Roman Melihhov escribió:
If you could have 4 lenses (already in production or under development)
for your Pentax DSLR. What it would be?
My 2¢:
=
DA* 17-70mm f/4
DA* 60-250mm f/4
FA 50mm f/1.4
FA 85mm f/2.8 soft
DFA 100mm f/2.8
Ideally, my 4 lenses set would be:
DA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
I stumbled across one of my pics on the web. I don't recall anyone asking if
they could use it, although they may have. There are a lot of things I don't
remember these days:-). I don't mind in the least, but I do wonder what type
of pub this is and what the
Tim Bray escribió:
Just a little piece of evidence that you can get lovely results with
them Tamron telephotos. This is with a 70-210 that's at least ten
years old, on a *ist-D:
http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2005/05/07/-big/IMGP1854.jpg
-T
The Tamron lenses I've had or used have
Timber escribió:
http://www.pbase.com/image/92621610
Sorry if I send too many pictures these days :D but I have time and I
spend it on pentaxing around the town :P
.timber
Please keep sending them, Timber.
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Adam Maas escribió:
I've heard $699 as the likely price. There's also a Sigma 70-200 f2.8
HSM that's likely to be the fastest focusing lens available for Pentax
when it's released shortly (It gets a real ring-type USM motor, which
are typically much faster than the micro-motor USM setup Pentax
Mark Roberts escribió:
http://www.digital.pentax.co.jp/en/lens/roadmap.pdf
Thanks for the link, Mark. But I am afraid I have grown highly skeptical
of Pentax lens roadmaps. If this time they manage to fulfill their
promises, the DA 17-70 and DA 60-250 will surface almost two years after
Tim Bray escribió:
A *real* photographer is never happier than when hunched over beside a
busy thoroughfare in a third-world country being splashed with gutter
contents while switching one exotic prime lens for another. Art
Demands Sacrifice, everyone knows that. -T
I've found myself
David Savage escribió:
Check this post from DPReview:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=23837148
And this page to better illustrate what's supposed to happen:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Stuck%20Flash/misc001.htm
I have an AF360FGZ flash, and I've
P. J. Alling escribió:
Honestly Nikon's autofocus is better than Pentax's but unless you are
willing to spend lots more then you'll get roughly the same performance
from either. In my experience when you need autofocus most is when it's
least reliable no matter what camera brand you
Carlos Royo escribió:
. They are almost very
silent, though, and that is a nice thing.
Damned fingers, I wanted to say They are very silent...
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
Adam Maas escribió:
Having owned a D50, don't judge Nikon's performance by it's AF system.
It isn't anywhere near fast and is the real weak link in that setup.
The D80 will be noticably faster, and something like a D300 will show
a night day difference. The D50's a nice little camera
Jaume Lahuerta escribió:
Carlos,
Now I am curios to know why are you considering other brands...Are you
looking a better AF performance?
My experience with other cameras is mainly with Rebels (EOS 350D and 400D). I
wasn't impressed at all by its ergonomics and features BUT I noticed a
I am sorry to hear such news, Godfrey. It is very difficult to find the
right words in such a sad moment. The only meaningful thing I can offer
is my deepest condolences to you and your brothers.
You wrote:
She was a remarkable person ... even beyond being
my mother and putting up with
Jaume Lahuerta escribió:
In Spanish, I am afraid:
http://www.quesabesde.com/noticias/pentax-k20d-pentax-k200d-mario-britschgi-,1_3961
some links to videos showing the new cameras included.
The site also has a K20D preview with samples, from Dubai:
Charles Robinson escribió:
There's a guy here selling a bunch of old equipment (zx-50, 38-80
zoom, and 80-200 zoom) for not-so-much money. Is the 80-200 (a zoom
range I only have covered with my Vivitar Series 1) worth even $40?
Feels like it couldn't hurt but I'm curious about the
Brian Walters escribió:
Hi all
Just noticed this posting on another list.
http://www.popphoto.com/popularphotographyfeatures/4968/in-memoriam-herbert-keppler-1925-2008.html
It seems as if Keppler has been around forever. The first edition of The
Pentax Way dates from 1966.
He
graywolf escribió:
Took a minute to understand the photo. I thought Muslims had
a thing against cameras, especially in the Mosque?
No, I have been to dozens of mosques in several countries (Turkey,
India, Tunis...), and have taken photos freely. If you have a respectful
behaviour, people
Mark Roberts escribió:
Since it's too big for the mailing list post size limit, it's on the
web.
Dave Brooks and Marnie got in the final quotes of the year last night
(and, yes, Scott Loveless does have the first one for this year).
http://www.robertstech.com/quot2007.htm
Enjoy.
Scott Loveless escribió:
Who's using rechargeable AA or AAA batteries, and which batteries are
you using? Which chargers?
I use GP 2500 mAH AA batteries for my flashes and also Sanyo Eneloop in
my *ist DS. Both of them are good but the Eneloops are the best
rechargeable batteries I've
Bob W escribió:
Hi,
you may recall me banging on before about the late, great James
Ravilious. A rare event is happening in January - an exhibition of
some of his work. It will be at the Coningsby Gallery in London from
Jan 7-12.
Here are some of the pictures:
I can attest it is a very good lens. I have one (HSM version for the
Nikon AF mount) and it is nearly as good as the Pentax FA 80-200 mm. 2.8
I also have, being the only advantages of the Pentax better contrast and
a little more sharpness wide open.
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Burris, James escribió:
Hello all,
Can I use the Sigma APO 1.4x with this lens? What about the 1.7x? Any
good 2x?
Thanks for your help. I may have a line on a 300mm but would like a TC
to go with it - especially the 1.7x if it works well.
I don't know about the Sigma
David J Brooks escribió:
Got an email response from Gentek, in Markham, that service Sigma products.
I explained my problem i was having with the 1.4 APO tele not quite
focusing properly on subjects,
MF or Af, from time to time.(some days it works, others it does not)
The reply was it
P. J. Alling escribió:
Anybody know what's in CRC, it may not be available around here, and a
substitute may be available. I'd like to get this done asap.
Here you can buy CRC contact cleaner in electronic supplies shops.
Web page:
P. J. Alling escribió:
The Jog wheel on my Ds seems to be getting flaky. When attempting to
stop down the aperture or increase shutter speed, (in other words
turning the wheel to the right), it doesn't always stop down, sometimes
it even opens up. Anyone else have this problem and know of
One of the SD cards I use in my DS is a Sandisk Ultra II. I've had it
for more than a year and it has worked flawlessly. As Boris said, there
are some fake Sandisk cards floating around. I hope it isn't a problem
with the camera as someone suggested, it would be much worse.
Carlos
--
PDML
Please accept my heartily felt condolences. And thanks for the photo and
the nice story. I am sure those are sad days for you, but I think the
good memories will help you to overcome your present affliction.
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I still have the FA* 80-200 mm. 2.8 and have reduced the asking price
once more, as I would rather sell it to a PDML member:
FA 80-200 mm. 2.8 LN- (almost like new), boxed, with its original Pentax
pouch and pouch strap, front and back caps and original lenshood. It's
only got a small blemish:
That's a great story, Cory. I am relieved to know everything was alright
in the end.
Thanks for sharing it.
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
Doug Franklin escribió:
Carlos Royo wrote:
Price: now 1250 euros plus shipping
expenses.
You have no idea how much I'd like to take you up on that offer. I
guess if I could get a good price for the FA* 200/2.8 I could probably
afford it, too. :-)
I forgot to say that I would
I have already sold the FA* 24 mm. 2.0, but I still have the FA* 80-200
mm. 2.8 and have reduced the price again.
FA 80-200 mm. 2.8 LN- (almost like new), boxed, with its original Pentax
pouch and pouch strap, front and back caps and original lenshood. It's
only got a small blemish: between the
Thibouille escribió:
Again, someone on DPR certifies the DA70 is perfectly useable on 24x36 body.
Can anybody confirm this ?
Thank you.
Thibouille, if you search the DPreview forum, you will see that some
months ago Richard Day tested the DA limited lenses on a 35 mm. body
(MZ-S), shot
Bob Sullivan escribio':
Carlos,
I think you will have trouble selling the FA 80-200 for 1,300 Euros
with the blemish you describe. That is probably the current market
price, but nobody wants to take the chance on the problem and the cost
of fixing it. I would want to see the problem before
I still have the following lenses for sale. This is my last try before
putting them on sale in Ebay, I have reduced 100 euros the price I ask
for the FA* 80-200 mm. 2.8
FA 24 mm. 2.0, LN- (almost like new), boxed, with original Pentax pouch,
front and back caps and original lenshood. Only the
I still have the following lenses for sale. I have reduced 10 percent
the asking price for the FA 24 mm. 2.0:
FA 24 mm. 2.0, LN- (almost like new), boxed, with original Pentax pouch,
front and back caps and original lenshood. Only the lens hood shows
slight signs of use. Price: now 450 euros,
Digital Image Studio escribió:
On 14/09/2007, Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I'm wondering about is when anyone is going to manufacture a sensor
that actually capture sharp images
Indeed, I think it's appalling that people will have to put up with
ISO3200 images of this
The Pentax FA 80-320mm. or the Tamron 70-300 Di can be good choices. I
had the 80-320 until I sold it last year and I found it quite a
competent lens, although a bit soft at focal lengths beyond 250mm. The
Tamron also seems a good choice, and it has a nice close focusing
capability (1:2
I have the following lenses for sale:
FA 24 mm. 2.0, LN- (almost like new), boxed, with original Pentax pouch,
front and back caps and original lenshood. Only the lens hood shows
slight signs of use. Price: 500 euros, plus shipping expenses.
FA 80-200 mm. 2.8 LN- (almost like new), boxed, with
I am sorry about your loss, Walter. My condolences.
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Juan Buhler escribió:
As some of you know, I've been missing my Leica rangefinder since I
returned to Pentax in 2004 with an istD.
Now, I wasn't really thinking seriously about buying an M8 until
today, when two things happened: I realized I'm getting a nice tax
refund that I wasn't
Thanks for the very useful info, Brendan. I have just ordered one from
the same seller.
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I hope everything turns out well for your daughter, granddaughter and
you, Paul.
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Siddheshwar Lohar escribió:
I have been using this MZ-30 camera (now its obsolete) of course since long.
It started giving some message on its LCD when I switch it on. It shows me
the message Av-- and keeps blinking, nothing happens, i cannot see any other
message and cannot click the
Roman escribió:
I'd ordered my 50-200mm lpentax lense from Pixmania.com, but I stumbled
accross technikdirect.de, that also delivers accross the Europe. They
even have DA* 16-50mm and 50-135mm f2.8 listed as [x] coming. Anyone has
any experience with this online store?
does it go like
Sandy Harris escribió:
There's a 20 mm F2.5 that looks tempting for use in a
K10D-on-a-budget system:
http://www.rugift.com/photocameras/mir_47_k_lens.htm
Anyone have experience with that one? Alternatives?
I had one of those, but used it only on film cameras. It is a well made,
heavy
William Robb escribió:
I meant to reply earlier. Is she a good example of a Pyrenees by European
standard? She looks quite a bit different from what we see here.
William Robb
I have a Mountain of the Pyrenees (female, almost 10 years old), known
as Great Pyrenees in North America. I
Some months ago I was looking for a slim profile bag to carry a SLR/DSLR
with a lens, 2 or 3 small lenses and, from time to time, a flash. I
bought a Tamrac Adventure Messenger 4 and I find it almost perfect for
that purpose. When I need to carry more equipment, I have a bigger bag
and a
Markus Maurer escribió:
I went for a stroll in the incredible golden evening sun in the nearby
forest looking for some close-up photos with the K10D and the Pentax A50mm
macro
when I met this lovely dog. I hope that the owner will let me do some real
portraits of this wonderful big pal, I
Boris Liberman escribió:
Well, I've just parted with $140 (ouch the local taxes and prices) and
now I am happy chap with Manfrotto 676b (digi?) monopod and Manfrotto
486rc2 ball head. I opted to buy this slightly more expensive (at
least locally) ball head, 'cause I hope I will be using it on
Boris Liberman escribió:
Hi!
I've decided I'd buy a monopod. My choices are basically
Slik 350 and
Manfrotto 680.
I have a Manfrotto 479-4B plus 234 RC head and a Slik Easypod. Both of
them are good, but the Manfrotto is more solid and can also be used as a
self-defence weapon if needed.
Roman escribió:
http://www.pixmania.com/
Anyone had experience purchasing from PicMania.com in Europe?
Hi Roman:
I bought my +ist DS from them. Delivery was fast, and I didn't have any
problems, but it is the only experience I've had with that shop so far.
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
John Whittingham escribió:
I'm still keeping my options open as regards an ultra-wide lens for the K10D.
Has anyone tried SMC Pentax (K) 15/3.5 on digital? Does it have the same CA
and distortion problems afflicting just about all the modern counterparts?
I had an A 15 mm. 3.5, which I
Godfrey DiGiorgi escribió:
I was in the neighborhood of Keeble Shuchat Photography today so I
stopped in. Mistake. I noticed that they had one of the Pentax
FA28/2.8 AL lenses on the shelf. I've been tempted to buy one for
over a year. BH has had that lens on backorder for months: I
Jaume Lahuerta escribió:
Yes, you can, although in this range I already have other lenses. In fact
this, along with the DA40 case, was one of the reasons that made me think
that the DA70 might work well in 24x36.
BTW, I have an almost finished Superia 200 roll in my MZ-5n taken exclusively
Thibouille escribió:
Found a SDHC 4GB from Adata at 79 euros (VAT included) in Brussels, Belgium.
It was written 150x on it but didn't pay attention if it was writen
class2 or class6 design (their website says there are both flavours
available.
Unfortunately no reader is giver for that
Hi all:
I would like to know if someone has tried to use the DA 70 mm. 2.4 on a
film SLR, and in that case, whether it covers the 35 mm. film frame or
not, and if there is severe vignetting.
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Godfrey DiGiorgi escribió:
I want to take this moment to say best wishes, good health and good
fortunes for all in the year to come.
I hope you have all had a fine holiday season this year, and look
forward to our continued conversation and discussion in the year to
come.
best,
Boris Liberman escribió:
There is another point here which I probably did not stress enough.
Consider the Pentax Browser 3.0 software. It is fully compatible with
either PEF or DNG from the K10D. Now, on *istD my Tamron 28-75/2.8 does
register properly. On K10D its name does not show
ann sanfedele escribió:
Well the ears fit - but not the high-pitched voice. That would be the
real bunny rabbit - Bugs.
But, although unfortunately I haven't had the pleasure to meet him in
person, I bet he moves fast, at least when cycling. So he meets two of
Cotty's requirements.
Cotty escribió:
On 28/12/06, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'll bring a Nikon and my 70-200VR F2.8 for comparison.All of them
perform very fast with that lens.
Now we need something with tall ears, a high-pitched voice, that moves
very fast. Hwho am I thinking of?
graywolf escribió:
http://www.graywolfphoto.com/digital/TV.html
That's a good looking TV. My cats would love it, it seems very
comfortable, especially in winter.
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Bob W escribió:
Don't spoil my theory with facts!
I'm sorry about that. By the way, you made a beautiful drawing. ;-)
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
There's a very interesting interview with Sebastião Salgado (in Spanish)
at the BBC web site:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/spanish/international/newsid_6173000/6173789.stm#
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Bob W escribió:
A picture is worth a thousand words, so I've made one to show 3
plausible ways of doing it:
http://www.web-options.com/Drawing1.jpg
No doubt there are other possibilities.
Bob, I don't know about other DSLRs, but the *ist DS that I have can't
print RAW (PEF in Pentax
Bill Lawlor escribió:
Does anybody know if the old Spotmatic era right angle magnified viewer will
fit the K10D?
Thanks, Bill Lawlor
You need an M or A Refconverter. The Spotmatic one will not fit. There
is also a Chinese made refconverter (Seagull) which is said to fit
Pentax and
Adam Maas escribió:
It's nigh-on impossible to get a good shot of me with a consumer-level DSLR
that uses preflash, I'm way too sensitive to the preflash and the delay
between preflash and actual firing is too long. I had a friend of mine try
repeatedly with a D70 and SB800, he got good
1996. I found the list following a link in Pentax USA website, if I
remember well.
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Cory Papenfuss escribió:
Trouble is I don't have a way to convert to DNG since I don't run
Winders or MacOS, and writing my own is pointless for the aforementioned
reasons.
Have you tried to run Adobe's DNG converter in Wine (the Windows
emulator-executor for Linux)? I don't know
Boris Liberman escribió:
Hi!
Folks, is it right that A 70-210/4 does not transfer its focal length
to the camera? If so, then I suppose that SR on K10D and K100D will
not work automatically with this lens?
I may have a chance to buy one of these and I am tempted having seen
pictures
Hi Boris:
Like you, I had the F 70-210, but I sold it when my wife gave me the FA*
80-200 2.8 as a birthday present some years ago. Afterwards I thought it
had been a mistake to sell the lens, as I wanted a lighter alternative
telezoom when I don't want to carry the heavy 2.8 lens, so I bought
John Whittingham escribió:
Like you, I had the F 70-210, but I sold it when my wife gave me the
FA* 80-200 2.8 as a birthday present some years ago.
Has she got a sister ;-)
No, unfortunately she has got a brother, and he is as mean as she is
generous...
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
I still have the following lens and camera for sale or trade. I would
exchange or part exchange them for a FA 20 mm. 2.8 or F/FA 135 mm. 2.8
or F/FA 100 mm. 2.8 macro.
Tokina 28-70 2.6-2.8 ATX Pro II (for Pentax AF). Like new, boxed,
including both caps, original hood and instruction manual. A
Congratulations, Gianfranco. I wish you a happy birthday in the company
of your friends and beloved ones.
You're a young folk, I don't think it is odd that you feel the same than
7 years ago.
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Tim Øsleby escribió:
I'm sorry to hear this Dave. I know how it feels.
The last couple of weeks I've had a stray coming to my doorstep. He(?) is
very shy. I've been feeding him for some days, knowing that he does not have
a home. It is not a replacement for my late dog Ludvik, but it feels
Godfrey DiGiorgi escribió:
Better than opening the back of your camera while forgetting to
rewind the film ... !
It happened to me for the first time some months ago. I opened the back
of the MZ-S without rewinding the film. I think I can blame the *ist DS
for that.
Fortunately, I only
David J Brooks escribió:
Had to say good bye to our 16 year old black and white cat, Kelly, today.
I know how you feel, David. My condolences to you and the rest of your
human and feline family.
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Sylwester Pietrzyk escribió:
On 29.10.06, at 16:09 , Bob Shell wrote:
This doesn't mean it was used on a Pentax camera, though. National
Geographic used to have an in-house repair shop that also did
modifications, and they often modified lenses to fit different camera
systems. Sadly that
David Weiss wrote:
What is the difference between SeaMonkey and Firefox? (I am a happy
Firefox user). Just cosmetics?
SeaMonkey includes the web browser, mail, html composer and chatzilla.
For my taste, it offers more configuration options, and looks less
toyish. It is a matter of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(1) Can I get that or older versions as a free download?
Someone wrote (on our list) I could download 7.1 and I can't find that
email now
I want to start using my road runner email account but would definitely
not like to
use outlook.
You can
After selling the A 50 mm. 1.2 and A 15 mm. 3.5, I still have some items
left:
Tokina 28-70 2.6-2.8 ATX Pro II (for Pentax AF). LN in box, including
both caps, hood and instruction manual. A very well made, fast pro zoom.
220 euros.
SMC Pentax 85 mm. 1.8 (K series)+ original lens hood, well
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The 18-55 has some W-shape distortions ... a good lens but not really
at its best for architecture. The DA16-45 has a bit of simple barrel
distortion, easy to correct. The 20-35 has less and has nicer
rendering qualities.
Rendering-wise, the DA16-45 is
I don't know why I am writing an answer, perhaps I like silly surveys.
1. Which do you use/prefer: razor blade or electric shaver?
Razor blade. I keep telling myself I should buy an electric shaver, but
that's a matter of principles, like the aperture simulator holy war:
I'll stay with the
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
All well and good, and no contradiction to what I said. I wouldn't
choose it for doing architecture, however. Between the rendering
quality and the need to do rectilinear correction with PTLens, I'd
find it a pain. ;-)
Godfrey
I agree that there is no
It is sad to know that your brother Powell has passed away. He'll be
missed in the PDML. He helped many of this list with his contributions,
particularly the ones he made about lens repairing procedures.
Please accept my condolences.
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Inet Shopper wrote:
Thanks for pointing out the 16-45/4. I'd wrongly assumed that it would be very
expensive, yet it's priced like the Tamron 17-35/2.8-4. It looks like the
cheap
route would be the kit lens and a used manual focus 28/2 or 35/2, and the more
expensive route would be the
Tom Lesser wrote:
Any recommendations of specific brands/models of P-TTL flashes?
Easy. Brand: Pentax. There are Sigma P-TTL flashes, but they need to be
rechipped to be compatible with the K100D. This may happen again in future.
Models: I have the AF 360 FGZ, and it works really well, but if
Let me add my voice to the ones who have praised your photo. It is
really good.
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Truth is always the first victim of war.
For Anna Politkovskaja:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/6884088
http://www.rsf.org
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're correct. An A lens will give you full functionality, minus autofocus.
The FA 35/2 is a superb lens, and I believe the A version is optically
identical.
They are not the same optically. The FA 35 mm. 2.0 is a newer design, 6
elements in five groups, being one
Bob W wrote:
Who's John Dvorak that anyone should take any notice of him? That
article is so shallow it's laughable.
--
John Dvorak is one of those self-proclaimed pundits. His articles have
been shallow for decades.
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Amita Guha wrote:
PopPhoto says the Nikon is the best superzoom they've seen optically,
and Ken Rockwell claims it's replaced most of the lenses in his bag,
including primes. It's quite a popular lens from what I've seen on
Nikon message boards.
If Ken Rockwell says that, then all of us
If you can read Spanish, there is a hands-on preview of the K10D at:
http://www.quesabesde.com/noticias/pentax-k10d,1_2730
Video at:
http://www.quesabesde.com/camaras-digitales/camaras/pentax-k10d-videos,2204.html
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Taken in San Francisco just outside the bay.
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, handheld
ISO 400, 1/750 sec @ f/9.5
Really beautiful.
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Tim Øsleby wrote:
Yesterday I lost a dear friend of mine, Ludvik.
You may remember him
http://www.photosight.org/photo.php?photoid=37379ref=author
I am sorry about your loss. I know how you feel, I have been through the
same thing several times. You did the right thing, sparing your friend
Bob W wrote:
it doesn't seem to work that way. The Olympus lenses designed for the
4/3 cameras seems to be pretty much the same size weight as their
135 equivalents.
However, they do seem to be able to do other interesting things, such
as a 35-100 fixed f/2 zoom, which is equivalent to a
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Lawrence Kwan wrote:
- SR not operational during Bulb, Remote, Self-Timer or Wireless Flash.
- Retractable Flash cannot be used to control wireless flash.
You need to have an external flash attached to K10D for wireless flash.
I don't
I wrote:
I may be keeping some features for an upscale model, to be released next
year.
Obviously, I meant: THEY may be keeping...
Sorry for the typo.
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Peter Smekal wrote:
Hi folks,
I am thinking about buying a 'normal' prime lens for my istD. One obvious
choice might be the much praised FA 31/1.8. It's quite expensive however. I
have the chance to one of those old K 30/2.8-lenses for a good price, but
... Is the FA 31 worth saving and
J and K Messervy wrote:
The istDL doesn't have a green button, so I've found that I have to use the
DOF preview lever to stop down the lens to get the right exposure settings
in M mode. It works but is not quick or convenient.
You can also use the AE-L button, it does the same than the
Peter Smekal wrote:
Thanks so far.
When it comes to the FA28/2.8 I remember some people were critical of the
light fall off wide open.
Peter
I have used the FA 28 mm. 2.8 both in film and digital, and I haven't
seen any noticeable fall off wide open in real life situations. It
performs
See in:
http://www.steves-digicams.com/pr/pentax_09132006_k10d_pr.html?AType=0
Regards,
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
101 - 200 of 526 matches
Mail list logo
