That's outrageous. I'm going to write my congressman. I'm fairly
conservative on most issues, but this is ludicrous. Why don't they go
after real child pornographers? I can't believe it. We should all
respond to this.
Paul
On Dec 2, 2006, at 1:05 PM, Bob Shell wrote:
I find this very
We're ready and braced for five grand children and wonderful chaos.
Jack
K10D, 16x45, 100ISO
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=204
Cheap talk?
Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone
I had wished for this here on the pdml, about the istD, a couple of years ago:
The front (index) wheel will advance through pictures when in play
mode. No need to use the joystick thing to do that if you don't feel
like it.
It's a trivial thing, but shows a level of attention to detail that I
- Original Message -
From: Rick Womer
Subject: Re: new subscriber
I'm not sure this wasn't spam.
Just a man of few words.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: K10D: Another Studio Example
I had to shoot some more ad materials today for contest entries. This
was with the K10D at ISO 100 with studio strobes, ff16 @ 1/180th in X
exposure mode. Two monolights. Here's the full image:
Does the AF-500 have an autoflash function? If so, it should work
relatively well. Of course you can use the guide number as well, but
full power isn't nice if you don't bounce it off of something.
Paul
On Dec 2, 2006, at 1:24 PM, David Savage wrote:
On 12/3/06, Mark Cassino [EMAIL
MacOS-X *IS* unix under the hood with a sexy interface. Much
better. Windows blows in pretty much all ways.
They're just as unwashed, though they use a more expensive
cologne/perfume to cover it up :-)
I don't think I'd say that. MacOS-X is a true unix (although not
a
I can't believe this. How depressing.
Paul
On Dec 2, 2006, at 2:08 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
No, its time for you to shut the hell up.
I didnt say this was something to not
buy the camera for because SR is a bonus
feature that can be turned off or just
go ahead and shoot quick without it,
Thanks Bill. I'm liking it too. And it's without a tripod (I'm lazy)
but with SR turned on.
Paul
On Dec 2, 2006, at 7:51 PM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: K10D: Another Studio Example
I had to shoot some more ad materials today for contest
Yes, the 12-24 is clearly an amazing lens, probably the best DA thus
far. It will be a good companion to the 16-50.
Paul
On Dec 2, 2006, at 4:36 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
12-24 to cover wide, use your 21-35 for normal.
-Adam
John Francis wrote:
I was almost convinced I wanted the 16-45 until
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 05:45:22PM -0600, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Michael Chan
Subject: Re: 16-50 f2.8
John,
I have a 10-17 and love shooting with it. It's an awesome lens. I'm
continually impressed with what it produces, but it is a fish with
Agreed. This pleased me as well.
Paul
On Dec 2, 2006, at 7:46 PM, Juan Buhler wrote:
I had wished for this here on the pdml, about the istD, a couple of
years ago:
The front (index) wheel will advance through pictures when in play
mode. No need to use the joystick thing to do that if you
Good point Tim. I don't use tinyurl as often as I should. I should
also rewrite my php photo album program to be more url friendly.
Michael
On Dec 2, 2006, at 5:39 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
TinyURL.com is the answer. Pretty strait forward to use.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Very nice. Happy Holidays!
Paul
On Dec 2, 2006, at 7:46 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
We're ready and braced for five grand children and wonderful chaos.
Jack
K10D, 16x45, 100ISO
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=204
Agreed. Although my flash shoe adapter wasn't all that much. About
twenty bucks if I remember corectly. A Promaster I think. It works. I
leave it on the end of my studio flash PC cord. That way it's still
just a one move attachment. But, yeah, the camera should have had a
PC connection.
Very nice Paul. If my panoramic calendar shots get as good next year I'm
happy.
Did you try from a higher angle as well to get the text on the card in the
backgorund a bit better readable/sharper?
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark,
My lady and I want to go to the UK. I need to talk with you soon
about travel ideas. Big plus: she digs motorcycles. *grin*
On Dec 2, 2006, at 4:07 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Michael Chan wrote:
I have a 10-17 and love shooting with it. It's an awesome lens. I'm
continually
On Dec 2, 2006, at 4:46 PM, Juan Buhler wrote:
I had wished for this here on the pdml, about the istD, a couple of
years ago:
The front (index) wheel will advance through pictures when in play
mode. No need to use the joystick thing to do that if you don't feel
like it.
It's a trivial
William Robb wrote:
The format command is a bit deeper in than I like. I would prefer it on
the Fn menu somewhere.
Why would you ever need to use the format command? Every new flash card
I've ever seen comes pre-formatted. And even if not that's only once per
card, ever.
If (as I guess) you
TinyURL.com is the answer. Pretty strait forward to use.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Michael Chan
Sent: 3. desember 2006 00:40
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: 16-50 f2.8
Sorry
He's sick Paul,
more functional than 'the who',
but still not right in the head.
Emotionally crippled by something...
Regards, Bob S.
On 12/2/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't believe this. How depressing.
Paul
On Dec 2, 2006, at 2:08 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
No, its
I begin to wonder a bit:
with the transition to digital most of you seem to like Zooms now where in
the analog world most of you used primes for best results.
What happened here?
just wondering
Markus, who still uses film for a few weeks :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Jack
I have no children but will try to make some night shots of Santa Clause
today in evening here when he meets the children at the school.
I will use the Pentax M50mm 1.2 on a manual Pentax and the A85 1.8 and ISO
400 film on a monopod for some close-ups of Santa's face.
I tried that last
I offer this as proof of what SR can do; it's a partial repost from
another thread earlier, but the point is that SR is a boon, not a bane.
(.. omitted .. )
(re-posted begins)
http://209.197.126.178/IMGP3102.jpg
The exif data is partially wrong because it's a non-recognized lens.
SR is on,
Fit and finish is more of the same compared to the istD, but the overall
feel is improved by the way the card and battery doors open. I never
liked the doors on the istD, I was always afraid of breaking them.
Yeah agreed, the doors are much nicer than the *istD ones.
I find the latches a bit
* The MTF programme line still refuses to use all apertures on my primes
(ie, no F1.4 on the FA50/1.4)
That's what MTF prog. should do. It is choosing the aperture based on
what gives the better (i.e., sharper) result. The MTF value for F1.4
is low so the camera it is going to avoid this
On 12/3/06, Cory Papenfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MacOS-X *IS* unix under the hood with a sexy interface. Much
better. Windows blows in pretty much all ways.
They're just as unwashed, though they use a more expensive
cologne/perfume to cover it up :-)
I don't think
I still like primes. I shot all my studio stuff today with the FA
50/1.4, and I frequently shoot on the street with the 35/2. That's
also my favorite for indoor people pics. But a lot of the best new
Pentax lenses are zooms. some of them are excellent. No reason not to
use them. I'm going
Yes - reading the manual I just now got to the part about the custom
setting option for cancel AF - I thought he was talking about the
AF/MF switch.
Yeah, switching to MF on the lever thing works as expected. I had hoped
switching to MF with the AF button would do the same; sort of like a
Me either.
Maybe I should read the manual :-)
Dave
On 12/3/06, Rod Connan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't :-)
Thanks for the tip as I have been going in on the fn menu to check - duh
Rod
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Michael
Markus Maurer wrote:
I begin to wonder a bit:
with the transition to digital most of you seem to like Zooms now where in
the analog world most of you used primes for best results.
What happened here?
I'm sticking with my primes. I got the 16-45/4 because when I got the
*ist D I didn't have
Ditto.
And the zoom staying the say as you scroll through shots. Handy when
evaluating focus.
Dave
On 12/3/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed. This pleased me as well.
Paul
On Dec 2, 2006, at 7:46 PM, Juan Buhler wrote:
I had wished for this here on the pdml, about the
Seeing as we're talking about half pressing the shutter, is that
another bad pun?
If so, I shutter at the thought.
Dave
:-)
On 12/3/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't believe this. How depressing.
Paul
On Dec 2, 2006, at 2:08 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
No, its time for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/12/06, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
Note to Pentax: I'd like a PC terminal on the next camera you put in
front of me, and you may as well put an aperture simulator in it as
well,
That the sound of hell freezing over?
No, it has a little
Wo-hooo!
I won a local auction for a SMC-K 1.8 85mm.
Allegedly in excellent condition.
222 USD is a bargain, right?
Some times I love the fact that Petnax is greatly underestimated around here
:-)
I can't wait to get my hands on it!
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
--
No virus found in
Not me. I like primes period.
Trouble is, with a 1.5X crop factor, all of the older
primes we already own are longer now than we'd like
(even if there are some advantages to turning a 400mm
in a 600mm, and so on).
So, I can either sell the great primes I own, or
invest in the DA Pentax primes.
Puddle deep.
Dave
On 12/3/06, Norm Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Deep, incredibly deep...
Norm
William Robb wrote:
Don't give your dogs home made dog buscuits in the evening if you want
to sleep in the next morning..
The photofinishing game is kinda fun if you are working for
On 12/3/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Rick Womer
Subject: Re: new subscriber
I'm not sure this wasn't spam.
Just a man of few words.
William Robb
Won't fit in well here then.
Dave (trying finish off his word quota before the end of
Someone did mention it.
I too hope they can add this feature.
Dave
On 12/3/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did someone mention, awhile back, that Pentax was considering a program
change to the K10D that would permit wireless flash operation with
either a 360 or 540 which would be
Or try putting the link inside brackets
http://www.mcmm.net/viewimage.php?set=lost_lake_august_2006i=IMGP1773.jpgs=m
Dave
On 12/3/06, Michael Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good point Tim. I don't use tinyurl as often as I should. I should
also rewrite my php photo album program to be more
That is debatable. My ears can not tell the difference either way. Both
are definitely better than mp3, however guess which is the most popular?
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
That's funny, I have kept my 3000+ LP collection
to listen to them ( although I do like the covers
too ) because they
I picked mine up today at Henry's in Kanata (nr Ottawa)
They had quite a few pre-orders and only a couple of cameras come in.
The person who had ordered this one decided not to take it so one of
the staff rang me at about 4pm to see if I wanted it.
I just moved out of my old house and the first
There are some who would say you should move your personal assets to an
offshore bank where the laws do not even allow their own government to
attach someones account (are there any such left in the world?) just so
a business failure will not put your family in the poor house.
Unfortunately
What do I get? Good photography ;-)
Everything works as it should.
Running XP Home and Firefox.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom
C
Sent: 1. desember 2006 20:15
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject:
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 02:54:57AM +0100, Markus Maurer wrote:
I begin to wonder a bit:
with the transition to digital most of you seem to like Zooms now where in
the analog world most of you used primes for best results.
What happened here?
Back in the film days I still used zooms, mostly.
Can set's my mind free. That's Eurorock at its best.
Sadly I only have them on LP. The stylus is broken at my turntable, and it
is a MC pickup so it is pretty expensive to replace.
My wallet can't feed both my LBA and my love for music fully :-(
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
I see your point Boris.
Perhaps it is me. My mind needs something to chew at to be let loose. I did
not find that in this photo, therefore my comment. Does it make sense now?
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 12:46:26PM +1030, Peter Loveday wrote:
* The MTF programme line still refuses to use all apertures on my primes
(ie, no F1.4 on the FA50/1.4)
That's what MTF prog. should do. It is choosing the aperture based on
what gives the better (i.e., sharper) result.
Looks great, awesome detail and lighting. Only nitpick is that the
reflection on the black surface bothers me. Try black velvet or some
other non-reflecting surface, that would give you richer blacks.
rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had to shoot some more ad materials today for contest
Wendy!
You're back on the Pentax side? Or just dabbling?
Paul
On Dec 2, 2006, at 9:42 PM, wendy beard wrote:
I picked mine up today at Henry's in Kanata (nr Ottawa)
They had quite a few pre-orders and only a couple of cameras come in.
The person who had ordered this one decided not to take it
Have fun
William Robb
-
Funny thing, Bill, this is my like and slightly diskike list almost exactly.
As for the AF switch, I think some engineers had too much time on their
hands. This change was unnecessary. I could operate the slider switch
without looking away from the viewfinder.
This is a bronze sculpture of a wrecked jetty in the sculpture gardens of
the National Gallery in Canberra, Australia.
I'm glad of the sealed body on the K10D as the mist was getting into
everything.
http://tinyurl.com/uonnk
Cheers
James
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Best DA zoom, As good as it is, I'm more impressed by the DA limiteds.
-Adam
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Yes, the 12-24 is clearly an amazing lens, probably the best DA thus
far. It will be a good companion to the 16-50.
Paul
On Dec 2, 2006, at 4:36 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
12-24 to cover wide,
Thanks Gonz. Anything better is too expensive. Stuff I shoot for work
gets shot on seamless paper rolls. They don't want to pay any more
than they must.
Paul
On Dec 2, 2006, at 10:21 PM, Gonz wrote:
Looks great, awesome detail and lighting. Only nitpick is that the
reflection on the black
True. I don't own any of the DA Limiteds. Hope to add the 70 sometime
soon.
Paul
On Dec 2, 2006, at 10:25 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
Best DA zoom, As good as it is, I'm more impressed by the DA limiteds.
-Adam
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Yes, the 12-24 is clearly an amazing lens, probably the best
I hope it's a bargain:-). I'm hoping to sell mine for enough to
purchase a DA 70.
Paul
On Dec 2, 2006, at 9:42 PM, Jens Bladt wrote:
Wo-hooo!
I won a local auction for a SMC-K 1.8 85mm.
Allegedly in excellent condition.
222 USD is a bargain, right?
Some times I love the fact that Petnax is
I'm shooting primarily with zooms because I'm still building my prime
collection and Pentax doesn't yet make a couple of the primes I'd want
(especially a 16mm f2.8). And the two zooms I use are inexpensive and
excellent (16-45 and A 70-210). They make for a good ultra-light kit as
well, when
Manual flash is quite easy on digital as well.
-Adam
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Does the AF-500 have an autoflash function? If so, it should work
relatively well. Of course you can use the guide number as well, but
full power isn't nice if you don't bounce it off of something.
Paul
On Dec
I decided to re-visit a few more PESOs that people have suggested
changes to, in the past few months. The most recent come first. in this
group.
The first a few suggested would look better if part of the subjects out
of focus hair was cropped out so I decided on a square crop.
Before:
Nice.
In camera B/W filter or converter later? And how?
-Brendan
--- J and K Messervy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a bronze sculpture of a wrecked jetty in the
sculpture gardens of
the National Gallery in Canberra, Australia.
I'm glad of the sealed body on the K10D as the mist
was
Thanks mate. The BW conversion was done in PS CS2 with the channel mixer.
I mucked about with trying to add grain but didn't like the results, so I
left it as is.
- Original Message -
From: Brendan MacRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday,
There's a DA70!?
I can't keep up with all the new Pentax stuff anymore. If it's as good as
the 77mm it's just great.
I hope to get the K10D sometime next year. By then it is a little cheaper
and still a great camera. I need the speed and the better resolution
(crop-ability), less noise etc.
I am
In that case you should turn off auto-ISO, and/or take the camera
off the MTF program setting. The engineers haven't decided that
1/15 at F2 is better than 1/30 at F1.4; they have just provided
a program line which will allow you to declare that MTF is the
most important thing. But only if
As for the AF switch, I think some engineers had too much time on their
hands. This change was unnecessary. I could operate the slider switch
without looking away from the viewfinder. With this thing, I have to
look at it. Maybe practice will help.
I think the change of AF switch was probably
Sounds like an especially enjoyable event and the single candle lit
shot you describe had to be very satisfying under such circumstances.
Best of luck this season. Chosen lens sounds perfect.
Jack
--- Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jack
I have no children but will try to make some
Once you spend about $1000 or more on a phono
rig or a CD rig, the phono rig will whoop the
CDS ass.CD only gets so good as you go
up the scale, while analog just gets better and
better as you spend spend spend money money money
on the gearIt takes a high end playback
system to allow the
- Original Message -
From: Markus Maurer
Subject: RE: 16-50 f2.8
I begin to wonder a bit:
with the transition to digital most of you seem to like Zooms now
where in
the analog world most of you used primes for best results.
What happened here?
just wondering
Unsharp Mask.
Here are some more pictures from the snowstorm.
Used the new K10D this morning, 7:30-8:30 AM.
Included a 100% crop from one of the pix.
http://picasaweb.google.com/rf.sullivan/Snowstorm02
Regards, Bob S.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
G'day All,
I had a visitor earlier this morning which kindly sat for a portrait:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/PESO/peso_023.htm
Comments, criticisms, yawns all welcome.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
P. J. Alling wrote:
I decided to re-visit a few more PESOs that people have suggested
changes to, in the past few months. The most recent come first. in this
group.
The first a few suggested would look better if part of the subjects out
of focus hair was cropped out so I decided on a
Nice, Jack. I just wish the background was more obscure.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: Weathered Post
Took the K10D out for its first short drive. Sorta felt like it did
many years back when I shot all directions just to see
- Original Message -
From: Peter Loveday
Subject: Re: Some random thoughts on my K10D
* The MTF programme line still refuses to use all apertures on my
primes
(ie, no F1.4 on the FA50/1.4)
That's what MTF prog. should do. It is choosing the aperture based
on
what gives the
You might check into QuadToneRIP. Since it doesn't use the Epson
driver, I believe it will print to an arbitrary length on roll paper.
BW only, though.
Godfrey
On Dec 2, 2006, at 8:18 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Yes, that's what I've found in my experiments this morning. I'm not
going to
I did a bit of testing with the SD-CF adapters I have. The maximum
throughput I was able to obtain with them was about 2.5 Mbytes per
second, which is slower than even the *ist D write speed. I think
that's equivalent to about a 16x card.
Godfrey
On Dec 2, 2006, at 6:27 AM, George Sinos
Check the first four messages in the thread to see all the images.
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=21115774
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
ah - if I go into firefox or explorer I can see them -- just not in netscape
so I avhe to cut and paste links.
I like 3 and 5 the best --
very pretty - I love the snow
ann
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Here are some more pictures from the snowstorm.
Used the new K10D this morning, 7:30-8:30 AM.
Included
Every once in awhile, I think about selling mine, because I am not
getting enough use out of it. Then I take it out and make some
pictures with it. I conclude that I should hang on to it. It is a
very nice lens.
Thanks for the comment.
--
Bruce
Saturday, December 2, 2006, 9:20:10 AM, you
Well, I won't be getting rid of the Canons just yet, but you could say
I'm back :-)
If the K10D's as good as I hope, it might make me give one of them the
shove. Funnily enough it was a 10D I stepped over to Canon for in the
first place.
Wendy
On 12/2/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicely seen and captured.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: J and K Messervy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: peso - art imitating death
This is a bronze sculpture of a wrecked jetty in the sculpture gardens of
the National Gallery in Canberra, Australia.
I'm glad of the
On Dec 2, 2006, at 9:53 AM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
Time to dump all that open source stuff and join the great unwashed.
R i g h t Every time I'm forced to use Winders due to some
obscure engineering app that only runs on it, I'm absolutely
*AMAZED* at
hot completely shitty it is
Couple of things to consider - the kit lens only goes as wide as 18mm
- the 16-45 goes to 16. That is somewhat like comparing 24mm to 28mm
in the film 35mm arena. So the wideness is noticeable. On top of
that, it is a constant f4 aperture while the kit lens is variable from
3.5 to 5.6. So the
I think the change of AF switch was probably more a body sealing thing
than anything. Sliders must be a little more tricky than rotating switches.
- Peter
-
Ah...I hadn't thought of that. Thanks, Peter.
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
So is it your birthday, old man? If so, happy birthday! I like the
spider, but I wish it had more DOF.
Paul
On Dec 2, 2006, at 11:37 PM, David Savage wrote:
G'day All,
I had a visitor earlier this morning which kindly sat for a portrait:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/PESO/peso_023.htm
Almost hard to tell it is a boat. This is the kind of shot where I
think many visits over time might be worth it. Different lighting,
time of day, season, etc. could yield some interesting results.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, December 2, 2006, 9:35:10 AM, you wrote:
PJA This little
Some nice pics. Very good sharpness on the crop.
Paul
On Dec 2, 2006, at 11:36 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Here are some more pictures from the snowstorm.
Used the new K10D this morning, 7:30-8:30 AM.
Included a 100% crop from one of the pix.
http://picasaweb.google.com/rf.sullivan/Snowstorm02
If you set the camera to make DNG files, you can open them in Camera
Raw using Photoshop Elements 5.
My K10D is waiting for me in California... Motivation to get home.
I'm in Louisiana now, though, having visited two of my photographic
friends (in North Carolina and New Orleans) on the way
I use prime lenses almost exclusively. The only zoom lens I use is
the FA20-35, which is as good or better than most 20, 24, 28 and 35mm
primes.
Zoom lenses, no matter how good, just don't do things as well for me
in general.
Godfrey
On Dec 2, 2006, at 5:54 PM, Markus Maurer wrote:
I
Nice to see it was thoughtful enough to sit on a nice contrasting
background. ;+}
Just wish the foremost leg was a tad more in focus.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: Birthday Guest
G'day All,
I had a visitor earlier this
And the point here is?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: High ISO Comparison Shots: K10D and *ist D
Check the first four messages in the thread to see all the images.
On 12/3/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So is it your birthday, old man? If so, happy birthday!
Thanks Paul. I'm in the last year of my 20's.
I like the spider, but I wish it had more DOF.
Me too. But there was fly screen behind it that would have looked like
bad moire if I'd gone
either that or some very minimalist aski(sp?) art...
CW
- Original Message -
From: Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 6:51 PM
Subject: Re: new subscriber
I'm not sure this wasn't spam.
Rick
--- Cotty [EMAIL
My essential lens kit now is:
DA14/2.8
FA20-35/4
DA21/3.2
FA35/2
FA50/1.4
FA77/1.8
FA135/2.8
I'm considering selling the FA77 for a DA70 (but the FA77 is very
nice...), and will probably update the 35 and 50 to the new DA lenses
when they appear. The only 'hole' in my lens kit now is a
David - does that mean you are a co-sagitarian?
exactly a week for now I'll be 70 - seems hard to believe
Very pretty spider... nice shot... do we know her/his particulars?
ann
David Savage wrote:
G'day All,
I had a visitor earlier this morning which kindly sat for a portrait:
Couldn't make heads nor tails of it, although I could see that the
exposures were obviously not equal.
Paul
On Dec 2, 2006, at 11:57 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
Check the first four messages in the thread to see all the images.
I think I'm one of the few on the list who appreciate
selective DOF in macro shots. To me they're often much
more interesting this way. I believe this shot is a
good example of this.
Great shot, Dave. Happy B'day.
-Brendan
--- Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice to see it was
On 12/3/06, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David - does that mean you are a co-sagitarian?
exactly a week for now I'll be 70 - seems hard to believe
Indeed I am. (41 years 7 days between us)
Very pretty spider... nice shot... do we know her/his particulars?
Sorry I haven't a clue
In those situations, Shel, you turn SR off. It is of little value
anyway as it is primarily useful with short lenses usually used for
street photography at extended exposure times greater than 1/15 second.
I used a Konica Minolta A2 and Panasonic FZ10/LX1 this way rather a
lot, only turning
Hi!
I begin to wonder a bit:
with the transition to digital most of you seem to like Zooms now where in
the analog world most of you used primes for best results.
What happened here?
just wondering
Markus, who still uses film for a few weeks :-)
Markus, let me try to give you my answer
Beautiful Bob.
I haven't tried it yet on the K10D, but that FA 28-105 PZ is a very nice lens.
Dave
On 12/3/06, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here are some more pictures from the snowstorm.
Used the new K10D this morning, 7:30-8:30 AM.
Included a 100% crop from one of the pix.
The 'wonderful' *istD does that too. I can tell you in practice that
it is hit and miss. I used to use it when doing fill flash during
daylight for weddings and portraits. Problems that I encountered were
that sometimes it would not fire the main flash - it seemed to do with
how bright it was
201 - 300 of 323 matches
Mail list logo
