Fernando wrote:
I know some people here is anxiously waiting for this lens:
http://surfdoc.blogspot.com/2009/02/sample-shots-with-da-35f28-ltd-and-da.html
I still maintain that good ol' A 50/1.2 is way better than this lens
;-). Though of course one has to oneself these things that are done
Okay, the tree was too messy, too cluttered -- so digging further back in
the archive.
Part of my Mom at 90 series. (I think I've shown about 5-6 of these on list,
I must have about 75-100, so I am pretty positive I have not shown this
one). Naturally these cannot be reshot.
At one point
On 27/2/09, Christine Aguila, discombobulated, unleashed:
What is the story behind Frank the rabbit ears? I saw a picture someone
showed a way while back with Frank in rabbit ears--it was at GFM he wore
these, right? Is there more to the story then just wearing the ears?
Cheers, Christine
Ask
In a message dated 2/28/2009 12:30:12 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
cotty...@mac.com writes:
On 27/2/09, Christine Aguila, discombobulated, unleashed:
What is the story behind Frank the rabbit ears? I saw a picture someone
showed a way while back with Frank in rabbit ears--it was at GFM he
You could argue that the M8 would be my next step but I don't want to
move down ;-)
The cocking of the shutter does it for me oh yeah baby.
On 27/2/09, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
Yes, I think Leica need to rethink the shutter use on the M8 and M8.2. On
the M8 it cocks the shutter
Everything Bob Walkden said about the pleasures of books is and will
continue to be true. It's also beside the point: It won't stop the
advancement of electronic books any more than the pleasures of film
stopped digital cameras.
It's a false analogy. People have a very different
On 28/2/09, Derby Chang, discombobulated, unleashed:
Oh no, the humanity The 2.5 display comes at a terrible cost. The
thing is not longer articulated :(
固定式2.5型液晶モニター
means Fixed 2.5-inch LCD monitor
http://www.epson.jp/products/colorio/photoviewer_digitalcamera/rd1xg/
Missed that when it was posted - it's a wonderful shot, absolutely timeless
and full of joy.
I was going to complain about the snow being without any
texture, but
now think it's great the way it is - kids floating (and falling) in
space...
On Feb 27, 2009, at 08:58 , DagT wrote:
In a message dated 2/28/2009 12:39:52 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
p...@web-options.com writes:
It's a false analogy.
Bob
=
I agree. I've been thinking that all along but didn't know how to put it.
You put it very well.
Marnie :-) Apples and oranges.
Hi Everyone:
It was a $itch of a day out at the construction site: very, very cold,
damp, and flurries. But the drilling continued on the 1st caisson for the
super-structure (indoor parking garage student services building) as well
as dumping cement and the drilling for the 2nd caisson
I still maintain that good ol' A 50/1.2 is way better than this lens
;-). Though of course one has to oneself these things that are done
automatically nowadays.
Here is a sample:
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2009/02/baby-anat-starts-to-smile.html
Shot at f/2.0 with a bit of
In a message dated 2/27/2009 1:56:47 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
pnstenqu...@comcast.net writes:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=8647234size=lg
=
Definitely not what I was expecting. Made me chuckle, fun shot. And the
colors are good too.
Marnie :-)
Excellent set of photos, Christine. I particularly like the one of the guy
fitting the trough to the cement truck.
I did a bit of labouring on a site in Bordeaux in 1976. It's hard work, but
lots of fun when concrete is being poured. The worst bit is having to get
inside the cement mixer to clean
In a message dated 2/27/2009 7:25:01 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
ramar...@mac.com writes:
I see this scene every time I go out on walks. Today the light seemed
to enforce the mood of desolation and distance: I tried to capture its
gritty essence.
In a message dated 2/28/2009 12:52:51 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
cagu...@earthlink.net writes:
Very nice series of shots, I especially like 1, 3, and 13. And I really,
really like 14. He looks stalwart. Heh.
Worked out much better than last time. I find, for myself, sometimes I don't
do
Having said all that, I should think that some segments of the reading
public would welcome these electronic readers. I imagine they would appeal
to some sci-fi and perhaps fantasy readers. That might be a good thing
because it would clear the shelves of that stuff, and make room for proper
2009/2/28 Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au:
Subash wrote:
hi,
will be of interest to quite a few here i think...
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0902/09022701epsonrd1xrangefinder.asp
regards, subash
Oh my, oh my. The adolescent need to complete the collection is, ahem,
rising.
Staying
David Savage wrote:
2009/2/28 Graydon o...@uniserve.com:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 01:21:02PM +0900, David Savage scripsit:
That's the process Paul. The more accurate comparison would be:
viewing photos on screen (monitor or digital picture frame) or in
print.
Which do you prefer?
For what
eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
Electronic
devices will never be big sellers with anyone having any kind of reading
problem and with those for whom the language is not their primary language but a
secondary language.
??? Those people will be major beneficiaries of the technology.
They also
Boris Liberman wrote:
Fernando wrote:
I know some people here is anxiously waiting for this lens:
http://surfdoc.blogspot.com/2009/02/sample-shots-with-da-35f28-ltd-and-da.html
I still maintain that good ol' A 50/1.2 is way better than this lens
;-). Though of course one has to oneself
Bob W wrote:
Everything Bob Walkden said about the pleasures of books is and will
continue to be true. It's also beside the point: It won't stop the
advancement of electronic books any more than the pleasures of film
stopped digital cameras.
It's a false analogy.
It's not a false analogy,
I'm not really arguing against the future of electronic books, I rather believe
that they will mostly do away with traditionally printed media. I'm just saying
that I think that that will be one of the most foolish things we humans will
have done in our history.
~Nick David Wright
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 12:36:54AM -0500, eactiv...@aol.com scripsit:
I also seriously think that more and more we will forgo electronic
devices that require charging and more and more go in favor of
devices that don't use energy.
Creating a book costs lots of energy; it costs more to ship
I'm relatively young, I just held my 30th birthday in December. I much prefer
looking at a real print instead of having to boot up this infernal machine to
log on to the internet to look at pictures.
~Nick David Wright
http://pedalingprose.wordpress.com/
- Original Message
From:
Herein lies one of my biggest peeves about digital photography.
The photographer does not have any control over how the print looks when it is
displayed.
I put some of my best shots on the web a couple years back. On my
fully-calibrated screen they looked wonderful. I went to my
Hi gang
Just thought i would pass this on, Erin was hurt riding a clients
large pony last night around 4pm.
The horse reared up, with her on its back, but kept on going and she
landed on Erin.
Ambulance ride to Markham-Stouffville hospital, X-rays and Cat scan
showed two small fractures, one in
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Mark Roberts msrobert...@ysu.edu wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Feb 27, 2009, at 3:16 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
... Mass production books will soon be a thing of the past.
Possibly.
Print on demand books like these from blurb.com and other vendors seem
Boris,
Beautiful, like Bob W said!
Nice to see your little boy growing up.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
I still maintain that good ol' A 50/1.2 is way better than this lens
;-). Though of course one has to oneself these things that are
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 02:04:16PM +0900, David Savage scripsit:
2009/2/28 Graydon o...@uniserve.com:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 01:21:02PM +0900, David Savage scripsit:
That's the process Paul. The more accurate comparison would be:
viewing photos on screen (monitor or digital picture frame)
Dave,
Our best to Erin and here's hoping for a quick recovery.
Don't be afraid to kick some butt over at the Hospital/Doctor
to get what you need. Sometimes they are 'out to lunch.'
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 7:00 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi gang
Just
I like the framing of this one.
http://faculty.ccc.edu/caguila/caisson/content/caisson_drilling_feb_27_84_large.html
Dave
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 3:48 AM, Christine Aguila
cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:
Hi Everyone:
It was a $itch of a day out at the construction site: very, very cold,
Good mood, and i like the geometry to this one/
Dave
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi ramar...@mac.com wrote:
I see this scene every time I go out on walks. Today the light seemed to
enforce the mood of desolation and distance: I tried to capture its gritty
essence.
Nice composition, and colours.
Dave
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=8647234size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
Lovely shot. The solid white gives it a dream effect.
Dave
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:58 AM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
Lots of snow in Oslo now .-)
http://foto.no/linkeddata/bildekritikk/images/44-440999/440654_1280x1024.jpg
K20D, da*16...@50, 1/125s, ISO200 and f/9
DagT
--
Marnie,
That's a touching photo, and well convieved and shot.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 2:29 AM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
Okay, the tree was too messy, too cluttered -- so digging further back in
the archive.
Part of my Mom at 90 series. (I think I've shown about 5-6 of
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 12:27 AM, ann sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
...more Stenquestian than moi...
but there were special circumstances..
http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2607384_N3Nso/1/480279687_EreMs/Medium
that was the dark side camera... however...
That is a very good
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
Lighting and exposure of John is spot on! I'd be very happy with it too.
Jack
I cannot be more in agreement. Well done Frank.
Dave
--- On Fri, 2/27/09, frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
From: frank
WOW. Great light, pose and composition.
I'm putting that one in your best 4-5 shots.
Dave
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 2:18 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi ramar...@mac.com wrote:
A moment's quiet, this little girl and her sister were having a grand time
dashing about the cafe when she stopped for a moment
That 'got me' Marnie. Maybe the lighting on the near hand could be taken down
slightly to befit a more nostalgic mood..or not. Ideally, the digits on the far
side could be sharper. Had there been a wedding ring visible...
Beautiful as is!
Jack
--- On Sat, 2/28/09, eactiv...@aol.com
Me too. Lets see who gets theirs first.:-)
Dave
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Bill Owens wmbow...@gmail.com wrote:
I chose standard delivery and mine left Portland, OR, this morning via FEDEX.
Bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Very nice.
The 50-135 fits in a pocket.:-)
Dave
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
We've had steady fog for days, which normally keeps the camera in the
pocket. This is a 4-second (!) shot with the 50-135. Yes, it really
was that colour:
Like these very much
Dave
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com wrote:
Very nice beach shots. I especially like the one on the left.
On Feb 27, 2009, at 13:01 , Toine wrote:
We enjoyed a short holiday at the beach:
http://www.repiuk.nl/shells/
K20D DA35
Wonderful, powerful.
Good job
Dave
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 3:29 AM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
Okay, the tree was too messy, too cluttered -- so digging further back in
the archive.
Part of my Mom at 90 series. (I think I've shown about 5-6 of these on list,
I must have about 75-100, so I
Christine,
Love the guy with the auger in 15. Really shows the scale/size and
messyness of drilling.
3, 5, 14 16 are also favorites, mainly for the people.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 2:48 AM, Christine Aguila
cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:
Hi Everyone:
It was a $itch of a day
Both shots very well composed and exposed.
I like the idea of the market window adds in the first, especially as it
relates to the photo.
Scaffolding and traffic light work well together..for some reason.
Both beautifully crisp, Ann.
Jack
--- On Fri, 2/27/09, ann sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
Very much enjoyed the set, Christine. Lighting looks pretty good to me and I
couldn't help but notice how aware the workers were of your camera.
This reminds me of the threats my parents used to make as to my fate if I
didn't do my homework and pay attention in class.
Certainly all well seen.
Well, my digital photography efforts are more directed toward the
print rather than the computer monitor. And my printing workflow is
more accurate and more efficient than it was with film. In other
words, my digital output is comparable to that of what film provided.
Similarly, the best
I am back in eBay selling and buying mode. As part of that, I have
been tracking a few auctions and have a better idea what the going
prices might be on a few items.
The following will go on eBay within the week unless anyone here
wants to give them a good home. Some of these I had
Stan, what's the filter size on the FA 300? Do you have an example photo you'd
care to post? How about a shot of the area showing the scuff marks.
Thanks,
Jack
--- On Sat, 2/28/09, Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
From: Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info
Subject: FS:
I have a copy of Langhorne's Plutarch that was printed and bound in
1810, and it's in better condition than the vast majority of the books
I purchased in the seventies. They knew how to make them back then and
cost was no object. (The covers are calf and the spine is gilt.)
Today's books
On Feb 28, 2009, at 1:20 AM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 2/27/2009 7:56:08 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
pnstenqu...@comcast.net writes:
Film is forever. When we're old and breathing our last, we'll all
make
one last stand in the darkroom, breathe the pungent fumes of
I like them. The first is an excellent portrait, the second an
interesting juxtaposition.
Paul
On Feb 28, 2009, at 12:27 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
...more Stenquestian than moi...
but there were special circumstances..
On Feb 28, 2009, at 3:39 AM, Bob W wrote:
Bookshops have survived the onslaught of Amazon because book people
love
bookshops.
Perhaps that's true in the UK. In the US, bookshops are on the verge
of extinction.
Paul
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Thanks Marnie. I can't recall the day, but I did shoot this in a park
where the folks were having a picnic. I guess they were anticipating
rain.
Paul
On Feb 28, 2009, at 3:58 AM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 2/27/2009 1:56:47 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
Sorry to hear that David. I hope she heals quickly. I understand your
pain as well and know how terrible it is to see your child suffer. Do
your best to keep her spirits up, as hard as that may be.
Paul
On Feb 28, 2009, at 8:00 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Hi gang
Just thought i would pass
Nice set. Nine, six and three are my favorites, but they're all well
framed and rendered.
Paul
On Feb 28, 2009, at 8:31 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
I like the framing of this one.
http://faculty.ccc.edu/caguila/caisson/content/caisson_drilling_feb_27_84_large.html
Dave
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009
A great shot. This worked very well. The imagery comes through loud
and clear. It's well framed and beautifully rendered. Excellent in
every way.
Paul
On Feb 28, 2009, at 8:47 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Wonderful, powerful.
Good job
Dave
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 3:29 AM, eactiv...@aol.com
From: Tim Bray
I agree. There are more pleasures in reading than just reading. The
physicality of the book is important.
Thanks Bob, really nicely put.
All your aesthetic arguments are convincing, with the exception of
weight-in-the-hand; many books are just too damn big and heavy.
None of
- Original Message -
From: Doug Franklin
Subject: Re: on paper
And what monitor, for that matter? As I sit here, I do my primary work
and all of my photo editing on a Samsung 955DF CRT monitor that apparently
came out of the box calibrated to match my Epson 820 printer (or
- Original Message -
From: Doug Franklin
Subject: Re: shooting green
Interesting. Where I first heard of it was about 1977 or so. The local
and state law enforcement types were using it to spot marijuana plots in
the local state and federal parks and forests. Apparently,
On 28/2/09, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
Just thought i would pass this on, Erin was hurt riding a clients
large pony last night around 4pm.
Best wishes to Erin, get well soon!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Joseph McAllister wrote:
Aha! You do understand how well politics, social responsibility and
economics work together! :-)
The intersection of intelligent thought on those three topics is empty. :-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 27/2/09, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
I don't care about volume. I care about books and the stories they
carry. They are as much a part of my life as breathing.
I never saw you breathe once when you visited - I did see you plug in a
recharger though ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
Jack Davis wrote:
Stan, what's the filter size on the FA 300? Do you have an example photo you'd care to
post? How about a shot of the area showing the scuff marks.
Jack, the filters on the F* version are 67mm, and I think it's the same
barrel as the FA* version. My F* 300/4.5 is nearly as
On 28/2/09, Amirkambiz Hamedanizadeh, discombobulated, unleashed:
With special thanks to the followings:
? JC OConnell
MARK!!!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
From: Paul Stenquist
It wasn't that long ago that so many of us waxed poetic over film. We
paid homage to the process, marveled at the wonder of a print coming
to life in the developing tray, swore that we would never be seduced
by the overpriced toys that were digital cameras.
Film is
- Original Message -
From: John Sessoms
Subject: Re: on paper (was: Re: Our Book and other book pictures)
Film is NOT forever, BTW. You have to take care of it.
Digital is NOT forever either, and you have to take even more care of it.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
It's the FA you have for sale, right?
Jack
--- On Sat, 2/28/09, Doug Franklin jehosep...@mindspring.com wrote:
From: Doug Franklin jehosep...@mindspring.com
Subject: Re: FS: Select lenses - 50/1.2, 300/4.5, 50/1.4, 55/1.8
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Saturday, February
In a message dated 2/28/2009 5:36:11 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
rf.sulli...@gmail.com writes:
Marnie,
That's a touching photo, and well convieved and shot.
Regards, Bob S.
-
Thanks, Bob.
Marnie :-)
-
Warning: I am now
Oh, I see. I mistakenly thought you were the one selling the FA and I
wondered why you didn't know the filter size for sure.
Thanks for your effort to help.
Jack
--- On Sat, 2/28/09, Doug Franklin jehosep...@mindspring.com wrote:
From: Doug Franklin jehosep...@mindspring.com
Subject: Re:
In a message dated 2/28/2009 5:44:03 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
jdavi...@yahoo.com writes:
That 'got me' Marnie. Maybe the lighting on the near hand could be taken
down slightly to befit a more nostalgic mood..or not. Ideally, the digits on
the
far side could be sharper. Had there been a
In a message dated 2/28/2009 5:51:39 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
pentko...@gmail.com writes:
Wonderful, powerful.
Good job
Dave
-
Thanks, Dave.
Marnie
-
Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be
In a message dated 2/28/2009 7:36:15 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
pnstenqu...@comcast.net writes:
A great shot. This worked very well. The imagery comes through loud
and clear. It's well framed and beautifully rendered. Excellent in
every way.
Paul
==
Hey, thanks, Paul.
I
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:29:29AM -0600, William Robb scripsit:
- Original Message - From: John Sessoms
Film is NOT forever, BTW. You have to take care of it.
Digital is NOT forever either, and you have to take even more care of it.
NOTHING is forever.
(Diamonds have a half life of
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:38:22 EST
eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
pnstenqu...@comcast.net writes:
A great shot. This worked very well. The imagery comes through loud
and clear. It's well framed and beautifully rendered. Excellent in
every way.
I guess it worked, then. I wasn't positive.
hi
Nick David Wright wrote:
Herein lies one of my biggest peeves about digital photography.
The photographer does not have any control over how the print looks when it is
displayed.
I put some of my best shots on the web a couple years back. On my
fully-calibrated screen they looked wonderful.
In a message dated 2/28/2009 5:03:35 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
pentko...@gmail.com writes:
Hi gang
Just thought i would pass this on, Erin was hurt riding a clients
large pony last night around 4pm.
The horse reared up, with her on its back, but kept on going and she
landed on Erin.
In a message dated 2/28/2009 8:43:45 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
pdml.l...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:38:22 EST
eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
pnstenqu...@comcast.net writes:
A great shot. This worked very well. The imagery comes through loud
and clear. It's well framed and
Dave, please pass to Erin our wishes of speedy and complete recovery.
Boris et al.
David J Brooks wrote:
Hi gang
Just thought i would pass this on, Erin was hurt riding a clients
large pony last night around 4pm.
The horse reared up, with her on its back, but kept on going and she
landed on
In a message dated 2/28/2009 4:04:06 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
msrobert...@ysu.edu writes:
In a couple of decades the average person will no more be able to afford
a printed book than they'll be able afford to stable a horse. It'll be a
nice hobby for the affluent few.
Hi!
About two weeks ago we had the strangest weather. Well, at this very
moment it rains heavily outside, but that day it was indeed very
reminiscent of Dune the movie.
Have a look:
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2009/02/peso-2009-006.html
Have your say as well, as usual, brutal and
Jack - I am out of town, lens isn't with me, but 67mm sounds right.
I'll send you a link later to some shots of, and taken with, this lens.
Yes, it is the FA version.
stan
On Feb 28, 2009, at 10:30 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
It's the FA you have for sale, right?
Jack
--- On Sat, 2/28/09, Doug
eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 2/27/2009 9:28:08 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
ann...@nyc.rr.com writes:
...more Stenquestian than moi...
but there were special circumstances..
http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2607384_N3Nso/1/480279687_EreMs/Medium
that was the dark side
eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 2/27/2009 5:14:24 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
cagu...@earthlink.net writes:
What is the story behind Frank the rabbit ears? I saw a picture someone
showed a way while back with Frank in rabbit ears--it was at GFM he wore
these, right? Is
In a message dated 2/28/2009 9:13:03 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
bori...@gmail.com writes:
Hi!
About two weeks ago we had the strangest weather. Well, at this very
moment it rains heavily outside, but that day it was indeed very
reminiscent of Dune the movie.
Have a look:
Thanks BobW.
Thanks BobS.
Boris (not Bob)
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Boris,
Beautiful, like Bob W said!
Nice to see your little boy growing up.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
I still maintain that good ol' A 50/1.2 is way better than this lens
Thanks, Derby. Wide aperture of A 50/1.2 makes it rather easy to use,
but AFAIR you have one of these yourself ;-).
Boris
Derby Chang wrote:
Boris Liberman wrote:
I still maintain that good ol' A 50/1.2 is way better than this lens
;-). Though of course one has to oneself these things that
Cotty wrote:
On 27/2/09, Christine Aguila, discombobulated, unleashed:
What is the story behind Frank the rabbit ears? I saw a picture someone
showed a way while back with Frank in rabbit ears--it was at GFM he wore
these, right? Is there more to the story then just wearing the ears?
eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
Odd, and disturbing. We were almost totally fog bound for the month of
December. We are not that near the ocean, get fog only now and then normally, and
it usually burns off by 10-11am. Not that month. It didn't burn off and it
went on and on (it actually started
Sorry to hear that, David.
I'm hoping she'll have a swift recovery.
-Brendan
--- On Sat, 2/28/09, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
From: David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com
Subject: Erin had a riding accident Friday
To: Barbara Brooks bbaro...@gmail.com, Jacquilene Currington
OH Dave - so sorry to hear it... glad no surgery necessary...
I was fortunate that the only time I was thrown nothing got broken...
but 've broken lots of bones other ways
and it sure aint fun... but it does get better...
There, theres all around
ann
David J Brooks wrote:
Hi gang
Just
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 07:25:06PM +0200, Boris Liberman scripsit:
Marnie, it is not fog, it is sand probably with some kind of wetness but
still very much sand. You should have seen (right tense?) the black
trace the windshield wipers of my car produced when I started on my way
home in
In a message dated 2/28/2009 9:25:34 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
bori...@gmail.com writes:
Marnie, it is not fog, it is sand probably with some kind of wetness but
still very much sand. You should have seen (right tense?) the black
trace the windshield wipers of my car produced when I
Lovely!!!
Boris
Paul Stenquist wrote:
And washing her pony.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=8603043
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the
Just doing some research and came across this guy, dans la belle France.
http://www.christophehuet.com/
Captivating, disturbing, fascinating, rivetting!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: John Sessoms
Film is NOT forever, BTW. You have to take care of it.
Digital is NOT forever either, and you have to take even more care of it.
When the World Trade Center went down in 2001 the world lost (among
other things,
I like the *permanence* of the way these vehicles are *parked* ;-).
Boris
Rick Womer wrote:
Another from the neighborhood:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=8625352size=lg
Rick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
From: Graydon
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 01:21:02PM +0900, David Savage scripsit:
[snip]
IMO, people just like looking at hard copy prints. You can sit in a
circle with family friends and deal them out like playing cards, and
tell the story behind the shot, or the person/people in the shot.
eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 2/28/2009 4:04:06 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
msrobert...@ysu.edu writes:
In a couple of decades the average person will no more be able to afford
a printed book than they'll be able afford to stable a horse. It'll be a
nice hobby for the affluent
thanks for comments from all the usual suspects :-) Jack, Marnie, Paul,
Dave, Christine...
and anyone who hasn't commented yet (covering my behind hehe)
ann
Jack Davis wrote:
Both shots very well composed and exposed.
I like the idea of the market window adds in the first, especially as it
1 - 100 of 322 matches
Mail list logo
