On Oct 2, 2006, at 10:58 AM, DagT wrote:
Strange!
Not only did they know my previous password, they changed it as
well...
They don't know anything. It's just the software reacting to
something.
Either you´ve pushed some wrong button or we have a security problem.
Neither. Let's not
Does anyone have experience with this camera, Please?
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.407 / Virus Database: 268.12.11/460 - Release Date: 10/01/2006
--
*Pentax* Shows X-Change Hybrid Digital SLR Concept at Photokina 2006
http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/digital-cameras/pentax-shows-xchange-hybrid-digital-slr-concept-at-photokina-2006-204631.php
Gizmodo.com - Budapest,Hungary
Pentax refined one of its earlier concepts at Photokina 2006 with its
Looking at the responses so far, it seems that most of the Europeans get it and
most of the Americans don't. Must be a cultural thing.
From: Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/02 Mon PM 10:00:33 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Street photograph
At 03:30 PM 3/10/2006, you wrote:
From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/02 Mon PM 11:11:40 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT - Freelance Life, Here I Come
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 19:33:02 +0100, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Cotty
From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/02 Mon PM 11:11:40 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT - Freelance Life, Here I Come
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 19:33:02 +0100, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On 2/10/06, Simon King,
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/03 Tue AM 01:43:46 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Back, and I have no class
In a message dated 10/2/2006 4:19:56 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Paul,
you're quite right about Marnie, and I'm sure she has more
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/03 Tue AM 07:37:47 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT - Freelance Life, Here I Come
At 03:30 PM 3/10/2006, you wrote:
From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/02 Mon PM 11:11:40 GMT
To:
On 3/10/06, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
See: http://www.dalsa.com/markets/ccd_vs_cmos.asp
Excellent article, thanks
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
Strange, you are right!
I just thought the drawing of the truck and the bike was a little funny .-)
Anyway, thanks to everyone for watching and commenting.
DagT
PS: The picture is of the main street in Oslo, close to the royal castle, the
old university buildings and the national theater, and
I got it, and think it's a nice, humorous photo, in many ways typical of
Dag's work.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: mike wilson
Looking at the responses so far, it seems that most
of the Europeans get it and most of the Americans
don't. Must be a cultural thing.
Thanks Shel!
DagT
Fra: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I got it, and think it's a nice, humorous photo, in many ways typical of
Dag's work.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: mike wilson
Looking at the responses so far, it seems that most
of the Europeans get it and most of
Thanks Bill, the Spit's pretty much my favourite too.
Eric.
On 01/10/06, Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NICE!
My favorite warbird is the Spit
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric
Featherstone
Sent: Sunday, October 01,
Christian wrote:
Bob W wrote:
Who's John Dvorak that anyone should take any notice of him? That
article is so shallow it's laughable.
Am I missing something? Shallow? In what way? He wrote what I've been
saying for a long time. Every photograph is a manipulation of the
truth. How is
Thanks Paul, I'm glad you and Grace liked them.
Eric.
On 01/10/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enjoyed these. Thanks for sharing. My granddaughter Grace, who's an
airplane lover, found them fascinating.
Paul
On Oct 1, 2006, at 5:48 PM, Eric Featherstone wrote:
At the beginning
Thanks Adam!
Eric.
On 02/10/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gorgeous stuff, especially the FAA Corsair in Pacific Theater paint.
-Adam
Eric Featherstone wrote:
At the beginning of September I went along to the Spitfire Anniversary
Air Show at Duxford. Not many Spitfires
On 02/10/06, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Featherstone wrote:
At the beginning of September I went along to the Spitfire Anniversary
Air Show at Duxford. Not many Spitfires actually flew because of high
winds but there were plenty of other displays. I've put together a
small
On 01/10/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Featherstone wrote:
At the beginning of September I went along to the Spitfire Anniversary
Air Show at Duxford. Not many Spitfires actually flew because of high
winds but there were plenty of other displays. I've put together a
small
Thanks Bruce. Yes, I had fun. But I'm glad I don't have to do it every
day:-).
Paul
On Oct 2, 2006, at 11:23 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Some fun shots, to be sure. I like the first and third best. Looks
like there is still some life left in film.
--
Bruce
Monday, October 2, 2006, 7:07:18
The shots have some blown highlights because there are some peripheral
areas in direct sun, for example in the background of the pic with the
pumpkins. But the main light is provided by the flash and softbox, so
the exposure had to be based on those. Any film or digital would show
some blown
On 02/10/06, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/2/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've only got half a bee. His name is Eric...
Hmmm...
If only there were a song we could sing about Eric the Half a Bee.
I've got my fingers in my ears; I can't hear you! ;-)
Eric.
I think you'll like it.
I was not particularly enamored of the DA21's ultra-compact lens
shade ... I use an Olympus lens shade for a 28mm f/3.5 OM system
lens, which helps me keep my fingers off the lens a lot better.
Godfrey
On Oct 3, 2006, at 3:43 AM, Michael Abbott wrote:
Thanks guys.
On Oct 3, 2006, at 1:21 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Taken at dusk at Muir Beach near San Francisco.
Pentax *istD, Tokina AT-X 400/5.6, Tripod
ISO 800, 1/350 sec @ f/9.5
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3484a.htm
It's a good scene. The lighthouse is a little small in the
composition but
Paul wrote:
I did as I had threatened, and shot a couple of rolls of Portra
VC 160
at the local Farmer's Market. I used the 6x7 with the 165/4 Leaf
Shutter lens and the AF 400T flash with a Lumiquest Softbox. I
like the
fill from the softbox, particularly in the shot of the kids
On Oct 2, 2006, at 8:34 PM, John Celio wrote:
How about if I took a small strip of the backing paper and taped it
into
place on the inside of the cartridge?
I somehow doubt it would work properly. Despite the clumsy, huge
cartridge, the internals are pretty tightly controlled for
Who or what entity publishes this: http://pentaxlife.com/
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
It's done by a guy on the DPReview.com Pentax SLR forum. Don't know
much else.
Godfrey
On Oct 3, 2006, at 11:56 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Who or what entity publishes this: http://pentaxlife.com/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Yes, I fiddled with them for quite a while. There's just not much in
the scan. I had to push them hard to get rid of an overall muddiness. I
might be able to tweak the scan adjustments and get something better,
but it may just be due to the limited range of the flatbed.
Paul
On Oct 3, 2006, at
Nice job.
Which college are you doing this at Mike. I'v been looking for years.
Dave
Quoting Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/images/jocelynshort5-1window.jpg
I've been taking a portraiture course through my local community
college. This was for an
Metro Community College in Edmonton. Peter Sellers is the instructor.
He's realy good at teaching, as well as Photography. I've really
enjoyed it.
Mike
On 10/3/06, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice job.
Which college are you doing this at Mike. I'v been looking for years.
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 01:35:10 -0400, you wrote:
David Mann wrote:
On Oct 3, 2006, at 10:42 AM, Michael Perham wrote:
Well, I just turned 67 and I don't ask my wife anymore. I simply
informed
her I was pre-ordering my K10D.
If you're 67 you should be going medium format ;)
But what does he do
Oh, i thought you were in Ontario, sorry.
Which accent is Paeter using.;-)
Dave
Quoting Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Metro Community College in Edmonton. Peter Sellers is the instructor.
He's realy good at teaching, as well as Photography. I've really
enjoyed it.
Mike
On
Bluebottle.
Dave
On 10/3/06, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, i thought you were in Ontario, sorry.
Which accent is Paeter using.;-)
Dave
Quoting Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Metro Community College in Edmonton. Peter Sellers is the instructor.
He's realy good at
On 02/10/06, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/1/06, Eric Featherstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the beginning of September I went along to the Spitfire Anniversary
Air Show at Duxford. Not many Spitfires actually flew because of high
winds but there were plenty of other
On 02/10/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 1, 2006, at 10:48 PM, Eric Featherstone wrote:
At the beginning of September I went along to the Spitfire Anniversary
Air Show at Duxford. Not many Spitfires actually flew because of high
winds but there were plenty of other
There are obvious areas where highlights could not be controlled,
you're absolutely right. I was looking more at skin tones and hair, on
the guitarist, for example.
I found the high contrast Kodak UC highlights very difficult to
control. I also, wanted to acknowledge the problem you may have been
On 02/10/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
At the beginning of September I went along to the Spitfire Anniversary
Air Show at Duxford. Not many Spitfires actually flew because of high
winds but there were plenty of other displays. I've put together a
small gallery. Comments
Yes, I see what you're saying. Those highlights are probably the result of my
pushing the curve to eliminate muddiness. I'd love to have a Nikon Coolscan
8000. They're much less expensive than they once were, but I just don't shoot
enough film to justify it.
Paul
-- Original
I guess you mean the Corsair? I know very little about them (and the
Hellcat) other than they played a huge part in the Pacific Theatre.
Cheers,
Eric.
On 02/10/06, Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I love # 139. Now THAT was an airplane!
Dan
On 10/1/06, Eric Featherstone [EMAIL
Ditto!!!
I really thought that without either one the photo would fall apart.
On 10/3/06, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strange, you are right!
I just thought the drawing of the truck and the bike was a little funny .-)
Anyway, thanks to everyone for watching and commenting.
DagT
PS:
Mmm I don't think that this is what Ken told us some time ago.
I thought that in any cas (whetever which one came with the optical
design) both brands were designing their barrels by themselves.
2006/10/3, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Joseph Tainter wrote:
Also, all three new Pentax DA* lenses
Note the last VC of WW2 was won by a Corsair IV pilot in the Pacific,
Robert Gray, a Canadian from 1842 squadron. One of his squadron mates
would be the last Canadian casualty of WW2 later that same day. The
Corsair is probably the most famous Allied fighter from the Pacific
theater, and it
On 10/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I see what you're saying. Those highlights are probably the result of my
pushing the curve to eliminate muddiness. I'd love to have a Nikon Coolscan
8000. They're much less expensive than they once were, but I just don't shoot
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Mark - I'm the one that had the 12X18 prints.
So you remembered the prints but not me!
I'm glad you remembered they were VERY impressive prints VBG.
Funny - I was about to write Mark that it was you, Ken - but
I wasn't there
this past year so :)
ann
--
PDML
If you're 67 you should be going medium format ;)
With a Sherpa ! ;+}
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 1:14 AM
Subject: Re: Enablement
On Oct 3, 2006, at 10:42 AM,
On 10/3/06, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're 67 you should be going medium format ;)
With a Sherpa ! ;+}
Cesar? You listening?
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
Shoot more film!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I'll soon, hopefully, be in a position to tell myself the same thing.
Have fantasy shopped for a scanner for quite awhile.
That pressure has recently lifted. WHEW!!
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I see what you're saying. Those highlights are probably the
result of my pushing the
As Tokina guys said - those lenses are solely designed by Pentax,
optical elements and coatings will be 100% identical for both Samsung
and Pentax. Tokina lenses will have the very same optical elements (and
coatings), but NOT Pentax electronics. Nowadays those chips are quite
important...
Which, just by the way, means that people who shoot other brands will
have easy access to Pentax lenses *and coatings*.
Pentax to the masses ;-).
On 10/3/06, Margus Männik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As Tokina guys said - those lenses are solely designed by Pentax,
optical elements and coatings
Mark Roberts wrote:
Wow. I just thought of some other WWII trivia that's been kicking
around my brain for who-knows-how-many years: Tomorrow, 4 October,
marks the. 62nd (had to stop and work it out) anniversary of
the first time a jet aircraft was shot down in combat. The jet was,
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 10:25:58 -0400, you wrote:
Note the last VC of WW2 was won by a Corsair IV pilot in the Pacific,
Robert Gray, a Canadian from 1842 squadron. One of his squadron mates
would be the last Canadian casualty of WW2 later that same day. The
Corsair is probably the most famous
The image posted there
(http://pentaxlife.com/files/2006/10/samsung-star-lenses.jpg) made me
think about something:
The lenses shown on that picture seem to stay verticaly very nicely
(without rear cap). Is that a sign indicating no mechanical coupler
anymore? Maybe it is just hidden (hole in the
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 11:17:48 -0400, you wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Wow. I just thought of some other WWII trivia that's been kicking
around my brain for who-knows-how-many years: Tomorrow, 4 October,
marks the. 62nd (had to stop and work it out) anniversary of
the first time a jet
Only one other brand is using the K mount these days. Not like the
glory days of the past when every small manufacture rather than
developing their own mount would adopt the K mount.
Boris Liberman wrote:
Which, just by the way, means that people who shoot other brands will
have easy access
Christian wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Wow. I just thought of some other WWII trivia that's been kicking
around my brain for who-knows-how-many years: Tomorrow, 4 October,
marks the. 62nd (had to stop and work it out) anniversary of
the first time a jet aircraft was shot down in
Mark Roberts wrote:
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 11:17:48 -0400, you wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Wow. I just thought of some other WWII trivia that's been kicking
around my brain for who-knows-how-many years: Tomorrow, 4 October,
marks the. 62nd (had to stop and work it out) anniversary of
the
In a message dated 10/3/2006 12:43:39 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, all their other dishes did look like haute cuisine. But frank has
a
point, shrimp on toothpicks?!? That was my reaction too. I swear the waiter
looked somewhat dubious when he brought it to
In a message dated 10/2/2006 9:08:05 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 9/30/06, J and K Messervy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Again captured in the back yard with the Sigma 50mm macro.
http://tinyurl.com/fogj5
Any constructive criticism welcome.
James M
=
Great
I wonder what would happen with the Pentax/Samsung relationship if Sam
decided to make a dslr with the actuator for older K lenses. Iknow I would
seriously consider a Samsung if it had full compatibility with older K
lenses.
Jim A.
From: Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss
Funny - I was about to write Mark that it was you, Ken - but
I wasn't there
this past year so :)
Neither was I Ann, I was there in 05.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Who had the 13 x 19 photo album from Light Impressions?
I get the truck and the bike - I didn't know the stones were
new or how clean or dirty the street was
this might work better as a BW, Dag
I did get a chuckle out of it.
There are areas in the US where there are new cobble stones
- most often red brick in
places where they have intentionally
Boy - talk about clutching at straws!
You might as well ask what would happen if Nikon made a
K-mount body; I'd say that's more likely than a Samsung
(designed for the masses without any Pentax history) with
a mechanical aperture sensor.
The Samsung bodies do, of course, have the *actuator*;
There's a cobble stone street in Newport Rhode Island, called Brick
Alley, The cobblestones appear to be mostly made of granite. I'll have
to look closer next time I'm there.
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I get the truck and the bike - I didn't know the stones were
new or how clean or dirty the street
On 10/2/06, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, Frank, it's Disneyland and a broad with no class. You have a
French name. That makes you a gourmet.
Don't laugh. I've gotten much mileage with that name.
cheers,
le knarf
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
On 10/2/06, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Taken at dusk at Muir Beach near San Francisco.
Pentax *istD, Tokina AT-X 400/5.6, Tripod
ISO 800, 1/350 sec @ f/9.5
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3484a.htm
Comments welcome
Lighthouse is actually a misnomer. They're quite heavy.
So would I. I expect that we'll see that, when sensor technology is
cheap enough, from Cosina.
Jim Apilado wrote:
I wonder what would happen with the Pentax/Samsung relationship if Sam
decided to make a dslr with the actuator for older K lenses. Iknow I would
seriously consider a Samsung if
On 10/3/06, keith_w [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, in that case, you're BOTH wrong.
His ongoing tirade about how photographs are simply not any truth at ALL, is
wearing, and of itself, untrue.
People who think of photos taken of Uncle Joe and Aunt Mattie, and passed
around for family to
I've searched for some pics of the battery that will be used in the K10D
that show the front of the bat where the connections are. Couldn't find
any, but maybe someone here has or knows of such a pic and can provider a
pointer to it. Also, I'd like to see a pic of an NP-400 showing the same
view
Cute puppy. Looks like it was fairly overcast? 2613 of the rugweaver is
an interesting shot and I like the composition.
Tom C.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax Discuss PDML@pdml.net
Subject: GESO: What I did on my summer
I don't think Pentax would permit it LOL
Forget it ... forever !
2006/10/3, Jim Apilado [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I wonder what would happen with the Pentax/Samsung relationship if Sam
decided to make a dslr with the actuator for older K lenses. Iknow I would
seriously consider a Samsung if it had
Ahh... that's what all those FF sensors are being cut up for... stupid idea
if you ask me, on many levels.
Tom C.
From: Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Pentax Shows X-Change Hybrid Digital SLR Concept at Photokina 2006
I've added four images to my portfolio at Photo.net:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/member-photos?user_id=266609
They are all shot in august this year with the Pentax 645NII and the
Pentax645 33-55/4.5 lens close to home.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5030349
This is a four
I ran into a strange situation when I took some pics recently with my
K100D. I converted the RAW into DNG using Pentax Photo Browser, then I
imported them into ACR (CS2) and proceeded to adjust them. I noticed
however, that the white balance, which was set to As Shot or something
like that,
All four are very nice! Love the sky in the third one. Hard to pick a
favorite of the four.
The effort was worth it.
Tom C.
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Some more images...
Date:
Gonz wrote:
I ran into a strange situation when I took some pics recently with my
K100D. I converted the RAW into DNG using Pentax Photo Browser, then I
imported them into ACR (CS2) and proceeded to adjust them. I noticed
however, that the white balance, which was set to As Shot or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've added four images to my portfolio at Photo.net:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/member-photos?user_id=266609
They are all shot in august this year with the Pentax 645NII and the
Pentax645 33-55/4.5 lens close to home.
On 10/2/06, Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've since taken everyone's suggestions to heart and sharpened the
eyes a bit to bring them out. I also reduced the appearance of the
labret scar. Sadly, there was no PS tool to raise the height of my
camera in relation to the subject...
I'll have to check that. I'm probably using the older one since I have
not updated in a while.
rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gonz wrote:
I ran into a strange situation when I took some pics recently with my
K100D. I converted the RAW into DNG using Pentax Photo Browser, then I
imported
It's interesting when you can take photos of birds from above them...
http://www.mindspring.com/~morephotos/PESO_--_withfurtheregret.html
Technical Info.:
Pentax *ist-Ds ISO 800 @ 1/1000sec (Av) (-1.0EV)
smc Pentax F 70-210mm f4.0~5.6 @ 210mm f11.0
Note: Maybe -1.0 EV wasn't enough exposure
Hi!
I've added four images to my portfolio at Photo.net:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/member-photos?user_id=266609
Stunning!
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 9/30/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Dave,
That's the bugger.
Bad choice of words, Jostein (recognizing, of course, that as English
isn't your first language, you may not know what bugger is slang
for).
I should write you off list.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a
Godfrey wrote:
I haven't seen much evidence to say that their CCD sensor
products (Pentax, Nikon, KM aka Sony, Olympus, etc) do better or
worse than the Canon CMOS sensors do in any way that is significant
to a purchase decision.
Well, IIRC a CMOS chip is much cheaper, I believe, althoug the
It is that dog sled mail up there. 3+ years? That is truely snail mail.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject:
On 10/2/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did as I had threatened, and shot a couple of rolls of Portra VC 160
at the local Farmer's Market. I used the 6x7 with the 165/4 Leaf
Shutter lens and the AF 400T flash with a Lumiquest Softbox. I like the
fill from the softbox,
Well stated Keith!
Especially the part about Bob W. and Christian being ~both~
wrong. LOL
Keith's wrong about us both being wrong. Keith and Christian are both
wrong, so obviously you're wrong about Keith being right - he's wrong.
Right?
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 10/3/06, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's interesting when you can take photos of birds from above them...
http://www.mindspring.com/~morephotos/PESO_--_withfurtheregret.html
I think that's One Terrific Shot, Peter.
Unfortunately, that horrible pun in the title completely
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ann Sanfedele
Sent: 03 October 2006 17:23
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO - Street photograph
I get the truck and the bike - I didn't know the stones were
new or how clean or dirty
Thanks Frank. They leave something to be desired both in terms of subject and
rendering, but I had some fun with film.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10/2/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did as I had
Bob W wrote:
Keith's wrong about us both being wrong. Keith and Christian are both
wrong, so obviously you're wrong about Keith being right - he's wrong.
Right?
Bob
Wrong.
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 10/3/06, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Keith's wrong about us both being wrong. Keith and Christian are both
wrong, so obviously you're wrong about Keith being right - he's wrong.
Right?
I have a French surname. The French are never wrong. As for the
others, I really don't care. Along
http://home.earthlink.net/~ebay-pics/famousfoto.html
Shel
-
Been there, done that. More than once. Will probably do it again.
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In the early spring of 1972 I bought my first 4x4, a Dodge Rancharger.
Within a few days, and with a couple of friends, I headed for the woods. I
was brash and foolish, and this was the result.
But, to compound the situation, the friends who took the pic made some
posters of it, and sent them
On 10/3/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the early spring of 1972 I bought my first 4x4, a Dodge Rancharger.
Within a few days, and with a couple of friends, I headed for the woods. I
was brash and foolish, and this was the result.
But, to compound the situation, the friends
Fabulous photos, Pal!
Rick
--- Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've added four images to my portfolio at Photo.net:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/member-photos?user_id=266609
They are all shot in august this year with the
Pentax 645NII and the
Pentax645 33-55/4.5 lens close to
http://free.grisoft.com/doc/2/lng/us/tpl/v5
Googling avg free gave that link. The download is on the upper right.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
John Forbes wrote:
I recommended AVG
On 10/3/06, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is that dog sled mail up there. 3+ years? That is truely snail mail.
The sled only took about 2 1/2 years. The rest of the time was
chipping through the ice of Bill's igloo.
cheers,
frank
ps: all Canadians live in Igloos by law.
--
Sharpness
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~ebay-pics/famousfoto.html
What's the brown thing that looks like it has been spat out of the exhaust?
If you can remember that far back
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Hmmm, mirror image? Look at Dodge on the hood and the steering wheel.
Fun story.
On 10/3/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the early spring of 1972 I bought my first 4x4, a Dodge Rancharger.
Within a few days, and with a couple of friends, I headed for the woods. I
was brash
That reminds me of my younger brother when he first bought a 4x4. He
took his 3 boys out for a drive in it. When he saw a huge pile of road
grit in a layby he yelled Let's go off-road, boys and promptly
grounded himself on the apex of the grit pile, with all 4 wheels
spinning in the air. He had to
On 10/3/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the early spring of 1972 I bought my first 4x4, a Dodge Rancharger.
Within a few days, and with a couple of friends, I headed for the woods. I
was brash and foolish, and this was the result.
But, to compound the situation, the friends
1 - 100 of 206 matches
Mail list logo
