is reflected at 180 degrees to the angle which it entered the eye.
A scroll of mail from dosk [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 22 May 2001
15:07:02 -0400
Read it? y
I'm mostly concerned about the changable options. (Such as spot metering
instead of CWt'ed, rewind film leader out or in, etc...) On the PZ-1(p)
these can easily be changed by the camera owner. But specs
Tom wrote:
I've never been higher then 14k, so maybe I don't know what I'm talking
about, but I'm thinking changing lenses might be a pain in ass.
Absolutely. You have to be very determined to even take out the
camera in the middle of a serious effort. Besides, every additional
maneuver
Hi guys
I am looking at buying some k-mount extension tubes. I am wondering if there
is any difference in the performance of different brands? As if there like
the screw mount ones i have seen then there is no glass in the tube.
Are there any other cons of extension tubes?
Also what sort of
Any truckers in the group? :)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
There is none.
If you want detail, use 100mm or longer.
If you want content, use a 24-40 range lens.
If you want to remember what you see, use your 50mm.
If you don't care, use a Canon. :)
Collin
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
-
This
Flavio, congratulation and good luck.
23 years ago my wife and I went trough the same situation. Now 23 years
later, my daughter gives me headaches.
Jeff Tokayer
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001
Does a minivan count?
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: Collin Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 9:26 AM
Subject: Re: EB: here's one for Texas
Any truckers in the group? :)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Skip, Why not go to the Pentax Canada web site, get their help e-mail
address and see if they have what you need. The Pentax cameras Canada
distributes carry the same lettering as Europe and Japan.
DG
At 01:04 AM 5/23/01 -0400, you wrote:
Well, thanks for responding with info about Boz's
I took my MX to some bike trips and found that the
best way to carry it is in a special bag - kind of a
small fanny pack + shoulder strap. Mine is made by
Hama and has room for camera w/big wideangle or short
tele or zoom, 2 film rolls and filters.
How rare is a black ME Super? Boz's site confirms that it was made, but I
can't recall seeing an ad for one until now:
ME-Super (black) c/w 50mm £120 at London Camera Exchange in
Farehams second hand stock list.([EMAIL PROTECTED]) or
http://www.lcegroup.co.uk (though stock is not listed
Ayash,
You understand that red-eye because you show the illumination of the red
blood vessels at the rear of the eyeball in your photo. You can do this at
any distance if your flash and lens are close enough. It is actually easier
to get/have red-eye with long lenses because the effective
I don't know how rare they are, but I had one for a while before
selling it to another list member. I recall that, when I bought my
first ME S (which was new) there were numerous black models on
display along with the silver.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How rare is a black ME Super? Boz's site
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How rare is a black ME Super? Boz's site confirms that it was made, but I
can't recall seeing an ad for one until now:
They were reasonably common in the Toronto area shops when I went on my
emergency camera purchasing excursion not too long ago (the one that
Black ME Supers weren't particularly rare when they were made but ones in
good condition are kind of rare now because the black finish wasn't very
durable.
That would be a good price if the camera is in good shape. If it's got any
significant paint wear on the trim or any brassing on the top or
How big is your pocket?
How big is your pocketbook?
:-)
Paul M. Provencher
(being impertinent)
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 7:30 PM
To: Pentax List
Subject: Pocketable Camera
I'm looking for a small, pocketable,
I can tell you about the screw mount lens:
For the focal length it is light and very handholdable (at speeds about
1/250 if you are good); Very sharp, fast enough, easy to focus; typical
screw-mount construction (high quality);
minimal flare/ghost images
Here are some photos made hand-held:
I see them on ebay at times. I bought a black ME Super for parts, the
description had no picture and didn't mention it was black, so I really
lucked out. Shutter was stuck, gave it a boost with my finger, and off she
goes. Works good. Only problem with it, the shutter release button has to
be
Hi Dale ...
If there is an adjustment, I don't know about it. Over time I've
had five ME Supers, and a couple had the characteristic you observed
on yours. I've found that the soft release, designed for the leica,
fits the ME S perfectly, and allows for much easier shutter
operation if you're
I think that someone from Texas should jump all over this one.
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1239107821
Brent from Auburn, AL
Looks like a 'bama item to me, Brent.
Shoot naw. We ain't got no use fer dems down hear in the heart of Dixie. No
one hear wears axessories like
Provencher, Paul M. wrote:
How big is your pocket?
Depends on the shirt I'm wearing. I'd like to be able to carry the
camera in a small shirt pocket or in my jeans.
How big is your pocketbook?
My pocketbook is huge, although now it's pretty close to empty. I
don't want to spend more than
Try Cosco. They used to be very cheap for these things.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Cameron Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: May 23, 2001 12:38 PM
Subject: Batteries
Anyone got some good prices on 2cr5 and AA lithiums in Canada
or North
America?
Cameron
Use mirror lockup. The KX is incredibly noisy with the mirror down, with
it up all I hear is a click when the shutter is 1/125-1/1000. As a matter
of fact, I wouldn't be surprised if the KX and K2 are both the noisiest and
quietest Pentaxes, depending on if the mirror is locked up or not :)
I see them on eBay too, usually there is one for sale among about 50 chrome
ME Supers. I think it's cousin, the black ME, is a lot less common.
Interesting that during that time that the MV (the most basic model) and
the LX were both black cameras, while all the ones in between were chrome.
Forgot to mention, all of these do violate your no autofocus, but a few
offer both.
Have fun,
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery
If I were a betting person, I would bet that the below model would be an
upgrade of the ZX-5n
Bill, KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You may have heard it before but Pentax is now openly admitting that they
will release a camera above the MZ-S and one below it. No time frame is
given but I guess they
Hi,
she shouldn't have been so stupid as to get out of the car.
I would think the quietest would be the LX, which is a lot quieter
than the MX. The winder is also reasonably quiet. I used my LXs in a
game park in S. Africa. I even photographed elephants with it, and not
one of them trampled me
- Original Message -
From: Todd Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: May 23, 2001 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: LX Sticky Mirror
Interesting. I think Pentax, to fix the sticky mirror, does a
whole CLA to
the camera. He probably just replaced the rubber bumpers.
But hey, if
The Ricoh XR-7/XR-S/Sears KS-2 have it (those 3 are all the same camera).
Sigma also has a camera based of the XR-7 (SA-1 I think), so it might have
it also. Later Ricoh cameras also have it (XR-7MII), but these cameras are
not up to the quality as the earlier cameras like the XR-S.
Check here
Hi Shel,
Paul covered the original compacts very thoroughly. If you are looking for
something of more recent vintage you might want to check out some of these
(all feature exp. compensation, many have adj. diopters, spot metering, and
metal bodies):
Ricoh GR1s, 28mm (Camera Traders Ltd. has
Interesting. I think Pentax, to fix the sticky mirror, does a whole CLA to
the camera. He probably just replaced the rubber bumpers. But hey, if it
works
Todd
At 02:46 PM 5/23/01 EDT, you wrote:
Hello all-
I just thought that I would report to you on a pleasant experience that I
Offer to use one of the escrow services. I will deal with _anyone_ using an ebay
suggested
escrow service, even you Pål, and even if you're selling from the Iceland or some such
out
of the way place. As to this item, I already have an A* 135/1.8. You'll be sorry you
sold
this lens, Pål.
Todd Stanley wrote:
. . . . The MZ series is pretty loud, but I bet if you
got one of those 5 fps MX or LX motor drives going, it would be
even louder.
Even with just the power winder, the M-series cameras are quite
noisy. And when you let the motor drive on an MX run at full
speed
Hi guys,
I've borrowed some gear from work to use for checking the shutter timing of a
K2 that I suspect has problems.
I figured that while I'm at it, I might as well see what the Z-1p is doing. The
problem is that the body won't fire the shutter with the back open and I can't
find any
Pentax does a complete clean, lube and adjust (CLA) and replaces EVERY seal and rubber
baby bumper. So long as the rest of your camera is fine, you got a great deal.
Regards,
Bob...
---
In the carboniferous epoch
we were promised perpetual peace.
They swore if we gave
Bill wrote:
If I were a betting person, I would bet that the below model would be an
upgrade of the ZX-5n
So would I normally but I've been told its a downgrade of the MZ-S (maybe plastic
body, no data imprinting etc..)
This is now openly admitted at Pentax centers in Japan. They have
I wrote:
So would I normally but I've been told its a downgrade of the MZ-S (maybe plastic
body, no data imprinting etc..)
This is now openly admitted at Pentax centers in Japan. They have graphic
representation of Pentax future line-up at display where these two models are
visible.
Some
Bob wrote:
Offer to use one of the escrow services. I will deal with _anyone_ using an ebay
suggested
escrow service, even you Pål, and even if you're selling from the Iceland or some
such out
of the way place.
How does escrow service work?
As to this item, I already have an A* 135/1.8.
Pentax-A 2X-S converter, practically speaking Mint, boxed w/original leather hard
case, strap and manual.
$ 180.
Pål
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
FB-1 (excellent, boxed with manual) + FD-1 (excellent): $230
FE-1 (excellent, boxed with manual): $140
The finders are hardly used and just collecting dust. Prices in US dollars.
Pål
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow
Paul Jones writes:
I am looking at buying some k-mount extension tubes. I am
wondering if there
is any difference in the performance of different brands? As
if there like
the screw mount ones i have seen then there is no glass in the tube.
I don't know if there are differences
On 23 May 2001, at 9:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ayash,
You understand that red-eye because you show the illumination of the red
blood vessels at the rear of the eyeball in your photo.
Which leads me to the question; do cats eyes have green blood vessels?
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
FB-1 (excellent, boxed with manual) + FC-1 (excellent, boxed with manual): $250
FE-1 (excellent, boxed with manual): $140
The finders are hardly used and just collecting dust. Prices in US dollars.
[Its the FC-1 I have for sale above, not the FD-1 as in previous post]
Pål
-
This message
Thanks for everyones replies, i think i'll aim for pentax ones, but if
another brand comes up at a reasnoble price then i'll grab them.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: Provencher, Paul M. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 10:18 AM
Subject: RE:
Hi,
I know you are ment to have a Circular Polarizer on an AF lense, but why?
what will happen if i use a standard one?
Thanks
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users'
Dan,
Thanks for brining the lineup up-to-date. I was unaware that you could get
spot metering on a contemporary compact.
With most the models that you've named have fine lenses and other strong
points, their extensive automation makes them a different breed from the
flexible manual-focus models
The track record is important, so you might want to consider building one
before you sell this lens.
Do you have other items to sell first? If you sell me your MZ-S for $100
I'll give you one point:-)
Frits
I will sell my A* 135/1.8 sometime the next month or so and hope
to receive the usual
Escrow service works like this:
You offer escrow in your terms of payment AND (so they see it) in your description
area.
The buyer pays the fee in exchange for security. A plus for the buyer, is that he can
purchase your lens using his hot plastic. ebay has an area where they discuss
On 23 May 2001, at 18:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The highly regarded 28mm, f/2.8 Ricoh GR1, like the 28/3.5 Olympus XA-4 of
the 1980s, offers full-program exposure only--no program shift. Even if it
allows exposure compensation, you're at the mercy of the program that Ricoh has
built into
Hi,
I'm no doctor (trust me), but isn't it the case that mammalian blood is
not red but blue when it's in the veins? It only turns red when it
oxidises (eg when it comes out of your veins). This would suggest that
red-eye is not a reflection off blood vessels, but off the retina
itself, which is
hi Paul,
the 1.5/75 CZJ is Sonnar design, made originally for Exakta. Quite a good
lens, esp. stopped down. Unfortunately single-coated
AFIK. It should come close or beat the SMC Tak (at least the older, 1.9 Tessar/Sonnar
design, sure), I think g.
The other one, 1.8/80 CZJ
Hi Bob ...
I'm glad that you're not my doctor!
Your post is partially correct. Our blood is red. The blood that
flows in the veins id a darker red because the oxygen in the cells
has been exhausted, i.e., it's used blood. The blood in arteries is
a bright red, as it's freshly oxygenated.
Greetings All
Most of you seasoned LX owners probably know this information inside and out, but to
those who
have just bought or are contemplating buying their first LX, I found the subject to be
very
informative.. Enjoy.
No problem actually I may have given you bad advice someone else on the list, I
forget who mentioned the Pentax USA treats the P5 as if it didn't exist since
because they never sold it officially in the US.
At 01:57 AM 5/23/2001 -0700, you wrote:
Thanks! (Guess I was just impatient...)
-
It's not the lens, it's the camera. The reason is that polarized light
cannot travel though the semi transparent mirror to reach the AF sensors,
so it won't focus right (or at all). Also, the LX will not meter right
unless you have a circular polarizer (because the sensors for the light
meter
Autofocus is a no-no. Zoom lenses are a no-no. Not being able to
set my own exposure is a no-no. While a meter might be nice, I'd
have to be able to control it completely, including turning it off
and still being able to set exposure, otherwise a meter will only
get in the way. Thanks for
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
You are correct about the retina cells (cones, specifically, I
think) that cause the red eye effect (in humans) the green color in
some cats, and yellow in other cats and mammals.
Red in the case of Siamese cats (and, I suspect, other blue-eyed cats)
--
John Francis
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1240410494
I'd like to see the picture of this one. It would have to be freaking huge
wouldn't it?
brent
Pal,
I would consider buying some small items, i think a positive feedback of 10
or so should suffice. I would also list the price of shipping to the US in
the auction.
Cya
- Original Message -
From: Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 8:17
the filter would have to about 1 foot across!
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 10:33
AM
Subject: EB: 500/1.8 !?
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1240410494
I'd like to see the
Actually that's something of a simplification in the case of the LX. The
camera won't
meter properly in manual mode. On automatic the exposures will be as close
to perfect
as the LX usually delivers. The display just won't indicate give an
accurate indication of
the shutter speed.
At
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1240410494
I'd like to see the picture of this one. It would have to be freaking huge
wouldn't it?
brent
I'll bet it's really a f1:8 (i.e. f8)
--
John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Silicon Graphics,
Probably one of the same sellers who list 50mm 1:2 lenses as 50mm 1.2
Todd
At 08:33 PM 5/23/01 EDT, you wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1240410494
I'd like to see the picture of this one. It would have to be freaking huge
wouldn't it?
brent
-
This
Greetings
In view of the recent thread re: underwater photography, this man does it with a LX
Don
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org
I bought my first SLR in 1966, a used Honeywell Pentax H2 or H3 (don't
remember now). Soon after that, I guess, Honeywell stopped being the
importer.
Today in a camera store I found an old, metal, push-on 49 mm. lens cap
labeled Heiland Pentax. Does anyone know what this company was, and when
On Wed, 23 May 2001 19:30:40 -0600, Joseph Tainter wrote:
Today in a camera store I found an old, metal, push-on 49 mm. lens cap
labeled Heiland Pentax. Does anyone know what this company was, and when
they were the importer?
If memory serves, they were a division of Honeywell. They, Honeywell
Whoops, forgot the URL sg --sheepish grin
http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/underh20/housing/htmls/wife.htm
Don
From: Donald Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 9:14 PM
Subject: LX - another interesting link
Greetings
In view of the recent
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Peifer, William [OCDUS] wrote:
Hi Ayash,
Both my K1000 and KM can do multiple exposures -- I suspect all the other K
(and M??) bodies have this capability as well, but I'm not sure. What price
range were you looking at? Used K1000's in good shape seem to be going for
Hi Todd!
Many thanks for the information. I visited the website that you have
mentioned in your reply. Yes, my head really spinned.
Cheers,
Ayash Kanto.
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Todd Stanley wrote:
The Ricoh XR-7/XR-S/Sears KS-2 have it (those 3 are all the same camera).
Sigma also has a
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Gerald Cermak wrote:
But cat's eyes are different than humans, in that they also reflect
surrounding light, some of comes back out in a focused beam (tapetum
lucidum). See
http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/may97/863469939.Zo.r.html
Cheers,
Gerald
Hi Gerald!
I
Hi Guys,
Just to prove that an AF160 flash can be useful, this little test.
No Flash. Super A, F50-1.7, Shot at F2 for 1/30.
http://personal.mia.bellsouth.net/mia/g/e/genius91/Scan715.jpg
AF160 Flash low power setting. Super A, F50-1.7,
Hi Douglas,
How are you finding the SuperA?
Cya
- Original Message -
From: Douglas E Harmon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 2:59 PM
Subject: OT: Waste of Bandwidth: Fill Flash, Even AF160s can be useful...
Hi Guys,
Just to prove that an
Gary L. Murphy wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2001 22:27:41 -0400, Frank Theriault wrote:
Yeah, well, it's the short-term memory that goes first anyway! :-)
Huh? What was your name again? :-))
Later,
Gary
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Chris, on extension tubes, wrote:
Does the close-focusing ability of the lens affect this? That is, would I
get the same magnification using a 50mm extension tube on a 100mm macro as
I would on a regular 100mm? If not, then differences in close-focusing
ability must affect the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You might want to do as I did: Spend a couple weekends as follows:
Hi Paul ...
Ive downloaded everything that was of interest on Gandy's site.
Thanks for all the other pointers.
The Leica CL, Minolta CLE, and Contax G are not pocketable. Shel already
has a great
Hmm. Maybe it's unusual that my cat gets red-eye. Is it also unusual for
cats to speak, levitate and turn their heads 360 degrees? Maybe I should
stop eating those mushrooms I find in the woods ...
My cat is green eyed, and gets wicked cases of green-eye effect when
she's
posing directly at
What was the exposure and aperture for the flash shot?
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
... there is no point in pressing the shutter
unless you are making some caustic comment
on the incongruities of life - Phillip Jones Griffiths
Douglas E Harmon wrote:
Hi Guys,
Just to
91 matches
Mail list logo
