I asked about it at the time and they said that the resistors and photocells
were still available from Japan! In the US, a throw-away society, the
suppliers are not concerned about support of a old product.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Alan Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pentax in the US
I have a different view here. When I went shopping for my digital PS, I
had the money and choices of Optios to choose. I did the wise thing and
thought of my needs and it's usage. That lead me to the 230 2mp. 6mp
cameras were out there already, but I chose mine to suit my needs. So with
a new
On Saturday, October 26, 2002, at 12:54 AM, Brad Dobo wrote:
It looks good to me except for the lcd screen. It's going to get very
smeary in very short order if that placement is what they go with.
Dan Scott
Just keep your nose clean ;-)
I think that screen will do it for me.
Dan Scott
Hello John,
John Glover wrote:
In case anyone wants to gripe to ebay about this.
http://cgi3.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?MfcISAPICommand=GetRNSWeb
FormShowflag1=0flag2=3flag3=6rcode=52010383100subjecttier1
=Questionable+Content+on+eBaysubjecttier2=Potentially+Infringing+I
Hi,
earlier this year I bought an extremely very excellent (as one of my
former colleagues would say) little device called an Emoscop to
supplement my 4x and 8x lupes for looking at slides. You can read all
about it here:
http://www.greenspun.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=002zAl
It's a
Hi,
The primes other than the 50 are too slow, although the focal lengths aregood.
Pretentious nonsense. For the majority of situations, these lenses are
fast enough.
You can call it nonsense if you like, but you've no right to call it
pretentious, which is a gratuitous insult and a
Hi Allan,
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002 22:02:22 -0700, Alan Chan wrote:
I'm considering installing a AG-80 AF Cross-Lined Matte screen in my
645n. This is the one with the grid.
I don't have 645, but since nobody is answering, I might try to constribute
here.
- Has anyone changed a screen in a 645n?
- Original Message -
From: Bob Rapp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 2:01 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Trading LX's
I asked about it at the time and they said that the resistors and
photocells
were still available from Japan! In the US, a throw-away
Well, first, I'm not an American, and I don't know about the US being a
throw-away society, but, while not owning older cameras that need repair, I
feel for those that do. It makes me wonder what kind or level of commitment
they have with North America. (Still waiting on that cable release :~( )
(Mental note: If I meet Dan Scott in person, do not ask to try out the new
Pentax DSLR)
:)
Brad Dobo
It looks good to me except for the lcd screen. It's going to get very
smeary in very short order if that placement is what they go with.
Dan Scott
Just keep your nose clean ;-)
I
Hi,
Vic wrote, about my preference for fast lenses:
Total agreement. Pretentious as all heck. It's not about the lenses. It's
about what you do with them.
Vic
then wrote:
Fast lenses are
prized for the brightness of the viewfinder when using them and the ease of
focusing when using manual
Thanks to everyone that took the time to respond! I enjoyed every email.
What an interesting group we have here, the trained and educated
professional, to the self-taught. From all I gathered, I feel like I'm on
the right track. I'll continue as I have, take the little courses, shoot,
shoot,
canipostnowandwillitmakeittothenethuhdougwillitwillithuhhuhwellwhatdoyouthin
kamibeingfilteredohlordynonononononono
canipostnowandwillitmakeittothenethuhdougwillitwillithuhhuhwellwhatdoyouthin
kamibeingfilteredohlordynonononononono
Hi
Third party flashes may damage the camera due to too high current or
voltage. But most modern flashes will be fine (if they are made after the
camera model, there's a good chance, the manufactorers know what they're up
against, right? I use many different Metz flashes and haven't had any
Note that the actual web graphic names are MZ-S digital-1, MZ-S
digital-2...
Maybe just stock photos they had?
Simon
-Original Message-
From: Dan Scott [mailto:daniel559;directvinternet.com]
Sent: Saturday, 26 October 2002 12:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Exclusive picture of
In addition to the cameras and lenses, don't forget to take a changing bag.
For those times something happens and you need to retrieve film from a dead
camera.
I have two and take the smaller one with me.
Bob
Send all 500 rolls of film to me! Free, of course and delivered at the same
cost. Contact me off line for shipping deatils.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Cameron Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Discussion Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 6:54 PM
Subject:
Not quite fryin' in the same pan anyway...
Shaun Canning
PhD Student
Archaeology Department
La Trobe University, Bundoora,
Australia, 3086.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 0414-967 644
-Original Message-
From: Rob Studdert [mailto:audiob;ozemail.com.au]
Sent: Saturday, 26 October 2002
From: Simon King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Exclusive picture of new Pentax D-SLR
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 17:40:34 +0800
Note that the actual web graphic names are MZ-S digital-1, MZ-S
digital-2...
Maybe just stock photos they had?
Simon
I have a stupid question. :-) Ever since beginning photography, flash has
been the most troublesome tool. However, what I'd like to know, is how
safe
is it to use other flashes on a Pentax camera? The Pentax literature
doesn't suggest it and warns against major malfunction and nuclear
According to the report by Photosharp Taiwan, the list price of the Pentax
D-SLR will be the same as Sigma SD-9, i.e. 200,000yen. They expect the
street price will be around NTD40,000plus (NTD = Taiwan dollar), which is
approximately about US$1200.
Rob,
You are not alone. I didn't understand it either. Perhaps there's a typing
error? Is stupid a substance? In any case 'throw'em' translates (for me at
least) to 'throw them'.
But I am also thick as two planks!
Don
Dr E D F Williams
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
Author's Web
Welcome to the list. I'm not an Angelino, but I do spend a few months a
year there on business, so I've done some camera shopping in the city. I
was going to say Samy's on Fairfax, but I see it's already on your list.
They occasionally have a Pentax rep visit, usually in conjunction with
one of
- Original Message -
From: Cameron Hood
Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 2:54 AM
Subject:
List is fixed, and nothing i have written for the last two
weeks made it.
Free NPH film, anyone?
5 rolls of 120 or 3 rolls of 35mm, free free free, anyone
care?
Cameron, I have never been one
Okay it's just nonsense. The writer of the original message had asked if
we thought his lens selection was correct FOR HIM. Like most of us, he
probably can't afford the ultra fast glass. Those are the lenses he
owns. His choice was correct. They are not too slow to produce great pictures.
Bob
Well, my LX did suffer from the syndrome. But you`re right, it could
have been a habitual thing firing the shutter.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: Chris Brogden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 6:42 AM
Subject: Re:
If you stick to brand name flashes, made in the last 15 years there should be no
trouble.
-Original Message-
From: Brad Dobo [mailto:brad.dobo;rogers.com]
I have a stupid question. :-) Ever since beginning photography, flash has
been the most troublesome tool. However, what I'd like
Paal,
I don't think WE said that. It was said in a press release from Pentax UK.
Most of us had originally thought that the new digital was going to be a
modification of the DSLR prototype shown 2 years ago. However, as I said
in a previous post, Pentax reps often get the details, if not
On Friday, October 25, 2002, at 10:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed, I think taking pictures is the best teacher of all. It helps to
develop a good eye for what makes a good picture. That's really half
the
battle. At my camera club, the big difference between the gold member
and the
Thanks for the translation. Being a hapless monolinquist, I only wish I
could deal with any other language as well as the imperfect English of
some on this list.
You know, if Pentax can really release a MZ-S- based 6MP DLSR for
under $1500, that would be one helluva camera in the current market.
On Friday, October 25, 2002, at 10:20 PM, Jeff wrote:
Not bad for a $20 camera.
I remember giving my daughter a $20 Vivitar camera, that fell apart
after 2
rolls.
Jeff.
I agree. Thanks Evan. I think I know what my Evan will be getting.
Jeff, $20 for a camera that falls apart after two
On Saturday, October 26, 2002, at 03:33 AM, Brad Dobo wrote:
(Mental note: If I meet Dan Scott in person, do not ask to try out the
new
Pentax DSLR)
:)
Brad Dobo
Sissy.
Dan Scott g
Last week-end, I met up with Mike Wilson in Newcastle.
To all you other folks who could have made it; -you really missed something!
Saturday afternoon, Mike picked me up at the airport and we drove straight
out in the countryside to take a good look at Hadrian's wall. Clear skies
and
Henry,
That explanation makes sense to me. I, for one, would be happy to
have the DSLR function and behave very similar to my MZ-S. I am happy
with the interface and handling and would prefer not to learn yet
another interface.
Bruce
Saturday, October 26, 2002, 7:44:51 AM, you wrote:
IHC
Afterall, if both the Photosharp report and Pentax UK do not contradict
with
each other, that means the new chassis of SLR is in fact MZ-S and a new
series of SLRs (including the flagship) will be based on MZ-S?!
I just love the pictures I see of the digital MZ-S, I think it's a smart
move to
Hi Boz,
I was actually going to send in a complaint, but when i click on the link,
it said a complaint on this auction has already been filedso it
appears someone beat me to it! It's just annoying to see folks use other
people's work for thier own.profit.
John
- Original Message
Grid screens have helped my photography greatly. I love 'em!
Christian Skofteland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom wrote:
- Am I going to freak out? I've used standard screens all my
photographic life.
- I'm considering it because
Weighing in a little late Doug! g But good to see you posting, and not
having to fiddle with the list (which to me has been working perfectly)!
Interesting you brought up the 'volume portrait biz'. I was looking at
looking into..heh...doing that. Personally, I would find it boring, but one
I guess I'm one of the few still thinking about the possible new film
flagship...
If the Photosharp report is accurate and the new Pentax digital SLR is based
upon the MZ-S chassis (in contrast to the Pentax UK press release's claim of
a new chassis), I wonder what that means for a new film
On 26 Oct 2002 at 10:04, Doug Brewer wrote:
Taken a couple of b/w courses, shot miles of film, but my real training was in
the trenches of the volume portrait biz, where over the course of a half million
or so shots I picked up a trick or two.
Of course, any PDML photographer worth his/her
It would greatly surprise me if Pentax didn't use as much of the original
MZ-D design as they can. They already paid to engineer it.
Len
---
From: Ryan K. Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Exclusive picture of new Pentax D-SLR
Date: Sat, 26
On 26 Oct 2002 at 16:32, Leonard Paris wrote:
It would greatly surprise me if Pentax didn't use as much of the original
MZ-D design as they can. They already paid to engineer it.
Yes it is practically the only way that they could do it without costing
themselves a bomb given the prior
do any of you get the feeling you have a 'dud' roll
and don't want to pay top dollar to have it processed? Or should I,
despite
the cost, always go to my trusted photofinisher?
Regards,
Brad Dobo
Print film goes to Walmart, slides go to photo-express (a chain, I
think). Walmart does ok on
I hope it doesn't turn out to be vapor ware like the MZ-D.
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 26 Oct 2002 at 16:32, Leonard Paris wrote:
It would greatly surprise me if Pentax didn't use as much of the original
MZ-D design as they can. They already paid to engineer it.
Yes it is practically the
Excuse my ignorance folks, but what is Rob actually talking about and more
specifically, what is 'vapour ware'?
Brad Dobo
- Original Message -
From: Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: Exclusive picture of new
Pure speculation...wait and see...
--- Iren Henry Chu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all,
The Taiwanese photography website Photosharp
released a number of the
pictures of the new Pentax D-SLR which they
obtained from Pentax:
http://www.photosharp.com.tw
Everyone Sing Along!
Peter.
PENTAX FOREVER!
(An ode to Pål and the Pentaxians)
Im searching for a camera you see
Im just new to photography
I ask, Whats the best camera out there?
Pål says, Newbie dont you despair
Cuz its
Chorus:
PENTAX forever
PENTAX theres no better
PENTAX
Hi,
no, he didn't ask if it was correct FOR HIM. He asked
Would you be happy with the following lenses for a travel kit?.
He asked for our OPINION. I gave an opinion based on 25 years of
travel photography in over 20 different countries, an opinion which
many people might think carries a
See http://www.mail-archive.com/pentax-discuss%40pdml.net/msg90987.html
Cameron
Only in Canada you say.
on 10/26/02 1:54 AM, Cameron Hood at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
canipostnowandwillitmakeittothenethuhdougwillitwillithuhhuhwellwhatdoyouthinka
mibeingfilteredohlordynonononononono
All that I've seen so far are just controlled press leaks, and not full fledged Pentax
Japan press releases/product announcements. It just looks like an attempt to hold onto
customers until there is an official announcement next Feb. Right now it's all
speculation as to what the particulars of
clapclapclapclapclapclapclapclapclapclapclapclapclapclapclap.
Cameron
I can't. I just spit up my tonsils laughing.
BR
-Original Message-
From: Peter Jansen [mailto:mrpentax2002;yahoo.com]
Everyone Sing Along!
Peter.
Now, if we all assume that Paal is right, and no one makes money selling DSLRs, does
that mean Pentax will go broke with a sales smash? Maybe they should put a few bugs in
just to be safe.
BR
-Original Message-
From: Rob Studdert [mailto:audiob;ozemail.com.au]
Yes it is practically
I concur completely, Pal.
Cotty
Henry wrote:
I personally still have doubts on their claim, as Paal and Cotty have both
said that the new D-SLR will be based on a new SLR design. Any comments?
I don't think WE said that. It was said in a press release from Pentax UK.
Most of us
had
FREE FILM!!!
yeah, i'm in ... (I use quite a bit of NPH) 120 please
-bc
On 26 Oct 2002 at 1:54, Cameron Hood wrote:
canipostnowandwillitmakeittothenethuhdougwillitwillithuhhuhwellwhatdoyouthin
kamibeingfilteredohlordynonononononono
Both the titles and content of the report indicates that these photographs
are their exclusive photographs for the new D-SLR, which are supplied by
their Pentax source.
I have studied the pics of the Pentax DSLR on the Tawianese web site, and
the pics of the original MZ-D prototype, and I have
Hmm. I find this difficult to believe. Pentax Taiwan releases pics of the
new DSLR 'exclusively' to a web site?? I do not believe this to be true.
Maybe they are claiming the pics are exclusive to them, but I seriously
doubt this.
Cotty
Although it did not make it on time to be released
No wonder, there's war and struggel all over this planet...
This is a list about a very peacefull, artistic, creative subject;
photography!
Don't you all agree?
Jens
'-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Bob Walkden [mailto:bob;web-options.com]
Sendt: 26. oktober 2002 19:36
Til: Paul Stenquist
Steven wrote:
You know, if Pentax can really release a MZ-S- based 6MP DLSR for
under $1500, that would be one helluva camera in the current market.
Just my opinion, of course.
I've always said that Pentax will enter the DSLR market the moment volume is up and
prices down. However, in my
I can't decide on this one. The new one could be essentially identical
to the MZ-D (MR-51 or whatever it was), because, well, the MZ-D was
designed as a DSLR. On the other hand, it would be so easy to just
stick up some old MZ-D pictures. I assume that no one has seen these
particular pictures
Henry wrote:
Afterall, if both the Photosharp report and Pentax UK do not contradict with
each other, that means the new chassis of SLR is in fact MZ-S and a new
series of SLRs (including the flagship) will be based on MZ-S?!
Actually, they do contradict one another as the UK press release
Robert wrote:
If the Photosharp report is accurate and the new Pentax digital SLR is based
upon the MZ-S chassis (in contrast to the Pentax UK press release's claim of
a new chassis), I wonder what that means for a new film flagship.
A new film flagship based on the fairly small MZ-S
On Saturday, October 26, 2002, at 10:35 AM, Brad Dobo wrote:
I just love the pictures I see of the digital MZ-S, I think it's a
smart
move to use that platform, too bad I won't buy it :) Hmm...thinking a
bit
more, if (as I've heard) the MZ-S was a flop as far as sales and
profit, etc
for
Hi All,
I have 3 commercial shoots coming up, need some tips:
1) I have to take some pack shots of burgers and chips and milkshakes
a) should I take each individual item and then merge in photopaint or
display them as a meal and just shoot that (for A4 menu sized use)
b) besides
Steve Desjardins wrote:
It's certainly not nonsense to prefer faster lenses, however.
Of course it's not. I prefer them as well. In fact, everyone prefers
them, unless they're brain dead. However, it was nonsense to tell the
questioner that his lenses were too slow.
Paul Stenquist
On Saturday, October 26, 2002, at 04:56 PM, Feroze Kistan wrote:
The way I read it was that the person was so stupid
that it(stupidity) dissolved in water and floated to the surface,
which could be skimmed off the top for a period of 3 weeks.
Now all the funny is gone since you made me think
For your food shoot, hire a food stylist if possible. It makes a world
of difference. They know the tricks for making the food look good.
That's their job, not the photographers. I would try lighting the entire
assembly if it seems to be working. A composite is a lot of extra work.
I've shot some
- Original Message -
From: Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce)
Subject: RE: Exclusive picture of new Pentax D-SLR
Now, if we all assume that Paal is right, and no one makes
money selling DSLRs, does that mean Pentax will go broke with a
sales smash? Maybe they should put a few bugs in just to
Bruce,
Don't be so silly, this is serious stuff.
I'm having the lyrics put to music now.
To be on this list in the future,
you'll have to sing the first two stanzas from memory.
To post more than twice per week, you'll have to know 4 stanzas.
...and by the way, does Nikon have a song? How
Ya, like you skim the cream of the top of milk!
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 12:35 AM
Subject: Re: Metaphors (Was Re: A funny problem with digital)
On Saturday, October 26, 2002, at 04:56 PM,
- Original Message -
Subject: Re: THE PENTAX SONG: PENTAX FOREVER!
...and by the way, does Nikon have a song? How about that
Bruce!
Kodachrome. As good a Nikon song as there ever was.
William Robb
I'm using a table similar to this
www.sell-it-on-the-net.com/images/equipment/table_top_complete.jpg
so lighting is pretty easy. I've never shot transparency before but it makes
sense to shoot both types.
Thanks
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Testing, testing, is this on? knock, knock
Nine days without PDML updates? Aauugh! Hopefully it's back to as normal
as it gets.
Pat White
Sure looks like the same lens to me:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0009/Photokina/Pentax/000921-1948-17.jpg I
think I can even make out the F1.4 on the side of the lens in the old
dpreview shot from Photokina 2000.
-Original Message-
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [mailto:sylwek;ozon.com.pl]
Not a problem.I just got the impresion they were expecting
them at Mississauga next week.May be mistaken though.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Brad Dobo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:52:31 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: oops, stupid OE, read this one :)
Thanks for the synopsis Frank! For a variety of reasons having to do with
the LAN I've set up at home, the message you replied to actually sat in my
computer for a week, germinating or whatever, before suddenly and with no
warning springing forth last night. Meanwhile (a) I have been to Ottawa for
Not torn Brad.I just keep the ones current and pertain to my
photographic needs.
So far i have filled 3 3 binders.plus filled 2 more Lowepro's .Doh.
Dave
Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario Canada
http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj/
http://brooks1952.tripod.com/myhorses
Sign up today for your
Love to make that trip at least once Doug.Sounds like a blast.
Dave
Of course, any PDML photographer worth his/her salt attends the
annual
Grandfather Mountain Nature Photo Weekend.
At 04:16 AM 10/24/02 -0400, Brad wrote:
Hey folks,
I'm quite curious here. How many of you took some
Should be back on track Pat.I am.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Pat White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:07:19 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: are we back?
Testing, testing, is this on? knock, knock
Nine days without PDML updates? Aauugh! Hopefully it's
Dario - please set aside 5 for me, I'll PayPal you early next week. I will
keep one of those, JCO has a standing request with me for one, and I am sure
that another 3 requests will come in from around the U.S. In fact, I need to
go back in my files, but I think there is also a second outstanding
It's the same image all right. But, has anyone else noticed that this thing
is missing a vertical shutter release? I suppose it could be where the white
blob is, but it doesn't appear to be fitted to the MZ-D prototype. Hope they
get that right in the real DSLR.
Cheers
Shaun Canning
PhD Student
I know I'm preaching to the converted here, but I thought I'd post the
results from some scans I did today.
http://www.beard-redfern.com/scantest/index.htm
By the way, the scan of the print is pretty much true to life. That's the
sort of quality I'm getting back from the photo lab. Why they
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
All that I've seen so far are just controlled press leaks, and not full
fledged Pentax Japan press releases/product announcements. It just looks
like an attempt to hold onto customers until there is an official
announcement next Feb. Right now
On 26 Oct 2002 at 16:21, Lon Williamson wrote:
Reminds me of people who thought they were producers telling
musicians or record company execs that we'd fix it in the mix.
My 10 years of running an audio studio sayeth different: fix
it before it hits tape. I agree with ya, William.
I can't
On 26 Oct 2002 at 23:53, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Rob Brigham wrote:
Come on guys, it even has the same lens mounted that it was shown 2
years ago with at the show! These are old images! The whole article is
conjecture.
This is not the same lens. The one 2 years ago was FA 35/2 - here
You have all the right in the world to exist, but you don't because you are just
anonymous bits.
For low volume production items the cost is in the tooling and setting up production,
and not the materials.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Desjardins [mailto:DesJardinS;wlu.edu]
Please
On 26 Oct 2002 at 21:09, Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce) wrote:
For low volume production items the cost is in the tooling and setting up
production, and not the materials.
Apart from which even if the same moulds were able to be used to form a
polycarbonate chassis most of the fastening points
They don't need any fancy bugs, since Pentax service doesn't exist in North America.
BR
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:w_robb;accesscomm.ca]
Well, they can put in sticky mirror from the LX, and dying frame
counter from the ME/Super Program, and rusting ISO resistor from
With their tag line they hardly need a song No I won't bother repeating it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Rfsindg;aol.com]
...and by the way, does Nikon have a song? How about that Bruce!
Regards, Bob S.
On 26 Oct 2002 at 23:53, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Rob Brigham wrote:
Come on guys, it even has the same lens mounted that it was shown 2
years ago with at the show! These are old images! The whole article
is
conjecture.
This is not the same lens. The one 2 years ago was FA 35/2 - here
Good one, Bill! vbg
He shoots, he scores!
-frank
William Robb wrote:
Kodachrome. As good a Nikon song as there ever was.
William Robb
--
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
pessimist fears it is true. -J. Robert
Oppenheimer
The Scan Dual image is the best one by far.
My S20 scans are not as good.
Jeff.
- Original Message -
From: wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 8:46 PM
Subject: A good argument for buying a film scanner
I know I'm preaching to the
I hope you are right Dave. Maybe it'll arrive when the Pentax DSLR comes
out? ;-)
Brad Dobo
- Original Message -
From: David Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 7:32 PM
Subject: Re: Re: oops, stupid OE, read this one :) Re: Fw: Trading LX's
Well, it sounds to me that I'll have to raid the fridge for film instead of
beer and start shooting or I'll never catch up!
Not torn Brad.I just keep the ones current and pertain to my
photographic needs.
So far i have filled 3 3 binders.plus filled 2 more Lowepro's .Doh.
Dave
Pentax
Unfortunately that is too correct
They don't need any fancy bugs, since Pentax service doesn't exist in
North America.
BR
Gang, is it just be or does it sound like Pentax is *beeping* us over? Ever
get that used, dirty feeling? ;-)
Brad Dobo
My conclusion is that it is a controlled leak from Pentax to lower our
expectation on the so-called new chassis. MZ-S is already made from the
new
chassis which is
Sound read is it just meI just woke up...need coffee
Gang, is it just be or does it sound like Pentax is *beeping* us over?
Ever
get that used, dirty feeling? ;-)
Brad Dobo
Argh audible swearing
Should read is it just me.blah
Sound read is it just meI just woke up...need coffee
Gang, is it just be or does it sound like Pentax is *beeping* us over?
Ever
get that used, dirty feeling? ;-)
Brad Dobo
On Saturday, October 26, 2002, at 07:46 PM, wendy beard wrote:
I know I'm preaching to the converted here, but I thought I'd post the
results from some scans I did today.
http://www.beard-redfern.com/scantest/index.htm
By the way, the scan of the print is pretty much true to life. That's
Got a bit bored yesterday, so I did some numbers on DSLR lens fittings with
a 1.5 magnification factor. Have a look if you're bored too.
http://www.heritageservices.com.au/dslr_lens_changes.htm
Cheers
Shaun Canning
PhD Student
Archaeology Department
La Trobe University, Bundoora,
Australia,
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
