In a message dated 2/22/2004 10:37:06 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Terrible, IMO ...cropped too much, the photo loses some of
the context. Try saving most of the background from the
original, and lose the area to the right with your shadow.
IIRC, that's waht I was going
Hi guys,
Anybody had any experience with this lens before? Stan's web site only has
limited info on it.
Cheers
Andy
In a message dated 2/22/2004 6:50:34 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think that should be list list's motto! How many folks have *not*
succumbed to some sort of Pentax purchase after joining the PDML?
Pat in SF
You'll notice that no one is answering.
I'm not
I like this version better:
How do you make a small fortune racing?
Start with a large fortune.
At 02:36 PM 2/21/04, you wrote:
This is an old one -
How do you make a million dollars racing ???
Start out with $ 2 million dollars.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
You have to know him, but he could never be friends with another
living dog. It seems I'm shooting him with busy backgrounds
http://pug.komkon.org/03apr/elton.html.
At 03:22 PM 2/21/04, you wrote:
Ok I figured I'd contribute to this and I would like feedback
however there are a few things I
Well breakfast anyway. Composition is good, the exposure is within
reasonable limits, in fact it looks like I could reach into my monitor
and grab the glass. The question is what are you trying to say...
At 08:33 PM 2/21/04, you wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2151115size=lg
I
I don't know if it works or not but I bet they sell a lot of it.
At 11:43 PM 2/21/04, you wrote:
Thought this might help those with streaking negatives.
http://www.pbase.com/image/26262976
Cheers Chris K
I drink to make other people interesting.
-- George Jean Nathan
Not so far. I was hoping to hear from someone who knew of a retailer. The
place I bought mine is out of business.
At 10:09 AM 2/22/04, you wrote:
Peter,
I have the same scanner, so I am interested in the answer too, in case
anything happens. Did you found a solution for your problem?
Regards,
Sounds like the cold was effecting the battery. If the LX battery dies you
lose
long manual shutter speeds and automatic speeds. The camera tells you this by
locking the mirror up until you change the shutter speed to one that is
useable.
At 10:35 AM 2/22/04, you wrote:
So, yesterday was the
I believe the *ist D has a higher magnification than the MZ series of cameras.
At 10:58 AM 2/22/04, you wrote:
This is what the original question related to:
it appears to me that when I look through a 50mm lens with the *istD, the
subject does
indeed look closer than if I look through the same
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Andy Chang wrote:
Anybody had any experience with this lens before? Stan's web site only has
limited info on it.
It has been covered in the list over the past 6 months (and I should
know :-)
Andy,
I have answered several questions regarding this lens
lately...I copy below my first contribution that was
the longer...please feel free to ask if you need more
information.
Regards,
Jaume
-posted on 13-11-2003
I recently purchased a 'like new' 28-105/3.2-4.5 to
replace my 28-70/4,
Hi,
I am thinking of waiting until May before getting a DSLR. Not for
some new announcment, but simply that in May Czech Republic is an
EU country. Currently, most DSLRs are quite more expensive compared
to e.g. Germany, around 20% more. Although the prices will drop
when we are in
Oops I haven't done my homework properly...
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 5:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FA 28-105(F3.2-4.5)AL(IF)
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Andy Chang wrote:
Anybody had
Jaume,
That's exactly what I need!!! I think I may go and get one and ditch my
28-200 which is huge...
May I ask how much you paid for it?
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Jaume Lahuerta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 5:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kostas,
I forgot to ask... did you get it eventually? If you did, how much?
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 5:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FA 28-105(F3.2-4.5)AL(IF)
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004,
on 23.02.04 10:36, Frantisek Vlcek at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I must admit I am not sure I will stick with Pentax, but that
might depend on the price as well.
Hello Frantisek,
maybe Poland would be good destination? And it is near ;-) Anyway, after TAX
(VAT) deduction *istD price is around
I think it only can do it analogue when I buy an analogue adapter, so
that would be a SCA372. I don't know if this will work or not with the
camera, this adapter will work on the ME Super for instance with my
flash according to the Metz website.
I have the SCA3701, which works on the PZ-1 and
Hi Rob,
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 02:56:07 +1000, Rob Studdert wrote:
If the *istD simply erases files by changing the allocation table, than
this tool should work with *istD's CF-cards, too.
Well if anyone finds a working solution I'd love to know. All I saw were
fragments of FAT with no
Hi Frantisek,
this is Thomas from Germany.
I bought my *ist-D here in Koblnez at TeKaDe, he had the best prices by
a wide margin and does a great job in his service, too:
http://www.tekade.de
*istD body - 1449,00 EUR
*istD with FAJ 18-35 mm - 1749,00 EUR
*istD bundle with smc-DA
Sure,
I paid around US$190 in KEH for a 'like new' unit (it
really was like new).
The euro/US$ rate at that time (worst for me than
today) made the total amount (including shipment to
Spain) around 205EUR.
There were some of them for sale in KEH a few weeks
ago, but it seems that they have sold
My big glass is couple of 500 mirror lenses, including one big enough to
have a tripod foot. I have the newest version of the 3221, which
is a 3021 in black, with multi-faceted centerpost, leg pads,
and 4 angle legs. Heads are the 3030 (3029 pan tilt with small QR)
and the largest Giottos ball
I think I joined just shortly before he disappeared. I remember seeing
only one or two of his posts.
Paul
On Feb 22, 2004, at 7:59 PM, Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
William Robb
I honestly do not recall how long I have been on the list... But I do
recall
the first time I read a post from The Who.
No, in fact it was Lauders. A very inexpensive blended Scotch but quite
palatable.
On Feb 23, 2004, at 1:12 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
What kind of whisky ... a nice single malt, perhaps?
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Beer? Beer?? Lips that have touched beer shall never touch mine. It's
Whiskey.
I'm not trying to say anything. Much of what I shoot is mere
entertainment. If I think something make an interesting picture, i
shoot it. The exposure is dead nuts right on, based on the histogram
and a comparison of four or five bracketed shots. I'm amazed that you
can judge exposure based on
I've done the bungee strap thing, also hanging the camera bag
from the centerpost, and leaning the bag against whatever leg
most of the camera/lens weight is over. The third trick seems
to work the best. My standard approach now is to lay a hand on
the camera/lens above where it joins the head,
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
What kind of whisky ... a nice single malt, perhaps?
A single malt with *ICE* in?! Let's just hope there aren't any scots on
the list... ;-)
S
I thought this lens was discountinued, but this is not what is meaning in
page 13 of the 35mm Lens catalog or on this link
http://www.pentax.co.jp/japan/products/filmcamera/lens/index35_normalzoom.html
catalog (need japan version or plug in for acrobat)
how heavy are the mirror lenses?
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Lon Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 6:32 AM
Subject: Re: Support for big glass
My big glass is couple of 500 mirror lenses, including one big enough to
have a
http://www.wuthrich.cc/portret007.jpg
http://www.wuthrich.cc/portret016.jpg
http://www.wuthrich.cc/portret019.jpg
http://www.wuthrich.cc/portret036.jpg
Obviously comments welcome. These are 4 that I made last Saturday during
a portrait workshop.
Camera PZ-1, lens 24-90mm, film Fuji NPH400, and the
Sad? It's no use developing something you can't sell.
Design for profatibility. A company needs to survive. So they should
design what we ask for.
On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 22:52, frank theriault wrote:
Mike sez:
The fact is that the specification of the product when the product is a
lens
Try KEH, Mark.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Dalal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: February 23, 2004 12:13 AM
To: Pentax Discuss
Subject:Source for strap lugs
Hey Folks,
Anyone know a good source for strap lugs?
Thanks in advance,
Mark
One (footless) is about the same weight as my K135f2.5.
The other (footed) is about 3 lbs.
Herb Chong wrote:
how heavy are the mirror lenses?
- Original Message -
From: John Forbes
Anyway, the point is that it is perfectly respectable in hot
weather to
drink BLENDED whisky mixed with water and ice. But nothing else.
I pass this on from a radio program I heard on Robbie Burns day.
The CBC program Ideas was interviewing
I did a couple of practice/test 8x10 shots with the Fujinon 250/6.7.
The subject was my wife's trinket display on a small shelf,
about 6 ft. from the camera.
Even wide open this lens provides a good deal of movement with 8x10.
I had a 1 rise ( shooting vertical/portrait mode) with no notable
Mark Dalal posted:
- Original Message -
From: Bill Sawyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Try KEH, Mark.
They only have the strap lugs for the LX that are mighty expensive. I just
need 2 sets for my ME Super and Program Plus.
Mark, are you still in San Antonio these days?
If so, have you
I had an M 35-70 f/2.8-3.5 for a while. Huge and heavy for its zoom
range. It's probably the same or similar lens to the first autofocus
one sold with the ME F which _was_ a constant f/2.8. That may be why
it's often described as a constant f/2.8 when the non-autofocus
version is mentioned.
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 03:11:44 -0500, Peter Alling wrote:
How do you make a small fortune racing?
Start with a large fortune.
Yep, I can identify with that. My brother and I just got our SCCA
competition licenses ten days ago. We've already spent about $20k, but
we have our cars, tools, and
Frits Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.wuthrich.cc/portret007.jpg
http://www.wuthrich.cc/portret016.jpg
http://www.wuthrich.cc/portret019.jpg
http://www.wuthrich.cc/portret036.jpg
Obviously comments welcome.
Hi Frits,
In my opinion the first shot (portret007) is the most appealing.
Mr Robb posted:
The CBC program Ideas was interviewing the distillers who make
Scotch whiskey, and they all said to a man, that Scotch should be
diluted with anywhere from 20% to 40% with water, or a similar volume
of ice.
I don't know anything about whisk(e)y but was under the distinct
There were two sitters actually. But I agree with you.
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 14:27, John Forbes wrote:
16 works best for me. It looks totally uncontrived and natural. I'd
hazard a guess it's the sitter's favourite.
John
On 23 Feb 2004 12:46:26 +0100, Frits Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shel,
How would you do that? Would you place them in their work area, or at
home, or doing their favorite sport? Something like that?
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 14:02, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Fritz ...
The exposures seem to be pretty good, but these pics don't
do much for me. IMO, they're not
And the more you experiment, the more you have fun!
Incidentally, as a purist and a pedant, I should point out that the Scots
spell their brew without an E. The Irish do use an E, and they were
therefore probably the ones who invented bourbon. Of course, I may be
wrong.
I know the North
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark, are you still in San Antonio these days?
Yup
If so, have you tried checking with Boyd's Camera? Seems to me I've seen a
LOT
of pieces-of-old-cameras around their back room.
They have a back room with stuff? They've never invited me to the back room!
: (
Boyd's
Silly me. It's all that experimenting with whisky. I just thought he'd
aged a bit between exposures.
John
On 23 Feb 2004 15:12:29 +0100, Frits Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There were two sitters actually. But I agree with you.
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 14:27, John Forbes wrote:
16 works
Keith Whaley wrote:
Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
I had a friend who introduced me to the P1800.
Never got a ride or a chance
to drive one
Cesar
Panama City, Florida
The Volvo?
Stiff handling and stiff riding, and quite unconfortable all around.
Looked neat, but. . .
Here's one of several
Hello Shel,
While I certainly understand what you are saying, I would have to say
that your terminology is different than most. I think a portait is
what you would call a flattering, nicely lit picture of someone.
Something that goes deeper might be more akin to a study or some
such. Most of
I thought the MG was nearly identical to the ME/ME Super in its body
details. The ME and ME Super do take a winder drive cap, even though
you can barely see the threads (that does make the cap tricky to get
on and off easily without excessive jiggling). I know the Super
Program one is meant to
Priour to list,2 cameras with 2 zooms and 2 primes.
After list,10 cameras with 5 zooms and 8 primes.
Plus a TLR :-)
Dave
I bought the vast majority of my stuff after
joining this list.
For myself, pre auto-focus stuff, for my wife, new auto-focus
From: Stan Halpin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Keewl. Did it have nice glass?
Couldn't really telllooked like an M, maybe a 28, but don't hold me to
it.
The most interesting accesssory he had were leather pants.
tv
The bird that was wearing them wasn't bad either.
Cheers,
Cotty
Anthony Farr wrote:
The extra contact (on the ME Super hot shoe) lets the flash unit set the
camera's shutter to X-synch (1/125 sec) when it's fully powered. It might
also enable firing control depending on the level of dedication that the
flash unit supports. Firing control is where the shutter
I have made some photographs with my *ist D and the Tamron SP AF Macro
90mm/f2,8 .
I downloaded the files from the CF card, and opened the directory in
which they were downloaded in Pentax Browser 1.10.
I can see the thumbnails, but I can't open them full screen, and get an
error message like
I must be missing something quite obvius here, because I can't get the
point... I have read some posts on the net about rating the Fuji Superia
Reala 100 film at ISO 80 speed. AFAIK this is the equivalent of overexposing
by 1/5 f-stop. I have also read that I can under/over expose a color
negative
Joe Wilensky wrote:
I think this lens, like a few others, is at its shortest physical length
at 70mm and longest at 35mm, which is counterintuitive and also user
unfriendly -- at least to me, since I almost always carry a zoom around
at its most compact length. If a photo opportunity arises and
If a lab conpensated everything to give you an identical result using
computer technology then by the same argument there would be no point
having different films for low contrast/vivid colours etc. Changing the
exposure can change the basic characteristics of the film. If it were
just a simple
on 23.02.04 17:15, Boros Attila at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, is 1/5 f-stop that critical?
In case of negatives by underrating ISO you avoid problems with
underexposure. Most negatives give enlarged grain effect when even slightly
underexposed.
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
I frequently drink single malts with ice, so do some of my Scottish
friends. Drinking single malts neat is largely an American pretension.
Paul
Steve Jolly wrote:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
What kind of whisky ... a nice single malt, perhaps?
A single malt with *ICE* in?! Let's just hope there
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Boros Attila wrote:
On the other hand I realize the smallest amount of exposure compensation I
can set on my MZ-6 is 1/2 f-stop
You have finer granularity if you are prepared to play with the ISO
setting; I would be surprised if the MZ-6 does not have this. This is
how I
I love it, Rod!
Got my first good laugh of the day! Good way to start a Monday.
Thanks,
keith whaley
Rob Brigham wrote:
For all you Ebay addicts!
http://www.erikasfriends.com/for_net/lj/song_for_you.htm
Ah, but an LTD was big American Iron. The RX-2 was a little tin box
of a car, looked kind of like a cheep Japanese copy of a Volkswagon
Rabbit. (It just had the drive train of an RX-7 inside.
At 12:20 PM 2/22/04, you wrote:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 08:03:54 -0600, you wrote:
- Original Message
Interesting... How did you do it with a MZ50, Kostas?
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 12:46 AM
To: PDML
Subject: Re: Reala rated at 80
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Boros Attila wrote:
On the other hand I realize
Can you not override the ISO setting on the MZ-50? IF not, then I guess
you could still stick a different ISO barcode on the side of the film
canister and fool it that way - they are readily available pre-printed
for people who do bulk film loading. Don't know if you can get every
possible
I have to disagree there - as an Englishman with a large number of
Scottish friends and whisky-snob acquaintances, I can assure you that
the idea of drinking single malts with ice is widely (although not
universally) regarded as heresy over here. :-) The optional addition of
a small quantity
Well, sure, if you're talking about AC watts. . .
DC is a lot easier to remember and work with. g
[Cosine of phi indeed. . . mumble, mumble. . . mutter.]
If ya have enough amps, and get the angle just right, you'll make
Frank's ears wiggle!
keith
Frits Wüthrich wrote:
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at
Not a proablem, Frank.
frank theriault wrote:
Apparently, I was in a pissy mood earlier today.
Upon re-reading this post, it seems to me that it sounds rather
patronizing and snobbish. I was wrong in posting it, and I apologize to
the list, and most specifically, Tom, for posting it.
I am
If I'd have been in that Lotus, I'd sure have been nervous about that
ol' Volvo nerfing at my rear bodywork! g
keith
Stephen Moore wrote:
Keith Whaley wrote:
Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
I had a friend who introduced me to the P1800.
Never got a ride or a chance
to drive one
Hi Joe,
I have two MGs and neither have any threads in the winder attach hole.
Just a stepped hole!
keith whaley
Joe Wilensky wrote:
I thought the MG was nearly identical to the ME/ME Super in its body
details. The ME and ME Super do take a winder drive cap, even though
you can barely see
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2988439530ssPageName=ADM
E:B:DS:US:28
One of the best (Grade 4,4 according to Photodo tests).
Only the F 1.4/50mm is slightly better (4.6) and outperforms/matches the
very best (Leitz, Zeiss etc.).
All the best
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL
I know the override, but I didn't know that it is related to the usage
of the non-A lenses...
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Rob Brigham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 1:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Reala rated at 80
Can you not override the ISO
Rob B said
The lab will correct the exposure shift to make the picture
seem correctly exposed but it will have more 'punch'. This doesn't work
for all films, and will work differently for different films, but for
reala it works well in my experience. Reala
Steven Desjardins opined:
You know, whenever I go to the UK I usually beer at every meal (just
for cultural reasons) and I've never really found it to be warm. It's
usually cold, just not ice cold like they tend to serve it in the US.
As any good barman (barperson? bartender?) will tell
Looks good. Any chance of a translation of the blurb for those who don't
speak German?
Thanks
John
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 18:13:06 +0100, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2988439530ssPageName=ADM
E:B:DS:US:28
One of the best (Grade 4,4
I had an M 35-70 f/2.8-3.5 for a while. Huge and heavy for its zoom range.
True as most of us use f3.5 or f4 zoom in this range. But what I
meant was that for a f2.8 zoom, it is small compared to the
competition. Canon equivalent zoom is way longer and more heavy.
Olympus constant f3.6 has
...
D'ailleurs, ce serait intéressant de traduire
en anglais certaines de tes pages. À deux on y
arriverait peut-être...
Si tu veux traduire quelques parties
intéressantes pour les lecteurs anglophones, je
ny arriverai pas seul, mon anglais est trop
mauvais!
Michel
OK, je vais essayer et
Well,regardless wether its 1/2 or 1/3, or 1 stop, it will still give better results
than i
got Sunday by not
switching WB from florecent-- to-- sunny. LOL Blue snow,what a concept.vbg
Great way to test a new camera eh. :-)
Dave(must remember to change WB)Brooks
Surely the only thing to drink whisky [either single or blended ] with is
more whisky [or failing that a blonde?]
Clive [a welshman]
Antibes
France
http://www.hondaresearch.com/
I found the strap lugs a.k.a. metal strap D-rings on Adorama's website
($1.95/set).
Mark
You need the Pentax ones at double the price... Just kidding,
although I would prefer the Pentax square D-rings.
Andre
Interesting. Both my Sandisk and Viking cards drop out...
Cesar
Panama City, Florida
More gravity under the tropics...
Andre
I said
If so, have you tried checking with Boyd's Camera? Seems to me I've seen a
LOT
of pieces-of-old-cameras around their back room.
and Mark said
They have a back room with stuff? They've never invited me to the back room!
: (
They haven't *invited* me, per se, but I have small
It's a question of what they're designed for. :-) British beers are
brewed using different processes and yeasts from the lighter, fizzier
beers that are more common in the rest of Europe and in America. The
bigger brands of American beer have gained some popularity over here in
recent years,
Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu wrote:
Well... rating an ISO 100 film at ISO 80 doesn't means 'overexposing by 1/5
stop', but by 0.4.
ISO 50 is 1 stop, and ISO 75 half stop lower than ISO100.
... just to clear this up early on
80asa is 1/3rd stop over for a 100asa film
Thanks for the comment Bruce.
I was just getting ready to close up shop that day when she galloped up to us on the
stick
pony and
wanted to see our horses.WELL i smelt photo op.:vbg
I showed her dad the pic's with the lcd monitor and he wanted this one for the local
paper
he worked
for.I
Hehe - not for those with a low cuteness tolerance, but very nice. :-)
S
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really love this one. D1 with 80-200 f2.8,minor PS tweaking.
http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj/colla_3416.jpg
Dave
Andre Langevin wrote:
As the ISO dial is not practical to use, I was thinking about using the
compensation ring ourtide the clicks. Half way for a half-stop. I
think it would work although my half-stop may well result in 1/3 or
2/3 stops. Still OK for bracketing.
I just tried this on my ME
Back in the old college days I used to run a meager
Radio Shack 10wt/channel stereo amp into two Sears
guitar amp cabinets w/ 6 10inch Jensens in each. The
volume this junk produced was enough to bring the
resident advisor up to the 6th floor of the dorm
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Andy Chang wrote:
Interesting... How did you do it with a MZ50, Kostas?
The Pentax MZ-50 causes all lenses not in the A setting to meter as
if they are set in their widest aperture. This means that (unlike the
MZ-30 and the MZ-60) you can shoot with such a lens without the
Hi,
Monday, February 23, 2004, 5:44:37 PM, Steve wrote:
You know, whenever I go to the UK I usually beer at every meal (just
for cultural reasons) and I've never really found it to be warm. It's
usually cold, just not ice cold like they tend to serve it in the US.
last week, partly out of
It's all a matter of the temperature of the liquid.
Once whatever liquid there is warms up to room temp, you can't tell if
the water came from an ice cube or a splash from the tap. . .
keith
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Adding a little water (about half the volume of the whiskey) seems, for some
Just thought the subject line needed fixing. Carry on!
grins
ERN
Steve Jolly posted:
It's a question of what they're designed for. :-) British beers are
brewed using different processes and yeasts from the lighter, fizzier
beers that are more common in the rest of Europe and in America.
At 09:08 PM 2/22/04, John Mustarde wrote:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 20:14:32 -0500, you wrote:
snip
Lucky for him he got the message the first try, because I was holding
my John Philip Sousa album in reserve, with a full hour of Scottish
Bagpipers ready to deliver the coup de grace.
You beast!
--
Maybe, but I find often we do a lot our of assessing subconsciously when taking
photographs. Especially if we have a lot of experience.
Fred Widall wrote:
I like the doll looking on - wish I could
claim to have planned that but it was pure accident.
--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com
You
I say this with all due respect to both you and Cotty, Frank but I think you'll
have to work _real_ hard to out weird him.
At 11:54 PM 2/22/04, you wrote:
Weird isn't about trying, Tom.
It's a state of being. One just ~is~ weird. It isn't a competition.
That being said, I can outweird Cotty
Just look at it as a self portrait. :)
At 01:32 AM 2/23/04, you wrote:
Even though the camera strap and my foot is in the photo?
LOL
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Hi Shel,
Close2 is my favorite. Great shot.
Paul
On Feb 22, 2004, at 11:20 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Here are a few more from that
Hell, I can tell when my exposures are off based on web images. They just
don't
look right.
At 06:36 AM 2/23/04, you wrote:
I'm not trying to say anything. Much of what I shoot is mere
entertainment. If I think something make an interesting picture, i shoot
it. The exposure is dead nuts right
Beer. (Roughly the same calory count as milk, tastes terrible by the way).
At 01:50 AM 2/23/04, you wrote:
Have you never tried scotch over your corn flakes? Mmm!
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
hehe, naive little fairygirl thought it was OJ! lol - you know like OJ and
scrambled eggs for
Hello all:
Any suggestions for a compact electronic flash unit for my MX? What do you
use and why?
Thanks,
Aaron
But, Ben Lomond (and nearby Loch Lomond) is beautiful in it's own way,
and the Scots recognized early on that similarity to some places back
home. Today they do have some nice pub-style bar/lounges here and
there, and some fine, down to earth individuals, just like they do back home.
keith whaley
If the pup is the center of interest this one is better. But, the wider view
tends to make it more obviously wintery, the cropped one could almost be a cold
day on the beach somewhere.
--
frank theriault wrote:
So, pursuant to one of Boris' suggestions, I've cropped it:
My Sigma 300/4 shows up as Pentax FA* 300/4.5
Christian
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 7:42 AM
Subject: Re: Pentax Complot?
Anyone have problems like this with Sigma lenses.I have Pentax and
Sigmas,just wonder if
it
1 - 100 of 256 matches
Mail list logo
