Larry Cook wrote on 24.11.04 0:39:
Thank you for your inquiry. At this time we are aware of no plans to
develop Pentax (or Minolta) models of the 120-300mm F2.8 lens. Also, the
300mm F2.8 EX lens is being phased out of production.
Sincerely
So if you had been thinking about the 300
WR If it's the Takumar 200/4, it is a very pedestrian lens.
WR I have heard the SMC 200/4 is better, but still not really good.
WR OTOH, I expect the EF100/2.8 macro is one of Canon's better lenses.
WR He should have chosen the EF50/1.7 and the SMCP 105/2.4 for his test.
WR And he should have
Just wondered if any Sydney people knows where I can get some big prints
done from Pentax raw files. Did think of buying an Epson 2200 printer and
doing my own, but figure it might be easier to get it done commercially if
someone would accept files from pentax raw manipulated in Photo shop.
Thanks. Great idea. I don't use masks very often. I have to get more
familiar with that process. I'm going to try this.
Paul
On Nov 24, 2004, at 1:17 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 23 Nov 2004 at 22:56, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Seriously, do you think Shadows/highlights does
things that couldn't be
i suspect, it's kinda difficult to post optical prints on the web.
and as far as that and the lenses go, what you are saying is that the test
is skewed towards D1s, correct?
anyway, a test is just that, a test. i found it interesting since i don't have
either camera and some things i heard wrt to
Sylwek,
You are right about Pentax. The availability of the Sigma 120-300 lens
is the one thing that has caused me to seriously consider switching to
Nikon or Canon. The majority of my current shooting is my son's soccer
which is often at night. I have an 80-200 f2.8 but it is just not long
Hi Tim.
Someone was looking for 645 stuff here not to long ago.They may contact you.
As far as dust on the ccd,some of the istD owners have complained,and i had a
bad problem
with my
D1 but so far not with the D2h.
Zooms actually inhance the problem if they are internal focus,as they tend to
What flash diffusers have you found to be the:
1.) Easiest to use.
2.) Most effective given the ease of use.
3.) Most portable as far as space and sturdiness so they
don't get mangled riding in a crowded bag.
I'm looking for something to use on the AF360FGZ and the AF500FTZ.
Something I'll
Timothy,
I shot for 14 day in the field in Alaska (snow, rain, dirt dust) with my *ist
D, changed lenses many times every day never ran into the dreaded dust on
ccd sensor issue. When I changed lenses, I always shut off the camera, pointed
the body down quickly removed/attached the lenses
The most commonly overlooked fact is that a diffuser is
only as effective as its surface area size. A diffuser same
size as flash tube/reflector will not change the quality
of light ( although some will increase the flash dipersion
angle which is good for wide angle lenses, but you still have
in
Have any of the *istD shooters run into the ccd dust issue and is
it really an issue when switching lenses? So when I get one of the
digital bodies, should I go with a zoom to minimize lens changes? If
yes does anyone want my FA 24, 35 2.0 AF, 77 or FA*300???
Very interested in the FA 35
Don Sanderson wrote on 11/24/2004, 8:38 AM:
What flash diffusers have you found to be the:
1.) Easiest to use.
2.) Most effective given the ease of use.
3.) Most portable as far as space and sturdiness so they
don't get mangled riding in a crowded bag.
I'm looking for something to
TIMOTHY STARK wrote on 11/23/2004, 7:51 PM:
Have any of the *istD shooters run into the ccd dust issue and is it
really an issue when switching lenses? So when I get one of the
digital bodies, should I go with a zoom to minimize lens changes? If
yes does anyone want my FA 24, 35 2.0
Thanks Christian, that's the kind of thing I want...simple.
I well understand the trade-offs between effectiveness/convenience/light loss.
Tissue over the lens and a portable umbrella are at the exteme ends of the
scale.
One doesn't help much and the other I'd never use because it's not
Looking at some new package offers at several camera stores. Some are
offering
more than just
the body and the faj starter lens kit.
Some are giving a choice over faj and DA zooms and some primes.
Have not commited just yet,but i have a choice of 100 macro,da 18-55 fa 50 and
the faj
- Original Message -
From:
Subject: What lens do you find is on your *istD most often
do you have a lens on your D body that seems to be more often than
not.?
The 31mm seems to be my standard lens now.
William Robb
I use the DA 16-45/4 extensively. It's a very good lens. I also use the SMC
50/1.4 and SMC 85/1.8 quite a bit, particularly in the studio.
Paul
Looking at some new package offers at several camera stores. Some are
offering
more than just
the body and the faj starter lens kit.
FA 43/1.9, but only because it's the smallest AF prime I have. I wish I
was more like William.
Tom C.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What lens do you find is on your *istD most often
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:18:11 -0600
I use an omni-bounce quite often. At other times I just use the celing. When
I'm feeling ambitious, I'll use my Larson Sof' Shoulder. It's really an
umbrella reflector. Quite cumbersome but very good. In combination with open
sky, it can give you a very good look that rivals what could be done
FA 50/1.4. Cheap, fast, sharp, and now it's a portrait lens :-)
Amy
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: Re: P67 vs D1s -- photo.net
He should have chosen the EF50/1.7 and the SMCP 105/2.4 for
his test.
And he should have gotten a high end optical print made from
the
film, rather than a scan.
Hi everybody,
About this topic, I performed a film vs.
I always use Lithium. They do cost more, but ultimatley save money in
terms of the effects of stress on my health ;-)
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/20/2004
When was it last time that Pentax released a telephoto lens!?
4 years ago - FA 400/5.6 ? (various cheap 300- zooms don't count).
This is precisely the area where ultrasonic motors and image
stabilization are a de facto standard. I'd like to believe that P is
phasing out current lenses
The lens I find most often on my istD is the 77mm ltd.
I bought the FAJ 18-35 with it as a kit becuase it was
only about $100 more and I could also use it with the
MZ-S if I wanted. I've never used it.
The other lens I will use on the istD is the FA24-90
Wendy
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In order:
1.) SMCP-A 50/1.4 and Tamron AF 28-75/2.8
2.) DA 16-45/4
The first two account for about 90% of the time split equally between them.
The 50/1.4 with F 1.7x AF Converter is my portrait lens of choice.
The 16-45 will see more use this winter and next spring for scenics, IF
the results
It's my understanding that the Camera Raw feature in Elements 3.0 is not as
fully featured as the one for Photoshop. Don't know for sure but it may be
worth looking into.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 11/23/2004 11:06:17 PM
Subject: Re: Some
http://tinyurl.com/6goau
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/11/24/DDGB49QB1527.
DTL
Shel
On the web, the *istD image appears to be far superior. There is considerably
more detail, and it looks sharper.
Paul
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: Re: P67 vs D1s -- photo.net
He should have chosen the EF50/1.7 and the SMCP 105/2.4 for
his test.
And he should have
Dave,
...but do you have a lens on your D body that seems to be more often than
not.?
I've just only 300 frames with mine so far. So my mileage is limited.
The lenses in order of decreasing importance :);
1. FA 28-70/4 (copied that from Jostein's 28-70/2.8) - my carry around
2. FA 50/1.7
Hi Boris
1. Is Photoshop Elements 3.0 out?
Yes. Look here:
http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshopelwin/main.html
2. How do one gets the Camera Raw plugin for Photoshop?
By download. Newest version is 2.3:
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/product.jsp?product=39platform=Windows
3.
Hi.
We're travelling for Thanksgiving so may not respond.
We'll be back next week.
Have a great Thanksgiving.
Collin
I'm going to the auto show in San Francisco on Saturday. Thought I'd take
my 18mm and 24mm, plus perhaps a 50mm for people shots. Anything else
seems too long. Any thoughts on that? Also, figuring on a 400 speed film,
one of the Fujis maybe? Any color film suggestions?
Shel
That's a revealing test, Gianfranco. Thanks.
Was the print from Provia 100F an Ilfochrome print?
Joe
På 23. nov. 2004 kl. 09.45 skrev Rob Studdert:
On 22 Nov 2004 at 21:00, William Robb wrote:
This is a subject worthy of discussion.
For myself, I think a lot of us try to fit our equipment into our
style, rather than shooting the equiment that best suits our style.
Too true, I suspect my A135/1.8
Hi,
manual lens ? I've restored / relubricated a number of my soviet lenses
with MoS2 (molybdenium disulfide) grease. Helicoids and apeture rings
smooth as ... you name it :)
CRC KPF 2 K-30 is what I have, but some of my fellows are also used
other MoS2 greases with great success. That
Still not entirely honest though you made a better effort than most of
the Digital vs Film
testers who get published. I think the additional fine detail you see
is an artifact of the
sharpening process. Still the difference in cost per. print, and the
rough equivalence of
output is a
Of course! The DA 16-45 f4. This is a superb lens, and certainly one of
a handful of Pentax's best zooms ever. If you use zooms and can afford
it, get it. The DA 18-55 will not be as good: Note the difference in
price, and be guided thereby.
Most used prime? It's a toss-up between the FA 31
The *ist-d image is smoother and shows no die clouds. The extra detail
is due to contrast and brightness of that particular image and has been
slightly sharpened. Still the *ist-D image speaks very well for the
camera and eloquently makes the case for digital image capture.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have been using Adorama's strobo-sock (or some such name). It is a
fine white sock that slips over any flash head and is attached by
elastic. It diffuses the light nicely, with an exposure cost of 1 EV.
Two to a pack. Only problem: the elastic breaks. Because of that, I now
have a Stofen
why wasn't a fine grain color PRINT film used?
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 11:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Film vs. Digital - A necessary test
Still not entirely honest though you made a better
I notice that Sigma's 800 f5.6 is no longer listed either. New versions
optimized for digital will be forthcoming?
Joe
Don Sanderson wrote:
What flash diffusers have you found to be the:
1.) Easiest to use.
2.) Most effective given the ease of use.
3.) Most portable as far as space and sturdiness so they
don't get mangled riding in a crowded bag.
I have included a Lumiquest Pocket Bouncer in my walking-around kit,
Ciao,
If you were to enlarge the digital to the same size as
the film, what would the comparison look like?
This would, of course, be useful in evaluating
equivalent enlargements.
That is my primary interest.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the web, the *istD image appears to be far
Gianfranco Irlanda wrote:
What do you think?
My reading: the *istD wins hands down in terms of noise/grain. In terms
of resolved detail, it's less clear-cut due to sharpening issues etc,
although the digital image certainly doesn't look any worse in that
respect. The digital image looks like
do you have a lens on your D body that seems to be more often than
not.?
Well, I don't ~yet~ own a *ist D or a *ist DS, but (this being
Thanksgiving time here in the US and all), I would just like to say
that I am very grateful that I will ~eventually~ be able to answer
your question with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/24/2004, 5:09 AM:
do you have a lens on your D body that seems to be more often
than not.?
Sigma 300/4 APO Macro but I shoot wildlife mostly.
--
Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
På 24. nov. 2004 kl. 16.09 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The DA 18-55 seems nice,may go that route, although i have the 28-105
PZ zoom,so maybe the
100,but do you have a lens on your D body that seems to be more often
than not.?
FA 50 1.4 most of the time, just like the 85 1.4 was on the LX.
It depends how badly I want the item. If I really want it, I snipe by
placing my maximum bid in the last few seconds of an auction. If I
don't want it as much, or if there's a lot of them on eBay, I'll place
a smaller than maximum bid early on and then forget about it. If I
win, I've got it for
Thanks for posting the test information and results. I hope to do
something similar at some point, and your efforts and the feedback you've
received will help in setting up my test.
Your desire to use the same magnification for each image is understandable,
but perhaps it would have been a
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Your desire to use the same magnification for each image is understandable,
but perhaps it would have been a better test to use the same size prints
for the test. Most people ask for a print of a certain size, not of a
certain magnification, and the results may have been
A 12x18 v an 8x12? Yep that levels the playing field don't it? How about you put
them both up on the wall, stand on the other side of the room, and tell us which
looks better (grin)?
Back when the high-res digitals first came out I downloaded one of the images
and printed it 8x10. I took that
I have an Omni-Bounce, but mostly I use a Lumiquest Soft box with the
Pentax AF400T (much more powerful flash). This unit is much bigger
than the Omni-Bounce and seems to soften light better.
Bruce
Wednesday, November 24, 2004, 6:40:32 AM, you wrote:
C Don Sanderson wrote on 11/24/2004,
Quoting William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- Original Message -
From:
Subject: What lens do you find is on your *istD most often
do you have a lens on your D body that seems to be more often than
not.?
The 31mm seems to be my standard lens now.
William Robb
The
Not being a testing maven I respect all comments and positions. They all
seem to have merit. As noted, I may do a similar test at some point. What
suggestions are there from the list as to the most useful testing
parameters? Here's what I was thinking:
1) Using lenses that provide about the
Any quick suggestions as I take on the 'official photographer' role
for a local 5K race tomorrow morning? 1,200 runners so far...
Regards, Bob S.
Kodak Portra 400VC is rapidly becoming my favorite 400-speed color
film for shooting like this. Most of the consumer-grade 400 speed
color film I've tried has had too much contrast for my taste. If
you're shooting w/o flash, you'll have some color correction issues to
deal with, so be aware of
Hi Shel,
I think you have it exactly right. My only reservation might be number 4.
Perhaps it would be better to have a top pro lab produce the best possible
print from each format. That might very well be a wet print from the negative
and an inkjet print from the digital file. But I'm not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mused:
Do you have a lens on your D body that seems to be more often than not?
For walking around, the 28-105(PZ).
For motorsports, the 80-200/2.8
FA20-35 so far but that was after a disappointing start with the DA16-45.
My DA16-45 had an overexposure problem just recently diagnosed by Bruce
Dayton as the aperture not closing properly. Thanks Bruce.
The DA16-45 should be a favorite. I like the FA20-35 very much and the
DA16-45 is a little
Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: Re: Film vs. Digital - A necessary test (to Ciao)
Ciao,
If you were to enlarge the digital to the same size as
the film, what would the comparison look like?
Hi Jack,
'Ciao' means 'Hi' in Italian, my name is Gianfranco (read like
Junfrankoh, as
Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a revealing test, Gianfranco. Thanks.
Was the print from Provia 100F an Ilfochrome print?
Hi Joe,
Yup, an Ilfochrome Classic print, made by a pro lab (specialist
for slide processing and printing).
Gianfranco
=
_
Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your desire to use the same magnification for each image is
understandable,
but perhaps it would have been a better test to use the same
size prints
for the test. Most people ask for a print of a certain size,
not of a
certain magnification, and the
Of course, I'm not sure on #4 either. My thought was to use a process
that's typical and considered, more or less, a standard. Maybe using a
Frontier with Crystal Archive is neither. By standard I don't mean the
best, but a point by which other options may be judged. IAC, it would
seem, and
Seeing is in the eye of the bee-holder.
mike wilson wrote:
H. November evening at the back of Sunderland Civic Centre,
February evening on the coast in Hawaii.
No, can't see the resemblance at all. 8-)
Ciao..THANKS for name correction,
If you were to use a zoom lens and carefully capture
the same scene dimensions and enlarge the two images
to the same print size, the lens magnification
preferences would then be the only variable. If you
did this, I wasn't astute enough to pick it up.
Jack
---
-Original message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:11:39 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: What lens do you find is on your *istD most often
The DA 18-55 seems nice,may go that route, although i have the
On Nov 24, 2004, at 5:41 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
Hmm, pics or comments didn't do too much for me, again a strange
comparison. If
it shows me anything it is that the 200/4 for the P67 is a pretty poor
performer, CA is really pronounced.
That's funny, because I thought the 4000 ppi scan on the
Well, that sounds good since you apparently have someone who knows how
to operate the Frontier machine. Perhaps an ISO 400 film would be best,
since that's neither slow nor ultra fast. And the *istD is frequently
used at ISO 400. If you shoot ISO 200 with the *istD, your choices of
film are
http://www.fredmiranda.com/A18/
some ideas plus examples...YMMV
All suggestions welcome, doesn't matter whether it's something to buy or
build.
TIA
Don
I suspect my A135/1.8 will be hitting the bay some time soon for just
this reason.
How much do you expect to get for it. I´ve just
been offered to buy one for $500. According the
seller it is like new minus...
DagT
Just buy it... Or give me the seller's email!
Andre
På 24. nov. 2004 kl. 22.08 skrev Jon Glass:
On Nov 24, 2004, at 5:41 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
Hmm, pics or comments didn't do too much for me, again a strange
comparison. If
it shows me anything it is that the 200/4 for the P67 is a pretty poor
performer, CA is really pronounced.
That's funny,
Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you were to use a zoom lens and carefully capture
the same scene dimensions and enlarge the two images
to the same print size, the lens magnification
preferences would then be the only variable. If you
did this, I wasn't astute enough to pick it up.
Jack,
My
On 24 Nov 2004 at 9:18, William Robb wrote:
The 31mm seems to be my standard lens now.
I'm with Bill but I do wish I had something a bit wider that was the same
speed.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
På 24. nov. 2004 kl. 22.23 skrev Andre Langevin:
I suspect my A135/1.8 will be hitting the bay some time soon for just
this reason.
How much do you expect to get for it. I´ve just been offered to buy
one for $500. According the seller it is like new minus...
DagT
Just buy it... Or give me the
On 24 Nov 2004 at 17:32, DagT wrote:
How much do you expect to get for it. I´ve just been offered to buy
one for $500. According the seller it is like new minus...
Yeah, buy it, buy it now. I wouldn't sell mine for twice that.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)
On 24 Nov 2004 at 22:08, Jon Glass wrote:
On Nov 24, 2004, at 5:41 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
Hmm, pics or comments didn't do too much for me, again a strange
comparison. If
it shows me anything it is that the 200/4 for the P67 is a pretty poor
performer, CA is really pronounced.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
do you have a lens on your D body that seems to be more often
than not.?
Hi Dave,
My standard lens on the D is the Tamron Di 28-75/2.8.
Then, in decreasing order:
M 20/4
FA 35/2 (in low light this is my first lens of choice)
K 135/2.5
Sigma EX 70-200/2.8
Good stuff, thanks!
Don
-Original Message-
From: Feroze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 3:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Flash Diffusers, what do you use?
http://www.fredmiranda.com/A18/
some ideas plus examples...YMMV
All suggestions
On 24 Nov 2004 at 7:44, Gianfranco Irlanda wrote:
What do you think?
Personally I think that if I were making a similar print comparison I would use
print film for one and lenses for each format that produced the same final AOV
on the same sized paper. It seems to me that you partially
Just a note on the differences in Photoshop CS and Phtotoshop Elements 3.0
raw converters.
According to the info in Fraser's Real World Camera Raw.. the Raw
converter uses a custom profile for each camera model. The calibrate tab
in the Photoshop CS tab is intended to let you fine tune that
strange, but i do agree with Shel here.
basically, taking the same logic to extreme, one can take a picture on 4x5 film
and on a 3/2 digital camera (6.6x8.8mm) -- say, 35mm lens on both.
now, how much sense would make the images of same magnification from both?
best,
mishka
On Wed, 24 Nov
On 24/11/04, Collin Brendemuehl, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hi.
We're travelling for Thanksgiving so may not respond.
We'll be back next week.
Have a great Thanksgiving.
Thanks but I don't do Thanksgiving.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On 24/11/04, Graywolf, discombobulated, unleashed:
Which is better, and apple or and orange.
An Apple :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
I can recommend purchasing Phase One LE or SE for batch RAW conversions.
Brilliant software.
Allso BreezeBrowser (app. 50 USD) has a qiute nice built-in RAW converter.
All the best
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Shel
On 24/11/04, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
I had a
filthy sensor made worse when I used a bulb-blower that, unknown to me,
my 18 month old daughter had been sticking up her nose and sucking snot
out, and ended up blowing baby snot all over the inside of my camera.
ROTFL!!
Gross!
On 24/11/04, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed:
Any quick suggestions as I take on the 'official photographer' role
for a local 5K race tomorrow morning? 1,200 runners so far...
After a million close-ups of runners, boredom will set in. Switch to a
wide angle and pap a few at close
Sounds reasonable to me!
keith
Cotty wrote:
On 24/11/04, Collin Brendemuehl, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hi.
We're travelling for Thanksgiving so may not respond.
We'll be back next week.
Have a great Thanksgiving.
Thanks but I don't do Thanksgiving.
Cheers,
Cotty
My most used lenses with the *ist D are (lives in my bag) are:
Tokina AT-X 270AF ProII
Pentax A 2.8/20mm, Pentax FA 1.4/50mm,
Pentax K 2.8/105mm, Pentax K 2.5/135mm, Pentax M*4/300mm, Pentax-F 1.7x AF
Adapter
I'm now looking at a Sigma f2.8/18-50mm to replace the Tokina 28-70mm, which
has a
On 24/11/04, Larry Cook, discombobulated, unleashed:
You are right about Pentax. The availability of the Sigma 120-300 lens
is the one thing that has caused me to seriously consider switching to
Nikon or Canon. The majority of my current shooting is my son's soccer
which is often at night. I
Ok, this is the last Pinnacles shot I will share. I tried to not
sharpen as much when downsizing this one, as a few mentioned that
previous ones looked unnatural.
Anyway, Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4, circular polarizer, handheld:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/pinnacles_0026.htm
Comments welcome.
So if I got an *ist Ds, could I stick a A 20mm or A 24mm f/2.8 on it and
it'll work without anything fancy? Just thinking in terms of a very
small, compact carry-cam, a digital HCB machine with manual focus and
aperture priority..
Not anytime soon, but maybe next year.
Cheers,
Cotty
On the Avenue, August 2004:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2907524size=lg
On 24/11/04, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
On the Avenue, August 2004:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2907524size=lg
There's a bit of Robert Frank in that. I like it.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
i second: an apple.
mishka
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 23:16:08 +, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24/11/04, Graywolf, discombobulated, unleashed:
Which is better, and apple or and orange.
An Apple :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Yes. You'll get all the metering modes with an A lens. The *istD is
definitely a good walkaround camera with a compact lens mounted. If you
recall, there was a discussion on thePhoto.net Leica forum about ten
months ago regarding the *istD and how it would be a good solution for
those who
Thanks Cotty. It's snowing in Michigan tonight and there aren't many
photo ops, so I started digging through the summer's culls and found
this one. I'm printing it as I type. I kind of like it as well, if I do
say so myself.
Paul
On Nov 24, 2004, at 6:38 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 24/11/04, Paul
I really like this one. I guess because I feel up so close when
viewing, it is as if I am there. Great job!
Bruce
Wednesday, November 24, 2004, 3:35:44 PM, you wrote:
PS On the Avenue, August 2004:
PS http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2907524size=lg
On 24/11/04, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
es. You'll get all the metering modes with an A lens. The *istD is
definitely a good walkaround camera with a compact lens mounted. If you
recall, there was a discussion on thePhoto.net Leica forum about ten
months ago regarding the
On 24/11/04, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Thanks Cotty. It's snowing in Michigan tonight and there aren't many
photo ops, so I started digging through the summer's culls and found
this one. I'm printing it as I type. I kind of like it as well, if I do
say so myself.
Don't get
On 24 Nov 2004 at 23:35, Cotty wrote:
So if I got an *ist Ds, could I stick a A 20mm or A 24mm f/2.8 on it and
it'll work without anything fancy? Just thinking in terms of a very
small, compact carry-cam, a digital HCB machine with manual focus and
aperture priority..
You'll get better
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
