Bill,
Sorry to hear about your parts camera. Doesn't sound like it will win
any beauty contests.
I just shot a wedding today entirely with my 67II. I have to agree
about fitting your hand. The 67II grips are even better than the 67.
You can really hold on to the camera well. Then when I
i haVE a zeiss 28mm f2.8 lens for pentax and the image quality is awesome is
thjere other zeiss lenses available for pentax
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, wendy beard wrote:
Can anyone tell me of any obvious differences between the MZ-3 and the
MZ-5n apart from the top shutter speed being higher on the 3? (and the
price, of course)
There's the same number of shutter speed marks on the dial, so the
addition of 1/4000 on the
If you don't want to seem insensitive, don't post insensitive comments
... you come across as a real jerk (I didn't want to appear insensitive,
but I had to tell it like it is).
Mishka wrote:
don't want to seem insensitive (i was sorry to hear about Buddy), but just
couldn't help myself
K lenses are generally less common than M and A series lenses.
- Original Message -
From: Mishka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 3:04 PM
Subject: Re: K, A, M macro lenses...
K and M has a *lot* better build in my view. A has better coating.
If
Hi,
Just wondering if an LX screen will fit in an MeSuper? i assume the meter
would definately be out.
Thanks,
Paul
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
I'm a few hundred messages behind at the moment.
*Part* of the reason for that is that one band's busy season has
begun, and another band got involved in a play.
Anyhow, I was on stage (well actually _beside_ the stage, since
it was too small to fit all nine of us, and was only a platform a
http://www.geocities.co.jp/Hollywood-Stage/2802/LeicaPentaxlens.html
==
¥þ±¡²y¤J¡G¥@¬É¬×2002 http://worldcup.sina.com.hk
µ¹»·¤è¿Ë¤Í¶Ç¤WµLÅå³ß¡Ghttp://sms.sina.com.hk
·s®öÅ]ªk¦Ê¦h´Úºâ©Rµ{¦¡--«l·Ç¡I http://ifate.sina.com.hk
-
This
Picked an ESII in not bad condition today, for A$55 including an SMC
50/1,4 and a Vivitar 2x converter, a couple of irrelevant flash guns
and a close up lens #4, all in an aluminium case. Unfortunately, the
lens had obviously been run over by a truck, as the barrel was oval
rather than
S76, LR44,.. the list of compatible battery is long :)
Just take the one you took to store and ask for an equivalent one.
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 06:53:17PM +1000, John Coyle wrote:
Picked an ESII in not bad condition today, for A$55 including an SMC
50/1,4 and a Vivitar 2x converter, a
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1349304300
I remember someone here looking for 50/1.2 and that the last one went
for much more than this. I dont need or particularly want this one.
Whoever wants it can take it :) (err... not free ofcourse).
Is there any place where pdml-ers
someone wrote:
K and M has a *lot* better build in my view. A has
better coating. If the design is the same (check the
Boz's site -- I think they are), I can't see why K
should be more expensive.
---
Depending on the price range, the built quality of the
A-lenses differ.
Jonathan wrote:
#1)I was inspired to save up and hold out (look
harder?) for a Pentax K18/3.5 until I learned its true
focal length of 19mm.
Where did you learn that? Mine seem awfully wide
Can it take the Cokin P system without vignetting?
The 18/3.5 can take it if you're careful
Hi Glenn,
Great tale! More of it I say - and totally on-topic as far as I'm
concerned. Sounds like you had a great time, and when the chips are down,
that's just the sorta thing i like to read - inspires me to get off my
lazy arse and grab the gear :-)
Thanks a lot,
Cotty
PS Did you get
Hi folks,
This may be interesting to those of you looking at scanners vs format vs
quality. It's a Japanese site, but there's enough English to be able to
follow it - just:
http://www.myalbum.ne.jp/cgi-bin/a_menu?id=fa268931
My sister's bloke pointed it out to me. He's a website designer and
Actually he did Jeff,sorry i forgot to add that.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yea, that could be just as painful.
Aaron didn't feel sorry about your cat? Bummer.
Jeff.
-
Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario Canada
http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj
Sign up
Thanks for sending that Shel.Very nice.
Dave
Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario Canada
http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj
Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and
I was hoping to try some this spring but its
not available at the 2 stores i buy film from
anymore.Only the RG 100-200 and 400
Dave
Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario Canada
http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj
Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail
-
This message
I've been using the HP ScanJet 5470 for a number of months now, and I really
like the scans. It does a good job on slides and negatives 2400 x 2400, and
for a relatively inexpensive scanner (less than $300), I think it does an
awesome job.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
Yeah and she didn't take long on the list to make my kill file as well.
On Saturday 27 April 2002 10:33 pm, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
If you don't want to seem insensitive, don't post insensitive
comments ... you come across as a real jerk (I didn't want to appear
insensitive, but I had to tell
Take your pick:
357, Type J, 228, 10L14, Rw22, RW42, G-13, G-13F, WL14, SR44W, 7, 541,
8008, D76, EPX76, F76, 576, GP76, MS76H. RS76, K576.
On Sunday 28 April 2002 03:53 am, John Coyle wrote:
Picked an ESII in not bad condition today, for A$55 including an SMC
50/1,4 and a Vivitar 2x
This is so beautiful it made me cry. Thank you for posting these comforting
words. It's so sad to lose a beloved pet.
My condolences to Dave and his family on their loss of Buddy. I lost my cat,
Gus, a couple of years ago at age 2 due to a congenital kidney problem. But
then, along came
Cotty,i think he said it was 28702.8VBG
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS Did you get the cute nikon girl's number?? ;-
)
Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario Canada
http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj
Sign up today for your Free E-mail at:
Duracell #303/357 should do it.Also replaces
the LR44.The are not expensive,usually under
$3.00 Can at Home Depot
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Nitin Garg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
S76, LR44,.. the list of compatible battery is
long :)
Just take the one you took to store and ask for
Subject: Re: I WON!!! at Ebay
- - Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: I WON!!! at Ebay
Does anyone ever snipe when there's no bids on an item?? g
As much as I hate to have to admit it, I've taken to sniping in almost every
situation. I'd lost a couple of things that I
Brendan.Did you put a grip on yours,or do they
come with one.Thats why i backed off on the
5n,felt to small.
Dave
Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario Canada
http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj
Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail
-
This message is from the
Mishka's comment about the rainbow bridge did make me smile. I think it
was only offered in jest. Let's be honest, the rainbow bridge is a wee
bit over the top. A bit of levity in response was not totally
inappropriate or insensitive.
Paul
Ken Archer wrote:
Yeah and she didn't take long on
William Robb wrote:
Does anyone ever snipe when there's no bids on an item?? g
Absolutely! Someone on the list recently published a URL to a study
confirming that once a first bid has been placed, an item will draw more
bidders. I've found this to be true, and for this reason often lurk
On 28 Apr 2002 at 3:46, Alexander Krohe wrote:
Depending on the price range, the built quality of the
A-lenses differ. Cheaper lenses (e.g. the A28/2) have
plastic barrels while the more expensive ones have
metal all-barrels. IMO there is not much difference in
the built quality between the
Let's be honest, Paul - *you* think Rainbow Bridge is over the top.
Many people find it warm and touching. To poke fun of someone's
sadness, or how they deal with grief or that sadness, is, as Mishka
said, insensitive, and in so saying he/she/it knew it might offend or
upset some people.
On 27 Apr 2002 at 21:22, Jonathan Donald wrote:
#1)I was inspired to save up and hold out (look
harder?) for a Pentax K18/3.5 until I learned its true
focal length of 19mm. That seems so close to 20mm,
that I might as well just get the A20/2.8 which is
[somewhat] cheaper, easier to find,
I have to agree with Shel here. Some people deal with death with a sort of
black humour. I do sometimes as well, but I make sure that my audience
knows where I'm coming from, and that they share or at least understand my
perspective. That's pretty hard to do on a list like this, so I don't
I used to use this several years ago. I found it OK for
a high-speed color film, basicly due to its Kodak color
palatte rather than any grain-fineness issues. It is a
rather grainy film. I tended to shoot it at 800asa (+1/3rd)
to assure good saturation.
Hi Jonathan,
Have you considered the Pentax FA 20mm 2.8, I have one
and it's an awesome lens?
I hate to ask you this question, but here goes, Why
get a great, expensive , sharp Ultra Wide, then put a
plastic filter in front of it?
Sincerely,
Ryan
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 21:22:56 -0700 (PDT)
Mine has the fg grip. I liked the MZ-M at first cause
i was so small
but once I got longer lenses I soon found I wanted a
bit more weight
nas size to the camera.
--- David Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brendan.Did you put a grip on yours,or do they
come with one.Thats why i backed off on
So sorry to hear about your cat, Dave. My thoughts are with you.
--Amita
Sorry to bother everyone,just a little down
today.My favorite Cat,my best portrait subject
and Little Buddy lost a battle with a car
last night.
He'll be sorely missed in this house hold.
Dave
I own a PZ-1p
Now I need a backup body and the shop here in my town has a used PZ-1 for
sale.
Should I buy it, or should I look for another PZ-1p ?
I don't know exactly the differences between the two bodies, but mainly I'm
interested in the viewfinder. I read somewhere that screens of PZ-1 are
William Robb wrote: In general, the K lenses are mechanically smoother
than A
lenses, and optically better than M lenses.
Yep. Someone--Shel?--reported last year that many M lenses replaced the K's
brass with aluminum, affecting smoothness of focus, especially in cold
weather.
Paul
Now, something that you haven't mentioned that I find as a more
usable combination is the F 17-35 fisheye and one of the 20's.
The fisheye zoom is unique in that it zooms from almost 180
degrees to almost the same focal length of the 20mm rectilinear.
At the 35mm end, it is about the same
Alberto,
Viewfinders in the PZ-1 and PZ-1p look identical. I cannot notice the 1/2
stop difference in screen brightness. In addition, I've used the brighter
screen PZ-1p in the PZ-1 and had difficulties seeing any different results
with slides.
Some say that the PZ-1 exposes best for
On Saturday, April 27, 2002, at 04:12 PM, David Chang-Sang wrote:
I may trip out that way tomorrow afternoon (if I get time) because I'm
hunting for the same equipment :)
Summer hours: closed on Sunday. Sorry, man, I'm catching up on my
sleep. I did make a rare Saturday appearance today,
On Friday, April 26, 2002, at 06:20 PM, Steve Larson wrote:
Does that person start with M?
s, don't say his name. It's like the Scottish play thing.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
On Saturday, April 27, 2002, at 03:53 PM, Jeff wrote:
Yea, that could be just as painful.
Aaron didn't feel sorry about your cat? Bummer.
Hey now! It was tough for me, cuz Dave had downright adorable pictures
of him.
Poor kitty, looked like my mom dad's cats.
-Aaron
-
This message is
On Saturday, April 27, 2002, at 03:58 PM, frank theriault wrote:
Better check with Aaron. He told me earlier in the week that he's
starting
summer hours this weekend, meaning closed most Sundays. I guess
now that
the Sheridan students are gone for the summer, there's only us pdml'ers
- Original Message -
From: Mishka
Subject: Re: Why some need f/22 (was: Re: Thanks Ultra-Wide
Anglers! (Now a few more questions...)
now that i think about it, i remeber i needed that a few
times.
once was last year when i was trying to shoot a waterfall and
wanted to get
a
Sunday, April 28, 2002, 8:28:03 AM, wayne wrote:
wwaprhm i haVE a zeiss 28mm f2.8 lens for pentax and the image quality is awesome is
wwaprhm thjere other zeiss lenses available for pentax
None. And none at all.
Sorry to disappoint you (but you shouldn't be since the *image
quality* is awesome,
Saturday, April 27, 2002, 7:00:35 PM, Mark wrote:
ME Here's a question for you Old lens--new body. Who's put together pieces
ME with the largest age difference?
I am sure it can be beaten, but I have an early post-war Zeiss Jena
(Olympia) Sonnar, converted to K-mount, on my LX (3rd gen).
T Rittenhouse wrote:
I think that it is only common courtesy not to step in someone else's
puddle. If you are not interested leave it alone. (small snip)
The two exceptions are:
1. If you are the seller, and a regular member of this list. (If you don't
contribute here, but just sign up to
I have this filter now. Didn't have then. But I agree that this is a much
better option than stopping down that much.
And as for the slower film -- it was a cloudy day and the only roll I had
was the one (400) in my camera.
now that i think about it, i remeber i needed that a few times.
once
Can't say for A,
Why would you want to use 1/22 in the first place? I
am just curious.
I know that f22 sounds like an overkill, (especially
with wide angle lenses), but I frequently use every
inch of the DOF available to me. I am a botanist, and
I like to make environmental portraits of very
I might get the name wrong. What i meant is the effect you get when you set
a really long exposure (1s+) and get the water washed out (kinda like a
veil) rather than stopped in action. I rarely have film slower than 100 and
often even that is too fast if I want to have a reasonable (1/8) aperture
I agree with everything Cotty said: an excellent day, and thanks for sharing it with
us. You didn't let the Nikon girl get away, did you?
Pat White
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit
Forgive me if I wax philosophical.
One of the (IMHO) problems with society today is a lack of civilization. We
are not becoming a kinder gentler world, even though we have the means and
communications to do so. Rather, we are becoming less sensitive to the needs
and comfort of those around us.
No,sorry Jeff,Henrys downtown.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: RE: Vivitar Series I, 19-35.
You mean Downtown camera?
I'll give them a try
Jeff
- Original Message -
From:
Actually when i could not find RG1000 for the indoor show last weekend,i
bought a roll of Fuji 1600.All iin all,i was impressed.They were of obvious
quality thet low light would bring but i showed them to Aaron and he thought
the grain was not to harsh.
These are just for the kids to see their
Thanks for that info.I have ordered one and hope to have it soon.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Andreas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 12:45 PM
Subject: Epson 1650
Hi,
for those who are interested in buying a flatbed scanner for slide
Butch Black wrote:
The ultimate form of human maturity is a willingness to take complete
responsibility for oneself (United consumers club)
I don't know about the rest of you, but the writings of the United
Consumers Club have long served as a source of inspiration for me vbg
Paul
-
This
David.I sent you a mail,did you get it.Id be interested.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: David Chang-Sang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 8:27 PM
Subject: FS: 28mm Super Takumar f3.5 M42 / Screw Mount
Well..
Before I drop this puppy up on Ebay
Brand new Winder MX in box for the equivalent of $70. I love it already - it
came in handy during photographing children feeding an elaphant in a circus.
ukasz
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget
33 attempts and 25 usable prints later I just stripped
the locking
screw on the Omega B-22. The screw was already on it's
way out and
I've been told it was a common weak part but it broke
just as I was
ready to print one of the best pics I took during
Stan's TPDML
visit. Just plain bad timing on
Jonathan Donald wrote:
The 18/3.5 isn't really that poor
Anyway, I
recommend the 18/3.5. A drawback for some will be the
very warm color rendition.
Is it possible that this is a sample variation? Have
other owners noticed this? One poster on Stans lens
comment site said it was identical
Sunday, April 28, 2002, 6:19:33 PM, Mishka wrote:
M Thanks Paul,
M That didn't occur to me. Seriously.
M I thought more along the DOF line, and 20mm should have everything in focus
M way before f/22.
With the F/Calc, I computed, using a circle of confusion for APS film
size (because the COC
Alberto,
I am sure you have read up on this, but if you shoot lots with
flash and ambient combined, the PZ-1 cannot do the easy flash
compensation of PZ-1p.
Just a note.
Frantisek
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Sunday, April 28, 2002, 8:21:23 PM, William wrote:
WR - Original Message -
WR From: Mishka
WR Subject: Re: Why some need f/22 (was: Re: Thanks Ultra-Wide
WR Anglers! (Now a few more questions...)
now that i think about it, i remeber i needed that a few
WR times.
once was last year
Aaargh!
Get a nice new toy in - and it bloody disappears before I have a chance to
play.
Gone - Arsat 300mm F2.8. Gone - Helios 85mm F1.5. Gone - Cokin Creative flash.
I hate my job.:)
Just in today, another 35mm F2M, even nicer,
and a 100mm F4 Bellows Lens boxed with case (minty).
I just got off the phone talking to my wife who is out to Utah
attending a couple of weddings. She told me that the one she went to
last night was shot by a husband/wife team. They have gone fully
digital and are selling off their film gear. They told her that they
have blown up to 30 X 40 and
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Nope, you saw one with a metering prism on it. You have to turn it on,
I think. Dunno, I don't have one. Another giveaway is that it sticks
out on the left, over the shutter speed dial. The non-metering prism
does not, and makes the camera appear
Jonathan,
There are other 17 and 18mm choices out there:
1. Ricoh made an XR Rikenon 18/2.8. A couple months ago one was on German
EBay. It sold March 10 to a European PDMLer for just 156 Euros (about
$120). It resembles the Pentax 18/3.5 but uses a 67mm filter (vs. 58). I
have a photo of it;
I think the wedding photographer comments below say a lot about their
previous MF workflow. I've seen showcase Lightjet prints that originated
as 35mm chromes, medium format chromes, large format chromes, and
Nikon D1x direct digital captures. If they're done right, images sourced
from medium
- Original Message -
From: Mark Erickson
Subject: Re: The old digital/film debate
I think the wedding photographer comments below say a lot
about their
previous MF workflow. I've seen showcase Lightjet prints that
originated
as 35mm chromes, medium format chromes, large format
While out photographing this afternoon my trusty electronic helper
sniped the high bid on a LN 35mm Negatrans for the Beselers ... neat!
This'll speed up the making of proof prints, and will be a fine
compliment to the medium format Negatrans that came along with the
dichro enlarger. Next up, a
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1347280318
William Robb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Hey, that's Super! And you got it from Grimes, too. He's the man!
Good catch, Mr. Wheatfield.
William Robb wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1347280318
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/
On 28 Apr 2002 at 17:20, William Robb wrote:
One issue that comes to mind for me is copyright. If the
photographer cannot produce an original negative to prove
ownership, can he enforce copyright on the image?
Hi Bill,
Interesting question. I figure that firstly information including the
Bruce, you're right, the dogs are eating it -
I'd really like to see what sort of 30 x 40 this couple is getting (mainly
because I wouldn't want a 30 x 40 hanging anywhere in my place... but I'm
sure this may be the preferrence for some folk) because, unless they're
using Genuine Fractals and 6mp
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: Latest Acquisition
Hey, that's Super! And you got it from Grimes, too. He's the
man!
Good catch, Mr. Wheatfield.
Thanks Shel. When I saw it was Grimes selling it, I couldn't
help myself.
Bill
-
This message is from the
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert
Subject: Re: The old digital/film debate
On 28 Apr 2002 at 17:20, William Robb wrote:
One issue that comes to mind for me is copyright. If the
photographer cannot produce an original negative to prove
ownership, can he enforce copyright on
The AF500FTZ is by far the best flash for the money. If you spend the little
extra for it, you will not be dissapointed. I remember seeing someone on the
list selling their's for about $210 if I'm not mistaken in the last few
days. But to be fair, the first flash that I had for my pz1p was the
The biggest issue with the NiCd packs is not overcharging (a full
charge is 16 hours)
Other post says 6 to 10 hours. 16 would be a max ?
but with having to wait until they are dead to recharge them, or
rigging a device to discharge them before you charge them.
Because of memory building ?
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 10:28:28AM +1000, Rob Studdert wrote:
One interesting exclusion in the current crop of digital cameras is that even
though they write all manner of information into the file at the time of
capture none provide an option for the camera owner/authors name to be
Nice buy. It should make a great landscape lens on the 4x5. I'm jealous.
Paul
William Robb wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1347280318
William Robb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
Put a roll of film in the camera. The 6x7 shutter won't fire unless
there is film in the camera. There's a workaround, but you ought to just
try running a roll through it, and see how the transport mechanism and
shutter perform.
Paul
William Kane wrote:
Ok,
Here's the 'update' on my
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 10:11:59PM -0400, Mishka wrote:
Whatever you hide into your image, unless it is showing on the print, it
can be removed simply by re-JPEG-ing it.
Digital watermarking is more involved then that. Simple re-JPEG-ing
(like the sound of it :)) wont work without degrading
Yep ... don't do that g.
I don't think there's anything that can be done about it. I don't think
I ever encountered the problem, but, in all honesty, I rarely, if ever,
photograph the sky. I tend to keep my cameras focused on more
earth-bound subjects. What's up there that's so interesting,
On 28 Apr 2002 at 22:11, Mishka wrote:
Whatever you hide into your image, unless it is showing on the print, it
can be removed simply by re-JPEG-ing it. And if it does show on a print, it is
not hidden. As far as the image tags are concerned, *anyone* can overwrite them.
If your customers
Rob,
See, you are assuming that there's an a priori knowledge of who is the owner
an who infringes. Although it is often true in case of software, books and
music, I think it is more vague in case of photographs. There're no
negatives, just two (almost) identical image files. If I am an abuser, I
If you can shoot at f22, either increase your shutter speed or decrease your
film speed. I don't believe I have ever had to shoot at f22...
In a message dated 4/28/02 10:38:41 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
With f/22, you can use the lens in brighter light even though your camera
is loaded
In a message dated 4/28/02 10:57:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That goes without saying. Anyone serious about photography should not bother
with this fast film. A good 400 speed film is as fast as you need to go, even
with that you're giving up colour and sharpness.
Has anyone tried this?
I doubt you really even got F22 at 2000 of a second. Chances are the
reflection from the snow was throwing your meter off and you really needed to
open up 2 or 3 stops to hold the whites in the snow. I'll bet you got blue
snow or difficult to print negs. It's extemely rare in nature that there
Guys: what speed of film are you using. It really should not be an issue if
you're using a slow speed, high saturation film. 100asa or less...
In a message dated 4/28/02 11:49:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
now that i think about it, i remeber i needed that a few times.
once was last year
Was the exposure actualy correct though?
I hit F22 and 1/4000 just last
week once trying
to get the CN tower's refelction in another building,
the film was 200
kodak gold.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
Brendan said:
I hit F22 and 1/4000 just last
week once trying to get the CN
tower's refelction in another building,
the film was 200 kodak gold.
This makes no sense at all. Using the Sunny 16 rule, the vase
exposure would have been 1/250 @ f16.0. Figuring some added brightness,
add a
I thought that with wedding photos, the customer has the copyright, unless he signs an
agreement granting the right to the photographer.
As for copying, wedding and sports photographers here in Victoria stress that they
don't give out proofs anymore. They either print up a digital 'contact
I just saw this on Ebay, and opted to BIN for $24
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1349523214
8 Russian M49 Filters..
yellow-1.4x; yellow-2x, yellow-green-1.4x; yellow-green-2x; Orange-2.8x;
blue-1.4x; br red-8x, dark-4x.
Having just priced the filters locally after deciding
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton
Subject: Re[2]: The old digital/film debate
I'm starting to feel like the days of charging by the print
are
changing. It used to be that the labor cost was buried inside
of the
cost of the resulting prints. Because of the ease of
duplication
I just saw this on Ebay, and opted to BIN for $24
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1349523214
8 Russian M49 Filters..
yellow-1.4x; yellow-2x, yellow-green-1.4x; yellow-green-2x; Orange-2.8x;
blue-1.4x; br red-8x, dark-4x.
They have 2 types of yellow-green (1.4X and 2X) but
- Original Message -
From: James Adams
Subject: M49 Filters for Pentax
I just saw this on Ebay, and opted to BIN for $24
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1349523214
8 Russian M49 Filters..
yellow-1.4x; yellow-2x, yellow-green-1.4x; yellow-green-2x;
Orange-2.8x;
On 28 Apr 2002 at 23:01, Mishka wrote:
Rob,
See, you are assuming that there's an a priori knowledge of who is the owner an
who infringes. Although it is often true in case of software, books and music, I
think it is more vague in case of photographs. There're no negatives, just two
- Original Message -
From: Pat White
Subject: Re: The old digital/film debate
I thought that with wedding photos, the customer has the
copyright, unless he signs an agreement granting the right to
the photographer.
That seems to depend on what country you are in.
William Robb
-
This
I didn't take the pic, there was glare on the building
that caused the
cameras meter to jump to that reading and I'm not
experienced enough
to know how I should have compensated, I just don't
shoot if I see
sun glare. I did snap another one on the old Molsen
building in BW
reflected off the
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
