I like this. Good textures and choice of camera position. I don't
think the flare detracts at all.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Don Guthrie shark50...@gmail.com wrote:
This was a photo I was going to submit for last months PUG. The lens flare
caused by the zoom with no lens hood bothered
http://roman.blakout.net/index.php?/category/27
^^^ Last days of the winter.
--
roman.blakout.net
DA 10-17mm × DA 16-45mm × DA 18-55mm ×
DA 35mm × DA 50-135mm × K-5
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
It's a really cool idea, too bad the pictures look like crap.
Mark.
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:37 AM, John Coyle jco...@iinet.net.au wrote:
Hated it - what was the point?
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net]
David Mann wrote:
On Feb 29, 2012, at 2:25 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
Here they are presented as a Flickr slideshow:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/seriykotik/sets/72157625753792973/show/
And for those who hate Flickr slideshows, a link to the set itself:
Thanks, Paul!
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
You have to judge what the market will bear. Your hourly rate times 10 -- for
an 8 hour shoot day -- should be a fair price that won't send them running to
someone else. That's a 25 percent increase
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
Do you want to encourage them? Or discourage them? Are you underemployed, so
that it would be worth your while to drive out there and spend more time
shooting than you might if they just sent the stuff to you? Or, are
I kinda like it. Maybe I'll try this digitally.
Toine
On 29 February 2012 02:25, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
In otherwords, something cool to do with a film camera.
These may not be everyone's cup 'o tea but I think they are
fantastic. I discovered them in a Flickr contact's
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Toine to...@repiuk.nl wrote:
I kinda like it. Maybe I'll try this digitally.
Toine
Don't for get, you will need to advance your card only a fraction for each shot.
Dave
On 29 February 2012 02:25, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
In otherwords,
Thanks
Dave
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
The NY Times has more than 10 million frames stored in their photo archive --
or morgue as the paper calls it. A few will be puclished on Tumblr every day:
http://livelymorgue.tumblr.com/
--
PDML
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:01 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Toine to...@repiuk.nl wrote:
I kinda like it. Maybe I'll try this digitally.
Toine
Don't for get, you will need to advance your card only a fraction for each
shot.
Dave
Dave, that
On Feb 28, 2012, at 18:56, Paul Stenquist wrote:
The NY Times has more than 10 million frames stored in their photo archive --
or morgue as the paper calls it. A few will be puclished on Tumblr every day:
http://livelymorgue.tumblr.com/
THERE's one for the bookmarked photo-related folder I
BR. I can feel the cold looking at those image. I especially
like the sparkles on the snow in the first one.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Roman Melihhov ro...@blakout.net wrote:
Hmmm? taking one picture like this is a mistake two or three like this
is a project but after that it becomes a style and and not an attractive
one for me. I think there might be one or more good pictures in there
but I don't think the viewer should have to suss them out. YMMV
Thanks for the
Ah come July we will long for crisp days of late Winter.
Good pictures representing that cold cold feeling.
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Roman Melihhov ro...@blakout.net wrote:
http://roman.blakout.net/index.php?/category/27
^^^ Last days of the winter.
--
roman.blakout.net
DA 10-17mm
Much thanks to David Mann, Ann, Mathew Hunt, Walt, Bob S, Brian, Bruce,
Dan, Frank and Steve for your generous comments. You have validated my
taking this photo from the rejects and scrapheap folder. Much
appreciated. Don
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Hello!
I thought some PDMLers might be interested reading this story
about copyright related issues at Pinterest:
http://www.businessinsider.com/pinterest-copyright-issues-lawyer-2012-2
http://ddkportraits.com/2012/02/why-i-tearfully-deleted-my-pinterest-inspiration-boards/
Igor
--
PDML
Thanks Dan, This trestle runs maybe 1.5 miles with oh a 100' drop into
the river valley. The track runs down the middle with the walkway
created by the RR ties on both sides for the repair crews to stand on.
However there is only a hand rail on the one side so they could not pay
me enough to
Thanks for that, Igor. There's a rising chorus of complaints about
Pinterest now. Wonder if it'll survive them?
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote:
Hello!
I thought some PDMLers might be interested reading this story
about copyright related issues at
With the modest amount of work and expense in my booth,
the results have proven respectable.
Image #1:
http://www.brendemuehl.net/images/lighting/40677-1.jpg
This is a very shiny object. Though displayed horizontally
here, it was shot vertically. Though I am shooting through a slot
between my
Terrific link. Thanks, Paul.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
The NY Times has more than 10 million frames stored in their photo archive --
or morgue as the paper calls it. A few will be puclished on Tumblr every day:
On 28/02/2012 22:31, Brian Walters wrote:
Somehow I came across this article while Googling:
http://www.reidandfriends.com.au/2012/02/23/bush-tucker-babe/
It's not of much interest to anyone here (unless, like me, you're
interested in Australian flora), but the second image caught my eye -
Great stuff, Collin. These look excellent.
I noticed a surprising amount of colour noise in #2 though, easily
seen in the darks and even the darker mid-tones. Are you employing any
NR at all? It looks like what I see when shooting RAW at ISO 400
without enabling any colour NR in Lightroom.
On
Great stuff, Collin. These look excellent.
I noticed a surprising amount of colour noise in #2 though, easily
seen in the darks and even the darker mid-tones. Are you employing any
NR at all? It looks like what I see when shooting RAW at ISO 400
without enabling any colour NR in Lightroom.
So . . . this happened this morning, just a few miles down the road from
my house around 5:00 AM. I never heard a thing.
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/walt_gilbert/sets/72157629118984308/
All shots were taken with the K-x fitted with my A 50/1.7 and the K100D
Super with my Promaster
From: Brian Walters
according to PC Magazine:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2400556,00.asp
So, what's all this crap you guys have been feeding me for the past year?
Makes Ken Rockwell look knowledgeable. It's been out for how long and
the computer geek is just now getting
On Feb 29, 2012, at 14:08, Walt Gilbert wrote:
So . . . this happened this morning, just a few miles down the road from my
house around 5:00 AM. I never heard a thing.
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/walt_gilbert/sets/72157629118984308/
Oh, OUCH. I hope everyone came out OK!
Is it a
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Collin Brendemuehl
coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
Great stuff, Collin. These look excellent.
I noticed a surprising amount of colour noise in #2 though, easily
seen in the darks and even the darker mid-tones. Are you employing any
NR at all? It looks like what I
On 2/29/2012 2:23 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Feb 29, 2012, at 14:08, Walt Gilbert wrote:
So . . . this happened this morning, just a few miles down the road from my
house around 5:00 AM. I never heard a thing.
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/walt_gilbert/sets/72157629118984308/
Oh,
I don't really understand why people copy other people's pictures onto their
own servers when they could link to them perfectly legally:
img src=http://www.web-options.com/Snaps/content/images/large/488.jpg;
alt=Awesome snap by great genius Walkden height=600 width=400 /
I suppose the only risk
A beautiful valley on the east side of the West Maui Mountains, where
the rainfall averages 400 inches per year.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=15119623
Comments and Criticisms are invited.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Ooooh; nice! That image should sell some airline tickets.
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
A beautiful valley on the east side of the West Maui Mountains, where
the rainfall averages 400 inches per year.
Kind of off topic, but still of interest. The Amazon deal of the day
is Lightroom 3 for $89.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/goldbox?ref_=pe_36900_22824460
-Adam
--
http://www.mountainfort.com/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
I didn't ask their names. G
This couple is a lot older -- and more colorful -- than most of the
shellists who trumpet the arrival of sunset with conch shells.
(Most are young men perched high on a lanai overlooking the ocean.)
I tried to capture a portrait of the gentleman, but the light was
Very pretty. The dramatic clouds are a plus.
Paul
On Feb 29, 2012, at 4:00 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
A beautiful valley on the east side of the West Maui Mountains, where
the rainfall averages 400 inches per year.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=15119623
Comments and Criticisms
Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
I don't really understand why people copy other people's pictures onto their
own servers when they could link to them perfectly legally:
A lot of sites have their .htaccess file set up to prevent hotlinking
this way.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
This *should* be of great interest to Collin. ;-)
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Adam Montoya amont...@gmail.com wrote:
Kind of off topic, but still of interest. The Amazon deal of the day
is Lightroom 3 for $89.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/goldbox?ref_=pe_36900_22824460
-Adam
--
on 2/29/12 2:15 PMAdam Montoya wrote
Kind of off topic, but still of interest. The Amazon deal of the day
is Lightroom 3 for $89.
it was $70 at BH a few days ago; v4 is right around the corner
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
From: Christine Nielsen
Hi all,
Here's my deal... I have a couple of clients for whom I do product
photography -- small businesses who need images for their websites
promotional materials. Usually, they send me the items, and I charge
an hourly rate for photographing editing. It works
That's my thought. Why upload a picture directly when you could link
back to the page where it live and get more info. I do that for the
food items that I pin. That way I can bookmark the recipes and see
the full details.
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
I
Gotta be pretty much a direct hit to snap the trees like that.
Hope all were well. It's a good reminder to stay safe.
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Walt Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
So . . . this happened this morning, just a few miles down the road from my
house
I don't really understand why people copy other people's pictures onto
their own servers when they could link to them perfectly legally:
A lot of sites have their .htaccess file set up to prevent hotlinking
this way.
I can't understand that either - what's the internet for if not that?
Porn.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWEjvCRPrCo
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
I don't really understand why people copy other people's pictures onto
their own servers when they could link to them perfectly legally:
A lot of sites have their .htaccess
That's what I was thinking while I was taking the shots. I'm still a bit
amazed that the house wasn't demolished. The roof even seemed to be in
pretty good shape. Windows were blown out and such, but it still looked
structurally sound -- though, I wasn't about to try walking into it.
-- Walt
And then some.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxYVBNhJ3pc
On 2/29/2012 4:23 PM, David Parsons wrote:
Porn.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWEjvCRPrCo
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Bob Wp...@web-options.com wrote:
I don't really understand why people copy other people's pictures onto
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:09 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
From: Brian Walters
according to PC Magazine:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2400556,00.asp
So, what's all this crap you guys have been feeding me for the past year?
Makes Ken Rockwell look
Holy Batman!
Glad it was a few miles down the road from you and you didn't hear the
freight train...
Nice photo essay - might drop a couple that are redundant but well done
I'd say - wether channel worthy -
No Outlet indeed :=-]
Like the tidiness of the church..
think 5384 and 5388 and
David Parsons wrote:
That's my thought. Why upload a picture directly when you could link
back to the page where it live and get more info. I do that for the
food items that I pin. That way I can bookmark the recipes and see
the full details.
My thinking exactly: Just link to the page where
WOW. That is nasty weather indeed.
You have documented it quite well, however, Walt.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Walt Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
So . . . this happened this morning, just a few miles down the road from
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
I don't really understand why people copy other people's pictures onto
their own servers when they could link to them perfectly legally:
A lot of sites have their .htaccess file set up to prevent hotlinking
this way.
Thank you, Ann!
I hadn't really thought about it as a photo essay, but I suppose that's
essentially what it is. And I do agree it could benefit from a bit of
paring. I originally approached it as more or less a collection of
glorified snapshots, but I guess therein lies the distinction.
Thanks, Dan! I'm glad you enjoyed them.
Based on the weather forecast, it looks like I may have another
opportunity to do some similar shots before the weekend. Another nasty
front is moving in from the west on Friday, if it holds together.
Wish me metaphysical, meteorological and
The same thing can happen simply by linking to the site. It the risk
you run by making your content available to the entire planet.
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
I don't really
If a bazillion users became interested in reading your articles that's
one thing. You can turn pro, upgrade your hosting package and be
happy.
But articles on a busy site that includes a hotlinked *image* from
yours only causes your own bandwidth to be consumed with no returns to
you. Why should
Pinterest isn't hotlinking. It is saving a copy of the picture on
their CDN and linking back to the original source.
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
If a bazillion users became interested in reading your articles that's
one thing. You can turn pro,
I believe our own Mark Cassino had linking problems.
He had a great collection of insect macros on line (still does), and
all of a sudden visitors from asia were overwhelming his bandwidth.
My concern about hot-linking is porn.
All the abused owner needs to do is change his picture.
Of course,
I know. I was answering the why don't Pinterest just hotlink
question, followed by the what's wrong with hotlinking anyway?
question.
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 7:56 PM, David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com wrote:
Pinterest isn't hotlinking. It is saving a copy of the picture on
their CDN and
That's a great set of photos.
And thanks for making me appreciate California weather. And to think that
after last night's rain I was wondering what it would be like to live someplace
where you didn't automatically check for leaks after every little storm.
On Feb 29, 2012, at 12:08 PM, Walt
Excellent job. If I didn't know better I'd think you knew what you were doing.
For reducing the last bit of slot reflection, could you get a chunk of foam
core, cut a circle in it and just hang it on your lens when you need it?
On Feb 29, 2012, at 11:53 AM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
On 2/29/2012 7:36 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
That's a great set of photos.
And thanks for making me appreciate California weather. And to think that
after last night's rain I was wondering what it would be like to live someplace
where you didn't automatically check for leaks after every little
On 2/29/2012 7:59 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
I believe our own Mark Cassino had linking problems.
He had a great collection of insect macros on line (still does), and
all of a sudden visitors from asia were overwhelming his bandwidth.
Yeah - a site in South Korea put together these really
I smell Melanoma in their future. :-)
On Feb 29, 2012, at 13:21 , Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
I didn't ask their names. G
This couple is a lot older -- and more colorful -- than most of the
shellists who trumpet the arrival of sunset with conch shells.
(Most are young men perched high
Thanks, Bruce and Paul.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Ooooh; nice! That image should sell some airline tickets.
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
I was thinking about blown out sections of a photo and how it is often just one
channel that clips. It seems that it would be possible to do something like
content aware fill, using color balance from nearby areas, and the vallues in
the non clipped channels to extrapolate in the blown out
On 2/29/2012 3:00 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
A beautiful valley on the east side of the West Maui Mountains, where
the rainfall averages 400 inches per year.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=15119623
Comments and Criticisms are invited.
Dan Matyola
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Larry Colen, l...@red4est.com (From
Droid) l...@red4est.com wrote:
I was thinking about blown out sections of a photo and how it is often just
one channel that clips. It seems that it would be possible to do something
like content aware fill, using color
On 2/29/2012 8:57 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Larry Colen, l...@red4est.com (From
Droid)l...@red4est.com wrote:
I was thinking about blown out sections of a photo and how it is often just one
channel that clips. It seems that it would be possible to do something
I decided to work with another pack of film in the Polaroid SX-70 this week,
trying The Impossible Project PX-70 Silver Shot BW film. Only eight
exposures in all for one pack ... makes you think. I decided to play with small
scale still life stuff ... just experimenting still. :-)
Slide show
Thank you, Walt.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Walt Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/29/2012 3:00 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
A beautiful valley on the east side of the West Maui Mountains, where
the rainfall averages
I love the tones and the look of your film camera combination, as well.
Am I correct in seeing some newton rings in those scans? Apparently it
is a common problem with glossy polaroid scanning:
http://www.flickr.com/groups/polaroid_/discuss/72157612531571448/
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I love the tones and the look of your film camera combination, as well.
Am I correct in seeing some newton rings in those scans? Apparently it
is a common problem with glossy polaroid scanning:
On 2/29/2012 6:57 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Larry Colen, l...@red4est.com (From
Droid)l...@red4est.com wrote:
I was thinking about blown out sections of a photo and how it is often just one
channel that clips. It seems that it would be possible to do
On 2/29/2012 1:00 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
A beautiful valley on the east side of the West Maui Mountains, where
the rainfall averages 400 inches per year.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=15119623
Comments and Criticisms are invited.
Wonderful composition. The grass looks
Convent-aware Phil. Wasn't he that nun stalker who was into bad habits?
-D
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On 2/29/2012 7:01 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I decided to work with another pack of film in the Polaroid SX-70 this week, trying The
Impossible Project PX-70 Silver Shot BW film. Only eight exposures in all
for one pack ... makes you think. I decided to play with small scale still life
On 2/28/2012 4:10 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
according to PC Magazine:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2400556,00.asp
So, what's all this crap you guys have been feeding me for the past year?
:-)
Obviously an outlier, and comes to the opposite conclusion to just about
every other
Pentax 645D firmware version 1.13
Pentax K-5 firmware version 1.13
Pentax K-7 firmware version 1.12
Pentax K-r firmware version 1.12
Pentax K-x firmware version 1.03
The only change according to Pentax is improved reliability when
writing to SDXC type memory cards.
Links at
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On 2/29/2012 7:01 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gdgphoto/sets/72157629483212697/show/
Very interesting, there are some very nice images in there.
The, for want of a better word, softness of
77 matches
Mail list logo
